Patent Application
20160002853
The present method deals with the recovery of pulping chemicals, the recovery of by-products and the purging of non-process elements from spent pulping liquors produced in kraft-type pulping at very high sulphidity at a pulp mill.
In the conventional kraft pulping process, the active pulping chemicals are sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium sulphide (Na2S). The amount of Na2S relative to the amount of NaOH is characterized by a parameter termed the sulphidity which is defined as follows:
Sulphidity (%)=mNa2S×100/(mNaOH/2+mNa2S),
where mNa2S the number of moles of Na2S and mNaOH the number of moles of NaOH
In the conventional kraft pulping process, the sulphidity of the pulping liquor is typically in the range 25-40%. In kraft-type pulping, increasing the sulphidity of the pulping liquor is usually beneficial from the point of view of the pulping stage. Typically, the upper limit on sulphidity in the conventional kraft pulping process is not set by the demands of the pulping stage but by the demands of the chemical-recovery process. When the sulphidity exceeds a certain value, sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions from the chemical-recovery boiler increase to an unacceptable level, all other process variables being unchanged. The increased SO2 emission level is a consequence of the fact that the release of alkali-metal compounds from the spent pulping liquor during combustion is no longer sufficient for the capture of the greater part of the sulphur compounds released from the liquor.
Kraft-type pulping at very high sulphidity is a known pulping method. In fact, the most well-known specific method employs 100% sulphidity. In other words, in this particular method, only one active pulping chemical—Na2S—is employed. This method, which was studied and developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s, goes by the name of the Alkafide process (Munk L., Todorski Z., Bryce J. R. G., Tomlinson G. H., Pulp Paper Mag. Can. 65(1964)10, p. T411; Tomlinson G. H., Canadian Patent 725,072; Tomlinson G. H., U.S. Pat. No. 3,347,739; Ingruber O. V., Allard G. A., Pulp Paper Mag. Can. 74(1973)11, p. T354). According to these previous studies, the alkali consumption is reduced by 30-40% in Alkafide pulping compared to conventional kraft pulping. The pulp yield is reported to be the same for kraft and Alkafide pulps, while the strength properties are improved by the higher sulphidity. In other words, from the point of view of the pulping stage only, pulping at 100% sulphidity is superior to conventional kraft pulping. However, widespread commercialization of this pulping method never occurred. Presumably this was due to the lack of a cost-effective method for recovering the pulping chemical, Na2S.
In present-day pulp mills based on conventional alkaline pulping processes, such as the conventional kraft pulping process, only limited amounts of by-products are recoverable in an economically viable way. These potential by-products—turpentine and tall oil—originate from the extractives component of the pulping raw material. However, the spent pulping liquor contains large quantities of other potential by-products originating from the pulping raw material. These include lignin and aliphatic hydroxy acids. In present-day alkaline pulping mills, these components are exploited as fuel in the chemical-recovery boiler. However, in recent years, interest in recovering additional by-products from spent alkaline pulping liquors has been increasing. The greatest techno-economical challenge is associated with the need to lower the pH of the spent pulping liquor in order to liberate organic compounds from their sodium salts. Utilization of purchased acid to achieve this is not an attractive option because of both the direct costs of the acid and the possible indirect costs arising from disturbances to the mill chemical balances. Ideally, the required acidification of the spent pulping liquor would be carried out with internally generated acid.
In pulp mills employing conventional alkaline pulping processes, such as the conventional kraft pulping process, potentially problematic non-process elements include silicon and phosphorus. These accumulate in the lime cycle of the mill and have a severe deleterious impact on the operability and efficiency of that cycle. (The lime cycle provides calcium oxide (CaO) for reactions in the main recovery cycle, accepts the reaction product, calcium carbonate (CaCO3), and reconverts the CaCO3 into CaO.) In addition, silicon compounds dissolved in the spent pulping liquor cause problems during concentration of the liquor by evaporation (higher viscosity, deposits) and combustion of the liquor (deposits). The severity of the silicon problem obviously increases with increasing content of silicon in the raw material employed for pulping. Cereal straws and certain tropical woods have high silicon contents. Silicon may be effectively removed from chemical-recovery cycle by lowering the pH of the spent pulping liquor and removing the silicon containing material thus precipitated. As in the case of recovery of by-products such as lignin, the required acidification of the spent pulping liquor would, ideally, be carried out with internally generated acid.
Use of internally generated acid has previously been proposed for acidification of spent pulping liquor. The main emphasis has been on the exploitation of carbon dioxide (CO2) contained in flue gases. CO2, a weak acid, is effective in lowering the pH of spent alkaline pulping liquor to around 10, which is sufficient to precipitate a significant amount of the lignin contained in the liquor, thus allowing recovery of lignin as a by-product. Similarly, several known methods for purging silicon from the chemical-recovery cycle are based on the use of CO2 for acidifying the spent pulping liquor. One approach has been to use flue gas as such as the acidifying medium. This approach has not led to any long-lived commercial applications. Another approach is to remove CO2 from flue gases and use the recovered CO2 in a concentrated form. This approach has proved too costly. Use of purchased CO2 for acidifying spent pulping liquor to a pH around 10 is the basis of several current processes for recovering lignin from spent pulping liquor.
At a conventional kraft pulping mill, one stream that is readily convertible into acid is the stream made up of concentrated non-condensable gases (CNCG) collected as a side-product from several mill operations, in particular from pulping and evaporation operations. Sulphur containing compounds, in particular hydrogen sulphide (H2S), methyl mercaptan (CH3SH) and dimethyl sulphide ((CH3)2S), are main components in these gases. Oxidation of these gases yields an acidic compound, sulphur dioxide (SO2), which may be further converted into the strong mineral acid, sulphuric acid (H2SO4). However, the amount of acid that could be produced in this way is relatively small, which may explain why acid generated from CNCG has not, in general, been proposed for acidifying spent kraft pulping liquor. Typically, the amount of sulphur contained in the total CNCG stream of the pulp mill could provide enough H2SO4 to acidify less than 5% of the total spent pulping liquor to a pH of 10. In a method disclosed in US Patent Application US2008/0214796A1, acid generated from CNCG is used for washing lignin precipitated from spent kraft pulping liquor, while CO2 is employed for the preceding acidification step.
In a method disclosed in Patent Application WO2010/143997A1, gases, mainly CO2 and H2S, are recycled from the acidic washing stage of a lignin-recovery process to the precipitation stage of the same lignin-recovery process. Being acidic gases, the recycled CO2 and H2S can reduce, to some extent, the amount of external acid, typically CO2, employed to acidify spent pulping liquor in the precipitation stage. In one of the embodiments of the method, the recycled H2S is first converted into stronger acid such as H2SO4. It is important to note that (1) a very minor or negligible amount of H2S is released in the acidification stage of this method, (2) in the example given in the patent document, a significant part of the savings in acid consumption in the precipitation stage is attributable to recycled CO2 rather than to recycled H2S and (3) the amount of input acid required in the acidic washing stage—measured in terms of amount of H+ ions—clearly exceeds the amount of acid that could be supplied by utilizing or converting all the CO2 and H2S released in the same acidic washing stage. Thus, the amount of H2S recycled in this method is much less than the amount that would be necessary to cover all the acid consumed in the process even if the H2S were to be first converted to a stronger acid such as H2SO4.
In the light of the prior art, there is a clear need for:
An object of the present invention is to provide a method which can meet both these needs simultaneously.
This object is attained by means of a method according to claim 1.
The present invention is a new method to be used in connection with the recovery of pulping chemicals from the spent pulping liquor produced by kraft-type pulping at very high sulphidity. In the new method, spent pulping liquor is acidified with internally generated acid to a relatively low pH, preferably below 7, most preferably below 6. The acidification of the spent pulping liquor may be exploited as a means to increase recovery of by-products and/or to purge non-process elements from the chemical-recovery cycle.
Kraft-type pulping can be considered to be conducted under conditions of very high sulphidity when the sulphidity of the pulping liquor is greater than 40%. For the purposes of the present new method, the sulphidity is preferably in the range 50-100%, most preferably in the range 70-100%.
Two problems which the invention set out to solve were:
The present invention can provide solutions to both these problems.
When a pH value is referred to herein, it is the pH of the solution in question at 25° C.
The key idea behind the present invention is an entirely new type of adjunct chemical-recovery cycle for kraft-type pulping. A very high level of sulphidity in the pulping stage is a precondition for application of the new adjunct cycle. In the chemical-recovery process employed in conjunction with conventional kraft pulping, the lime cycle constitutes an adjunct cycle. In the overall chemical-recovery process that would incorporate the new adjunct cycle, the required capacity of the lime cycle would be decreased remarkably. In some cases, the lime cycle could be eliminated entirely.
The new adjunct cycle (1) takes up sulphur gases, primarily composed of H2S and primarily generated by acidifying the spent pulping liquor to the extent necessary to convert a large part, such as over 75%, or all, of the sulphide and hydrosulphide in the liquor into H2S, and, preferably together with other CNCG gases collected at the pulp mill, (2) converts these gases largely into an acid compound, preferably H2SO4, and then (3) returns the acid for use as the main agent for the previously mentioned acidification of the spent pulping liquor. The amount of acid generated in the cycle is sufficient to provide most, if not all, of that required for the acidification step. In certain methods of the prior art, e.g. as disclosed in patent applications US2008/0214796A1 and WO2010/143997A1, acid is internally generated from H2S released from spent pulping liquor but, in all cases, the amount of acid is much smaller than the amount which would be needed to establish an adjunct cycle as described above.
Acidic compounds may be generated from sulphur containing materials via their oxidation. Such acidic compounds include SO2, sodium bisulphite (NaHSO3) and H2SO4. From the point of view of the present invention, H2SO4 is the preferred acidic compound because a pH below 7 can be readily reached with two H+ ions being supplied for each sulphur atom. The most well-known process for producing concentrated H2SO4 from reduced sulphur gases, such as H2S, encompasses the following main steps: (1) combustion of reduced sulphur gases to form SO2, (2) recovering heat from hot gases (steam generation), (3) catalytic oxidation of SO2 into sulphur trioxide (SO3) and (4) absorption of SO3 in strong acid (H2SO4).
For convenience, this new adjunct cycle is herein referred to as the H2S—H2SO4 cycle.
In aqueous solution, H2S has two dissociation states described by the following reactions:
H2SHS−H+ (1)
HS−+H+S2−+2H+ (2)
In the case of Reaction 1, the value of the logarithmic acid-dissociation constant, pKa, is close to 7 at 25° C. When the pH is the same as the pKa value for this reaction, the concentration of molecular H2S is equal to that of hydrosulphide ion (HS−). For Reaction 2, various pKa values are reported in the literature with perhaps a value of about 13 at 25° C. being the most widely accepted. In any case, any sulphide ion (S2−) present in the spent pulping liquor is converted into hydrosulphide ion at an early stage in the acidification of the liquor. From the point of view of the present invention, the critical reaction is Reaction 1—the conversion of hydrosulphide ion (HS−) into molecular H2S. From the pKa value for Reaction 1, it may be concluded that, in order to convert a large part of the hydrosulphide ion contained in spent pulping liquor into molecular H2S, the pH of the liquor has to be decreased to a value preferably below 7, most preferably below 6.
The H2S—H2SO4 cycle cannot be realized in conjunction with the level of sulphidity employed in the conventional kraft pulping process. At a sulphidity level of 40%, i.e. at the high end of the range typically used in kraft pulping, converting all the sulphide/hydrosulphide in the spent pulping liquor into H2S and then converting all this H2S into H2SO4 would produce enough acid to lower the pH of the original spent pulping liquor to a value of around 10, but no further. With Reaction 1 having a pKa value of around 7, only a very small amount of sulphide/hydrosulphide—almost negligible in comparison to the total amount available—is converted into molecular H2S at pH 10. The higher the sulphidity, the more sulphide/hydrosulphide is available. A significant jump in sulphidity is required in order to reach the sulphidity range in which the H2S—H2SO4 adjunct cycle is feasible. At a sulphidity level somewhere above 50%, a balanced, or nearly balanced, H2S—H2SO4 cycle becomes feasible. It is not possible to specify a universal threshold value for the sulphidity level which enables the H2S—H2SO4 cycle to be feasible. The threshold value is very case-specific depending on a wide range of process parameters. These include the extents of certain side-reactions of sulphide/hydrosulphide, discussed further below.
On the basis of the prior art, it is not to be expected that, in the case of pulping at very high sulphidity, the amount of H2SO4 generated in the H2S—H2SO4 cycle is sufficient to provide most, if not all, of that required for the acidification step. Firstly, given the problem of developing a method for recovering pulping chemicals from spent pulping liquor of higher-than-normal sulphidity, a solution based on the novel H2S—H2SO4 cycle, which is impossible to realize at normal sulphidity, is not likely to enter the mind of a person skilled in the art. Secondly, although it is true that higher-sulphidity black liquors contain more sulphide (S2−) and/or hydrosulphide ions (HS−) and thus these liquors have the potential to release more H2S, the presence of more S2/HS− ions also means that more acid is needed to react with those ions in order to release the H2S associated with them. Thirdly, as presented in more detail below, S2−/HS− ions are consumed in a number of reactions during pulping and recovery operations, and, on the basis of the prior art, it is difficult to predict the extents of some of these reactions even at normal sulphidity levels. On the basis of the prior art, it is extremely difficult, or even impossible, to predict the extents of all these reactions under conditions of higher-than-normal sulphidity. Overall, if a person skilled in the art were to assume anything, it would be that achieving a balanced H2S—H2SO4 cycle at high sulphidity is not likely to be any easier than it is at normal sulphidity.
Although the use of Na2S as a pulping chemical has a major influence on pulping chemistry, the delignification reactions, as such, do not lead to a measurable net consumption of sulphide/hydrosulphide. In kraft-type pulping, sulphide/hydrosulphide is consumed to some extent in the following types of side-reactions (shown for the case of hydrosulphide):
Lignin demethylation: Lignin-OCH3+HS−→Lignin-O−+CH3SH (3)
{plus follow-on reaction: Lignin-OCH3+CH3S−→Lignin-O−+(CH3)2S} (4)
Sulphur combining organically with lignin;stoichiometric representation(actual reactions unknown): Lignin+HS−+OH−→Lignin-S+H2O (5)
Oxidation: 2HS−+2O2→S2O32−+H2O (6)
HS−+OH−+3/2O2→SO32−+H2O (7)
Reactions 3 and 4, which yield sulphur containing gas compounds, are not problematic from the point of view of the present invention because, in preferred embodiments of the invention, these gases are collected and inputted into the H2S—H2SO4 cycle together with the sulphur gases released during acidification of the spent pulping liquor. Reactions 5, 6 and 7, on the other hand, reduce the amount of sulphide/hydrosulphide that is available for conversion into H2S through acidification of the spent pulping liquor. Fortunately, only a relatively small part of the total sulphide/hydrosulphide in the pulping liquor is consumed in Reactions 5, 6 and 7.
Reactions 5, 6 and 7 are most problematic in the case when the sulphidity level employed in the pulping stage is at or near 100%. In the absence of these side-reactions, the H2S—H2SO4 cycle could, in this case, be operated with little or no addition of make-up H2SO4. In other words, the amount of sulphur in the collected gases would be close to the amount of sulphur in the H2SO4 employed for acidifying the spent pulping liquor. However, Reactions 5, 6 and 7 all increase the need for make-up H2SO4 when the pulping sulphidity is at or near 100%.
At somewhat lower sulphidities, Reactions 5, 6 and 7 are less problematic. In a typical embodiment of the present invention employing a sulphidity level around 80%, a balanced, or nearly balanced, H2S—H2SO4 cycle is possible despite the occurrence of Reactions 5, 6 and 7. As discussed further below, the spent pulping liquor need not be acidified to as low a pH as that required in the 100% sulphidity case. In other words, less H2SO4 is required.
Looking to the new method as a whole, it can be stated that the amount of H2SO4 that is generated from H2S released during the acidification of the spent pulping liquor, when such H2S is preferably further augmented by sulphur gases released in other pulp-mill operations, is typically sufficient to provide from 75% to 100% of the acid required for the previously mentioned acidification step.
Incorporation of the H2S—H2SO4 adjunct cycle results in a large part, or all, of the both the hydrosulphide ion and the sulphide ion in the spent pulping liquor being replaced by sulphate ion. The reaction between sodium hydrosulphide (NaHS) and H2SO4 is the following:
2NaHS+H2SO4→Na2SO4+2H2S (8)
Sulphur is not released to a significant extent from sulphate salts during subsequent combustion of the spent pulping liquor. This, in turn, means that the combustion of the liquor can be carried out in a recovery boiler—of similar type to the boiler employed in the conventional kraft recovery process—without excessive emission of SO2. In other words, incorporation of the new H2S—H2SO4 adjunct cycle overcomes the earlier obstacle and allows the chemicals employed in kraft-type pulping at very high sulphidities to be recovered in a cost-effective way.
When the sulphidity employed in the pulping stage is at or near 100%, all, or nearly all, of the sodium in the spent pulping liquor needs to be in the form of sodium sulphate (Na2SO4) after the acidification of the liquor. This necessitates that the spent pulping liquor is acidified to a relatively low pH value, e.g. pH 3. In the furnace of the recovery boiler, nearly all this Na2SO4 ends up on the char bed where it is, to a large extent, reduced to Na2S. So the smelt exiting the furnace is mainly composed of Na2S, together with some unreduced Na2SO4. Pulping liquor is prepared by dissolving the smelt in water and/or aqueous solution.
When a somewhat lower sulphidity is employed in the pulping stage, say 80%, it is sufficient to acidify the spent pulping liquor to the extent necessary to convert sodium sulphide/hydrosulphide into H2S and Na2SO4. The final pH need not be as low as in the case of 100% sulphidity and is typically in the range 5-6. In this case, the smelt exiting the recovery furnace contains Na2CO3 in addition to the main component, Na2S, as well as some unreduced Na2SO4, and the liquor produced by dissolving this smelt is not, in general, ready for direct recycling to the pulping stage. As in the conventional kraft recovery process, Na2CO3 should preferably be first converted into NaOH by exploiting the causticization reaction. Thus, in a case where the pulping sulphidity is distinctly less than 100% but nonetheless very high, the recovery process generally still includes a causticization operation and a lime cycle. Note that the required causticizing capacity, and so the capacity of the lime cycle, are much smaller than those in the corresponding recovery process after conventional kraft pulping. (As in the case of conventional alkaline pulping, the lime cycle may be partially or fully opened up thereby reducing the capacity of, or eliminating, the lime kiln.) As already explained above, elimination of the causticization operation and the lime cycle is possible when pulping at a sulphidity level at or near 100%.
In certain embodiments of the present invention, the new adjunct H2S—H2SO4 cycle is applied without any withdrawal of by-products and/or of non-process elements in conjunction with the acidification of the spent pulping liquor. On the other hand, incorporation of the recovery of byproducts and/or the purging of non-process elements is advantageous in many cases. Lignin precipitation is already significant at pH 10, so lignin recovery is readily realized in conjunction with the present invention. Note that there is no need to recovery all the lignin that is precipitated during the acidification steps. Certain lignin fractions may be withdrawn from the recovery cycle, others may be combusted in the recovery boiler. If the purging of a non-process element, such as silicon, is a primary aim, only such precipitate fractions that contain a major portion of the non-process element need be removed from the cycle. The acidification process may be carried out in a stepwise manner. By-products may be recovered and/or non-process elements may be removed after, or in conjunction with, any or all of the steps. The spent pulping liquor is concentrated by evaporation before being combusted in the recovery boiler. The evaporation process may be carried out in one or more steps before and/or after any or all of the acidification steps.
Recovery of aliphatic acids in conjunction with the acidification of the spent pulping liquor is not as straightforward as the recovery of lignin. The reason is the low pH level that must be reached in order to liberate these acids from their sodium salts. Recovery of aliphatic acids is easier in the case of a pulping sulphidity at or near 100%. In this case, the low final pH required in the acidification process, e.g. pH 3, is sufficient to liberate all, or nearly all, of the aliphatic acids from their salts. In the case of a pulping sulphidity around, say, 80%, at least some of the aliphatic acids are still bound to sodium at the final pH, e.g. pH 5, employed in the acidification stage. In this case, a cost-effective way to recover aliphatic acids might incorporate the use of purchased H2SO4 to further lower the pH of a part of the pulping liquor from e.g. pH 5 to e.g. pH 3.
Although both the recovery boiler and the recovery-boiler process employed in conjunction with the present method have many features in common with the recovery boiler and recovery-boiler process employed at a conventional kraft pulp mill, there are some clear differences as well. Firstly, as a result of a much higher proportion of Na2S in the smelt, endothermic reduction reactions in the char bed consume more heat than in the corresponding conventional process. Thus—in the recovery boiler at least—less heat is recovered as steam. On the other hand, this deficit is at least partially offset by steam generated in conjunction with the conversion of sulphur containing gases into H2SO4. In cases where significant amounts of by-products are recovered in connection with the acidification of the spent pulping liquor, the ratio of combustibles to inorganics in the final spent pulping liquor is clearly lower than the corresponding ratio in the typical spent pulping liquor of the conventional kraft process. In order to achieve an acceptable combustion temperature in the recovery boiler in the case of significant by-product recovery, use of auxiliary fuel in the boiler may be necessary.
In one embodiment of the invention, the spent pulping liquor from the pulping stage is split into two or more streams and one or more by-products and/or one or more non-process elements are removed to different extents from the different spent pulping liquor streams before possible recombination of the streams further downstream.
In another embodiment employing a split of the spent pulping liquor stream, the stream is split into two, but in this case only one of these streams is acidified according to the new method. The acidified stream is, after possible recovery of by-products and/or removal of non-process elements, recombined with the other stream at some location upstream of the recovery boiler. The idea behind this embodiment is that the SO2 level in the flue gas of the recovery boiler can be kept at an acceptably low level if the content of S2−/HS− in the recombined spent pulping liquor stream is not significantly higher than it is in the case of pulping at conventional sulphidity levels. With a conventional level of S2−/HS− in the liquor fired in the boiler, the extent of capture of the sulphur released into the gas stream in the furnace will be similar to that encountered in a conventional kraft recovery furnace. This situation is, for example, approached if (1) pulping is carried out at a sulphidity level of about 80%, (2) the pulping liquor is split into two streams of roughly equal flow, (3) the new method is applied to only one of the streams and (4) the two streams are recombined prior to combustion in the recovery boiler. Obviously, the split ratio for the spent pulping liquor may be fine-tuned to ensure that the S2−/HS− content in the black liquor to be fired in the boiler does not exceed the critical level. Compared to some of the other embodiments of the new method, operations in the evaporation and recovery-boiler areas deviate less from those of a conventional kraft mill.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the pulping process at very high sulphidity is employed to complement a conventional kraft pulping process. The pulping process at very high sulphidity may, in this case, be applied in parallel with the conventional kraft pulping process or, for example, it may be applied as a pre-pulping step, possibly combined with an impregnation operation, prior to the conventional kraft pulping process. The spent pulping liquor exiting the pulping stage operated at very high sulphidity is subjected to the recovery method of the present invention and, preferably, one or more byproducts are recovered from this liquor. Further downstream, this spent pulping liquor is combined with the spent pulping liquor from the conventional kraft pulping stage and, after any necessary concentration of the combined spent pulping liquor, the combined liquor is combusted in a recovery boiler. The regeneration of the pulping liquors requires an extra operation in this embodiment. Namely, the liquor stream arising from the dissolution of the smelt exiting the recovery boiler needs to be split into a liquor of conventional sulphidity, e.g. 35%, and a liquor of very high sulphidity. One of the ways to achieve this split exploits crystallization in conjunction with evaporation. The split may be realized before or after the causticization operation.
In a case where the pulping sulphidity is distinctly less than 100% but nonetheless very high, finding a sulphidity level which leads to a balanced H2S—H2SO4 cycle is relatively straightforward. If a sulphidity level of 80% is expected to be suitable, this level would be applied initially. In the start-up phase, purchased H2SO4 would be used for the acidification of the spent pulping liquor. If, after some time, it becomes evident that the amount of H2S and other sulphur containing gases is insufficient for generating the required amount of H2SO4, more purchased H2SO4 would be inputted to the cycle. The additional H2SO4 input would also increase the steady-state sulphidity level in the main recovery cycle. In this way, the sulphidity level required for a balanced H2S—H2SO4 cycle—a sulphidity somewhat greater than 80% in this example—would be established. Conversely, should excess H2SO4 be generated in the H2S—H2SO4 cycle, some of the acid would be withheld and a steady-state sulphidity level somewhat lower than that of the initial 80% level would be established.
At a conventional kraft pulping mill, tall-oil soap is often separated from the spent pulping liquor at some stage during the concentration of the liquor by evaporation. The tall-oil soap thus separated is usually acidified, and usually using H2SO4, in order to recover the by-product, tall oil. Recovery of tall oil may be carried out in conjunction with recovery processes incorporating the new method. Obviously, since a significant amount of internally produced acid is provided by the new method, there is a possibility to achieve savings in production costs compared to those of tall-oil recovery at a conventional kraft pulping mill.
The present new method is described in more detail with reference to the drawings,
The embodiment depicted in
Another embodiment, exploiting a pulping sulphidity at or near 100% sulphidity, has many features in common with that depicted in
The embodiment depicted in
The embodiment depicted in
Mass flows of the main components in various streams of an example recovery process incorporating the new method are given in the following Tables 1-5. The example recovery process does not incorporate withdrawal of by-products or non-process elements in conjunction with the acidification of the spent pulping liquor. The acidification process is applied to the whole stream of spent pulping liquor. Where applicable, the flows are compared to those of a reference conventional kraft recovery process. In the case of the new method, pulping of softwood is carried out at 80% sulphidity and 17.5% EA (effective alkali as NaOH on wood), while, in the reference process, softwood pulping is carried out at 35% sulphidity and 19.5% EA. Other key assumptions are: (1) Na2S is completely hydrolyzed in the pulping liquor, i.e. sulphide is completely converted to hydrosulphide according to Reaction 2, (2) the reduction efficiency in the recovery furnace is 95% and (3) the causticization degree is 85%. The unit of mass flow is kg per air-dried metric ton of pulp (kg/ADt).
The embodiments of the present invention are not limited to those mentioned or described herein.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20135105 | Feb 2013 | FI | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/FI2014/050082 | 2/3/2014 | WO | 00 |
