In the roofing industry and particularly the commercial roofing industry, exposed roofing membranes have become prevalent. Single ply roofing systems, and others using an exposed membrane, although very effective are subject to greater damage from hail impact than some other types of roof systems. One significant exacerbator of the potential for damage from hail is the very fasteners that retain the membrane and roof assembly component materials underlying the membrane. Such fasteners are nails, special clips, anchors or screws and typically have washers positioned thereunder to spread the hold down load of the head of the fastener. Because fasteners are generally immovable, connected to structural subjacent roof support materials or otherwise substantially immoveable, they pose particular risks to the overlying waterproofing membrane when hail strikes. The fastener/washer act essentially as an anvil against which the roofing membrane can be suddenly and violently compressed by the substantial momentum transfer from a hail stone. This compression tends to rapidly and for short duration “flow” the membrane material in all directions from the impact site. Rupture of the overlying waterproofing membrane can easily occur when hail hits the membrane in an area of an underlying fastener. In order to improve the hail resistance of such roof structures, this characteristic must be alleviated. The roofing industry tests for hail presently utilize a ½″ to 2″ steel ball. The ball is accelerated to terminal (free full) velocity and directed at a roof assembly to measure hail impact. Recently, hail testing has been developed further to enable the shooting of actual ice balls from an air cannon through a timing device at a roof assembly which has been cooled to 38° F. with chilled water. This test more realistically shows the effects of various size hail ice balls from ½″ to 5″ diameter at various mph speeds into a roof assembly sample. A 3″ hail ball approximately the size of a baseball will fall in still air at 95 to 97 mph. If the 3″ hail is caught in a down draft of wind it can increase its speed. Some 3″ hail impact dents on sheet metal equipment on roofs hit by hail required a 3″ hail ball to be shot at 150 mph to replicate the dent. At 100 mph, a 3″ hail ball will go through ½ inch APA approved oriented strand board (osb) wafer board and at 135 mph and a 3″ hail ball will go through ½″ plywood.
Disclosed herein is a method for reducing roof membrane damage from hail/fastener impact by locating a fastener, positioning an energy absorbing material over said fastener and affixing said material to said fastener.
Further disclosed herein is a roof system with reduced hail/fastener impact damage characteristics. The system comprises a roof substrate having one or more layers of material at least one fastener exposed at a top surface of said substrate and a dedicated energy absorbing material positioned over said at least one fastener. A roof water proofing membrane is placed atop the foregoing elements.
Referring now to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several Figures:
Referring to
The energy absorbing material may comprise ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM), butyl rubber, EPDM with a butyl gum rubber bottom or other flowable material as a combination including at least one of the foregoing, and in one embodiment is affixed to fastener head 20 and washer 22 by adhering. The adhering may be by applying an adhesive material to the fastener head/washer or to the energy absorbing material during installation of the energy absorbing material, or may be simply by sticking down (self-stick) the energy absorbing material having had an adhesive pre-applied thereto.
It is to be understood that the roof structure illustrated in
In an alternate embodiment hereof, the energy absorbing layer(s) may be placed on top of the waterproofing membrane directly over a fastener instead of being applied directly to the fastener with similar beneficial results. This is illustrated in
While preferred embodiments have been shown and described, modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustrations and not limitation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4382353 | Kelly | May 1983 | A |
4437283 | Benoit | Mar 1984 | A |
4493175 | Coppola, Jr. | Jan 1985 | A |
4546589 | Seaman | Oct 1985 | A |
4588637 | Chiu | May 1986 | A |
4631887 | Francovitch | Dec 1986 | A |
4649686 | Backenstow et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4747241 | Whitman | May 1988 | A |
4841706 | Resan | Jun 1989 | A |
4885887 | Simmons et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4977720 | Kuipers | Dec 1990 | A |
5204148 | Alexander et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5419666 | Best | May 1995 | A |
5711116 | Hasan | Jan 1998 | A |
6233889 | Hulsey | May 2001 | B1 |
6502360 | Carr et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6516572 | Nowacek et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
7146771 | Swann | Dec 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050102939 A1 | May 2005 | US |