The present disclosure generally relates to turbomachines. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to methods for scaling airfoils for turbomachines.
A steam turbine system generally includes a boiler, a high pressure turbine section, an intermediate turbine section, a low pressure turbine section, and a condenser. A shaft couples the high, intermediate, and low pressure turbine sections. In operation, the boiler heats liquid water into steam. The steam flows through the high, intermediate, and low pressure turbine sections, thereby rotating the one or more shafts. The shaft may be connected, e.g., to a generator to produce electricity. The steam then flows to the condenser, which cools the steam to liquid water. The liquid water is pumped back to the boiler for heating.
Each of the high, intermediate, and low pressure turbine sections may include one or more stages. In particular, each stage includes a row of circumferentially spaced apart stator vanes axially spaced apart from a row of circumferentially spaced apart rotor blades. The stator vanes direct steam flowing through the turbine sections onto the rotor blades, which extract kinetic and/or thermal energy from the steam. In this respect, the force of the steam flowing past the rotor blades causes the shaft to rotate.
Certain parameters of the high, intermediate, and/or low pressure turbine sections are typically determined early in the design process. For example, such parameters may include the number of rows of rotor blades and/or the radial heights and radii of each rotor blade. Nevertheless, the process of designing the rotor blades may be expensive and time consuming, particularly for the rotor blades in the low pressure turbine section. Specifically, extensive testing may be necessary to ensure that the rotor blades exhibit the desired aerodynamic performance and mechanical integrity under expected operating conditions.
Certain scaling methods may allow manufacturers to reuse existing stator vane and/or rotor blade designs without the need for developing a new stator vane and/or rotor blade design. In particular, such scaling methods seek to maintain the aerodynamic performance and mechanical integrity of the existing rotor blade design when the size of the rotor blade increases or decreases. One such method is known in industry as the “speed scaling” method. Using this method, a stator vane or rotor blade designed for use in a turbine operating at a specific rotational speed (e.g., 3600 rpm) may be scaled for use in a turbine operating at a different rotational speed (e.g., 3000 rpm, 1800 rpm, etc.), while maintaining similar aerodynamic performance and mechanical integrity. Specifically, both the radial and the axial dimensions of the scaled stator vanes and/or rotor blades change by a factor of rpm1/rpm2, where rpm1 is the original design speed and rpm2 is the new design speed. In this respect, speed scaling and other known scaling methods do not permit the radial and the axial dimensions of the stator vanes and/or rotor blades to be changed independently. Furthermore, these scaling methods do not permit the scaling of the stator vanes and/or rotor blades based on changes in flow rate when the rotational speed remains constant.
Aspects and advantages of the technology will be set forth in part in the following description, or may be obvious from the description, or may be learned through practice of the technology.
In one aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a method for scaling an airfoil for placement in a turbomachine. The method includes designing a master airfoil having a plurality of master airfoil sections. Each master airfoil section includes a master airfoil section radius and a master airfoil section axial width. One of the plurality of master airfoil sections is selected as a master airfoil reference section. The master airfoil reference section includes a master airfoil reference section radius and a master airfoil reference section axial width. For each of the plurality of master airfoil sections, a ratio of the corresponding master airfoil section radius to the master airfoil reference section radius is calculated. A scaled airfoil reference section radius is determined for a scaled airfoil reference section of a scaled airfoil. The scaled airfoil reference section corresponds to the master airfoil reference section. The scaled airfoil includes a plurality of scaled airfoil sections. Each of the plurality of scaled airfoil sections corresponds to one of the plurality of master airfoil sections. A scaled airfoil section radius is calculated for each of the plurality of scaled airfoil sections. A ratio of the scaled airfoil section radius to the scaled airfoil reference section radius for each of the plurality of scaled airfoil sections is the same as the ratio of the master airfoil section radius to the master airfoil reference section radius for the corresponding master airfoil section.
In a further aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a method for scaling an airfoil for placement in a stage of a turbomachine. The method includes designing a master airfoil having a plurality of master airfoil sections. Each master airfoil section includes a master airfoil section radius and a master airfoil section axial width. One of the plurality of master airfoil sections is selected as a master airfoil reference section. The master airfoil reference section includes a master airfoil reference section radius and a master airfoil reference section axial width. For each of the plurality of master airfoil sections, a ratio of the corresponding master airfoil section radius to the master airfoil reference section radius is calculated. A scaled airfoil reference section radius is determined for a scaled airfoil reference section of a scaled airfoil. The scaled airfoil reference section corresponds to the master airfoil reference section. The scaled airfoil includes a plurality of scaled airfoil sections. Each of the plurality of scaled airfoil sections corresponds to one of the plurality of master airfoil sections. A scaled airfoil section radius is calculated for each of the plurality of scaled airfoil sections. A ratio of the scaled airfoil section radius to the scaled airfoil reference section radius for each of the plurality of scaled airfoil sections is the same as the ratio of the master airfoil section radius to the master airfoil reference section radius for the corresponding master airfoil section. The scaled airfoil is cut at a cut radius.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present technology will become better understood with reference to the following description and appended claims. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the technology and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the technology.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present technology, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended FIGS., in which:
Repeat use of reference characters in the present specification and drawings is intended to represent the same or analogous features or elements of the present technology.
Reference will now be made in detail to present embodiments of the technology, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The detailed description uses numerical and letter designations to refer to features in the drawings. Like or similar designations in the drawings and description have been used to refer to like or similar parts of the technology. As used herein, the terms “first”, “second”, and “third” may be used interchangeably to distinguish one component from another and are not intended to signify location or importance of the individual components. The terms “upstream” and “downstream” refer to the relative direction with respect to fluid flow in a fluid pathway. For example, “upstream” refers to the direction from which the fluid flows, and “downstream” refers to the direction to which the fluid flows.
Each example is provided by way of explanation of the technology, not limitation of the technology. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that modifications and variations can be made in the present technology without departing from the scope or spirit thereof. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment may be used on another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present technology covers such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Although a steam turbine is shown and described herein, the present technology as shown and described herein is not limited to steam turbine unless otherwise specified in the claims. For example, the technology as described herein may be used in any type of turbine including, but not limited to, industrial or land-based gas turbines, aviation gas turbines (e.g., turbofans, etc.), marine gas turbines, and compressors.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein identical numerals indicate the same elements throughout the figures,
Each of the high, intermediate, and low pressure turbine sections 14, 16, 18 may include one or more stages 26, which will be discussed in greater detail below. In the embodiment shown in
During operation, the steam turbine system 10 produces mechanical rotational energy, which may, e.g., be used to generate electricity. More specifically, the boiler 12 heats liquid water 28 to produce steam 30, which flows through the high, intermediate, and low pressure turbine sections 14, 16, 18. One or more rotor blades 32 (
As mentioned above and illustrated in
The rotor blade 32 also includes an airfoil 58 that extends radially outward from the platform 52. In this respect, a root section 60 of the airfoil 58 couples to the platform 52. As shown in
Referring again to
The rotor blade 32 may include a tip shroud 72. Specifically, the tip shroud 72 couples to an airfoil tip 74 (i.e., the radially outermost portion of the airfoil 58) to define the radially outermost portion of the rotor blade 32. As shown in
Furthermore, the rotor blade 32 may also have a part-span shroud 76. In particular, the part-span shroud 76 couples to the airfoil 58 at a position radially between the root section 60 and the airfoil tip 74. The part-span shroud 76 includes a pressure-side portion 78 coupled to the pressure side wall 62 of the airfoil 58 and the suction-side portion 80 coupled to the suction-side wall 64 of the airfoil 58. As shown in
In step 102, the master airfoil 200 is designed. More specifically, the master airfoil 200 includes a profile and/or shape having desired operational characteristics under the expected operating conditions. In this respect, the master airfoil 200 may undergo extensive testing (e.g., flow testing, frequency testing, wheel box testing, etc.) to ensure it exhibits the desired operational characteristics (e.g., flow rates, work coefficient, reaction, velocity triangles, frequencies, etc.) and is suitable for the desired application. The master airfoil 200 may be an electronic model of an airfoil (e.g., a CAD model) or a physical airfoil (e.g., a cast or machined component).
The master airfoil 200 includes a plurality of master airfoil sections. Specifically, each master airfoil section is radially spaced apart from the axial centerline 42 of the shaft 24 as well as each of the other master airfoil sections. In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
As illustrated in
In some embodiments, the master airfoil 200 may be used to form a master stage. Specifically, the master airfoil 200 may be used to form a row (not shown) of master stator vanes (not shown) and a row 224 (
Referring again to
In step 106, a ratio of the master airfoil section radius to the master airfoil reference section radius 234 for each master airfoil section is calculated. In particular, the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth master airfoil section radii 214, 216, 218, 220, 222 are each divided by the master airfoil reference section radius 234 to respectively obtain a first master airfoil section radius ratio, a second master airfoil section radius ratio, a third master airfoil section radius ratio, a fourth master airfoil section radius ratio, and a fifth master airfoil section radius. Preferably, each of the master airfoils 200 has a fifth master airfoil section radius capable of satisfying the requirements for the high pressure, intermediate pressure, and/or low pressure turbine section 14, 16, 18 application for which it is intended.
As mentioned above, the first master airfoil section 204 is the master airfoil reference section 232 in the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
The radials dimensions of the scaled airfoil 202 may be determined in steps 108-112. For clarity, various features and aspects of the scaled airfoil 202 will be described below before discussing steps 108-112.
The scaled airfoil 202 includes a plurality of scaled airfoil sections that each correspond to one of the plurality of master airfoil sections. In this respect, the scaled airfoil 202 generally has the same number of scaled airfoil sections as the master airfoil 200 has master airfoil sections. Like the master airfoil sections, each scaled airfoil section is radially spaced apart from the other scaled airfoil sections. Furthermore, the scaled airfoil sections are generally positioned on the scaled airfoil 202 in a similar manner as the master airfoil sections are positioned on the master airfoil 200. For example, if one of the master airfoil sections is positioned at a root section of the master airfoil 200, then the corresponding scaled airfoil section would be positioned at a root section of the scaled airfoil 202.
In the embodiment shown in
As shown, the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth scaled airfoil sections 236, 238, 240, 242, 244 are respectively spaced apart from the axial centerline 42 by a first scaled airfoil radius 246, a second scaled airfoil radius 248, a third scaled airfoil radius 250, a fourth scaled airfoil radius 252, and a fifth scaled airfoil radius 254. In this respect, the first scaled airfoil section radius 246 corresponds to the first master airfoil section radius 214. The second scaled airfoil section radius 248 corresponds to the second master airfoil section radius 216. The third scaled airfoil section radius 250 corresponds to the third master airfoil section radius 218. The fourth scaled airfoil section radius 252 corresponds to the fourth master airfoil section radius 220. The fifth scaled airfoil section radius 254 corresponds to the fifth master airfoil section radius 222.
Referring again to
The scaled airfoil reference section radius 256 is generally different than the master airfoil reference section radius 234. That is, the scaled airfoil reference section radius 256 is the dimension to which the master airfoil 200 is being radially scaled to create the scaled airfoil 202. As such, step 108 may be performed before steps 104 or 106 in some embodiments.
In step 110, the scaled airfoil section radius is calculated for each of the plurality of scaled airfoil sections. More specifically, each of the scaled airfoil sections includes a scaled airfoil section radius ratio, which is the ratio of the corresponding scaled airfoil section radius to the scaled airfoil reference section radius 256. Each of the scaled airfoil section radius ratios corresponds to one of the master airfoil section radius ratios. In this respect, each of the scaled airfoil section radius ratios is the same as the corresponding master airfoil section radius ratio. As such, the scaled airfoil section radius for each of the scaled airfoil sections may be calculated by multiplying the corresponding scaled airfoil section radius ratio and the scaled airfoil reference section radius. As such, the flow vector diagrams of the master and scaled airfoils 200, 202 remain the same.
As mentioned above, the scaled airfoil 202 includes the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth scaled airfoil sections 236, 238, 240, 242, 244 in the embodiments shown in
In optional step 112, the scaled airfoil 202 may be cut at one or more scaled airfoil cut sections. More specifically, some embodiments of the master airfoil 200 may include master airfoil sections having master airfoil section radius ratios that are greater than a maximum radius ratio or less than a minimum radius ratio of the scaled airfoil 200 after it is cut. The maximum and minimum radius ratios may be based on flow rate or other desired flow characteristics of the scaled airfoil 202. In this respect, the master airfoil 200 may include one or more master airfoil cut sections where the master airfoil section radius ratios are equal to the maximum or minimum radius ratios. In this respect, the scaled airfoil 202 includes the one or more scaled airfoil cut sections, which correspond to the master airfoil cut sections. That is, like the master airfoil cut sections, the scaled airfoil cut sections have scaled airfoil section radius ratios equal to the maximum or minimum radius ratios. In order to maintain desired flow characteristics, the portions of the scaled airfoil 202 having scaled airfoil section radius ratios greater than the maximum radius ratio or less than the minimum radius ration are removed from (i.e., cut off of) the scaled airfoil 202. The scaled airfoil cut radii designates the radial position on the scaled airfoil 202 where this cutting occurs. In general, step 112 occurs after step 110.
In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
Referring again to
For clarity, various axial dimensions of the master and scaled airfoils 200, 202 are described before discussing steps 114A-114H. As mentioned above, the master airfoil 200 includes a plurality of master airfoil sections. In this respect, each master airfoil section includes a master airfoil section axial width. In the embodiment shown in
Referring now to
The scaled airfoil reference section axial width 304 is generally different than the master airfoil reference section axial width 306. That is, the scaled airfoil reference section axial width 304 is the dimension to which the master airfoil 200 is being axially scaled to tune the frequency of the scaled airfoil 202.
In step 114B, a ratio of the scaled airfoil reference section axial width 304 to the master airfoil reference section axial width 306 is calculated.
In step 114C, the scaled airfoil section axial width is calculated for each of the plurality of scaled airfoil sections. More specifically, each of the scaled airfoil sections includes a scaled airfoil section axial width ratio, which is the ratio of the corresponding scaled airfoil section axial width to the corresponding master airfoil section axial width. Each of the scaled airfoil section axial width ratios is the same as the ratio of the scaled airfoil reference section axial width 304 to the master airfoil reference section axial width 306. As such, the scaled airfoil section axial width for each of the scaled airfoil sections may be calculated by multiplying the scaled airfoil section axial width 304 and the corresponding master airfoil section axial width and dividing the product thereof by the master airfoil reference section axial width 306.
As mentioned above, the scaled airfoil 202 includes the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth scaled airfoil sections 236, 238, 240, 242, 244 in the embodiments shown in
As mentioned above, multiple master airfoils 200 may form the row 224 of the master airfoil stage, and multiple scaled airfoils 202 may form the row 230 of the scaled airfoil stage.
In step 114D, a scaled airfoil circumferential spacing 310 is determined. More specifically, a ratio of the scaled airfoil circumferential spacing 310 to the scaled airfoil reference section axial width 304 is the same as a ratio of a master airfoil circumferential spacing 308 to the master airfoil reference section axial width 306. In this respect, the scaled airfoil circumferential spacing 310 may be calculated by multiplying the master airfoil circumferential spacing 308 by the scaled airfoil reference section axial width 304 and dividing the product thereof by the master airfoil reference section axial width 306.
In some embodiments, the scaled airfoil circumferential spacing 310 is different than the master airfoil circumferential spacing 308. In this respect, a number of scaled airfoils 202 in the scaled stage 230 may be different than a number of master airfoils 200 in the master stage. More specifically, the number of scaled airfoils 202 in the scaled stage 230 increases in step 114E if the scaled airfoil circumferential spacing 310 is less than the master airfoil circumferential spacing 308 for a given reference section diameter. In step 114F, however, the number of scaled airfoils 202 in the scaled stage 230 decreases if the scaled airfoil circumferential spacing 310 is greater than the master airfoil circumferential spacing 308 for a given reference section diameter. As shown in
As mentioned above, steps 114G and 114H may be respectively used to tune the scaled airfoil 202 with the tip shroud 72 and part span shroud 76. More specifically, a position, a size, or a mass of the part span shroud 76 may be adjusted to modify or otherwise change the frequency response of the scaled airfoil 202 in step 114G. In step 114H, a position, a size, or a mass of the tip shroud 72 may be adjusted to modify or otherwise change the frequency response of the scaled airfoil 202.
As mentioned above, step 114 may tune the frequency response of the scaled airfoil 202 after radial scaling (i.e., steps 102-112). In particular, steps 114A-114F tune the frequency response of the scaled airfoil 202 by axially scaling the scaled airfoil 202. Step 114G tunes the frequency response of the scaled airfoil with the part span shroud 76. Step 114H tunes the frequency response of the scaled airfoil with the part span shroud 76. In this respect, steps 114G and 114H may be completed before steps 114A-114F. Furthermore, step 114H may be performed before step 114G.
The method 100 may include additional steps as well. For example, one or more of the scaled airfoils 202 may be manufactured using casting or any other suitable process.
Upon completion of the method 100, the master airfoil 200 is scaled radially and/or axially to form the scaled airfoil 202. In this respect, the scaled airfoil 202 has the same characteristics (e.g., work coefficient, reaction, velocity triangles, etc.) as the master airfoil 200. In some embodiments, the scaled airfoil 202 may rotate at the same speed as and at a different flow than as the master airfoil 200.
Unlike conventional scaling methods, the method 100 may independently radially and axially scale the master airfoil 200. In particular, the scaled airfoil reference section radius 256 may be determined independently of the scaled airfoil reference section axial width 304. That is, the scaled airfoil reference section radius 256 may be determined using one characteristic, and the scaled airfoil reference section axial width 304 using different characteristic. For example, the scaled airfoil reference section radius 256 may be determined using a stage count characteristic, while the scaled airfoil reference section axial width 304 using strength characteristic. Conventional scaling methods, however, cannot independently radially and axially scale airfoils. As such, the method 100 provides greater flexibility when scaling the master airfoil 200 than the conventional scaling methods.
Although generally described above in the context of steam turbine rotor blades, the method 100 may be used to scale any suitable turbomachine airfoil. For example, the methods 100 may be used to scale airfoils incorporated into gas turbine stator vanes and/or rotor blades as well.
This written description uses examples to disclose the technology, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the technology, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the technology is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they include structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.