Method for reducing latency in a host ethernet adapter (HEA)

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7508771
  • Patent Number
    7,508,771
  • Date Filed
    Friday, April 1, 2005
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 24, 2009
    16 years ago
Abstract
A method for reducing latency in a host Ethernet adapter (HEA) includes the following. First, the HEA receives a packet with an internet protocol (IP) header and data in the HEA. The HEA parses a connection identifier from the IP header and accesses a negative cache in the HEA to determine if the connection identifier is not in a memory external to the HEA. The HEA applies a default treatment to the packet if the connection identifier is not in the memory, thereby reducing latency by decreasing access to the memory.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to adapters for parsing Internet packets generally, and specifically to a system and method for reducing latency in a host Ethernet adapter (HEA).


CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is related to the following copending U.S. patent application Ser. Nos.:


U.S. patent application, Ser. No. 11/097,608, entitled “Host Ethernet Adapter for Networking Offload in Server Environment”, filed on even date herewith and assigned to the assignee of the present invention.


U.S. patent application, Ser. No. 11/096,363, entitled “Method and System for Accommodating Several Ethernet Ports and a Wrap Transmitted Flow Handled by a Simplified Frame-By-Frame Upper Structure”, filed on even date herewith and assigned to the assignee of the present invention.


U.S. patent application, Ser. No. 11/096,571, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Providing a Network Connection Table”, filed on even date herewith and assigned to the assignee of the present invention.


U.S. patent application, Ser. No. 11/097,051, entitled “Network Communications for Operating System Partitions”, filed on even date herewith and assigned to the assignee of the present invention.


U.S. patent application, Ser. No. 11/097,652, entitled “Configurable Ports for a Host Ethernet Adapter”, filed on even date herewith and assigned to the assignee of the present invention.


U.S. patent application, Ser. No. 11/096,353, entitled “System and Method for a Method for Reducing Latency in a Host Ethernet Adapter (HEA)”, filed on even date herewith and assigned to the assignee of the present invention.


U.S. patent application, Ser. No. 11/097,055, (entitled “Method and Apparatus for Blind Checksum and Correction for Network Transmissions”, filed on even date herewith and assigned to the assignee of the present invention.


U.S. patent application, Ser. No. 11/096,362, entitled “Method and System for Performing a Packet Header Lookup”, filed on even date herewith and assigned to the assignee of the present invention.


U.S. patent application, Ser. No. 11/097,430, entitled “System and Method for Computing a Blind Checksum in a Host Ethernet Adapter (HEA)”, filed on even date herewith and assigned to the assignee of the present invention.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A computer, or host, connects to a network through an adapter that parses, or separates, each packet received over the network. The adapter may be known as a host Ethernet adapter (HEA). A packet is composed of an Internet protocol (IP) header and some data. The IP header is composed of several fields, such as source address, destination address, ports, protocol, and some transport protocol information. These fields are known as the 5-tuple, or connection identifier (Id), and are used to identify how the packet should be handled.


After parsing out the connection Id, the HEA sends the connection Id to a memory external to the adapter. The external memory may have a lookup table or connection table for looking up the treatment protocol for the packet. One problem with this is that the process of sending the connection Id to the memory and having the memory look up the treatment protocol for each packet is time-consuming, resulting in an undesirable latency for the look up of the treatment protocol for packets in the adapter. Storing the connection table in the adapter is not practical due to the size of the connection table.


Accordingly, what is needed is a system and method for reducing latency in a host Ethernet adapter (HEA). The present invention addresses such a need.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a system and method for reducing latency in a host Ethernet adapter (HEA) including the following. First, the HEA receives a packet with an Internet protocol (IP) header and data in the HEA. The HEA parses a connection identifier from the IP header and accesses a negative cache in the HEA to determine if the connection identifier is not in a memory external to the HEA. The HEA applies a default treatment to the packet if the connection identifier is not in the memory, thereby reducing latency by decreasing access to the memory.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a host Ethernet adapter (HEA) according to one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of the invention implemented in the diagram of FIG. 1.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a system and method for reducing latency in a host Ethernet adapter (HEA). The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiments and the generic principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a host Ethernet adapter (HEA) 100 connected to a host 102 and a memory 104. The HEA contains a negative cache 106 connected to a system 108 and optionally may include a regular cache 110. The memory 104 includes a connection table 112.



FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of the invention implemented in the diagram of FIG. 1. FIGS. 1 and 2 will be discussed in conjunction with one another. For simplicity, reference numerals beginning with ‘100’ will be found in FIG. 1 while reference numerals beginning with ‘200’ will be found in FIG. 2.


In block 200 of FIG. 2, HEA 100 receives a packet 114 with an Internet protocol (IP) header 116 and data 118. The IP header 116 includes a destination IP address 120, a source IP address 122, a protocol 124, a source port 126, and a destination port 128, which are collectively known as a connection identifier (Id) 130. The HEA 100 may receive many packets 114.


In block 205, the system 108 parses the connection Id 130 from the IP header 114. If HEA 100 can determine that the connection Id 130 is stored in either regular cache 110 or connection table 112, then HEA 100 will receive a specific treatment, or set of instructions, for directing packet 114. Many packets 114 fall under a default treatment setting, which means they are all treated alike. Some packets 114 require special handling, and have specific treatments that differ from the default treatment. Some packets 114 may require special handling, but the specific treatment has not been entered into regular cache 110 or connection table 112, so a default treatment is used.


In block 210, the system 108 may determine if the connection Id 130 is in the optional regular cache 110. If the regular cache 110 is not present in HEA 100, this block is skipped. If the connection Id 130 is in the regular cache 110, then the method of treating packet 114 may be looked up and applied in block 215. Sometimes the specific treatment listed in the regular cache 110 is the same as the default treatment had the connection Id 130 not been listed.


Continuing from block 210, if the connection Id 130 is not in the regular cache 110, then in block 220, system 108 accesses the negative cache 106. The negative cache 106 includes a one-bit wide bit vector 132 lacking collision resolution, with any number of entries. The HEA 100 has better performance with a smaller bit vector 132.


In block 225, negative cache 106 hashes the connection Id 130 with a one-bit wide hash table (not shown) for a bit position. After hashing connection Id 130, a bit position will result, for example bit position four. Then, in block 230, negative cache 106 accesses the bit vector 132 and in block 235 determines if the connection Id 130 is not in the memory 104 based on the value of the bit vector 132 at the bit position (for example, bit position four).


At this time, an explanation of setting the bit vector 132 will aid in understanding the invention. The bit vector 132 is initially set to a predetermined value, for example all zero to indicate that no entries are in the memory 104. When a specific treatment for a connection Id 130 is entered into memory 104, the hash table of negative cache 106 (not shown) is used to hash the connection Id 130 being stored, resulting in a bit position. That bit position represents the connection Id 130, and flipping the value from the default setting indicates the possible presence of a specific treatment for the connection Id 130 in the memory 104. Negative cache 106 can only negatively determine the presence of a connection Id 130 in the memory 104 because the hash table (not shown) and bit vector 132 lack collision resolution, meaning some connection Ids 130 will have the same hash bit position.


For example when storing in memory 104 the specific treatment for a connection Id 130, assume a bit vector 132 with all zeros. A hash of the connection Id 130 results in a bit position, for example bit position four, which currently has a value of zero (all the positions are currently zero). Bit position four is then switched in bit vector 132, for example from zero to one. However, other connection Ids 130, which do not receive the same treatment as the first, may also hash to position four. By changing bit position four from zero to one, the negative cache 106 establishes that at least one of possibly several connection Ids 130 with a hash value to bit position four are in the memory 104. Only by checking the memory 104 will HEA 100 be able to determine if a particular connection Id 130 is in the memory 104. However, if the value is zero, none of the connection Ids with a hash value to that bit position are in the memory 104, and the memory 104 does not need to be checked. This is why cache 106 is a ‘negative’ cache.


Continuing after block 235, in block 240 HEA 100 determines if the connection Id 130 is not in the memory 104. As explained above, only the absence of the connection Id 130 from the memory 130 can be answered with authority, due to the lack of collision resolution in the bit vector 132.


If the connection Id 130 is not in the memory 104, then in block 245 the HEA 100 applies a default treatment to the packet 114. The amount of time required to check the bit vector 132 is less than the amount of time required to check the connection table 112 in the memory 104, so avoiding access to the memory 104 decreases latency in the HEA 100.


In the earlier example, connection Id 130 hashed to bit position four. In bit vector 132, bit position four 134 is one, so the absence of the connection Id 130 from memory 104 cannot be established without actually checking the memory 104. Therefore, in block 250, HEA 100 accesses the memory 104. The memory 104 may access connection table 112 to determine if the connection Id 130 is present. If the connection Id 130 is present, the treatment is sent to HEA 100 and in block 260 the HEA 100 applies a specific treatment to the packet 114.


If the connection Id 130 is not present in the connection table 112, then in block 265 the HEA 100 applies the default treatment to the packet 114. By properly identify which packets 114 should be given a default treatment and which have a specific treatment, the efficiency of HEA 100 increases.


After parsing, filtering and performing other tasks on the packet 114, HEA 100 sends the data 118 on to host 102.


According to the method and system disclosed herein, the present invention discloses a system and method for reducing latency in a HEA. One skilled in the art will recognize that the particular standards used are exemplary, and any bandwidth-limited network may apply the invention in the above manner. The present invention has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, and one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that there could be variations to the embodiments, and any variations would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, many modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for reducing latency in a host Ethernet adapter (HEA) comprising: receiving a packet with an internet protocol (IP) header and data;parsing a connection identifier from the IP header;accessing a negative cache in the HEA to determine if the connection identifier is not in a memory external to the HEA, the accessing a negative cache in the HEA further comprising: hashing the connection identifier for a bit position;accessing a bit vector in the HEA; anddetermining if the connection identifier is not in the memory based on a value of the bit vector at the bit position; andapplying a default treatment to the packet if the connection identifier is not in the memory, thereby reducing latency by decreasing access to the memory.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising: determining if the connection identifier is in a regular cache in the HEA; andapplying a specific treatment to the packet if the connection identifier is in the regular cache.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining if the connection identifier is in the memory;applying a specific treatment to the packet if the connection identifier is in the memory; andapplying the default treatment to the packet if the connection identifier is not in the memory.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, a value of zero in bit vector at the bit position indicating that the connection identifier is not in the memory.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the negative cache is a one-bite wide hash table lacking collision resolution.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the connection identifier includes a protocol, a source Internet protocol (IP) address, a desitination IP address, a source port, and a destination port.
US Referenced Citations (55)
Number Name Date Kind
5058110 Beach et al. Oct 1991 A
5430842 Thompson et al. Jul 1995 A
5752078 Delp et al. May 1998 A
6400730 Latif et al. Jun 2002 B1
6427169 Elzur Jul 2002 B1
6650640 Muller et al. Nov 2003 B1
6658002 Ross et al. Dec 2003 B1
6678746 Russell et al. Jan 2004 B1
6724769 Sang Apr 2004 B1
6728929 Luong Apr 2004 B1
6735670 Bronstein et al. May 2004 B1
6751229 Waller et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754662 Li Jun 2004 B1
6788697 Aweya et al. Sep 2004 B1
6822968 Lim Nov 2004 B1
6954463 Ma et al. Oct 2005 B1
6976205 Ziai et al. Dec 2005 B1
6988235 Brown Jan 2006 B2
7023811 Pinto Apr 2006 B2
7031304 Arberg et al. Apr 2006 B1
7098685 Agrawal et al. Aug 2006 B1
7124198 Pinkerton Oct 2006 B2
7134796 Anderson Nov 2006 B2
7164678 Connor Jan 2007 B2
7218632 Bechtolsheim et al. May 2007 B1
7251704 Solomon Jul 2007 B2
7260120 Kang et al. Aug 2007 B2
7269661 Ree et al. Sep 2007 B2
7271706 Nguyen et al. Sep 2007 B2
7274706 Nguyen et al. Sep 2007 B1
7283528 Lim et al. Oct 2007 B1
7292586 Dewan et al. Nov 2007 B2
7292591 Parker et al. Nov 2007 B2
7295553 Saitoh Nov 2007 B2
7308006 Banerjee et al. Dec 2007 B1
20010027496 Boucher et al. Oct 2001 A1
20030088689 Alexander et al. May 2003 A1
20030103499 Davis et al. Jun 2003 A1
20040022094 Radhakrishnan et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040030766 Witkowski Feb 2004 A1
20040064590 Starr et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040081145 Harrekilde-Peterson et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040100952 Boucher et al. May 2004 A1
20040109465 Kim et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040218623 Goldenberg et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050076136 Cho et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050089031 Krueger Apr 2005 A1
20050108611 Vogt May 2005 A1
20050114663 Cornell et al. May 2005 A1
20050120160 Plouffe et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149677 Shimada et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050256975 Kaniz et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060120289 Cunningham Jun 2006 A1
20060187928 McGee et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060216958 Yee et al. Sep 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
03049488 Jun 2003 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060221951 A1 Oct 2006 US