Method for reissuing digital tokens in an open metering system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6285990
  • Patent Number
    6,285,990
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 19, 1995
    28 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 4, 2001
    22 years ago
Abstract
A method of reissuing digital tokens in a open system meter includes the steps of calculating a digital token using the predetermined postal information including addressee information, postage amount and piece count; debiting postal funds by the postage amount; issuing the digital token for generation of postage indicia; storing the digital token and the predetermined postal information as part of a transaction record in a transaction record file indexed according to addressee information; determining that the indicia generated from the digital token has not been successfully printed on a mailpiece for a particular addressee; and reissuing the digital token from the transaction record in the transaction file to generate the indicia for another attempt to print the indicia on the mailpiece.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to advanced postage payment systems and, more particularly, to advanced postage payment systems having pre-computed postage payment information.




RELATED APPLICATIONS




The present application is related to the following U.S. patent applications Ser. Nos. 08/575106 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,625,694), 08/575107 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,781,438), 08/574,746 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,835,604), 08/574,745 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,742,683), 08/574,743 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,793,867), 08/575,112 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,157,919), 08/575,109 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,151,590), 08/575,104 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,835,689), 08/574749 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,590,198) and 08/575,111 now abandoned each filed concurrently herewith, and assigned to the assignee of the present invention.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The USPS is presently considering requirements for two metering device types: closed systems and open systems. In a closed system, the system functionality is solely dedicated to metering activity. Examples of closed system metering devices, also referred to as postage evidencing devices (PEDs), include conventional digital and analog postage meters wherein a dedicated printer is securely coupled to a metering or accounting function. In a closed system, since the printer is securely coupled and dedicated to the meter, printing cannot take place without accounting. Furthermore, printing occurs immediately after accounting is concluded.




In an open system, the printer is not dedicated to the metering activity, freeing system functionality for multiple and diverse uses in addition to the metering activity. Examples of open system metering devices include personal computer (PC) based devices with single/multi-tasking operating systems, multi-user applications and digital printers. An open system metering device is a PED with a non-dedicated printer that is not securely coupled to a secure accounting module.




When a PED prints postage indicia on a mailpiece, the accounting register within the PED must always reflect that the printing has occurred. Postal authorities generally require the accounting information to be stored within the postage meter in a secure manner with security features that prevent unauthorized and unaccounted for postage printing or changes in the amounts of postal funds stored in the meter. In a closed system, the meter and printer are integral units, i.e., interlocked in such a manner as to ensure that the printing of postage indicia cannot occur without accounting.




Since an open system PED utilizes a printer that is not used exclusively for printing proof of postage payment, additional security measures are required to prevent unauthorized printing evidence of postage payment. Such security measures include cryptographic evidencing of postage payment by PEDs in the open and closed metering systems. The postage value for a mail piece may be encrypted together with other data to generate a digital token. A digital token is encrypted information that authenticates the information imprinted on a mail piece including postage values.




Examples of systems for generating and using digital tokens are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,757,537, 4,831,555, 4,775,246, 4,873,645, and 4,725,718, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. These systems employ an encryption algorithm to encrypt selected information to generate at least one digital token for each mailpiece. The encryption of the information provides security to prevent altering of the printed information in a manner such that any misuse of the tokens is detectable by appropriate verification procedures.




Typical information which may be encrypted as part of a digital token includes origination postal code, vendor identification, data identifying the PED, piece count, postage amount, date, and, for an open system, destination postal code. These items of information, collectively referred to as Postal Data, when encrypted with a secret key and printed on a mail piece provide a very high level of security which enables the detection of any attempted modification of a postal revenue block or a destination postal code. A postal revenue block is an image printed on a mail piece that includes the digital token used to provide evidence of postage payment. The Postal Data may be printed both in encrypted and unencrypted form in the postal revenue block. Postal Data serves as an input to a Digital Token Transformation which is a cryptographic transformation computation that utilizes a secret key to produce digital tokens. Results of the Digital Token Transformation, i.e., digital tokens, are available only after completion of the Accounting Process.




Digital tokens are utilized in both open and closed metering systems. However, for open metering systems, the non-dedicated printer may be used to print other information in addition to the postal revenue block and may be used in activity other than postage evidencing. In an open system PED, addressee information is included in the Postal Data which is used in the generation of the digital tokens. Such use of the addressee information creates a secure link between the mailpiece and the postal revenue block and allows unambiguous authentication of the mail piece.




A typical problem for postage meters in general is when the meter accounting function debits the available postage funds of the meter but the indicia has not been successfully printed. Usually, the only way to recover such postage funds is to take mailpieces with misprinted indicia to the Post for a refund. For open and closed metering systems, whenever a digital token is issued by the metering function, the metering function debits the available postage funds before postage indicia is printed. Therefore, even with new meters employing digital printing of indicia, the same problem exists.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




It has been discovered that in an open metering system a digital token can be reissued from the metering system if the digital token is never printed or if a problem occurs preventing a printing of postage indicia with the token. It has further been discovered that the security of the open system indicia is not compromised by such reissue of a token.




The present invention provides a method for reissuing a digital token for an open metering system, such as a PC-based metering system that comprises a PC, special Windows-based software, a printer and a plug-in peripheral as a vault to store postage funds. The PC meter uses a personal computer and its non-secure and non-dedicated printer to generate digital tokens and later print evidence of postage on envelopes and labels at the same time it prints a recipient address.




The present invention provides a token generation process for an open metering system that includes security that prevents tampering and false evidence of postage payment. The present invention further provides a token generation process that includes the ability to do batch processing of digital tokens.




In accordance with the present invention a method of reissuing digital tokens in a open system meter includes the steps of calculating a digital token using the predetermined postal information including addressee information, postage amount and piece count; debiting postal funds by the postage amount; issuing the digital token for generation of postage indicia; storing the digital token and the predetermined postal information as part of a transaction record in a transaction record file indexed according to piece count; determining that postage indicia generated from the digital token has not been successfully printed on a mailpiece for a particular addressee; and reissuing the digital token from the transaction record in the transaction file to generate the indicia for another attempt to print the indicia on the mailpiece.











DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The above and other objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:





FIG. 1

is a block diagram of a PC-based metering system in which the present invention operates;





FIG. 2

is a schematic block diagram of the PC-based metering system of

FIG. 1

including a removable vault card and a DLL in the PC;





FIG. 3

is a schematic block diagram of the DLL in the PC-based metering system of

FIG. 1

including interaction with the vault to issue and store digital tokens;





FIG. 4

is a block diagram of the DLL sub-modules in the PC-based metering system of

FIG. 1

;





FIGS. 5A

,


5


B and


5


C are a flow chart of a digital token generation process of the present invention;





FIG. 6

is a flow chart of the Transaction Capture sub-module in the PC-based metering system of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 7

is a flow chart of a token reissue process in the PC-based metering system of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 8

is a flow chart of the PC generating postage indicia image for a digital token in the PC-based metering system of

FIG. 1

; and





FIG. 9

is an representation of indicia generated and printed by the PC-based metering system of FIG.


1


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION




In describing the present invention, reference is made to the drawings, wherein there is seen in

FIGS. 1-4

an open system PC-based postage meter, also referred to herein as a PC meter system, generally referred to as


10


, in which the present invention performs the digital token process. PC meter system


10


includes a conventional personal computer configured to operate as a host to a removable metering device or electronic vault, generally referred to as


20


, in which postage funds are stored. PC meter system


10


uses the personal computer and its printer to print postage on envelopes at the same time it prints a recipient's address or to print labels for pre-addressed return envelopes or large mailpieces. It will be understood that although the preferred embodiment of the present invention is described with regard to a postage metering system, the present invention is applicable to any value metering system that includes a transaction evidencing.




As used herein, the term personal computer is used generically and refers to present and future microprocessing systems with at least one processor operatively coupled to user interface means, such as a display and keyboard, and storage media. The personal computer may be a workstation that is accessible by more than one user.




The PC-based postage meter


10


includes a personal computer (PC)


12


, a display


14


, a keyboard


16


, and an non-secured digital printer


18


, preferably a laser or ink-jet printer. PC


12


includes a conventional processor


22


, such as the 80486 and Pentium processors manufactured by Intel, and conventional hard drive


24


, floppy drive(s)


26


, and memory


28


. Electronic vault


20


, which is housed in a removable card, such as PCMCIA card, is a secure encryption device for postage funds management, digital token generation and traditional accounting functions. PC meter system


10


may also include an optional modem


29


which is located preferably in PC


12


. Modem


29


may be used for communicating with a Postal Service or a postal authenticating vendor for recharging funds (debit or credit). In an alternate embodiment the modem may be located in the PCMCIA card.




PC meter system


10


further includes a Windows-based PC software module


34


(

FIGS. 3 and 4

) that is accessible from conventional Windows-based word processing, database, accounting and spreadsheet application programs


36


. PC software module


34


includes a vault dynamic link library (DLL)


40


, a user interface module


42


, and a plurality of sub-modules that control the metering functions. DLL module


40


securely communicates with vault


20


and provides an open interface to Microsoft Windows-based application programs


36


through user interface module


42


. DLL module


40


also securely stores an indicia image and a copy of the usage of postal funds of the vault. User interface module


42


provides application programs


36


access to an electronic indicia image from DLL module


40


for printing the postal revenue block on a document, such as an envelope or label. User interface module


42


also provides application programs the capability to initiate remote refills and to perform administrative functions.




Thus, PC-based meter system


10


operates as a conventional personal computer with attached printer that becomes a postage meter upon user request. Printer


18


prints all documents normally printed by a personal computer, including printing letters and addressing envelopes, and in accordance with the present invention, prints postage indicia.




The vault is housed in a PCMCIA I/O device, or card,


30


which is accessed through a PCMCIA controller


32


in PC


12


. A PCMCIA card is a credit card size peripheral or adapter that conforms to the standard specification of the Personal Computer Memory Card International Association. Referring now to

FIGS. 2 and 3

, vault


20


includes a microprocessor


44


, redundant non-volatile memory (NVM)


46


, clock


48


, an encryption module


50


and an accounting module


52


. The encryption module


50


may implement the NBS Data Encryption Standard (DES) or another suitable encryption scheme. In the preferred embodiment, encryption module


50


is a software module. It will be understood that encryption module


50


could also be a separator device, such as a separate chip connected to microprocessor


44


. Accounting module


52


may be EEPROM that incorporates ascending and descending registers as well as postal data, such as origination ZIP Code, vendor identification, data identifying the PC-based postage meter


10


, sequential piece count of the postal revenue block generated by the PC-based postage meter


10


, postage amount and the date of submission to the Postal Service. As is known, an ascending register in a metering unit records the amount of postage that has been dispensed, i.e., issued by the vault, in all transactions and the descending register records the value, i.e., amount of postage, remaining in the metering unit, which value decreases as postage is issued.




The hardware design of the vault includes an interface


56


that communicates with the host processor


22


through PCMCIA controller


32


. Preferably, for added physical security, the components of vault


20


that perform the encryption and store the encryption keys (microprocessor


44


, ROM


47


and NVM


46


) are packaged in the same integrated circuit device/chip that is manufactured to be tamper proof. Such packaging ensures that the contents of NVM


46


may be read only by the encryption processor and are not accessible outside of the integrated circuit device. Alternatively, the entire card could be manufactured to be tamper proof.




The memory of each NVM


46


is organized into sections. Each section contains historical data of previous transactions by vault


20


. Examples of the types of transactions include: postage dispensed, tokens issued, refills, configuration parameters, and postal and vendor inspections. The size of each section depends on the number of transactions recorded and the data length of the type of transaction. Each section in turn is divided into transaction records. Within a section, the length of a transaction record is identical. The structure of a transaction record is such that the vault can check the integrity of data.




The functionality of DLL


40


is a key component of PC-based meter


10


. DLL


40


includes both executable code and data storage area


41


that is resident in hard drive


24


of PC


12


. In a Windows environment, a vast majority of applications programs


36


, such as word processing and spreadsheet programs, communicate with one another using one or more dynamic link libraries. PC-based meter


10


encapsulates all the processes involved in metering, and provides an open interface to vault


20


from all Windows-based applications capable of using a dynamic link library. Any application program


36


can communicate with vault microprocessor


44


through DLL


40


.




DLL


40


includes the following software sub-modules. Secure communications sub-module


80


controls communications between PC


12


and vault


20


. Transaction captures sub-module


82


stores transaction records in PC


12


. Secure indicia image creation and storage sub-module


84


generates an indicia bitmap image and stores the image for subsequent printing. Application interface sub-module


86


interfaces with non-metering application programs and issues requests for digital tokens in response to requests for indicia by the non-metering application programs. A more detailed description of PC meter system


10


is provided in related U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/575,112 filed concurrently herewith.




Since printer


18


is not dedicated to the metering function, issued digital tokens may be requested, calculated and stored in PC


12


for use at a later time when, at a user's discretion, corresponding indicia are generated and printed. Such delayed printing and batch processing is described in more detail in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/575,104.




Digital Token Generation Process




In accordance with the present invention, when a request for digital token is received from PC


12


, vault


20


calculates and issues at least one digital token to PC


12


in response to the request. The issued digital token is stored as part of a transaction record in PC


12


for printing at a later time. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the transaction record is stored in a hidden file in DLL storage area


41


on hard drive


24


. Each transaction record is indexed in the hidden file according to addressee information. It has been discovered that this method of issuing and storing digital tokens provides an additional benefit that one or more digital tokens can be reissued whenever a token has not been printed or if a problem has occurred preventing a printing of postage indicia with the token.




By storing digital tokens as part of transaction records in PC


12


the digital tokens can be accessed at a later time for the generation and printing of indicia which is done in PC


12


. Furthermore, if a digital token is lost, i.e., not properly printed on a mailpiece, the digital token can be reissued from DLL


40


rather than from vault


20


. The storage of transaction records that include vault status at the end of each transaction provides a backup to the vault with regard to accounting information as well as a record of issued tokens. The number of transaction records stored on hard drive


24


may be limited to a predetermined number, preferably including all transactions since the last refill of vault


20


.




Referring now to

FIGS. 5A-5C

, when power is applied, at step


200


, to vault


20


, i.e. when card is inserted into controller


32


, the vault initializes itself. At step


202


, vault


20


checks the integrity of the funds stored in the redundant NVM


46


. If bad, vault


20


sets itself into a disabled state, at step


204


. If the NVM data is correct, then, at step


206


, the registers related to postal funds, i.e., the ascending, descending and piece count registers, are loaded to RAM


45


and the most recent transaction record is also loaded into RAM


45


. After verifying the data integrity of NVM


46


and copying the most recent records into vault's RAM


45


, vault


20


is initialized and thereafter waits for an external command, at step


208


.




When a status command is received, at step


210


, vault


20


replies to PC


12


with its current status, at step


212


and waits to receive another command at step


208


. If a status command is not received, then at step


214


, if a password is required to access vault


20


functions, at step


216


an entered password is checked for correctness. If a password is not required at step


214


, or if a correct password is detected at step


216


, the vault checks for a date command. If an incorrect password is detected at step


216


, a status message is sent to user application program


36


via DLL


40


at step


212


.




When a command to set the date is received, at step


218


, for the first time in a particular month, the vault, at step


220


, sets the date and derives token generation keys for the month from master keys stored in NVM


46


of the vault and sends a status message to user application program


36


via DLL


40


at step


212


and waits to receive another command at step


208


. The vault then enables itself and is ready to receive a token request command. Once the date is set, when another date set command is received in the same month, the vault simply acknowledges the command and sets the date without re-calculating the token generation keys. If a date command is not received at step


218


, then at step


224


, a postage command is received and a postage value, for example, $0.32, is set at step


226


a status message is sent to user application program


36


via DLL


40


at step


212


. If a set postage command is not received at step


224


, the vault checks for a token request command.




When a token request command comprising a destination postal code is received by vault


20


, at step


228


, the vault checks the format of and the range of values in the request at steps


234


-


240


. If the request is improper, vault


20


rejects the request (or if a request is not received) and processes other commands, such as inquiries, at step


230


, and waits to receive a command at step


208


. After step


228


, vault


20


checks the date in the request, at step


234


, and if the date is set the vault then compares, at step


236


, the requested postage amount with the two warning values: high value warning and the postage limit amount. If no date is set at step


234


, a status message is sent to user application program


36


via DLL


40


at step


212


. If the requested postage amount exceeds the warning values at step


236


, the request is rejected and a status message is sent to user application program


36


via DLL


40


at step


212


. Vault


20


then compares, at step


238


, the requested postage amount with available postal funds in the descending register. If the amount of available postal funds is smaller than the requested amount, the vault rejects the token request command and sends an appropriate message to user application program


36


via DLL


40


at step


212


. If the amount of available postal funds is greater than or equal to the requested amount, vault


20


checks the destination information at step


240


. If the zip code format is proper, at step


240


, then accounting process is initiated at step


242


. If not proper, a status message is sent to user application program


36


via DLL


40


at step


212


.




Finally, at step


242


vault


20


begins the accounting process to issue a digital token. Vault


20


deducts the requested postage amount from the available postal funds, i.e., adds the amount to the ascending register and subtracts the amount from the descending register, in RAM. At step


244


a digital token is calculated using an open system algorithm which includes addressee information. At step


246


, vault


20


constructs in RAM


45


a transaction record that includes the piece count and the calculated token and stores the transaction record in an indexed file in the redundant NVM


46


. In the preferred embodiment, the NVM transaction file is indexed by piece count. After storing to NVM, vault


20


checks, at step


248


, the integrity of NVM


46


to confirm that the data is stored correctly. If an error occurs during this process, tokens are not issued and an error message is reopened to the host processor in PC


12


. If no error occurs, a transmission buffer that consists of the transaction record is assembled and vault


20


transmits, at step


250


, the transaction record to DLL


40


in PC


12


. At step


252


, the transaction record is stored in DLL


40


and in DLL storage area


41


. If vault


20


does not receive a positive acknowledgment from PC


12


, vault


20


retransmits the message.




Conventional postage meters store transactions in the meter. In accordance with the present invention, Transaction Capture sub-module


82


captures each transaction record received from vault


20


and records the transaction record in DLL


40


and in DLL storage area


41


on hard drive


24


for a historical record. If there is ample room on hard drive


24


, such transaction captures can be stored for a plurality of different vaults. Referring now to

FIG. 6

, from the moment that a communication session is established, Transaction Capture sub-module


82


monitors message traffic at step


120


, selectively captures each transaction record for token generations and refills when a transaction is detected at step


122


, and stores such transaction records in DLL


40


at step


124


in an invisible and write-protected file


83


in DLL storage area


41


at step


126


. The information stored for each transaction record includes, for example, vault serial number, date, piece count, postage, postal funds available (descending register), tokens, destination postal code and a block check character. A predetermined number of the most recent records initiated by PC


12


are stored in file


83


which is an historical file indexed according to piece count. File


83


represents the mirror image of vault


20


at the time of the transaction except for the encryption keys and configuration parameters. Storing transaction records on hard drive


24


provides backup capability which is described below. In accordance with the present invention transaction records are maintained for a plurality of issued digital tokens for a predetermined time or count.




Conventional postage meters store transactions in the meter. In accordance with the present invention, Transaction Capture sub-module


82


captures each transaction record received from vault


20


and records the transaction record in DLL


40


and in DLL storage area


41


on hard drive


24


for a historical record. If there is ample room on hard drive


24


, such transaction captures can be stored for a plurality of different vaults. Referring now to

FIG. 6

, from the moment that a communication session is established, Transaction Capture sub-module


82


monitors message traffic at step


120


, selectively captures each transaction record for token generations and refills, and stores such transaction records in DLL


40


at step


124


in an invisible and write-protected file


83


in DLL storage area


41


at step


126


. The information stored for each transaction record includes, for example, vault serial number, date, piece count, postage, postal funds available (descending register), tokens, destination postal code and a block check character. A predetermined number of the most recent records initiated by PC


12


are stored in file


83


which is an historical file indexed according to piece count. File


83


represents the mirror image of vault


20


at the time of the transaction except for the encryption keys and configuration parameters. Storing transaction records on hard drive


24


provides backup capability which is described below. In accordance with the present invention transaction records are maintained for a plurality of issued digital tokens for a predetermined time or count.




Referring now to

FIG. 7

, a check is made in PC


12


at step


160


for a token reissue request. If a token reissue request is not detected step


160


is repeated. When detected a search is made, at step


162


. When detected a search is made in the transaction record file


83


for an addressee, or piece count, and date corresponding to the token requested for reissue. If a transaction record is found, at step


164


, for the requested addressee, then a check is made, at step


166


, to verify that the requested date and the transaction record date are the same. If the dates are the same, at step


168


, the indicia bitmap is generated using the transaction record found at step


164


. The generated indicia bitmap is sent to the user interface at step


170


. If no record is found, at step


164


, for the requested addressee, or if the dates are not the same, at step


166


, then a token request is issued, at step


172


, for a new token.




In accordance with the present invention, the entire fixed graphics image


90


of the indicia


92


, shown in

FIG. 9

is stored as compressed data


94


in DLL storage area


41


. Postal data information, including piece count


93




a


, vendor ID


93




b


, postage amount


93




c


, serial number


93




d


, date


93




e


and origination ZIP


93




f


and tokens


93




g


are combined with the fixed graphics image


90


by Indicia Image Creation Module


84


.




Referring now to

FIG. 8

, a process for generating an indicia image for a digital token in the PC-based metering system of

FIG. 1

begins at


140


. Step


142


is repeated until a request for indicia is detected. When a request for indicia is detected from an application program in PC


12


at step


142


, Indicia Image Creation Module


84


checks for a digital token from vault


20


at step


144


. Step


144


is repeated until a token is received from vault


20


. When a token is received, then at step


146


PC


12


generates a bit-mapped indicia image


96


by expanding the compressed fixed graphics image data


94


at step


148


and combining at step


150


the indicia's fixed graphics image


90


with some or all of the postal data information and tokens received from vault


20


. At step


152


, the indicia image is stored in DLL


40


for printing. Sub-module


84


sends to the requesting application program


36


in PC


12


the created bit-mapped indicia image


96


that is ready for printing, and then stores a transaction record comprising the digital tokens and associated postal data in DLL storage area


41


. At this time, the indicia can be printed immediately or at a later time.




Thus, the bit-mapped indicia image


96


is stored in DLL


40


which can only be accessed by executable code in DLL


40


. Furthermore, only the executable code of DLL


40


can access the fixed graphics image


90


of the indicia to generated bit-mapped indicia image


96


. This prevents accidental modification of the indicia because it would be very difficult for a normal user to access, intentionally or otherwise, the fixed graphics image


90


of the indicia and the bit-mapped indicia image


96


.




The present invention is suitable for generating a batch of tokens for addresses in a mailing list rather than entering such list of addressees one at a time. The batch of tokens are part of a batch of transaction records, that are indexed in the transaction file in the DLL storage area


41


, which are later used to generate indicia images when printing envelopes for the mailing list. Such batch processing would be useful, for example, to production mailers which often have databases of addresses from which to generate mail. These databases are usually pre-processed and sorted to take advantage of postal discounts and recipient profiles for direct marketing opportunities.




In an alternate embodiment, a PC-based open metering system is part of a network with the vault connected to a server PC and the user requesting postage from a user PC. The token generation process would proceed as previously described except that the vault functions, including token generation, would occur in the server PC or the vault card connected thereto. The user PC would store the transaction records, including issued tokens, on its hard drive and would generate indicia corresponding thereto. The server PC also stores a record of all transactions for backup and disaster recovery purposes. This configuration would allow multiple users to send a letter to the same addressee without the token generation being inhibited.




While the present invention has been disclosed and described with reference to a single embodiment thereof, it will be apparent, as noted above that variations and modifications may be made therein. It is, thus, intended in the following claims to cover each variation and modification that falls within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.



Claims
  • 1. A method of reissuing digital tokens in a open system meter comprising the steps of:calculating a digital token using predetermined postal information including addressee information, postage amount and piece count; debiting postal funds by the postage amount; issuing the digital token to be used in generating indicia; storing the digital token and the predetermined postal information as part of a transaction record in a transaction record file indexed according to piece count; and reissuing the digital token from the transaction record in the transaction file to regenerate the indicia for a mailpiece when the indicia generated from the digital token has not been successfully printed on the mailpiece for a particular addressee.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of reissuing the digital token is based on addressee information and piece count.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 comprising the further step of:finding the transaction record corresponding to the unprinted digital token according to one of the addressee information and the piece count contained the transaction record file.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of reissuing the digital token is from a historical file on a hard drive of a PC meter.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of reissuing the digital token is from a historical file in a metering unit.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 comprising the further step of:maintaining a plurality of transaction records in the transaction record file for a predetermined time or count.
  • 7. A method of reissuing digital tokens in a open system meter comprising the steps of:sending from a host processor to a vault that is operatively coupled to the host processor predetermined postal information, including addressee information, and a request for digital tokens; calculating in the vault in response to the request for digital tokens at least one digital token using the predetermined postal information; debiting postal funds in the vault; issuing the digital token to the host processor; storing the digital token and the predetermined postal information as a transaction record in the host processor for subsequent generation and printing of indicia; indexing the transaction record corresponding to the addressee information; generating in the host processor a bitmap image of the indicia comprising a graphical image of the digital token and the predetermined postal information and storing the indicia in the host processor for subsequent printing; displaying the generated bitmap image of the indicia for review before printing; and reissuing the digital token from transaction record in the host processor when generated bitmap image has not been successfully printed.
US Referenced Citations (19)
Number Name Date Kind
4725718 Sansone et al. Feb 1988
4757537 Edelmann et al. Jul 1988
4775246 Edelmann et al. Oct 1988
4802027 Talmadge Jan 1989
4809185 Talmadge Feb 1989
4813912 Chickneas et al. Mar 1989
4831555 Sansone et al. May 1989
4858138 Talmadge Aug 1989
4873645 Hunter et al. Oct 1989
5173862 Fedirchuk et al. Dec 1992
5177790 Hazard Jan 1993
5325430 Smyth Jun 1994
5363447 Rager Nov 1994
5365466 Hazard Nov 1994
5390251 Pastor et al. Feb 1995
5448641 Pintsov et al. Sep 1995
5454038 Cordery et al. Sep 1995
5675650 Cordery et al. Oct 1997
5787406 Arsenault et al. Jul 1998
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
0782109 A2 Jul 1997 EP
09-311962 Dec 1997 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (6)
Entry
McKenna: “Tests For PC Postae Scheduled for Mid '97”; Newsbytes News Network, May 27, 1997.*
Costlow: “AT&T, Microsoft take stakes in e-postage startup”; Electronic Engineering Times; Sep. 29, 1997, p. 20.*
Claymon: “Digital Stamps Get Postal Service OK 2 Firms Licensed for Electronic Postage”; San Jose Mercury News (SJ), Aug. 10, 1999.*
“Stamp Of Approval. (the US Postal Services uses Cylink's digital signature and registration technology for Internet postage service)(In Short)(Company Buisness and Marketing)(Government Activity)(Brief article)”; InformationWeek Aug. 16, 1999 p. 61.*
Bass: “The Internet goes Postal—Snail mail at the speed of light? Get ready to purchase postage over the Web”; PC Computing, Sep. 01, 1999, v12, n9, p. 125.*
“E-Postage Fails To Prove Its Value (About 302,000 of estimated 44.7 mil SOHOs have embracedPC postage; eStamp and Stamps.com each had losses in second quarter of this year)”; Internet World, Nov. 01, 2000, p. 28.