In a production process at a wellbore, formation fluid containing hydrocarbons and water is drawn from a downhole formation into a production tubing and lifted uphole to a surface location. Inorganic scale-forming constituents such as calcium, magnesium, etc. are often present in the water and hydrocarbons. These scales tend to precipitate at various locations on the tubing, eventually limiting production from the wellbore. In order to prevent the formation of the scale, scale inhibitor is pumped into the fluid at a downhole location at a level determined from measurements of water sample chemistry and operation parameters of a production process.
Due to technical difficulties, it is impractical to place a scale sensor in a production well. However, scale measurements at a surface location do not take into account differences between the environmental conditions downhole vs. at a surface location that have an effect on the risk of scale precipitation. Therefore, there is a need to be able to determine scale parameters downhole that account for differences in environmental conditions between surface and downhole locations.
In a method of preventing scale in a well includes receiving a fluid at a second location in fluid communication with a first location; measuring, via a sensor at the second location, scale deposition in the fluid and a value of a fluid parameter; determining, from the scale deposition at the second location and the fluid parameter at the second location, scale deposition at the first location; and injecting a scale inhibitor at the first location based on the determined scale deposition at the first location.
A system for scale prevention includes a conduit for fluid communication between a first location and a second location; a sensor at the second location configured to measure scale deposition in the fluid and a value of a fluid parameter; and a processor configured to: determine, from the scale deposition at the second location and the value of the fluid parameter at the second location, scale deposition at the first location, and inject a scale inhibitor at the first location based on the determined scale deposition.
The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:
A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the disclosed apparatus and method are presented herein by way of exemplification and not limitation with reference to the Figures.
Sensor 120 is in communication with a control unit 122 and sends the scale measurements and at least one of the measurements of the additional fluid parameter to the control unit 122. The control unit 122 determines the likelihood of scale precipitation in the wellbore from the scale measurements and the measured additional fluid parameters, as discussed below with respect to
The control unit 122 is in communication with an injection unit 130 that can be an injection pump. The injection unit 130 pumps a scale inhibitor 132 from a storage tank 134 to the wellbore 105 via a capillary tube 136 that extends along the production tubing 102, or can be injected at the surface into the tubing casing annulus where it is effectively carried down the surface by gas lift injection gas or even gravity. The control unit 122 controls the pumping rate of injection unit 130 to deliver an amount of scale inhibitor 132 that is determined by the processor 124 based on a calculated amount of downhole scale volume determined by the processor 124. The injection location of the scale inhibitor can be at the location at which the fluid 110 enters the production tubing 104. In other embodiment, the scale inhibitor can be injected into the formation surrounding the entry point of the production tubing 104 via the temporary injection at the surface of a significant volume of scale inhibitor displaced down the wellbore and into the formation by a large volume of carrying fluid, in what is often referred to as a “scale squeeze” operation.
The values of the scale measurements and of the fluid parameter at the second location are provided to a model that is at the processor (124,
Using the model, the processor 124 calculates an environmental condition at the first location (e.g., at a downhole location at which fluid flows from the formation in the production tubing). In other words, the model is used to calculate such parameters as scaling risk, based on fluid temperature (T1) at the first location, fluid pressure (P1) at the first location, water cut (WC1) at the first location, fluid pH (pH1) at the first location, salt content of the fluid at the first location, flow rate at the first location, surface roughness, etc. The calculated values of these parameters at the first location can be used (along with the scale measurements obtained at the second location) to determine an amount or concentration of scale in the fluid at the first location. From the calculated amount of scale at the first location, the processor 124 can determine an amount of scale inhibitor to pump to the first location and control the injection unit 130 accordingly.
Returning to
In an alternate embodiment, the control unit 122 can signal the need for scale inhibitor injection downhole via a squeeze operation. In a squeeze operation, a selected amount of scale inhibitor is injected downhole that is estimated to reduce or mitigate the presence of scale in formation fluid for a selected amount time, which can be several months, and a subsequent injection occurs only when scale levels reach a selected amount. The scale inhibitor is injected into the formation at the downhole location to allow the scale inhibitor to reduce scale from forming and precipitating at the downhole location. The amount of scale inhibitor remaining downhole is reflected in scale measurements. The control unit 122 therefore monitors the scale measurements and fluid parameters to predict this scale formation at the downhole location and, when this amount is considered too high, signals the need for a next scale inhibitor squeeze operation.
In another embodiment, the system is used with an injection well or a disposal well in which fluid is being pumped to a downhole location within a formation. In this embodiment, measurements of scale and the fluid parameter are made a surface location and the expected scale is determined or calculated for the downhole location into which the fluid is being pumped. The control unit 122 can then control the injection unit 130 to deliver an appropriate amount of scale inhibitor to this downhole location.
Set forth below are some embodiments of the foregoing disclosure:
A method of preventing scale in a well, comprising: receiving a fluid at a second location in fluid communication with a first location; measuring, via a sensor at the second location, scale deposition in the fluid and a value of a fluid parameter; determining, from the scale deposition at the second location and the fluid parameter at the second location, scale deposition at the first location; and injecting a scale inhibitor at the first location based on the determined scale deposition at the first location.
The method as in any prior embodiment, wherein the parameter includes at least one of: (i) temperature at or near the second location; (ii) pressure at or near the second location; (iii) water cut at or near the second location; (iv) a pH at or near the second location; (v) a salt content at or near the second location; (vi) a flow rate; and a surface roughness at or near the second location.
The method as in any prior embodiment, further comprising determining the scale deposition at the first location from the scale deposition at the second location, the value of the fluid parameter at or near the second location and a transfer model.
The method as in any prior embodiment, further comprising determining the value of the fluid parameter at the first location from the value of the fluid parameter at the second location, and determining the amount of scale at the first location from the value of the fluid parameter at the first location.
The method as in any prior embodiment, further comprising injecting the scale inhibitor via one of: (i) a continuous process; and (ii) a squeeze process.
The method as in any prior embodiment, wherein the further comprising flowing the fluid in one of: (i) from the first location to the second location via a conduit and (ii) from the second location to the first location via the conduit.
The method as in any prior embodiment, further comprising measuring the scale deposition and the value of the fluid parameter at a sensor that is one of: (i) coupled to the conduit; and (ii) coupled to a bypass line of the conduit.
The method as in any prior embodiment, wherein the first location is in the well and the second location is outside of the well.
A system for scale prevention, comprising: a conduit for fluid communication between a first location and a second location; a sensor at the second location configured to measure scale deposition in the fluid and a value of a fluid parameter; and a processor configured to: determine, from the scale deposition at the second location and the value of the fluid parameter at the second location, scale deposition at the first location, and inject a scale inhibitor at the first location based on the determined scale deposition.
The system as in any prior embodiment, wherein the fluid parameter includes at least one of: (i) temperature at or near the second location; (ii) pressure at or near the second location; (iii) water cut at or near the second location; (iv) a pH at or near the second location; (v) a salt content at or near the second location; (vi) a flow rate; and a surface roughness or near the second location.
The system as in any prior embodiment, wherein the processor is further configured to determine the scale deposition at the first location from the scale deposition at the second location, the value of the fluid parameter at the second location and a transfer model.
The system as in any prior embodiment, further comprising an injection unit, wherein the processor controls the injection unit to inject the scale inhibitor via a continuous process.
The system as in any prior embodiment, further comprising a conduit for flowing the fluid in one of: (i) from the first location to the second location and (ii) from the second location to the first location.
The system as in any prior embodiment, wherein the sensor is one of: (i) coupled to the conduit; and (ii) coupled to a bypass line of the conduit.
The system as in any prior embodiment, wherein the first location is in the well and the second location is outside of the well.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. Further, it should be noted that the terms “first,” “second,” and the like herein do not denote any order, quantity, or importance, but rather are used to distinguish one element from another. The modifier “about” used in connection with a quantity is inclusive of the stated value and has the meaning dictated by the context (e.g., it includes the degree of error associated with measurement of the particular quantity).
The teachings of the present disclosure may be used in a variety of well operations. These operations may involve using one or more treatment agents to treat a formation, the fluids resident in a formation, a wellbore, and/or equipment in the wellbore, such as production tubing. The treatment agents may be in the form of liquids, gases, solids, semi-solids, and mixtures thereof. Illustrative treatment agents include, but are not limited to, fracturing fluids, acids, steam, water, brine, anti-corrosion agents, cement, permeability modifiers, drilling muds, emulsifiers, demulsifiers, tracers, flow improvers etc. Illustrative well operations include, but are not limited to, hydraulic fracturing, stimulation, tracer injection, cleaning, acidizing, steam injection, water flooding, cementing, etc.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims. Also, in the drawings and the description, there have been disclosed exemplary embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms may have been employed, they are unless otherwise stated used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention therefore not being so limited.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2729976 | Laub | Jan 1956 | A |
4354553 | Hensley | Oct 1982 | A |
5163321 | Perales | Nov 1992 | A |
6237701 | Kolle et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6375829 | Shevchenko et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6973972 | Aronstam | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7407589 | Holland | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20030024814 | Stetter | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20060254766 | Richard et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070278007 | Krueger et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080067129 | Juenke et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20100294662 | Zheng et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100300684 | Kotsonis et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110046467 | Simpson et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110230741 | Liang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120187000 | Kahn et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130048569 | Ogut et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20150029496 | Duggirala et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20160024915 | Duchene et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160289536 | Koskan et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
203215190 | Sep 2013 | CN |
2017052529 | Mar 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 30, 2019, issued in PCT/US2019/023122. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 6, 2019, issued in PCT/US2019/023298. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 6, 2019, issued in PCT/US2019/023300. |
Images of prior art systems. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190292881 A1 | Sep 2019 | US |