This application claims priority to foreign French patent application No. FR 2004383, filed on May 4, 2020, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The invention relates to a method for receiving and demodulating an amplitude-modulated, pulse position-modulated or pulse width-modulated signal, and to an associated receiver.
The invention in particular targets the general problem of demodulating wideband and high-frequency signals, for example signals in the sub-terahertz spectrum of the order of 90 to 300 GHz. This frequency band has the advantage of being relatively underused, and thus exhibits an opportunity for the development of high-speed radio communication systems.
The applications targeted in this field relate notably to high-speed links between an access point and a core network, short-distance high-speed communications or else links between a base station and multiple users.
A first problem to be solved in this context relates to the ability of a receiver to digitize a wide frequency band. Specifically, analogue-to-digital converter technologies are limited from this standpoint, and do not allow such frequency bands to be digitized. This problem is in particular all the more true for an implementation in mobile terminals with limited resources.
A second problem to be solved relates to phase imperfections of high-frequency oscillators, which cause non-negligible phase noise in the sub-terahertz spectrum.
A first known solution for demodulating wideband signals in the sub-terahertz spectrum consists in implementing a coherent architecture by aggregating multiple frequency channels of smaller width. For example, the total frequency band is broken down into channels of 1 GHz, which are each digitized and demodulated independently.
This first solution makes it possible to adapt to the constraints of analogue-to-digital converters by reducing the sampling frequency for each channel, but exhibits the drawback of being highly sensitive to phase noise, since the frequency oscillators associated with each channel operate at a high frequency. Degradation due to phase noise requires implementing a suitable demodulation algorithm that is more complex in order to correct these imperfections.
Another solution described in American patent application US20050232381 relates to demodulating a wideband signal through projection onto an IQ basis for UWB (ultra-wideband) applications. This solution relates to localization and time-of-arrival measurement applications, and therefore does not involve demodulation. Moreover, the reception that is implemented is coherent in terms of phase, thereby still leading to degradations caused by phase noise in the frequency oscillators.
The invention proposes a method for receiving and demodulating a wideband signal that combines detecting energy and projecting the signal onto an analogue signal basis, for example a Fourier basis. The parallel projections are performed by correlating the square of the received signal with a set of analogue signals forming a projection basis.
The results of the projections are then integrated, digitized and then demodulated jointly via a maximum likelihood algorithm applied to one or more consecutive modulated symbols.
The targeted applications relate notably to the transmission of signals in sub-terahertz frequency bands.
The invention makes it possible to reduce the sampling frequency of analogue-to-digital converters due to the parallel projection onto an analogue signal basis and the joint demodulation of one or more modulated symbols. It also makes it possible to limit the impact of phase noise for very-high-frequency signals.
The proposed implementation moreover has the advantage of an asynchronous approach. The use of quadrature signals as projection basis makes it possible to relax the constraints in terms of synchronization between the transmitter and the receiver.
The invention also makes it possible to demodulate a pulsed signal with converters whose sampling frequency is lower than the frequency of the pulses of the signal.
The invention thus relates to a method for receiving a modulated signal and to a receiver for receiving such a modulated signal, as described in the claims.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent on reading the following description with reference to the following appended drawings.
The received signal is a signal modulated by an amplitude modulation, a pulse position modulation or a pulse width modulation, for example a pulse position modulation (PPM) or a pulse width modulation (PWM) or a pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) or an on-off keying (OOK) amplitude modulation.
The signal is advantageously a signal transmitted in the sub-terahertz spectrum of the order of 90 to 300 GHz.
The invention relates to a receiver for receiving such signals, and therefore the transmission device is not described in detail since it is assumed to fall within general knowledge in the field of the transmission of amplitude-modulated wideband signals.
The wideband receiver REC that is proposed comprises a reception means for receiving a wideband radiofrequency signal comprising notably one or more antennas ANT and an analogue reception chain (not shown in
The analogue signal that is received is then processed by a quadratic detector DET, which performs an analogue function equivalent to squaring the received signal. The quadratic detector DET is for example formed by way of a diode or an automatic mixer device.
The output signal from the quadratic detector DET is then projected, via one or more projection branches, onto an analogue signal basis Ψ1, . . . ΨN. This may be a Fourier basis or a Hadamard basis or any other projection basis defined by analogue signals.
The number of signals of the basis is at least equal to 1.
The projections are performed, on each branch, by an analogue multiplier MUL1, . . . MULN followed by an analogue integrator INT1, . . . INTN.
The output signal from the quadratic detector DET is thus multiplied, on each projection branch, by a function Ψi(t) of the projection basis. When the projection basis is a Fourier basis, the function Ψi(t) is a complex function of the type exp(jφi(t)), which may be generated by way of a frequency oscillator and a phase shifter.
When the projection basis is a Hadamard basis, the function Ψi(t) is a real function calculated from a gate function-type basis function.
Each integrator INT1, . . . INTN integrates the output signal from a multiplier over a duration Ti equal to a multiple of the duration of a symbol Ts of the modulated signal. The following is denoted: Ti=L. Ts, where L is a strictly positive integer.
The output signals from the integrators are then digitized via analogue-to-digital converters ADC1, . . . ADCN, which sample the signals at a sampling frequency at least equal to Fe=1/Ti.
The digitized signals on the various projection branches are grouped into a vector that is produced at the input of a digital demodulator DEMOD, which jointly demodulates the components of the vector using a maximum likelihood algorithm.
The receiver REC according to the invention has multiple advantages over the techniques from the prior art.
Using a quadratic detector upstream of the receiver makes it possible to obviate the phase of the signal and thus to limit the impact of phase noise in spite of the high frequency of the carrier of the signal.
In the case of a Fourier basis, projecting the signal onto this analogue signal basis means that the frequency oscillators operate at very low frequencies in comparison with the carrier frequency of the signal, thereby furthermore making it possible to reduce the impact of phase noise. The frequencies of the oscillators are of the order of the frequency of the transmitted symbols, and may be generated reliably with negligible phase noise.
Lastly, placing the processing operations on multiple projection branches in parallel makes it possible to reduce the sampling frequency of each analogue-to-digital converter, in spite of the width of the spectrum of the received signal.
The method shown in
It comprises a step of receiving the signal 201, a step of squaring the signal 202, a step of projecting 203 the energy of the signal onto one or more projection branches, a step of digitizing 204 the signals projected onto each branch and a step of jointly demodulating 205 the digitized signals on each branch that are grouped into a vector. The projection step 203 comprises, for each branch, a step of multiplying 210 the square of the signal with a component of an analogue signal basis, and then a step of integrating 211 the result over an integration duration at least equal to the duration of a modulated symbol.
By way of illustration, a transmitter EM transmitting an amplitude-modulated wideband signal has been shown on the left in
The receiver comprises substantially the same elements as the one in
Each projection chain comprises a frequency oscillator OSCk for generating a signal at the frequency of a component of a Fourier basis
where Ti is the integration duration of the signal and θk is a residual phase.
The signal that is obtained is multiplied by the output signal from the quadratic detector DET via two multipliers MUL1, MUL2 of two respective quadrature channels I, Q that are phase-offset by π/2.
Each projection chain also comprises two integrators INT1, INT2 with an integration duration Ti and two analogue-to-digital converters ADC1, ADC2 that operate at a sampling frequency at least equal to Fe=1/Ti.
The complex symbols obtained at the output of each projection branch are provided, in the form of a vector λr=[λr0, . . . , λrk, . . . , λrK], to a digital demodulator DEMOD, which demodulates the signal in order to recover the transmitted symbols m.
The symbols at the input of the demodulator may be expressed by the following relationship:
λr=H·λm+λw
H is the transfer function that models the propagation gain of the channel between the transmitter and the receiver,
λm is a complex symbol vector that depends on the information symbols m that have been transmitted and that is known to the receiver,
λw is a vector that models the impact of noise.
The coordinates of the vector λr are expressed via the following relationship:
y(t) is the received analogue signal,
ek(t) corresponds to the signals of the projection basis.
In the same way, the vector λm is expressed via the following relationship:
xm(t) is the modulated signal transmitted from the sequence of symbols m=(m1, . . . mL), where L=Ti/Ts is the number of integrated symbols.
The digital demodulator DEMOD implements a demodulation algorithm based on the criterion of maximum likelihood in order to detect the transmitted vector symbol λm to which the received vector symbol λr is closest. All of the components of the received symbol λr are thus demodulated jointly in order to recover the transmitted sequence m.
In other words, the demodulation algorithm aims to detect the most likely transmitted vector symbol λm. From the demodulated vector symbol λm, it is possible to recover the transmitted sequence of symbols m.
The relationship between each sequence of symbols m and the corresponding vector symbol λm may be determined a priori, analytically or else through estimation in a prior synchronization phase during which pilot symbols known to the transmitter and to the receiver are transmitted.
The maximum likelihood criterion aims to find the sequence of symbols {circumflex over (m)} that maximizes the probability p(λr|m, H) of having transmitted the sequence m, in the knowledge of the received vector symbol λr and the transfer function of the channel H.
By construction, it is demonstrated that h is the sequence of symbols that minimizes the following expression:
μk(m) and σk2 (m) are respectively the mean and the variance of the distribution of the symbols λmk on each projection branch k and for each possible value of m. These statistics may be estimated using reference symbols or pilot symbols or calculated empirically from analytical calculations and from an estimate of the propagation gain of the channel H.
|·| denotes the real Euclidean distance and ∥·∥ denotes the complex Euclidean distance.
If the modulation that is used is a PPM modulation, the energy of the modulated signal does not depend on the transmitted symbol, and the maximum likelihood decision criterion is simplified. It consists in finding the sequence {circumflex over (m)} that minimizes the following expression:
Where N is an integer such that 2N=B·Ti+1, B being the bandwidth of the signal.
Any optimization algorithm based on the maximum likelihood criterion applied to the above relationships may be used to implement the demodulator DEMOD.
The digital demodulator DEMOD may be produced in the form of software and/or hardware, notably using one or more processors and one or more memories. The processor may be a generic processor, a specific processor, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or a field-programmable gate array (FPGA).
The integration period Ti in this example is equal to twice the duration of a pulse Tp.
The projection signal is e1(t)=sin(2πt/Ti).
In a conventional PPM receiver architecture, the energy of the received signal is measured for all possible positions of the modulated pulse. The position corresponding to the maximum amount of energy is used to estimate the transmitted symbol m. PPM receivers from the prior art thus require the integration of analogue-to-digital converters at a sampling frequency Fe=1/Tp.
By contrast, the invention makes it possible to relax this constraint by setting an integration duration Ti to a multiple of the duration of a pulse Tp. In the example in
The invention makes it possible to configure the receiver in accordance with the compromises desired for the targeted application.
In particular, three parameters of the receiver may be adjusted as needed: the sampling frequency Fe of the analogue-to-digital converters, the number of projection branches K and the quantization step of the converters Q. It should be noted that the sampling frequency Fe is linked directly to the integration duration Ti, and therefore to the number L of jointly demodulated symbols.
A high value of each of these three parameters improves the performance of the receiver in terms of bit error rate, but by contrast tightens the implementation constraints on equipment with limited resources.
All of the results shown in
For each curve, different parameters for the number of jointly demodulated symbols L, the number of projection branches K and the quantization step Q are considered.
The curve 501 is obtained for L=1, K=16 and Q=216.
The curve 502 is obtained for L=1, K=16 and Q=21.
The curve 503 is obtained for L=1, K=1 and Q=24.
The curve 504 is obtained for L=4, K=16 and Q=24.
The curve 505 is obtained for L=4, K=4 and Q=24.
The curve 506 is obtained for L=1, K=1 and Q=21.
The curve 507 is obtained for L=4, K=16 and Q=22.
The curve 501 corresponds to the best results in terms of bit error rate, but without taking into account implementation constraints.
These results make it possible to illustrate the possible configuration level of the method and of the receiver according to the invention for selecting the best compromises between demodulation performance and implementation constraints according to the targeted application.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2004383 | May 2020 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5671253 | Stewart | Sep 1997 | A |
6697441 | Bottomley | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6763057 | Fullerton | Jul 2004 | B1 |
7099367 | Richards | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7508879 | Dore | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7590198 | Sanada | Sep 2009 | B2 |
8059710 | Abou Rjeily | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8330462 | Poupon | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8693765 | Mercier | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8897735 | Kim | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9031172 | Dore | May 2015 | B2 |
9178727 | Dore | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9413418 | Bottazzi | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9444515 | Khan | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9712211 | Courouve | Jul 2017 | B2 |
10439851 | Novak | Oct 2019 | B2 |
11057123 | Chang | Jul 2021 | B1 |
11126693 | Moukharski | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11163393 | Alexandre | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11240070 | Lin | Feb 2022 | B1 |
20020130807 | Hall | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030022680 | Shreve | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025631 | Kim | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030030583 | Finn | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030058971 | Langford | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030076879 | Langford | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030108133 | Richards | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030232612 | Richards | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040136439 | Dewberry | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040161064 | Brethour | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050089083 | Fisher | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050232381 | Paquelet | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239432 | Wilcox | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060025086 | Dore | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060145853 | Richards | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080186032 | Van Bezooijen | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100176982 | Lachartre | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110182501 | Mercier | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120212290 | Hafuka | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130045701 | Beukema | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130049839 | Cheng | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130258834 | Mihota | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150063507 | Dore | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20170012676 | Courouve | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170302381 | Riani | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180176041 | Yue | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180227162 | Tokuhiro | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180331732 | Shattil | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190227690 | Alexandre | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20210135692 | de Ruijter | May 2021 | A1 |
20210242894 | de Ruijter | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210344531 | Bicais | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210377083 | Bicais | Dec 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004001998 | Dec 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Solda, et al., “A 5Mb/s UWB-IR CMOS transceiver with a 186 pJ/b and 150 pJ/b TX/RX energy request”, 2010 Proceedings of ESSCIRC, pp. 498-501, Sep. 2010. |
Zhou, et al., “A Flexible Back-end with Optimum Threshold Estimation for OOK Based Energy Detection IR-UWB Receivers”, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Ultra-Wideband (ICUWB), pp. 130-134, Sep. 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210344531 A1 | Nov 2021 | US |