Cells within a tissue of a subject have differences in cell morphology and/or function due to varied analyte levels (e.g., gene and/or protein expression) within the different cells. The specific position of a cell within a tissue (e.g., the cell's position relative to neighboring cells or the cell's position relative to the tissue microenvironment) can affect, e.g., the cell's morphology, differentiation, fate, viability, proliferation, behavior, and signaling and cross-talk with other cells in the tissue.
Spatial heterogeneity has been previously studied using techniques that only provide data for a small handful of analytes in the context of an intact tissue or a portion of a tissue, or provide a lot of analyte data for single cells, but fail to provide information regarding the position of the single cell in a parent biological sample (e.g., tissue sample).
An array may be used to process a biological sample (e.g., tissue sample) for various purposes, such as identification or characterization of an analyte within the biological sample. However, incorrectly placing tissue sample within the capture area and/or placing damaged/folded tissue on the array have been proven to be a common issue when using arrays to study spatial organization of gene expression.
Provided herein are methods of resetting an array, allowing removal of tissue from the array and reprocessing new tissue onto the array without seeing a significant decrease in sequencing metrics.
In one aspect, provided herein is a method for resetting an array, the method including: (a) applying a biological sample to an array wherein the array includes a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality of capture probes includes a capture domain that binds specifically to an analyte from the biological sample, (b) identifying that the biological sample has been applied to the array incorrectly or does not contain a region of interest, and (c) treating the array with a set of biological sample removal conditions, such that the biological sample is substantially removed from the array, wherein no reverse transcription has been performed prior to step (c), thereby resetting the array.
In another aspect, provided herein is a method for resetting an array to which a biological sample has been applied, the method including: (a) identifying that the biological sample has been applied to the array incorrectly or does not contain a region of interest, and (b) treating the array with a set of biological sample removal conditions, such that the biological sample is substantially removed from the array, wherein no reverse transcription has been performed on the array, wherein the array includes a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality of capture probes includes a capture domain that binds specifically to an analyte from the biological sample, thereby resetting the array.
In some embodiments, identifying that the biological sample has been applied to the array incorrectly can include identifying that one or more fiducial markers on the array is obscured by the biological sample. In some embodiments, identifying that the biological sample has been applied to the array incorrectly can include identifying that the biological sample is folded. In some embodiments, identifying that the biological sample has been applied to the array incorrectly can include identifying that the biological sample is torn or damaged. In some embodiments, identifying that the biological sample has been applied to the array incorrectly comprises identifying that the biological sample overlaps with a second biological sample. In some embodiments, identifying that the biological sample does not contain the region of interest can include imaging the biological sample after staining and/or immunofluorescence. In some embodiments, an image produced by imaging the biological sample demonstrates an incorrect application of a stain and/or an immunofluorescence antibody. In some embodiments, an image produced by imaging the biological sample demonstrates nonspecific staining of the biological sample.
Also provided herein is a method for resetting an array to which a biological sample has been applied, the method including: treating the array with a set of biological sample removal conditions, such that the biological sample is substantially removed from the array, wherein no reverse transcription has been performed on the array, wherein the array includes a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality of capture probes includes a capture domain that binds specifically to an analyte from the biological sample, thereby resetting the array.
Provided additionally herein is a method for resetting an array, the method including: (a) applying a biological sample to an array wherein the array includes a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality of capture probes includes a capture domain that binds specifically to an analyte from the biological sample, and (b) treating the array with a set of biological sample removal conditions, such that the biological sample is substantially removed from the array, wherein no reverse transcription has been performed prior to step (b), thereby resetting the array.
In some embodiments, the array can be a tissue optimization array. In some embodiments, treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions can include treating the array with a base. In some embodiments, the base can include a base selected from the group consisting of potassium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide. In some embodiments, treating the array with the base can include treating the array with about 40 mM to about 120 mM of the base. In some embodiments, treating the array with the base can include treating the array with about 75 mM to about 85 mM of the base. In some embodiments, treating the array with the base can include treating the array with the base for between about 1 minute and about 20 minutes. In some embodiments, treating the array with the base includes treating the array with the base for about 8 minutes to about 12 minutes. In some embodiments, treating the array with a base can include treating the array with a base for one, two, three, four or five cycles.
In some embodiments, treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions further can include washing the array with water one or more times. In some embodiments, the water can be nuclease-free water and/or ultrapure water.
In some embodiments, treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions further can include washing the array with a buffer one or more times. In some embodiments, the buffer can be selected from the group consisting of Tris, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid), TES (2-[(2-Hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl)amino]ethanesulfonic acid), and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the buffer can have a concentration of about 1 mM to about 20 mM. In some embodiments, the buffer can have a concentration of about 8 mM to about 12 mM. In some embodiments, the buffer can have a pH of about 6.0 to about 8.0. In some embodiments, the buffer can have a pH of about 6.5 to about 7.5. In some embodiments, the buffer can have a pH of about 6.8 to about 7.2.
In some embodiments, treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions can further include drying the array.
In some embodiments treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions, the biological sample is not permeabilized.
In some embodiments, treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions can include, sequentially, treating the array with the base, washing the array with the buffer, washing the array with water, and optionally drying the array.
In some embodiments, treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions further can include treating the array with a proteinase. In some embodiments, treating the array with the proteinase precedes treating with the base. In some embodiments, the proteinase can be proteinase K. In some embodiments, treating the array with the proteinase can be for between 10 minutes and 2 hours. In some embodiments, treating the array with the proteinase can be for between 30 minutes and 90 minutes. In some embodiments, treating the array with the proteinase can be for about 55 minutes to about 65 minutes. In some embodiments, during treatment of the array with the proteinase, the biological sample can be incubated at between 40 degrees and 60 degrees Celsius. In some embodiments, during treatment of the array with proteinase, the biological sample can be incubated at between 45 degrees to about 55 degrees Celsius. In some embodiments, treating the array with the proteinase further can include treating the array with a surfactant and a proteinase buffer. In some embodiments, the surfactant can be sodium dodecyl sulfate. In some embodiments, the surfactant can be present in an amount of about 5% w/v to about 20% w/v. In some embodiments, the surfactant can be present in an amount of about 8% w/v to about 10% w/v. In some embodiments, the proteinase buffer can be Tris. In some embodiments, the proteinase buffer can have a concentration of about 1 mM to about 20 mM. In some embodiments, the proteinase buffer can have a concentration of about 8 mM to about 12 mM. In some embodiments, the proteinase buffer can have a pH of about 8.0 to about 10.0. In some embodiments, the proteinase buffer can have a pH of about 8.5 to about 9.5. In some embodiments, the proteinase buffer can have a pH of about 8.8 to about 9.2.
In some embodiments, treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions can include, sequentially, treating the array with the proteinease, washing the array with water, treating the array with the base, washing the array with the buffer, washing the array with water, and optionally drying.
In some embodiments, the array can include a slide. In some embodiments, the slide can be a glass slide.
In some embodiments, the biological sample can be an animal sample. In some embodiments, the biological sample can be a human sample. In some embodiments, the biological sample can be a rodent sample. In some embodiments, the biological sample can be a breast, brain, heart, small intestine, eye, testes, or kidney sample. In some embodiments, biological sample can be a cancerous sample or a sample suspected of having cancerous cells. In some embodiments, the biological sample can be a tissue section. In some embodiments, the tissue section can be a fresh frozen tissue section. In some embodiments, the biological sample can be fixed. In some embodiments, the biological sample can be formalin-fixed. In some embodiments, the biological sample can be fixed using methanol. In some embodiments, the biological sample can be fixed using acetone. In some embodiments, the biological sample can be stained. In some embodiments, the stain can be a histological stain. In some embodiments, the histological stain can be a hematoxylin and eosin stain. In some embodiments, the biological sample can be imaged using immunofluorescence.
Also provided herein is a method for capturing an analyte using an array, the method including: (a) resetting an array according to any one or more of the methods described herein, wherein the array is a spatial array and the capture probe further includes a spatial barcode, (b) contacting the spatial array with a biological sample, and (c) capturing an analyte from the biological sample on the spatial array. In some embodiments, the analyte can include RNA, DNA, a protein, a small molecule, or a metabolite. In some embodiments, the method can further include determining (i) all or a portion of a sequence corresponding to the spatial barcode, or a complement thereof, and (ii) all or a portion of a sequence corresponding to the analyte, or a complement thereof.
Also provided herein is a method for analyzing capture of a plurality of analytes on a tissue optimization array, the method including (a) resetting a tissue optimization array according to any of the tissue optimization resetting methods described herein, (b) contacting the tissue optimization array with a biological sample, (c) capturing a plurality of analytes from the biological sample on the tissue optimization array, and (d) analyzing the amount, distribution, and/or diffusion of the plurality of analytes based on the analytes from the biological sample captured on the tissue optimization array. In some embodiments, the plurality of analytes includes RNA, DNA, a protein, a small molecule, a metabolite, or a combination thereof. All publications, patents, patent applications, and information available on the internet and mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, patent application, or item of information was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference. To the extent publications, patents, patent applications, and items of information incorporated by reference contradict the disclosure contained in the specification, the specification is intended to supersede and/or take precedence over any such contradictory material.
Where values are described in terms of ranges, it should be understood that the description includes the disclosure of all possible sub-ranges within such ranges, as well as specific numerical values that fall within such ranges irrespective of whether a specific numerical value or specific sub-range is expressly stated.
The term “each,” when used in reference to a collection of items, is intended to identify an individual item in the collection but does not necessarily refer to every item in the collection, unless expressly stated otherwise, or unless the context of the usage clearly indicates otherwise.
Various embodiments of the features of this disclosure are described herein. However, it should be understood that such embodiments are provided merely by way of example, and numerous variations, changes, and substitutions can occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of this disclosure. It should also be understood that various alternatives to the specific embodiments described herein are also within the scope of this disclosure.
The following drawings illustrate certain embodiments of the features and advantages of this disclosure. These embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the appended claims in any manner. Like reference symbols in the drawings indicate like elements.
Placing a biological sample such as a tissue sample on a location on an array can be challenging. For example, tissue sections which are often around 5-10 μm thick can be difficult to handle. Tissue sections can fold back on themselves, they can tear or be damaged such that proceding with spatial assays to determine analyte locations within a tissue are compromised. In some cases, after imaging, a tissue sample can be determined not to contain a region of interest (e.g., tumor region or immune cell infiltrate). It would be very beneficial if, once placed on an array, a tissue sample could be removed, repositioned or altogether replaced with another tissue sample without compromising the downstream analysis (e.g., spatial assay). The present disclosure provides methods for repositioning, removing, replacing, or resetting a tissue sample on an array.
Spatial analysis methodologies and compositions described herein can provide a vast amount of analyte and/or expression data for a variety of analytes within a biological sample at high spatial resolution, while retaining native spatial context. Spatial analysis methods and compositions can include, e.g., the use of a capture probe including a spatial barcode (e.g., a nucleic acid sequence that provides information as to the location or position of an analyte within a cell or a tissue sample (e.g., mammalian cell or a mammalian tissue sample) and a capture domain that is capable of binding to an analyte (e.g., a protein and/or a nucleic acid) produced by and/or present in a cell. Spatial analysis methods and compositions can also include the use of a capture probe having a capture domain that captures an intermediate agent for indirect detection of an analyte. For example, the intermediate agent can include a nucleic acid sequence (e.g., a barcode) associated with the intermediate agent. Detection of the intermediate agent is therefore indicative of the analyte in the cell or tissue sample.
Non-limiting aspects of spatial analysis methodologies and compositions are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 10,774,374, 10,724,078, 10,480,022, 10,059,990, 10,041,949, 10,002,316, 9,879,313, 9,783,841, 9,727,810, 9,593,365, 8,951,726, 8,604,182, 7,709,198, U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2020/239946, 2020/080136, 2020/0277663, 2020/024641, 2019/330617, 2019/264268, 2020/256867, 2020/224244, 2019/194709, 2019/161796, 2019/085383, 2019/055594, 2018/216161, 2018/051322, 2018/0245142, 2017/241911, 2017/089811, 2017/067096, 2017/029875, 2017/0016053, 2016/108458, 2015/000854, 2013/171621, WO 2018/091676, WO 2020/176788, Rodrigues et al., Science 363(6434):1463-1467, 2019; Lee et al., Nat. Protoc. 10(3):442-458, 2015; Trejo et al., PLoS ONE 14(2):e0212031, 2019; Chen et al., Science 348(6233):aaa6090, 2015; Gao et al., BMC Biol. 15:50, 2017; and Gupta et al., Nature Biotechnol. 36:1197-1202, 2018; the Visium Spatial Gene Expression Reagent Kits User Guide (e.g., Rev C, dated June 2020), and/or the Visium Spatial Tissue Optimization Reagent Kits User Guide (e.g., Rev C, dated July 2020), both of which are available at the 10× Genomics Support Documentation website, and can be used herein in any combination. Further non-limiting aspects of spatial analysis methodologies and compositions are described herein.
Some general terminology that may be used in this disclosure can be found in Section (I)(b) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. Typically, a “barcode” is a label, or identifier, that conveys or is capable of conveying information (e.g., information about an analyte in a sample, a bead, and/or a capture probe). A barcode can be part of an analyte, or independent of an analyte. A barcode can be attached to an analyte. A particular barcode can be unique relative to other barcodes. For the purpose of this disclosure, an “analyte” can include any biological substance, structure, moiety, or component to be analyzed. The term “target” can similarly refer to an analyte of interest.
Analytes can be broadly classified into one of two groups: nucleic acid analytes, and non-nucleic acid analytes. Examples of non-nucleic acid analytes include, but are not limited to, lipids, carbohydrates, peptides, proteins, glycoproteins (N-linked or O-linked), lipoproteins, phosphoproteins, specific phosphorylated or acetylated variants of proteins, amidation variants of proteins, hydroxylation variants of proteins, methylation variants of proteins, ubiquitylation variants of proteins, sulfation variants of proteins, viral proteins (e.g., viral capsid, viral envelope, viral coat, viral accessory, viral glycoproteins, viral spike, etc.), extracellular and intracellular proteins, antibodies, and antigen binding fragments. In some embodiments, the analyte(s) can be localized to subcellular location(s), including, for example, organelles, e.g., mitochondria, Golgi apparatus, endoplasmic reticulum, chloroplasts, endocytic vesicles, exocytic vesicles, vacuoles, lysosomes, etc. In some embodiments, analyte(s) can be peptides or proteins, including without limitation antibodies and enzymes. Additional examples of analytes can be found in Section (I)(c) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. In some embodiments, an analyte can be detected indirectly, such as through detection of an intermediate agent, for example, a ligation product or an analyte capture agent (e.g., an oligonucleotide-conjugated antibody), such as those described herein.
A “biological sample” is typically obtained from the subject for analysis using any of a variety of techniques including, but not limited to, biopsy, surgery, and laser capture microscopy (LCM), and generally includes cells and/or other biological material from the subject. In some embodiments, a biological sample can be a tissue section. In some embodiments, a biological sample can be a fixed and/or stained biological sample (e.g., a fixed and/or stained tissue section). Non-limiting examples of stains include histological stains (e.g., hematoxylin and/or eosin) and immunological stains (e.g., fluorescent stains). In some embodiments, a biological sample (e.g., a fixed and/or stained biological sample) can be imaged. Biological samples are also described in Section (I)(d) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
In some embodiments, a biological sample is permeabilized with one or more permeabilization reagents. For example, permeabilization of a biological sample can facilitate analyte capture. Exemplary permeabilization agents and conditions are described in Section (I)(d)(ii)(13) or the Exemplary Embodiments Section of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
Array-based spatial analysis methods involve the transfer of one or more analytes from a biological sample to an array of features on a substrate, where each feature is associated with a unique spatial location on the array. Subsequent analysis of the transferred analytes includes determining the identity of the analytes and the spatial location of the analytes within the biological sample. The spatial location of an analyte within the biological sample is determined based on the feature to which the analyte is bound (e.g., directly or indirectly) on the array, and the feature's relative spatial location within the array.
A “capture probe” refers to any molecule capable of capturing (directly or indirectly) and/or labelling an analyte (e.g., an analyte of interest) in a biological sample. In some embodiments, the capture probe is a nucleic acid or a polypeptide. In some embodiments, the capture probe includes a barcode (e.g., a spatial barcode and/or a unique molecular identifier (UMI)) and a capture domain). In some embodiments, a capture probe can include a cleavage domain and/or a functional domain (e.g., a primer-binding site, such as for next-generation sequencing (NGS)). See, e.g., Section (II)(b) (e.g., subsections (i)-(vi)) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. Generation of capture probes can be achieved by any appropriate method, including those described in Section (II)(d)(ii) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
In some embodiments, more than one analyte type (e.g., nucleic acids and proteins) from a biological sample can be detected (e.g., simultaneously or sequentially) using any appropriate multiplexing technique, such as those described in Section (IV) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
In some embodiments, detection of one or more analytes (e.g., protein analytes) can be performed using one or more analyte capture agents. As used herein, an “analyte capture agent” refers to an agent that interacts with an analyte (e.g., an analyte in a biological sample) and with a capture probe (e.g., a capture probe attached to a substrate or a feature) to identify the analyte. In some embodiments, the analyte capture agent includes: (i) an analyte binding moiety (e.g., that binds to an analyte), for example, an antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof; (ii) analyte binding moiety barcode; and (iii) an analyte capture sequence. As used herein, the term “analyte binding moiety barcode” refers to a barcode that is associated with or otherwise identifies the analyte binding moiety. As used herein, the term “analyte capture sequence” refers to a region or moiety configured to hybridize to, bind to, couple to, or otherwise interact with a capture domain of a capture probe. In some cases, an analyte binding moiety barcode (or portion thereof) may be able to be removed (e.g., cleaved) from the analyte capture agent. Additional description of analyte capture agents can be found in Section (II)(b)(ix) of WO 2020/176788 and/or Section (II)(b)(viii) U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
There are at least two methods to associate a spatial barcode with one or more neighboring cells, such that the spatial barcode identifies the one or more cells, and/or contents of the one or more cells, as associated with a particular spatial location. One method is to promote analytes or analyte proxies (e.g., intermediate agents) out of a cell and towards a spatially-barcoded array (e.g., including spatially-barcoded capture probes). Another method is to cleave spatially-barcoded capture probes from an array and promote the spatially-barcoded capture probes towards and/or into or onto the biological sample.
In some cases, capture probes may be configured to prime, replicate, and consequently yield optionally barcoded extension products from a template (e.g., a DNA or RNA template, such as an analyte or an intermediate agent (e.g., a ligation product or an analyte capture agent), or a portion thereof), or derivatives thereof (see, e.g., Section (II)(b)(vii) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663 regarding extended capture probes). In some cases, capture probes may be configured to form ligation products with a template (e.g., a DNA or RNA template, such as an analyte or an intermediate agent, or portion thereof), thereby creating ligations products that serve as proxies for a template.
As used herein, an “extended capture probe” refers to a capture probe having additional nucleotides added to the terminus (e.g., 3′ or 5′ end) of the capture probe thereby extending the overall length of the capture probe. For example, an “extended 3′ end” indicates additional nucleotides were added to the most 3′ nucleotide of the capture probe to extend the length of the capture probe, for example, by polymerization reactions used to extend nucleic acid molecules including templated polymerization catalyzed by a polymerase (e.g., a DNA polymerase or a reverse transcriptase). In some embodiments, extending the capture probe includes adding to a 3′ end of a capture probe a nucleic acid sequence that is complementary to a nucleic acid sequence of an analyte or intermediate agent specifically bound to the capture domain of the capture probe. In some embodiments, the capture probe is extended using reverse transcription. In some embodiments, the capture probe is extended using one or more DNA polymerases. The extended capture probes include the sequence of the capture probe and the sequence of the spatial barcode of the capture probe.
In some embodiments, extended capture probes are amplified (e.g., in bulk solution or on the array) to yield quantities that are sufficient for downstream analysis, e.g., via DNA sequencing. In some embodiments, extended capture probes (e.g., DNA molecules) act as templates for an amplification reaction (e.g., a polymerase chain reaction).
Additional variants of spatial analysis methods, including in some embodiments, an imaging step, are described in Section (II)(a) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. Analysis of captured analytes (and/or intermediate agents or portions thereof), for example, including sample removal, extension of capture probes, sequencing (e.g., of a cleaved extended capture probe and/or a cDNA molecule complementary to an extended capture probe), sequencing on the array (e.g., using, for example, in situ hybridization or in situ ligation approaches), temporal analysis, and/or proximity capture, is described in Section (II)(g) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. Some quality control measures are described in Section (II)(h) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
Spatial information can provide information of biological and/or medical importance. For example, the methods and compositions described herein can allow for: identification of one or more biomarkers (e.g., diagnostic, prognostic, and/or for determination of efficacy of a treatment) of a disease or disorder; identification of a candidate drug target for treatment of a disease or disorder; identification (e.g., diagnosis) of a subject as having a disease or disorder; identification of stage and/or prognosis of a disease or disorder in a subject; identification of a subject as having an increased likelihood of developing a disease or disorder; monitoring of progression of a disease or disorder in a subject; determination of efficacy of a treatment of a disease or disorder in a subject; identification of a patient subpopulation for which a treatment is effective for a disease or disorder; modification of a treatment of a subject with a disease or disorder; selection of a subject for participation in a clinical trial; and/or selection of a treatment for a subject with a disease or disorder.
Spatial information can provide information of biological importance. For example, the methods and compositions described herein can allow for: identification of transcriptome and/or proteome expression profiles (e.g., in healthy and/or diseased tissue); identification of multiple analyte types in close proximity (e.g., nearest neighbor analysis); determination of up- and/or down-regulated genes and/or proteins in diseased tissue; characterization of tumor microenvironments; characterization of tumor immune responses; characterization of cells types and their co-localization in tissue; and identification of genetic variants within tissues (e.g., based on gene and/or protein expression profiles associated with specific disease or disorder biomarkers).
Typically, for spatial array-based methods, a substrate functions as a support for direct or indirect attachment of capture probes to features of the array. A “feature” is an entity that acts as a support or repository for various molecular entities used in spatial analysis. In some embodiments, some or all of the features in an array are functionalized for analyte capture. Exemplary substrates are described in Section (II)(c) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. Exemplary features and geometric attributes of an array can be found in Sections (II)(d)(i), (II)(d)(iii), and (II)(d)(iv) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
Generally, analytes and/or intermediate agents (or portions thereof) can be captured when contacting a biological sample with a substrate including capture probes (e.g., a substrate with capture probes embedded, spotted, printed, fabricated on the substrate, or a substrate with features (e.g., beads, wells) comprising capture probes). As used herein, “contact,” “contacted,” and/or “contacting,” a biological sample with a substrate refers to any contact (e.g., direct or indirect) such that capture probes can interact (e.g., bind covalently or non-covalently (e.g., hybridize)) with analytes from the biological sample. Capture can be achieved actively (e.g., using electrophoresis) or passively (e.g., using diffusion). Analyte capture is further described in Section (II)(e) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
In some cases, spatial analysis can be performed by attaching and/or introducing a molecule (e.g., a peptide, a lipid, or a nucleic acid molecule) having a barcode (e.g., a spatial barcode) to a biological sample (e.g., to a cell in a biological sample). In some embodiments, a plurality of molecules (e.g., a plurality of nucleic acid molecules) having a plurality of barcodes (e.g., a plurality of spatial barcodes) are introduced to a biological sample (e.g., to a plurality of cells in a biological sample) for use in spatial analysis. In some embodiments, after attaching and/or introducing a molecule having a barcode to a biological sample, the biological sample can be physically separated (e.g., dissociated) into single cells or cell groups for analysis. Some such methods of spatial analysis are described in Section (III) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663.
In some cases, spatial analysis can be performed by detecting multiple oligonucleotides that hybridize to an analyte. In some instances, for example, spatial analysis can be performed using RNA-templated ligation (RTL). Methods of RTL have been described previously. See, e.g., Credle et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Aug. 21; 45(14):e128. Typically, RTL includes hybridization of two oligonucleotides to adjacent sequences on an analyte (e.g., an RNA molecule, such as an mRNA molecule). In some instances, the oligonucleotides are DNA molecules. In some instances, one of the oligonucleotides includes at least two ribonucleic acid bases at the 3′ end and/or the other oligonucleotide includes a phosphorylated nucleotide at the 5′ end. In some instances, one of the two oligonucleotides includes a capture domain (e.g., a poly(A) sequence, a non-homopolymeric sequence). After hybridization to the analyte, a ligase (e.g., SplintR ligase) ligates the two oligonucleotides together, creating a ligation product. In some instances, the two oligonucleotides hybridize to sequences that are not adjacent to one another. For example, hybridization of the two oligonucleotides creates a gap between the hybridized oligonucleotides. In some instances, a polymerase (e.g., a DNA polymerase) can extend one of the oligonucleotides prior to ligation. After ligation, the ligation product is released from the analyte. In some instances, the ligation product is released using an endonuclease (e.g., RNAse H). The released ligation product can then be captured by capture probes (e.g., instead of direct capture of an analyte) on an array, optionally amplified, and sequenced, thus determining the location and optionally the abundance of the analyte in the biological sample.
During analysis of spatial information, sequence information for a spatial barcode associated with an analyte is obtained, and the sequence information can be used to provide information about the spatial distribution of the analyte in the biological sample. Various methods can be used to obtain the spatial information. In some embodiments, specific capture probes and the analytes they capture are associated with specific locations in an array of features on a substrate. For example, specific spatial barcodes can be associated with specific array locations prior to array fabrication, and the sequences of the spatial barcodes can be stored (e.g., in a database) along with specific array location information, so that each spatial barcode uniquely maps to a particular array location.
Alternatively, specific spatial barcodes can be deposited at predetermined locations in an array of features during fabrication such that at each location, only one type of spatial barcode is present so that spatial barcodes are uniquely associated with a single feature of the array. Where necessary, the arrays can be decoded using any of the methods described herein so that spatial barcodes are uniquely associated with array feature locations, and this mapping can be stored as described above.
When sequence information is obtained for capture probes and/or analytes during analysis of spatial information, the locations of the capture probes and/or analytes can be determined by referring to the stored information that uniquely associates each spatial barcode with an array feature location. In this manner, specific capture probes and captured analytes are associated with specific locations in the array of features. Each array feature location represents a position relative to a coordinate reference point (e.g., an array location, a fiducial marker) for the array. Accordingly, each feature location has an “address” or location in the coordinate space of the array.
Some exemplary spatial analysis workflows are described in the Exemplary Embodiments section of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. See, for example, the Exemplary embodiment starting with “In some non-limiting examples of the workflows described herein, the sample can be immersed . . . ” of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. See also, e.g., the Visium Spatial Gene Expression Reagent Kits User Guide (e.g., Rev C, dated June 2020), and/or the Visium Spatial Tissue Optimization Reagent Kits User Guide (e.g., Rev C, dated July 2020).
In some embodiments, spatial analysis can be performed using dedicated hardware and/or software, such as any of the systems described in Sections (II)(e)(ii) and/or (V) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663, or any of one or more of the devices or methods described in Sections Control Slide for Imaging, Methods of Using Control Slides and Substrates for, Systems of Using Control Slides and Substrates for Imaging, and/or Sample and Array Alignment Devices and Methods, Informational labels of WO 2020/123320.
Suitable systems for performing spatial analysis can include components such as a chamber (e.g., a flow cell or sealable, fluid-tight chamber) for containing a biological sample. The biological sample can be mounted for example, in a biological sample holder. One or more fluid chambers can be connected to the chamber and/or the sample holder via fluid conduits, and fluids can be delivered into the chamber and/or sample holder via fluidic pumps, vacuum sources, or other devices coupled to the fluid conduits that create a pressure gradient to drive fluid flow. One or more valves can also be connected to fluid conduits to regulate the flow of reagents from reservoirs to the chamber and/or sample holder.
The systems can optionally include a control unit that includes one or more electronic processors, an input interface, an output interface (such as a display), and a storage unit (e.g., a solid state storage medium such as, but not limited to, a magnetic, optical, or other solid state, persistent, writeable and/or re-writeable storage medium). The control unit can optionally be connected to one or more remote devices via a network. The control unit (and components thereof) can generally perform any of the steps and functions described herein. Where the system is connected to a remote device, the remote device (or devices) can perform any of the steps or features described herein. The systems can optionally include one or more detectors (e.g., CCD, CMOS) used to capture images. The systems can also optionally include one or more light sources (e.g., LED-based, diode-based, lasers) for illuminating a sample, a substrate with features, analytes from a biological sample captured on a substrate, and various control and calibration media.
The systems can optionally include software instructions encoded and/or implemented in one or more of tangible storage media and hardware components such as application specific integrated circuits. The software instructions, when executed by a control unit (and in particular, an electronic processor) or an integrated circuit, can cause the control unit, integrated circuit, or other component executing the software instructions to perform any of the method steps or functions described herein.
In some cases, the systems described herein can detect (e.g., register an image) the biological sample on the array. Exemplary methods to detect the biological sample on an array are described in PCT Application No. 2020/061064 and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/951,854.
Prior to transferring analytes from the biological sample to the array of features on the substrate, the biological sample can be aligned with the array. Alignment of a biological sample and an array of features including capture probes can facilitate spatial analysis, which can be used to detect differences in analyte presence and/or level within different positions in the biological sample, for example, to generate a three-dimensional map of the analyte presence and/or level. Exemplary methods to generate a two- and/or three-dimensional map of the analyte presence and/or level are described in PCT Application No. 2020/053655 and spatial analysis methods are generally described in WO 2020/061108 and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/951,864.
In some cases, a map of analyte presence and/or level can be aligned to an image of a biological sample using one or more fiducial markers, e.g., objects placed in the field of view of an imaging system which appear in the image produced, as described in the Substrate Attributes Section, Control Slide for Imaging Section of WO 2020/123320, PCT Application No. 2020/061066, and/or U.S. Patent Publication Serial No. 2021/0158522. Fiducial markers can be used as a point of reference or measurement scale for alignment (e.g., to align a sample and an array, to align two substrates, to determine a location of a sample or array on a substrate relative to a fiducial marker) and/or for quantitative measurements of sizes and/or distances. Arrays that can be reset using the methods described herein include, for example, tissue optimization arrays and spatial gene expression arrays. In some cases, an array can be a tissue optimization array used to evaluate analyte capture (e.g., by cDNA synthesis using fluorescent nucleotide analogs). In some cases an array can be a spatial array. Generally, capture probes on a spatial array include spatial barcodes, and capture probes on a tissue optimization array do not, though both include capture domains to capture analytes from a biological sample.
Provided herein are methods for resetting an array (e.g., a spatial array or a tissue optimization array). In some embodiments, the first biological sample is fixed, stained and imaged prior to removing the tissue sample from the array (e.g., a spatial array or a tissue optimization array). Also provided herein are methods of capturing an analyte using an array (e.g., a spatial array) that has been reset using any of the methods described herein. Also provided herein are methods for analyzing capture of a plurality of analytes on a tissue optimization array using a tissue optimization array that has been reset using any of the methods described herein. Array-based spatial analysis methods involve the use of a spatial array, where the spatial array includes an array of features on a substrate. In some embodiments, a biological sample (e.g., tissue sample) is contacted with the spatial array, generally allowing the transfer of one or more analytes from the biological sample to the array of features. In some embodiments, before a spatial analysis is performed, a biological sample is first analyzed using a tissue optimization array to determine the amount or presence of captured analyte for any given sample preparation and/or permeabilization condition.
In some embodiments, after contacting a biological sample with a substrate that includes an array of features (e.g., including a plurality of capture probes), a removal step can be performed to remove the biological sample from the substrate thereby resetting the array. Typically, array resetting occurs before a capture probe of the plurality of capture probes has been enzymatically extended to include a sequence complementary to all or a part of a sequence of an analyte from the biological sample. In some workflows, reverse transcription is used to enzymatically extend a capture probe of the plurality of capture probes to include a sequence complementary to all or part of a sequence of an analyte from the biological sample. Accordingly, in some embodiments, resetting an array occurs before reverse transcription has occurred on the array. In some embodiments, resetting an array occurs before an extension reaction (e.g., an enzymatic extension reaction) has occurred on the array (e.g., performed on a capture probe). In some embodiments, the biological sample is not permeabilized before the array is reset.
As used herein, “resetting” an array refers to the removal of a first tissue that was positioned on an array. In some embodiments, resetting an array can be followed by repositioning a first tissue on the array. In some embodiments, an array is reset in order to position another biological tissue sample on the array (e.g., a second portion of the same biological sample, or a biological sample from a different source, study, or organism). In some embodiments, an array may be reset once. In some embodiments, an array may be reset twice, three times, four times, or five times. In some embodiments, the array is reset in order to be used again, preferably before reverse transcription is performed on the array. In some embodiments, the array is reset in order to be used again, preferably before an extension reaction (e.g., an enzymatic extension reaction) has occurred on the array (e.g., performed on a capture probe).
In some embodiments, a method for resetting an array to which a biological sample has been applied includes treating the array with a set of biological sample removal conditions, such that the biological sample is substantially removed from the array.
In some embodiments, a method for resetting an array includes (a) applying a biological sample to an array comprising a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality of capture probes includes a capture domain that binds specifically to an analyte from the biological sample, and (b) treating the array with a set of biological sample removal conditions, such that the biological sample is substantially removed from the array, thereby resetting the array.
In some embodiments, a method for resetting an array to which a biological sample has been applied includes (a) identifying that the biological sample has been applied to the array incorrectly or does not contain a region of interest, and (b) treating the array with a set of biological sample removal conditions, thereby resetting the array.
As used herein, identifying that a biological sample has been applied to an array “incorrectly” can include identifying that one or more fiducial markers on the array is obscured by the biological sample, identifying that the biological sample is folded, identifying that the biological sample is torn or damaged, identifying that the biological sample was applied to the wrong array section, identifying that the biological sample overlaps with a second biological sample, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, identifying that the biological sample does not contain the region of interest includes imaging the biological sample after staining and/or immunofluorescence. In some cases, an image produced by imaging the biological sample demonstrates an incorrect application of a stain and/or an immunofluorescence antibody. In some cases, an image produced by imaging the biological sample demonstrates nonspecific staining of the biological sample.
In some embodiments, a method for resetting an array includes (a) applying a biological sample to an array including a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality of capture probes includes a capture domain that binds specifically to an analyte from the biological sample, (b) identifying that the biological sample has been applied to the array incorrectly or does not contain a region of interest, and (c) treating the array with a set of biological sample removal conditions, such that the biological sample is substantially removed from the array, thereby resetting the array.
In some embodiments of any of the methods described herein, resetting an array is performed before one or more potentially irreversible alterations to the array. In some embodiments, resetting an array occurs before reverse transcription has occurred on the array. In some embodiments, resetting an array occurs before an enzymatic extension reaction has occurred on the array (e.g., performed on a capture probe). In some embodiments, resetting an array occurs before an extension reaction has occurred on the array (e.g., performed on a capture probe).
In some embodiments, a biological sample is removed from an array to reset the array. In some embodiments, a method of removing a biological sample from an array comprises treating the array with a set of biological sample removal conditions, such that the biological sample is substantially removed from the array.
In some embodiments, resetting an array is performed before the biological sample is imaged; however, it may be easier for a user to identify that the biological sample was incorrectly placed or does not contain a region of interest with a visual aid. For example, it may be easier to identify that the biological sample obscures one or more fiducual markers on the array, or that the biological sample has been folded or torn using a visual aid. As another example, it may be easier to identify that the biological sample does not contain a region of interest after immunofluorescence. Accordingly, in some embodiments, resetting an array is performed after the biological sample is fixed and stained. In some embodiments, resetting an array is performed after the biological sample is fixed. In some embodiments, the biological sample can be fixed in any of the variety of fixatives described in, for example, in Section (I)(d)(ii)(3)-(6) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663. In some embodiments, the biological sample is stained. In some embodiments, the biological sample can be stained using known staining techniques, including but not limited to, Can-Grunwald, Giemsa, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Jenner's, Leishman, Masson's trichrome, Papanicolaou, Romanowsky, silver, Sudan, Wright's, and/or Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) staining techniques. See, for example, Sections (I)(d)(ii)(3)-(6) of WO 2020/176788 and/or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0277663 for fixing and staining techniques. In some embodiments, resetting an array is performed after the biological sample is evaluated using immunofluorescence. As such, resetting an array can be performed after fixing, immunofluorescence, staining, and/or imaging but prior to performing analyte capture and downstream enzymatic reactions on the captured analyte, for example reverse transcription of a captured mRNA molecule. Once analytes from a biological sample have been captured and extended on the array, the spatial barcodes are associated with the spatial location of the captured analyte in the biological sample. However, staining and/or fixing of a biological sample leaves the spatial barcodes intact thereby allowing for array resetting.
Treating an array (e.g., spatial array or tissue optimization array) to which a biological sample has been applied with a set of biological sample removal conditions can include treating the array with any appropriate reagents, temperatures, or other conditions. Typically, treating an array with a set of biological sample removal conditions includes treating the array with a base. In some embodiments, for example, treating the array with a base is the first part of the set of biological sample removal conditions. In some embodiments, the biological sample on the array is first treated enzymatically and/or chemically to degrade the biological sample prior to treating the array with a base.
In some embodiments, treating an array (e.g., spatial array or tissue optimization array) to which a biological sample has been applied with a set of biological sample removal conditions can include treating enzymatically and/or chemically to degrade the biological sample. For example, treating an array to which a biological sample has been applied with a set of biological sample removal conditions can include treating the array with an enzyme (e.g., a proteinase, e.g., proteinase K) to remove at least a portion of the biological sample from the array (e.g., on a glass slide). In some embodiments, treating an array to which a biological sample has been applied with a set of biological sample removal conditions can include ablation of the biological sample (e.g., laser ablation). In some embodiments, treating an array to which a biological sample has been applied with a set of biological sample removal conditions can include treating the array with a proteinase. In some embodiments, the proteinase is proteinase K. Treating with a proteinase can include any appropriate conditions, e.g., to allow the proteinase to function. In some embodiments, treating with a proteinase can include treating with a buffer (e.g., Tris, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid), TES (2-[(2-Hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl)amino]ethanesulfonic acid), and combinations thereof) at an appropriate pH (e.g., about pH 8.0 to about 10.0 (e.g., pH about 8.5 to about 9.5, about 8.8 to about 9.2, or about 9.0)) and appropriate concentration (e.g., about 1 mM to about 20 mM (e.g., about 5 mM to about 15 mM, about 8 mM to about 12 mM, or about 10 mM)), optionally with one or more additional reagents, such as a surfactant (e.g., sodium dodecyl sulfate) at any appropriate concentration (e.g., about 5% to about 15% w/v (e.g., about 8% to about 12% w/v, or about 10% w/v)).
In some embodiments, the array (e.g., spatial array or tissue optimization array) is treated with the proteinease (e.g., proteinase K) for between 10 minutes and 120 minutes (e.g., between 10 minutes and 100 minutes, between 10 minutes and 90 minutes, between 10 minutes and 80 minutes, between 10 minutes and 70 minutes, between 10 minutes and 60 minutes, between 10 minutes and 45 minutes, between 10 minutes and 30 minutes, between 30 minutes and 120 minutes, between 30 minutes and 100 minutes, between 30 minutes and 90 minutes, between 30 minutes and 80 minutes, between 30 minutes and 70 minutes, between 30 minutes and 60 minutes, between 30 minutes and 45 minutes, between 45 minutes and 120 minutes, between 45 minutes and 100 minutes, between 45 minutes and 90 minutes, between 45 minutes and 80 minutes, between 45 minutes and 70 minutes, between 45 minutes and 60 minutes, between 60 minutes and 120 minutes, between 60 minutes and 100 minutes, between 60 minutes and 90 minutes, between 60 minutes and 80 minutes, between 60 minutes and 70 minutes, between 70 minutes and 120 minutes, between 70 minutes and 100 minutes, between 70 minutes and 90 minutes, between 70 minutes and 80 minutes, between 80 minutes and 120 minutes, between 80 minutes and 100 minutes, between 80 minutes and 90 minutes, between 90 minutes and 120 minutes, between 90 minutes and 100 minutes, or between 100 minutes and 120 minutes). In some embodiments, the array is treated with proteinase K for approximately 60 minutes.
In some embodiments, the array (e.g., spatial array or tissue optimization array) is incubated during the treatment with a proteinase at a temperature between 40 degrees and 60 degrees (e.g., between 40 degrees and 58 degrees, between 40 degrees and 56 degrees, between 40 degrees and 54 degrees, between 40 degrees and 52 degrees, between 40 degrees and 50 degrees, between 40 degrees and 48 degrees, between 40 degrees and 46 degrees, between 40 degrees and 44 degrees, between 40 degrees and 42 degrees, between 42 degrees and 60 degrees, between 42 degrees and 58 degrees, between 42 degrees and 56 degrees, between 42 degrees and 54 degrees, between 42 degrees and 52 degrees, between 42 degrees and 50 degrees, between 42 degrees and 48 degrees, between 42 degrees and 46 degrees, between 42 degrees and 44 degrees, between 44 degrees and 60 degrees, between 44 degrees and 58 degrees, between 44 degrees and 56 degrees, between 44 degrees and 54 degrees, between 44 degrees and 52 degrees, between 44 degrees and 50 degrees, between 44 degrees and 48 degrees, between 44 degrees and 46 degrees, between 46 degrees and 60 degrees, between 46 degrees and 58 degrees, between 46 degrees and 56 degrees, between 46 degrees and 54 degrees, between 46 degrees and 52 degrees, between 46 degrees and 50 degrees, between 46 degrees and 48 degrees, between 48 degrees and 60 degrees, between 48 degrees and 58 degrees, between 48 degrees and 56 degrees, between 48 degrees and 54 degrees, between 48 degrees and 52 degrees, between 48 degrees and 50 degrees, between 50 degrees and 60 degrees, between 50 degrees and 58 degrees, between 50 degrees and 56 degrees, between 50 degrees and 54 degrees, between 50 degrees and 52 degrees, between 52 degrees and 60 degrees, between 52 degrees and 58 degrees, between 52 degrees and 56 degrees, between 52 degrees and 54 degrees, between 54 degrees and 60 degrees, between 54 degrees and 58 degrees, between 54 degrees and 56 degrees, between 56 degrees and 60 degrees, between 56 degrees and 58 degrees, or between 58 degrees and 60 degrees) Celsius. In some embodiments, the array is incubated during the application of a proteinase at a temperature of approximately 50 degrees Celsius.
In some embodiments, treating an array (e.g., spatial array or tissue optimization array) to which a biological sample has been applied with a set of biological sample removal conditions can include treating the array with a base (e.g., soaking the array in a base). In some embodiments, the base can be sodium hydroxide (NaOH), potassium hydroxide (KOH), or a combination thereof. Additional suitable bases that can be used in the methods described herein are known in the art. In some embodiments, the array is treated with the base for between 1 minute and 20 minutes (e.g., between 1 minute and 18 minutes, between 1 minute and 16 minutes, between 1 minute and 14 minutes, between 1 minute and 12 minutes, between 1 minute and 10 minutes, between 1 minute and 8 minutes, between 1 minute and 6 minutes, between 1 minute and 4 minutes, between 1 minute and 2 minutes, between 2 minutes and 20 minutes, between 2 minutes and 18 minutes, between 2 minutes and 16 minutes, between 2 minutes and 14 minutes, between 2 minutes and 12 minutes, between 2 minutes and 10 minutes, between 2 minutes and 8 minutes, between 2 minutes and 6 minutes, between 2 minutes and 4 minutes, between 4 minutes and 20 minutes, between 4 minutes and 18 minutes, between 4 minutes and 16 minutes, between 4 minutes and 14 minutes, between 4 minutes and 12 minutes, between 4 minutes and 10 minutes, between 4 minutes and 8 minutes, between 4 minutes and 6 minutes, between 6 minutes and 20 minutes, between 6 minutes and 18 minutes, between 6 minutes and 16 minutes, between 6 minutes and 14 minutes, between 6 minutes and 12 minutes, between 6 minutes and 10 minutes, between 6 minutes and 8 minutes, between 8 minutes and 20 minutes, between 8 minutes and 18 minutes, between 8 minutes and 16 minutes, between 8 minutes and 14 minutes, between 8 minutes and 12 minutes, between 8 minutes and 10 minutes, between 10 minutes and 20 minutes, between 10 minutes and 18 minutes, between 10 minutes and 16 minutes, between 10 minutes and 14 minutes, between 10 minutes and 12 minutes, between 12 minutes and 20 minutes, between 12 minutes and 18 minutes, between 12 minutes and 16 minutes, between 12 minutes and 14 minutes, between 14 minutes and 20 minutes, between 14 minutes and 18 minutes, between 14 minutes and 16 minutes, between 16 minutes and 20 minutes, between 16 minutes and 18 minutes, or between 18 minutes and 20 minutes). In some embodiments, the array is treated with the base for approximately 5 minutes. In some embodiments, the array is treated with the base for approximately 10 minutes.
In some embodiments, the array (e.g., spatial array or tissue optimization array) is treated with the base at a concentration of approximately 0.08 M. In some embodiments, the array is treated with the base (e.g., potassium hydroxide) at a concentration of about 0.01 M to 0.2 M, including, but not limited to, about 0.01 M, about 0.02 M, about 0.03 M, 0.04 M, about 0.05 M, about 0.06 M, about 0.07 M, about 0.08 M, about 0.09 M, about 0.10 M, about 0.11 M, about 0.12 M, about 0.13 M, about 0.14 M, about 0.15 M, about 0.16 M, about 0.17 M, about 0.18 M, about 0.19 M, or about 0.20 M, or any ranges included therein. In some embodiments, the biological sample is completely removed from the array after the array is treated with the base. In some embodiments, removing the biological sample from the array further comprises rinsing and drying the array. In some embodiments, the array is treated for a second time with base, using any of the times or concentrations of base described herein. In some cases, treating the array with the base can remove or help to remove any nucleic acid (e.g., RNA) hybridized to a capture probe on the array.
In some embodiments, treating an array (e.g., spatial array or tissue optimization array) to which a biological sample has been applied with a set of biological sample removal conditions can include washing the array with water (e.g., nuclease-free water and/or ultrapure water), washing the array with a buffer, and drying, or a combination thereof. A buffer can be any appropriate buffer, for example Tris, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid), TES (2-[(2-Hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl)amino]ethanesulfonic acid), at any appropriate pH (e.g., about 6.0 to about 8.0 (e.g., about 6.5 to about 7.5, about 6.8 to about 7.2, or about 7.0)) and any appropriate concentration (e.g., about 1 mM to about 20 mM (e.g., about 5 mM to about 15 mM, about 8 mM to about 12 mM, or about 10 mM)). Washing the array (e.g., with water or buffer) can include repeatedly washing the array (e.g., 10, 15, 20, or more times). In some embodiments, drying can include centrifugation and/or air drying. For example, in some embodiments, treating an array to which a biological sample has been applied with a set of biological sample removal conditions can include, sequentially, treating the array with a base (e.g., 0.08 M KOH for 10 minutes), optionally treating with a base for a second time (e.g., 0.08 M KOH for 5 minutes), washing with buffer (e.g., 10 mM Tris, pH 7.0, 15 times), washing with water (e.g, nuclease-free water and/or ultrapure water, 20 times), and optionally drying (e.g., via centrifugation or air drying). For example, in some embodiments, treating an array to which a biological sample has been applied with a set of biological sample removal conditions can include, sequentially, treating the array with a proteinase (e.g., at 3.3 mg/mL in 10 mM Tris, pH 9 and 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate) treating the array with a base (e.g., 0.08 M KOH for 10 minutes), optionally treating with a base for a second time (e.g., 0.08 M KOH for 5 minutes), washing with buffer (e.g., 10 mM Tris, pH 7.0, 15 times), washing with water (e.g, nuclease-free water and/or ultrapure water, 20 times), and optionally drying (e.g., via centrifugation or air drying).
A reset array (e.g., spatial array or tissue optimization array) can be stored at room temperature or 4° C. in a sealed container or a dessicator for up to 7 days before placing a new biological sample on the array.
Also provided herein are methods for using of an array (e.g., spatial array or tissue optimization array) reset using any of the methods described herein. In some embodiments, methods for using an array include resetting an array using any of the methods described herein, contacting the array with a biological sample (e.g., a second portion of a biological sample or a biological sample from a different source, study, or organism), and capturing an analyte from the biological sample on the array.
Also provided herein are methods for performing a spatial analysis using a spatial array reset using any of the methods described herein. In some embodiments, methods for performing a spatial analysis include resetting a spatial array using any of the methods described herein, contacting the spatial array with a biological sample (e.g., a second portion of a biological sample or a biological sample from a different source, study, or organism), and capturing an analyte from the biological sample on the spatial array. In some embodiments, the methods can further include determining (i) all or a portion of a sequence corresponding to the spatial barcode, or a complement thereof, and (ii) all or a portion of a sequence corresponding to the analyte, or a complement thereof.
Also provided herein are methods for analyzing analyte capture using a tissue optimization array reset using any of the methods described herein. In some embodiments, methods for analyzing analyte capture include resetting a tissue optimization array using any of the methods described herein, contacting the tissue optimization array with a biological sample (e.g., a second portion of a biological sample or a biological sample from a different source, study, or organism), capturing a plurality of analytes from the biological sample on the tissue optimization array, and analyzing the amount, distribution, diffusion, or a combination thereof, of the analytes.
Embodiment 1 is a method for resetting an array, the method comprising:
(a) applying a biological sample to an array, wherein the array comprises a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality of capture probes comprises a capture domain that binds specifically to an analyte from the biological sample;
(b) identifying that the biological sample has been applied to the array incorrectly or does not contain a region of interest; and
(c) treating the array with a set of biological sample removal conditions, such that the biological sample is substantially removed from the array, thereby resetting the array.
Embodiment 2 is a method for resetting an array to which a biological sample has been applied, the method comprising:
(a) identifying that the biological sample has been applied to the array incorrectly or does not contain a region of interest; and
(b) treating the array with a set of biological sample removal conditions, such that the biological sample is substantially removed from the array,
wherein the array comprises a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality of capture probes comprises a capture domain that binds specifically to an analyte from the biological sample, thereby resetting the array.
Embodiment 3 is the method of embodiment 1 or embodiment 2, wherein identifying that the biological sample has been applied to the array incorrectly comprises identifying that one or more fiducial markers on the array is obscured by the biological sample.
Embodiment 4 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-3, wherein identifying that the biological sample has been applied to the array incorrectly comprises identifying that the biological sample is folded.
Embodiment 5 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-4, wherein identifying that the biological sample has been applied to the array incorrectly comprises identifying that the biological sample is torn or damaged.
Embodiment 6 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-5, wherein identifying that the biological sample has been applied to the array incorrectly comprises identifying that the biological sample overlaps with a second biological sample.
Embodiment 7 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-6, wherein identifying that the biological sample does not contain the region of interest comprises imaging the biological sample after staining and/or immunofluorescence.
Embodiment 8 is the method of embodiment 7, wherein an image produced by imaging the biological sample demonstrates an incorrect application of a stain and/or an immunofluorescence antibody.
Embodiment 9 is the method of embodiment 7 or embodiment 8, wherein an image produced by imaging the biological sample demonstrates nonspecific staining of the biological sample.
Embodiment 10 is a method for resetting an array to which a biological sample has been applied, the method comprising:
treating the array with a set of biological sample removal conditions, such that the biological sample is substantially removed from the array,
wherein the array comprises a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality of capture probes comprises a capture domain that binds specifically to an analyte from the biological sample, thereby resetting the array.
Embodiment 11 is a method for resetting an array, the method comprising:
(a) applying a biological sample to an array wherein the array comprises a plurality of capture probes, wherein a capture probe of the plurality of capture probes comprises a capture domain that binds specifically to an analyte from the biological sample; and
(b) treating the array with a set of biological sample removal conditions, such that the biological sample is substantially removed from the array, thereby resetting the array.
Embodiment 12 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-11, wherein the array is a tissue optimization array or a spatial array.
Embodiment 13 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-12, wherein prior to treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions, no reverse transcription has been performed on the array.
Embodiment 14 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-12, wherein prior to treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions, no enzymatic extension reaction has been performed on the capture probe.
Embodiment 15 is the method of embodiment 14, wherein no extension reaction has been performed on the capture probe.
Embodiment 16 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-15, wherein treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions comprises treating the array with a base.
Embodiment 17 is the method of embodiment 16, wherein the base comprises a base selected from the group consisting of potassium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, and combinations thereof.
Embodiment 18 is the method of embodiment 16 or 17, wherein treating with the base comprises treating the array with about 40 mM to about 120 mM of the base.
Embodiment 19 is the method of any one of embodiments 16-18, wherein treating the array with the base comprises treating the array with about 75 mM to about 85 mM of the base.
Embodiment 20 is the method of any one of embodiments 16-19, wherein treating the array with the base comprises treating the array with the base for between about 1 minute and about 20 minutes.
Embodiment 21 is the method of any one of embodiments 16-20, wherein treating the array with the base comprises treating the array with the base for about 8 minutes to about 12 minutes.
Embodiment 22 is the method of any one of embodiments 16-21, wherein treating the array with a base comprises treating the array with a base for one, two, three, four or five times.
Embodiment 23 is the method of any one of embodiments 16-22, wherein treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions further comprises washing the array one or more times.
Embodiment 24 is the method of embodiment 23, wherein the washing comprises water that is nuclease-free water and/or ultrapure water.
Embodiment 25 is the method of any one of embodiments 16-24, wherein treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions further comprises washing the array with a buffer one or more times.
Embodiment 26 is the method of embodiment 25, wherein the buffer is selected from the group consisting of Tris, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid), TES (2-[(2-Hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethylethyl)amino]ethanesulfonic acid), and combinations thereof.
Embodiment 27 is the method of embodiment 25 or 26, wherein the buffer has a concentration of about 1 mM to about 20 mM.
Embodiment 28 is the method of any one of embodiments 25-27, wherein the buffer has a concentration of about 8 mM to about 12 mM.
Embodiment 29 is the method of any one of embodiments 25-28, wherein the buffer has a pH of about 6.0 to about 8.0.
Embodiment 30 is the method of any one of embodiments 25-29, wherein the buffer has a pH of about 6.5 to about 7.5.
Embodiment 31 is the method of any one of embodiments 25-30, wherein the buffer has a pH of about 6.8 to about 7.2.
Embodiment 32 is the method of any one of embodiments 16-31, wherein treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions further comprises drying the array.
Embodiment 33 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-32, wherein, before treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions, the biological sample is not permeabilized.
Embodiment 34 is the method of embodiment 33, wherein treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions comprises, sequentially, treating the array with the base, washing the array with the buffer, washing the array with water, and optionally drying the array.
Embodiment 35 is the method of any one of embodiments 16-34, wherein treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions further comprises treating the array with a proteinase.
Embodiment 36 is the method of embodiment 35, wherein treating the array with the proteinase precedes treating with the base.
Embodiment 37 is the method of embodiment 35 or 36, wherein the proteinase is proteinase K.
Embodiment 38 is the method of any one of embodiments 35-37, wherein treating the array with the proteinase is for between 10 minutes and 2 hours.
Embodiment 39 is the method of any one of embodiments 35-38, wherein treating the array with the proteinase is for between 30 minutes and 90 minutes.
Embodiment 40 is the method of any one of embodiments 35-38, wherein treating the array with the proteinase is for about 55 minutes to about 65 minutes.
Embodiment 41 is the method of any one of embodiments 35-40, wherein during treatment of the array with the proteinase, the biological sample is incubated at between 40 degrees and 60 degrees Celsius.
Embodiment 42 is the method of any one of embodiments 35-40, wherein during treatment of the array with proteinase, the biological sample is incubated at between 45 degrees to about 55 degrees Celsius.
Embodiment 43 is the method of any one of embodiments 35-42, wherein treating the array with the proteinase further comprises treating the array with a surfactant and a proteinase buffer.
Embodiment 44 is the method of embodiment 43, wherein the surfactant is sodium dodecyl sulfate.
Embodiment 45 is the method of embodiment 43 or 44, wherein the surfactant is present in an amount of about 5% w/v to about 20% w/v.
Embodiment 46 is the method of embodiment 43 or 44, wherein the surfactant is present in an amount of about 8% w/v to about 10% w/v.
Embodiment 47 is the method of any one of embodiments 43-46, wherein the proteinase buffer is Tris.
Embodiment 48 is the method of any one of embodiments 43-47, wherein the proteinase buffer has a concentration of about 1 mM to about 20 mM.
Embodiment 49 is the method of any one of embodiments 43-48, wherein the proteinase buffer has a concentration of about 8 mM to about 12 mM.
Embodiment 50 is the method of any one of embodiments 43-49, wherein the proteinase buffer has a pH of about 8.0 to about 10.0.
Embodiment 51 is the method of any one of embodiments 43-49, wherein the proteinase buffer has a pH of about 8.5 to about 9.5.
Embodiment 52 is the method of any one of embodiments 43-49, wherein the proteinase buffer has a pH of about 8.8 to about 9.2.
Embodiment 53 is the method of any one of embodiments 43-52, wherein treating the array with the set of biological sample removal conditions comprises, treating the array with the proteinease, washing the array with water, treating the array with the base, washing the array with the buffer, washing the array with water, and optionally drying.
Embodiment 54 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-53, wherein the array comprises a slide.
Embodiment 55 is the method of embodiment 54, wherein the slide is a glass slide.
Embodiment 56 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-55, wherein the biological sample is an animal sample.
Embodiment 57 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-55, wherein the biological sample is a human sample.
Embodiment 58 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-55, wherein the biological sample is a rodent sample.
Embodiment 59 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-58, wherein the biological sample is a breast, brain, heart, small intestine, eye, testes, or kidney sample.
Embodiment 60 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-59, wherein the biological sample is a cancerous sample or a sample suspected of having cancerous cells.
Embodiment 61 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-60, wherein the biological sample is a tissue section.
Embodiment 62 is the method of embodiment 61, wherein the tissue section is a fresh frozen tissue section.
Embodiment 63 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-62, wherein the biological sample is fixed.
Embodiment 64 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-63, wherein the biological sample is formalin-fixed.
Embodiment 65 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-63, wherein the biological sample is fixed using methanol.
Embodiment 66 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-63, wherein the biological sample is fixed using acetone.
Embodiment 67 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-66, wherein the biological sample is stained.
Embodiment 68 is the method of embodiment 67, wherein the stain is a histological stain.
Embodiment 69 is the method of embodiment 68, wherein the histological stain is a hematoxylin and eosin stain.
Embodiment 70 is the method of any one of embodiments 1-69, wherein the biological sample is imaged using immunofluorescence.
Embodiment 71 is a method for capturing an analyte using an array, the method comprising:
(a) resetting an array according to any one of embodiments 1-70, wherein the array is a spatial array and the capture probe further comprises a spatial barcode;
(b) contacting the spatial array with a biological sample; and
(c) capturing an analyte from the biological sample on the spatial array.
Embodiment 72 is the method of embodiment 71, wherein the analyte comprises RNA, DNA, a protein, a small molecule, or a metabolite.
Embodiment 73 is the method of embodiment 71 or 72, further comprising determining (i) all or a portion of a sequence corresponding to the spatial barcode, or a complement thereof, and (ii) all or a portion of a sequence corresponding to the analyte, or a complement thereof.
Embodiment 74 is a method for analyzing capture of a plurality of analytes on a tissue optimization array, the method comprising:
(a) resetting a tissue optimization array according to any one of embodiments 1-70;
(b) contacting the tissue optimization array with a biological sample;
(c) capturing a plurality of analytes from the biological sample on the tissue optimization array; and
(d) analyzing the amount, distribution, and/or diffusion of the plurality of analytes based on the analytes from the biological sample captured on the tissue optimization array.
Embodiment 75 is the method of embodiment 74, wherein the plurality of analytes comprises RNA, DNA, a protein, a small molecule, a metabolite, or a combination thereof.
In a non-limiting example, an array is reset by removing tissue that had been placed the array (
While tissue removal incubation step (a) may not remove tissue completely and trace amounts of tissue may still remain on the array (
Arrays on a slide are reset prior to tissue permeabilization. When immersing a slide in a solution, the slide is typically completely immersed for about 3 seconds.
Reagent volumes described in this Example can accommodate up to two slides. If resetting two slides, slides are placed back to back so that tissue sections are facing outwards.
A water bath or heat block is preheated to 50° C. to warm 30 mL proteinase K buffer (1 mM Tris, pH 9; 10% SDS, 3.3 mg/mL proteinease K). An array including a tissue sample on a slide is transferred to a 50 mL centrifuge tube containing the warmed proteinase K buffer and incubated for 1 hour at 50° C. The tube is inverted and some tissue may remain on the array. The slide is immersed in ultrapure water. The slide is transferred to a 50-mL centrifuge tube containing 30 mL 0.08M potassium hydroxide (KOH) and incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature. The tube is inverted. The slide is transferred to a new 50 mL centrifuge tube containing 30 mL 0.08 M KOH and incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes. The slide is transferred to a 50 mL centrifuge tube containing 10 mM Tris, pH 7 and inverted slowly. The slide is immersed in fresh ultrapure water. Excess water is removed using a laboratory wipe on the back of the slide, without touching the active surface of the slide. The slide is dried, optionally for 30 seconds in a slide spinner, or in a 50 mL centrifuge tube centrifuged at 250 relative centrifugal force (rcf) for 30 seconds in a swinging bucket rotor.
The slide, and each array within the slide, is examined for any remaining tissue. If tissue remains, the reset protocol above is repeated.
A slide where tissue is removed, thus resetting the slide, can be stored in a sealed container or dessicator at room temperature or at 4° C. for up to 7 days before placing a new tissue section on one or more of the active arrays on the slide.
In a non-limiting example, a tissue sample is removed from an array as described above in Example 1. For this example, the array was originally in contact with mouse brain tissue, wherein the mouse brain tissue was removed, thereby resetting the array and replaced with a section of a human ovarian tumor tissue (
The mouse brain tissue, which was first stained and imaged (
The reset array was also compared to a control array for the potential contamination of the HPCA gene. The hippocalcin gene, or HPCA, is highly expressed in the hippocampus region of mouse brain but not in human ovarian tumors. The results shown in
In a non-limiting example, experiments were performed to analyze the hybridization of a fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide to the capture probes on three different arrays: (1) an array slide that had fixed and stained tissue on it and was reset, (2) an array that had been processed through the entire spatial analyte localization workflow as described herein, and (3) a new array. An image of the tissue on the control array (which was reset for array (1)) is seen in
Briefly, the array having fixed and stained tissue was exposed to the previously described reset protocol, and oligonucleotides containing partial Read 1 sequences complexed with Cy3 fluorescent moieties were hybridized to the array. The fluorescently labeled oligonucleotides were also hybridized to the array that had been processed through the entire spatial analyte detection workflow (lacking tissue), as well as a new array. Fluorescent imaging results from the reset array (
In experiments to demonstrate the affect of the reset methods on probes affixed to the array slide, blocks of OCT medium without tissue were created and slices places on spatial array slides. Some slides were reset (
Reset arrays can be used with both fixed and stained tissue as well as fresh frozen cryostat tissue sections. Breast cancer tissue was originally applied to a spatial array (exemplary tissue shown in
MUCL1 is a gene highly expressed in human breast cancer tissue (exemplary expression shown in
Similarly, when a mouse brain tissue section was applied to a spatial array, the array was reset, and human breast cancer or human heart tissue sections (either fixed and stained or fresh frozen tissue samples), were applied to the reset arrays. Various sequencing metrics were analyzed.
Resetting arrays is compatible with use of immunofluorescence, both before reset, and when using a new biological sample on an array. Human breast cancer tissue was initially placed on a spatial array and stained with DAPI, an Alexa 647-conjugated anti-CD3 antibody (Biolegend), and an Alexa 488-conjugated anti-CD8 antibody (Biolegend). The array was reset as described in Example 1, and a mouse brain tissue sample was placed on the reset array. The mouse brain tissue was stained with DAPI, an Alexa 555-conjugated anti-NeuN antibody (Abcam), and a FITC-conjugated anti-GFAP antibody (Abcam). There was no difference observed in immunofluorescence images of the reset array (
Transcript capture and sequencing metrics of the reset array were similar to the control array following removal of an IF-stained biological sample.
It was determined through experimentation that arrays could be reset multiple times without compromising the array capture probes. A mouse brain tissue sample was evaluated on arrays that had been reset one, two, or three times as in Example 1 and compared to a mouse brain tissue sample on a non-reset array (control). The first tissue set on the arrays was a human breast cancer tissue. The arrays were reset, and for the twice and three-times reset arrays, a human lung tissue sample was placed on the array. The arrays were reset, for the three-times reset array, a human cerebellum tissue sample was placed on the array. The array was reset. All slides were fixed with methanol and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
Transcript capture and sequencing metrics of the reset arrays were similar to control following multiple resets.
Resetting arrays can be performed on tissue optimization arrays, for example, for determining conditions for permeabilization and/or analyte capture following removal of a first biological sample. Three tissues were tested for the effect of reset on permeabilization of the second biological sample and/or the capture of transcripts therefrom on non-spatially barcoded (i.e., tissue optimization) arrays: mouse brain, mouse liver, and mouse spleen. In each case, the arrays initially had human lung tumor samples covering the entire capture area of the arrays, and the slides were reset as in Example 1, and the new tissues were placed on the slide, stained with H&E, permeabilized, and the transcripts were captured. Capture was evaluated by fluorescence microscopy of reverse-transcribed cDNA using fluorescent nucleotides.
In
Resetting arrays can be performed with multiple tissue types as the initial biological sample. To demonstrate this, different types of fixed and stained mouse or human tissues were originally placed on an array (upper figures in
For those reset slides where mouse tissue was the original tissue, it was determined that the mouse tissues were removed completely or substantially completely wherein the gene expression of the control versus the reset slides was comparable. The same results were seen when the original tissue was of human origin. It was determined that multiple tissue types could be removed, slides reset, and new, different tissues applied to reset slides without compromising gene expression analysis.
Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e), this application is a continuation of International Patent Application PCT/US2021/034212, with an international filing date of May 26, 2021, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 63/030,190, filed on May 26, 2020 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 63/041,481, filed on Jun. 19, 2020, each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4683195 | Mullis | Jul 1987 | A |
4683202 | Mullis | Jul 1987 | A |
4800159 | Mullis | Jan 1989 | A |
4883867 | Lee | Nov 1989 | A |
4965188 | Mullis | Oct 1990 | A |
4988617 | Landegren et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5002882 | Lunnen | Mar 1991 | A |
5130238 | Malek | Jul 1992 | A |
5308751 | Ohkawa | May 1994 | A |
5321130 | Yue | Jun 1994 | A |
5410030 | Yue | Apr 1995 | A |
5436134 | Haugland | Jul 1995 | A |
5455166 | Walker | Oct 1995 | A |
5494810 | Barany et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5503980 | Cantor | Apr 1996 | A |
5512439 | Hornes | Apr 1996 | A |
5512462 | Cheng | Apr 1996 | A |
5582977 | Yue | Dec 1996 | A |
5599675 | Brenner | Feb 1997 | A |
5641658 | Adams | Jun 1997 | A |
5648245 | Fire et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658751 | Yue | Aug 1997 | A |
5750341 | Macevicz | May 1998 | A |
5763175 | Brenner | Jun 1998 | A |
5830711 | Barany et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837832 | Chee et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5854033 | Lizardi | Dec 1998 | A |
5863753 | Haugland | Jan 1999 | A |
5871921 | Landegren et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5912148 | Eggerding | Jun 1999 | A |
5925545 | Reznikoff et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5958775 | Wickstrrom | Sep 1999 | A |
5965443 | Reznikoff et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6013440 | Lipshutz | Jan 2000 | A |
6027889 | Barany et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6060240 | Kamb et al. | May 2000 | A |
6130073 | Eggerding | Oct 2000 | A |
6143496 | Brown | Nov 2000 | A |
6153389 | Haarer | Nov 2000 | A |
6159736 | Reznikoff et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165714 | Lane et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6210891 | Nyren | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6210894 | Brennan | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214587 | Dattagupta | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6251639 | Kurn | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258568 | Nyren | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266459 | Walt | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268148 | Barany et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274320 | Rothberg | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6291180 | Chu | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300063 | Lipshutz et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309824 | Drmanac | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6344316 | Lockhart | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355431 | Chee | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368801 | Faruqi | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6401267 | Drmanac | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404907 | Gilchrist | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6432360 | Church et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6503713 | Rana | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506561 | Cheval et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6544732 | Chee | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6573043 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579695 | Lambalot | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6620584 | Chee | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632641 | Brennan | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6737236 | Pieken et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6770441 | Dickinson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6773886 | Kaufman | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787308 | Balasubramanian | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6797470 | Barany et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800453 | Labaer | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812005 | Fan et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6828100 | Ronaghi | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6833246 | Balasubramanian | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6852487 | Barany et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6859570 | Walt | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6864052 | Drmanac | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6867028 | Janulaitis | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872816 | Hall et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6875572 | Prudent et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6890741 | Fan et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6897023 | Fu | May 2005 | B2 |
6913881 | Aizenstein et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6942968 | Dickinson et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7011944 | Prudent et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7057026 | Barnes | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7083980 | Reznikoff et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7115400 | Adessi | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7118883 | Inoue | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7166431 | Chee et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7192735 | Lambalot | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7211414 | Hardin | May 2007 | B2 |
7255994 | Lao | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258976 | Mitsuhashi | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7282328 | Kong et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7297518 | Quake | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7329492 | Hardin | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7358047 | Hafner et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7361488 | Fan et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7378242 | Hurt | May 2008 | B2 |
7393665 | Brenner | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7405281 | Xu | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7407757 | Brenner | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7537897 | Brenner | May 2009 | B2 |
7563576 | Chee | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7579153 | Brenner | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7582420 | Oliphant et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601498 | Mao | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608434 | Reznikoff et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611869 | Fan | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7635566 | Brenner | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7666612 | Johnsson | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7674752 | He | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7709198 | Luo et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7776547 | Roth | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776567 | Mao | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7803943 | Mao | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7888009 | Barany et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7892747 | Barany et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7914981 | Barany et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7955794 | Shen et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7960119 | Chee | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8003354 | Shen et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8076063 | Fan | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8092784 | Mao | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8148068 | Brenner | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8206917 | Chee | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8288103 | Oliphant | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8383338 | Kitzman | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8460865 | Chee | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8481257 | Van Eijk | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8481292 | Casbon | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8481698 | Lieberman et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8507204 | Pierce et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8551710 | Bernitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8568979 | Stuelpnagel et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8586310 | Mitra | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8597891 | Barany et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8603743 | Liu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8604182 | Luo et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8614073 | Van Eijk | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8624016 | Barany et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8685889 | Van Eijk | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8741564 | Seligmann | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8741606 | Casbon | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8785353 | Van Eijk | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8790873 | Namsaraev et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8809238 | Livak et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8815512 | Van Eijk | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8835358 | Fodor | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8865410 | Shendure | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8906626 | Oliphant et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8911945 | Van Eijk | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8936912 | Mitra | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8951726 | Luo et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8951728 | Rasmussen | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9005891 | Sinicropi et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9023768 | Van Eijk | May 2015 | B2 |
9062348 | Van Eijk | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9080210 | Van Eijk | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9194001 | Brenner | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9290808 | Fodor | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9290809 | Fodor | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9328383 | Van Eijk | May 2016 | B2 |
9334536 | Van Eijk | May 2016 | B2 |
9371598 | Chee | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9376716 | Van Eijk | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9376719 | Van Eijk | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9416409 | Hayden | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9447459 | Van Eijk | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9453256 | Van Eijk | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9493820 | Van Eijk | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9506061 | Brown et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9512422 | Barnard et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9574230 | Van Eijk | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9593365 | Frisen et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9598728 | Barany et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9657335 | Van Eijk | May 2017 | B2 |
9670542 | Van Eijk | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9702004 | Van Eijk | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9727810 | Fodor et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9745627 | Van Eijk | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9777324 | Van Eijk | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9783841 | Nolan et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9816134 | Namsaraev | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9834814 | Peter et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9850536 | Oliphant et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9856521 | Stevens et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9868979 | Chee et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9879313 | Chee et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9896721 | Van Eijk | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9898576 | Van Eijk | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9898577 | Van Eijk | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9902991 | Sinicropi et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9938566 | Shepard et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9957550 | Yeakley et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10002316 | Fodor et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10023907 | Van Eijk | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10030261 | Frisen et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10041949 | Bendall et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10059989 | Giresi et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10059990 | Boyden et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10095832 | Van Eijk | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10144966 | Cantor | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10208982 | Bannish et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10273541 | Hindson et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10472669 | Chee | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10480022 | Chee | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10480029 | Bent et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10494667 | Chee | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10550429 | Harada et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10633648 | Seelig et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10724078 | Van Driel et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10774372 | Chee et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10774374 | Frisen et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10787701 | Chee | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10829803 | Terbrueggen et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10913975 | So et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10914730 | Chee et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10927403 | Chee et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
11008607 | Chee | May 2021 | B2 |
11046996 | Chee et al. | Jun 2021 | B1 |
11067567 | Chee | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11118216 | Koshinsky et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11156603 | Chee | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11162132 | Frisen et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11208684 | Chee | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11286515 | Chee et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11293917 | Chee | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11299774 | Frisen et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11313856 | Chee | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11332790 | Chell et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11352659 | Frisen et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11359228 | Chee et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11365442 | Chee | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11371086 | Chee | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11384386 | Chee | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11390912 | Frisen et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11401545 | Chee | Aug 2022 | B2 |
20010055764 | Empendocles et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020040275 | Cravatt | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055100 | Kawashima | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058250 | Firth | May 2002 | A1 |
20020086441 | Baranov et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020164611 | Bamdad | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030017451 | Wang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022207 | Balasubramanian | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030064398 | Barnes | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030138879 | Lambalot | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030148335 | Shen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030162216 | Gold | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030165948 | Alsmadi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030224419 | Corcoran | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232348 | Jones et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232382 | Brennan | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040033499 | Ilsley et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040067492 | Peng et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082059 | Webb et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096853 | Mayer | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106110 | Balasubramanian | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040235103 | Reznikoff et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040248325 | Bukusoglu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259105 | Fan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050003431 | Wucherpfennig | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050037393 | Gunderson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050048580 | Labaer | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064460 | Holliger et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050100900 | Kawashima et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050130173 | Leamon et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136414 | Gunderson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050164292 | Farooqui | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050191656 | Drmanac et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050191698 | Chee et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202433 | Van Beuningen | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227271 | Kwon | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050260653 | LaBaer | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050266417 | Barany et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060046313 | Roth | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084078 | Zhao | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105352 | Qiao et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060188901 | Barnes et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060199183 | Valat et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060211001 | Yu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216775 | Burkart et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060240439 | Smith et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060263789 | Kincaid | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060275782 | Gunderson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060281109 | Barr Ost et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070020640 | McCloskey et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020669 | Ericsson | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070026430 | Andersen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070054288 | Su et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070087360 | Boyd | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070099208 | Drmanac et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070128624 | Gormley et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070128656 | Agrawal | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070134723 | Kozlov et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070161020 | Luo et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070166705 | Milton et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070172873 | Brenner et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070207482 | Church et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070254305 | Paik et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070269805 | Hogers | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080003586 | Hyde et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080009420 | Schroth et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080108082 | Rank et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080108804 | Hayashizaki et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132429 | Perov et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080160580 | Adessi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080220434 | Thomas | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080261204 | Lexow | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080286795 | Kawashima et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080293046 | Allawi et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090005252 | Drmanac et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006002 | Honisch et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018024 | Church et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090026082 | Rothberg et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036323 | van Eijk et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090082212 | Williams | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099041 | Church et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105959 | Braverman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090117573 | Fu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090127589 | Rothberg et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090155781 | Drmanac et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090170713 | van Eijk et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090233802 | Bignell et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090253581 | van Eijk et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090283407 | Van Eijk | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090291854 | Weisinger-Mayr et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090312193 | Kim et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100035249 | Hayashizaki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100069263 | Shendure et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100105052 | Drmanac et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100120097 | Matz et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100120098 | Grunenwald et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100129874 | Mitra et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100145037 | Brive et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100173384 | Johnsson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100184618 | Namsaraev et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100210475 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100227329 | Cuppens | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100273219 | May et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110028685 | Purkayastha et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110033854 | Drmanac et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110045462 | Fu et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110059436 | Hardin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110111409 | Sinicropi et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110152111 | Illumina | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110245101 | Chee et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110245111 | Chee | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110287435 | Grunenwald et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120021930 | Schoen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120046175 | Rodesch et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120046178 | Van Den Boom et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120065081 | Chee | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120135871 | van Eijk et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120202698 | van Eijk et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120202704 | Fan et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220479 | Ericsson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120252702 | Muratani et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120258871 | Kozlov et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120289414 | Mitra et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130005594 | Terbrueggen et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130005600 | Olek | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130035239 | Kong et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130079232 | Kain et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130171621 | Luo et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130244884 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130261019 | Lin et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130338042 | Shen et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140066318 | Frisen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140121118 | Warner | May 2014 | A1 |
20140274731 | Raymond et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140323330 | Glezer et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140342921 | Weiner | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150000854 | Gann-Fetter et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20160019337 | Roberts et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160024576 | Chee | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160108458 | Frei et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160122817 | Jarosz et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160138091 | Chee et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160145677 | Chee et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160194692 | Gore et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160253584 | Fodor et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160289740 | Fu et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160298180 | Chee | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160333403 | Chee | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170016053 | Beechem et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170029875 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170058339 | Chee | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170058340 | Chee | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170058345 | Chee | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170067096 | Wassie et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170088881 | Chee | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170089811 | Tillberg et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170166962 | van Eijk et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170220733 | Zhuang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170233722 | Seelig et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170241911 | Rockel et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170335410 | Driscoll et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170349940 | Morin et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180051322 | Church et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180057873 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180094316 | Oliphant et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180112261 | Van Driel et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180163265 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180179591 | van Eijk | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180201925 | Steemers et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180201980 | Chee et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180208967 | Larman et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180216161 | Chen et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180237864 | Imler et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180245142 | So et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180247017 | van Eijk et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180291439 | van Eijk et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180305681 | Jovanovich et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180312822 | Lee et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190055594 | Samusik et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190085383 | Church et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190145982 | Chee et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190161796 | Hauling et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190177777 | Chee | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190177778 | Chee | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190177789 | Hindson et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190194709 | Church et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190203275 | Frisen et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190218276 | Regev et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190233880 | Mir | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190262831 | West et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190264268 | Frisen et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190271030 | Chee | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190271031 | Chee | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190300943 | Chee et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190300944 | Chee et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190300945 | Chee et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190309353 | Chee | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190309354 | Chee | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190309355 | Chee | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190323071 | Chee | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190330617 | Church et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190360043 | Pham et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190367969 | Belhocine et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200010891 | Beechem et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200024641 | Nolan et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200048690 | Chee | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200063195 | Chee | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200063196 | Chee | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200080136 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200109443 | Chee | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200199565 | Chen et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200199572 | Kuersten et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200224244 | Nilsson et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200239874 | Mikkelsen | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200239946 | Dewal | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200256867 | Hennek et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200277663 | Iyer | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200277664 | Frenz | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200283852 | Oliphant et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200299757 | Chee et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200325531 | Chee | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200370095 | Farmer et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200399687 | Frisen et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200407781 | Schnall-Levin | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210010068 | Chee et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210010070 | Schnall-Levin et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210095331 | Fan et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210123040 | Macosko et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210140982 | Uytingco et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210150707 | Weisenfeld et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210155982 | Yin et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210158522 | Weisenfeld et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210172007 | Chee et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210189475 | Tentori et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210198741 | Williams | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210199660 | Williams et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210207202 | Chee | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210214785 | Stoeckius | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210222235 | Chee | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210222241 | Bharadwaj | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210222242 | Ramachandran Iyer | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210222253 | Uytingco | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210223227 | Stoeckius | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210230584 | Mikkelsen et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210230681 | Patterson et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210230692 | Daugharthy et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210238664 | Bava et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210238675 | Bava | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210238680 | Bava | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210247316 | Bava | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210255175 | Chee et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210262018 | Bava et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210262019 | Alvarado Martinez et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210269864 | Chee | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210270822 | Chee | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210285036 | Yin et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210285046 | Chell et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210292748 | Frisen et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210292822 | Frisen et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210317510 | Chee et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210317524 | Lucero et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210324457 | Ramachandran Iyer et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210332424 | Schnall-Levin | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210332425 | Pfeiffer et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210348221 | Chell et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20220002791 | Frisen et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220003755 | Chee | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220010367 | Ramachandran Iyer et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220017951 | Ramachandran Iyer et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220025446 | Shah | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220025447 | Tentori et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220033888 | Schnall-Levin et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220049293 | Frenz et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220064630 | Bent et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220081728 | Williams | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220090058 | Frisen et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220090175 | Uytingco et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220090181 | Gallant et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220098576 | Dadhwal | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220106632 | Galonska et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220106633 | Engblom et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220112486 | Ramachandran Iyer et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220112545 | Chee | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220119869 | Ramachandran Iyer et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220127659 | Frisen et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220127666 | Katiraee et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220127672 | Stoeckius | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220145361 | Frenz et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220154255 | Chee et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220170083 | Khaled et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220195422 | Gallant et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220195505 | Frisen et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220196644 | Chee | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220213526 | Frisen et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20220241780 | Tentori et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1680604 | Oct 2005 | CN |
101221182 | Jul 2008 | CN |
108949924 | Dec 2018 | CN |
1782737 | May 2007 | EP |
1910562 | Apr 2008 | EP |
1923471 | May 2008 | EP |
2002017 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2292788 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2302070 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2881465 | Jun 2015 | EP |
3013984 | May 2016 | EP |
3511423 | Jul 2019 | EP |
3541956 | Sep 2019 | EP |
2007-014297 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2007-074967 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2009-036694 | Feb 2009 | JP |
WO 1989010977 | Nov 1989 | WO |
WO 1991006678 | May 1991 | WO |
WO 1995023875 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 1995025116 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 1995035505 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 1997031256 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 200017390 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 200106012 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 2001009363 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 2001042796 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 2001090415 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 2001096608 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 2002059355 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 2002059364 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 2002077283 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2003002979 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2003008538 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2003010176 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 2003102233 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004015080 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004067759 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2005007814 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005010145 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005026387 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005042759 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005113804 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006020515 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006124771 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007041689 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007060599 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007073171 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007076726 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007139766 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2007145612 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008069906 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2009032167 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009152928 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2010019826 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2010027870 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010126614 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 2011008502 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011062933 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2011068088 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2012049316 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012071428 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2012129242 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012159089 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 2013123442 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO 2013138510 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 2013142389 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 2013150082 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2013150083 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2014044724 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO 2014144713 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO 2014152397 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO 2014210223 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO 2014210225 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO 2015161173 | Oct 2015 | WO |
WO 2016138496 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO 2016138500 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO 2016166128 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO 2016168825 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO 2016172362 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO 2017019456 | Feb 2017 | WO |
WO 2017019481 | Feb 2017 | WO |
WO 2017075293 | May 2017 | WO |
WO 2017096158 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO 2017156336 | Sep 2017 | WO |
WO 2017184984 | Oct 2017 | WO |
WO 2017192633 | Nov 2017 | WO |
WO 2018023068 | Feb 2018 | WO |
WO 2018045181 | Mar 2018 | WO |
WO 2018064640 | Apr 2018 | WO |
WO 2018085599 | May 2018 | WO |
WO 2018091676 | May 2018 | WO |
WO 2018136856 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO 2018144582 | Aug 2018 | WO |
WO 2018209398 | Nov 2018 | WO |
WO 2019023214 | Jan 2019 | WO |
WO 2019032760 | Feb 2019 | WO |
WO 2019068880 | Apr 2019 | WO |
WO 2019113457 | Jun 2019 | WO |
WO 2019126313 | Jun 2019 | WO |
WO 2019140201 | Jul 2019 | WO |
WO 2019165318 | Aug 2019 | WO |
WO 2019213254 | Nov 2019 | WO |
WO 2019213294 | Nov 2019 | WO |
WO 2020028194 | Feb 2020 | WO |
WO 2020047002 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO 2020047005 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO 2020047010 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO 2020053655 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO 2020056381 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO 2020061064 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO 2020061066 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO 2020061108 | Mar 2020 | WO |
WO 2020076979 | Apr 2020 | WO |
WO 2020112604 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123301 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123305 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123309 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123311 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123316 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123317 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123318 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123319 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO 2020123320 | Jul 2020 | WO |
WO 2020160044 | Aug 2020 | WO |
WO 2020176788 | Sep 2020 | WO |
WO 2020190509 | Sep 2020 | WO |
WO 2020198071 | Oct 2020 | WO |
WO 2020206285 | Oct 2020 | WO |
WO 2020219901 | Oct 2020 | WO |
WO 2020243579 | Dec 2020 | WO |
WO 2021041974 | Mar 2021 | WO |
WO 2021067246 | Apr 2021 | WO |
WO 2021091611 | May 2021 | WO |
WO 2021092433 | May 2021 | WO |
WO 2021097255 | May 2021 | WO |
WO 2021119320 | Jun 2021 | WO |
WO 2021133849 | Jul 2021 | WO |
WO 2021142233 | Jul 2021 | WO |
WO 2021168261 | Aug 2021 | WO |
WO 2021168278 | Aug 2021 | WO |
WO 2021216708 | Oct 2021 | WO |
WO 2021225900 | Nov 2021 | WO |
WO 2021236625 | Nov 2021 | WO |
WO 2021236929 | Nov 2021 | WO |
WO 2021237056 | Nov 2021 | WO |
WO 2021237087 | Nov 2021 | WO |
WO 2021247543 | Dec 2021 | WO |
WO 2021247568 | Dec 2021 | WO |
WO 2021252499 | Dec 2021 | WO |
WO 2021252576 | Dec 2021 | WO |
WO 2021252591 | Dec 2021 | WO |
WO 2021263111 | Dec 2021 | WO |
WO 2022025965 | Feb 2022 | WO |
WO 2022060798 | Mar 2022 | WO |
WO 2022060953 | Mar 2022 | WO |
WO 2022087273 | Apr 2022 | WO |
WO 2022099037 | May 2022 | WO |
WO 2022109181 | May 2022 | WO |
WO 2022140028 | Jun 2022 | WO |
WO 2022147005 | Jul 2022 | WO |
WO 2022147296 | Jul 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chapter 6: Alkaline Hydrolysis, pp. 1-12 from Carcass Disposal: A Comprehensive Review, published on Aug. 2004. |
The definition of “plant fiber”. Printed on Apr. 8, 2022. |
“What pH Levels Are Considered Strong & Weak?” Printed on Aug. 5, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/416,118, filed Oct. 3, 2002, Fan et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/267,363, filed Dec. 7, 2009, Fan et al. |
[No Author Listed], “Proseek® Multiplex 96×96 User Manual,” Olink Proteomics, Olink Bioscience, Uppsala, Sweden, 2017, 20 pages. |
10xGenomics.com, [online], “Visium Spatial Gene Expression Reagent Kits—User Guide,” Jun. 2020, retrieved on May 25, 2021, retrieved from URL<https://assets.ctfassets.net/an68im79xiti/3GGIfH3RWpdlbFVhalpexR/8baa08d9007157592b65b2cdc7130990/CG000239_VisiumSpatialGeneExpression_UserGuide_RevD.pdf>, 69 pages. |
10xGenomics.com, [online], “Visium Spatial Gene Expression Reagent Kits—Tissue Optimization—User Guide,” Jul. 2020, retrieved on May 25, 2021, retrieved from URL<https://assets.ctfassets.net/an68im79xiti/5UJrN0cH17rEk0UXwdl9It/e54d99fb08a8fl500aba503005a04a56/CG000238_VisiumSpatialTissueOptimizationUserGuide_RevD.pdf>, 42 pages. |
10xGenomics.com, [online], “Visium Spatial Gene Expression Reagent Kits—Tissue Optimization,” Nov. 2019, retrieved on Jan. 25, 2022, retrieved from URL<https://assets.ctfassets.net/an68im79xiti/4q03w6959AJFxffSw51ee9/6a2ac61cf6388a72564eeb96bc294967/CG000238_VisiumSpatialTissueOptimizationUserGuide_Rev_A.pdf>, 46 pages. |
Adiconis et al., “Comparative analysis of RNA sequencing methods for degraded or low-input samples,” Nat Methods, Jul. 2013, 10(7):623-9. |
Alam, “Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA),” Curr Protoc Immunol., Nov. 2018, 123(1):e58, 8 pages. |
Andresen et al., “Helicase-dependent amplification: use in OnChip amplification and potential for point-of-care diagnostics,” Expert Rev Mol Diagn., Oct. 2009, 9(7):645-650. |
Aran et al., “xCell: digitally portraying the tissue cellular heterogeneity landscape,” Genome Biol., Nov. 2017, 18(1):220, 14 pages. |
Archer et al., “Selective and flexible depletion of problematic sequences from RNA-seq libraries at the cDNA stage,” BMC Genomics, May 2014, 15(1):401, 9 pages. |
Bartosovic et al., “Single-cell CUT&Tag profiles histone modifications and transcription factors in complex tissues,” Nat Biotechnol., Jul. 2021, 39(7):825-835, Abstract. |
Baugh et al., “Quantitative analysis of mRNA amplification by in vitro transcription,” Nucleic Acids Res., 2001, 29(5):e29, 9 pages. |
Bell, “A simple way to treat PCR products prior to sequencing using ExoSAP-IT,” Biotechniques, 2008, 44(6):834, 1 page. |
Bentley et al., “Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry,” Nature, 2008, 456(7218):53-59. |
Blanco et al., “A practical approach to FRET-based PNA fluorescence in situ hybridization,” Methods, Dec. 2010, 52(4):343-51. |
Bullard et al., “Direct comparison of nick-joining activity of the nucleic acid ligases from bacteriophage T4,” Biochem, J. 2006, 398(1):135-144. |
Burton et al., “Coverslip Mounted-Immersion Cycled in Situ RT-PCR for the Localization of mRNA in Tissue Sections,” Biotechniques, 1998, 24(1):92-100. |
Chen et al., “DNA hybridization detection in a microfluidic Channel using two fluorescently labelled nucleic acid probes,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2008, 23(12):1878-1882. |
Chen et al., “Expansion microscopy,” Science, 2015, 347(6221):543-548. |
Chen et al., “Nanoscale imaging of RNA with expansion microscopy,” Nat Methods, Aug. 2016, 13(8):679-84. |
Chen et al., “RNA imaging. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells,” Science, Apr. 2015, 348(6233):aaa6090, 21 pages. |
Chen et al., “Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells,” Science, 2015, 348(6233):aaa6090, 21 pages. |
Chrisey et al., “Covalent attachment of synthetic DNA to self-assembled monolayer films,” Nucleic Acids Res., Aug. 1996, 24(15):3031-9. |
Corces et al., “An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues,” Nat. Methods, 2017, 14(10):959-962. |
Credle et al., “Multiplexed analysis of fixed tissue RNA using Ligation in situ Hybridization,” Nucleic Acids Research, 2017, 45(14):e128, 9 pages. |
Cujec et al., “Selection of v-abl tyrosine kinase substrate sequences from randomized peptide and cellular proteomic libraries using mRNA display,” Chemistry and Biology, 2002, 9(2):253-264. |
Dahl et al., “Circle-to-circle amplification for precise and sensitive DNA analysis,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2004, 101(13):4548-4553. |
Darmanis et al., “ProteinSeq: High-Performance Proteomic Analyses by Proximity, Ligation and Next Generation Sequencing,” PLos One, 2011, 6(9):e25583, 10 pages. |
Deamer et al., “Characterization of nucleic acids by nanopore analysis,” Acc Chem Res., Oct. 2002, 35(10):817-25. |
Deng et al., “Spatial Epigenome Sequencing at Tissue Scale and Cellular Level,” BioRxiv, Mar. 2021, 40 pages. |
Dressman et al., “Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2003, 100(15):8817-8822. |
Drmanac et al., “CoolMPS™: Advanced massively parallel sequencing using antibodies specific to each natural nucleobase,” BioRxiv, 2020, 19 pages. |
Druley et al., “Quantification of rare allelic variants from pooled genomic DNA,” Nat. Methods, 2009, 6(4):263-65. |
Eberwine, “Amplification of mRNA populations using aRNA generated from immobilized oligo(dT)-T7 primed cDNA,” BioTechniques, 1996, 20(4):584-91. |
Eldridge et al., “An in vitro selection strategy for conferring protease resistance to ligand binding peptides,” Protein Eng Des Sel., 2009, 22(11):691-698. |
Eng et al., “Profiling the transcriptome with RNA SPOTs,” Nat Methods., 2017, 14(12):1153-1155. |
Fire et al., “Rolling replication of short DNA circles,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1995, 92(10):4641-4645. |
Flanigon et al., “Multiplex protein detection with DNA readout via mass spectrometry,” N. Biotechnol., 2013, 30(2):153-158. |
Fluidigm, “Equivalence of Imaging Mass Cytometry and Immunofluorescence on FFPE Tissue Sections,” White Paper, 2017, 12 pages. |
Forster et al., “A human gut bacterial genome and culture collection for improved metagenomic analyses,” Nature Biotechnology, 2019, 37(2):186-192. |
Fu et al., “Repeat subtraction-mediated sequence capture from a complex genome,” Plant J., Jun. 2010, 62(5):898-909. |
Fullwood et al., “Next-generation DNA sequencing of paired-end tags (PET) for transcriptome and genome analyses,” Genome Res., 2009, 19(4):521-532. |
Gao et al., “Q&A: Expansion microscopy”, BMC Biology, 15:50, 9 pages, 2017. |
Gill et al., “Nucleic acid isothermal amplification technologies: a review,” Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids, Mar. 2008, 27(3):224-43. |
Glass et al., “SIMPLE: a sequential immunoperoxidase labeling and erasing method,” J. Histochem. Cytochem., Oct. 2009, 57(10):899-905. |
Gloor, “Gene targeting in Drosophila,” Methods Mol Biol., 2004, 260:97-114. |
Goryshin et al., “Tn5 in vitro transposition,” J Biol Chem., Mar. 1998, 273(13):7367-74. |
Grokhovsky, “Specificity of DNA cleavage by ultrasound,” Molecular Biology, 2006, 40(2):276-283. |
Gu et al., “Protein tag-mediated conjugation of oligonucleotides to recombinant affinity binders for proximity ligation,” N Biotechnol., 2013, 30(2):144-152. |
Gupta et al., “Single-cell isoform RNA sequencing characterizes isoforms in thousands of cerebellar cells,” Nature Biotechnol., Oct. 2018, 36:1197-1202. |
Hahnke et al., “Striptease on glass: validation of an improved stripping procedure for in situ microarrays,” J Biotechnol., Jan. 2007, 128(1):1-13. |
Hardenbol et al., “Highly multiplexed molecular inversion probe genotyping: over 10,000 targeted SNPs genotyped in a single tube assay,” Genome Res., Feb. 2005, 15(2):269-75. |
Hardenbol et al., “Multiplexed genotyping with sequence-tagged molecular inversion probes,” Nature Biotechnol., Jun. 2003, 21(6):673-678. |
He et al., “Printing protein arrays from DNA arrays,” Nature Methods, 2008, 5(2):175-77. |
He, “Cell-free protein synthesis: applications in proteomics and biotechnology,” New Biotechnology, 2008, 25(2-3):126-132. |
Healy, “Nanopore-based single-molecule DNA analysis,” Nanomedicine (Lond), Aug. 2007, 2(4):459-81. |
Hiatt et al., “Parallel, tag-directed assembly of locally derived short sequence reads,” Nature Methods, 2010, 7(2):119-25. |
Ho et al., “Bacteriophage T4 RNA ligase 2 (gp24.1) exemplifies a family of RNA ligases found in all phylogenetic domains,” PNAS, Oct. 2002, 99(20):12709-14. |
Hu et al., “High reproducibility using sodium hydroxide-stripped long oligonucleotide DNA microarrays,” Biotechniques, Jan. 2005, 38(1):121-4. |
Hycultbiotech.com, [online], “Immunohistochemistry, Paraffin” Apr. 2010, retrieved on Apr. 16, 2020, retrieved from URL<https://hycultbiotech.com/media/wysiwyg/Protocol_Immunohistochemistry_Paraffin_2.pdf>, 3 pages. |
Ichikawa et al., “In vitro transposition of transposon Tn3,” J Biol. Chem., Nov. 1990, 265(31):18829-32, Abstract. |
Jamur et al., “Permeabilization of cell membranes.,” Method Mol. Biol., 2010, 588:63-66. |
Jemt et al., “An automated approach to prepare tissue-derived spatially barcoded RNA-sequencing libraries,” Scientific Reports, 2016, 6:37137, 10 pages. |
Kap et al., “Histological assessment of PAXgene tissue fixation and stabilization reagents,” PLoS One, 2011, 6:e27704, 10 pages. |
Kapteyn et al., “Incorporation of non-natural nucleotides into template-switching oligonucleotides reduces background and improves cDNA synthesis from very small RNA samples,” BMC Genomics, Jul. 2010, 11:413, 9 pages. |
Karmakar et al., “Organocatalytic removal of formaldehyde adducts from RNA and DNA bases,” Nature Chemistry, Aug. 3, 2015, 7(9):752-758. |
Kaya-Okur et al., “CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells,” Apr. 2019, 10(1):1930, 10 pages. |
Kennedy-Darling et al., “Measuring the Formaldehyde Protein-DNA Cross-Link Reversal Rate,” Analytical Chemistiy, 2014, 86(12):5678-5681. |
Kent et al., “Polymerase θ is a robust terminal transferase that oscillates between three different mechanisms during end-joining” Elife, Jun. 2016, 5:e13740, 25 pages. |
Kirby et al., “Cryptic plasmids of Mycobacterium avium: Tn552 to the rescue,” Mol Microbiol., Jan. 2002, 43(1):173-86. |
Kleckner et al., “Tn10 and IS10 transposition and chromosome rearrangements: mechanism and regulation in vivo and in vitro,” Curr Top Microbiol Immunol., 1996, 204:49-82. |
Korbel et al., “Paired-end mapping reveals extensive structural variation in the human genome,” Science, 2007, 318(5849):420-426. |
Kozlov et al., “A highly scalable peptide-based assay system for proteomics,” PLoS One, 2012, 7(6):e37441, 10 pages. |
Kozlov et al., “A method for rapid protease substrate evaluation and optimization,” Comb Chem High Throughput Screen, 2006, 9(6):481-87. |
Lage et al., “Whole genome analysis of genetic alterations in small DNA samples using hyperbranched strand displacement amplification and array-CGH,” Genome Research, 2003, 13(2):294-307. |
Lampe et al., “A purified mariner transposase is sufficient to mediate transposition in vitro,” EMBO J., Oct. 1996, 15(19):5470-9. |
Langdale et al., “A rapid method of gene detection using DNA bound to Sephacryl,” Gene, 1985, 36(3):201-210. |
Larman et al., “Sensitive, multiplex and direct quantification of RNA sequences using a modified RASL assay,” Nucleic Acids Research, 2014, 42(14):9146-9157. |
Lee et al., “Fluorescent in situ sequencing (FISSEQ) of RNA for gene expression profiling in intact cells and tissues,” Nature Protocols, 2015, 10(3):442-458. |
Lee et al., “Improving the efficiency of genomic loci capture using oligonucleotide arrays for high throughput resequencing,” BMC Genomics, Dec. 2009, 10:646, 12 pages. |
Li et al., “A photocleavable fluorescent nucleotide for DNA sequencing and analysis,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2003, 100(2):414-419. |
Li et al., “An activity-dependent proximity ligation platform for spatially resolved quantification of active enzymes in single cells,” Nat Commun, Nov. 2017, 8(1):1775, 12 pages. |
Li et al., “RASL-seq for Massively Parallel and Quantitative Analysis of Gene Expression,” Curr Protoc Mol Biol., Apr. 2012, 4(13):1-10. |
Li et al., “Review: a comprehensive summary of a decade development of the recombinase polymerase amplification,” Analyst, Dec. 2018, 144(1):31-67. |
Lin et al., “Highly multiplexed imaging of single cells using a high-throughput cyclic immunofluorescence method,” Nat Commun., Sep. 2015, 6:8390, 7 pages. |
Lovatt et al., “Transcriptome in vivo analysis (TIVA) of spatially defined single cells in live tissue,” Nature Methods, 2013, 11(2):190-196. |
Lund et al., “Assessment of methods for covalent binding of nucleic acids to magnetic beads, Dynabeads, and the characteristics of the bound nucleic acids in hybridization reactions,” Nucleic Acids Res., 1988, 16(22):10861-80. |
Lundberg et al., “High-fidelity amplification using a thermostable DNA polymerase isolated from Pyrococcus furiosus,” Gene, 1991, 108(1):1-6. |
Lundberg et al., “Homogeneous antibody-based proximity extension assays provide sensitive and specific detection of low-abundant proteins in human blood,” Nucleic Acids Res., 2011, 39(15):e102, 8 pages. |
Lundin et al., “Increased throughput by parallelization of library preparation for massive sequencing,” PLoS One, Apr. 2010, 5(4):e10029, 7 pages. |
Lyck et al., “Immunohistochemical markers for quantitative studies of neurons and glia in human neocortex,” J Histochem Cytochem, 2008, 56(3):201-21. |
MacIntyre, “Unmasking antigens for immunohistochemistry.,” Br J Biomed Sci., 2001, 58(3):190-6. |
McCloskey et al., “Encoding PCR products with batch-stamps and barcodes,” Biochem. Genet., 2007, 45(11-12):761-767. |
Meers et al., “Improved CUT&RUN chromatin profiling tools,” Elife, Jun. 2019, 8:e46314, 16 pages. |
Miele et al., “Mapping cis- and trans-chromatin interaction networks using chromosome conformation capture (3C),” Methods Mol Biol., 2009, 464:105-21. |
Morlan et al., “Selective depletion of rRNA enables whole transcriptome profiling of archival fixed tissue,” PLoS One, Aug. 2012, 7(8):e42882, 8 pages. |
Motea et al., “Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase: the story of a misguided DNA polymerase,” Biochim Biophys Acta., May 2010, 1804(5):1151-66. |
Nandakumar et al., “How an RNA Ligase Discriminates RNA versus DNA Damage,” Molecular Cell, 2004, 16:211-221. |
Ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, [online], “Molecular Inversion Probe Assay,” available on or before Oct. 14, 2014, via Internet Archive: Wayback Machine URL<https://web.archive.org/web/20141014124037/https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/probe/docs/techmip/>, retrieved on Jun. 16, 2021, retrieved from URL<https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/probe/docs/techmip/>, 2 pages. |
Ng et al., “Gene identification signature (GIS) analysis for transcriptome characterization and genome annotation,” Nature Methods, 2005, 2(2):105-111. |
Nichols et al., “RNA Ligases,” Curr Protoc Mol Biol., Oct. 2008, 84(1):3.15.1-3.15.4. |
Niklas et al., “Selective permeabilization for the high-throughput measurement of compartmented enzyme activities in mammalian cells,” Anal Biochem, Sep. 2011, 416(2):218-27. |
Ohtsubo et al., “Bacterial insertion sequences,” Curr Top Microbiol Immunol., 1996, 204:1-26. |
Pandey et al., “Inhibition of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase by adenine dinucleotides. Unique inhibitory action of Ap5A,” FEBS Lett., Mar. 1987, 213(1):204-8. |
Park et al., “Single cell trapping in larger micro wells capable of supporting cell spreading and proliferation,” Microfluid Nanofluid, 2010, 8:263-268. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2021/034212, dated Sep. 16, 2021, 16 pages. |
Pellestor et al., “The peptide nucleic acids (PNAs), powerful tools for molecular genetics and cytogenetics,” Eur J Hum Genet., Sep. 2004, 12(9):694-700. |
Picelli et al., “Tn5 transposase and tagmentation procedures for massively scaled sequencing projects,” Genome Res., Dec. 2014, 24(12):2033-40. |
Pipenburg et al., “DNA detection using recombination proteins,” PLoS Biol., Jul. 2006, 4(7):e204, 7 pages. |
Plasterk, “The Tc1/mariner transposon family,” Curr Top Microbiol Immunol., 1996, 204:125-43. |
Plongthongkum et al., “Advances in the profiling of DNA modifications: cytosine methylation and beyond,” Nature Reviews Genetics, Aug. 2014, 15(10):647-661. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/267,363, filed Dec. 7, 2009, 33 pages. |
Raab et al., “Human tRNA genes function as chromatin insulators,” EMBO J., Jan. 2012, 31(2):330-50. |
Reznikoff, “Tn5 as a model for understanding DNA transposition,” Mol Microbiol., Mar. 2003, 47(5):1199-206. |
Ristic et al., “Detection of Protein-Protein Interactions and Posttranslational Modifications Using the Proximity Ligation Assay: Application to the Study of the SUMO Pathway,” Methods Mol. Biol., 2016, 1449:279-90. |
Rodriques et al., “Slide-seq: A scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution,” Science, 2019, 363(6434):1463-1467. |
Roy et al., “Assessing long-distance RNA sequence connectivity via RNA-templated DNA-DNA ligation,” eLife, 2015, 4:e03700, 21 pages. |
Schweitzer et al., “Multiplexed protein profiling on microarrays by rolling-circle amplification,” Nature Biotechnology, Apr. 2002, 20(4):359-365. |
Shelbourne et al., “Fast copper-free click DNA ligation by the ring-strain promoted alkyne-azide cycloaddition reaction,” Chem. Commun., 2011, 47(22):6257-6259. |
Shendure et al., “Accurate multiplex polony sequencing of an evolved bacterial genome,” Science, 2005, 309(5741):1728-1732. |
Simonis et al., “Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C),” Nat Genet., Nov. 2006, 38(11):1348-54. |
Skene et al., “An efficient targeted nuclease strategy for high-resolution mapping of DNA binding sites,” Elife, Jan. 2017, 6:e21856, 35 pages. |
Spitale et al., “Structural imprints in vivo decode RNA regulatory mechanisms,” Nature, 2015, 519(7544):486-90. |
Stoddart et al., “Single-nucleotide discrimination in immobilized DNA oligonucleotides with a biological nanopore,” PNAS USA., May 2009, 106(19):7702-7707. |
Stroh et al., “Quantum dots spectrally distinguish multiple species within the tumor milieu in vivo,” Nat Med., Jun. 2005, 11(6):678-82. |
Taylor et al., “Mitochondrial DNA mutations in human disease,” Nature Reviews Genetics, May 2005, 6(5):389-402. |
Tentori et al., “Detection of Isoforms Differing by a Single Charge Unit in Individual Cells,” Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55(40):12431-5. |
Tian et al., “Antigen peptide-based immunosensors for rapid detection of antibodies and antigens,” Anal Chem, 2009, 81(13):5218-5225. |
Tolbert et al., “New methods for proteomic research: preparation of proteins with N-terminal cysteines for labeling and conjugation,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Jun. 2002, 41(12):2171-4. |
Trejo et al., “Extraction-free whole transcriptome gene expression analysis of FFPE sections and histology-directed subareas of tissue,” PLoS One, Feb. 2019, 14(2):e0212031, 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/416,118 Fan et al., Multiplex Nucleic Acid Analysis Using Archived or Fixed Samples, filed Oct. 3, 2002, 22 pages. |
Vandernoot et al., “cDNA normalization by hydroxyapatite chromatography to enrich transcriptome diversity in RNA-seq applications,” Biotechniques, Dec. 2012, 53(6):373-80. |
Velculescu et al., “Serial analysis of gene expression,” Science, Oct. 1995, 270(5235):484-7. |
Vincent et al., “Helicase-dependent isothermal DNA amplification,” EMBO Rep., Aug. 2004, 5(8):795-800. |
Viollet et al., “T4 RNA ligase 2 truncated active site mutants: improved tools for RNA analysis,” BMC Biotechnol., Jul. 2011, 11:72, 14 pages. |
Waichman et al., “Functional immobilization and patterning of proteins by an enzymatic transfer reaction,” Analytical chemistry, 2010, 82(4):1478-85. |
Wang et al., “Concentration gradient generation methods based on microfluidic systems,” RSC Adv., 2017, 7:29966-29984. |
Wang, “RNA amplification for successful gene profiling analysis,” J Transl Med., Jul. 2005, 3:28, 11 pages. |
Weinreich et al., “Evidence that the cis Preference of the Tn5 Transposase is Caused by Nonproductive Multimerization,” Genes and Development, Oct. 1994, 8(19):2363-2374. |
Wiedmann et al., “Ligase chain reaction (LCR)—overview and applications,” PCR Methods Appl., Feb. 1994, 3(4):S51-64. |
Wilson et al., “New transposon delivery plasmids for insertional mutagenesis in Bacillus anthracis,” J Microbiol Methods, Dec. 2007, 71(3):332-5. |
Wolf et al., “Rapid hybridization kinetics of DNA attached to submicron latex particles,” Nucleic Acids Res, 1987, 15(7):2911-2926. |
Wong et al., “Direct Site-Selective Covalent Protein Immobilization Catalyzed by a Phosphopantetheinyl Transferase,” J. Am. Chem Soc., 2008, 130(37):12456-64. |
Wu et al., “Detection DNA Point Mutation with Rolling-Circle Amplification Chip,” IEEE, 2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Jun. 2010, 4 pages. |
Yeakley et al., “Profiling alternative splicing on fiber-optic arrays,” Nature biotechnology, 2002, 20:353-358. |
Yeakley et al., “A trichostatin A expression signature identified by TempO-Seq targeted whole transcriptome profiling,” PLoS One, May 2017, 12(5):e0178302, 22 pages. |
Yin et al., “Genetically encoded short peptide tag for versatile protein labeling by Sfp phosphopantetheinyl transferase,” PNAS, 2005, 102(44):15815-20. |
Zhang et al., “Archaeal RNA ligase from thermoccocus kodakarensis for template dependent ligation,” RNA Biol., Jan. 2017, 14(1):36-44. |
Zhang et al., “Assembling DNA through Affinity Binding to Achieve Ultrasensitive Protein Detection,” Angew Chem Int Ed Engl., 2013, 52(41):10698-705. |
Zhang et al., “Binding-induced DNA assembly and its application to yoctomole detection of proteins,” Anal Chem, 2012, 84(2):877-884. |
Zhang et al., “Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for ultrasensitive multiplexed microRNA detection using ribonucleotide-modified DNA probes,” Chem. Commun., 2013, 49:10013-10015. |
Zhang et al., “Stripping custom microRNA microarrays and the lessons learned about probe-slide interactions,” Anal Biochem., Mar. 2009, 386(2):222-7. |
Zheng et al., “Origins of human mitochondrial point mutations as DNA polymerase gamma-mediated errors,” Mutat. Res., 2006, 599(1-2):11-20. |
Zhou et al., “Genetically encoded short peptide tags for orthogonal protein labeling by Sfp and AcpS phosphopantetheinyl transferases,” ACS Chemical Biol., 2007, 2(5):337-346. |
Zhu et al., “Reverse transcriptase template switching: a SMART approach for full-length cDNA library construction,” Biotechniques, Apr. 2001, 30(4):892-897. |
Asp et al., “Spatially Resolved Transcriptomes—Next Generation Tools for Tissue Exploration,” Bioessays, Oct. 2020, 42(10):e1900221, 16 pages. |
Balakrishnan et al., “Flap endonuclease 1,” Annu Rev Biochem., Jun. 2013, 82:119-138. |
Bergenstråhle et al., “Seamless integration of image and molecular analysis for spatial transcriptomics workflows,” BMC Genomics, Jul. 2020, 21(1):482, 7 pages. |
Berger el al., “Universal bases for hybridization, replication and chain termination,” Nucleic Acid Res., Aug. 2000, 28(15):2911-2914. |
Blair et al., “Microarray temperature optimization using hybridization kinetics,” Methods Mol Biol., 2009, 529:171-96. |
Bolotin et al., “MiXCR: software for comprehensive adaptive immunity profiling,” Nat Methods., May 2015, 12(5):380-1. |
Chen et al., “Parallel single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping by surface invasive cleavage with universal detection,” Anal Chem., Apr. 2005, 77(8):2400-5. |
Chester et al., “Dimethyl sulfoxide-mediated primer Tm reduction: a method for analyzing the role of renaturation temperature in the polymerase chain reaction.” Anal Biochem, Mar. 1993, 209(2):284-90. |
Ciaccio et al., “Systems analysis of EGF receptor signaling dynamics with microwestern arrays,” Nat Methods, Feb. 2010, 7(2):148-55. |
Gerard et al.. “Excess dNTPs minimize RNA hydrolysis during reverse transcription,” Biotechniques, Nov. 2002, 33(5):984, 986, 988, 990. |
Hessner et al., “Genotyping of factor V G1691A (Leiden) without the use of PCR by invasive cleavage of oligonucleotide probes,” Clin Chem., Aug. 2000, 46(8 Pt 1):1051-6. |
Hoffman et al., “Formaldehyde crosslinking: a tool for the study of chromatin complexes,” J Biol Chem., Oct. 2015, 290(44):26404-11. |
Hughes et al., “Microfluidic Western blotting,” PNAS, Dec. 2012, 109(52):21450-21455. |
Jucá et al., “Effect of dimethyl sulfoxide on reverse transcriptase activity,” Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res., Mar. 1995, 28(3):285-90. |
Kalantari et al., “Deparaffinization of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks using hot water instead of xylene,” Anal Biochem., Aug. 2016, 507:71-3. |
Krzywkowski et al., “Chimeric padlock and iLock probes for increased efficiency of targeted RNA detection,” RNA, Jan. 2019, 25(1):82-89. |
Krzywkowski et al.,, “Fidelity of RNA templated end-joining by chlorella virus DNA ligase and a novel iLock assay with improved direct RNA detection accuracy,” Nucleic Acids Research, Oct. 2017, 45(18):e161, 9pages. |
Lvamichev et al., “Invader assay for SNP genotyping,” Methods Mol Biol., 2003, 212:229-40. |
Lyamichev et al., “Polymorphism identification and quantitative detection of genomic DNA by invasive cleavage of oligonucleotide probes,” Nat Biotechnol., Mar. 1999, 17(3):292-6. |
Nilsson et al., “RNA-templated DNA ligation for transcript analysis,” Nucleic Acids Res., Jan. 2001, 29(2):578-81. |
Olivier, “The Invader assay for SNP genotyping,” Mutat. Res., Jun. 2005, 573(1-2):103-110. |
Penno et al., “Stimulation of reverse transcriptase generated cDNAs with specific indels by template RNA structure: retrotransposon, dNTP balance, RT-reagent usage,” Nucleic Acids Res., Sep. 2017, 45(17):10143-10155. |
Perocchi et al., “Antisense artifacts in transcriptome microarray experiments are resolved by actinomycin D,” Nucleic Acids Res., 2007, 35(19):e128, 7 pages. |
Picelli et al., “Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2,” Nat Protoc., Jan. 2014, 9(1):171-81. |
Schouten et al., “Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification,” Nucleic Acids Res., Jun. 2002, 30(12):e57, 13 pages. |
Singh et al., “High-throughput targeted long-read single cell sequencing reveals the clonal and transcriptional landscape of lymphocytes,” Nat Commun., Jul. 2019, 10(1):3120, 13 pages. |
Sountoulidis et al., “SCRINSHOT, a spatial method for single-cell resolution mapping of cell states in tissue sections,” PLoS Biol., Nov. 2020, 18(11):e3000675, 32 pages. |
Spiess et al., “A highly efficient method for long-chain cDNA synthesis using trehalose and betaine,” Anal. Biochem., Feb. 2002, 301(2):168-74. |
Sutherland et al., “Utility of formaldehyde cross-linking and mass spectrometry in the study of protein-protein interactions,” J. Mass Spectrom., Jun. 2008, 43(6):699-715. |
Toubanaki et al., “Dry-reagent disposable biosensor for visual genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms by oligonucleotide ligation reaction: application to pharmacogenetic analysis,” Hum Mutat., Aug. 2008, 29(8):1071-8. |
Tu et al., “TCR sequencing paired with massively parallel 3′ RNA-seq reveals clonotypic T cell signatures,” Nature Immunology, Dec. 2019, 20(12):1692-1699. |
Vázquez Bernat et al., “High-Quality Library Preparation for NGS-Based Immunoglobulin Germline Gene Inference and Repertoire Expression Analysis,” Front Immunol., Apr. 2019, 10:660, 12 pages. |
Wu et al., “RollFISH achieves robust quantification of single-molecule RNA biomarkers in paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples,” Commun Biol., Nov. 2018, 1:209, 8 pages. |
Yasukawa et al., “Effects of organic solvents on the reverse transcription reaction catalyzed by reverse transcriptases from avian myeloblastosis virus and Moloney murine leukemia virus,” Biosci Biotechnol Biochem., 2010, 74(9):1925-30. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/353,937, filed Mar. 14, 2019, Frisen et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/707,189, filed Mar. 29, 2022, Chell et al. |
Dalma-Weiszhausz et al., “The affymetrix GeneChip platform: an overview,” Methods Enzymol., 2006, 410:3-28. |
Illumina.com [online], “Ribo-Zero® rRNA Removal Kit Reference Guide,” Aug. 2016, retrieved on Apr. 26. 2022, retrieved from URL<https://jp.support.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-support/documents/documentation/chemistry_documentation/ribosomal-depletion/ribo-zero/ribo-zero-reference-guide-15066012-02.pdf>, 36 pages. |
Jensen et al., “Zinc fixation preserves flow cytometry scatter and fluorescence parameters and allows simultaneous analysis of DNA content and synthesis, and intracellular and surface epitopes,” Cytometry A., Aug. 2010, 77(8):798-804. |
Lahiani et al., “Enabling Histopathological Annotations on Immunofluorescent Images through Virtualization of Hematoxylin and Eosin,” J Pathol Inform., Feb. 2018, 9:1, 8 pages. |
Lou et al., “A review of room temperature storage of biospecimen tissue and nucleic acids for anatomic pathology laboratories and biorepositories,” Clin Biochem., Mar. 2014, 47(4-5):267-73. |
Lykidis et al., “Novel zinc-based fixative for high quality DNA, RNA and protein analysis.” Nucleic Acids Res., Jun. 2007, 35(12):e85, 10 pages. |
Miller et al., “Chapter 11—Solid and Suspension Microarrays for Microbial Diagnostics.” Methods in Microbiology, 2015, 42:395-431. |
Nadji et al., “Immunohistochemistry of tissue prepared by a molecular-friendly fixation and processing system,” Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol., Sep. 2005, 13(3):277-82. |
Niedringhaus et al., “Landscape of next-generation sequencing technologies,” Anal Chem., Jun. 2011, 83(12):4327-41. |
Passow et al., “RNAlater and flash freezing storage methods nonrandomly influence observed gene expression in RNAseq experiments,” bioRxiv, Jul. 2018, 28 pages. |
Porreca et al., “Polony DNA sequencing,” Curr Protoc Mol Biol., Nov. 2006, Chapter 7, Unit 7.8, pp. 7.8.1-7.8.22. |
Qiu et al., “Combination probes with intercalating anchors and proximal fluorophores for DNA and RNA detection,” Nucleic Acids Research, Sep. 2016, 44(17):e138, 12 pages. |
Schwers et al., “A high-sensitivity, medium-density, and target amplification-free planar waveguide microarray system for gene expression analysis of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue.” Clin. Chem., Nov. 2009, 55(11):1995-2003. |
Vickovic et al., “SM-Omics: An automated Platform for High-Throughput Spatial Multi-Omics,” bioRxiv, Oct. 2020, 40 pages. |
Wang et al., “Optimization of Process Conditions for Infected Animal Tissues by Alkaline Hydrolysis Technology,” Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2016, 31:366-374. |
Wohnhaas et al., “DMSO cryopreservation is the method of choice to preserve cells for droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing,” Scientific Reports, Jul. 2019, 9(1):10699, 14 pages. |
Zhao et al.,, “Isothermal Amplification of Nucleic Acids,” Chemical Reviews, Nov. 2015, 115(22):12491-12545. |
Burgess, “Spatial transcriptomics coming of age,” Nat Rev Genet., Jun. 2019, 20(6):317, 1 page. |
Ho et al., “Characterization of an ATP-Dependent DNA Ligase Encoded by Chlorella Virus PBCV-1,” Journal of Virology, Mar. 1997, 71(3):1931-1937. |
Hsuih et al., “Novel, Ligation-Dependent PCR Assay for Detection of Hepatitis C Virus in Serum,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Mar. 1996, 34(3):501-507. |
Kumar et al., “Template-directed oligonucleotide strand ligation, covalent intramolecular DNA circularization and catenation using click chemistry,” J Am Chem Soc., May 2007, 129(21):6859-64. |
Nandakumar et al., “RNA Substrate Specificity and Structure-guided Mutational Analysis of Bacteriophage T4 RNA Ligase 2,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, Jul. 2004, 279(30):31337-31347. |
Ozsolak et al., “Digital transcriptome profiling from attomole-level RNA samples,” Genome Res., Apr. 2010, 20(4):519-25. |
Vandenbroucke et al., “Quantification of splice variants using real-time PCR,” Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, 29(13):e68, 7 pages. |
[No Author Listed], “Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3′ Reagent Kits v3.1—User Guide,” 10x Genomics, Document No. CG000204, Nov. 2019, 58 pages. |
[No Author Listed], “Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3′ Reagent Kits v3.1 (Dual Index)—User Guide,” 10x Genomics, Mar. 2021, Document No. CG000315, 61 pages. |
[No Author Listed], “HuSNP Mapping Assay User's Manual,” Affymetrix Part No. 90094 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, Calif.), GeneChip, 2000, 104 pages. |
[No Author Listed], “Microarray technologies have excellent possibilities in genomics-related researches,” Science Tools From Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, 1998, 3(4): 8 pages (with English Translation). |
10xGenomics.com, [online], “Visium Spatial Gene Expression Reagent Kits—Tissue Optimization,” Oct. 2020, retrieved on Dec. 28, 2021, retrieved from URL<https://assets.ctfassets.net/an68im79xiti/5UJrN0cH17rEk0UXwdl9It/e54d99fb08a8f1500aba503005a04a56/CG000238_VisiumSpatialTissueOptimizationUserGuide_RevD.pdf>, 43 pages. |
10xGenomics.com, [online], “Visium Spatial Gene Expression Reagent Kits—User Guide,” Oct. 2020, retrieved on Dec. 28, 2021, retrieved from URL<https://assets.ctfassets.net/an68im79xiti/3GGIfH3RWpd1bFVha1pexR/8baa08d9007157592b65b2cdc7130990/CG000239_VisiumSpatialGeneExpression_UserGuide_RevD.pdf>, 70 pages. |
Adessi et al., “Solid phase DNA amplification: characterisation of primer attachment and amplification mechanisms,” Nucl. Acids Res., 2000, 28(20):E87, 8 pages. |
Affymetrix, “GeneChip Human Genome U133 Set,” retrieved from the Internet: on the World Wide Web at affymetrix.com/support/technical/datasheets/hgu133_datasheet.pdf, retrieved on Feb. 26, 2003, 2 pages. |
Affymetrix, “Human Genome U95Av2,” Internet Citation, retrieved from the internet: on the World Wide Web affymetrix.com, retrieved on Oct. 2, 2002, 1 page. |
Albretsen et al., “Applications of magnetic beads with covalently attached oligonucleotides in hybridization: Isolation and detection of specific measles virus mRNA from a crude cell lysate,” Anal. Biochem., 1990, 189(1):40-50. |
Allawi et al., “Thermodynamics and NMR of Internal GâT Mismatches in DNA,” Biochemistry, 1996, 36(34):10581-10594. |
Armani et al, “2D-PCR: a method of mapping DNA in tissue sections,” Lab Chip, 2009, 9(24):3526-34. |
Atkinson et al., “An Updated Protocol for High Throughput Plant Tissue Sectioning,” Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8:1721, 8 pages. |
Atkinson, “Overview of Translation: Lecture Manuscript,” U of Texas, 2000, DD, pp. 6.1-6.8. |
Bains et al., “A novel method for nucleic acid sequence determination,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1988, 135(3), 303-7. |
Barnes, “PCR amplification of up to 35-kb DNA with high fidelity and high yield from lambda bacteriophage templates,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 1994, 91(6):2216-2220. |
Barnett et al., “ATAC-Me Captures Prolonged DNA Methylation of Dynamic Chromatin Accessibility Loci during Cell Fate Transitions,” Mol Cell., Mar. 2020, 77(6):1350-1364.e6. |
Beattie et al., “Advances in genosensor research,” Clin Chem., May 1995, 41(5):700-6. |
Beechem et al., “High-Plex Spatially Resolved RNA and Protein Detection Using Digital Spatial Profiling: A Technology Designed for Immuno-oncology Biomarker Discovery and Translational Research,” Methods Mol Biol, 2020, Chapter 25, 2055:563-583. |
Birney et al., “Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project,” Nature, 2007, 447(7146):799-816. |
Blanchard et al., “High-density oligonucleotide arrays,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 1996, 11(6-7):687-690. |
Blokzijl et al., “Profiling protein expression and interactions: proximity ligation as a tool for personalized medicine,” J Intern. Med., 2010, 268(3):232-245. |
Blow, “Tissue Issues,” Nature, 2007, 448(7156):959-962. |
Brandon et al., “Mitochondrial mutations in cancer,” Oncogene, 2006, 25(34):4647-4662. |
Brenner et al., “Gene expression analysis by massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) on microbead arrays,” Nat. Biotech., 2000, 18(6):630-634. |
Brenner et al., “In vitro cloning of complex mixtures of DNA on microbeads: physical separation of differentially expressed cDNAs,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2000, 97(4):1665-1670. |
Brow, “35—The Cleavase I enzyme for mutation and polymorphism scanning,” PCR Applications Protocols for Functional Genomics, 1999, pp. 537-550. |
Brown et al., “Retroviral integration: structure of the initial covalent product and its precursor, and a role for the viral IN protein,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, Apr. 1989, 86(8):2525-9. |
Buenrostro et al., “Transposition of native chromatin for multimodal regulatory analysis and personal epigenomics,” Nat Methods, Dec. 2013, 10(12):1213-1218. |
Burgess, “A space for transcriptomics,” Nature Reviews Genetics, 2016, 17(8):436-7. |
Burgess, “Finding structure in gene expression,” Nature Reviews Genetics, 2018, 19(5):249, 1 page. |
Cha et al., “Specificity, efficiency, and fidelity of PCR,” Genome Res., 1993, 3(3):S18-29. |
Chandra et al., “Cell-free synthesis-based protein microarrays and their applications,” Proteomics, 2009, 5(6):717-30. |
Chatterjee et al., “Mitochondrial DNA mutations in human cancer. Oncogene,” 2006, 25(34):4663-4674. |
Chen et al., “Spatial Transcriptomics and In Situ Sequencing to Study Alzheimer's Disease,” Cell, Aug. 2020, 182(4):976-991. |
Chen et al., “μCB-seq: microfluidic cell barcoding and sequencing for high-resolution imaging and sequencing of single cells,” Lab Chip, Nov. 2020, 20(21):3899-3913. |
Constantine et al., “Use of genechip high-density oligonucleotide arrays for gene expression monitoring,” Life Sceience News, Amersham Life Science, 1998, pp. 11-14. |
Crosetto et al., “Spatially resolved transcriptomics and beyond,” Nature Review Genetics, 2015, 16(1):57-66. |
Cruz et al., “Methylation in cell-free DNA for early cancer detection,” Ann Oncol., Jun. 2018, 29(6):1351-1353. |
Czarnik, “Encoding methods for combinatorial chemistry,” Curr Opin Chem Biol., Jun. 1997, 1(1):60-6. |
Daubendiek et al., “Rolling-Circle RNA Synthesis: Circular Oligonucleotides as Efficient Substrates for T7 RNA Polymerase,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117(29):7818-7819. |
Davies et al., “How best to identify chromosomal interactions: a comparison of approaches,” Nat. Methods, 2017, 14(2):125-134. |
Dean et al., “Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification,” Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2002, 99(8):5261-66. |
Duncan et al., “Affinity chromatography of a sequence-specific DNA binding protein using Teflon-linked oligonucleotides,” Anal. Biochem., 1988, 169(1):104-108. |
Eguiluz et al., “Multitissue array review: a chronological description of tissue array techniques, applications and procedures,” Pathology Research and Practice, 2006, 202(8):561-568. |
Ellington et al., “Antibody-based protein multiplex platforms: technical and operational challenges,” Clin Chem, 2010, 56(2):186-193. |
Fodor et al., “Light-directed, spatially addressable parallel chemical synthesis,” Science, 1995, 251(4995):767-773. |
Frese et al., “Formylglycine aldehyde Tag—protein engineering through a novel post-translational modification,” ChemBioChem., 2009, 10(3):425-27. |
Fu et al., “Counting individual DNA molecules by the stochastic attachment of diverse labels,” PNAS, 2011, 108(22):9026-9031. |
Fu et al., “Continuous Polony Gels for Tissue Mapping with High Resolution and RNA Capture Efficiency,” bioRxiv, 2021, 20 pages. |
Ganguli et al., “Pixelated spatial gene expression analysis from tissue,” Nat Commun., Jan. 2018, 9(1):202, 9 pages. |
Gene@arrays[online], BeadArray Technology, available on or before Feb. 14, 2015, via Internet Archive: Wayback Machine URL <https://web.archive.org/web/20150214084616/http://genearrays.com/services/microarrays/illumina/beadarray-technology/>, [retrieved on Jan. 30, 2020], 3 pages. |
Gnanapragasam, “Unlocking the molecular archive: the emerging use of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for biomarker research in urological cancer,” BJU International, 2009, 105(2):274-278. |
Goldkorn et al., “A simple and efficient enzymatic method for covalent attachment of DNA to cellulose. Application for hybridization-restriction analysis and for in vitro synthesis of DNA probes,” Nucleic Acids Res., 1986, 14(22):9171-9191. |
Gracia Villacampa et al., “Genome-wide Spatial Expression Profiling in FFPE Tissues,” bioRxiv, 2020, pp. 38 pages. |
Gunderson et al., “Decoding randomly ordered DNA arrays,” Genome Research, 2004, 14(5):870-877. |
Guo et al., “Direct fluorescence analysis of genetic polymorphisms by hybridization with oligonucleotide arrays on glass supports,” Nucleic Acids Res., Dec. 1994, 22(24):5456-65. |
Hamaguchi et al., “Direct reverse transcription-PCR on oligo(dT)-immobilized polypropylene microplates after capturing total mRNA from crude cell lysates,” Clin Chem., Nov. 1998, 44(11):2256-63. |
Hayes et al., “Electrophoresis of proteins and nucleic acids: I-Theory,” BMJ, Sep. 1989, 299(6703):843-6. |
He et al., “In situ synthesis of protein arrays,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2008, 19(1):4-9. |
Hejatko et al., “In situ hybridization technique for mRNA detection in whole mount Arabidopsis samples,” Nature Protocols, 2006, 1(4):1939-1946. |
Ke et al., “In situ sequencing for RNA analysis in preserved tissue and cells,” Nat Methods., Sep. 2013, Supplementary Materials, 29 pages. |
Kristensen et al., “High-Throughput Methods for Detection of Genetic Variation,” BioTechniques, Feb. 2001, 30(2):318-332. |
Kurz et al., “cDNA—protein fusions: covalent protein-gene conjugates for the in vitro selection of peptides and proteins,” ChemBioChem., 2001, 2(9):666-72. |
Kwok, “High-throughput genotyping assay approaches,” Pharmocogenomics, Feb. 2000, 1(1):95-100. |
Landegren et al., “Reading bits of genetic information: methods for single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis,” Genome Res., Aug. 1998, 8(8):769-76. |
Leriche et al., “Cleavable linkers in chemical biology,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 2012, 20:571-582. |
Linnarsson, “Recent advances in DNA sequencing methods—general principles of sample preparation,” Experimental Cell Research, 2010, 316(8):1339-1343. |
Liu et al., “High-Spatial-Resolution Multi-Omics Atlas Sequencing of Mouse Embryos via Deterministic Barcoding in Tissue,” BioRxiv, 2019, 55 pages. |
Lizardi et al., “Mutation detection and single-molecule counting using isothermal rolling-circle amplification,” Nat. Genet., 1998, 19(3):225-232. |
Lundberg et al., “Multiplexed homogeneous proximity ligation assays for high-throughput protein biomarker research in serological material,” Mol Cell Proteomics, 2011, 10(4):M110.004978, 11 pages. |
MacBeath et al., “Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination,” Science, Sep. 2000, 289(5485):1760-1763. |
Marx, “Method of the Year: spatially resolved transcriptomics,” Nature Methods, 2021, 18(1):9-14. |
Merritt et al., “Multiplex digital spatial profiling of proteins and RNA in fixed tissue,” Nat Biotechnol, May 2020, 38(5):586-599. |
Metzker, “Sequencing technologies—the next generation,” Nature Reviews Genetics, 2010, 11(1):31-46. |
Miller et al., “Basic concepts of microarrays and potential applications in clinical microbiology,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 2009, 22(4):611-633. |
Miner et al., “Molecular barcodes detect redundancy and contamination in hairpin-bisulfite PCR,” Nucleic Acids Res., Sep. 2004, 32(17):e135, 4 pages. |
Mishra et al., “Three-dimensional genome architecture and emerging technologies: looping in disease,” Genome Medicine, 2017, 9(1):87, 14 pages. |
Mitra et al., “Digital genotyping and haplotyping with polymerase colonies,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, May 2003, 100(10):5926-5931. |
Mizusawa et al., “A bacteriophage lambda vector for cloning with BamHI and Sau3A,” Gene, 1982, 20(3):317-322. |
Nikiforov et al., “The use of 96-well polystyrene plates for DNA hybridization-based assays: an evaluation of different approaches to oligonucleotide immobilization,” Anal Biochem, May 1995, 227(1):201-9. |
Nowak et al., “Entering the Postgenome Era,” Science, 1995, 270(5235):368-71. |
Pemov et al., “DNA analysis with multiplex microarray-enhanced PCR,” Nucl. Acids Res., Jan. 2005, 33(2):e11, 9 pages. |
Perler et al., “Intervening sequences in an Archaea DNA polymerase gen,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, Jun. 1992, 89(12):5577-5581. |
Petterson et al., “Generations of sequencing technologies,” Genomics, 2009, 93(2):105-111. |
Polsky-Cynkin et al., “Use of DNA immobilized on plastic and agarose supports to detect DNA by sandwich hybridization,” Clin. Chem., 1985, 31(9):1438-1443. |
Ranki et al., “Sandwich hybridization as a convenient method for the detection of nucleic acids in crude samples,” Gene, 1983, 21(1-2):77-85. |
Reinartz et al., “Massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) as a tool for in-depth quantitative gene expression profiling in all organisms,” Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, Feb. 2002, 1(1):95-104. |
Ronaghi et al., “A sequencing method based on real-time pyrophosphate,” Science, Jul. 1998, 281(5375):363-365. |
Ronaghi et al., “Real-time DNA sequencing using detection of pyrophosphate release,” Analytical Biochemistry, Nov. 1996, 242(1):84-89. |
Ronaghi, “Pyrosequencing sheds light on DNA sequencing,” Genome Res, Jan. 2001, 11(1):3-11. |
Salmén et al., “Barcoded solid-phase RNA capture for Spatial Transcriptomics profiling in mammalian tissue sections,” Nature Protocols, Oct. 2018, 13(11):2501-2534. |
Saxonov et al., “10x Genomics, Mastering Biology to Advance Human Health,” PowerPoint, 10x, 2020, 41 pages. |
Schena et al., “Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray,” Science, Oct. 1995, 270(5235):467-470. |
Shalon et al., “A DNA microarray system for analyzing complex DNA samples using two-color fluorescent probe hybridization,” Genome Res., Jul. 1996, 6(7):639-45. |
Stahl et al., “Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics,” Science, Jun. 2016, 353(6294):78-82. |
Stahl et al., “Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics,” Supplementary Materials, Science, Jul. 2016, 353(6294):78-82, 41 pages. |
Stimpson et al., “Real-time detection of DNA hybridization and melting on oligonucleotide arrays by using optical wave guides,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, Jul. 1995, 92(14):6379-83. |
Strell et al., “Placing RNA in context and space—methods for spatially resolved transcriptomics,” The FEBS Journal, 2019, 286(8):1468-1481. |
Tijssen et al., “Overview of principles of hybridization and the strategy of nucleic acid assays” in Techniques in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology—Hybridization with Nucleic Acid Probes, 1993, 24(Chapter 2), 65 pages. |
Twyman et al., “Techniques Patents for SNP Genotyping,” Pharmacogenomics, Jan. 2003, 4(1):67-79. |
Van Gelder et al., “Amplified RNA synthesized from limited quantities of heterogeneous cDNA,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1990, 87(5):1663-1667. |
Vasiliskov et al., “Fabrication of microarray of gel-immobilized compounds on a chip by copolymerization,” Biotechniques, Sep. 1999, 27(3):592-606. |
Vickovic et al., “High-definition spatial transcriptomics for in situ tissue profiling,” Nat Methods, Oct. 2019, 16(10):987-990. |
Vogelstein et al., “Digital PCR,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Aug. 1999, 96(16):9236-9241. |
Walker et al., “Strand displacement amplification—an isothermal, in vitro DNA amplification technique,” Nucleic Acids Research, 1992, 20(7):1691-1696. |
Wang et al., “Imaging-based pooled CRISPR screening reveals regulators of lncRNA localization,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, May 2019, 116(22):10842-10851. |
Wang et al., “Tagmentation-based whole-genome bisulfite sequencing,” Nature Protocols, Oct. 2013, 8(10):2022-2032. |
Wang et al., “High-fidelity mRNA amplification for gene profiling,” Nature Biotechnology, Apr. 2000, 18(4):457-459. |
Worthington et al., “Cloning of random oligonucleotides to create single-insert plasmid libraries,” Anal Biochem, 2001, 294(2):169-175. |
Yershov et al., “DNA analysis and diagnostics on oligonucleotide microchips,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, May 1996, 93(10):4913-4918. |
Caliari et al., “Apractical guide to hydrogels for cell culture,” Nat Methods., Apr. 2016, 13(5):405-14. |
Hanauer et al., “Separation of nanoparticles by gel electrophoresis according to size and shape,” Nano Lett., Sep. 2007, 7(9):2881-5. |
Ulery et al., “Biomedical Applications of Biodegradable Polymers,” J Polym Sci B Polym Phys., Jun. 2011, 49(12):832-864. |
Amidzadeh et al., “Assessment of different permeabilization methods of minimizing damage to the adherent cells for detection of intracellular RNA by flow cytometry,” Avicenna J Med Biotechnol., Jan. 2014, 6(1):38-46. |
Boulé et al., “Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase indiscriminately incorporates ribonucleotides and deoxyribonucleotides,” J Biol Chem., Aug. 2001, 276(33):31388-93. |
Evers et al., “The effect of formaldehyde fixation on RNA: optimization of formaldehyde adduct removal,” J Mol Diagn., May 2011, 13(3):282-8. |
Gansauge et al., “Single-stranded DNA library preparation from highly degraded DNA using T4 DNA ligase,” Nucleic Acids Res., Jun. 2017, 45(10):e79, 10 pages. |
Hafner et al., “Identification of microRNAs and other small regulatory RNAs using cDNA library sequencing,” Methods, Jan. 2008, 44(1):3-12. |
Miura et al., “Highly efficient single-stranded DNA ligation technique improves low-input whole-genome bisulfite sequencing by post-bisulfite adaptor tagging,” Nucleic Acids Res., Sep. 2019, 47(15):e85, 10 pages. |
Slomovic et al., “Addition of poly(A) and poly(A)-rich tails during RNA degradation in the cytoplasm of human cells,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, Apr. 2010, 107(16):7407-12 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220098661 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63041481 | Jun 2020 | US | |
63030190 | May 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2021/034212 | May 2021 | US |
Child | 17548047 | US |