The present invention relates to dual mode communication. More particularly, the present invention relates to an apparatus and method that allows a dual mode User Equipment (UE) to efficiently report its capability information.
Mobile communication systems have been developed to provide users with communication services while they are moving. With the rapid development of communication technology, mobile communication systems can provide high speed data communication services as well as voice communication.
A Long Term Evolution (LTE) system, which is a next generation mobile communication system, is standardized in the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). The LTE system implements high speed packet based communication at a data transfer rate of up to 100 Mbps, which is higher than the current data transfer rate.
In recent years, the LTE communication system has been combined with other technologies to enhance the transfer rate, and this is called Long Term Evolution-Advanced (LTE-A) system. A technology introduced by the LTE system is carrier aggregation. Carrier aggregation enables one UE to use a number of forward carriers and a number of reverse carriers, compared with the technology of the related are in which a UE performs data transmission/reception only using one forward carrier and one reverse carrier. To support carrier aggregation, a UE can be equipped with additional functions and parts, which are mandatory and optional, respectively.
When an evolved Node B (eNB) establishes a wireless channel with the UE, it needs to precisely detect the capability of the UE. To this end, a procedure has been defined in which the UE reports its capabilities to a network. However, the conventional capability information was designed for a single mode UE. Therefore, a system and method is required that allows a dual mode UE to efficiently report its capability information.
The above information is presented as background information only to assist with an understanding of the present disclosure. No determination has been made, and no assertion is made, as to whether any of the above might be applicable as prior art with regard to the present invention.
Aspects of the present invention are to address at least the above-mentioned problems and/or disadvantages and to provide at least the advantages described below. Accordingly, an aspect of the present invention is to provide an apparatus and method that allows a dual mode User Equipment (UE) to efficiently report its capability information.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a method for transmitting, by a UE that supports Frequency Division Duplex (FDD) and Time Division Duplex (TDD), UE capability information to an evolved Node B (eNB), is provided. The method includes receiving a message requesting UE capability information from the eNB, generating first capability information and second capability information according to the UE capability information requesting message, and transmitting UE capability information including the first and second capability information to the eNB. The first capability information comprises FDD capability information applicable to an FDD mode or TDD capability information applicable to a TDD mode. The second capability information comprises capability information applicable to both the FDD mode and the TDD mode.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a UE that supports FDD and TDD is provided. The UE includes a transceiver for receiving a message requesting UE capability information from an eNB, and a controller for generating first capability information and second capability information according to the UE capability information requesting message. The transceiver transmits UE capability information including the first and second capability information to the eNB. The first capability information comprises FDD capability information applicable to an FDD mode or TDD capability information applicable to a TDD mode. The second capability information comprises capability information applicable to both the FDD mode and the TDD mode.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method for receiving, by an eNB, capability information regarding a UE is provided. The method includes transmitting a message requesting UE capability information to the UE, and receiving UE capability information including first capability information and second capability information, in response to the request message, from the UE. The first capability information comprises FDD capability information applicable to an FDD mode or TDD capability information applicable to a TDD mode. The second capability information comprises capability information applicable to both the FDD mode and the TDD mode.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, an eNB is provided. The eNB includes a transceiver for transmitting a message requesting UE capability information to a UE, and for receiving UE capability information including first capability information and second capability information, in response to the request message, from the UE. The first capability information comprises FDD capability information applicable to an FDD mode or DD capability information applicable to a TDD mode. The second capability information comprises capability information applicable to both the FDD mode and the TDD mode.
Other aspects, advantages, and salient features of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which, taken in conjunction with the annexed drawings, discloses exemplary embodiments of the invention.
The above and other aspects, features, and advantages of certain exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be more apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Throughout the drawings, it should be noted that like reference numbers are used to depict the same or similar elements, features, and structures.
The following description with reference to the accompanying drawings is provided to assist in a comprehensive understanding of exemplary embodiments of the invention as defined by the claims and their equivalents. It includes various specific details to assist in that understanding but these are to be regarded as merely exemplary. Accordingly, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that various changes and modifications of the embodiments described herein can be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. In addition, descriptions of well-known functions and constructions may be omitted for clarity and conciseness.
The terms and words used in the following description and claims are not limited to the bibliographical meanings, but, are merely used by the inventor to enable a clear and consistent understanding of the invention. Accordingly, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the following description of exemplary embodiments of the present invention is provided for illustration purpose only and not for the purpose of limiting the invention as defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
It is to be understood that the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a component surface” includes reference to one or more of such surfaces.
Detailed descriptions of well-known functions and structures incorporated herein may be omitted to avoid obscuring the subject matter of the invention. Exemplary embodiments of the invention are described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
The eNBs 105, 110, 115 and 120 correspond to conventional Node Bs of the Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) system and each eNB controls a number of cells. However, eNBs 105, 110, 115 or 120, any of which can provide service to the UE 135 via a wireless channel, perform more complicated functions than a conventional Node B. Since LTE systems provide real time services, such as Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), and all user traffic via a shared channel, they require devices that can collect state information, such as a UE buffer state, an available transmission power state, a channel state, etc., in order to schedule, for example, eNBs 105, 110, 115 and 120. In order to implement a transfer rate of 100 Mbps, an LTE system employs Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) at a bandwidth of 20 MHz, as a wireless access technology. LTE systems also employ Adaptive Modulation & Coding (AMC) to determine a modulation scheme and a channel coding rate, meeting with the channel state of the UE. The S-GW 130 provides a data bearer and creates or removes data bearers according to the control of the MME 125. The MME 125 manages the mobility of a UE, controls a variety of functions, and connects to a number of eNBs.
Referring to
Referring to
For example, the UE 305 and the eNB 310 can set a Discontinuous Reception (DRX) feature in order to allow the UE 305 to prevent excessive battery power from being consumed at step 315. The UE 305 and the eNB 310 can set a short DRX feature to maximally save the battery power in the UE 305 according to a traffic state at step 320. The UE 305 and the eNB 310 can set a Semi-Persistent Scheduling (SPS) feature to efficiently support a voice service at step 325. The UE 305 and the eNB 310 can set a 64 Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (64 QAM) feature to increase the transfer rate of the UE 305 close to the eNB 310 at step 330. The UE 305 and the eNB 310 can set a UE specific reference signal feature at step 335. Since none of steps 315 to 335 are mandatory, any or all of them may or may not be performed.
In order to set a specific feature to the UE 305 according to states, the eNB 310 needs to determine whether the UE 305 has implemented a corresponding feature and has been subjected to an Inter-Operability Test (TOT). More particularly, the eNB 310 must perform the determination if the UE 305 is a dual mode type of UE that supports both Frequency Division Duplex (FDD) and Time Division Duplex (TDD). A dual mode UE may support a feature in only one mode, or may perform IOT for a feature in only one mode. In that case, the UE 305 needs to report, to the eNB 310, a mode where a corresponding function for a feature can be executed or a mode where a feature has been subjected to an IOT. Exemplary embodiments of the present invention provide a system and method that can efficiently report information regarding the respective modes. A dual mode UE refers to a type of UE that can support two duplex modes, i.e., FDD and TDD. A duplex mode corresponds to a frequency band, one-to-one. Therefore, a dual mode UE can support at least one FDD band and at least one TDD band.
Referring to
The UE 405 exchanges an RRC CONNECTION SETUP REQUEST message and an RRC CONNECTION SETUP message with an eNB 410 at step 425. The UE 405 and the eNB 410 establish an RRC connection therebetween to transmit control messages to each other. The RRC CONNECTION SETUP REQUEST message includes an identifier of the UE 405 and a cause for RRC connection setup. The RRC CONNECTION SETUP message includes Signaling Radio Bearer (SRB) setup information, MAC setup information, PHY setup information, etc., SRB refers to wireless bearer for serving an RRC control message.
The UE 405 transmits an RRC CONNECTION SETUP COMPLETE message to the eNB 410 at step 430. The RRC CONNECTION SETUP COMPLETE message includes a Non-Access-Stratum (NAS) message intended for an MME 415. The NAS message includes information indicating that the capabilities of the UE 405 have been altered. The capabilities of the UE 405 are stored in the MME 415. When an RRC connection is set up between the UE 405 and the eNB 410, the MME 415 transmits radio communication related capability of the UE 405 to the eNB 410. This prevents the UE 405 from reporting its capabilities to the eNB 410 each time that an RRC connection is setup therebetween. Therefore, after the UE 405 moves from an FDD network to a TDD network or from a TDD network to an FDD network, it can report the new UE capability information by transmitting information indicating that the UE capability has been altered to the corresponding network.
The eNB 410 transmits the NAS message included in the RRC CONNECTION SETUP COMPLETE message to the MME 415 at step 435. The NAS message refers to control messages exchanged between the UE 405 and the MME 415. When the UE 405 is turned on, it transmits an ATTACH REQUEST NAS message to the MME 415. If the UE 405 that has been turned on newly sets up an RRC connection, it transmits a SERVICE REQUEST NAS message to the MME 415. If the UE 405 moves to a new tracking area, it transmits a TRACKING AREA UPDATE NAS message to the MME 415. When the MME 415 receives NAS messages from the UE 405, it performs a corresponding operation according to the type of NAS message and information included therein.
If the MME 415 receives an NAS message including information indicating that the capability information of the UE 405 has been altered, the MME 415 performs an INITIAL CONTEXT SETUP process with respect to the eNB 410, in order to acquire the new capability information of the UE 405, at step 440. During the INITIAL CONTEXT SETUP process, the MME 415 transmits information, required to provide services to the UE 405, to the eNB 410. For example, the MME 415 may transmit, to the eNB 410, information related to security, Quality of Service (QoS), and the like. The MME 415 also transmits UE capability information related to radio communication to the eNB 410 during the INITIAL CONTEXT SETUP process. Since the MME 415 has recognized that the capability of the UE 405 has been altered at step 440, it does not transmit the UE capability information related to radio communication to the eNB 410. Therefore, the eNB 410 can start to acquire the UE capability information. That is, when the eNB 410 may not receive the UE capability information during the INITIAL CONTEXT SETUP process, it can acquire the UE capability information via the following steps 445, 450, and 455. Alternatively, the eNB 410 may perform a process for acquiring UE capability information via preset conditions, e.g., after a preset period of time has elapsed, according to an additional request, etc.
The eNB 410 transmits a control UE capability enquiry message to the UE 405, which instructs the UE 405 to report its capabilities, at step 445. That is, the eNB 410 instructs the UE 405 to report its capability related to a Radio Access Technology (RAT) via the UE capability enquiry message. Since the eNB 410 requires UE capability related to Evolved UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRA) from the UE 405 at step 445, the UE capability enquiry message may include information that instructs the UE 405 to report E-UTRA capability.
The UE 405 transmits its capabilities to the eNB 410 at step 450. The UE capability information message may include a preset format of UE capability information as shown in Table 1.
More detailed information regarding the entities, described in Table 1, may be acquired referring to 3GPP Technical Specification (TS) 36.331. For example, rf-Parameter includes information regarding frequency bands supported by a UE. The frequency bands are defined as shown in Table 2.
The UE 405 reports the number of frequency bands that it supports, via rf-Parameters. The frequency bands are classified into an FDD band and a TDD band. If the UE 405 supports only an FDD band, it is a UE that operates in an FDD band. Likewise, if the UE 405 supports only a TDD band, it is a UE that operates in a TDD band. If the UE 405 supports both the FDD and the TDD bands, it is a dual mode UE that operates in both the FDD bands and the TDD bands.
The featureGroupIndicators refers to information showing whether the UE 405 is subjected to an IOT with respect to a feature group. The featureGroupIndicators is described in more detail as shown in Table 3. The features included in featureGroupIndicators refer to mandatory features that the UE must implement. For example, if the UE sets bit 3 of Feature Group Indicator (FGI) to ‘1,’ this means that it has implemented 5 bit RLC Unacknowledge Mode (UM) Sequence Number (SN) and 7 bit PDCP SN and has also been subjected to the IOT.
If the dual mode UE supports a feature group in FDD and TDD modes and has been subjected to an IOT for the feature group in the modes, it can set FGI for a corresponding feature group to ‘1.’ However, it frequently occurs that, although the dual mode UE has been subjected to an IOT in an FDD mode, it may not have been subjected to the IOT in a TDD mode or vice versa. In that case, the UE 405 cannot determine how to set up FGI for a corresponding feature group. In order to address the problem, the UE 405 reports two sets of FGIs (sets of FGI bits as described in Table 3). One set of FGI indicates whether the UE 405 has been subjected to an IOT in an FDD mode (hereinafter called an FDD FGI set), and the other set of FGI indicates whether the UE 405 has been subjected to an IOT in a TDD mode (hereinafter called a TDD FGI set).
When the UE 405 transmits two sets of FGIs via a network, if the eNB 410 and the MME 415 are adapted to a system of the previous release version, they cannot detect part of the received information. If the UE 405 is aware of the release version of the eNB 410 or the network, it can transmit FGI corresponding to the release version. However, since the current system does not provide information to infer the release version of the eNB 410 or the network, sets of FGIs must be defined considering that the eNB 410 may not detect information in a new format.
In order to address the problems described above, the field that includes information regarding a set of FGI is determined, referring to a mode of a network (or the eNB 410) to which the UE 405 has established a connection. That is, the UE 405 includes one FGI set in a legacy field (or a default field) and the other FGI set in an extension field. In that case, although a network does not detect the extension field, it can detect FGI in a legacy field. Therefore, a corresponding operation can be executed based on the detected information. If a duplex mode of a network where a connection has been currently established differs from that of an FGI set included in a legacy field, the eNB 410 may mistakenly judge the capability of the UE 405. To address this problem, the UE 405 refers to a mode of a network where a connection has been established at a time point when it reports the capability information, and includes an FGI set of a corresponding mode in a legacy field and an FGI set of the other mode in an extension field. Table 4 describes a conventional Information Entity (IE) for FGI and an IE for FGI of an extension field. It should be understood that Table 4 shows one of the exemplary embodiments.
If the dual mode UE 405 has set up a connection with an FDD network (i.e., if the UE 405 is connected to the eNB 410 operating in an FDD band), it may include an FDD FGI set in a legacy field and a TDD FGI set in an extension field. Alternatively, if the dual mode UE 405 has set up a connection with a TDD network (i.e., if the UE 405 is connected to the eNB 410 operating in a TDD band), it may include a TDD FGI set in a legacy field and an FDD FGI set in an extension field.
The eNB 410 includes the UE capability information, received at step 450, in a UE CAPABILITY INFO INDICATION control message and transmits the message to the MME 415 at step 455. The MME 415 stores the received UE capability information and uses it during the INITIAL CONTEXT SETUP process. The eNB 410 can determine setting information that will be applied to the UE 405, referring to the UE capability information transmitted from the UE 405.
Referring to
After transmitting the RRC CONNECTION SETUP COMPLETE message to the eNB 410, the UE 405 may execute corresponding functions at step 520. In order to acquire new UE capability information regarding the UE 405, the eNB 410 may transmit a UE capability enquiry message to the UE 405 as described above, referring to
When the UE 405 receives the message from the eNB 410 at step 520, it determines whether the mode of the current network is an FDD or TDD mode at step 525. That is, the UE 405 determines whether the operating band of the current cell is an FDD or TDD band. Alternatively, the UE 405 determines whether its current operating band is an FDD or TDD band. Since the current operating band of the UE 405 always matches the operating band of the current cell, the two determining processes are substantially identical to each other. Alternatively, the UE 405 may have previously determined the mode of the current network at step 505. That is, the UE 405 may execute the processes following step 525, based on the mode of the network at a time point that it needs to report the capability information.
If it is determined that the mode of the current network is an FDD mode at step 525, the UE 405 includes an FDD FGI set (i.e., information showing whether an IOT test has been performed in an FDD mode) in a legacy field (which can be understood by a conventional network), and a TDD FGI set (i.e., information showing whether an IOT test has been performed in a TDD mode) in an extension field (which can be understood by a network of a new release version, e.g., Release 10 or Release 11) at step 530. The UE 405 may perform the processes, taking into consideration whether an FDD FGI set and a TDD FGI set are identical to each other. That is, if the FDD FGI set and the TDD FGI set differ from each other, the UE 405 reports them to the eNB 410. If the FDD FGI set and the TDD FGI set are identical to each other, the UE 405 reports one of them to the eNB 410. Alternatively, the UE 405 may perform the processes, taking into consideration whether the FDD capability information is identical to the TDD capability information. For example, if the FDD capability information (e.g., the FDD FGI set) differs from the TDD capability information (e.g., the TDD FGI set), the UE 405 reports the two sets to the eNB 410. If the FDD capability information (e.g., the FDD FGI set) is identical to the TDD capability information (e.g., the TDD FGI set), the UE 405 may not include an extension field. Therefore, if the eNB 410 receives capability information including one FGI set, it concludes that the received capability information can be applied to both TDD and FDD.
On the contrary, if it is determined that the mode of the current network is a TDD mode at step 525, the UE 405 includes a TDD FGI set in a legacy field (which can be understood by a conventional network), and an FDD FGI set (i.e., information showing whether an IOT test has been performed in an FDD mode) in an extension field (which can be understood by a network of a new release version, e.g., Release 10 or Release 11) at step 535. The UE 405 may perform the processes, taking into consideration whether an FDD FGI set and a TDD FGI set are identical to each other. That is, if the FDD FGI set and the TDD FGI set differ from each other, the UE 405 reports them to the eNB 410. If the FDD FGI set and the TDD FGI set are identical to each other, the UE 405 reports one of them to the eNB 410. Alternatively, the UE 405 may perform the processes, taking into consideration whether the FDD capability information is identical to the TDD capability information. For example, if the FDD capability information (e.g., the FDD FGI set) differs from the TDD capability information (e.g., the TDD FGI set), the UE 405 reports the two sets to the eNB 410. If the FDD capability information (e.g., the FDD FGI set) is identical to the TDD capability information (e.g., the TDD FGI set), the UE 405 may not include an extension field. Therefore, if the eNB 410 receives capability information including one FGI set, it concludes that the received capability information can be applied to TDD and FDD.
The UE 405 transmits the UE capability information, including information generated at steps 530 or 535, to the eNB 410 at step 540.
The UE 405 can report the FGI sets and the other information. For example, the UE 405 may report information related to other capabilities that depend on whether an IOT test is performed or whether it can be supported (e.g., a feature indicating whether it can be supported via phyLayerParameters or interRAT-Parameters). The UE 405 may also report information related to the other capabilities, information regarding FDD, and information regarding TDD. During this process, the UE 405 includes capability information, supported in a mode of the current network, in a legacy related-field, and also capability information, supported in a mode other than the mode of the current network, in an extension field, and then reports them.
A conventional UE reports all frequency bands that it supports via rf-Parameters, and also reports a measurement gap requirement for respective frequency bands via measParameters.
In the second exemplary embodiment of the invention, the UE 405 determines information to be included in rf-Parameters and measParameters, considering a mode of a current serving network. If the UE 405 is connected to an FDD network, it reports FDD bands and the measurement gap requirement for the FDD bands, via a legacy field, e.g., rf-Parameters and measParameters. The UE 405 reports information regarding a mode, different from that of a current serving network, via an extension field (e.g., rf-Parameters and measParameters defined as a lower field of a UE-EUTRA-Capability-v11xy-IEs field).
As such, since a UE according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention operates in an FDD band and a TDD band separately, it can communicate with an eNB of the previous release without malfunction. That is, if an FDD band and a TDD band were reported to a legacy field but an FGI reports information regarding only one of the two bands, an eNB of the previous release may make a mistake in determining a feature group with respect to the mobility. For example, FGI 25 is related to inter-frequency for E-UTRA bands. Although the UE 405 has set FGI 25 of featureGroupIndicators of UE-EUTRA-Capability as a legacy related-field to ‘1’ in order to indicate that it has been subjected to an IOT for inter-frequency measurement with respect to the FDD bands, if the FDD bands and TDD bands are reported via rf-Parameters of the legacy related-field, the eNB of the previous release may mistakenly determine that the UE 405 has been subjected to an IOT for inter-frequency measurement with respect to all bands including FDD bands and TDD bands. Therefore, exemplary embodiments of the invention report bands with respect to modes.
Referring to
After transmitting an RRC CONNECTION SETUP COMPLETE message to the eNB 410, the UE 405 may execute corresponding functions at step 620. In order to acquire new UE capability information regarding the UE 405, the eNB 410 may transmit a UE capability enquiry message to the UE 405 as described above, referring to
When the UE 405 receives the message from the eNB 410 at step 620, it determines whether the mode of the current network is an FDD or TDD mode at step 625. That is, the UE 405 determines whether the operating band of the current cell is an FDD or TDD band. Alternatively, the UE 405 determines whether its current operating band is an FDD or TDD band. Since the current operating band of the UE 405 always matches the operating band of the current cell, the two determining processes are substantially identical to each other. Alternatively, the UE 405 may have previously determined the mode of the current network at step 605. That is, the UE 405 may execute the processes following step 525, based on the mode of the network at a time point that it needs to report the capability information.
If it is determined that the mode of the current network is an FDD mode at step 625, the UE 405 includes an FDD FGI set, FDD bands that it supports, a measurement gap requirement for the FDD bands, etc., in a legacy field (which can be understood by a conventional network), and also a TDD FGI set (i.e., information showing whether an IOT test has been performed in a TDD mode), TDD bands that it supports, a measurement gap requirement for the TDD bands, etc., in an extension field at step 630.
Table 5 describes an example of an IE that can be used at step 630.
Mobility-related bits of the FGI bits, e.g., FGI 8, 9, 10, 11, 25, etc., have different meanings according to positions where featureGroupIndicators are stored and according to information included in the stored rf-Parameters, as follows.
For example, if the UE 405 locates, in a legacy field, an rf-Parameter including an FDD band (or a TDD band at step 635) and an FGI related to an FDD (or TDD) mode, and also, in an extension field, an rf-Parameter including a TDD band (or an FDD band) and an FGI related to a TDD (or an FDD at step 635) mode,
Meanwhile, if it is determined that the mode of the current network is a TDD mode at step 625, the UE 405 includes a TDD FGI set (i.e., information showing whether an IOT test has been performed in a TDD mode), TDD bands that it supports, a measurement gap requirement for the TDD bands, etc., in a legacy field (which can be understood by a conventional network), and also an FDD FGI set (i.e., information showing whether an IOT test has been performed in an FDD mode), FDD bands that it supports, measurement gap requirement for the FDD bands, etc., in an extension field at step 635.
The UE 405 transmits the UE capability information, including information generated at steps 630 or 635, to the eNB 410 at step 640.
The third exemplary embodiment of the present invention provides a method for supporting features and FGI sets and indicating the requirement of an IOT test in respective duplex modes. UE-EUTRA-Capability includes an FGI bit, parameters related to bands that the UE supports (rf-Parameters), a parameter related to a peak data rate of the UE (ue-Category), parameters related to physical layer capability (phyLayerParameters), parameters related to other radio access technology (interRAT-Parameters), etc. In the third exemplary embodiment of the present invention, UE-EUTRA-Capability is managed as the following three examples.
The three capabilities described above may be identical to each other or differ from each other. If IOT environments for FDD and TDD may differ from each other or different types of features with respect to FDD and TDD are supported, the capabilities have different values respectively.
The UE 405 determines capability information to be reported, according to a mode of a network at a time point that it transmits UE capability information. For example, the UE 405 reports UE-EUTRA-Capability 1 and UE-EUTRA-Capability 3 via an FDD network and UE-EUTRA-Capability 2 and UE-EUTRA-Capability 3 via a TDD network.
Referring to
After transmitting the RRC CONNECTION SETUP COMPLETE message to the eNB 410, the UE 405 may execute corresponding functions at step 720. In order to acquire new UE capability information regarding the UE 405, the eNB 410 may transmit a UE capability enquiry message to the UE 405 as described above, referring to
When the UE 405 receives the message from the eNB 410 at step 720, it determines whether the mode of the current network is an FDD or TDD mode at step 725. That is, the UE 405 determines whether the operating band of the current cell is an FDD or TDD band. Alternatively, the UE 405 determines whether its current operating band is an FDD or TDD band. Since the current operating band of the UE 405 always matches the operating band of the current cell, the two determining processes are substantially identical to each other. Alternatively, the UE 405 may have previously determined the mode of the current network at step 705. That is, the UE 405 may execute the processes, based on the mode of the network at a time point that it needs to report the capability information.
If it is determined that the mode of the current network is an FDD mode at step 725, the UE 405 generates the UE capability information message at step 730. The UE capability information message includes, of the EUTRA-Capability-1, serving as capability information applicable to FDD, and EUTRA-Capability-2, serving as capability information applicable to TDD, UE-EUTRA-Capability-1, serving as capability information applicable to FDD corresponding to a mode of the current network, in a legacy field, and UE-EUTRA-Capability-3, serving as capability information applicable to FDD and TDD, in an extension field. If capability information applicable to one duplex mode (i.e., EUTRA-Capability-1 or EUTRA-Capability-2) differs from capability information commonly applicable to the two duplex modes (i.e., EUTRA-Capability-3), the UE 405 reports the information regarding the two capabilities. On the contrary, if capability information applicable to one duplex mode (i.e., EUTRA-Capability-1 or EUTRA-Capability-2) is identical to capability information commonly applicable to the two duplex modes (i.e., EUTRA-Capability-3), the UE 405 reports information regarding one of the two capabilities. Therefore, if the eNB 410 receives capability information including one FGI set, it concludes that the received capability information can be applied to both TDD and FDD.
On the contrary, if it is determined that the mode of the current network is a TDD mode at step 725, the UE 405 generates the UE capability information message at step 735. The UE capability information message includes, of the EUTRA-Capability-1, serving as capability information applicable to FDD, and EUTRA-Capability-2, serving as capability information applicable to TDD, UE-EUTRA-Capability-2, serving as capability information applicable to TDD corresponding to a mode of the current network, in a legacy field, and UE-EUTRA-Capability-3, serving as capability information applicable to FDD and TDD, in an extension field. If capability information applicable to one duplex mode (i.e., EUTRA-Capability-1 or EUTRA-Capability-2) differs from capability information commonly applicable to the two duplex modes (i.e., EUTRA-Capability-3), the UE 405 reports the information regarding the two capabilities. On the contrary, if capability information applicable to one duplex mode (i.e., EUTRA-Capability-1 or EUTRA-Capability-2) is identical to capability information commonly applicable to the two duplex modes (i.e., EUTRA-Capability-3), the UE 405 reports information regarding one of the two capabilities.
The UE 405 transmits the UE capability information, including information generated at steps 730 or 735, to the eNB 410 at step 740.
Referring to
The transceiver 805 receives data and control signals via the forward channel of a serving cell and transmits data and control signals via the reverse channel.
The multiplexer and demultiplexer 820 multiplexes data from the control message processor 835 or the upper layer devices 825 and 830 or de-multiplexes data from the transceiver 805, and transfers the processed data to the control message processor 835 or the upper layer devices 825 and 830.
The control message processor 835 refers to an RRC layer device. The control message processor 835 processes control messages transmitted from eNB 410 and performs corresponding operations. For example, the control message processor 835 receives an RRC control message, and transfers, if the RRC control message includes DRX-related information or SPS-related information, the included information to the controller 810. The control message processor 835 processes the control messages so that the UE 405 can report the capability information as described above referring to
The upper layer devices 825 and 830 may be configured according to types of services. For example, the upper layer devices 825 and 830 process data, generated when user services such as File Transfer Protocol (FTP) or Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services are provided, and transfer them to the multiplexer and demultiplexer 820. The upper layer devices 825 and 830 may also process data, from the multiplexer and demultiplexer 820, and transfer data to the upper layer service application.
The controller 810 receives a scheduling command via the transceiver 805, identifies the reverse grants, and controls the transceiver 805 and the multiplexer and demultiplexer 820 to transmit them as a proper transmission resource, in the reverse direction, at a proper time point. The controller 810 also sets up functions, referring to setting information transmitted from the control message processor 835. The controller 810 can control operations so that the UE 405 can report its capability information as described above referring to
Referring to
The transceiver 905 transmits data and control signals via the forward carriers and receives data and control signals via the reverse carriers.
The multiplexer and demultiplexer 920 multiplexes data from the control message processor 935 or the upper layer devices 925 and 930 or de-multiplexes data from the transceiver 905, and transfers the processed data to the control message processor 935, the upper layer devices 925 and 930, or the controller 910.
The control message processor 935 processes control messages from the UE 405 and performs corresponding operations. The control message processor 935 also generates control messages to be transmitted to the UE 405 and transfers them to the lower layer. The control message processor 935 generates a UE CAPABILITY ENQUIRY message to be transmitted to the UE 405, processes UE CAPABILITY INFORMATION transmitted from the UE 405, and determines a function to set the UE 405 based on the processed information. The control message processor 935 generates an RRC CONNECTION RECONFIGURATION message based on the determination and transfers it to the multiplexer and demultiplexer 920.
The upper layer devices 925 and 930 may be configured according to bearers. The upper layer devices 925 and 930 configure data, transmitted from S-GW 130 or the other eNB, to RLC PDU, and transfer it to the multiplexer-demultiplexer 920. The upper layer devices 925 and 930 configure RLC PDU, transmitted from the multiplexer-demultiplexer 920, to PDCP SDU, and transfer it to the S-GW 130 or the other eNB.
The scheduler 915 allocates transmission resources to the UE 405 at a proper time point, considering the buffer state, the channel state, etc. The scheduler 915 processes signals transmitted from or to the UE.
The controller 910 controls operations of the eNB 410 to receive UE capability information from the UE 405 according to one of the exemplary embodiments as described referring to
More particularly, the eNB 410 receives UE capability information, extracts information regarding a corresponding capability, considering the mode where the UE capability is reported, and accordingly communicates with the UE 405.
As described above, the system and method according to exemplary embodiments of the invention can allow a dual mode UE to efficiently report its capability information.
In addition, it should be understood that the exemplary processes and operations of the mobile device, described above, can be performed via computer programming instructions. These computer programming instructions can be installed in processors of data processing equipment that can be programmed, special computers, or universal (e.g., general purpose) computers. The instructions, performed via the processors of data processing equipment or the computers, can generate means that perform functions described in blocks of the flowchart. In order to implement functions in a particular mode, the computer programming instructions can also be stored in a computer available memory or computer readable memory that can support computers or data processing equipment that can be programmed. Therefore, the instructions, stored in the computer available memory or computer readable memory, can be installed to the products, and perform the functions therein, described in the blocks of the flowchart therein. In addition, since the computer programming instructions can also be installed to computers or data processing equipment that can be programmed, they can create processes that perform a series of operations therein, described in the blocks of the flowchart therein.
The blocks of the flowcharts refer to parts of codes, segments or modules that include one or more executable instructions to perform one or more logic functions. It should be noted that the functions described in the blocks of the flowcharts may be performed in a different order from the exemplary embodiments described above. For example, the functions described in two adjacent blocks may be performed at the same time or in reverse order.
In the exemplary embodiments, the terminology, component ‘˜unit,’ refers to a software element or a hardware element such as a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), etc., and performs a corresponding function. It should be, however, understood that the component ‘˜unit’ is not limited to a software or hardware element. The component ‘˜unit’ may be implemented in storage media that can be designated by addresses. The component ‘˜unit’ may also be configured to regenerate one or more processors. For example, the component ‘˜unit’ may include various types of elements (e.g., software elements, object-oriented software elements, class elements, task elements, etc.), segments (e.g., processes, functions, achieves, attribute, procedures, sub-routines, program codes, etc.), drivers, firmware, micro-codes, circuit, data, data base, data structures, tables, arrays, variables, etc. Functions provided by elements and the components ‘˜units’ may be formed by combining the small number of elements and components ‘˜units’ or may be divided into additional elements and components ‘˜units.’ In addition, elements and components ‘˜units’ may also be implemented to regenerate one or more CPUs in devices or security multi-cards.
The terms or words described in the description and the claims should not be limited by a general or lexical meaning, but instead should be analyzed as a meaning and a concept through which the inventor defines and describes the invention, to comply with the idea of the invention. Therefore, one skilled in the art will understand that the exemplary embodiments disclosed in the description and configurations illustrated in the drawings are only exemplary embodiments, and that there may be various modifications, alterations, and equivalents thereof to replace the exemplary embodiments at the time of filing this application.
While the invention has been shown and described with reference to certain exemplary embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims and their equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10-2012-0085793 | Aug 2012 | KR | national |
This application is a continuation application of prior application Ser. No. 16/121,160, filed on Sep. 4, 2018, which has issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,575,166 on Feb. 25, 2020 and was a continuation of prior application Ser. No. 14/878,652, filed on Oct. 8, 2015, which has issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,070,304 on Sep. 4, 2018 and was a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/571,735, filed on Aug. 10, 2012, which has issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,167,416 on Oct. 20, 2015, and which claimed the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/521,910, filed on Aug. 10, 2011, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/524,000, filed on Aug. 16, 2011, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/531,185, filed on Sep. 6, 2011, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/552,114, filed on Oct. 27, 2011, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/591,385, filed on Jan. 27, 2012, and under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a) of a Korean patent application filed on Aug. 6, 2012 in the Korean Intellectual Property Office and assigned Serial No. 10-2012-0085793, the entire disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6201972 | Hamabe | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6370390 | Salin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
7437178 | Jeong et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7899391 | Becker | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8203987 | Ishii et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8432843 | Cai et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8588745 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8638705 | Park et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8649288 | He et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8743896 | Wu | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8774818 | Lim et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8792417 | Yeoum et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8797989 | Lee | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8830828 | Guo et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8886184 | Cho et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8942630 | Lee et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9072025 | Jen et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9084074 | Jang et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9668177 | Grob-Lipski et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
20010034235 | Froula | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20040053623 | Hoff et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040131026 | Kim et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040180675 | Choi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203775 | Bourdeaut et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050041608 | Jeong et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050090278 | Jeong et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111393 | Jeong et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060023664 | Jeong et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060039309 | Lee et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058034 | Vaittinen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060221872 | Jones et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060281466 | Gholmieh et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070268877 | Buckley et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287419 | Wang | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080032662 | Tu | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080102749 | Becker | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130588 | Jeong et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080188219 | Fischer | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080225772 | Xu | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232310 | Xu | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240439 | Mukherjee et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273610 | Malladi et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298325 | Vujcic | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080318558 | Bouazizi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090034452 | Somasundaram et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090122740 | Bouazizi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090170498 | Venkatasubramanian et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177974 | Cox et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090221289 | Xu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090232054 | Wang et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090232118 | Wang et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090238098 | Cai et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090238105 | Wu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090238366 | Park et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090239525 | Cai et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090247218 | Lee et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090253470 | Xu | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259910 | Lee et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262681 | Park et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090285141 | Cai et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090316586 | Yi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316637 | Yi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316638 | Yi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323608 | Adachi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100041384 | Kazmi | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100093386 | Damnjanovic et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100110897 | Chun et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100111019 | Wu | May 2010 | A1 |
20100113010 | Tenny et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100118805 | Ishii et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100135159 | Chun et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100144361 | Gholmieh et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100172280 | Guo et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177831 | Kim et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100189038 | Chen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100210268 | Lim et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100240358 | Jen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246491 | Bae et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265867 | Becker et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100272003 | Lee | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100296467 | Pelletier et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100302988 | Becker | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100317356 | Roessel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110038277 | Hu et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110051609 | Ishii et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110103328 | Lee et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110108199 | Miller | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116433 | Dorenbosch | May 2011 | A1 |
20110164560 | Ki et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110170503 | Chun et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110171967 | Lee et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110183662 | Lee et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110194432 | Kato et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110194505 | Faccin et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110195668 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110201307 | Segura | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110222451 | Peisa et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110249641 | Kwon et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110250910 | Lee et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110256884 | Kazmi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110275365 | Fischer et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110294491 | Fong et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110299415 | He et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110312316 | Baldemair et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120008600 | Marinier et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120020231 | Chen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120040643 | Diachina et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120044898 | Ishii | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120051297 | Lee et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120092286 | O'Prey et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095846 | Leverant | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120108199 | Wang et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113831 | Pelletier et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113905 | Anderson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113948 | Kwon et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120176950 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120218922 | Klingenbrunn et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120236776 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120250520 | Chen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120257513 | Yamada | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120263039 | Ou et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120275390 | Korhonen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300714 | Ng et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300715 | Pelletier et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300752 | Kwon et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120307632 | Guo et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120307669 | Kim et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130010711 | Larsson et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130028185 | Wu | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130039250 | Hsu | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130040605 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130053103 | Kim et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130083739 | Yamada | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130089079 | Amirijoo et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130107778 | Ryu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130122906 | Klatt | May 2013 | A1 |
20130189978 | Lee et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130223311 | Wang et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130235780 | Kim et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130265866 | Yi et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130301421 | Yi et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130322302 | Gholmieh et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140080531 | Du et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140119255 | Vannithamby et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140128029 | Fong et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140171096 | Hwang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140185595 | Wu et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140211742 | Kim et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140242974 | Lee et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140369322 | Fwu et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150111520 | Hsu | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150189657 | Kim et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150271740 | Jang et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160014672 | Jang et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160014673 | Jang et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20170257156 | Ko et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1229562 | Sep 1999 | CN |
1524392 | Aug 2004 | CN |
1671240 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1738486 | Feb 2006 | CN |
1829380 | Sep 2006 | CN |
101120611 | Feb 2008 | CN |
101242608 | Aug 2008 | CN |
101370269 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101426256 | May 2009 | CN |
101553054 | Oct 2009 | CN |
101668250 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101682896 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101766010 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101772928 | Jul 2010 | CN |
101803234 | Aug 2010 | CN |
101808406 | Aug 2010 | CN |
101841830 | Sep 2010 | CN |
101841889 | Sep 2010 | CN |
101998432 | Mar 2011 | CN |
102025409 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102027798 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102098655 | Jun 2011 | CN |
102123520 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102124766 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102150454 | Aug 2011 | CN |
102170644 | Aug 2011 | CN |
0 946 071 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1 597 842 | Nov 2005 | EP |
2 104 256 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2265077 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2 280 576 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2 469 939 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2498566 | Sep 2012 | EP |
2 555 444 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2461780 | Jan 2010 | GB |
2013-135386 | Jul 2013 | JP |
10-2005-0015729 | Feb 2005 | KR |
10-2005-0020720 | Mar 2005 | KR |
10-2005-0032953 | Apr 2005 | KR |
10-2008-0031493 | Apr 2008 | KR |
10-2009-0019868 | Feb 2009 | KR |
10-2009-0039813 | Apr 2009 | KR |
10-2009-0086441 | Aug 2009 | KR |
10-2009-0104482 | Oct 2009 | KR |
10-2010-0017513 | Feb 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0051906 | May 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0105449 | Sep 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0105488 | Sep 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0106890 | Oct 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0108459 | Oct 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0116118 | Oct 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0126509 | Dec 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0133477 | Dec 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0137507 | Dec 2010 | KR |
10-2010-0137531 | Dec 2010 | KR |
10-2011-0000479 | Jan 2011 | KR |
10-2011-0081441 | Jul 2011 | KR |
10-2011-0084965 | Jul 2011 | KR |
10-2011-0085441 | Jul 2011 | KR |
10-2011-0088446 | Aug 2011 | KR |
10-2011-0091305 | Aug 2011 | KR |
10-2011-0093642 | Aug 2011 | KR |
10-2011-0095088 | Aug 2011 | KR |
10-2011-0109992 | Oct 2011 | KR |
10-2011-0134305 | Dec 2011 | KR |
10-2011-0135863 | Dec 2011 | KR |
2262811 | Oct 2005 | RU |
2411697 | Feb 2011 | RU |
2426251 | Aug 2011 | RU |
1998-001004 | Jan 1998 | WO |
1998-026625 | Jun 1998 | WO |
2008-106301 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008-137354 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2010-018801 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010063316 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010-121662 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2010-124228 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2010125969 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011007985 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011038625 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011-055999 | May 2011 | WO |
2011-085802 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011-093666 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011-099725 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011-133934 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011-154761 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2011-157292 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012-008691 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012108811 | Aug 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
3GPP TS 36.331 V9.0.0 (Sep. 2009); “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) Radio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol specification (Release 9)” pp. 76-77, 170-173 (Year: 2009). |
LG Electronics, “FGI bit for inter-frequency measurements and reporting V2”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 Meeting #74, Barcelona, Spain , Apr. 9-14, 2011, R2-113282 (Year: 2011). |
LG Electronics Inc, “FGI Bit 25”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 #74, Barcelona, Spain, May 9-14, 2011, R2-113277 (Year: 2011). |
3GPP TS 36.331 V10.2.0 (Jun. 2011), 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol specification (Release 10) (Year: 2011), pp. 94-95, 141-142, 230-237, 279-283. |
European Communication dated Nov. 14, 2019, issued in European Application No. 12839409.5. |
Indian Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2019, issued in Indian Application No. 3851/KOLNP/2013. |
Intel Corporation, “EAB for RAN overload protection”, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 Meeting #74, R2-113217, May 13, 2011. |
Chinese Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2019, issued in Chinese Application No. 201710210508.8. |
Clearwire, “E-UTRA capability handling for dual mode UEs (FDD/TDD)”, 3GPP TSG-RAN Meeting #54, Berlin Germany, Dec. 6-9, 2011, RP-111618 (Year: 2011). |
Samsung, “Discussion on FGI bit handling for FDD/TDD dual node U E”, 3GPP TSG-RAN2 #75 Meeting, Aug. 22-26, 2011, Athens, Greece, R2-114177 (Year: 2011). |
Vodafone, Extended ACB for UTRAN, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2#72 R2-106275, 3GPP, Nov. 9, 2010. |
Vodafone, Rejection of Connections towards a congested CN Node for UMTS and LTE, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG3#69bis R3-102964, 3GPP, Oct. 12, 2010. |
Itri, Handling of Roaming MTC Devices for CN overload control, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2#72bis R2-110399, 3GPP, Jan. 11, 2011. |
NEC, DOCOMO, NTC, Samsung, vSRVCC Enhancements in TS 24.301 excluding vSRVCC indicator (terminology variant 2), 3GPP TSG-CT WG1#72 C1-112670, 3GPP, Jul. 4, 2011. |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol specification (Release 11)”, 3GPP Standard; 3GPP TS 36.321, 3rd, Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France, vol. RAN WG2, No. V11.0.0, Sep. 21, 2012, pp. 1-55, XP050649832. |
3GPP TS 36.321 V10.1.0, 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol specification (Release 10), Mar. 2011. |
Ericsson et al., “Multiple frequency band indicators per cell”, 3GPP TSG-RAN2 Meeting #75, R2-114301, Aug. 26, 2011. |
Clearwire, E-UTRA capability handling for dual mode UEs (FDD/TDD), 3GPP TSG-RAN Meeting #54, Berlin Germany, Dec. 6-9, 2011, RP 111618. |
Clearwire, Capability handling for dual mode UEs (FDD/TDD), 3GPP TSG-RAN Working Group Meeting #75bis, Ahuhai, China, Oct. 10-14, 2011, R2-115468 with a publicly available date of Oct. 7, 2011. |
Samsung, “Report: [75#32] FGI bit handling for FDD/TDD dual mode UE”, 3GPP TSG-RAN2 #75bis meeting, Oct. 10-14, 2011, Zhuhai, China, Tdoc R2-11503. |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception (Release 10)”, 3GPP Standard; 3GPP TS 36.101, No. V10.3.0, 21 Jun. 6, 2011, pp. 1-237, XP050553331. |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA) and Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio measurement collection for Minimization of Drive Tests (MDT); Overall description; Stage 2 (Release 10)”, 3GPP TS 37.320 V10.3.0; Oct. 2, 2011. |
LG Electronics Inc,“MDT coverage optimization enhancement for HetNet”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 #75bis, R2-115451; Oct. 4, 2011. |
Research in Motion Ltd: “Go to Long Sleep Command for L TE DRX”, 3GPP Draft; R2-081868, 3rd 3ENERATION Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre ; 650, Route Des Lucioles ; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex ; FR. |
LTE: “E-UTRA; MAC Protocol Specification (3GPP TS 36.321 Version 10.2.0 Release 10)”, ETSI TS 136 321 V10.2.0., pp. 34-35,41-44, XP055319954; Jun. 28, 2011. |
European Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2018; Application #: 18186199.8-1218. |
Korean Office Action dated Sep. 3, 2018; Application #: 10-2014-7010287. |
Korean Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2018; Application #: 10-2014-7012797. |
3GPP, TS36.331 v10.4.0, 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio Resource Control (RRC); protocol specification (Release 10), Dec. 21, 2011. |
LG Electronics Inc., R2-114456, EAB model in UE, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #75, Aug. 16, 2011. |
Korean Decision of Patent dated Dec. 12, 2018, issued in Korean Application No. 10-2012-0037390. |
Korean Decision of Patent dated Dec. 12, 2018, issued in Korean Application No. 10-2012-0087815. |
Korean Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2019, issued in Korean Application No. 10-2013-0002455. |
Korean Decision of Patent dated Jan. 15, 2019, issued in Korean Application No. 10-2012-0089549. |
Korean Decision of Patent dated Jan. 16, 2019, issued in Korean Application No. 10-2012-0086312. |
Canadian Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2019, issued in Canadian Application No. 2,844,603. |
Korean Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2019, issued in Korean Application No. 10-2014-7027400. |
3GPP, 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol specification (Release 10) 3GPP TS 36.331 V10.3.0, Sep. 2011. |
Intel Corporation, R2-113215, Configuration of multiple TA in Rel-11 CA, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #74, 3GPP, May 3, 2011. |
InterDigital Communications, R2-113255, Support for multiple Timing Advance in LTE CA, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #74, 3GPP, May 3, 2011. |
Korean Decision of Patent dated Mar. 4, 2019, issued in Korean Application No. 10-2014-7010287. |
Korean Decision of Patent dated Apr. 10, 2019, issued in Korean Application No. 10-2012-0112390. |
Korean Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2019, issued in Korean Application No. 10-2012-0087760. |
Huawei et al., R2-113285, Discussion on TA group management, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #74, 3GPP, May 3, 2011. |
LG Electronics Inc. et al., R2-113282, Capability indication of handover support between LTE FDD and LTE TDD, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #74, Apr. 9-14, 2011, Barcelona, Spain. |
Nokia Corporation et al., R2-106934, UE capability signaling for CA and MIMO in REL10, 3GPP TSG RAN, WG2 #72, Nov. 15-19, 2010, Jacksonville, U.S.A. |
HTC Corporation et al., R2-100769, Correction to field descriptions of UE-EUTRA-Capability, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #68bis, Jan. 18-22, 2010, Valencia, Spain. |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Service accessibility (Release 10)”, 3GPP Draft; 3GPP TS 22.011 V10.3.0 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Anti Polis Cedex, Mar. 2011, Vaibonne, France. |
Ericsson et al., R2-114033, CSI and SRS reporting at unexpected DRX state change, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #75, Aug. 22-26, 2011, Athens, Greece. |
Nokia Siemens Networks et al., R2-114021, Clarification on CQI/SRS reporting during DRX, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #75, Aug. 22-26, 2011, Athens, Greece. |
Korean Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2019, issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2019-0068946. |
European Search Report dated Jul. 3, 2019, issued in European Patent Application No. 19165270.0. |
Ndian Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2019, issued in Indian Patent Application No. 62/KOLNP/2014. |
Korean Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2019, issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-0113330. |
Ericsson et al., R2-105210, Introduction of relays in MAC, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #71, Aug. 23-27, 2010. |
Texas Instruments, R1-100745, Increasing Sounding Capacity for LTE-A, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #59bis, Jan. 21, 2010. |
Panasonic, “Clarification on IDC problem resolution indication”, R2-123373, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #79, Qingdao, China, Aug. 13-17, 2012. |
Korean Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2019, issued in Korean Application No. 10-2012-0087760. |
Rapporteur (Ericsson) et al., R2-115078, UE soft buffer handling in MAC, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #75bis, Oct. 4, 2011. |
Huawei, HiSilicon, “EAB parameters in shared network”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #76, R2-115830, Nov. 8, 2011. |
Mediatek, “Further details on EAB”, 3GPP TSG-RAN2 #76, R2-116094, Nov. 8, 2011. |
ZTE, Panasonic, SierraWireless “Clarification on how EAB is applied in Shared Network”, 3GPP TSG-SA WG1 Meeting #54, S1-111310, May 13, 2011. |
Ericsson, R2-080934, Details of MAC DRX Control, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #61, Feb. 4, 2008. |
Qualcomm Incorporated, “Assistance Information for MBMS UEs in RRC_IDLE mode”, 3GPP Draft, R2-115104, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles, F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex, France, vol. RAN WG2, Zhuhai, Oct. 10, 2011, pp. 1-3, XP050540796, Oct. 3, 2011. |
Huawei et al., “How does the UE determine whether neighbour cells of MBMS frequency can provide the services that it is interested to receive”, 3GPP Draft, R2-114430, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des, vol. RAN WG2, Athens, Greece, Aug. 22, 2011, pp. 1/4-4/4, XP050552786, Aug. 16, 2011. |
Huawei, “[75#35]—LTE: MBMS Service Continuity”, 3GPP Draft, R2-115017, Summary of Email Discussion 75#35 LTE—MBMS Service Continuity, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles, F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex, France, vol. RAN WG2, Zhuhai, Oct. 10, 2011, pp. 1-20, XP050540930, Oct. 4, 2011. |
Randy H. Katz, “Adaptation and Mobility in Wireless Information Systems”, IEEE Personal Communications, (1994), XP011415559, 1994. |
Korean Notification of a Decision to Grant dated Feb. 26, 2020, issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-0087076. |
Korean Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2020, issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-0113330. |
Chinese Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2020, issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201711026422.6. |
Chinese Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2020, issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201710709108.1. |
Korean Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2020, issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-0087760. |
Brazilian Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2020, issued in Brazilian Patent Application No. BR112014008713-0. |
Brazilian Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2020, issued in Brazilian Application No. 112014004199-7. |
Qualcomm Incorporated, Separate UE capability for FDD and TDD, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #74, R2-113059, May 9-13, 2011. |
Qualcomm Incorporated, UE capability for FDD and TDD, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #73bis, R2-111868, Apr. 11-15, 2011. |
Qualcomm Incorporated, Introduction of UE capability for handover between FDD and TDD, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2#74, R2-113056, May 9-13, 2011. |
Samsung; Discussion on FGI bit handling for FDD/TDD dual mode UE; 3GPP TSG-RAN2 #75 meeting, Aug. 22-26, 2011 (electronically published Aug. 16, 2011). |
3GPP; 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol specification (Release 10); 3GPP TS 36.331; V10.2.0; Jun. 24, 2011. |
LG Electronics Inc; FGI Bit 25; 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 #74; R2-113277; Barcelona, Spain; May 9-14, 2011. |
3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 #75, R2-114299, Multiple frequency band indicators per cell; Athens, Greece; Aug. 16, 2011. |
R4-114382 TR 37.806 v1.1.0 change bars; Volbonne, France; Aug. 17, 2011. |
Nokia Corporation et al.: “RACH and carrier aggregation”, 3GPP Draft; R2-096844 RACH and Carrier Aggregation; Nov. 9, 2009; Jeju, South Korea. |
Samsung, 3GPP TSG-RAN2 #70 bis meeting Tdoc R2-103802; Jul. 2, 2010; Stockholm, Sweden. |
ITRI: “Considerations on Random Access on SCell”, 3GPP Draft: R2-113192 Considerations on Random Access on SCELL V3. 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), XP050495362; May 3, 2011 Barcelon, Spain. |
Asustek: “Issues of Random Access procedure on SCell”, 3GPP Draft; R2-112922 Issues of Random Access Procedure on SCELL, 3rd Generation Partership Project(3GPP), XP050495298; May 3, 2011; Barcelona, Spain. |
ZTE, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #74 R2-113388; May 13, 2011; Barcelona, Spain. |
3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #75 R2-113988, General consideration of EAB in LTE, Huawei; Aug. 26, 2011 Athens, Greece. |
3GPP TS 22.011 v11.2.0, Service accessibility; Dec. 31, 2011; Valbonne, France. |
New Postcom: “Consideration on RA response window size for SCell”, 3GPP Draft: R2-123485 Consideration on RA Response Window Size for SCELL, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), XP050665586; Aug. 7, 2012, Qingdao, China. |
3GPP TS 26.346 v10.0.0; Valbonne, France; Mar. 2011. |
Qualcommm Incorprated, Verizon Wireless, “System time and leap seconds”, 3GPP TSG-CT WG1 #79 C1-122988 Chicago, US; Jul. 30, 2012. |
Qualcomm Incorporated, “MBMS Assistance Information for idle and connected mode”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2#77 R2-120285; Dresden, Germany; Jan. 31, 2012. |
Qualcomm Incorporated, Verizon Wireless, Telefon AB LM Ericsson, ST-Ericsson SA, Alcatel-Lucent, “USD Signaling of Frequency Information”, 3GPP TSG-SA WG4#69 S4-120602; Erlagen, Germany; May 21, 2012. |
Verizon Wireless, Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, ST-Ericsson, Motorola Mobility, Qualcomm Incorporated, “MBMS Multibands Cell Selection and Reselection”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2#77 R2-120841; Dresden, DE; Feb. 6, 2012. |
Samsung, “Introducing MBMS enhancements for REL-11”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2#79 R2-123859; Qingdao, PR of China; Aug. 12, 2012. |
“LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) and Evolved Packet Core (EPC); Common test environments for User Equipment (UE) conformance testing (3GPP TS 36.508 version 9.5.0 Release 9)”, Technical Specification, European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), 650, XP014066447 Cedex, France; Jul. 2011. |
Panasonic et al.: “CQI/ SRS/ PMI/ RI Transmission during active time”, 3GPP Draft; R2-086318, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France, no. Prague, Czech Republic, XP050321306; Prague, Czech Repbulic; Nov. 10, 2008. |
Samsung: “Discussion on CQI/ SRS Transmission during DRX”, 3GPP Draft; R2-114180 Continuing CQI Temporary, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France, vol. RAN WG2, no. Athens, Greece, XP050539989; Athens, Greece; Aug. 22, 2011. |
Ericsson, ST-Ericsson, Extended access barring for MTC devices[online], 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2#74 R2-113030; Barcelona, Spain; May 9, 2011. |
LG Electronics Inc., Further Discussion on EAB[online], 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2#74 R2-113339; Barcelona, Spain; May 9, 2011. |
3GPP TS 22.011 V11.0.0; Valbonne, France; Jun. 2011. |
Intel Corporation, Additional requirements on EAB for RAN overload protection[online], 3GPP TSG-SA WG1#54 S1-111152; Xi'an, China; May 9, 2011. |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Service accessibility (Release 10)”, XP050914344; Valbonne, France; Mar. 2011. |
InterDigital Communications, Handling of SCell Activation/Deactivation RF Retuning Interruptions, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #78, R2-122289, May 21-25, 2012, Prague, Czech Republic. |
Renesas Mobile Europe Ltd, Considerations on retuning interruptions, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting #63, R4-123056, May 21-25, 2012, Prague, Czech Republic. |
Juniper, “Overview of PDP contexts and Bearers”, Nov. 16, 2011, retrived at http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/unosmobility11.2/topics/concept/gateways-mobility-bearer-overview.html. |
Telcoloewe, “PDP context vs. EPS Bearer”, Jan. 28, 2010. https://telcoloewe.wordpress.com/2010/01/28/pdp-context-vs-epsbearer/https://telcoloewe.wordpress.com/2010/01/28/pdp-context-vs-eps-bearer/. |
Huawei et al., “Enabling SMS for PS-only”, SA WG2 Meeting #87, S2-114586, Oct. 10-14, 2011, pp. 1-2, Jeju, Korea. |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Circuit Switched (CS) fallback in Evolved Packet System (EPS); Stage 2 (Release 10)”, 3GPP TS 23.272 V110.5.0 (Sep. 2011), Aug. 24, 2011, pp. 1-79. |
Alcatel-Lucent et al., “RA procedure on SCell”, TSG-RAN WG2#77, R2-120603, Feb. 6-10, 2012, pp. 1-5, Dresden, Germany. |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Study on Minimization of drive-tests in Next Generation Networks; (Release 9)”, 3GPP TR 36 805 V9.00 (Dec. 2009), Jan. 5, 2010, pp. 2-27. |
Ericsson et al., “Accessibility measurements for MDT”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 #76, R2-116148, Oct. 14-18, 2011, pp. 2-4, San Francisco, CA, USA. |
Alcatel-Lucent, “VLR SGs paging retry”, SA WG2 Meeting #87, S2-114636 (revision of S2-114578), Oct. 10-14, 2011, pp. 2-6, Jeju, South Korea. |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Service accessibility; (Release 11)”, 3GPP TS 22.011 V11.2.0 (Dec. 2011), Dec. 31, 2011, pp. 1-26. |
Pantech, “IDC trigger procedure”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #77, R2-120664, Nov. 14-18, 2011, pp. 1-5, Dresden, Germany. |
Motorola, “Solution for Extra Low Power Consumption & Time Controlled”, 3GPP TSG SA WG2 Meeting #78, TD S2-101215, Feb. 22-26, 2010, pp. 1-3, San Francisco, USA. |
23.1 RRC Connection Establishment, www.lte-bullets.com, Aug. 12, 2011. |
Huawei et al., “The MDT applicability of EPLMN”, 3GPP Change Request, 3GPP TSG-WG2 Meeting #75, R2-114011, Aug. 22-26, 2011, Athens, Greece. |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA) and Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio measurement collection for Minimization of Drive Tests (MDT); Overall description; Stage 2 (Release 10)”, 3GPP TS 37.320, V10.4.0, Dec. 2011. |
CATT, Corrections and Clarifications on UTRA related FGIs, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2#77bis, R2-121551, Mar. 19, 2012. |
CATT, Corrections and Clarifications on UTRA related FGIs, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2#77bis, R2-121549, Mar. 19, 2012. |
CATT, Analysis on FGIs for 3/4-mode UE, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2#77bis, R2-121173, Mar. 19, 2012. |
Interdigital: “RACH with Carrier Aggregation”, 3GPP Draft; R2-102132 (RACH in CA), 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650 , Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France, vol. RAN WG2, no. Beijing , china; Apr. 12, 2010, Apr. 6, 2010, XP050422566. |
3GPP, TS36.321 v10.1.0, “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol specification”, Apr. 5, 2011. |
Ericsson, ST-Ericsson, “UE soft buffer handling in MAC”, 3GPP TSG-RAN2 WG2 Meeting #75, R2-114568, Aug. 23, 2011. |
Nokia Siemens Networks, Nokia Corporation, “HARQ comparison for soft buffer handling”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #75bis, R2-114940, Oct. 10, 2011. |
Korean Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 29, 2020, issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2019-0037950. |
Korean Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2020, issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-0087760. |
Korean Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 31, 2020, issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-0113330. |
New Postcom, “Clarification on the indication for In-device Coexistence”, 3GPP Draft; R2-112094, Clarification on the Indication for In-Device Co-Xistence, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophiaantipolis Cedex; France, vol. RAN WG2, Shanghai, China, Apr. 11, 2011, Apr. 3, 2011, XP050494240. |
Pantech, “RLF handling due to IDC”, 3GPP Draft; R2-112909, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Anti Polis Cedex France, vol. RAN WG2, Barcelona, Spain, May 9, 2011, May 3, 2011, XP050495294. |
Intel Corporation, “Enhancements in DRX operation”, 3GPP Draft; R2-124974_TEI11_DRX-Final, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France vol. RAN WG2, Bratislava, Slovakia, Oct. 8, 2012-Oct. 12, 2012, Sep. 28, 2012, XP050666517, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG2_RL2/TSGR2_79bis/Docs/ [retrieved on Sep. 28, 2012]. |
Ericsson et al., “CSI and SRS reporting at unexpected DRX state change”, 3GPP Draft; R2-115438, CSI and SRS Reporting at Unexpected DRX State Change, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex France, vol. RAN WG2, Zhuhai, Oct. 10, 2011, Oct. 3, 2011, XP050540889, [retrieved on Oct. 3, 2011]. |
Samsung, “Discussion on mandating CSI/SRS transmission during uncertain period”, 3GPP Draft; R2-124687, Mandating CSLSRS for 4 Subframes, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route Des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France vol. RAN NG2, Bratislava, Slovakia, Oct. 8, 2012-Oct. 12, 2012, Sep. 28, 2012, XP050666412, Retrieved from the Internet URL:http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG2_RL2/TSGR2_79bis/Docs/ [retrieved on Sep. 28, 2012]. |
European Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2021, issued in European Patent Application No. 12839409.5. |
European Summons to attend oral proceedings dated May 4, 2021, issued in European Patent Application No. 12839782.5. |
3GPP, 3GPP TS 36.321 V9.3.0 (Jun. 2010), 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol specification (Release 9), Jun. 2010. |
ITRI: “Further analysis on RAN overload control mechanisms”,3GPP Draft; R2-112197_Further Analysis on RAN Overload Control Mechanisms, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre ; 650, Route Des Lucioles ; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France, vol. RAN WG2, No. XP050494576; Apr. 5, 2011, Shanghai, China. |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Multiplexing and channel coding (Release 10)”, 3GPP Standard; 3GPP TS 36.212, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre ; 650, Route Des Lucioles ; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex ; France, vol. RAN WG1, No. V10.2.0, XP050553365, Jun. 21, 2011, pp. 1-78. |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical layer procedures (Release 10)”, 3GPP Standard; 3GPP TS 36.213, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre ; 650, Route Des Lucioles ; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex ; France, vol. RAN WG1, No. V10.3.0, XP050553950, Sep. 25, 2011, pp. 1-122. |
Notice of allowance dated Aug. 30, 2021, issued by a counterpart European Application No. 19 193 176.5-1231. |
European Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2021, issued by a counterpart European Application No. 12 839 782.5. |
3GPP TS 36.321 V10.3.0, 3rd Generation Partnership Project, Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network, Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA), Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol specification, (Release 10). |
European Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 15, 2022, issued in Korean Patent Application No. 12 839 782.5-1212. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200196132 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61591385 | Jan 2012 | US | |
61552114 | Oct 2011 | US | |
61531185 | Sep 2011 | US | |
61524000 | Aug 2011 | US | |
61521910 | Aug 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16121160 | Sep 2018 | US |
Child | 16800663 | US | |
Parent | 14878652 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 16121160 | US | |
Parent | 13571735 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 14878652 | US |