This application is a National Phase Entry of International Patent Application No. PCT/FR2014/050015, filed on Jan. 7, 2014, which is incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention relates to a method for purifying aromatic amino acids, i.e. amino acids including an aromatic ring, and primarily tryptophan, phenylalanine, tyrosine and histidine.
Aromatic amino acids may be produced by fermentation, by enzymation or via a synthetic route. Tryptophan, phenylalanine and histidine (for infants) are part of the family of essential amino acids: as such, they are used as nutritional supplements. The amino acid must be produced via a fermentative, synthetic or enzymatic route contains impurities, among which sugars and residual substrates, minerals, pigments. These impurities have to be removed in order to attain the degree of purity required for its commercial use.
Various purification methods have been developed for purifying aromatic amino acids. They are based on the following main technologies: crystallization, liquid/liquid extraction and binding onto a resin.
Purification by crystallization is applied via an aqueous or solvent route. Pretreatment steps before crystallization are sometimes provided, so as to increase the purity of the crystals. This may be a purification step on active coal (documents CN 101245047 and CN 102146052); a membrane filtration step on a stainless steel filter (document CN 101376646); an ultrafiltration step (document CN 101691349); or a combination of several successive filtrations for removing several families of impurities, for example a microfiltration/ultrafiltration/nanofiltration sequence (document CN 01812009). Solvents are sometimes added during crystallization in order to attain better degrees of purity, such as acetic acid (documents JP 2097801 and EP 1 756 055), or an aliphatic alcohol (document EP 0 274 728). The use of these solvents causes an increase in the production costs and the costs for treating or recycling mother-liquors.
A second purification route consists of proceeding with liquid/liquid extraction of the amino acid. Thus, a purification of tryptophan was proposed, using surfactants for forming a reverse micellar phase (document CN 102382030), or using toluene (document EP 0 299 715). These techniques are never sufficient as such for attaining high degrees of purity. Pre- and post-treatment steps are necessary. Further, the application of substantial volumes of solvents is economically not very interesting for treating industrial volumes of amino acids at a scale of several kilotons/year/unit.
Finally, a third route proposes a treatment on a polymeric resin. In documents CN 101812488, CN 101948420 and US 2013/0079527, the purification is based on capturing and binding the amino acid on an adsorbent (therefore neutral) resin, and then on elution with ethanol (in the first two documents) or with a salt (in the third document).
Document FR 2 581 654 describes the adsorption of tryptophan on a weakly cross-linked strong cationic polystyrene resin. The target compound is precipitated, and then dissolved in an acid solution, notably a solution of sulfuric or hydrochloric acid having a pH from 1 to 2. The acid solution is then put into contact with a cation exchange resin, which is rinsed with water followed subsequently by elution with a base. This “batch” type method is the route currently in use today for an application to industry.
Document FR 1 502 814 describes the adsorption of tryptophan on a strong cation resin or on a strong anion resin. In both cases, the selected resin has a low cross-linking rate. In the case of strong cation resin, the pH of the mixture containing the tryptophan is adjusted to 2 before it is put into contact with the resin. Elution is carried out in two phases: first elution with a neutral saline solution for removing polluting amino acids, and then elution with a basic solution for desorbing tryptophan. This is a method requiring two distinct eluents and substantial amounts of regenerating agents.
The drawback of the above-described treatments on resins is the need for a significant consumption of concentrated chemical regenerating agent (usually 2 to 10% by mass) for eluting the amino acid after binding. An amount of effluents equivalent to that of the regenerating agent is also generated.
Document U.S. Pat. No. 5,300,653 describes the batchwise separation on a single column of at least one aromatic amino acid from other non-aromatic amino acids on a strong cation resin of the gel type initially converted into a saline form with an alkaline metal. The solution containing the amino acid preferably has a pH from 2 to 12. The amino acid is adsorbed when the solution is passed over the resin, and then it is desorbed with water without any acid or base or organic solvent.
A drawback of this method is that the elution mode does not allow control of the ionic form of the resin. Indeed, the cation species present in the solution to be treated may be exchanged with the alkaline metal, without any eluent being able to maintain the initial ionic form. The separation performances between the amino acids may be affected by these untimely ion exchange mechanisms: therefore, the yields and purities of the produced amino acids risk decreasing or varying in an uncontrolled way over time.
The majority of these treatments on a resin is based on an application of the “batch” type, i.e. discontinuous application. The resins are installed in a column, and the successive eluents (must containing the amino acid; rinse waters; regenerated solutions—saline, basic, acid or alcoholic solutions) are successively percolated through the column.
However the aforementioned document US 2013/0079527 describes a semi-continuous separation on an adsorbent resin of the XAD7 type, in a chromatographic system with a Simulated Moving Bed (SMB) including three separation zones. The system is eluted with water or with salt. This method has the drawback of operating on an adsorbent resin, therefore a more expensive resin than ion exchange resins. Adsorbent resins also tend to be rapidly fouled. Their use requires a cleaning procedure with alcohol, with base and with acid for removing the impurities responsible for the fouling, which increases the operating constraints in terms of costs and installed equipment. Thus, there is a need for developing an improved method for purifying an aromatic amino acid, notably allowing separation between the target amino acid and impurities such as salts, sugars, colors, with a minimum consumption of chemicals.
The invention first relates to a method for purifying an amino acid from an initial mixture, in which the amino acid includes an aromatic ring and has an acidity constant Ka, the method comprising:
According to an embodiment, the initial mixture further comprises sugars and/or salts, and in which the flow enriched in the amino acid includes less sugars and/or salts than the initial mixture. According to an embodiment, the second elution step is an isocratic elution step. According to an embodiment, the amino acid has a basicity constant Kb and, during the first step, the pH is less than or equal to pKb−3, preferably less than or equal to pKb−4, most preferably less than or equal to pKb−5 and ideally less than or equal to pKb−6.
According to an embodiment, the second elution step is directly carried out following the first contacting step, without any intermediate rinsing. According to an embodiment, the eluent solution is a solution of a base in water, the base preferably being soda, potash, ammonia or a mixture thereof and more preferably ammonia. According to an embodiment, the concentration of the base in the eluent solution is from 0.01 to 50 g/L, preferably from 0.2 to 20 g/L, more particularly from 0.5 to 10 g/L, and most particularly from 1 to 5 g/L.
According to an embodiment, the ratio of the number of moles of base in the eluent solution used in the second step over the number of moles of amino acid in the initial mixture put into contact in the first step is less than or equal to 3, preferably less than or equal to 2, preferably less than or equal to 1.5, preferably less than or equal to 1, preferably less than or equal to 0.9, preferably less than or equal to 0.8, preferably less than or equal to 0.7, preferably less than or equal to 0.6, preferably less than or equal to 0.5, preferably less than or equal to 0.4. According to an embodiment, the amino acid is tryptophan or phenylalanine or tyrosine or histidine. According to an embodiment, the strong cation resin is a polystyrene-divinylbenzene copolymer.
According to an embodiment, the strong cation resin has a cross-linking rate from 5 to 12%, preferably from 6 to 11%, more particularly from 7 to 10%, preferably from 8 to 9%. According to an embodiment, the strong cation resin is in a monovalent cation form, preferably in the form of Na+ or K+ or NH4+, and most preferably in the form of NH4+. According to an embodiment, the method is applied in a multi-column chromatographic installation, the installation including preferably at most 30 columns, more preferably at most 20 columns, or at most 12 columns, or at most 8 columns or at most 6 columns.
According to an embodiment, the method is applied in a chromatographic installation with a non-static bed, and preferably in a chromatographic installation with a simulated moving bed, or an actual moving bed, or an improved simulated moving bed, or a sequential simulated moving bed, and preferably with a sequential simulated moving bed. According to an embodiment, the initial mixture is obtained at the end of the treatment of a raw mixture, the raw mixture preferably being a fermentative, synthetic or enzymatic must, and said treatment preferably including one or several steps selected from centrifugation, front filtration, crystallization, tangential filtration, microfiltration and ultrafiltration. According to an embodiment, the method comprises one or several steps for concentrating the flow enriched in the amino acid, preferably selected from concentration by evaporation and notably by evaporation with a falling film, concentration by multi-effect evaporation, membrane concentration and notably nanofiltration.
According to an embodiment, at the end of the concentration step(s), a concentrated amino acid flow on the one hand and an eluent solution flow on the other hand are collected, the method comprising the recycling of this flow of eluent solution towards the second elution step. According to an embodiment, the difference between the pH of the eluent solution used in the second step and the pH of the first step is greater than or equal to 2, preferably greater than or equal to 4, more particularly greater than or equal to 6, and notably greater than or equal to 8.
With the present invention it is possible to overcome the drawbacks of the state of the art. It more particularly provides an improved method for purifying an aromatic amino acid, notably allowing separation between the target amino acid and impurities such as salts, sugars, colors, with a minimum consumption of chemicals. This is accomplished by the use of a strong cation resin (ion exchange resin), which is not used in an ion exchange mode. The invention is based on a chromatographic elution mode wherein the aromatic amino acid is separated from its initial solution by a delay phenomenon due to its affinity with the resin. Thus, the invention intends to put the amino acid, in majority in the zwitterionic form, into contact with the resin (pH greater than or equal to pKa of the amino acid), and then to elute it with a higher pH solution.
The operating mode differs from the existing methods which apply a capture phenomenon by immobilization of the amino acid, and then desorption with a concentrated regeneration eluent. Without intending to be bound by any theory, the inventors estimate that the separation mechanism applied is probably an adsorption phenomenon by hydrophobic interaction between the Pi bonds of the aromatic group and/or of the doublet of the nitrogen atom(s) present in the ring of the amino acid, and the hydrophobic functions of the matrix of the resin: the separation does therefore not consist in a separation by exchange of ions. The present invention may notably be applied with a diluted elution solution and with a lower eluent/amino acid ratio, which makes it possible to minimize chemical consumptions and the amounts of effluents. The invention also makes it possible to implement a purification mechanism in a controlled way, avoiding substantial variations in yield and purity of the produced amino acids.
The invention is now described in more detail and in a non-limiting way in the description which follows. The invention makes it possible to collect in purified form an aromatic amino acid present in an initial mixture, generally an aqueous solution (fermented, synthetic must or stemming from enzymation) containing impurities of various natures: color, salt/minerals, sugars.
Thus, according to an embodiment, the initial mixture contains sugars, for example fermentation nutrients (glucose and/or sucrose, etc.) and/or metabolites. The total sugar content (and in particular the monosaccharide and disaccharide contents) in the initial mixture may thus be for example from 0.01 to 100 g/L, and preferably from 0.1 to 15 g/L. According to an embodiment, the initial mixture contains salts, which may be mineral salts and/or organic salts. The total salt content in the initial mixture may thus be for example from 0.01 to 80 g/L, and preferably from 0.5 to 20 g/L. The conductivity of the initial mixture may for example be from 1 to 200 mS/cm, preferably from 2 to 100 mS/cm and notably from 5 to 50 mS/cm.
According to an embodiment, the initial mixture is obtained at the end of a pretreatment by clarification of the culture broth (or enzymation). This clarification operation may be conducted with various technologies:
The invention provides chromatographic separation on a strong cation resin. By “strong cation resin”, is meant a resin having grafted acid functions which are strong acids. According to a preferred embodiment, the “strong cation resin” means a resin including sulfonic acid functions. According to an embodiment, the cation resin is a strong polystyrene-divinylbenzene (DVB) resin.
According to an embodiment, the resin is in the form of particles, the average volume diameter (Dv50) of which is preferably from 20 to 600 μm, notably from 200 to 350 μm. Preferably, the distribution of the volume diameter of the particles of resin has only one peak (monodispersed distribution). The uniformity coefficient of this distribution may for example be less than or equal to 1.5, or less than or equal to 1.3, or less than or equal to 1.15. The resin particle size distribution may be determined by laser granulometry (NF 13320 standard).
The resin is preferably a macro-crosslinked resin (and is therefore not a resin of the gel type). Thus, according to embodiments, the crosslinking rate of the resin (DVB rate when the resin is the aforementioned copolymer) is from 5 to 6%; or from 6 to 7%; or from 7 to 8%; or from 8 to 9%; or from 9 to 10%; or from 10 to 11%; or from 11 to 12%. The crosslinking rate is defined as the ratio of the amount of crosslinking agent monomers (for example DVB monomers) over the total amount of monomers (for example DVB monomers and other monomers of the resin) which are applied in the manufacturing of the resin (the amounts being expressed in moles).
According to an embodiment, the resin is in a monovalent form. For example, it may be in the form of Na+, K+ or preferably NH4+. Optionally, the method of the invention may comprise a preliminary step of conditioning the resin in a desired ionic form, notably in a Na+, K+ or preferably NH4+ form. This preliminary step may notably be carried out by having a suitable saline or basic solution pass over the resin.
Amino acids behave like weak acids and bases. They have an acidity constant Ka and a basicity constant Kb. We define pKa=−log10(Ka) and pKb=−log10(Kb). The pKa and the pKb represent semi-dissociation pHs, i.e. pHs at which, the acid function, respectively the basic function of the amino acid is half ionized. The form of the amino acid in which both the acid function and the amine (basic) function are ionized is called a zwitterion.
The pKa and pKb values for the four aforementioned aromatic amino acids are the following:
The invention provides a step of putting an initial mixture (or feedstock or feed product) into contact with a chromatographic resin, and then an elution step. In the first step, the pH is greater than or equal to the pKa of the desired aromatic amino acid (or the pKas of the desired aromatic amino acids, if there are several of them), in order to ensure that the amino acid is significantly in the form of a zwitterion. According to certain embodiments, the pH during the first step is greater than or equal to pKa+0.5; or greater than or equal to pKa+1; or greater than or equal to pKa+1.5; or greater than or equal to pKa+2; or greater than or equal to pKa+2.5; or greater than or equal to pKa+3. It should be noted that the pH during the first step may also be less than or equal to pKa+3; or less than or equal to pKa+2.5; or less than or equal to pKa+2; or less than or equal to pKa+1.5; or less than or equal to pKa+1; or less than or equal to pKa+0.5.
According to certain embodiments, the pH during the first step is less than or equal to pKb−3; or less than or equal to pKb−3.5; or less than or equal to pKb−4; or less than or equal to pKb−4.5; or less than or equal to pKb−5; or less than or equal to pKb−5.5; or less than or equal to pKb−6. For example, the pH during the first step may be comprised between pKa and pKb−3; or between pKa and pKb−4, or between pKa and pKb−5, or between pKa and pKb−6. According to certain embodiments, the pH during the first step is from 1.8 to 1.9; or from 1.9 to 2.0; or from 2.0 to 2.1; or from 2.1 to 2.2; or from 2.2 to 2.3; or from 2.3 to 2.4; or from 2.4 to 2.5; or from 2.5 to 2.6; or from 2.6 to 2.7; or from 2.7 to 2.8; or from 2.8 to 2.9; or from 2.9 to 3.0; or from 3.0 to 3.2; or from 3.2 to 3.4; or from 3.4 to 3.6; or from 3.6 to 3.8; or from 3.8 to 4.0; or from 4.0 to 4.5; or from 4.5 to 5.0; or from 5.0 to 5.5; or from 5.5 to 6.0; or from 6.0 to 6.5; or from 6.5 to 7.0. The pH of the feedstock (initial mixture) may be adjusted before putting it into contact with the resin by adding an acid or a base.
In the second step, the eluent is an aqueous solution having a pH greater than that of the first step. The eluent may be a basic aqueous solution, such as an NH3 or NaOH solution, notably. The pH difference between the second step and the first step (ΔpH) may be from 0.5 to 1.0; or from 1.0 to 1.5; or from 1.5 to 2.0; or from 2.0 to 2.5; or from 2.5 to 3.0; or from 3.0 to 3.5; or from 3.5 to 4.0; or from 4.0 to 4.5; or from 4.5 to 5.0; or from 5.0 to 5.5; or from 5.5 to 6.0; or from 6.0 to 6.5; or from 6.5 to 7.0; or from 7.0 to 7.5; or from 7.5 to 8.0; or from 8.0 to 8.5; or from 8.5 to 9.0; or from 9.0 to 9.5; or from 9.5 to 10.0; or from 10.0 to 10.5; or from 10.5 to 11.0; or from 11.0 to 11.5; or from 11.5 to 12.0. The pH of the eluent (second step) may notably be from 7.0 to 7.5; or from 7.5 to 8.0; or from 8.0 to 8.5; or from 8.5 to 9.0; or from 9.0 to 9.5; or from 9.5 to 10.0; or from 10.0 to 10.5; or from 10.5 to 11.0; or from 11.0 to 11.5; or from 11.5 to 12.0; or from 12.0 to 12.5; or from 12.5 to 13.0; or from 13.0 to 13.5; or from 13.5 to 14.0. The eluent may be a solution of a base in water, for example NaOH or NH3, at a concentration from 0.001 to 0.01 g/L; or from 0.01 to 0.1 g/L; or from 0.1 to 0.5 g/L; or from 0.5 to 1 g/L; or from 1 to 2 g/L; or from 2 to 3 g/L; or from 3 to 4 g/L; or from 4 to 5 g/L; or from 5 to 6 g/L; or from 6 to 7 g/L; or from 7 to 8 g/L; or from 8 to 9 g/L; or from 9 to 10 g/L; or from 10 to 15 g/L; or from 15 to 20 g/L; or from 20 to 25 g/L; or from 25 to 50 g/L; or from 50 to 100 g/L.
According to an embodiment, the number of moles of base used for the elution, relative to the number of moles of injected amino acid is less than or equal to 3; or less than or equal to 2; or less than or equal to 1.5; or less than or equal to 1; or less than or equal to 0.9; or less than or equal to 0.8; or less than or equal to 0.7; or less than or equal to 0.6; or less than or equal to 0.5; or less than or equal to 0.4. The elution is preferably isocratic, i.e. the composition of the eluent does not vary over time.
In a preferred embodiment, the cation of the base used for the elution is the cation of the resin. Thus, for example, if the resin is in the form of Na+, the eluent may be a solution of NaOH; if the resin is in the form of K+, the eluent may be a solution of KOH; and if the resin is the form of NH4+, the eluent may be a solution of ammonia.
The elution by the base gives the possibility of maintaining the ionic form of the resin, which may otherwise be modified by mineral salts present in the feedstock solution. Further, without intending to be bound by any theory, the inventors assume an osmotic charge effect on the resin, which also tends to release the adsorbed species. The desired aromatic amino acid has a stronger affinity for the resin than most of the other impurities. Therefore the impurities (for example sugars and salts) are recovered in the raffinate fraction, while the amino acid is recovered in the extract.
According to an embodiment, the total mass content of sugars (in particular monosaccharides and disaccharides) in the extract is reduced by at least 80%, preferably by at least 90%, or by at least 95%, or by at least 98%, or by at least 99%, or by at least 99.5%, or by at least 99.9%, based on the total salt mass content in the initial mixture. Preferably, the extract (flow enriched in the amino acid) is without or essentially without any sugars (in particular monosaccharides and disaccharides). According to an embodiment, the total salt mass content in the extract is reduced by at least 80%, preferably by at least 90%, or by at least 95%, or by at least 98%, or by at least 99%, or by at least 99.5%, or by at least 99.9%, based on the total salt mass content in the initial mixture. Preferably, the extract (flow enriched in the amino acid) is without or essentially without any salts.
According to an embodiment, certain highly retained impurities may be desorbed by additional elution with an aqueous, saline or polar eluent. According to an embodiment, no intermediate rinsing is provided between the contacting step and the elution step. The injection of the eluent thus directly follows the injection of the initial mixture.
According to an embodiment, the recovered amino acid in the extract stemming from the chromatographic separation undergoes additional treatments, such as:
According to a preferred embodiment, the eluent (preferably an NH3 solution) is separated from the amino acid and recovered during the aforementioned post-treatment steps, in order to be recycled at the head of the chromatographic separation process. The method according to the invention may be discontinuous (“batch method”), semi-continuous or continuous. Preferably, it is semi-continuous or continuous.
The chromatographic separation according to the invention may be applied in a chromatographic unit with a static bed or preferably in a chromatographic unit with a non-static bed. In a chromatographic system with a static bed, the mixture of compounds to be separated percolates in a generally cylindrical enclosure (or column). The column contains a bed of porous material (stationary phase) which is permeable to fluids. The percolation rate of each compound in the mixture depends on the physical properties of the compound. The most retained compounds on the stationary phase percolate more slowly than the less retained compounds on the stationary phase. This principle gives the possibility of carrying out the desired separation.
It is possible to carry out such a treatment in several columns in series or in parallel, but generally a chromatographic separation system with a static bed is applied with a single column. Examples of such chromatographic systems with a static bed are the HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography) or CYCLOJET™ (a system with recycling in the stationary state) systems.
The CYCLOJET™ system is as described in document U.S. Pat. No. 6,063,284, to which reference is expressly made. This is a discontinuous chromatographic separation system with a single column, in which the most retained species (i) and then the less retained species (ii) are collected separately at the outlet of the column, the non-separated portion of the chromatogram being recycled by the main pump, and the mixture to be separated being periodically injected by means of an injection loop essentially located in the middle of the recycled portion of the chromatogram. After several chromatographic cycles, the process reaches a periodical stationary state in which the amount of injected products is equal to the amount of separated products collected separately at the outlet of the column. An alternative of the CYCLOJET™ system using two columns is described in document U.S. Pat. No. 5,630,943, to which reference is expressly made.
A system with a non-static bed is a multi-column system, in which the relative positions of the stationary phase bed and of the injection or collecting points of the flows move over time. Examples of such chromatographic systems with a non-static bed are the SMB (simulated moving bed), iSMB (improved simulated moving bed), SSMB (sequential simulated moving bed), AMB (actual moving bed), VARICOL™, MODICON™, POWERFEED™, MCSGP or GSSR (multi-column gradient chromatography) systems.
An SMB system comprises a plurality of individual columns containing an adsorbent, which are connected in series. An eluent flow crosses the columns along a first direction. The injection points of the feed flow and of the eluent flow, as well as the points for collecting the separated compounds, are periodically and simultaneously shifted by means of a set of valves. The global effect is to simulate the operation of a single column containing a moving bed of solid adsorbent, the solid adsorbent moving in a counter-current direction relatively to the eluent flow. Thus, an SMB system consists of columns which contain stationary beds of solid adsorbent through which the eluent passes, but the operation is such that a continuous moving bed at a counter-current is simulated.
The most conventional form of an SMB system is the SMB system with four zones. Other possible forms are the SMB systems with three zones and the SMB systems with two zones (as described in the article “Two Section Simulated Moving Bed Process” of Kwangnam Lee, in Separation Science and Technology 35(4):519-534, 2000, to which reference is expressly made).
In the iSMB and SSMB systems, there is at least one step in which the system operates in a closed loop, without any product entry or exit. An iSMB system is as described in documents EP 0 342 629 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,064,539, to which reference is expressly made. An SSMB system divides the introductions and collections of the flows into subsequences applied periodically.
Other alternatives of the SMB systems are: the SMB system varying over time and the POWERFEED™ system, as described in document U.S. Pat. No. 5,102,553 and in the article “PowerFeed operation of simulated moving bed units: changing flow-rates during the switching interval”, of Zhang et al. in Journal of Chromatography A, 1006:87-99, 2003, to which reference is expressly made; the MODICON™ system as described in document U.S. Pat. No. 7,479,228, to which is reference is expressly made; and the SMB system with internal recirculation, as described in document U.S. Pat. No. 8,282,831, to which reference is expressly made.
An AMB system has an operation similar to an SMB system. However, instead of displacing the feed flow and eluent injection points, as well as the collecting points, by means of a set of valves, a set of adsorption units (columns) are physically displaced relatively to the feed and collecting points. Again, the operation allows simulation of a continuous counter-current moving bed.
A VARICOL™ chromatography system is as described in documents U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,136,198, 6,375,839 6,413,419 and 6,712,973, to which reference is expressly made. A VARICOL™ system comprises a plurality of individual columns containing an adsorbent, which are connected in series. An eluent is passed into the columns along a first direction. Unlike the SMB system, the injection points for the mixture to be separated and for the eluent and the points for collecting the separated compounds in the system are periodically displaced asynchronously, by means of a set of valves. The global effect is to generate separation zones with a variable length over time, thereby allocating the stationary phase dynamically in the zones where it is the most useful, and allowing a similar power of separation with less chromatographic separation units and increased productivity. Unlike an SMB system, a VARICOL™ system does not simulate the operation of a single column containing a moving bed of solid adsorbent, the solid adsorbent moving in a counter-current direction relatively to the eluent flow, and thus the operating principle of the VARICOL™ cannot be applied in an equivalent AMB system.
A preferred example of a simulated moving bed is illustrated with reference to
These phases are operated in this order in a preferred embodiment, from 1 to 4. Their sequence forms a complete sequence. Each sequence (phases Nos. 1 to 4) is repeated six times by shifting the inlets and outlets of cells by incrementing the cell number, from left to right, of the system: the feedstock is thus injected at the top of cell No. 1 in sequence No. 1 and then at the top of cell No. 2 in sequence No. 2, etc. A complete production cycle is achieved after completing the six successive sequences, when the injection point of the feedstock, initially at the inlet of cell No. 1, returns again to the inlet of cell No. 1.
In the foregoing, a description of the SSMB system was given with reference to the case when the cells correspond to columns. This is not a limitation, and the invention also applies to systems in which the cells, or further compartments, are column portions. Moreover, the number of columns present in zones 1, 2, 3 and 4 may vary depending on the desired separation quality. It is therefore possible to devise systems of the same type with one cell, two cells, three cells, four cells and up to twelve cells or more.
The method may further be applied in a non-continuous multi-column installation with either a closed loop or an open loop, like the DCC system described in patent WO 2007/012750. According to an embodiment, a multi-column installation (notably of the SMB type or the like) contains one or several cleaning zones allowing disconnection of a column of the separation loop, in order to periodically desorb compounds (impurities) which are strongly adsorbed, and then regeneration and rebalance of the adsorbent with the eluent of the separation.
The following examples illustrate the invention without limiting it.
In this example, a tryptophan fermentation must is treated, after pretreatment by adjustment to a pH=2.6, and then microfiltration and diafiltration on ceramic membranes. The product is treated on an Applexion® XA2014-22 resin on a 30 mL volume per column (in this example, 30 mL represent 1 BV wherein BV means the Bed Volume of resin). The resin is a strong cation resin of the polymeric polystyrene-DVB type with 8% of DVB, with a monodisperse grain size of 220 μm, and with an ion exchange capability of 1.8 equiv./Lresin. The resin is converted beforehand into the Na form by means of a 4% soda solution.
The initial mixture for the chromatography step contains 17.5 g/L of tryptophan, 3.7 g/L of residual sugars, and has a conductivity of 18.5 mS/cm induced by the salts in solution. This mixture is injected in excess on the resin. During the injection phase, a behavior difference of the different species on the resin is observed:
In this example, the invention is applied in a chromatographic mode on a continuous and multi-column system, to a fermentation must at pH=4 containing 40 g/L tryptophan. The main impurities are residues of substrates, minerals, as well as solid residues of cell metabolism.
The pH of the must is adjusted here to 2.7 by adding H2SO4. At this pH greater than the pKa, tryptophan is found in majority in a zwitterionic form. It is then clarified by tangential microfiltration on a ceramic membrane. The solid suspended materials are retained by the membrane and concentrated in a fraction called a retentate. Tryptophan as well as a majority of the soluble impurities are, as for them, transported through the membrane towards a fraction called a permeate. At the end of the concentration, by adding water into the retentate compartment, it is possible to dilute and then to reconcentrate the retentate: this operation, called diafiltration, allows an increase in the global yield of tryptophan by reducing its residual content in the retentate compartment.
The thereby treated microfiltration permeate contains 98% of the tryptophan initially present in the must, at a concentration of 15 g/L. The impurities are present therein in an amount of 25 g/L of mineral salts: its conductivity has the value 15.9 mS/cm. A sugar level of 3 g/L is also measured. This permeate is used as a product for feeding the SSMB system described above.
According to the SSMB principle discussed earlier, the system used in this specific case consists of 9 separation cells applied as columns and distributed as follows:
Each column contains 475 mL of Applexion® XA2014-22 resin. The size of a bed volume is thereby defined: 1 BV=475 mL. The resin is initially conditioned in the NH4+ form by percolation of ammonia NH3 at a concentration of 3 N. The system is operated at 4.5 BV/h.
The feedstock product is injected at the head of zone 3. At each production period, 7.5 BV of feed stock product are injected. On three columns, the tryptophan is slowed down by a delay phenomenon on the resin, and thus separated from the impurities which are eluted and collected, at the outlet of the zone, in a fraction said to be a “raffinate”. The majority of the impurities (salts and sugars) are eluted in this raffinate: its conductivity has a value of 17.6 mS/cm. The system is adjusted so that 0.1% of the initial tryptophan is eluted in the raffinate fraction.
At the head of zone 1, ammonia diluted to 2 g/L (eluent) is injected, which allows desorption of the tryptophan. At each production period, 5 BV of eluent are injected. The tryptophan is recovered during this elution in a so-called <<extract>> fraction. The conductivity of the extract is less than 200 μS/cm: the latter is demineralized in an amount of 98.8% relatively to the feedstock product. 89% reduction of the residual sugars and 75% of the color are also measured.
A very small amount of ammonia eluent is used: the eluent/feedstock product ratio has the value of 0.67 (volume/volume). Also, a concentration phenomenon is observed during this operation: the tryptophan is eluted to 20 g/L (versus 15 g/L in the feedstock product). More than 99% of the initial tryptophan is recovered in the extract during this step. At each sequence of the SSMB cycle, the amount of NH3 used is 0.59 mol per L of resin, for an injected amount of tryptophan of 1.47 mol/L of resin (i.e. 0.4 mole of NH3 per mole of tryptophan): this demonstrates that the retention mechanism is not ion exchange.
The profile measured in the nine columns, in continuous operation, and during a loop step, is illustrated in
This example is applied from a fermentation must of phenylalanine, pretreated by adjustment to pH=2, and then by microfiltration on ceramic membranes. The product is treated on an Applexion® XA2014-22 resin, on a 30 mL volume per column=1 BV. The resin is converted beforehand into the NH4+ form by means of 3% NH3, is rinsed, and then balanced by the passage of NH3 at 2 g/L.
The chromatography feedstock product contains 32.76 g/L of phenylalanine and has a conductivity of 36.8 mS/cm due to the saline concentration of the medium. The feedstock product is injected in excess on the resin, at 4 BV/h: a phenylalanine retention is observed relatively to salts and sugars, and then a leak of the amino acid. Once the outlet concentration is equal to the inlet concentration of amino acid, the injection of the feedstock product is stopped. The elution of phenylalanine is accomplished with an NH3 concentration of 2 g/L, at 4 BV/h.
This example is applied from a 12.98 g/L histidine solution with a conductivity of 17.48 mS/cm and containing 3.9 g/L of sugars. The solution is adjusted beforehand to pH=2.7 by adding H2SO4. The product is treated on an Applexion® XA2014-22 resin, on a 17 mL volume per column (=1 BV). The resin is converted beforehand into the NH4+ form by means of 3% NH3, is rinsed and then balanced by the passage of NH3 at 2 g/L.
The feedstock product is injected in excess on the resin at 2 BV/h: a phenomenon of retention of histidine is observed and then a leak of amino acid. Once the output concentration is equal to the amino acid inlet concentration, the injection of feedstock product is stopped. The elution of histidine is accomplished with a 2 g/L NH3 concentration at 2 BV/h.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2014/050015 | 1/7/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/104464 | 7/16/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2985589 | Broughton et al. | May 1961 | A |
3450712 | Nagano | Jun 1969 | A |
3696107 | Neuzil | Oct 1972 | A |
3706812 | deRosset et al. | Dec 1972 | A |
3761533 | Otani et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
4036745 | Broughton | Jul 1977 | A |
4048111 | Rosback et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4048205 | Neuzil et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4049688 | Neuzil et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4189422 | Wakeford | Feb 1980 | A |
4189442 | Lubsen et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4313015 | Broughton | Jan 1982 | A |
4329280 | Cleary et al. | May 1982 | A |
4353838 | Cleary et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4353839 | Cleary et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4404145 | Cleary et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4433195 | Kulprathipanja | Feb 1984 | A |
4460675 | Gruetzmacher et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4486618 | Kulprathipanja et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4495106 | Cleary et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4497710 | Wagu et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4511514 | Cleary et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4519952 | Cleary et al. | May 1985 | A |
4521343 | Chao et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4522761 | Cleary et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4524029 | Cleary et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4524030 | Cleary et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4529551 | Cleary et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4560675 | Cleary et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4605783 | Zinnen | Aug 1986 | A |
4720579 | Kulprathipanja | Jan 1988 | A |
4764276 | Berry et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4797233 | Zinnen | Jan 1989 | A |
4882065 | Barder | Nov 1989 | A |
4902829 | Kulprtahipanja | Feb 1990 | A |
4961881 | Ou | Oct 1990 | A |
5064539 | Tanimura et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5068418 | Kulprathipanja et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5068419 | Kulprathipanja et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5069883 | Matonte | Dec 1991 | A |
5093004 | Hotier et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5102553 | Kearney et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5114590 | Hotier et al. | May 1992 | A |
5179219 | Priegnitz | Jan 1993 | A |
5225580 | Zinnen | Jul 1993 | A |
5300653 | Nozaki | Apr 1994 | A |
5405534 | Ishida et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5422007 | Nicoud et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5502077 | Breivik et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5547580 | Tsujii et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5630943 | Grill | May 1997 | A |
5656667 | Breivik et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5698594 | Breivik et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5719302 | Perrut et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5777141 | Brunner et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790181 | Chahl et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5840181 | Patton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840944 | Furihata et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5917068 | Barnicki et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5945318 | Breivik et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6013186 | Patton et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6063284 | Grill | May 2000 | A |
6096218 | Hauck et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6136198 | Adam et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6204401 | Perrut et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6306306 | Voigt et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313330 | Kiyohara et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325598 | Sud et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6325898 | Blehaut et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6350890 | Kiy et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6375839 | Adam et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384077 | Peet et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6409923 | Nicoud et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413419 | Adam et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433201 | Fujita et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6471870 | Nicoud et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6518049 | Haraldsson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6544413 | Nagamatsu et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6675839 | Braithwaite | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6712973 | Adam et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6713447 | Beaudoin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6740243 | Wankat | May 2004 | B2 |
6789502 | Hjaltason et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6863824 | Hamende et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6979402 | Sprague et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7063855 | Hjaltason et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7462643 | Pamparana | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7479228 | Schramm et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7491522 | Haraldsson et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7541480 | Bruzzese | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7588791 | Fabritius | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7667061 | Binder et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7678930 | Sondbo et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7705170 | Geier et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7709236 | Akimoto et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7718698 | Breivik et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7732488 | Breivik et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7807848 | Wang | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7901581 | Bryntesson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8063235 | Krumbholz et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8216475 | Valery et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8282831 | Kessler et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8802880 | Adam et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
9150816 | Nicoud et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9428711 | Adam et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
20010025112 | Fujita et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020011445 | Lehoucq et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020068833 | Chanteloup et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020174769 | Adam et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030006191 | Heikkila et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030216543 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030222024 | Hamende et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040099604 | Hauck et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050087494 | Hauck et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050245405 | Geier et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060008667 | Kim et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060086667 | Hauck et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060124549 | Bailly et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070068873 | Oroskar et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070148315 | Schaap et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070158270 | Geier et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070181504 | Binder et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080234375 | Breivik et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090023808 | Raman et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090130723 | Murata et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090176284 | Furihata et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100012584 | Majewski et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100069492 | Geiringen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100104657 | Sondbo et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100160435 | Bruzzese | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100163490 | Lasalle | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100186587 | Kessler et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100190220 | Furihata et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100197785 | Breivik | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100233281 | Breivik et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100267829 | Breivik et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100331559 | Feist et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331561 | Schaap et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110000853 | Valery et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110015418 | Krumbholz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110030457 | Valery et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110091947 | Kim et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110139001 | Hilaireau et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110168632 | Valery et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120214966 | Theoleyre et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120232141 | Hustvedt et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120309995 | Arhancet et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330043 | Kelliher et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20140128627 | Kelliher et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101709048 | May 2010 | CN |
101709048 | May 2010 | CN |
1338316 | Mar 2005 | DK |
1128881 | Oct 2005 | DK |
0027874 | May 1981 | EP |
0200944 | Nov 1986 | EP |
0255824 | Feb 1988 | EP |
0292846 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0342629 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0697034 | Feb 1996 | EP |
0773283 | May 1997 | EP |
0981399 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1106602 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1128881 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1152755 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1157692 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1166840 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1250058 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1250059 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1392411 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1436370 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1523541 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1534807 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1685222 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1749079 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1982752 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2169038 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2173184 | Apr 2010 | EP |
2173699 | Apr 2010 | EP |
2295529 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2591778 | May 2013 | EP |
2801604 | Nov 2014 | EP |
2883860 | Jun 2015 | EP |
2103302 | Apr 1972 | FR |
2557872 | Jul 1985 | FR |
2651148 | Mar 1991 | FR |
2651149 | Mar 1991 | FR |
2785196 | May 2000 | FR |
2889077 | Feb 2007 | FR |
2897238 | Aug 2007 | FR |
2152030 | Jul 1985 | GB |
2221843 | Feb 1990 | GB |
1078509 | Jun 2006 | HK |
5888339 | May 1983 | JP |
58109444 | Jun 1983 | JP |
60197209 | Oct 1985 | JP |
61-192797 | Aug 1986 | JP |
S62-215564 | Sep 1987 | JP |
H01197596 | Aug 1989 | JP |
H04235701 | Aug 1992 | JP |
05168434 | Jul 1993 | JP |
05171177 | Jul 1993 | JP |
06287594 | Oct 1994 | JP |
08218091 | Aug 1996 | JP |
08512336 | Dec 1996 | JP |
09157684 | Jun 1997 | JP |
H10310555 | Nov 1998 | JP |
11-57302 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-90105 | Apr 1999 | JP |
H11209785 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2001139981 | May 2001 | JP |
2010530068 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2002-0086721 | Nov 2002 | KR |
1797021 | Apr 2009 | SI |
WO-198703899 | Jul 1987 | WO |
WO-9425552 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO-9832514 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO-9851391 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO-9947228 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO-0025885 | May 2000 | WO |
WO-0048592 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO-0150880 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO-0150884 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO-0187452 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-0187924 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-200187451 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-02089946 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-03033631 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO-2004007654 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO-2004007655 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO-2005049772 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO-2005100519 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO-2007012750 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO-2007017240 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO-2007038417 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007075499 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2007093690 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO-20070119369 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO-2007147554 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2008004900 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2008107562 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO-2008149177 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2009006317 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009014452 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009047408 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO-2009105351 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO-2010018423 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO-2010119319 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO-2011080503 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO-2013005046 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013005047 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013005048 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013005051 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013005052 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2015104464 | Jul 2015 | WO |
8905758 | Apr 1990 | ZA |
Entry |
---|
Beebe, Janet M., et al., “Analytical-Scale High-Performance Liquid Chromatography of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Esters Derived From Fish Oils,” Journal of Chromatography, vol. 468, pp. 225-233 (1989). |
Beebe, Janet M., et al., “Preparative-Scale High-Performance Liquid Chromatography of Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Esters Derived From Fish Oil,” Journal of Chromatography, vol. 459, pp. 369-378 (1988). |
Cremasco, M. A., et al.; “Experimental Purification of Paclitaxel From a Complex Mixture of Taxanes Using a Simulated Moving Bed”, Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 26, No. 1, Jan.-Mar. 2009, pp. 207-218. |
Dolan, John W.; “Temperature selectivity in reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography”, Journal of Chromatography A., 965, 2002, pp. 195-205. |
Guiochon, et al., “Chapter 17.8.5 Multicomponent Separations in SMB,” Fundamentals of Preparative and Non-Linear Chromatography, 2nd Ed., pp. 833-835 (2006). |
Heinisch, Sabine, et al.; “Sense and nonsense of high-temperature liquid chromatography”, Journal of Chromatography A., 1216, 2009, pp. 642-658. |
Hidajat, K., et al., “Preparative-scale liquid chromatographic separation of ω-3 fatty acids from fish oil sources,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 702, pp. 215-221 (1995). |
Hur, Jin Seok, et. al.; “New Design of Simulated Moving Bed (SMB) for Ternary Separations”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44(6), 2005, pp. 1906-1913. |
Keßler, Lars Christian, et al.; “Theoretical study of multicomponent continuous countercurrent chromatography based on connected 4-zone units”, Journal of Chromatography A., 1126, 2006, pp. 323-337. |
Kim, Jeung Kun, et al., “Designs of Simulated-Moving-Bed Cascades for Quaternary Separations,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 43, pp. 1071-1080 (2004) (published online Jan. 20, 2004). |
Krzynowek, Judith, et al.; “Purification of Omega-3 Fatty Acids From Fish Oils Using HPLC: An Overview”, Proceedings of the first joint conference of the Tropical and Subtropical Fisheries Technological Society of the Americas with the Atlantic Fisheries Technological Society, 1987, pp. 74-77. |
Lee, Chong Ho, et al.; “Designs of simulated moving bed systems with less than N-1 cascades”, Theories and Applications of Chem. Eng., vol. 9, No. 2, 2003, pp. 1949-1952. |
Lee, Kwangnam, “Two-Section Simulated Moving-Bed Process,” Separation Science and Technology, vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 519-534 (2000). |
Medina, A. Robles, et al., “Concentration and Purification of Stearidonic, Eicosapentaenoic, and Docosahexaenoic Acids from Cod Liver Oil and the Marine Microalga Isochrysis galbana,” Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, vol. 72, No. 5, pp. 575-583 (1995). |
Mun, Sungyong, et al.; “Optimal Design of a Size-Exclusion Tandem Simulated Moving Bed for Insulin Purification”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42(9), 2003, pp. 1977-1993. |
Nicolaos, Alexandre, et al.; “Application of equilibrium theory to ternary moving bed configurations (four+four, five+four, eight and nine zones): I. Linear case”, Journal of Chromatography A., 908, 2001, pp. 71-86. |
Nicolaos, Alexandre, et al.; “Application of the equilibrium theory to ternary moving bed configurations (4+4, 5+4, 8 and 9 zones): II. Langmuir case”, Journal of Chromatography A., 908, 2001, pp. 87-109. |
Nicoud, R. M.; “Chapter 13: Simulated Moving-Bed Chromatography for Biomolecules”, Separation Science and Technology, vol. 2, 2000, pp. 475-509. |
Nicoud, Roger M.; “Chapter 1: Simulated Moving Bed (SMB): Some Possible Applications for Biotechnology”, Bioseparation and Bioprocessing: A Handbook, vol. I: Biochromatography, Membrane Separations, Modeling, Validation, 1998, pp. 1-39. |
Snyder, Lloyd R., et al.; “Chapter 6: Reversed-Phase Chromatography for Neutral Samples,” Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography, Third Edition, 2010, pp. v-xxix and 253-301. |
Szepesy, L., et al.; “Continuous Liquid Chromatography”, Journal of Chromatography, 108, 1975, pp. 285-297. |
Wolcott, R.G., et al.; “Computer simulation for the convenient optimization of isocratic reversed-phase liquid chromatographic separations by varying temperature and mobile phase strength”, Journal of Chromatography A., 869, 2000, pp. 3-25. |
Xie, Yi, et al.; “Standing Wave Design and Experimental Validation of a Tandem Simulated Moving Bed Process for Insulin Purification”, Biotechnology Progress, 18(6), 2002, pp. 1332-1344. |
Yamamura, R., et al.: “Industrial High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Purification of Docosahexaenoic Acid Ethyl Ester and Docosapentaenoic Acid Ethyl Ester from Single-Cell Oil”, Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, vol. 74, No. 11, Jul. 30, 1997, pp. 1435-1440, XP002166746. |
Yoo, Jong Shin, et al.; “Temperature-Programmed Microcolumn Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry”, J. Microcol. Sep., 4(4), Sep. 4, 1992, pp. 349-362. |
Zhang, Ziyang, et al., “PowerFeed operation of simulated moving bed units: changing flow-rates during the switching interval,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1006, pp. 87-99 (2003). |
Zhu, P. L., et al., “Combined use of temperature and solvent strength in reversed-phase gradient elution I. Predicting separation as a function of temperature and gradient conditions,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 756, pp. 21-39 (1996). |
Zhu, P.L., et al.; “Combined use of temperature and solvent strength in reversed-phase gradient elution: IV. Selectivity for neutral (non-ionized) samples as a function of sample type and other separation conditions”, Journal of Chromatography A., 756, 1996, pp. 63-72. |
Zhu, Cuiru, et al.; “Elevated Temperature HPLC: Principles and Applications to Small Molecules and Biomolecules”, LCGC Asia Pacific, vol. 8, No. 1, Mar. 2005, pp. 48-59. |
Partial European Search Report dated Jan. 7, 2014 issued by the European Patent Office in related European App. No. 13305596.2. |
Alkio, M. et al., Purification of polyunsaturated fatty acid esters from tuna oil with supercritical fluid chromatography, 2000, JAOCS, vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 315-321. |
European Search Report dated May 8, 2014 issued by the European Patent Office in related European App. No. 13306701.7. |
Torres C F et al; “Preparation of Purified Acylglycerols of Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Docosahexaenoic Acid and their Re-esterification with Conjugated Linoleic Acid,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, Stoneham, MA, US, vol. 32, Jan. 1, 2003 (Jan. 1, 2003), pp. 49-58. |
Mitten, Jeff; Large-Scale Chromatofraphy; The Green Paradox. Novasep Process.www.guidegreen.com/uploads/final/program. May 30, 2008. |
Dapremont, Olivier; Evolution of Continuous Chromatography: Moving Beyond Chiral SCPhI/ICSE Supplement: API Synthesis, Formulation Development and Manufacturing, Pharmecutical Technology, Supplement to the (Sep. 2010). |
Cernak et al., Distillation—Advances from Modeling to Application—Distillation of Natural Fatty Acids and Their Chemical Derivitives. 5 pp. 109-140, Mar. 2012. |
Stepanowski et al., Total Recycling of Chromatographic solvents—applied managment of methanol and acetonitrile waste. Conservation and Recycling, 35 (2002). |
Observations by Third Parties on Behalf of BASF Pharma (Callanish) Ltd., Submitted to the EPO on May 19, 2015 in EP. App. No. 13305596.2 (Sent by EPO to Applicant on May 29, 2015). |
International Search Report dated Sep. 26, 2014 issued by the World Intellectual Property Organization in International Application No. PCT/FR2014/050015. |
Written Opinion dated Jul. 12, 2016 issued by the World Intellectual Property Organization in International Application No. PCT/FR2014/050015. English Translation provided by the World Intellectual Property Organization. |
Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2020 in related Korean Patent Application No. 10-2016-7020336 with English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160326112 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |