The invention relates to a method for reconditioning a used grinding roller of a high-pressure material bed roller mill in accordance with the preamble of claim 1.
Grinding rollers of this type are known, for example, from EP 0 516 952 B1. They contain a plurality of wear-resistant profile-members which are embedded, with a portion of the length thereof, in holes of the roller body and, with the remainder of the length thereof, project above the surface of the roller body. When such rollers are operated, the intermediate spaces between the projecting profile-members are filled with the material to be comminuted which is supplied to the material bed roller mill and which therefore produces a given autogenous wear protection for the surface of the roller body.
Both the projecting profile-members and the surface of the roller body are subjected, in the course of the operating time, to unavoidable wear which makes reconditioning of the grinding roller necessary if the roller body is intended to be further used.
DE 196 18 143 A1 discloses a grinding roller, in which the hardness of the material of the roller body forming the roller surface is greater than 56 HRc (Rockwell hardness). That grinding roller is used in comminution operation until a substantial portion of all the profile-members is completely worn and/or has fallen out of the roller body. The reconditioning of the used grinding roller is then carried out in such a manner that the roller surface has its cylindrical shape conferred on it again by the profile-members and the original holes being completely turned, after which new holes are produced and new profile-members are introduced into those holes.
Although it is possible, by using an extraordinarily hard base material for the surface of the roller body, for that surface to wear substantially only to the same extent as the projecting profile-members, the complete turning of the surface of the roller body provided with holes involves substantial complexity owing to the great hardness of the surface material when a used grinding roller of this type is reconditioned.
Therefore, the problem addressed by the invention is to configure a method in accordance with the preamble of claim 1 in such a manner that cost-effective reconditioning of a used grinding roller is possible.
This problem is solved according to the invention by the characterising features of claim 1. The subsidiary claims relate to advantageous constructions of the invention.
In the method according to the invention, the worn surface of the roller body is turned at least in a part-region of the width of the roller body when a specific wear state is reached. Subsequently, a material layer is applied at least to the turned surface in a welding operation in order to increase the diameter.
In another operating step, the welded material layer is subsequently provided with holes for receiving new profile-members. In accordance with the thickness of the welded material layer and the desired anchoring depth of the new profile-members, those holes can either be provided only in the welded material layer or extend as far as a location in the base material of the roller body under that material layer.
The advantageous selection of the part-regions to be turned, the selection of the turning depth and the thickness of the material layers which are welded in the individual part-regions particularly depend on the respective wear situation.
For instance, it may be advantageous for less heavily worn part-regions to be turned as far as the diameter of the most heavily worn part-region and then for a common material layer to be applied to those differently worn part-regions.
Instead, however, it is also possible to turn differently worn part-regions in different manners and, subsequently, to weld material layers of different thicknesses to the surface of those part-regions in order to obtain a uniform outer diameter.
Finally, it may also be advantageous in a corresponding wear situation for only the most heavily worn part-region to be turned and for a material layer to be welded only to that turned part-region.
Owing to the operations according to the invention, therefore, the worn surface of a roller body can also be levelled again with varying degrees of wear of the individual part-regions with the smallest possible complexity in terms of material and work. The method according to the invention is consequently distinguished by a time-saving, material-saving and cost-effective reconditioning of a used grinding roller.
A number of embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the drawings.
Subsequently, the worn surface 1′a of the roller body 1′ is turned as far as a diameter D. The diameter D is, in this embodiment, smaller than the diameter of the base of the holes 2, 3, 4. Those old holes are consequently completely removed by the turning operation.
Subsequently, a material layer 16 is applied to the turned surface 1′b of the roller body 1 in a welding operation in order to increase the diameter. That material layer 16 is then provided with holes 22, 23, 24 in order to receive new profile-members 32, 33, 34.
In the additional embodiment illustrated in
A plurality of coatings of a material layer 26 are subsequently applied in a welding operation to the substantially levelled surface 1′c which is produced in this manner. Subsequently, that material layer 26 is provided with holes 22, 23, 24, in which new profile-members 32, 33, 34 are introduced.
Whereas, in the embodiments explained with reference to
In the variant (illustrated in
There applies to the method according to the invention the principle that the roller body does not in each case have to have a uniform diameter over the entire length of the roller body after the reconditioning operation. Instead, different diameters can be selected for individual part-regions, for instance, if the peripheral region is worn only to a small degree and therefore no welding is carried out at that location.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 012 102 | Mar 2007 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/064203 | 12/19/2007 | WO | 00 | 9/2/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/110224 | 9/18/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
412558 | Stephens | Oct 1889 | A |
1340032 | Fleming | May 1920 | A |
1884104 | Moore et al. | Oct 1932 | A |
2195256 | Palmer | Mar 1940 | A |
2817218 | Beckwith | Dec 1957 | A |
3004336 | Timuska | Oct 1961 | A |
3006064 | Watson | Oct 1961 | A |
3006065 | Watson | Oct 1961 | A |
3007231 | Garver | Nov 1961 | A |
3168767 | Lutz | Feb 1965 | A |
3227008 | Celovsky | Jan 1966 | A |
3412946 | Gabler et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
4322596 | Krakow et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4404450 | Weldon | Sep 1983 | A |
4748736 | Miihkinen | Jun 1988 | A |
5054702 | Heinemann | Oct 1991 | A |
5269477 | Buchholtz et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5273512 | Ducasse | Dec 1993 | A |
5601520 | Wollner et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5660092 | Scholz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5704561 | Ansen et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5954282 | Britzke et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6786630 | Haberer | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7008123 | Camp et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7497396 | Splinter et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510135 | Burchardt et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7669331 | Sohl et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7946518 | Patzelt et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20040244455 | Eschner | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2202213 | Apr 1997 | CA |
19618143 | Nov 1997 | DE |
19618143 | Nov 1997 | DE |
0516952 | Dec 1992 | EP |
04284858 | Oct 1992 | JP |
WO 8700105 | Jan 1987 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100058570 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |