Patent Application
20070144389
This application claims the priority, under 35 U.S.C. §119, of German application DE 10 2005 060 889.2, filed Dec. 20, 2005; the prior application is herewith incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The invention relates to a method for the selection of printing materials in a machine processing printing materials and having at least one control computer. The operating data of the machine processing printing materials is logged by the computer and a tolerance limit corresponding to the operating data registered is stored in the computer.
The operation of a printing press is all the more economic when the fewest unusable prints are produced. The unusable prints are designated rejects and arise in particular when starting up a printing press or after a job change, since here the entire printing press first has to be transferred to a stable operating state until the printing quality is constant. These phases should be as short as possible in a printing press, in order that few rejects are produced. However, even after the initial unstable phase, the printing method is not stable under all conditions because of the many external conditions which have an effect on the printing method. For example, temperature changes, increased atmospheric humidity, increasing wear on the printing press and similar effects have an effect on the printing operation and therefore the printing image on the printing materials produced. In the case of a sheetfed rotary printing press, the printed sheets produced are deposited on a stack in a deliverer. If the conditions change during the printing operation, there is the risk that, because of these fluctuations, sheets are produced which, although they are deposited on the deliverer stack, do not correspond to the requirements of the customer. It is therefore important that these printed sheets do not reach the customer.
German laid-open patent specification DE-OS 22 59 761 discloses an apparatus for registering and separating out rejects during the printing operation of a printing press. For this purpose, measuring devices which register the quality of the printing sheets and are thus able to distinguish reject sheets from good sheets are fitted in the printing press. One criterion for this can be, for example, the registration of register marks which are applied to the sheets for the in-register printing. If the register marks exceed a predefined register error, the corresponding sheets are recognized as rejects and appropriately removed from the printing press via a diverter by the reject recognition apparatus provided with a shift register.
Published, non-prosecuted German patent application DE 198 32 453 A1, corresponding to U.S. Pat. No. 6,244,174, discloses a maintenance and inspection system for a printing press which has a computer which is connected to sensors and is connected to signal generators belonging to the printing press. In this case, the computer registers the signals from the signal generators and the drive motors of the printing press and, from the signals, determines the state of consumable materials and the state of wear of the corresponding machine components. On the basis of the state determined, the time and scope of appropriate maintenance measures are then defined. This is intended to ensure that maintenance and inspection measures are carried out in good time before the operating state of the printing press deteriorates to such an extent that the rejects increase sharply during a printing operation. However, the maintenance and diagnostic system merely monitors the state of the printing press and, if necessary, outputs warning hints to the operator if maintenance is urgently required. In this case, however, sorting out reject sheets is not carried out.
It is accordingly an object of the invention to provide a method for selecting printing materials in a printing press and to a printing press that overcomes the above-mentioned disadvantages of the prior art devices and methods of this general type, which permits the most precise forecast possible of rejects that occur during a printing operation.
The method according to the invention is extremely well suited to making estimates relating to rejects to be expected in sheetfed offset printing presses. However, the method is not restricted to this application; for example it can also be used in digital printing presses or copiers. According to the present method, a machine processing the printing materials is equipped with a control computer which registers and logs the operating data from the machine. In addition, one or more tolerance limits corresponding to the operating data registered are stored in the control computer. The operating data of a printing press can be operating temperature, atmospheric humidity, inking unit temperature but also voltage fluctuations in the power supply of the printing press. In this case, the operating data registered is compared continuously with the stored tolerance limits; when one or more tolerance limits are exceeded during a specific time interval, the printing materials produced in this time interval are registered by the control computer. Therefore, in the event of deviations which are not to be tolerated occurring in operating data from the printing press, these deviations are assigned chronologically to the corresponding printed sheets in the printing press. The printing materials are then stored in the control computer of the printing press so that by using, for example, the counter reading of the printing press, the corresponding sheets can be found again at any time. Accordingly, operating states are assigned to printing materials in which predefined tolerance limits are exceeded.
In a first refinement of the invention, provision is made for disturbances occurring in the power supply of the machine processing printing materials to be registered in the control computer. Disturbances in the power supply can be in particular mains fluctuations but also short power failures. The mains fluctuation and power failures necessarily have an effect on the electric drive motors of the printing press. These in turn influence the printing operation since, as a result, the printing speed of the printing press likewise begins to fluctuate. A fluctuating printing speed always ensures an increased susceptibility to rejects, however, so that it is expedient to register those sheets during whose production time corresponding fluctuations have occurred in the power supply. If necessary, the sheets can then be removed separately and subjected to additional assessment by the printer.
In a further refinement of the invention, provision is made for the machine processing printing materials to be a printing press and for printing speed changes to be registered by the control computer. Not every fluctuation in the power supply must simultaneously necessarily lead to a change in the printing speed of the printing press, since the printing press represents a rather sluggish oscillatory system because of the high rotating masses. It is therefore expedient to register the printing speed of the machine additionally via sensors, so that the control computer knows whether a change in the printing speed has actually taken place because of any kind of disturbances and rejects accumulate in this way.
Furthermore, provision is made for the machine for processing the printing materials to be a printing press and for adjustment procedures in the inking unit of the printing press to be registered by the control computer. If adjustment procedures are carried out in an inking unit of the printing press, these necessarily have an effect on the printed image of the sheet currently being produced. This can still be disregarded in the case of small control interventions but not in the case of larger control interventions. Adjustment procedures in the inking unit of a printing press are in particular changes in the openings of inking zone slides in the ink fountain. Using these inking zone slides, ink metering and therefore the application of ink to the printing material is controlled. For a uniformly constant printing quality, a uniform application of ink is necessary, which can be influenced detrimentally by adjustment procedures in the inking unit. By the present invention, it is possible to register those sheets during whose production these adjustment procedures were carried out in the inking unit. These sheets can likewise be subjected to additional assessment by the printer or separated out by the latter.
Advantageously, provision is additionally made for the operating data registered to be evaluated and assessed by using predefined assessment principles stored in the control computer. The operating data of a printing press is first stored separately in the control computer. In this case, it is possible to provide a separate tolerance limit for each type of operating data, in order to measure the operating data on this tolerance limit. Alternatively, however, the operating data can also first be registered and assessed in its entirety and the result of the assessment can then be compared with the predefined overall tolerance limit. In this case, and also in the first case, individual operating data can be assigned different weights, so that exceeding can be permitted in the case of some operating data while, in the case of other critical operating data, this is weighted more highly in the result of the assessment. This assessment and weighting is carried out by using mathematical models which are deposited in the control computer in the form of software. At the end of the assessment, however, there is always a statement as to whether the associated printing material has exceeded one or more permissible tolerance limits and, if appropriate, is registered by the control computer as rejects.
Provision is advantageously made for the printing materials produced and registered to be removed from the machine processing the printing materials by a sheet diverter. Since the sheets in which there is a suspicion of rejects are in each case registered by the control computer, the removal of the registered printing materials by a sheet diverter can be implemented relatively simply. Each sheet is assigned a counter reading, so that the sheet is registered appropriately, at least in the control computer. By using the passage speed induced by the printing speed, a sheet diverter fitted at the end of the printing press can then be given a signal that the corresponding printing material is not to be deposited on the deliverer stack but is to be removed by a sheet diverter.
Provision can additionally be made for the sheets removed to be deposited on a rejects stack. In this case, in addition to the deliverer stack having the good sheets, an additional rejects stack is created, which is supplied with reject sheets via the sheet diverter and a rejects deliverer.
Furthermore, provision can be made for the sheet printing materials produced and registered by the control computer to be provided with a marking. For this purpose, a marking unit, which is operatively connected to the control computer, is fitted in the printing press. Each sheet which is designated as suspected of being a reject by the control computer is provided with an appropriate marking by the marking unit. This can be imprints or else a marking by punching or perforation, so that reject sheets can be detected visually as such by the printer at any time.
In an alternative refinement of the invention, provision is made for the sheet printing materials registered by the control computer to be separated from further sheet printing materials by a tab inserter. It is therefore possible to dispense with a sheet diverter and nevertheless to separate reject sheets from the good sheets. In this case, this separation of the reject sheets takes place in the deliverer stack, a tab being inserted into the deliverer stack in each case before and after the reject sheet or sheets. Thus, the reject sheets are always located between two inserted tabs and can be separated easily from the good sheets in the deliverer stack.
Other features which are considered as characteristic for the invention are set forth in the appended claims.
Although the invention is illustrated and described herein as embodied in a method for selecting printing materials in a printing press and a printing press, it is nevertheless not intended to be limited to the details shown, since various modifications and structural changes may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention and within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims.
The construction and method of operation of the invention, however, together with additional objects and advantages thereof will be best understood from the following description of specific embodiments when read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to the figures of the drawing in detail and first, particularly, to
Both the rejects diverter 3 and the tab inserter 111 are connected to the control computer 10 of the printing press 100 and can be controlled by the computer. In addition, the control computer 10 controls power electronics 11 of the various electric drive motors in the printing press 100. Both the control computer 10 and the power electronics 11 draw their electric power from a power supply 12, which is connected to the public power network. It is therefore clear that mains fluctuations in the public power network can also affect the operating state of the printing press 100 via the power supply 12. However, these fluctuations are registered in the control computer 10 of the printing press 100 and assigned to the corresponding sheets 109 currently being produced. This assignment is made via the internal counter of the printing press, so that the operating conditions during the production of a sheet 109 can be assigned to the latter at any time. In addition to voltage fluctuations in the power network, further operating data such as atmospheric humidity, temperature or adjustment movements in the inking units 108 are registered. The adjustment movements in the inking units 108 are in this case made by electric motors which are able to adjust the individual inking zones; the actuation is likewise carried out via the control computer 10.
It is possible to proceed further in various ways with the sheet 109 registered in this way. For example, the reject sheet 109 judged to be poor can be removed via the rejects diverter 3 and deposited on the rejects stack 110. Alternatively, the reject sheets 109 can be deposited on the deliverer stack 5 and marked appropriately by a tab inserter 111 by tabs. In addition, the sheets 109 can also be identified as rejects by applying a marking. In this way, it is possible for the printer to detect without difficulty those sheets 109 during whose production operating disturbances have occurred, which permits conclusions to be drawn with great probability that the printing quality does not correspond to the requirements. Nevertheless, the printer does not simply have to throw these sheets 109 away; he can carry out an additional visual inspection and then, if appropriate, nevertheless pass on the sheets 109 to further processing.
If the registered print quality Qact lies within the permissible tolerance limits Qlimit, then the associated sheet 109 is judged to be good and it does not need to be registered further by the control computer 10. In this case, the sheet 109 in the deliverer 4 is deposited on the deliverer stack 5 and released for further print processing. As compared with conventional assessment of the print quality by optical sensors, what is known as an “in-line” measuring apparatus in sheetfed offset printing presses, the present invention offers the great advantage that, so to speak, “feedforward” control is carried out. It is not the case that the effects of disturbing influences on the printed image of the sheet 109 are awaited and these are registered by optical sensors and then the corresponding sheets 109 are determined; instead the effects of the disturbing influences on the printed image of a sheet 109 are calculated in advance and the corresponding sheet 109 is then registered at the same time. In this way, it is possible to dispense with an expensive optical “in-line” measuring apparatus and nevertheless to register the print quality of individual sheets 109.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2005 060 889.2 | Dec 2005 | DE | national |
