The described subject matter relates generally to gas turbine engines, and more particularly to a method for repairing a damaged blade.
Compressor blades of gas turbine engines are subject to foreign object damage (FOD). The nature of the damage could vary depending on the type of the foreign object: nicks, tears, dings and blade bending are common types of damages seen in the field. In order to make the damaged blades flight worthy again, the damaged areas of the airfoil are repaired in a well-defined fashion as outlined in repair and overhaul manuals. A typical blade repair scheme involves a cut out in the area of interest that is in the shape of an arc or “C” shape.
The typical blade repair scheme is not always successful because peak steady stress and peak vibratory stress locations may both coincide at the cutback radius. The peak vibratory stress may correspond to a resonance condition. This coincidence of vibratory and steady stress peaks is a concern from a durability stand point.
There is a need to improve such repair methods.
In accordance with the present disclosure, there is provided a method for repairing a blade in a gas turbine engine comprising: identifying a damage on an edge of an airfoil of the blade; forming a cutback around the damage in the edge, the cutback shaped to comprise at least a pair of fillets r1, r2 in the edge on opposite ends of the cutback, a depth d from the edge, and a length l along the edge.
Further in accordance with the present disclosure, there is provided a blade in a gas turbine engine comprising: an airfoil having a leading edge and a trailing edge; and a cutback machined in at least one edge among the leading and trailing edges at a location of damage, the cutback comprising a shape defined by at least a pair of fillets r1, r2 on opposite ends of the cutback, a depth d from the edge, and a length l along the edge.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, there is provided a gas turbine engine comprising: at least one blade having a leading edge and a trailing edge; and a cutback machined in at least one edge among the leading and trailing edges at a location of damage, the cutback comprising a shape defined by at least a pair of fillets r1, r2 on opposite ends of the cutback, a depth d from the edge, and a length l along the edge.
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures in which:
Still referring to
For example, in proposed applications the length/may be between 1.52 mm and 76.20 mm (0.060″ and 3.0′1 ford between 0.76 mm and 38.10 mm (0.030″ and 1.5″), and for r1, r2 between 0.76 mm and 38.10 mm (0.030″ and 1.5″).
Referring now to
Referring to
The method to repair a damage blade in accordance with the present disclosure comprises identifying a damage on a leading and/or trailing edge of an airfoil of the blade. A cutback 38 is formed about the damage in the leading and/or trailing edge, the cutback shaped to comprise at least a pair of fillets r1, r2 in the edge on opposite ends of the cutback, a depth d from the leading edge, and a length l in the leading or trailing edge. As the skilled reader will appreciate, a d′ is selected to be suitable for the airfoil in question. For example, on larger airfoils like turbofan fan blades, a d′=10d may be appropriate, while on smaller airfoils like high pressure compressor airfoils, it may not be appropriate as d′ would be too large.
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention disclosed. For example, blades in any other suitable type of engines may be repaired with the cutback 38. Still other modifications which fall within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the appended claims.
The present application claims priority on U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/838,022, filed on Jun. 21, 2013.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3561886 | Kreischer, Jr. et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3564689 | Hirtenlechner | Feb 1971 | A |
4326833 | Zelahy et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4611744 | Fraser et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4795313 | Coulon | Jan 1989 | A |
4832252 | Fraser | May 1989 | A |
5033938 | Fraser et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5062205 | Fraser | Nov 1991 | A |
5197191 | Dunkman | Mar 1993 | A |
6238187 | Dulaney | May 2001 | B1 |
6413650 | Dupree et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6508000 | Burke et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6532656 | Wilkins | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6568077 | Hellemann et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575702 | Jackson et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6884964 | Murphy | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7293964 | Gummer | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7780419 | Matheny et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7841834 | Ryznic | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7858897 | Belanger | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8153922 | Belanger | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8299389 | Belanger | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20070084906 | Vargas et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070269316 | Williams | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140377075 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61838022 | Jun 2013 | US |