The present invention relates to a method for recuperating potential energy during a lowering operation of a load. The invention is especially applied in operation of a work machine.
The term “work machine” comprises different types of material handling vehicles like construction machines, such as a wheel loader, an excavator, a backhoe loader and a dump truck (such as an articulated hauler). A work machine is provided with a bucket, container or other type of work implement for carrying/transporting a load. Further terms frequently used for work machines are “earth-moving machinery”, “off-road work machines” and “construction equipment”.
In connection with transportation of heavy loads, e.g. in contracting work, work machines are frequently used. A work machine may be operated with large and heavy loads in areas where there are no roads, for example for transports in connection with road or tunnel building, sand pits, mines and similar environments.
The invention will be described below for a wheel loader. This should be regarded as a non-limiting example of a work machine. The wheel loader comprises a driveline for propelling the machine via the wheels. A power source, such as an internal combustion engine, and especially a diesel engine, is adapted to provide the power for propelling the wheel loader. The wheel loader further comprises a hydraulic system for performing certain work functions, such as lifting and tilting a work implement and steering the machine. The power source is also adapted to provide the power for controlling the hydraulic work functions. More specifically, one or more hydraulic pumps are driven by the power source in order to provide hydraulic actuators (such as hydraulic cylinders) with pressurized hydraulic fluid.
In order to recuperate potential energy, the hydraulic system may comprise a hydraulic machine which is adapted to function as both pump and motor. More precisely, the hydraulic machine functions as a pump in a lifting operation and supplies pressurized hydraulic fluid to the hydraulic cylinder. The hydraulic machine functions as a hydraulic motor in a lowering operation and is driven by a pressurized hydraulic fluid flow from the hydraulic cylinder. The lowering operation defines an energy recovery state.
It is desirable to achieve an energy recuperation method for a work machine, which creates conditions for an efficient recuperation of energy during a lowering operation of a load.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a method is provided for recuperating potential energy during a lowering operation of a load, wherein a hydraulic system is adapted to lift and lower the load, comprising the steps of
The term “load” here refers to the load exerted on the hydraulic system (especially on the hydraulic actuators) during the lowering operation, which load comprises a load resulting from the weight of a load arm assembly, which is adapted to lift and lower the load, and any external load (payload) carried by the load arm assembly.
Load actuation in different modes of operation creates conditions for hydraulically recuperating a greater portion of the mechanical load power.
Further, the method is designed for determining which of said at least two energy recuperation modes is most energy efficient and responsively selecting the most energy efficient recuperation mode. Further, the selection of energy recuperation mode is performed with respect to the constraints of the specific hydraulic system used with regard to a maximum system pressure etc. The selection of recuperation mode is for example made before initiating the lowering Operation.
According to a preferred embodiment, a first recuperation mode is associated to that a weight of the load is below a predetermined limit and a second recuperation mode is associated to that the load weight is above the predetermined limit.
For example, the predetermined limit represents a load state, in which a load arm assembly, which is adapted to lift and lower the load, is substantially free of any external load. In other words, the predetermined limit may correspond to a sum of the weight of the load arm assembly and a small additional weight corresponding to some stuck material in the load arm assembly etc.
According to a further preferred embodiment, a first recuperation mode is associated to that a load arm assembly, which is adapted to lift and lower the load, is lowered with substantially no external load.
Thus, in this case, only the load arm assembly is lowered after having dumped the external load in a raised position. Such operation is for example used in gravel handling. In gravel handling, the gravel is scooped up from ground level by means of a bucket, the bucket is thereafter raised and the collected gravel dumped in a raised position, for example on a container of a dump truck. The bucket is then returned (lowered) to the initial position for scooping up more gravel.
According to a further preferred embodiment, a second recuperation mode is associated to that a load arm assembly, which is adapted to lift and lower the load, is lowered with a substantial external load.
Such operation is applicable where an external load is collected from a raised position and lowered to a lowered position. This is for example the case in fork handling of pallets, wherein a pallet is collected from a shelf and lowered to ground level before transportation to a destination.
According to a further preferred embodiment, the load arm assembly comprises a work implement adapted to carry the external load. For example, the load arm assembly further comprises a boom, wherein the work implement (such as a bucket or forks) is connected to one end of the boom so that the work implement can be tilted relative to the boom.
According to a further preferred embodiment, the method comprises the step of detecting at least one operational parameter and determining the current operating state in response thereto.
According to one example of the last mentioned embodiment, a first operational parameter is indicative of a load state. Preferably, the current operating state is directly determined in response to the load state. Preferably, the first operational parameter is indicative of a pressure level in the hydraulic system.
According to a further example of the last mentioned embodiment, a second operational parameter is indicative of an operator commanded speed of the lowering motion.
Preferably, the current operating state is directly determined in response to the commanded speed. Especially, both the load state and the commanded speed are used as inputs for determining the operating state. For example, a position of an operator controlled element represents a commanded speed of the lowering motion. The aim is then to recuperate as much energy as possible given a desired actuator speed (commanded by the operator) at a given load acting on the actuator.
According to a further preferred embodiment, the method comprises the step of repeatedly detecting at least one operational parameter during operation in a repeated work cycle, and determining the current operating state based on detected values of the operational parameter during performance of at least one of said work cycles.
For example the current operating state is determined based on detected values of the operational parameter during performance of a plurality of said work cycles. The term “work cycle” comprises a movement of a work implement, such as a bucket, (lifting/lowering operation) and possibly any route of the work machine (ie the work cycle travel path) between a load collecting destination and a load release destination. The operational parameter is preferably only detected during the load lowering part of the work cycle. According to a first work cycle example, a wheel loader typically drives into a heap of material, lifts the bucket, reverses out of the heap, turns and is forwarded towards a dump truck where it unloads the material onto the container of the dump truck. After unloading, the bucket is lowered and the wheel loader returns to the starting position.
According to a further development of the last mentioned embodiment, the method comprises the step of repeatedly detecting said at least one operational parameter during operation in one of said at least two energy recuperation modes in the repeated work cycle, determining which of said at least two energy recuperation modes is most energy efficient for the specific work cycle, and responsively selecting the most energy efficient recuperation mode. The hydraulic system is controlled according to the selected energy recuperation mode in subsequent work cycles.
According to a preferred example, the hydraulic system comprises a hydraulic cylinder, which is configured to lift and lower the load, wherein the method comprises the step of controlling a flow from a piston side in the hydraulic cylinder during the lowering operation. Especially, a first energy recuperation mode involves controlling a flow communication between a piston-rod side and a piston side in the hydraulic cylinder during the lowering operation in a so-called differential mode. By using the differential mode, the flow to the pump may be reduced with about 30% with regard to a normal mode (in which there is no fluid flow connection between the piston-side and the piston-rod side). Thus, the pump size may be reduced. The differential mode causes a pressure increase in the system due to the area relationship in the cylinder. A relationship of 0.7 leads to a pressure increase with a factor in the magnitude of 3.3.
According to a first alternative, where higher lowering speed is required relative to what can be achieved in the normal mode due to the limited pump size, part of the flow may be throttled directly to tank if operation in the differential mode would result in a too high pressure level. This mode may be referred to as normal mode with meter-out flow control.
According to a second alternative, a valve is arranged in a line between the piston-side and the piston-rod side and the flow is throttled by means of the valve. In this way, the pressure level is limited. This mode is defined as a semi-differential mode. The power throttled away (pressure*flow) will be substantially smaller for high lowering speeds in the semi-differential mode compared to operation in the normal mode with meter-out flow control in case only a marginal pA-pB is required to stay below the maximum pressure level.
Similarly, in case of higher loads, the power throttled away (pressure*flow) will be substantially smaller in the normal mode with meter-out flow control where only a marginal meter out flow is required to achieve the desired lowering speed compared to operation in the semi-differential mode at the same operating point.
Further preferred embodiments of the invention are described in the following description.
The invention will be explained below, with reference to the embodiments shown on the appended drawings, wherein
The wheel loader 101 comprises an equipment 111 for handling an external load, such as objects or material. The equipment 111 comprises a load-arm unit 106 and an implement 107 in the form of a bucket fitted on the load-arm unit. A first end of the load-arm unit 106 is pivotally connected to the front vehicle section 102.
The implement 107 is pivotally connected to a second end of the load-arm unit 106.
The load-arm unit 106 can be raised and lowered relative for the front section 102 of the vehicle by-means of two second actuators in the form of two hydraulic cylinders 108,109, each of which is connected at one end to the front vehicle section 102 and at the other end to the load-arm unit 106. The bucket 107 can be tilted relative to the load-arm unit 106 by means of a third actuator in the form of a hydraulic cylinder 110, which is connected at one end to the front vehicle section 102 and at the other end to the bucket 107 via a link-arm system 115.
With reference to
When the excavation is finished, the wheel loader 101 is retreated from the excavating operation position at a high speed in for example a reverse second speed gear, see arrow 204 and the wheel loader is turned to the right (or to the left), see arrow 205. The wheel loader 101 then moves forward, see arrow 206, while turning hard to the left (or right), then straightens out the vehicle to travel to approach the dump truck 220 at a high speed, see arrow 207. The lifting arm unit 106 is raised, the bucket 107 tilted and the material is deposited on the container of the articulated hauler. When a loading operation of the dump truck 220 is finished, the empty bucket is lowered, the wheel loader 101 moves away in reverse from the dump truck 220 at a high speed, see arrow 208, turns to a stop position and is driven forwards again 210 towards the natural ground 201.
The hydraulic machine 305 therefore functions as a pump in a first operating state and supplies pressurized hydraulic fluid to the hydraulic cylinder 108. The hydraulic machine 305 also functions as a hydraulic motor in a second operating state and is driven by a hydraulic fluid flow from the hydraulic cylinder. Preferably, the pump 305 is an open-circuit, cross-center pump fully displacable in both directions.
The hydraulic machine 305 is connected to a piston side 309 of the hydraulic cylinder 108 via a first hydraulic conduit 311. A first valve 313, below referred to as the A-P valve, is arranged on the first conduit 311 for controlling the fluid flow. The A-P valve 313 is formed by a bi-directional proportional valve.
A piston rod side 315 of the hydraulic cylinder 108 is connected to a tank 317 via a second hydraulic conduit 319. A second valve 321, below referred to as the B-T valve, is arranged on the second conduit 319 for controlling the fluid flow. The B-T valve 321 is formed by an anti-cavitation check valve.
The piston side 309 of the hydraulic cylinder 108 is connected to the tank 317 via a third hydraulic conduit 323. A third valve 325, below referred to as the A-T valve, is arranged on the third conduit 323 for controlling the fluid flow. The A-T valve 325 is formed by an anti-cavitation check valve.
The hydraulic machine 305 is connected to the piston rod side 315 of the hydraulic cylinder 108 via a fourth hydraulic conduit 327. A fourth valve 329, below referred to as the B-P valve, is arranged on the fourth conduit 327 for controlling the fluid. The B-P valve 329 is formed by a bi-directional proportional valve.
A first pressure sensor 331 is adapted to sense the pressure in the piston side 309 of the hydraulic cylinder 108. A second pressure sensor 333 is adapted to sense the pressure in the piston rod side 315 of the hydraulic cylinder 108. A third pressure sensor 333 is adapted to sense the pressure in an output side of the pump 305.
The hydraulic system 301 further comprises a pump control means 335 and a valve control means 337. They can be of conventional design and will not be further described here. The pump is preferably capable of alternating between pressure and flow control but will not be further described here. The hydraulic system 301 further comprises a controller 337, which is operatively connected to the pressure sensors 331, 333, 334 for receiving pressure signals. The controller 337 is further operatively connected to the pump control means 335 and the valve control means 337 for controlling them according to a control strategy, which will be further described below. Further, an operator controlled element 339, preferably in the form of a joystick, is operatively connected to the controller 337, wherein the controller receives operator command signals.
The load case of interest is the recuperative motion where load force and actuator speed (hydraulic cylinder speed) has the same direction. The direction of interest is when flow leaves the cylinder piston chamber. This situation is marked with a circle in
The hydraulic cylinder 108 (an asymmetric cylinder) can be actuated either with or without its chambers hydraulically connected to each other, here referred to as the differential or normal operational state of a cylinder. In either state the maximum hydraulic power must not be exceeded. By controlling pressure in the differential case—or flow in the normal case it is possible to achieve the same actuator speed at the same load force by choosing different modes of operation. The control strategy is adapted to yield the highest possible efficiency in energy recuperation.
The sets of combinations in having the four valves 313, 321, 325, 329 individually opened or closed are here referred to as control modes. However, not all of these combinations make sense from a control perspective. Depending on the cylinder load and desired actuator speed one mode is usually better than another, regarding the energy efficiency in recuperation. In table 1 the rules for which mode is achievable given a certain speed (v) and force (F) couple. The limits in load force and actuator velocity in the normal (index n) and differential (index d) state, expressed in maximum allowable system pressure ps,maχ piston area A and maximum machine flow qm,max are given by:
where K is the cylinder area ratio.
This can also be graphically represented over the working region in load force (F) and desired actuator speed (v), see
According to a first, exemplary control strategy, the differential mode is always selected when initiating a lowering motion if this is allowed by the current pressure level. This is usually possible (depending on the cylinder area ratio) when lowering an empty bucket (which is usually the case when the wheel loader is used to load gravel, see description above with regard to
When the joystick signal is zero and the displacement sensor indicates a relative pump displacement close to zero, all the valves will be closed. This mode should preferably always be activated before differential or normal mode is entered.
In the mode “Down normal” the machine is always capable of lowering loads up to the maximum specified loading capacity. When receiving a negative joystick signal the controller verifies that the pressure in the A-chamber is higher than the pressure in B-chamber and the pump pressure lies within a specified limit. The pump operates as motor during “down normal”.
If the regulator confirms the following conditions the “Down normal” mode is selected and entered:
Lift/Tilt:
The mode “Down differential” makes it possible to lower the bucket with a higher speed than down normal. The concept of differential lowering is to open the B-P valve and the A-P valve to connect the two chambers, this result in that oil from the A-chamber is used to refill the B-chamber and the remaining oil exits to pump. The oil that exits through pump equals the volume of the cylinder rod. It also results in a pressure increase since the load now rests on the area of the cylinder rod. The pressure increase depends on the area ratio of the cylinder which may differ in the lift and tilt drive. The pressure increase in some cases makes it inappropriate to use the differential mode, as this would damage the system. If the load pressure times the pressure increase factor exceeds the maximum allowed pressure, differential lowering is not allowed. Before the differential lowering is started a “pre-differential condition” has to be fulfilled (this is only necessary in case the semi differential mode is not supported for in hardware).
If the controller confirms the following conditions the “Down differential” mode is entered:
Lift/Tilt:
To enable the differential lowering mode, it is important that maximum differential pressure does not exceed maximum system pressure. Therefore the pressure after entering differential mode has to be calculated and compared to the maximum system pressure. This is done by measuring the pressure when the operator touches the joystick and then calculates what the resulting pressure in differential mode will become given that measured pressure and the cylinder area ratio, K. If the calculated resulting pressure is lower than the maximum system pressure the pump must be actively controlled to meet the load pressure prior to opening the A-P valve. When this is achieved, the “Pre-differential lowering” parameter is set to 1 and the “Down differential” mode is allowed.
The meter-out function makes it possible to lower the bucket with a higher speed than the ordinary normal mode and eventually also a higher speed than the differential lowering mode would allow. If the pump is saturated (maximum negative relative-displacement) but the lowering speed is still to low, the A-T valve is proportionally controlled to achieve the desired lowering speed. In order to control the A-T valve the “flow that exits trough pump” and the “required lowering speed” are calculated.
When the joystick signal is negative the meter out regulator calculates three parameters, “flow that must exit the cylinder”, “required pump flow” and “A-T flow”. If the required pump flow is not achievable the excess flow will be equal to the calculated A-T flow which is used to generate the control signal for the A-T valve.
(If the calculated value of AT is less than zero it means that the pump is capable of handling the flow from cylinder at desired lowering speed and the parameter is therefore set to zero. Otherwise the A-T valve is continuously controlled by an algorithm to achieve desired lowering speed.)
If the controller confirms the following conditions the “Down normal meter-out” function is entered:
Lift/Tilt:
If the controller confirms the following conditions the “Down differential meter-out” function is entered: Lift/Tilt
According to a further example, the control strategy comprises a Pre meter-out mode (increased smoothness and response). This function is implemented to achieve the best possible response of a lowering in lift or tilt mode. The A-T valve between load side and tank is continuously controlled in a proportional manner. If all conditions required to start a lowering motion are fulfilled a smooth start can be achieved by initially controlling flow over the valves. Meanwhile, the pump is pressure controlled until the load pressure has been reached; thereafter velocity control is taken over by the pump. This measure yields an improved system response time, with only a minor power loss as a consequence.
When joystick signal is negative and the previous mode is “stop”, the algorithm continuously controls the opening of either the A-T or A-P valve in order to rapidly get the motion going.
If the regulator confirms the following conditions the “Pre meter-out” function is entered:
Lift/Tilt:
In case the differential mode is active, and the load pressure rises above the limit for the differential mode, pressure control can be applied. By taking this measure the pressure in the A-chamber can be maintained at a maximum value. This of course only happens if this mode is supported for in hardware (B-P valve capable of pressure control). How this works is illustrated in
According to a further development of the control strategy described above, a so-called adaptive solution will be explained below. This strategy can still involve some or all of the modes described above.
Either the differential mode or the normal mode can be chosen for any working condition. This makes it interesting to choose the most efficient mode before the motion is initialized. The selection of mode is made adaptive by creating conditions for changing the control strategy after analyzing historical measurement data.
This strategy does not require any further sensors. Input to the calculation is pressure and joystick signal. Output is which mode should be selected when starting a lowering (recuperative) motion.
The fundamental steps in such a controller are shown by
It would also be appropriate to have the possibility to manually turn off the differential state selection. This could be an advantage in some fields of applications where the load dynamics is of high importance. The differential state of operation leads to a significantly lower resonance frequency which in some cases in not desired, for example when precision in actuation is of high importance.
The controller 337 is commonly known as a central processing unit (CPU) or an electronic control module (ECM) for an electronic control of the vehicle operation. In a preferred embodiment, the control unit comprises a microprocessor. The control unit 337 comprises a memory, which in turn comprises a computer program with computer program segments, or a program code, for implementing the control method when the program is run. This computer program can be transmitted to the control unit in various ways via a transmission signal, for example by downloading from another computer, via wire and/or wirelessly, or by installation in a memory circuit. In particular, the transmission signal can be transmitted via the Internet.
The hydraulic system is preferably adapted for being able to lower the load at about twice the speed of lifting the load. Further, the control method creates conditions for minimizing the pump size. With regard to conventional work machine systems with pump-controlled lifting/lowering, a very large pump is required in order to handle the large flow during the lowering motion.
According to the control method, the motor will operate at a higher pressure as often as possible, where it usually has a higher efficiency. Thus, it is an efficient way of recuperating the available potential energy.
The invention is not in any way limited to the above described embodiments, instead a number of alternatives and modifications are possible without departing from the scope of the following claims.
According to one example, the recuperated potential energy during the lowering operation is preferably transferred to a power consuming system, such as the work machine powertrain. The recuperated potential energy during the lowering operation is preferably transferred to the power source (diesel engine). According to an alternative, the recuperated potential energy during the lowering operation is transferred to other hydraulic functions, such as the steering or tilting function. According to a further alternative, the recuperated potential energy is transferred to a cooling fan motor. The recuperated potential energy transferred to the power consuming system is preferably simultaneously consumed in the power consuming system.
According to another example, a primary mover (electrical machine) of the hydraulic machine could be coupled to an electric hybrid system with energy storage capabilities.
Additionally, it should be noted that the essence of the suggested control strategies is not only applicable to the open circuit solution but to all hydraulic recuperative solutions where an asymmetric cylinder is used along with four separate valves.
In
For example, the control method may be performed via a control system for a work machine, the system comprises a hydraulic machine and at least one hydraulic cylinder which is configured to lift and lower a load, the hydraulic machine being connected to a piston side of the hydraulic cylinder via a first line and a piston-rod side of the hydraulic cylinder via a second line, the hydraulic machine being adapted to supply the hydraulic cylinder with pressurized hydraulic fluid from a tank in a lifting operation and to be driven by a hydraulic fluid flow from the hydraulic cylinder in a lowering operation, the hydraulic machine is mechanically connected to a power consuming system for transferring recuperated potential energy during the lowering operation to the power consuming system.
According to an alternative method for recuperating potential energy during a lowering operation of a load, wherein a hydraulic cylinder is configured to lift and lower the load, the method comprises the steps of mechanically transferring the recuperated potential energy from a hydraulic machine, which is driven by a hydraulic fluid flow from the hydraulic cylinder during the lowering operation, to a power consuming system and simultaneously consuming the recuperated energy in the power consuming system. This alternative method can be combined with any steps of the control method described above.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0701248 | May 2007 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2008/000215 | 3/25/2008 | WO | 00 | 11/17/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/143568 | 11/27/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5784945 | Krone et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6467264 | Stephenson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6502393 | Stephenson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6854268 | Fales et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6880332 | Pfaff et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7614336 | VerKuilen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7634911 | Brinkman | Dec 2009 | B2 |
20030221339 | Naruse et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040035103 | Nagura et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040107699 | Fales et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20060201146 | Tabor | Sep 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1403526 | Mar 2004 | EP |
02090780 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2006088399 | Aug 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for corresponding International Application PCT/SE2008/000215, Feb. 9, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for corresponding International Application PCT/SE2008/000215, Nov. 3, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100154399 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |