The present invention relates to a method for repairing a protective lining of an industrial reaction or transport vessel, such as a converter vessel, electric arc furnace, or ladle, e.g. steel casting ladle, pig iron ladle, torpedo ladle or slag ladle. In particular, the present invention relates to a method for repairing a protective lining of an industrial reaction or transport vessel, wherein areas of the lining having a thickness below a pre-determined threshold value are identified and monolithic lining material is applied onto those areas.
Industrial reaction or transport vessels, such as blast furnaces, electric arc furnaces, ladles or converters, are e.g. used for metallurgical purposes such as for producing steel. These vessels generally have a protective lining at their inner surface, which protects the outer metallic surface of the vessel from being damaged by the heat or reaction conditions inside the vessel. However, the protective lining is subjected to wear during the use of the vessels and must be repaired from time to time to ensure high operational safety.
For this purpose, the residual thickness of the protective lining is measured between the individual phases of use of the vessel, when the vessel is empty. The residual thickness data obtained by this measurement are used to determine the areas of the lining which have to be repaired.
International Patent Application WO 01/38900 A1 discloses a non-contacting measuring procedure for measuring the residual thickness of the refractory lining of a metallurgical vessel. The method comprises sweeping a laser beam from a measuring device over the inner surface of the metallurgical vessel, i.e. the surface of the refractory lining, and measuring the angle and the distance between measuring device and inner surface of the vessel at various points. The measuring device preferably includes a laser diode operating in a pulse mode as a transmitting device and a photodiode as a receiving device. The thus obtained data allow to image the surface structure of the refractory lining in the form of a three-dimensional thickness profile. WO 01/38900 A1 suggests that the measuring device is physically associated with a device which applies new lining material to the inside surface of the vessel.
However, the lining material is generally applied manually to the inside surface of the vessel, either by means of an operator holding a repair device or by means of a repair device which is manually manipulated by an operator via a remote. In both cases the operator must be able to visibly identify the areas to be repaired and follow the movements of the repair device. Therefore, the operator has to be relatively close to the open-end of the vessel to be repaired. This is connected with several drawbacks. The operator is exposed to heat, fire, rebound of new lining material and other parts falling off the vessel. Furthermore, there is the danger of explosion in the vessels, if the hot material gets into contact with water, which may cause harm to the operator, if the operator is close to the vessel.
Moreover, the manual method is inherently connected with human errors. For instance, if the operator misses the right spot to be repaired, e.g. by a few centimeters, there is the danger of causing a so called “breakthrough”, which is a hole in the wall of the vessel, and may harm the operator of the vessel or damage the equipment connected with the vessel or even lead to explosions if the material flowing out of the vessel comes in contact with water. This may be a problem because it is difficult to visibly identify the areas to be repaired if the protective lining is entirely monolithic, and the operator can only obtain a rough guidance by the measurement of the thickness profile carried out before.
If the operator actually holds the repair device, the output of new lining material is generally limited. Furthermore, because of the heat, repair time under control of an operator is generally limited to 10 to 15 minutes.
Accordingly it would be highly desirable to provide a method for repairing a refractory lining of a metallurgical vessel which is more accurate than the methods according to the state of the art, using less material and which eliminates the operational dangers mentioned before.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for repairing a monolithic lining of an industrial reaction or transport vessel which can be performed automatically, at high speed and high accuracy.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a method for repairing a monolithic lining of an industrial reaction or transport vessel where the operational dangers are eliminated.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method for repairing a monolithic lining of an industrial reaction or transport vessel which uses lining material more effectively.
It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a method for repairing a monolithic lining of an industrial reaction or transport vessel which is easily adaptable to operational requirements.
In its broadest aspect, the present invention provides a method for repairing a protective lining of an industrial reaction or transport vessel including the steps of
identifying combined areas of the lining having a thickness below a pre-determined threshold value by means of a measuring device, which measuring device measures the residual thickness of the lining and a processing unit, which processing unit in a first step transforms the residual thickness data into binary data, by comparing the measured residual thickness data with the pre-determined threshold value for the thickness of the lining, and assigning the binary value “1” to areas of the lining having a thickness below the pre-determined threshold value, and the binary value “0” to areas of the lining having a thickness equal or higher than the pre-determined threshold value, or vice versa, in a second step combines isolated areas of the lining having a thickness below the pre-determined threshold value into combined areas of the lining to which the binary value for areas of the lining having a thickness below the predetermined threshold value is assigned, and in a third step computes the position and repair sequence of each of the combined areas and transfers these data to a repair device,
For actual performance of the repair, a repair device is provided which applies new lining material onto the damaged areas of the lining and which preferably includes a manipulator arm and a gunning nozzle which is disposed thereon and is rotatable, tiltable, vertically movable, and optionally horizontally movable. The position and operation of the repair device is controlled by a processing unit which transfers the actual residual thickness data obtained by means of the measuring device to the repair device in the form of repairing instructions. The processing unit is preferably electronically connected with both, the measuring device and the repair device.
The present method includes number of processing steps for transferring the actual residual thickness data obtained by means of the measuring device to the repair device in the form of repair instructions. The residual thickness data are preferably sorted with reference to a regular grid which reflects the symmetry of the vessel. Since the preferred metallurgical vessels have a basic shape which substantially is in the form of a cylinder the residual thickness data are preferably converted into matrices and cylinder coordinates. If the vessel has a rectangular horizontal cross section, the residual thickness data are preferably converted into matrices and cartesian coordinates.
The processing steps include transforming the residual thickness data into binary data, by comparing the residual thickness data with the pre-determined threshold value for the thickness of the lining, and e.g. assigning the binary value “1” to areas of the lining having a thickness below the pre-determined threshold value, and the binary value “0” to areas of the lining having a thickness equal or higher than the pre-determined threshold value, hereinafter referred to as “binarization”.
To reduce the amount of data to be processed, before binarization, the three-dimensional residual-thickness data obtained by the measuring device of a number of points in the vessel may preferably be averaged in the processing unit, in a first processing step referred to as “averaging”.
After binarization, isolated areas of the lining having a thickness below the pre-determined threshold value are combined into adjacent combined areas of the lining to which the binary value for areas of the lining having a thickness below the pre-determined threshold value is assigned, which processing step is hereinafter referred to as “defragmentation”. For achieving this, the binary values of a number of areas are preferably compared with each other, and, if the number of areas of the lining having a thickness below the pre-determined threshold value exceeds a pre-selected ratio, the whole compared area is assigned the binary value for areas having a thickness below the pre-determined threshold value. Thereby the fact is accepted that areas of the lining having a thickness equal or higher than the pre-determined threshold value adjacent to areas of the lining having a thickness below the pre-determined threshold value will be sprayed on with new lining material as well, although these areas do not require a repair yet. A preferred ratio is e.g. from about 30 percent to about 80 percent, most preferably from about 50 percent to about 60 percent.
The defragmentation can be carried out using different degrees of defragmentation. Preferably, the degree of defragmentation is varied as a function of the production-related boundary conditions such as the uniformity in reconstituting the refractory lining, mass of the relining compound, and time of repair.
Finally, the position and repair sequence of each of the combined areas is computed and converted into repair instructions for the repair device in a further processing step. Therefore, each computed area having the binary value for areas having a thickness below the pre-determined threshold value is associated with a consecutive number representing the sequence of steps of application of monolithic lining material. This processing step is hereinafter referred to as “sequencing”. The sequence is preferably selected, taking into account the static characteristics and the curing behavior of the repair material that is applied onto the inner surface of the monolithic lining, in particular the curing time of the repair material. In particular, the preferred sequence takes into account that the refractory lining has to be repaired from the lower sections of the metallurgical vessel to its upper sections. Thereby the repair material, if applied in form of horizontal strips to the repair areas, is supported by the relining compound applied in adjacent lower sections before.
In a particularly preferred aspect of the invention, the residual-thickness data are processed to obtain repair data in such a way that the shape of each area to be repaired, as seen towards the surface of the refractory lining, is enlarged into a simple geometrical basic shape, preferably a rectangle. Thereby the working speed of the repair device may be further increased.
In a further particularly preferred aspect of the invention, the orientation and form of the geometrical basic shape is adapted, in the processing unit, to the existing axes of motion of the repair device, which is preferably a spraying, a gunning or a shotcreting device and the like. With this adaptation the repair device can be moved along its existing axes of motion in order to perform the repair of the refractory lining. Thereby the working speed of the repair device is increased and the repair device is easier to control. This processing step is preferably carried out after defragmentation, and is hereinafter referred to as “segmentation”.
In a further preferred aspect of the present invention, prior to determining the sequence of steps of application of monolithic lining material, the steps of binarization, defragmentation, and optionally segmentation are carried out again under variation of the threshold value, so that deeper holes may be repaired in multiple repair steps by applying a multiplicity of layers of monolithic lining material.
In a still further, particularly preferred aspect, prior to a transfer of the repair data to the repair device, the result of the repair is represented in the processing unit by means of a simulation under consideration of specific operational parameters such as the time of repair, and amount of the repair compound. Thus, the operator of the processing unit may easily adapt the repair procedure to varying conditions.
It is particularly preferred that, after completion of the spraying step, the residual thickness of the refractory lining is once again measured by the measuring device and the thus obtained residual thickness data are compared with data obtained by a simulation regarding the achievable reconstitution of the refractory lining, and in case of a deviation between the newly measured residual thickness data and the simulation data, the control unit of the repair device is calibrated accordingly. Alternatively, a further repair step may be started.
The invention will be exemplary described below in more detail with reference to the attached figures, wherein
In particular,
The residual thickness data determined by measuring device 8 are transferred from measuring device 8 to a processing unit 7. The processing unit 7 carries out the steps described herein before to process the residual thickness data received from the measuring device 8 into repair instructions for the repair device 3.
In
An example of a defragmented matrix of the identical cut-out is shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102 23 284 | May 2002 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP03/05332 | 5/21/2003 | WO | 00 | 2/22/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/100336 | 12/4/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3469030 | Priebe | Sep 1969 | A |
3716316 | Dekker et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3827633 | Kouno et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3917170 | Marino | Nov 1975 | A |
4019130 | Sakamoto et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4107244 | Ochiai et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4227802 | Scholdstrom et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4272018 | Hickson | Jun 1981 | A |
4649858 | Sakai et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4688773 | Legille et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4690328 | Roehl | Sep 1987 | A |
4860422 | Marino | Aug 1989 | A |
4913649 | van der Hoeff | Apr 1990 | A |
5127736 | Neiheisel | Jul 1992 | A |
5178329 | Yang | Jan 1993 | A |
5212738 | Chande et al. | May 1993 | A |
5419922 | Bajek | May 1995 | A |
5523685 | Kasai et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5695558 | Eastwood | Dec 1997 | A |
5792393 | Smirnoff | Aug 1998 | A |
6034345 | Firestone | Mar 2000 | A |
20020158368 | Wirth, Jr. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0121617 | Oct 1984 | EP |
1632978 | Mar 1991 | SU |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050263945 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |