This application is related to “Memory Device for Repairing a Neighborhood of Rows in a Memory Array Using a Patch Table,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/803,756, filed herewith, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Some memory cells, such as one-time-programmable (OTP) memory cells, cannot be pre-tested to determine whether they can reliably stored data. As a result, redundancy mechanisms can be built-into a memory device, such that, if there is an error in field-programming memory cells in a normal data storage area in the memory device, the data can instead be written to a repair area in the memory device. That way, despite such errors, a data storage system can read and write to the memory device without losing any data. In some memory arrays, data that was successfully stored in a row in a memory array can become unreadable after an adjacent row is written to. For example, in a memory array with antifuse-based memory cells, a leakage path can be caused by a defect that resides in a location that is not electrically visible until the rupture of the antifuse. Once the antifuse is ruptured and a filament is formed, this defect can provide a short circuit between the row being programmed and one or both of its neighboring rows, rendering previously-stored data in a neighboring row unreadable. In such a situation, in addition to repairing the data in the row where the defect was detected, the redundancy mechanism can repair the previously-stored data from the neighboring row. This and other related redundancy mechanisms are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,212,454.
The present invention is defined by the claims, and nothing in this section should be taken as a limitation on those claims.
By way of introduction, the embodiments described below provide a method for repairing a neighborhood of rows in a memory array using a patch table. In one embodiment, (i) first data to be stored in row N in a memory array of a memory device, (ii) second data, if any, stored in row N−1 in the memory array, and (iii) third data, if any, stored in row N+1 in the memory array are stored in a temporary storage area of the memory device. The first data is written in row N in the memory array, and, in response to an error in writing the first data in row N in the memory array, the first data, the second data, if any, and the third data, if any, are written in respective rows in a repair area in the memory device. The addresses of rows N−1, N, and N+1 are added to a table stored in the memory device, wherein the table indicates which rows in the repair area should be used instead of rows N−1, N, and N+1. Other embodiments are disclosed, and each of the embodiments can be used alone or together in combination.
The embodiments will now be described with reference to the attached drawings.
Turning now to the drawings,
The memory device 100 comprises a memory array 120 and a controller 130. Other components of the memory device 100, such as electrical connectors and other components, are not shown in
In this embodiment, the memory array 120 has a patch table area 122, a repair area 124, and a normal data storage area 126. Each of these areas will be discussed in detail below. It should be noted that while
The memory device 100 uses a built-in redundancy mechanism to allow rows in the normal data storage area 126 to be repaired in the repair area 124 during field programming. This built-in redundancy mechanism is performed on a low-level, access-control portion of the memory device 100. Accordingly, higher-level modules and users use the normal data storage area 126 as if it had no defects. The memory device 100 uses the patch table to perform this redundancy. As shown in
The patch table serves as a record of the bad rows in the normal data storage area 126 and is updated as new bad rows are found. By way of brief overview, in operation, the relevant (or all) of the patch tables stored in the patch table area 122 in the memory array 120 are loaded into the patch table area 132 in the volatile memory in the controller 130. In general, as write/read commands are received from the host device 110, the microprocessor 138 checks the appropriate patch table in the patch table area 132 in the controller 130. If the target address is not in the patch table, the write/read operation is performed on the target address. However, if the target address is in the patch table, the microprocessor 138 redirects the write/read operation to the appropriate row in the repair area 124 in the memory array 120. If, during a write operation, a row in the normal data storage area 126 in the memory array 120 is found to be bad, the address of that row is added to the appropriate patch table in the controller 130, which later updates the permanent patch table in the patch table area 122 of the memory array 120.
As mentioned in the background section above and in U.S. Pat. No. 7,212,454, which is hereby incorporated by reference, data that was successfully stored in a row in a memory array can become unreadable after an adjacent row is written to. For example, in a memory array with antifuse-based memory cells, a leakage path can be caused by a defect that resides in a location that is not electrically visible until the rupture of the antifuse. Once the antifuse is ruptured and a filament is formed, this defect can provide a short circuit between the row being programmed and one or both of its neighboring rows, rendering previously-stored data in a neighboring row unreadable. In this embodiment, the redundancy mechanism built-into the memory device 100 is designed to address this problem. This mechanism will be discussed in conjunction with the flow charts in
In this embodiment, a defect on one row will render one or both of the two adjacent rows unusable, and the redundancy mechanism of the memory device 100 is able to repair all two or three rows, if necessary. To be ready to do this, before the attempt is made to write the page to the normal data storage area 126, the microprocessor 138 loads the page from the write buffer 136 and the neighboring physical pages into the neighborhood cache 134 (act 350). (If a write buffer 136 is not used, the page data to be written to the memory array 120 can be directly loaded into the neighborhood cache 134.) Accordingly, the neighborhood cache 134 in this embodiment is a three-row (six page) cache: (i) data to be stored in row N in the memory array 120 (i.e., the page of data to be written in the write operation) as well as the other page, if any, that was previously stored in row N, (ii) data, if any, stored in row N−1 in the memory array 120, and (iii) third data, if any, stored in row N+1 in the memory array 120. In this way, the neighborhood cache 134 maintains a moving window of a six-page/three-row neighborhood centered around the current physical address being accessed. “If any” refers to the fact that there may not be data stored in one or both of the neighboring rows. For example, if the normal data storage area 126 of the memory array 120 is written in a top-to-bottom fashion, when data is to be written to row N, there may be data stored in row N−1 but not in row N+1. In such a situation, only the data is to be written to row N and the data stored in row N−1 can be written to the neighborhood cache 134. However, as row N+1 may no longer be usable, it may be preferred to also load the neighborhood cache 134 with the data to be stored in row N+1. In this way, if an error occurs, data for all three rows can be written during the patch operation instead of just writing two rows and waiting for a later write operation to patch row N+1.
Returning to the flow chart 300 in
If an error is not detected, the microprocessor 138 returns a “write done” message back to the host device 110 (act 390). If an error is detected, the microprocessor 138 patches the three-row neighborhood stored in the neighborhood cache 134 to the repair area 124. This operation is described in more detail in
After acts 420-440 are performed, the microprocessor 138 determines if there are any more rows in the neighborhood cache 134 (act 450). If there are no more rows, the microprocessor 138 writes the patch table back to the patch table area 122 of the memory array 120, and the patching operation is complete (act 470). If there are more rows, acts 420-450 are repeated. In this embodiment, to avoid encountering a row short in the repair area 124, each repair row in the repair area 124 is written so that the intervening rows are left blank. Data in the patch table is also written with intervening blank rows in order to provide the same defect tolerance. This is shown in the illustration of
Returning to the drawings,
There are many alternatives that can be used with these embodiments. For example, in the embodiment described above, the data to be written was copied from the write buffer 134 into the neighborhood cache 134, so that, during a patch operation, the data is read out of the neighborhood cache 134 and into the repair row. In an alternate embodiment, the data to be written is not copied into the neighborhood cache 134 but is read out write buffer 134 during a patch operation. In yet another alternate embodiment, instead of using a patch table, redundancy pointers can be used to indicate a bad row and the appropriate repair row. This and other redundancy alternatives are described in more detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,212,454 and 6,868,022 and U.S. Patent Application Nos. US 2006-0140026 and US 2003-0115518, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Some of the following claims may state that a component is operative to perform a certain function or configured for a certain task. It should be noted that these are not restrictive limitations. It should also be noted that the acts recited in the claims can be performed in any order—not necessarily in the order in which they are recited. Additionally, the term “temporary storage area,” as may be used in the claims, refers to a storage area in the memory device that stores data prior to storage in the memory array 120. As such, in the embodiment described above, the temporary storage area took the form of the neighborhood cache 134. However, as illustrated by the alternatives discussed above, the temporary storage area can additionally include the write buffer 136 and/or the patch table area 132, since each of those components stores data prior to storage in the memory array 120. The temporary storage area can be a single area in a one memory array, multiple areas in one memory array, or multiple areas in multiple memory arrays. Although the word “temporary” is used, the temporary storage area is not limited to volatile memory (such as SRAM) and can take any form. Further, the temporary storage area preferably, but not necessarily, has a smaller storage capacity than the memory array 120.
It is intended that the foregoing detailed description be understood as an illustration of selected forms that the invention can take and not as a definition of the invention. It is only the following claims, including all equivalents, that are intended to define the scope of this invention. Finally, it should be noted that any aspect of any of the preferred embodiments described herein can be used alone or in combination with one another.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4523313 | Nibby et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4646266 | Ovshinsky et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4694454 | Matsuura | Sep 1987 | A |
5130777 | Galbraith et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5278839 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5313425 | Lee et al. | May 1994 | A |
5329488 | Hashimoto | Jul 1994 | A |
5359569 | Fujita et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5379259 | Fujita | Jan 1995 | A |
5432729 | Carson et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5469450 | Cho et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5498979 | Parlour et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5535173 | Carre et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5579265 | Devin | Nov 1996 | A |
5642318 | Knaack et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5701267 | Masuda et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5708667 | Hayashi | Jan 1998 | A |
5742934 | Shinohara | Apr 1998 | A |
5748545 | Lee et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751647 | O'Toole | May 1998 | A |
5757700 | Kobayashi | May 1998 | A |
5784391 | Konigsburg | Jul 1998 | A |
5796694 | Shirane | Aug 1998 | A |
5815448 | Horiguchi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5831989 | Fujisaki | Nov 1998 | A |
5835396 | Zhang | Nov 1998 | A |
5835509 | Sako et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5872790 | Dixon | Feb 1999 | A |
5909049 | McCollum | Jun 1999 | A |
5920502 | Noda et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5943254 | Bakeman, Jr. et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5986950 | Joseph | Nov 1999 | A |
6016269 | Peterson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026476 | Rosen | Feb 2000 | A |
6034882 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6055180 | Gudesen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6185122 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205564 | Kim et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216247 | Creta et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236587 | Gudesen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6407953 | Cleeves et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6420215 | Knall et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438044 | Fukuda | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6446242 | Lien et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6462988 | Harari | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487749 | Tsui | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498749 | Cuppens et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6515923 | Cleeves | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525953 | Johnson | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6545501 | Bailis et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6567287 | Scheuerlein | May 2003 | B2 |
6574145 | Kleveland et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6591394 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6597595 | Ichiriu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6625073 | Beffa | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6658438 | Moore et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661730 | Scheuerlein et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6728126 | Issaq et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728149 | Akamatsu | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6792565 | Koyama | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6868002 | Saito et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6895490 | Moore et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6996660 | Moore et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003619 | Moore et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7062602 | Moore et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7142471 | Fasoli et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7178072 | Mullins et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7212454 | Kleveland et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7257733 | Nadeau-Dostie et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20020028541 | Lee et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020085431 | Jeon et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020124130 | Iida et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020162062 | Hughes et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020196687 | Sauvageau et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030021176 | Hogan | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030115514 | Ilkbahar et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115518 | Kleveland et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120858 | March et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040008554 | Kanamori et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040100831 | Knall et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040153744 | Driscoll | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040255089 | Unno | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257891 | Kim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050044459 | Scheuerlein et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050078537 | So et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050081093 | Joly et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050094449 | Hidaka | May 2005 | A1 |
20050207244 | Takenaka | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060139988 | Tran et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060140026 | Ilkbahar et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060291303 | Kleveland et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070136640 | Jarrar | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070171753 | Morgan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174718 | Fouquet-Lapar | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070266202 | Mukaida | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080285365 | Bosch et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 265 031 | Sep 1993 | GB |
WO 9914763 | Aug 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080288813 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |