The invention relates to a method for reducing erosion on a hillside that is caused by moving water.
Erosion is the loss of soil. Soil erosion is a significant environmental problem. The major cause of erosion on hillsides is moving water. Usually rainfall is the source of that water.
When rain falls on a hill, gravity causes the water to flow down the hill. As the speed of the flowing water increases the amount of soil loss increases. Trees and other vegetation that are growing on the hillside resist and slow the downward movement of the water thereby reducing the amount of soil loss and erosion. Consequently, vegetation is often planted on hillsides to reduce erosion. Not only will the grass, fescue and leaves help to slow down raindrops as they fall, the roots of the plants will also help to hold the soil together.
Rain water can infiltrate the soil through pores, as long as they are not saturated. Excess water moves as overland flow (“runoff”) down slope and detaches additional soil particles. When runoff is evenly distributed, sheet erosion occurs. Water usually tends to concentrate along the lowest parts of a soil surface and forms small, shallow channels called rills. Overland flow that concentrates in channels leads to the formation of rills and gullies. Rills are small channels, less than 8 inches deep and less than 2 feet wide. Larger channels are known as gullies. If unchecked, rills may extend into the subsoil resulting in gully erosion.
Rills are very common in agricultural areas because sustained agriculture depletes the soil of much of its organic content, increasing the erodibility of the soil. Agricultural machines, such as tractors, compact the soil to the point where water flows over the surface rather than seeping into the soil. Tractor wheel impressions often channel water, providing a perfect environment for the generation of rills. If left alone, these rills may erode considerable amounts of arable soil. Some estimates claim rill flow has a carrying capacity of nearly ten times that of non-rill areas. In a moderate rainfall, rill flow can carry rock fragments up to 9 cm in diameter downslope. In 1987, scientist J. Poesen conducted an experiment on the Huldenberg field in Belgium which revealed that during a moderate rainfall, rill erosion removed as much as 200 kg (in submerged weight) of rock. Poesen, J. 1987. “Transport of Rock Fragments by Rill Flow—A Field Study”, Catena Supplement 8. W. Germany: Catena Verlag. 35-54.
Farmers and other property owners have a variety of methods available to prevent or reduce erosion. These methods include creating terraces and providing barriers to stop or divert the water away from selected areas.
Diversion structures are sometimes used to control gully erosion. These structures cause water to flow along a desired path and away from areas at high risk for erosion. Diversion structures are constructed above the gully area to direct run-off away from gully heads, and discharge the water into natural waterways or vegetated watercourses, or onto rock outcrops and stable areas which are not susceptible to erosion. Surface water must not be diverted over unprotected areas or it will cause new gullies. The basic aim of diversions is to reduce the surface water entering into the gully through gully heads and along gully edges, and to protect critical planted areas from being washed away.
In gully control, temporary physical structural measures such as gully reshaping, brushwood, sandbag, loose stone, gabion and arc-weir check-dams are used to dissipate the energy of runoff and to keep the stability of the gully. Check-dams are constructed across the gully bed to stop channel/bed erosion. By reducing the original gradient of the gully channel, check-dams diminish the velocity of water flow of runoff and the erosive power of runoff. Run-off during peak flow is conveyed safely by check-dams. Temporary check-dams, which have a life-span of three to eight years, collect and hold soil and moisture in the bottom of the gully. To give vegetation an opportunity to establish, runoff control structures may be needed in the gully. The structures can be either temporary or permanent. The choice of the measures and extent of their use will depend on the amount of the runoff and the status of the gully whether young and actively eroding or mature.
While the use of physical structures to control gully erosion is well-known, the creation and placement of these structures is often time consuming and expensive. Gabion is a wirework container filled with rock, broken concrete, or other material, used in the construction of dams and retaining walls. The cages are typically made of 3-inch mesh and are sold in a range of sizes. The industry standard is 3-foot increments. These containers cost about $35 per cubic yard (a 3-foot-square cage) for standard-gauge galvanized mesh. Because of their size and weight one must either uses a crane or more than one person to place a gabion in a desired location. The best time to stop gully erosion is when the gullies are small. Gabion structures are too large for use in small gullies. While sand bags are available in smaller sizes that weigh less, sandbags block water flow that can result in the formation of a new gulley extending away from the sandbags. Loose stone placed in a gully will either wash away if the stones are small or act a dam if the stones are large.
While the art has focused its efforts on controlling and filling gullies to reduce erosion a better way to reduce hillside erosion is to stop gulley formation. Consequently, there is a need for a method of stopping or preventing gulley formation that is simple, effective and can be implemented by a single person. The method should not require the single person to use cranes or other tools.
I provide a method for reducing erosion of a hillside that can be easily performed by a single person. The method is simple, yet effective, and is best implemented when a rill is first discovered.
I provide flexible, rock-filled mesh bags that are sufficiently small in size and weight that they can be easily carried by a person of average size and strength. The openings in the mesh bags and the size of the rocks in the bags are selected so the water can pass through the bags but when placed in a rill or gully the speed of the water flowing through the bag will be reduced.
Each opening in the mesh bag has a major diameter of between ⅛ inches and ¾ inches depending on the sizes of rocks enclosed and a minor diameter which is less than or equal to the major diameter. The rocks in the mesh bag preferably have a size in which a largest diameter of the rock is between ¼ and 1.5 inches. Larger rills may need larger stones to allow better erosion control.
The mesh bags can be made of any suitable material including natural materials like hemp or cotton rope or a plastic, such as nylon, polypropylene or polyethylene or reinforced plastic or metal. If the bags will be used in an area where a tractor or other equipment could run over them then a stronger material like nylon should be used. Usually, the top of the mesh bag will be exposed to direct sunlight when the bag is put in place. So the bag should be made of material that is resistant to ultra-violet and other solar radiation. For that reason I prefer to use a material containing a UV stabilizer for making the mesh bags.
The bag must be flexible, so that it conforms to the sides and bottom of the rill. Each bag should contain rocks of different size. The smaller stones will naturally be moved to the bottom of the bag during transport or when in use. There, they will engage the bottom surface of the rill and inhibit further erosion. Flexibility may be provided by putting “pleats” or “wrinkles” in the bag to allow the stones to provide better contact with the earth below and alongside.
I prefer to provide a handle on each mesh bag. The mesh bag may be open at one end and have a draw string around the opening. The draw string will serve as the handle when the bag has been closed. Alternatively, a handle may be sewn or otherwise attached to the mesh bag.
Other details and advantages of my method will become apparent from a detailed description of the method as shown in the drawings.
Referring to
In the mesh bag 1 shown in
Although my method could be used to control erosion in gullies, the primary goal of the method is to prevent the formation of gullies by placing the rock-filled mesh bags in rills when they are first discovered. These rills may be as small as 2 inches deep and 3 inches wide. For that reason, as well as to permit the bags to be easily carried, I prefer to provide small mesh bags that are 2 inches wide, 4 inches tall and about 1 inch thick and pillow-shaped when laid on a flat surface. One such small mesh bag may be sufficient where the rill is 2 inches deep and 3 inches wide. I also provide larger bags that may be up to 8 inches wide, 12 inches tall and 4 inches thick when laid on a flat surface. The mesh bags can be made of any suitable material including natural materials like hemp or cotton rope or a plastic, such as nylon, polypropylene or polyethylene or reinforced plastic or metal. If the bags will be used in an area where a tractor or other equipment could run over them then a stronger material like nylon or chain metal mesh should be used.
The mesh bags for ordinary use are filled with rocks 8 of different size, all having a size in which a largest diameter of the rock is between ⅜ inch and 1.5 inches for most uses. In areas of heavy flow, proportionately larger bags, and stones, may be better utilized. The mesh bags preferably weigh between 3 pounds and 6 pounds. Smaller and larger sizes may be provided for special uses, as at the base of downspouts or larger rills. Sometimes, the ideal “flow-slower” is flat, only an inch or two thick. As shown in
In the mesh bag shown in
Preferably when a rill is found the user of my method places one or more mesh bags 1, 10 near the head of the rill 20 as shown in
Because my mesh bags are easy to lift and carry the user does not need any tools to place the mesh bags at desired locations. Mesh bags that are 6 inches tall and 4 inches wide and 1 inch or two inches thick will fit in some jacket pockets and several of them can be carried in a shopping bag or basket. The average farmer or average landowner should be able to carry four or more bags several hundred yards. Consequently, a user is more likely to place my rocked filled mesh bags in a rill or gully when he or she first discovers it and the rill or gully is small. Of course the user could load multiple bags into a wheel barrow or onto a cart attached to a small tractor or riding lawnmower for transport.
The key to effective and lower cost erosion control of hillsides is to place the mesh bags in rills while they are small, before they become gullies. If my mesh bags had been placed in the rills at the top of
Once in place the mesh bags will allow water to pass through the bag while slowing the flow of the moving water. Consequently, the mesh bags will not act as a dam and cause the moving water to be diverted away from the mesh bags and form a new rill or gully. The mesh material, small size and pillow shape of the mesh bags enables the rock-filled bags to generally conform to the shape of the gully, making it less likely that the bags will roll away from their original location.
I prefer to use smaller rocks and larger rocks in each bag. The smaller stones settle toward the bottom of the bag enabling the bag to conform more closely to the irregular surfaces of the bottom of the rill. That protects it from further erosion caused by water going underneath the bag. When the mesh bag is put into a tiny rill, one only a few inches wide, the mesh bag may have to be extended to lower the height and keep the top of the bag safe from mower blades. This can be done if the mesh bag is partially filled or if the bag is constructed to be expandable. A mesh bag that is ¾ full would allow the installer to manipulate the mesh bag so that it fit snugly in a wider variety of rills. One type of expandable bag may have one or more pleats in the sidewalls. Both the extendable pleated mesh bags and the mostly full mesh bags would allow the user to fit the bag better into the rill and better keep erosion from deepening or widening the rill.
The amount of soil that can be carried by moving water is directly related to the flow rate of the water. When the mesh bags slow the water speed some suspended soil articles will drop to the bottom of the rill or gulley. Over time this deposited soil will build up behind the mesh bags filling in the rill or gully. Because the deposited soil is often rich in nutrients vegetation can easily sprout and grow in the deposit. This new vegetation discourages soil erosion. The stems and leaves help to slow down raindrops as they fall while the roots of the plants help to hold the soil together.
During the late spring I placed mesh bags in a rill that had formed on a slope in typical soil. This rill was less than a foot wide and 8-10 inches deep near its head. At this location I placed one rectangular bag about 12 inches wide, about 2 inches high and about 2 inches thick. Then I placed an additional, larger bag about 15 feet downstream of this location. There the rill was wider and deeper, having formed a small gulley. After a month, I checked the area and saw that soil had already begun to fill in the gulley upstream of each bag and plants had sprouted in the soil deposits. No new gullies or rills had formed.
It became apparent that the smaller stones settling to the bottom of the bag helped stop future erosion. At the same time, the larger stones in the upper part of the bag were very effective in slowing the water. That protected the downstream portion of the rill from the great erosion that had previously made it much deeper after a few heavy rains.
While my method could be used for large gullies that are several feet wide and over a foot deep, it is not likely that the average landowner or farmer would use the method for that purpose because of the number of bags that would be required for each location and the total number of bags required for the full length of the gully. On the other hand the average landowner or farmer is more likely to use my method than to choose another method to control erosion, or to do nothing, because my mesh bags are easy to carry and place in a rill or small gully.
Although I have shown and described certain present preferred embodiments of my method for reducing erosion it should be distinctly understood that my invention is not limited thereto but may be variously embodied within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3374635 | Crandall | Mar 1968 | A |
5211191 | Brown | May 1993 | A |
5595458 | Grabhorn | Jan 1997 | A |
5941661 | Ishikura | Aug 1999 | A |
6305876 | Yoshino et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6493990 | Anderson | Dec 2002 | B1 |
8287728 | Kania et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8657529 | Ohkubo et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
9986698 | Anderson | Jun 2018 | B2 |
20020008071 | Chinn | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020090265 | Merten | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040101368 | Daigle | May 2004 | A1 |
20050254899 | Tyler | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070253785 | Tyler | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080247685 | Kim | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100108617 | Schmidt et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20120011773 | Cross | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120117739 | Cook | May 2012 | A1 |
20120257926 | De Giuseppe | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120257933 | De Giuseppe | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20160030867 | Love | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20170233969 | Hawkinson | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20190176059 | Zock | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190234042 | Burkett | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190308801 | Marias Albrich | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200080272 | Hawkinson | Mar 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3925353 | Feb 1991 | DE |
2005054400 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005350929 | Dec 2005 | JP |
20030090246 | Nov 2003 | KR |
Entry |
---|
California Storm Water Quality Association, “California Stormwater BMP Handbook”, Jan. 2003. Page 6. Link: https://www.escondido.org/Data/Sites/1/media/pdfs/Utilities/BMPStreambankStabilization.pdf (Year: 2003). |
Nile Basin Initiative, Eastern Nile Subsidiary Action Program (ENSAP), Eastern Nile Technical Regional Office (ENTRO), Eastern Nile Watershed Management Project, “A Field Guide on Gully Prevention and Control”, Prepared by Lakew Desta & Belayneh Adugna dated Mar. 2012. |
Section SE-6 Gravel Bag Berm from California Stormwater BMP Handbook Nov. 2009. |