The present disclosure belongs to the technical field of resource recovery, and in particular relates to a method for recycling urea-formaldehyde (UF) and raw materials from a wood-based panel, and use thereof.
Global consumption of urea-formaldehyde (UF) (including melamine-UF) reached over 1.4 million tons in 2015. The vast majority of UF was used in the production of wood-based panels, such as high-density fiberboard, medium-density fiberboard, particle board, and plywood. In 2019, about 140 million cubic meters of wood-based panel materials bonded with thermosetting artificial resins such as the UF were produced in China. From a perspective of the product life cycle, a considerable amount of wood-based panels are going to be withdrawn from service annually, and need to be properly disposed of to avoid negative environmental impacts. However, there are no plans globally to recycle these wood-based panels, let alone the UF contained therein. As a product of polymerized condensation on the formaldehyde and urea, UF is the most used resin in wood composite adhesives. However, not many people really realize that the polymerized condensation of UF is actually reversible, and leads to the problem of formaldehyde release from UF products. That is to say, the cross-linking of formaldehyde and urea is not immobilized. Under certain favorable temperature, pH value, and moisture, cross-linked UF is depolymerized, and depolymerized UF can be reused for UF manufacture and wood-based panel production. However, the depolymerized UF that is recycled under unfavorable conditions may change chemical properties of the wood materials glued by this type of UF, thus affecting the normal production of wood-based panels. On one hand, this explains that why currently published patents or technologies related to UF degradation cannot be effectively used in the wood-based panel production. On the other hand, this also indicates that there is a need to find a better depolymerization and separation method of the recycled UF. In this way, the wood raw materials of the depolymerized UF and UF-glued wood-based panel may play a huge potential in the manufacture of new UF and new wood-composited wood-based panel materials.
Aiming at the above technical problems, the present disclosure provides a method for recycling urea-formaldehyde (UF) and raw materials from a wood-based panel, and use thereof.
The present disclosure provides a method for recycling urea-formaldehyde (UF) from a wood-based panel, including the following steps:
The present disclosure further provides use of a recycled UF solid in wood-based panel production, including the following steps:
The present disclosure further provides use of a recycled wood-based panel in production of a new particle board, including the following steps:
Preferably, in step (2), the heat-grinding is conducted at a heat-grinding rate of 1,500 rpm, a heat-grinding temperature of 100° C. to 120° C., and a refiner plate clearance of 0.4 mm to 0.6 mm.
In the present disclosure, about 94% of the UF in the wood-based panel can be recycled by the method. The UF recycled by the method can replace at least 10% of non-recycled UF without affecting performances of the wood-based panel. The UF-glued wood-based panels can be recycled by the method, and a recycled wood-based panel raw material can replace 50% of a non-recycled wood-based raw material for particle board production without affecting performances of the wood-based panel.
A method for recycling UF from a wood-based panel included the following steps:
Use of a recycled UF solid in wood-based panel production included the following steps:
Test of recovery rate of recycled UF were as follows:
The recovery rate of the UF was measured at different temperatures, times, and pH values. The experimental results were as follows:
The experimental results showed that when the recycling was conducted at 50° C., the recovery rate increased from 60% to 68% with the extension of the treatment time from 40 min to 100 min. When the recycling was conducted at 80° C., the recovery rate increased from 74% to 94% with the extension of the treatment time from 40 min to 100 min.
Even under poor treatment conditions, about 60% of the UF in the wood-based panel could still be recycled by the method of the present disclosure. When the recycling was conducted: at 80° C. for 100 min, the recovery rate could reach approximately 94%.
The tensile strength test of recycled UF used in the production of wood-based panel:
A recycled and dissolved UF solution was mixed with a self-made resin under a UF molar ratio of 1.3, and UF 1 was obtained by replacing 5% of a resin solid content according to a conventional UF production process. UF 2 was obtained by replacing 10% of the resin solid content with the recycled and dissolved UF solution and mixed with an industrial UF.
A plywood was separately glued with the UF 1 and the UF 2. The processing parameters included: material: a defect-free poplar veneer with a specific gravity of 0.53 and an average moisture content of 9.3%; glue amount: 200 g/m 2 (gluing on both sides); hot pressing pressure: 5 MPa; hot pressing temperature: 150° C.; hot pressing time: 5 min. This experiment was repeated 6 times. After hot pressing, the prepared plywood samples were stored in the laboratory for 2 d. The plywood samples were submerged in water at 30° C.±3° C. for 2 h, dried in an oven at 63° C.±3° C. for 1 h, and then tested for tensile strength according to GB/T 9846-2015. Test results were shown in Table 1. As a control, the properties of a plywood glued by self-made UF without adding recycled UF and a plywood bonded by industrial UF without any treatment were also listed in the table.
The data showed that the addition of 5% recycled UF did not affect the dry and wet tensile strengths of the tested plywood samples when mixed with self-made UF, although the data showed that the addition of 5% recycled UF tended to increase the dry and wet tensile strengths of the tested plywood samples compared to the control UF.
The data also showed that the addition of 10% recycled UF did not affect the dry tensile strengths of the tested plywood samples when mixed with the industrial UF, although the data showed that the addition of 10% recycled UF tended to increase the dry tensile strength of the tested plywood samples compared to the control UF.
Compared with the national standard, all plywood samples containing recycled UF had the tensile strength meeting the requirement of the third-grade plywood of GB/T9846-2015. This showed that the recycled UF in the production of new plywood did not affect the properties of the plywood or the performances of the UF. Therefore, it is feasible to use recycled UF in the production of wood-composited wood-based panels.
[1] Use of a recycled wood-based panel in production of a new particle board included the following steps:
A preferred result is that in step (2), the heat-grinding is conducted at a heat-grinding rate of 1,500 rpm, a heat-grinding temperature of 100° C. to 120° C., and a refiner plate clearance of 0.4 mm to 0.6 mm.
The specific raw materials, the preparation and hot pressing conditions, as well as the performance test results of an obtained particle board (thickness expansion rate, water absorption, flexural strength, flexural modulus of elasticity, and internal bonding strength) were listed in Table 2 and Table 3.
Table 2 listed the experimental operating parameters of a general particle board. Table 3 presented the performance data of a particle board containing 50% of recycled particle board raw materials. The same table also listed the heat-grinding parameters for preparing the recycled particle board raw materials. Table 3 showed that by using the experimental operating parameters of the particle board listed in Table 2, when a density of the experimental product was about 750 kg/m3, 50% of the recycled particle board raw materials produced at a heat-grinding rate of 1,500 rpm, a heat-grinding temperature of 100° C. to 120° C., and a refiner plate clearance of 0.4 mm were added during the particle board production, the recycled particle board raw materials could make the performance of the produced particle board meet the requirements of GB/T4897-2015 for P6-grade particle boards. Table 3 also showed that a particle board using the recycled particle board raw materials after heat-grinding as a core layer had higher internal bonding strength and flexural strength, as well as lower thickness expansion rate and water absorption compared to those of the particle board obtained by non-recycled UF-glued particle board raw materials in the control. This illustrated the advantages of particle board produced with the listed heat-grinding parameters. The above results prove that the recycled UF-glued particle board raw materials for particle board production do not affect the quality of particle board, and it is feasible for the recycled UF-glued particle board raw materials to be used for particle board production to manufacture new particle boards.
More specifically, 50% of the recycled UF-glued particle board raw materials were placed in a core layer of a newly manufactured particle board. Moreover, the raw material of the particle board core layer is produced at a heat-grinding rate of 1,500 rpm, a heat-grinding temperature of 100° C. to 120° C., a preheating time of 1 min, and a refiner plate clearance of 0.4 mm. Furthermore, the particle board is manufactured with a hot pressing temperature of 180° C., a hot pressing time of 150 sec, and a hot pressing pressure of 4.8 MPa, under a particle board density of 688 kg/m3, 10% glue and 1% paraffin on the surface layers of the particle board, and 8% glue and 1% paraffin on the core layer of the particle board, and the quality of the particle board meets the requirements of GB/T4897-2015 for P6-grade panels.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20020153107 | Roffael | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030056873 | Nakos | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20060254731 | Jawaid | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20190241713 | Sothje | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200122438 | Stadler | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20230002584 | Fechter | Jan 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103157653 | Jun 2013 | CN |
109485811 | Mar 2019 | CN |
108753221 | Nov 2020 | CN |
114290472 | Apr 2022 | CN |
Entry |
---|
Translation CN 11490472A (Year: 2022). |
Translation CN 108753221B (Year: 2020). |