Patent Grant
8931411
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to patent application no. DE 10 2011 122 514.9, filed on Dec. 29, 2011 in Germany, and to patent application no. DE 10 2012 002 724.9, filed on Feb. 10, 2012 in Germany, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The present disclosure relates to a method for regulating a web tension in a processing machine.
Although the disclosure will be described in the following text substantially with reference to printing presses, it is not restricted to an application of this type, but rather can be used in all types of processing machines, in which a tension of a product web or material web is to be predefined. The product web can be configured from paper, material, cardboard, plastic, metal, rubber, in film form, etc.
In processing machines, in particular printing presses, a product web is moved along driven axles (web transport axles), such as pull rolls or feed rolls, and non-driven axles, such as deflecting, guiding, drying or cooling rolls. At the same time, the product web is processed by means of usually likewise driven processing axles, for example is printed, punched, cut, folded, etc.
The tension or web stress (as long as no cross-sectional change occurs, the tension and stress are proportional; however, the tension is usually measured) of the product web is influenced, for example, via what are known as clamping points which clamp the product web positively or non-positively. Here, these are regularly driven transporting or processing units. In a gravure printing press, a clamping point is usually formed by a printing unit, in which a frictional unit exists between the driven impression cylinder, the impression roller and the material web. The product web is divided into product-web sections, a product-web section being delimited by two clamping points. Further driven and/or non-driven axles can be arranged within a product-web section. The entire product web is often divided into a plurality of product-web sections, sometimes also with different setpoint tension values. In order to maintain the setpoint values, what is known as web stress regulation (web tension regulation) is usually used. The regulation of the web tension usually takes place via a strain as manipulated variable, by the rotational speed of the clamping points being influenced.
The regulation of the web tension of a product-web section can take place in different ways. Downstream means that the clamping point which delimits the product-web section downstream is adjusted, and upstream means that the clamping point which delimits the product-web section upstream is adjusted. In this simple embodiment, however, the web tension in preceding and/or following product-web sections is not decoupled by the actuating movement. Rather, the change in the web tension is transported through the machine so as to follow the product-web course and is to be adjusted in all following sections. In addition to this indirect disruption on account of the transport of the material web, a direct disruption on account of the actuating movement is to be found in the product-web section which adjoins the adjusted clamping point.
It is possible, in the case of downstream regulation, to pilot control all the following clamping points by means of (dynamic) downstream pilot control, in such a way that said following clamping points compensate directly for the effects of the preceding clamping point, that is to say the web tension does not change there. As a consequence, it is ensured that all the following web-tension regulators do not have to compensate for the disruptions of the actuating movement and of the coupling by the material web. This is described, for example, in the publication “Simulation and Optimierung des Bahnspannungsverhaltens” [Simulation and optimization of the web-stress behavior], 9th web running seminar of the Technical University of Chemnitz, Chemnitz, 2007, Schnabel, H., Dörsam, E., Schultze, S. The web tension in the following product-web sections is decoupled here from the regulation of the web stress in the preceding product-web section.
DE 10 2008 056 132 A1 proposes decoupling for upstream regulation, (dynamic) downstream pilot control by means of PT1 element being carried out in addition to (constant) upstream pilot control.
DE 10 2009 016 206 A1 discloses a method with decoupling which is implemented exclusively in the upstream direction. Here, a combination is disclosed comprising pilot control which is weighted in the upstream direction by a DT1 element and pilot control, which is weighted by a negative PT1 element, exclusively of the rear delimiting clamping point. The specifications “upstream of” and “downstream of” a clamping point or a product-web section relate to the transport direction of the product web, that is to say the product-web course.
However, machine configurations are then also possible, in which a web stress change from one product-web section is reflected only after a time delay in another product-web section, the region between the two sections being unregulated and being called a delay section in the following text. The time delay is also called dead time.
A delay section is formed, for example, if the product web wraps around one or more rolls, such as cooling or drying rolls, the web tension approximately not changing during the roll contact as a result of the snug fit of the web against the roll. No concrete solution is specified in the prior art for cases of this type.
According to the disclosure, a method for regulating a web tension is proposed having the features of the disclosure. Advantageous refinements are the subject matter of the subclaims and of the following description.
The disclosure provides the possibility of decoupling the tension in a second product-web section from tension regulation in a first product-web section, even if the first and the second product-web section are separated by a delay section. The web tension is not changed within the delay section, that is to say a product-web cross section leaves the delay section with essentially the same web tension, with which it ran into the delay section. It is to be emphasized that there can nevertheless be different web tension values along the delay section, by the web tension varying at the inlet point. A delay section is formed, for example, if the product web wraps around one or more rolls, such as cooling or drying rolls or back-pressure cylinders. Rolls which are wrapped around are usually also relatively large, with the result that, even above a wrap-around amount of approximately 5%, the effects on the web stress behavior are so great that the disclosure leads to appreciable advantages. The greater the wrap-around degree, the clearer the difference of decoupling according to the disclosure from decoupling from the prior art. Above a wrap-around amount of 25%, no more decoupling can usually be brought about by way of conventional means. The disclosure is then particularly advantageous here.
The disclosure indicates a solution to take transport delays (dead times) into consideration in the case of regulation or in the case of decoupling (pilot control). Here, in the context of the disclosure, time delay elements which are proportional to the delay times are used in the pilot control of actuators. In the context of the disclosure, the actuating command for an actuator of a first product-web section is defined in the context of tension regulation from a regulation output value, for example by a PI regulator. This regulation output value is pilot-controlled for decoupling at actuators of other product-web sections via corresponding regulating elements, such as P elements or PT1 elements, as is known from the prior art which is cited at the outset. In order then to additionally ensure effective decoupling even beyond a delay section, portions of actuating commands for selected actuators of product-web sections which are separated by a delay section are temporally delayed correspondingly, the time delay being proportional to the delay time of the delay section.
The delay time can be defined as a quotient of the web length (that is to say, the length of the product web) of the delay section (for example, this is the length of a wrap-around amount of a roll or of a CI impression cylinder (common impression) and the web speed. This advantageously makes an adaptation of the time delay element to changed web speeds online during operation possible. A delay section can, in particular, also be formed by a plurality of rolls one behind another, for example for drying paper in papermaking machines. Said rolls are often driven identically and together form a delay section.
According to one advantageous development, the behavior of the web tensions in the product-web sections which are adjacent to the delay section is taken into consideration during the determination of the web length of a delay section which is formed by one or more rolls which are wrapped around. If namely, in the case of a roll which is wrapped around, the web tensions are different on both sides of the roll, part of the wrap-around is affected by slip (Euler-Eytelwein rope friction equation). On account of frictional effects over a web-transporting roll which is wrapped around, it can occur that it is not the entire wrap-around angle that is assumed as dead time or transport time of the web extension, but rather only a smaller amount of the wrap-around angle, since, in the case of different web tensions upstream and downstream of the wrap-around amount, part of the wrap-around amount is transported in a manner which is affected by slip and therefore is not taken into account as dead time in the transport of the extended web, but rather can be considered to be a virtual extension of the corresponding associated web section. The greater the force difference, the greater the region of slip. The length of the non-slipping region defines the length of the delay section and can be calculated according to the abovementioned Euler-Eytelwein rope friction equation. The region with slip is to be added in a first approximation to the adjoining product-web section. If, for example, a somewhat lower web tension is assumed upstream of the wrap-around amount than downstream of the wrap-around amount, part of the wrap-around amount at the wrap-around beginning (as viewed in the web running direction) will not transport the product web without slip and will therefore also not represent a dead time in the sense of the transport of the extension. This partial wrap-around amount can then be added approximately to the web length of the preceding web section (addition).
The disclosure is based on the measure of performing the actuation of a second product-web section, which is separated from a first product-web section by a delay section, by way of a second actuating command (in particular, in the context of pilot control) which results from a regulation output value for the regulation of the tension in the first product-web section and additionally with the use of a time delay element, in particular a dead time element, an approximation of a dead time element, or of a PT1, . . . , PTn element. The actuation of a product-web section is to be understood to be the actuation of an actuator for controlling/regulating the web stress in the relevant product-web section. The actuating command preferably influences the rotational speed of a clamping point, which delimits the product-web section, as actuator, but other actuators, such as pressure-loaded rolls, are also known, however. The infeed unit and the unwinding device can likewise be incorporated into the pilot control in the upstream direction, and the outfeed unit and the winding device can likewise be incorporated into the pilot control in the downstream direction.
Starting from an existing regulation structure, a regulation structure according to the disclosure can be obtained by insertion of a time delay element into the generation of the actuating command for the actuator which influences the web tension in the second product-web section. The disclosure can be implemented particularly simply in practice. In particular, it can be added to regulation structures, as are known in the prior art and have been described in the introduction. Here, in the context of this disclosure, reference is made expressly to the regulation structures according to DE 10 2008 056 132 A1 and DE 10 2009 016 206 A1. The combination of the present disclosure with these regulation structures is stated expressly as a particularly preferred embodiment of the disclosure. As a result, in addition to the decoupling of the second product-web section, decoupling of further sections can take place. A combination with a regulation structure according to the subsequently published DE 10 2011 014 074 is also particularly preferred. In this way, a location with an unchanged product-web speed can be predefined, which is advantageous, in particular, for digital printing units.
It is likewise advantageous to take the time delay into consideration in the design of the regulation by stipulation of the regulator parameters (such as proportional gain KP, integral-action time TN, etc.). Typically, for example, the P gain which can be achieved drops as the time delay rises. As an alternative, compensation (for example, by means of a Smith predictor) for the expected time delay can be carried out in the regulator.
A computing unit according to the disclosure, for example a control unit of a web processing machine, is set up, in particular in terms of programming technology, to carry out a method according to the disclosure.
The implementation of the disclosure in the form of software is also advantageous, since this makes particularly low costs possible, in particular if an executing computing unit is also used for further tasks and is therefore present in any case. Suitable data storage media for providing the computer program are, in particular, diskettes, hard drives, flash memories, EEPROMs, CD-ROMs, DVDs and others. A download of a program via computer networks (Internet, Intranet, etc.) is also possible.
Further advantages and refinements of the disclosure result from the description and the appended drawing.
It goes without saying that the features which are stated above and are still to be explained in the following text can be used not only in the respectively specified combination, but also in other combinations or on their own, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
The disclosure is shown diagrammatically using exemplary embodiments in the drawings, and will be described in detail in the following text with reference to the drawings.
The physical parameters, namely the length l, the elongation ε and the web stress or tension F of the individual product-web sections, are likewise specified in the figure with corresponding indices. Here, the length of a web section is to be considered to be the length of the product web which is clamped in the web section under consideration.
In order to regulate the web tension, a regulating deviation e is fed to a regulating element 140, for example a PI regulator, which calculates a regulation output value Δv (for example, a change in rotational speed) therefrom. Said regulation output value can act via individual elements 131 to 135 with associated transfer functions G1 to G5 on the circumferential speeds v1 to v5. The elements 131 to 135 can be zero elements (that is to say, G=0), but also P elements, I elements, D elements, PT1 elements, PT2 elements, PTn elements, DT elements, DT2 elements, DTn elements, etc. or any desired combinations thereof with the known associated transfer functions. The elements 131 to 135 and 140 are expediently implemented in a computing unit.
In the following text, fundamental examples are to be described for regulating the web tension in the section 34.
For the section 34, an increase in the speed v3 of the front clamping point 3 brings about a reduction in the web tension and, conversely, an increase in the speed v4 of the rear clamping point 4 brings about an increase in the web tension. The following regulating and decoupling strategies are known, the manipulated variable resulting as Gi*Δv:
In said regulating strategies, there is no provision to take a delay section into consideration. A delay section 6 can be produced, for example, if a clamping point is configured as a roll 4′ with wrap-around of the product web, for example as a drying roll, according to
The delay section 6 then leads to a time delay ΔT during the imparting of a web tension change which corresponds to the running time of the product web along the wrapped-around length of the roll/rolls 4′. The length can be given by l4, with the result that ΔT=l4/v4.
The decoupling formulae explained above are therefore changed within the scope of the disclosure in such a way that, despite the time delay ΔT, the web stress in the product-web sections (here, the section 45) which are separated by the delay section 6 remains decoupled from an adjustment of the web tension in the section 34. Without the time delay being taken into consideration, the use of formula (4) in the case of
Advantageously developed formulae result in:
The delay element can be approximated as a dead time element, as a PTn element (n=1, 2, 3, . . . ) or can be Padé approximated.
As has been described in DE 10 2011 014 074 which is a later publication, a regulating formula can be transferred into equivalent other regulating formulae by way of simple addition or subtraction of regulating elements. For example, (5) results from (4) by way of the addition of G=1, wherein 1−PT1 is approximated as DT1.
The following thus results, for example, from (6) by way of the addition of G=1:
The disclosure covers all decoupling strategies which can be derived from (6) by way of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division.
In the above example (6), the roll/rolls 4′ remains/remain nonadjusted, which is usually desired. If, however, it is desired, for example, that the clamping point 5 remains nonadjusted, this could be achieved by the addition of PT1*ΔT, the result of which would be the following equivalent regulating formula:
G1=−1+PT1*ΔT,G2=−1+PT1*ΔT,G3=−1+PT1*ΔT,G4=PT1*ΔT,G5=0 (6′)
In this case, first of all all the clamping points upstream of the delay section would be adjusted in the same direction (G=−1+PT1*ΔT), in order to decouple the regulator intervention. The regulator intervention is then transferred in a temporally delayed manner into the section 45. For the decoupling of the section 45, the clamping point 4′ is adjusted only after the delay time according to a PT1 method (G4=PT1*ΔT). In order to decouple the preceding product-web sections 34, 23 and 12 from said renewed actuating movement, the associated clamping points 1-3 are likewise adjusted after the delay time according to a PT1 method (G=−1+PT1*ΔT).
The decoupling strategies which are shown in the disclosure apply to the regulation of the tension, web stress and elongation. The actual force, actual web stress and/or actual elongation can therefore likewise be used as input variables for the regulation. Furthermore, regulation and/or pilot control by way of variables which are reconstructed by means of observers would be conceivable.
Furthermore, the control variables of the elements 131 to 135 which act on the speeds v1 to v5 can be combined with control variables of web tension regulation operations of further product-web sections. The above description described a regulation operation with measurement in the product-web section 34. If, in addition, there are also further web tension regulation operations, for example with measurement in the product-web sections 12, 23 and 45, the control variables thereof are added to the speeds v1 to v5.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2011 122 514 | Dec 2011 | DE | national |
| 10 2012 002 724 | Feb 2012 | DE | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110137451 | Schultze et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 10 2005 058 810 | Jun 2007 | DE |
| 10 2008 053 406 | Apr 2010 | DE |
| 10 2008 056 132 | May 2010 | DE |
| 10 2010 009 402 | Sep 2010 | DE |
| 10 2009 016 206 | Oct 2010 | DE |
| 10 2009 026 987 | Aug 2011 | DE |
| 10 2011 014 074 | Feb 2012 | DE |
| Entry |
|---|
| German Search Report corresponding to German Patent Application No. DE 10 2012 002 724.9, dated Jan. 21, 2013 (5 pages). |
| Brandenburg, Günther et al., “Schnittregister—und Bahnzugkraftregelung im Illustrationsdruck,” A&D Kompendium, 2005, pp. 274-278. |
| Brandenburg, Günter, “Über das dynamische Verhalten durchlaufender elastischer Stoffbahnen bei Kraftübertragung durch Coulomb'sche Reibung in einem Stoffsystem angetriebener, umschlungener Walzen,” Dissertation, 1971, Technische Universität München. |
| Brandenburg, Günter, “Über das dynamische Verhalten durchlaufender elastischer Stoffbahnen in einem System umschlungener Walzen,” Zeitungstechnik, Sep. 1992, pp. 12-26, ISSN 0019-333X. |
| Schnabel, Holger et al., “Simulation und Optimierung des Bahnspannungsverhaltens,” Bahnlaufseminar 9: Aktuelle Erkenntnisse aus Entwicklung und Forschung zum Thema Bahnlauf, Sep. 11-12, 2007, pp. 93-103. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130167744 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |
