Patent Application
20250059561
This disclosure relates to the field of recombinant protein production. In particular, the present disclosure relates to a method for selecting a specific signal peptide that efficiently secretes a protein of interest out of host cells from a variety of signal peptides.
Protein translocation is the dynamic mechanism underlying the shipment of about 30% of all cellular proteins across and into the plasma membrane (Gemmer, Forster 2020). This process is facilitated by a translocon, a multi-subunit protein complex located on endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. Universally conserved heterotrimeric protein channel Sec61 forms the core of the translocon.
When the ribosomes start secretory protein synthesis in the cytosol of eukaryotic cells, an ER signal peptide (SP) sequence located at the amino terminus of a nascent polypeptide chain directs the ribosome to the ER membrane. The SP sequence of the nascent protein is recognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP), and the growing polypeptide is translocated across the ER membrane. Thus, SPs function as zip codes marking the protein secretion pathway and the protein target location (Blobel, Dobberstein 1975) Based on computational and experimental studies the SP sequences are divided into three characteristic regions: positively charged amino acid containing hydrophilic N-terminal region, a hydrophobic core region, and a C-terminal region with a cleavage site for a signal peptidase that usually contains polar amino acid residues (von Heijne 1985).
The signal peptide-mediated translocation of secretory proteins into the lumen of the ER has been identified as a bottleneck within the secretory pathway and thus represents a key issue that needs to be resolved to achieve robust production of recombinant proteins. It has been shown that signal peptides are extremely heterogeneous, and many signal peptides are functionally interchangeable even between different species (Tan, Ho et al. 2002). On the other hand, different signal peptides can exert profoundly different effects on protein secretion and function of the produced proteins (Kober et al. 2013). Thus, the efficiency of protein secretion can be strongly affected by the signal peptide sequence These observations are highly indicative of the importance of signal peptide optimization when aiming to produce maximal amounts of recombinant proteins in a mammalian system.
The current signal peptide-optimization methods rely on laborious testing of individual signal peptides (Kober et al. 2013), which either limits the number of sequences-that can be tested, and thus makes discovery of optimal signal peptides unlikely, or takes prohibitively long time.
In this patent application, we present a screening platform that allows rapid and efficient high-throughput screening of thousands of signal peptides for finding optimal ones that allow high-level production of therapeutically relevant proteins in mammalian cells (
In addition to the physical signal peptide screening platform, we have also designed artificial intelligence methods for predicting signal peptides that are optimal for the production of different biotechnologically important proteins. This appears to be an area of interest in the present field of technology so this approach will likely form an important part of the present disclosure.
In an aspect of the present disclosure, we provide a method for screening signal peptides for efficient expression and secretion of a heterologous polypeptide in mammalian cells, the method comprising the steps of:
In another aspect of the present disclosure, we provide a viral expression vector comprising at least a polynucleotide encoding a fusion protein, said polynucleotide comprising: i) a promoter, ii) a sequence encoding a signal peptide, iii) a sequence encoding a polypeptide of interest, iv) optionally a sequence encoding an epitope tag, and v) a sequence encoding a C-terminal signal peptide for glycosylphosphatidylinositol, GPI, attachment.
In further aspects of the present disclosure, we provide 1) a host cell comprising a viral vector according to the present disclosure, and 2) a DNA library comprising multiple viral vectors according to the present disclosure, wherein the vectors encode various candidate signal peptides for a polypeptide of interest.
The term “signal peptide” means herein a peptide that is a part of the N-terminus of a secretory protein that is secreted outside a cell and thus passes through the cell membrane. The signal peptide is usually composed of approximately 10 to 30 amino acids, and is subsequently cleaved and removed by a protease specific for the cell membrane, and only the secretory protein is transferred outside the cell. Signal peptides serve as targeting signals, enabling cellular transport machinery to direct proteins to specific intracellular or extracellular locations. To date, more than 4000 signal peptides present in eukaryotic cells are known. DNA libraries encoding signal peptides are disclosed, e.g., in WO2021045541Al and KR20210028116A.
The term “protein of interest” or “POI” in the present specification means a protein that is intended to be produced with high efficiency by using a suitable host cell. The POI is preferably a therapeutically or diagnostically significant protein such as an antibody.
The term “epitope tag” or EP refers herein to a technique in which a tag (typically 6 to 30 amino acids) is fused to a recombinant protein by placing sequence encoding the epitope within the same open reading frame of the protein by means of genetic engineering. By choosing an epitope tag for which an antibody is available, the technique makes it possible to detect tagged proteins for which otherwise no antibody is available. By selection of the appropriate epitope tag and antibody pair, it is possible to find a combination with properties that are suitable for the desired experimental application, such as Western blot analysis, immunoprecipitation, immunochemistry, affinity purification, and others. Preferred epitope tags can be selected for example from a group consisting of Histidine tag (His-tag), myc-tag, FLAG-tag, small ubiquitin-like modifier tag (SUMO-tag), a heavy chain of protein C tag (HPC-tag), a calmodulin binding peptide tag (CBP-tag), and a hemagglutinin-tag (HA-tag).
The term “GPI-anchored” refers herein to glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored proteins which are found on the external surfaces of eukaryotic cells These secreted proteins are anchored to the plasma membrane with a GPI moiety covalently attached to the C-terminus of the protein. The GPI moiety consists of the conserved core glycan, phosphatidylinositol and glycan side chains. The structure of the core glycan is EtNP-6Manα2-Manα6-(EtNP)2Manα4-GlNα6-myoIno-P-lipid (EtNP, ethanolamine phosphate; Man, mannose; GlcN, glucosamine; Ino, inositol). In the present disclosure, a C-terminal signal peptide directs a protein to the GPI attachment, see, e.g., EP3389682.
The term “transmembrane domain” refers herein to a hydrophobic alpha helix structure that transverses the host cell membrane. The transmembrane domain may be directly fused to the C-terminal part of the fusion protein encoded by the present vectors. In certain embodiments, the transmembrane domain is derived from an integral membrane protein (e.g., receptor, cluster of differentiation (CD) molecule, enzyme, transporter, cell adhesion molecule, or the like). In preferred embodiments, the transmembrane domain is derived from Type 1 transmembrane proteins exemplified by human VCAM-1 protein (vascular cell adhesion molecule 1). Type I transmembrane proteins are anchored to the lipid membrane with a stop-transfer anchor sequence and have their N-terminal domains targeted to the extracellular space, when a mature form of the protein is located on the cell membrane. Further examples of transmembrane domains according to the present disclosure include, but are not limited to, Tim1, Tim2and Tim3 transmembrane domains, FcR transmembrane domains, and a CD8a transmembrane domain. Further transmembrane domains for use in the present invention are disclosed in EP3389682.
The term “vector” is used herein to refer to a nucleic acid molecule capable of mediating entry of, e.g., transferring, transporting, etc., another nucleic acid molecule into a cell. The transferred nucleic acid is generally linked to, e.g., inserted into, the vector nucleic acid molecule. A vector may include sequences that direct autonomous replication, or may include sequences sufficient to allow integration into host cell DNA. Useful vectors include, for example, plasmids, cosmids, and viral vectors. Useful viral vectors include, e.g., replication defective retroviruses, adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses, and lentiviruses. As will be evident to one of ordinary skill in the art, viral vectors may include various viral components in addition to nucleic acid(s) that mediate entry of the transferred nucleic acid. Thus, the term viral vector may refer either to a virus or viral particle capable of transferring a nucleic acid into a cell or to the transferred nucleic acid itself.
In an embodiment, the present disclosure is directed to a method for screening a signal peptide for efficient expression and secretion of a heterologous polypeptide in mammalian cells, the method comprising the steps of:
In a preferred embodiment, wherein said pool of viral expression vectors encoding a polypeptide of interest in step a) of the present method is prepared by
In a preferred embodiment, wherein the library of oligonucleotides encoding various signal peptides comprises the known signal peptides of eukaryotic, preferably mammalian, bacterial or viral proteins, modifications thereof and/or artificial sequences.
In another preferred embodiment, the method of the present disclosure comprises a further step of
In a preferred embodiment, said promoter of the vector is an inducible promoter, preferably a tetracycline controlled promoter.
In another embodiment, the present disclosure is directed to a viral expression vector comprising at least a polynucleotide encoding a fusion protein, said polynucleotide comprising: i) a promoter, ii) a sequence encoding a signal peptide, iii) a sequence encoding a polypeptide of interest, iv) optionally a sequence encoding an epitope tag, and v) a sequence encoding a C-terminal signal peptide for glycosylphosphatidylinositol, GPI, attachment.
In further embodiments, the present disclosure is directed to 1) a host cell comprising a vector according to the present disclosure or 2) a DNA library comprising multiple viral vectors according to the present disclosure, wherein the vectors encode various candidate signal peptides for a polypeptide of interest.
While the following examples are illustrative of the principles of the present invention in one or more particular applications, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications in form, usage and details of implementation can be made without the exercise of inventive faculty, and without departing from the principles and concepts of the present disclosure. Accordingly, it is not intended that the present invention be limited, except as by the claims set forth below.
The verbs “to comprise” and “to include” are used in this document as open limitations that neither exclude nor require the existence of also un-recited features. The features recited in depending claims are mutually freely combinable unless otherwise explicitly stated. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the use of “a” or “an”, that is, a singular form, throughout this document does not exclude a plurality.
Reference throughout this specification to one embodiment or an embodiment means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present disclosure. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment”, “in an embodiment” or “in a preferred embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Where reference is made to a numerical value using a term such as, for example, about or substantially, the exact numerical value is also disclosed.
The lentiviral transfer plasmid which allows the expression of the protein-of-interest (POI) in a plasma-membrane anchored form forms the core of our signal peptide-screening platform (
The lentiviral transfer plasmid (
For signal-peptide screening of superfolder-GFP SP-ubiquiting G76V(Ub(G76V))-sfGFP-GPI-anchor construct was assembled with over-lap extension PCR from separate Ub(G76V) (Dantuma, Lindsten et al. 2000), sfGFP (Costantini, Baloban et al. 2015) and GPI-anchor (Rhee, Pirity et al. 2006) inserts. The assembled fusion-protein insert was cloned in place of the tRFP-shRNA insert of the original pINDUCER11 plasmid.
For signal-peptide screening of FVII, DNA constructs containing a hamster codon-optimized, inactive FVII (D302N)-mutant were ordered as SP-3xFLAG-tag-FVII-GPI or SP-HA-tag-FVII-GPI fusion protein gene fragments from Twist Biosciences. These fusion-protein encoding DNA constructs were cloned in place of the tRFP-shRNA insert of the original pINDUCER11 plasmid.
Functional Components of the Modified pINDUCER11 Plasmid:
For directional cloning, SP insert generated by annealing oligonucleotides and circular pINDUCER vector were double-digested with two RE's, MluI and NotI. Additionally, double-digested pINDUCER vector was treated with Shrimp alkaline phosphatase (rSAP) which nonspecifically catalyzed the dephosporylation of 5′ ends to avoid the self-ligation of the vector. However, ligation of DNA fragments require the 5′ phosphate groups to form phosphodiester bonds, double-digested oligonucleotides were subjected to phosphorylation in a thermal cycler using T4 polynucleotide kinase (NEB) in presence of ATP. Thus generated SP insert and linear pINDUCER vector were covalently ligated together using T4DNA ligase (NEB). The entire ligation mixture was transformed into stable3 (Thermo Fisher) chemical competent E. coli cells and grown onto LB agar plates containing ampicillin antibiotic (100 μg/ml). Resulting colonies were screened for the correct SP insert by Sanger sequencing.
Human embryonic kidney 293 cells (HEK293T) (Thermo-Fisher Scientific) were cultured as adherent monolayers in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 0.5% L-Glutamine. FreeStyle Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) suspension adapted (CHO-S) cells (Thermo-Fisher Scientific) were grown as a suspension culture in FreeStyle™ CHO media (Thermo-Fisher Scientific). Both the cell lines were cultured under standard conditions at 37° C., 5% CO2.
Following signal peptides were selected for proof-of-concept experiments with sfGFP; SP1 (Interleukin 4), SP2 (Serum Albumin), SP3 fPrP (mut 17-21) SP4 (Azurocidin preprotein) SP5 (Cellulase), SP6 (PrP), SP7 (Vcam), SP8 (FCRL-1).
Aforementioned SPs were cloned into the modified pINDUCER11 (see 2) RE sites for MluI (NEB) and NotI (NEB) were utilized. Detailed cloning strategy is explained here.
For each signal peptide, oligonucleotides containing the respective sequence coding for the signal peptide were synthesized (from Integrated Data Technologies). All the oligonucleotides were flanked by MluI and NotI restriction enzyme sites on 5′ and 3′ ends respectively. Single stranded oligonucleotides were annealed in a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad) to generate a dsDNA insert.
Third generation lentiviral transfer plasmid pINDUCER11 containing gene of interest was designed as disclosed above. Two different signal peptides (Table 1), selected on the basis of their differential effects on FVII expression PMID: (Peng, Yu et al. 2016), were cloned into the N-termini of 3xFLAG-tag-FVII-GPI and HA-tag-FVII-GPI fusion constructs.
Third generation lentiviral transfer plasmid pINDUCER11 containing gene of interest was designed as disclosed above. Other lentiviral packaging plasmids pVP157, pVP158, pVP159 and pVP160 were received as a gift from Martin Kampmann/Jonathan Weissmann (Bassik, Kampmann et al. 2013).
The lentivirus production was based on polyethyleneimine (PEI) mediated transfection protocol as described elsewhere (PMID: (Lobato-Pascual, Saether et al. 2013, Bassik, Kampmann et al. 2013). Briefly, cationic polymer PEI containing Transporter 5® Transfection reagent (Polysciences, Germany) was used to transfer and packaging vectors into the HEK293T cells. In total 800-1000μg of transfer plasmid was mixed with packing plasmids. Transfection reagent was diluted in PBS and was mixed with the plasmids. This mixture was incubated at room temperature for 25 min. Dropwise addition of this mixture to adherent HEK293T cell culture assured even distribution. Cells were incubated for three days (72 h) post-transfection. The supernatant containing lentivirus was collected. The supernatant solution was filtered using 0.45μ filtration assembly. The filtered lentivirus was collected in aliquots and stored at 4° C.
The protocol for lentivirus titration was adapted from (Tiscornia, Singer et al. 2006).
Day 1: Seed 24-well plates with 500 μl cells (100,000 cells in each well)
Day 3: Four-fold serial dilution of lentiviral stock was prepared in the media.
Virus dilutions: undiluted, 1:4, 1:16, 1:64
The media was removed from the wells of 24-well plate and supplemented with 250 μL of fresh media. Virus dilutions were added (20 μL) in a dropwise manner to the cells, mixed gently and incubated the cells at 37° C. After 2-3 h additional 250 μL of media was added to the wells. Cells were grown for 48 h.
Day 5: The media was discarded from the wells. Cells were washed once with 150 μl of PBS. Cells were dislodged using 30 μl of Trypsin (0.5%) and then mixed with 500 μl fresh media. In another plate 400 μl fresh media was added together with 100 μl cells from day 3. Cells were then incubated at 37° C. for 3 days.
This step was repeated for three additional times. In total, cells were washed and divided for a week. These extensive washing steps were important to remove the virus particles.
Day 14: Cells were prepared for FACS analysis as explained in flow cytometry section below. FACS analysis was performed to determine the percentage of fluorescent reporter (GFP and mRFP) positive cells.
Virus titer (VT=TU/mL, transduction units) was calculated according to the following formula: Transduction Unit (TU/ml)=(N×P)/(V×D)
Where; N=Cell Number in each well used for infection on Day 2; P=percentage of GFP/RFP positive cells (should be 10% ˜20%); V=virus volume used for infection in each well; the V (ml)=20(μl)×10−3 in this protocol; D=dilution fold; TU=transduction unit.
HEK293T and CHOcells were transduced with 3X-FLAG-or HA-tag harboring FVII-fusion protein or sfGFP-fusion protein encoding lentiviruses. Transduced cells were splitted 2 times. 24 h prior to harvesting, cells were induced with 1 μg/ml doxycycline. Cells were harvested with 10 mM EDTA. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 2400 rpm for 5 min at room temperature and then resuspended in room-temperature FACS Buffer (1×PBS, 4% FBS, 10 mM EDTA). Sample aliquot was saved for FACS analysis, with the rest pelleted by centrifugation for 2 min at 2400 rpm at room temperature and then resuspended in 1 mL FACS buffer. Centrifugation was repeated and the media was then removed (1 wash). Cell pellet was resuspended in 500 μl primary antibody solution (see Table 2), incubated for 15 min at room temperature and then washed twice with 1 mL FACS buffer. Afterwards, cells were resuspended in 500 μl secondary antibody solution (see Table 2), incubated for 15 min at room temperature, washed twice with 1 mL FACS buffer and finally resuspended in FACS buffer. Just before the FACS measurements, cells were strained twice into FACS tubes and then either analyzed with BD LSRFortessa flow-cytometer or sorted with BD FACSAria II flow-cytometer to low and high Antibody signal showing populations (see Fig.1). The flow-cytometry data was analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
Laser and filter parameters used in BD LSRFortessa analysis were:
qPCR was utilized to identify individual signal peptides fused into the protein of interest (POI) from cells transduced with a mixed pool SP-POI lentivirus construct. For this the gDNA of the flow-cytometer sorted cells was isolated with Nucleospin Blood Quickpure or L kits (Macherey Nagel). Enrichment of specific signal peptide-containing constructs in a specific sorted cell population (see
Next generation sequencing (NGS) was utilized to identify all signal peptides that have enriched into the best POI expression, showing high antibody signal flow-cytometry sorted cells population (see Fig.1). For this, first the gDNA of the flow-cytometer sorted cells was isolated with Nucleospin Blood Quickpure or L kits (Macherey Nagel). 2 μg of gDNA corresponding roughly to 360 000 copies of a diploid CHO cell genome was added to 50 μl PCR reaction mixture which contained Q5-buffer (NEB), 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.5 mM forward and reverse primer (see Table 4), 4% DMSO, 1 U Q5 hot start polymerase (NEB) and additional 2 mM MgC12. The PCR was then carried out with the following parameters: Step 1. 98° C. 3 min, Step 2. 98° C. 30 sec, Step 3. 61° C. 15 sec, Step 4. 72° C. 15 sec, Steps 2-4 were cycled for 25 times, Step. 5. 72° C. 5 min.
The amplified, SP encoding amplicons were then size-selected with AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter) and finally sequenced with MiSeq sequencing (Illumina). The highest expression level conferring signal peptides were identified by comparing the read enrichment between the highest expressing 1% and the remaining 99% of the transduced, sorted cells.
AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACA
CACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATC
TTAGAAGACACCGGGACCG SEQ ID NO: 12
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATATCGC
CGTGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTT
CCGATCTACCAGTCAGAGTCTTCACGAAG
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATCATGA
AAGGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTT
CCGATCTACCAGTCAGAGTCTTCACGAAG
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATGATAG
TTGGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTT
CCGATCTACCAGTCAGAGTCTTCACGAAG
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATTGGTT
GCCGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTT
CCGATCTACCAGTCAGAGTCTTCACGAAG
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATGAAAT
GTCGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTT
CCGATCTACCAGTCAGAGTCTTCACGAAG
CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATCTCCA
CCAGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTT
CCGATCTACCAGTCAGAGTCTTCACGAAG
1 = Illumina adapter sequence of each primer is marked by underlining.
2 = The bar code index in the reverse primer's illumina adapter is shown in bold. When different sorted populations were sequenced on the same chip, different index containing reverse primers were used for the preparation of amplicons from each separate population.
Elisa assay was used to show that the results of our SP screening are transferable to protein production conditions, mimicking high-level protein production in biopharmaceutical industry. Here the assay was done after identifying the highest expression level conferring signal peptides for both FVII and sfGFP. To express the aforementioned SPs containing proteins in secreted form, the protein encoding expression plasmids were transiently transfected into HEK293T or CHO cells, or other suitable mammalian expression host cells.
Depending on the target of interest, the media containing the secreted protein was harvested typically after three to five days after the transfection. Expression test samples were collected to conical tubes and centrifuged (Eppendorf) at room temperature for five minutes at 500×g, in order to pellet the cells. The cleared supernatants were placed in new tubes and the amount of the secreted sfGFP or FVII was quantified by using sandwich ELISA assay against the target of interest.
Namely, the POI or its epitope tag-binding protein was pre-coated on a 96-well ELISA plate. Harvested cleared expression media was then applied on the pre-coated plate. In addition, the separate positive and negative controls (commercial, purified POI and harvested media from mock-transfected cells, respectively) were used to verify the functionality of the assay; this was to outrule the possible false positives, and also in order to estimate the POI expression level and its functionality on the basis of its affinity against the target.
Typically the Elisa test was performed following the standard procedures recommended by manufacturers (such as Thermo-Fisher Scientific). Capture target was coated to the plate, typically overnight at 4° C. The unbound proteins were washed away with assay buffer; washing was repeated 3 times, after which the plate was briefly dried by tapping. Commercial blocking buffer (for example from Thermo-Fisher Scientific) was placed to all wells, and plate was incubated at room temperature for one hour. Blocking buffer was removed and cleared expression media and controls were added to the wells. Washing step was repeated as described previously and the wells were treated with suitable labelled antibody (Thermo-Fisher Scientific). In order to detect the protein-target complex signal, the plate was briefly air-dried by tapping against paper towel and after this 50 μl of labelled secondary detection antibody in blocking buffer was added to wells. The excess detection antibody was washed away and suitable assay buffer was added. The signals were measured by using ELISA plate reader (Thermo-Fisher Scientific).
In case needed, the HRP detection was used. In this case, instead of assay buffer, HRP conjugate and HRP substrate were added at final step, followed by the detection by using plate reader.
Results of the above methods are shown in
BASSIK, M.C., KAMPMANN, M., LEBBINK, R.J., WANG, S., HEIN, M.Y., POSER, I., WEIBEZAHN, J., HORLBECK, M.A., CHEN, S., MANN, M., HYMAN, A.A., LEPROUST, E.M., MCMANUS, M.T. and WEISSMAN, J.S., 2013. A systematic mammalian genetic interaction map reveals pathways underlying ricin susceptibility. Cell, 152(4), pp. 909-922.
BLOBEL, G. and DOBBERSTEIN, B., 1975. Transfer of proteins across membranes. I. Presence of proteolytically processed and unprocessed nascent immunoglobulin light chains on membrane-bound ribosomes of murine myeloma. The Journal of cell biology, 67(3), pp. 835-851.
COSTANTINI, L.M., BALOBAN, M., MARKWARDT, M.L., RIZZO, M., GUO, F., VERKHUSHA, V.V. and SNAPP, E.L., 2015. A palette of fluorescent proteins optimized for diverse cellular environments. Nature communications, 6, pp. 7670.
DANTUMA, N.P., LINDSTEN, K., GLAS, R., JELLNE, M. and MASUCCI, M.G., 2000. Short-lived green fluorescent proteins for quantifying ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent proteolysis in living cells. Nature biotechnology, 18(5), pp. 538-543.
GEMMER, M. and FORSTER, F., 2020. A clearer picture of the ER translocon complex. Journal of cell science, 133(3), pp. 10.1242/jcs.231340.
KOBER, L., ZEHE, C. and BODE, J., 2013. Optimized signal peptides for the development of high expressing CHO cell lines. Biotechnology and bioengineering, 110(4), pp. 1164-1173.
LOBATO-PASCUAL, A., SAETHER, P.C., FOSSUM, S., DISSEN, E. and DAWS, M.R., 2013. Mincle, the receptor for mycobacterial cord factor, forms a functional receptor complex with MCL and FcepsilonRI-gamma. European journal of immunology, 43(12), pp. 3167-3174.
MEERBREY, K.L., HU, G., KESSLER, J.D., ROARTY, K., LI, M.Z., FANG, J.E., HERSCHKOWITZ, J.I., BURROWS, A.E., CICCIA, A., SUN, T., SCHMITT, E.M., BERNARDI, R.J., FU, X., BLAND, C.S., COOPER, T.A., SCHIFF, R., ROSEN, J.M.,
WESTBROOK, T.F. and ELLEDGE, S.J., 2011. The pINDUCER lentiviral toolkit for inducible RNA interference in vitro and in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(9), pp. 3665-3670.
PENG, L., YU, X., LI, C., CAI, Y., CHEN, Y., HE, Y., YANG, J., JIN, J. and LI, H., 2016. Enhanced recombinant factor VII expression in Chinese hamster ovary cells by optimizing signal peptides and fed-batch medium. Bioengineered, 7(3), pp. 189-197.
RHEE, J.M., PIRITY, M.K., LACKAN, C.S., LONG, J.Z., KONDOH, G., TAKEDA, J. and HADJANTONAKIS, A.K., 2006. In vivo imaging and differential localization of lipid-modified GFP-variant fusions in embryonic stem cells and mice. Genesis (New York, N.Y.: 2000), 44(4), pp. 202-218.
SHCHERBAKOVA, D.M. and VERKHUSHA, V.V., 2013. Near-infrared fluorescent proteins for multicolor in vivo imaging. Nature methods, 10(8), pp. 751-754.
STRACK, R.L., STRONGIN, D.E., BHATTACHARYYA, D., TAO, W., BERMAN, A., BROXMEYER, H.E., KEENAN, R.J. and GLICK, B.S., 2008. A noncytotoxic DsRed variant for whole-cell labeling. Nature methods, 5(11), pp. 955-957.
TAN, N.S., HO, B. and DING, J.L., 2002. Engineering a novel secretion signal for cross-host recombinant protein expression. Protein engineering, 15(4), pp. 337-345.
TISCORNIA, G., SINGER, O. and VERMA, I.M., 2006. Production and purification of lentiviral vectors. Nature protocols, 1(1), pp. 241-245.
VON HEIJNE, G., 1985. Signal sequences. The limits of variation. Journal of Molecular Biology, 184(1), pp. 99-105.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20216346 | Dec 2021 | FI | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/FI2022/050871 | 12/23/2022 | WO |
