This application claims the priority right from the European patent application EP 07119124.1 that was filed on Oct. 23, 2007, the content of which is herewith incorporated in its entirety by reference.
The invention relates to a method for reaching a neutral position located between two end positions of a gearshift fork in a shift transmission of a motor vehicle.
From the EP 1 300 614 A2 a method for finding a neutral position of a gearshift fork is known. The gearshift fork can be moved between two end positions in two directions. If the gearshift fork is positioned in one of its end positions, a gear of the shift transmission is engaged. For engaging a gear, starting from the neutral position, the gearshift fork passes through a synchronization point related to the particular gear, wherein the rotational speed of an input shaft of the shift transmission is synchronized with the rotational speed of an output shaft. After passing beyond the synchronization point, a positive interlocking is performed between a loose wheel that relates to the respective gear and a shaft (input shaft or output shaft) supporting the loose wheel. By means of this positive interlocking between the loose wheel and the respective shaft the gear is engaged.
According to the EP 1 300 614 A2 a latching force acts upon the gearshift fork or the shifting rod that is part of the gearshift fork, said latching force urging the gearshift fork in the direction of the neutral position when closer to the neutral position, and away from the neutral position when the gearshift fork is more remote from the neutral position. The method according to the EP 1 300 614 A2 focuses on finding the neutral position when the gearshift fork is already close to the neutral position and the latching force pushes the gearshift fork in the direction of the neutral position. For finding this approximate neutral position the EP 1 300 614 A2 suggests to determine the two end positions of the gearshift fork or the two end positions of a shifting sleeve that are moved by means of the gearshift fork and to determine by calculating the arithmetic mean value of the distance between the end positions the neutral position that is typically provided in the middle between the end positions. This, however, requires at least one sensor for determining the position or the position change of the gearshift fork.
In case of failure of the sensor S4 in determining the position, the method according to the EP 1 300 614 A2 can no longer be performed. It is no longer possible to find the neutral position reliably.
It is an object of the invention to create a method allowing measures that are as simple as possible to find the neutral position reliably.
The method according to claim 1 comprises two steps. At first, in a step S1, the gearshift fork is subjected to a first actuating force F1 acting in one of two possible directions, wherein the actuating force F1 is higher than the maximum latching force. In step S2 the step S1 is terminated by means of at least one of the following termination criteria:
The method according to the invention can be performed without any sensor for determining the position of the gearshift fork. This means, when the position sensor in a shift transmission fails, the neutral position can still be found reliably.
As already mentioned above, depending on the position of the gearshift fork the latching force acts in two different directions. Close to the neutral position latching is provided, urging the gearshift fork in the direction of the neutral position. The latching mechanism comprises preferably a latching curve and a latching body, for instance in the form of a spring biased ball or roller, wherein the latching curve is preferably designed so as to provide a maximum latching force in the neutral position.
During the latching action, the latching body is pressed with a particular force against the latching curve. The latching force is therefore the force resulting from the interaction between the latching body and the latching curve in the moving direction of the gearshift fork and onto that gearshift fork.
According to a preferred embodiment the method starts from a starting position in which one gear of the shift transmission is engaged. The step S1 is preceded by a step S0. In step S0, a clutch of the motor vehicle is opened separating the transmission or a partial transmission that relates to the engaged gear from the power of the motor vehicle. Further, it is determined in step S0 that the actuating force F1 acts in the direction of the neutral position. Whether a gear is engaged and if so what gear is engaged can be determined by measuring the rotational speeds of the input shaft and the output shaft. If these rotational speeds (during a certain period of time) are in a constant ratio, knowing the transmission ratios for each gear in the shift transmission, the engaged gear can be identified reliably. If the engaged gear is identified, also the direction can be identified clearly into which gearshift fork has to be moved for reaching the neutral position starting from this engaged gear.
In a preferred embodiment in step 2 only the termination criterion a) is considered. The other two termination criteria b) and c) are not checked. According to the termination criterion a) the gearshift fork is only subjected over a time period Δt1 by the force F1. The time period Δt1 is preferably chosen to be high enough so that the gearshift fork is pressed from the engaged gear into a section where the latching force starts urging the gearshift fork into the neutral position. If the latching force is higher than the frictional force that has to be overcome, the gearshift fork reaches the neutral position by means of the latching action.
After step S2 the gearshift fork can be subjected over a second time period Δt2 in the same direction with a second actuating force F2 that is smaller than the maximum latching force. By limiting the force F2 it is achieved that the gearshift fork, starting from the engaged gear, is not moved beyond the neutral position. This is achieved when the latching force assumes a maximum value in the neutral position, wherein a movement of the gearshift fork from the neutral position is counteracted by the latching force.
In the alternative, in step S2, the gearshift fork is subjected in the same direction over a third time period Δt3 to a third actuating force F3 that is lower than the actuating force F1 and higher than the maximum latching force. The time period Δt3 has to be limited. The time period Δt3 is shorter than the time period that is required for a synchronization of the rotational speeds of the input and output shafts, namely for the gear that is located opposite the gear that was engaged at the beginning of the method. According to this alternative method, if the frictional forces are not too high, due to the force F3, the gearshift fork is moved starting from the engaged gear beyond the neutral position and is stopped at the synchronization point of the gear on the opposite side due to the synchronization starting at this point. By means of limiting the time period Δt3 it is achieved that the gearshift fork is not moved beyond the synchronization point of the opposite gear, but, as far as the latching force in that synchronization point is directed in the direction of the neutral position, pushed back into the neutral position by that latching force. In this connection it is pointed out that the latching forces in the area of the neutral position and in the area of the synchronization point are substantially higher than the occurring frictional forces, wherein it has to be considered that the frictional forces are strongly dependent on the temperature in the transmission.
Further, it is possible that in step S2 only the termination criterion b) is taken into consideration. This is based on the determination that a strong change in the rotational speed of the input shaft in relation to the rotational speed of the output shaft occurs only when the gearshift fork is moved starting from an engaged gear beyond the neutral position to the synchronization point of the opposite gear and at this point there is an acceleration or deceleration due to the starting synchronization of the input shaft. Accordingly, in step S2 the gearshift fork is subjected over a fourth time period Δt4 in the opposite direction with a fourth actuating force F4 that is smaller than the maximum latching force. The force F4 is therein directed towards the neutral position. Limiting the maximum latching force achieves that the force F4 of the gearshift fork does not push said gearshift fork beyond the neutral position, since the maximum of the latching force is reached in the neutral position.
In the alternative, in step S2 the gearshift fork can be subjected in the opposite direction over a fifth time period Δt5 to a fifth actuating force F5 that is lower than the actuating force F1 and higher than the maximum latching force. Subjecting the force F5 ends after the time period Δt5 that is shorter than the time period that is required for a synchronization of the rotational speeds of the input and output shafts. By limiting the time period of subjection to force F5 it is achieved that after reversing the direction of the gearshift fork it is not positioned for too long a time period at the synchronization point of the gear that had just been disengaged. Also in this case appropriately dimensioned latching action accomplishes that the latching force slides the gearshift fork from the synchronization point of the initially engaged gear into the neutral position.
Further, it can be provided that in the step S2 only the termination criteria c) is considered wherein it is checked whether the input shaft and the output shaft are rotating in synchronization with each other. If such a synchronized rotation is no longer present, since due to the missing positive interlocking between the output shaft and the input shaft of the rotational speed of the input shaft decreases, after step S2 the gearshift fork is subjected over a sixth time period Δt6 in the same direction with a sixth actuating force F6 that is smaller than the maximum latching force. In this case, it is taken advantage that the non-synchronized rotation between the output shaft and input shaft is an indicator for the fact that the gear is no longer engaged and therefore the gearshift fork has already moved away from the end position that is related to the gear. The force F6 is therein sufficient to move the gearshift fork further in the direction of the neutral position.
After expiration of the time period Δt6 for the actuating force F6 the direction of that actuating force F6 is reversed likewise only to act over the time period Δt6. This reversing of the direction can be repeated several times, wherein the absolute value of the force F6 and/or the time period Δt6 can be reduced successively. In this embodiment the gearshift fork is moved in the area of the neutral position back and forth until the method finally ends and the gearshift fork is finally positioned safely in the neutral position.
According to a preferred embodiment, all three termination criteria are checked, and depending on the criterion that has been met, different procedural steps are started. Preceding the step S1 the step S0′ can be performed. In this step S0′ it is first identified whether a gear is engaged, wherein in case of a successful identification the actuating force F1 in the direction of the neutral position is established, and after an unsuccessful identification the actuating force F1 acts in the direction of a higher gear and wherein the clutch of the motor vehicle is opened, separating the transmission or a transmission part that relates to the identified or a higher gear from the power of the motor vehicle.
After the steps S0′, S1 and S2 further steps S3 and S4 can follow. In step S3, after start of the termination criteria b) is met, the actuating force F1 is turned off, while when meeting the termination criteria a) or c) the gearshift fork is subjected in the same direction to a seventh actuating force F7 that is lower than the actuating force F1, wherein subjecting to the actuating force F7 is turned off after a seventh time period Δt7 or ends when a fast change of the rotational speed of the input shaft occurs. In the step S4, if the actuating force F7 has not been turned off due to a fast change of the rotational speed of the input shaft, the method is repeated in the opposite direction of movement with the steps S1-S4 if the rotational speed ratios remain the same. If the rotational speed remains the same, apparently the gearshift fork was pushed in the direction of the engaged gear so that the gear has not been disengaged. In this case, the chosen direction of the forces F1 and F7 was wrong and is reversed in step S4. According to a preferred embodiment, the moving speed of the gearshift fork is limited. In case of hydraulic actuators, this can for instance be achieved by flow resistance allowing a particular maximum volume flow rate. In case of electric actuators only a maximum voltage or actuating frequency can be provided.
The values for the time periods Δt1 to Δt7, the rotational speed changes, further rotational speed values as well as the values for the actuating forces F1 to F7 can be determined depending on the temperature and the presumably engaged gear.
The invention is described in more detail by referring to the embodiments shown in the drawings. The drawings show in:
The latching body 2 is pressed by a force against the latching curve 3 as depicted by the arrow demoted 5. The force pressing the latching body 2 against the latching curve 3 can for example be a spring force. The latching curve 3 should be symmetrical in relation to a neutral position N.
If the gearshift fork 4 and therefore the latching curve 3 are shifted in direction L or in direction R, a latching force FR counteracts this movement due to the latching body being biased by a spring force. The diagram shows the latching force FR over the shifting force path s as is shown in
By means of the shifting rod 4 a shifting sleeve can be moved along a shaft comprising two loose wheels that are disposed in an axial distance with respect to each other. Each of the loose wheels comprises teeth that can be brought into engagement with the shifting sleeve that rotates together with the shaft if the loose wheel and the shaft rotate with the same rotational speed. This synchronization of the shaft and the loose wheel is achieved by means of a synchronizing unit. Each loose wheel can be provided for one gear. If the gear is in engagement, the teeth of the shifting sleeve and of the respective loose wheel are in engagement with each other.
In the neutral position N, i.e. in that position of the latching curve 3 in relation to the latching body 2 as shown in
As shown in
Beyond the reverse point U the latching force FR is negative. This results in that beyond the reverse point U the gearshift fork is forced away from its neutral position. The reverse point U in
The range of movement of the shifting rod 4 is limited by two end positions in which one of the gears G1, G2 are engaged, respectively. If the gearshift fork 4 is moved in direction L into the left end position, a gear G1 should be engaged. Correspondingly, in the opposite direction R, an opposite gear G2 should be engaged when the other end position is reached.
When moving in the direction of a gear G, at first a synchronizing point Syn is reached. In this synchronizing point the rotational speed of the loose wheel of the gear that is to be getting engaged is synchronized with the rotational speed of the shaft. After synchronization, a positive interlocking between the teeth of the shifting sleeve and of the loose wheel is established, as denoted in
In the following it is assumed that the two loose wheels are supported on an output shaft of the transmission and stand in engagement with fixed wheels on an input shaft of the transmission. For establishing a positive interlocking between the shifting sleeve and one of the loose wheels, the rotational speeds of the input shaft and the output shaft have to be synchronized.
By referring to the
For shifting the gearshift fork 4 from this point into the neutral position N, the gearshift fork is subjected to a fourth actuating force F4 in direction of the neutral position N that is higher than the maximum latching force FR,max. The turning off criteria for the actuating force F4 is exceeding a limit value for the gradient of the rotational speed nE of the input shaft. A fast decrease in the rotational speed nE (denoted by the reference numeral 8) when starting from the gear G1 indicates that the synchronization point Syn2 of the opposite gear G2 is reached (see point 9), wherein the gear G2 is a higher gear compared to gear G1. As it can be gathered from the diagram of the gearshift fork path s over time (upper part of
The diagram shown in
After expiration of a sixth time period Δt6 the actuating force F6 is reversed and is also established for a limited time period. This reverse of the direction of the force happens several times so that the neutral position is reached safely.
In determinations 55 it is checked whether the gradient of the rotational speed of the input shaft exceeds a certain threshold of value or whether the rotational speed of the input shaft comes close to a rotational speed the input shaft assumes after synchronization with the opposite gear. If a high gradient of the rotational speed nE is determined, the shifting rod was moved starting from the engaged gear beyond the neutral position N and is at the synchronization point of the opposite gear. The force F1 is then turned off at a step 58 and the process is terminated (compare step 59). Since the shifting rod is a position in the synchronization point of the opposite gear, the shifting rod, according to the latching force the diagram according to
If in determination 55 the established threshold value for the gradient of the rotational speed of the input shaft is not exceeded, in the subsequent determinations 56 it is checked whether the input shaft is still synchronized with the output shaft. If such a synchronized rotation is no longer established, a new seventh actuating force F7 is established in step 60 that is smaller than the maximum latching force FR,max.
Step 60 is also reached when a predetermined period of time Δt1 expired during which the shifting rod is subjected to force F1 (compare determinations 57). While subjected to the actuating force F7 it is checked by the determinations 61 and 62 whether the rotational speed of the input shaft comes close to a certain extent to the rotational speed that would be established after synchronization of the opposite gear G2. If this is the case, the gearshift fork was moved beyond the neutral position N up to the opposite synchronization point and the actuating force is turned off in step 58.
If during the determination 62 a seventh time period Δt7 has expired, it is checked in determination 63 whether the rotational speed ratio between input shaft and output shaft as determined during step 52 has changed. If that is the case, likewise the actuating force is turned off (compare steps 58, 59).
If determination of the rotational speeds of the input shaft and the output shaft in determination 51 was not possible and therefore it was impossible to determine the engaged gear, a direction for movement of the shifting rod in direction of the higher gear is determined (step 64). With this direction of movement that had been determined in step 64 the process is run starting with a step 53 up to the end denoted 59. In this case, the chosen direction of movement of the shifting rod might be wrong. For example, the shifting rod could be pushed in direction of a gear that has already been engaged in the process shown in
The embodiment shown in
In contrast to the embodiments discussed above the embodiment shown in
When the synchronization rotational speed nSyn1 has been reached, the shifting rod is subjected to a tenth actuating force F10 that is provided for reaching of the end position of the gear G1.
After a waiting period the clutch is closed for transmitting torque. Thereafter, the shifting rod is subjected to an eleventh actuating force F11 acting in opposite direction. If the gear G1 has been finally engaged, an undercut in the teeth of the loose wheel prevents disengaging of the gear G1. If, however, the end position of G1 was not reached, the actuating force F11 of the synchronization process is turned off and a deviation of the rotational speed nE of the input shaft and the synchronization rotational speed nSyn1 results as this is depicted by the dotted line in the bottom diagram of
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07119124 | Oct 2007 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5626534 | Ashley et al. | May 1997 | A |
6170623 | Eismann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6510931 | Berger et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
20020125094 | Zimmermann et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102 24 062 | Jul 2003 | DE |
0 949 430 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1 300 614 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1 564 448 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2 053 280 | Apr 2009 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090105913 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |