Method for sensing coal-rock interface

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6435619
  • Patent Number
    6,435,619
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 23, 1999
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 20, 2002
    23 years ago
Abstract
An armored detector assembly, a mining system, and methods of using it are described. The armored detector assembly consists of a main assembly and a hatch assembly. The hatch assembly is welded onto mining equipment, and the main assembly is removably attached to the hatch assembly. The armored detector assembly houses sensitive monitoring equipment used in mining operations. Because of its rugged construction the armored detector assembly is suitable for storing a wide range of sensitive equipment in harsh industrial environments. One embodiment allows for openings in the main assembly so that gamma radiation can enter the main assembly and be measured by gamma radiation monitoring equipment used in continuous mining operations. A portion of the gamma radiation monitoring equipment is enclosed within an integral explosion proof enclosure. This embodiment contains a fluid channel and a plurality of spray orifices to reduce the risk of ignition of dust or gas and other orifices for removal of mining debris from the openings in the assembly.
Description




BACKGROUND




The invention described herein generally relates to an apparatus for detecting the presence of rock during coal mining operations, and more particularly, to an armored detector system, utilizing sensitive monitoring equipment, such as radiation detecting equipment, which is used in mining operations to allow removal of essentially all the coal with very little cutting into the rock above and below the coal.




The use of sensitive monitoring equipment in mining operations is well known. It is further known that radiation sensors in particular are well suited for use in coal mining operations. Their conventional use allows for limited control of the cutting depth for a variety of continuous excavators used in mining operations. However, effective use of gamma detectors has been impaired due to the inability to place the detectors such that they can accurately measure the thickness of the coal remaining to be cut or, in effect, to accurately measure the distance between the cutter and the rock that is to be avoided. Conventionally, suitably sized detectors have only been able to make real-time measurements at locations other than in the region actively being cut and then have inferred or calculated, in a somewhat indirect manner, the parameter that ultimately must be known; namely, the distance from the cutter to the rock. Further, such conventional approaches have tried to project cutting decisions to future or succeeding cuts rather than making real time cutting decisions during the current cutting stroke. Such approaches have only had limited success, particularly on continuous miners, because of the large variations in the formations, cutting conditions and other operational variables.




In coal mining operations, radiation sensors, such as gamma sensors, are currently used to detect radiation emissions from layers of fireclay and shale and other non-coal materials in the surrounding ground. Radiation is emitted from non-coal layers in various quantities dependent upon the type of non-coal material. As the radiation passes through the coal from the rock, it is attenuated. It is this attenuation that is measured, or counted, to determine when cutting should be halted to avoid cutting into the rock. Counting gamma rays must be accomplished over a period of time because the nature of radiation is statistical, having an emission rate that is represented by a Gaussian distribution around some central value.




The most accurate measurements of the distance from the cutter to the rock to be avoided is to place the sensor near the region of the mineral being cut, rather than at a distance away or near some other region. Data must be accumulated over time in order to average the readings so as to establish that central value. Since the radiation in a coal mines is relatively weak, the view angle needs to be large in order to obtain data in a sufficiently short time in order to be used to control real-time cutting actions. But, large view angles in conventional devices have resulted in viewing radiation sources other than from the region that needs to be measured so this makes the measurement inaccurate. In other words, choosing a narrow viewing angle has reduced the count rate, requiring more time which resulted in decreasing the accuracy since the miner is active and must continue. But, making the view angle wider also has reduced the accuracy.




It is also known that radiation detecting equipment is sensitive and must be protected from harsh environments to survive and to produce accurate, noise free signals. This protection must include protection from physical shock and stress, including force, vibration, and abrasion, encountered during mining operations. However, the closer in proximity equipment is to the mineral being mined, the greater is the shock, vibration and stress to which the equipment is subjected. Thus, there is a tension between placing conventional radiation detectors close to the surface being mined to make accurate measurements and providing adequate protection to ensure survival of the sensor and to avoid degradation of the data by the effects of the harsh environment. Conventionally, the need to assure survival of the sensor has resulted in placement of the sensor away from the target of interest. Another conventional approach has been to make the sensing element smaller so that it can be more easily placed in a strategically desirable location, but the sensitivity of the element drops as the size is reduced, and again, the accuracy reduces in a corresponding fashion.




One method of mining coal is continuous mining, in which tunnels are bored through the earth with a machine including a cutting drum attached to a moveable boom. The operator of a continuous mining machine must control the mining machine with an obstructed view of the coal being mined. This is because the operator is situated a distance from the cutting made by the picks on the cutting drum and his view is obstructed by the portions of the mining machine as well as dust created in the mining operation and water sprays provided by the miner. Another method of mining coal is longwall mining, which also involves the use of a cutting drum attached to a boom. In longwall mining, as compared with continuous mining, the drum cuts a swath of earth up to one thousand feet at a time. Both continuous mining machines and longwall mining machines are used in very harsh conditions.




Mining operations are more efficient when the coal-rock boundary is accurately determined. By accurately determining the coal-rock boundary, the unnecessary removal of rock is minimized, while the amount of coal removed is optimized. Due to the impaired ability of mining machine operators from accurately visualizing the surface being mined, operators often cut beyond the coal-rock boundary, often cutting into rock, adding tremendously to the cost of mining due to increased removal costs, lower coal yield efficiency, and greater replacement costs for the cutting tools on the cutting drums.




It is known that sensors can be mounted on the mining machines somewhat near the cutting drum. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,981,327 (Bessinger, et al.). Bessinger, et al. describes a method and apparatus for sensing a coal-rock interface during longwall mining by placing the sensor in a cowl adjacent the shearer drum. A disadvantage of conventional devices such as the device described in Bessinger, et al. is that such devices measure radiation after the leading drum of the mining machine has completed its cutting pass, rather than measuring ahead of the cutting. Hence, the Bessinger device may lead to the disadvantage of incompletely cutting the coal seam or cutting beyond the coal-rock boundary and into the rock before determining that the cutting operation had extended beyond the coal layer. If the leading drum has removed all the coal, the sensor cannot distinguish between the conditions of barely having removed all the coal to the interface to having removed some of the rock as well. On the other hand, if some coal is left so as to provide a basis for control, this residual coal is left unmined. Without being able to differentiate between these two cutting conditions, the control system does not know how to effectively respond and either may not respond fast enough or may respond inappropriately. The detector will not be able to determine if the control system has overreacted or under-reacted until the detector reaches the region that has been cut. More importantly for continuous miners, placement of a sensor in front of a cutter drum, as for the follower drum in Bessinger, et al., is obviously not possible.




Other sensors have been known to be positioned approximately where the schematically illustrated sensor D (

FIG. 1

) is shown on a mining machine. As with the Bessinger device, sensor D senses radiation after the cutting pass has occurred and cannot determine distance to the rock unless some coal is left through which measurements are made. Furthermore, the known sensors lack the requisite ruggedness to be properly positioned to accurately determine the coal-rock boundary.




Thus, there exists a need for an apparatus and method for protecting a sensor while accurately determining the boundary between a coal layer and a non-coal layer to maximize coal production and minimize production of non-coal byproducts.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




A solution to the above-noted disadvantages in conventional devices is to place a suitably sized sensor close to the actual target to be measured so that the view angle can be relatively large while encompassing mainly the region that needs to be measured. Speed of the movement of the cutter is controlled by the sensor for short, critical intervals in order to give time to complete measurements that will provide required accuracy while allowing the cutter to operate at maximum speed at other times. The size of the sensing element also factors in to measurement accuracy.




An aspect of the invention provides a structure for placing suitably sized gamma detectors in ideal locations required to achieve the needed accuracy and to make effective use of the measurements made in those locations. A practical problem is that the most desirable locations for the detectors are already used by spray systems used to reduce the hazards from dust. This problem has been solved by devising a way to incorporate the spray manifold and nozzles into an armored detector and to further make use of those spray capabilities to improve the survival capability of the detector assembly.




Another aspect of the invention provides a method of determining the distance from the cutter to the rock interface by accurately measuring the radiation passing through the coal that is between the cutter and the rock as the coal is being removed. Methods are provided for controlling the operation of the mining equipment to make use of this measurement capability.




A described embodiment of the invention provides an armored detector assembly for protecting sensing components used with mining equipment. The armored detector assembly includes a rugged housing including a defined interior space for housing sensing components for sensing signals in the mining environment. The housing includes at least one window adapted to provide protection to the sensing components from force and abrasion from objects while simultaneously allowing the sensing components to receive the signals associated with a region including a region being cut with the mining equipment.




Another described embodiment of the invention further provides a mining system with mining equipment and an armored detector assembly mounted on the mining equipment and for protecting sensing components used with the mining equipment. The armored detector assembly has a rugged housing including a defined interior space for housing sensing components for sensing signals in the mining environment. The housing includes at least one window adapted to provide protection to the sensing components from force from objects while simultaneously allowing the sensing components to receive the signals associated with a region including a region being cut with the mining equipment.




Another described embodiment of the invention provides a gamma detector assembly for use in mining. The assembly includes a scintillation element, a photomultiplier tube optically coupled to the scintillation element with a window, a power supply, logic elements, and an explosion proof enclosure which includes a cap gland, an explosion proof housing, and the window. The photomultiplier tube, power supply, logic elements, and other electronic elements are encased within the explosion proof enclosure.




Another described embodiment of the invention provides a method of mining including the steps of placing a sensor, which is capable of receiving signals in a mining environment including a target stratum, within a defined interior space of a rugged housing, positioning the housing on the mining equipment for sensing the signals, operating the mining equipment, and inhibiting the mining of any areas surrounding the target stratum.




These and other advantages and features will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention which is provided in connection with the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic view from a side of a continuous miner including an armored detector assembly constructed in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a top view of the armored detector assembly of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is a cross-sectional view taken along line III—III of FIG.


2


.





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional view taken along line IV—IV of FIG.


3


.





FIG. 5

is a cross-sectional view taken along line V—V of FIG.


2


.





FIG. 6

is a perspective view of the armored detector assembly of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 7

is a view of the bottom of the main assembly of the armored detector assembly of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 8

is a view of the top of the hatch assembly of the armored detector assembly of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 9

is a view of the bottom of the hatch assembly of the armored detector assembly of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 10

is a perspective view of an armored detector assembly in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 11

is a perspective view of the detector of the armored detector assembly of

FIG. 1

or FIG.


10


.





FIG. 12

is a cross-sectional view taken along line XII—XII of FIG.


11


.





FIG. 13

is a top view of an armored detector assembly constructed in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 14

is a perspective view of an armored detector assembly constructed in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 15

is a side view of a detector constructed in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 16

is a cross-sectional view of a portion of the detector constructed in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 17

is a schematic representation of a control panel constructed in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 18

is a schematic representation of boom speed adjusting elements constructed in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 19

is a schematic representation of a boom speed adjusting control valve constructed in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




An armored detector assembly


30


for housing sensing equipment


100


used in mining operations is illustrated attached to mining equipment


10


in FIG.


1


. The mining equipment


10


shown is a continuous mining machine. The mining equipment


10


includes a moveable boom


16


attached to a cutting drum


12


. The cutting drum


12


has an exterior surface


14


upon which are mounted cutting tools or picks


13


shown schematically. The mining equipment


10


further includes a chute


19


into which cut coal is shunted for further processing. The boom


16


is capable of being moved in the direction of arrows C while the mining equipment can move in the direction of arrows E perpendicular to the arrows C. At a lower extent of the mining boom


16


is a boom stop


17


. The boom


16


is prevented from moving downwardly past a certain point by the boom stop


17


which contacts the chute


19


.




Shown on the mining boom


16


of

FIG. 1

are two armored detector assemblies


30


,


430


. The nearest point on the boom


16


to the cutting drum


12


is at the front of the boom


16


, either at the top or the bottom edge. The armored detector assembly is advantageously located in an upper portion


18


of the boom


16


for detecting the roof coal-rock interface (not shown), or alternatively the armored detector assembly may be located in a lower portion


20


of the boom


16


for detecting a floor coal-rock interface


206


. Instead, and as illustrated, the armored detector assembly


30


is located in the lower portion


20


of the boom


16


and the armored detector assembly


430


is located in the upper portion


18


of the boom


16


. From either of the portions


18


,


20


the detector assemblies


30


,


430


have a view between the picks


13


on the cutting drum


12


to the respective floor or roof surface being cut, or a coal face


202


of a layer of uncut coal


200


. The uncut coal


200


is the target stratum for the operator of the mining equipment


10


.




The detector assemblies


30


,


430


further may be placed at any location laterally along the width of the mining boom


16


. There may be instances where the positioning of the detector assemblies


30


,


430


is more advantageous. For example, after the mining equipment


10


makes a first cutting pass, it may then reverse out from the coal face


202


, move laterally, and begin a second cutting pass. There will sometimes be overlap between the first and the second cutting passes. If the detector assemblies


30


,


430


are positioned so as to have a view of uncut coal, even with the overlap, the detector assemblies


30


,


430


may have a less obstructed viewing area.




Generally, coal is found in strata sandwiched between a layer of impervious shale above and a layer of a rock material


204


, such as, for example, fireclay below. Sometimes iron sulfide masses form in or beneath the shale layer. Iron sulfide masses are extremely dense, hard material which can damage the picks


13


. In addition to determining a coal-rock interface


206


between the layer of uncut coal


200


and the rock material


204


, the detector assembly


30


is capable of determining the presence of iron sulfide masses. Thus, positioning a detector assembly


30


n the upper portion


18


has the added benefit of inhibiting damage to the picks


13


by advising the operator of the mining equipment


10


of the nearby presence of iron sulfide masses.




As the picks


13


of the cutting drum


12


contact with the coal face


202


, some of the uncut coal


200


is cut and moved in a direction toward the chute


19


. Depending upon how the operator operates the mining equipment


10


, some mounds of uncut coal


200


may remain between the mining equipment


10


and the coal face


202


. The size of the mound depends upon the depth of the cut. For example, if the mining equipment


10


is sumped into the coal by approximately ⅔ the diameter of the cutting picks


13


, then the mound would be approximately as shown in


210


. But, if the equipment


10


is sumped into the coal by approximately the diameter of the cutting picks


13


, then the mound would be approximately as shown in


212


. Theoretically, the uncut coal area could approximate the area bounded by a theoretical cut coal line


214


, the picks


13


, and the coal face


202


. However, due to vibration of the mining equipment


10


and movement of the cutting drum


12


, some of the uncut coal generally breaks down and is shunted toward the chute


19


, leaving either the first uncut coal area


210


or the second uncut coal area


212


. It should be noted that the operation of the mining equipment


10


may not always be consistent, and so the mounds of uncut coal may vary between the first uncut coal area


210


and the second uncut coal area


212


.




Vibration levels are high throughout the mining equipment


10


, but are highest near the cutting drum


12


. In addition to the vibration due to the rotation of the cutting drum and the cutting action of the picks


13


against the coal face


202


, the cutting drum


12


continually throws materials being mined at and onto the boom


16


. Specifically, the cutting drum


12


, which rotates in the direction B, throws material toward the boom


16


. High force impacts from the materials thrown onto the boom


16


are abrasive and can substantially erode the steel plates used in the boom


16


. Any structure protruding from the surface of the boom


16


likely will be broken off due to the impacts from the thrown materials. Thus, the armored detector assembly


30


is formed of a material capable of being welded to the mining equipment


10


. Preferably, part or all of the armored detector assembly


30


is made from a high strength material, such as case hardened steel or a high strength steel alloy, that is adapted to highly attenuate gamma radiation. Further, the armored detector assembly


30


is affixed to the boom


16


such that it is flush with the surface of the boom


16


, either in portion


18


or portion


20


.




Referring now to

FIGS. 2-9

, wherein the armored detector assembly


30


is further illustrated.

FIG. 2

illustrates the armored detector assembly


30


from an end. As shown, the armored detector assembly


30


includes a main assembly


32


and a hatch assembly


74


. The main assembly


32


is defined on its exterior by a front surface


42


, a front sloping surface


36


, a top surface arch


40


, a back sloping surface


38


, a back surface


44


, a back undersurface


62


, a back shoulder


64


, an internal arch surface


66


, a front abutment undersuface


72


, a front shoulder


70


, and a front undersurface


68


. The front sloping surface


36


faces generally toward the viewing area bounded by the theoretical sight line


220


and the lower full view line


226


(FIG.


1


). The hatch assembly


74


is defined on its exterior by a front surface


90


, a forward surface


88


, a shoulder


86


, a top surface


84


, an arched surface


82


, a ledge


80


, a flange


76


having a back surface


78


, and an undersurface


92


.




The main assembly


32


fits against the hatch assembly


74


such that the back surfaces


44


,


78


are within the same plane and the front surfaces


42


,


90


are within the same plane. When so fitted, the flange


76


abuts the back portion undersurface


62


, the ledge


80


abuts the back shoulder


64


, the top surface


84


abuts the front abutment undersurface


72


, the shoulder


86


abuts the front shoulder


70


, and the forward surface


88


abuts the front undersurface


68


. Further, the edges of the arched surface


82


meet up with and contact the edges of the internal arch surface


66


to define a space into which the sensing equipment


100


is held. The placement of the sensing equipment


100


in a space between the main and base assemblies


32


and


74


places a significant portion of rugged housing between the sensitive sensing equipment


100


and the harsh cutting environment near the cutting drum surface


14


, specifically the back sloping surface


38


and top surface arch


40


of the main assembly


32


.




In addition to the structural features described above, the illustrated main assembly


32


contains a channel


58


which is in fluid connection to fluid equipment (not shown). Also located along the front slope


36


of the main assembly is at least one window opening


48


within a window


46


. Extending upwardly from the fluid channel


58


toward the front sloping surface


36


are a plurality of spray orifices


60


(see FIGS.


3


and


6


). At least one of the spray orifices


60


exits into the front sloping surface


36


at a location adjacent to the top surface arch


40


. Further, a spray orifice


60


exits into each window opening


48


, specifically into a back wall


54


, and are so positioned to remove some or all of the mining debris thrown up onto the window openings


48


from the mining operations.




The sloped features of the main assembly


32


, namely the front and back sloping surfaces


36


and


38


are so configured to deflect to some extent mining debris thrown up onto the armored detector assembly


30


. Specifically, since the cutting drum


12


rotates in the direction B, debris is thrown up at the detector assembly


30


generally in the direction of arrow F (FIG.


3


). Thus, the back surface


38


takes a majority of the force of the thrown debris, and the window openings


48


are shielded from the majority of the thrown debris. The main assembly


32


and the hatch assembly


74


are mechanically fastened together and are removable from one another to allow removal of the sensing equipment


100


.





FIG. 2

shows the armored detector assembly


30


from the top. Located on the front surface


36


of the armored detector assembly


30


adjacent to the top surface arch


40


is the window


46


consisting of four window openings


48


. Each window opening


48


, which is partially defined by the back wall


54


and a front wall


53


, is recessed into the main assembly


32


and contains a pair of apertures


50


within a window base surface


52


and separated by a window guard


56


. The window guards


56


are made from a high strength material and the window openings


48


are sized and configured to restrict the size of debris that impacts the window apertures


50


during mining operations. The window apertures


50


are underlain by a nonmetallic material


51


(

FIG. 7

) which is essentially transparent to radiation, such as urethane. Further included within the window openings


48


are side window panes


59


. (

FIGS. 2

,


6


), which allow radiation moving transverse to the window apertures


50


to be transmitted from one window opening


48


to another to prevent obstructing transverse radiation. Please note that the side window pane


59


is not shown in

FIG. 3

for clarity of illustration. The window openings


48


provide a recessed area within the front sloping surface


36


to provide added protection for the transparent material


51


underlying the window apertures


50


.




The detector assembly


30


is positioned such that the viewing area of the window openings


48


is bounded by an upper theoretical sight line


220


and a lower theoretical sight line


229


(

FIGS. 1

,


3


). As you will note, the upper theoretical sight line


220


extends from the front walls


53


through the cutting drum


12


, which severely attenuates the radiation information from the rock material


204


. The actual upper boundary is the upper full view line


222


which extends from the window apertures


50


and tangents the exterior surface


14


of the cutting drum


12


and extends through the pick region


13


. The maximum viewing of the detector assembly


30


, meaning the full viewing area of each of the window openings


48


is a full viewing area


228


bounded by the upper full view line


222


and a lower frill view line


226


. The full viewing area


228


is less than the area of viewing between the lower full view line


226


and the theoretical sight line


220


. Partial viewing by the detector assembly


30


is also possible between the lower full view line


226


and the lower sight line


229


(FIG.


1


). Full viewing between the lower fill view line


226


and the lower sight line


229


is inhibited by the back wall


54


of each window opening


48


.




Optimal collection of radiation information can be obtained from the full viewing area


228


. This is because coal being cut from the coal face


202


which is within the pick region


13


is less dense than the coal in the coal layer


200


and in the first and second areas of uncut coal


210


,


212


. This is due to cut chunks of coal being mixed up, and in motion in the pick region


13


. The less dense the coal is in the full viewing area


228


, the less the radiation from the rock


204


is attenuated before passing into the detector assembly


30


.




As the picks


13


approach the rock interface


206


, the boom


16


movement is slowed down which allows the picks


13


to remove most of the cut coal from region


228


. Although movement of the boom


16


is slowed, the rotational speed of the cutting drum


12


remains constant. This allows the coal cutting rate to be decreased, thereby allowing cut coal to be more sufficiently cleared by the picks


13


to the chute


19


.




Less reliable though still somewhat important radiation information may be obtained from the viewing area bounded by the lower full view line


226


and the lower sight line


229


. This information is more important when the picks


13


are at greater distances from the rock interface


206


, because that information is used in making the first logical decision to slow the motion of the boom


16


. The radiation information from this viewing area is less reliable when the picks


13


are closer to the rock interface


206


due to the variability of the sizes and configurations of the uncut coal areas


210


,


212


but the contribution from this region is proportionally small at this point in the cutting stroke.




An alternative embodiment of the present invention, shown in

FIG. 13

, is to place a grill


235


over the window apertures


50


in an armored detector assembly


230


. The grill


235


, which may be formed of a metallic or similarly high-strength material, has its openings filled with non-metallic material


151


transparent to radiation. The grill


235


attenuates only to a small degree the radiation signatures emanating from the rock material


204


. Through this arrangement, debris is inhibited from contacting the window apertures


50


without sacrificing the radiation information.





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional view of the armored detector assembly


30


showing the channel


58


in fluid connection with the spray orifices


60


. The spray orifices


60


connect with the channel


58


and extend toward front sloping surface


36


. The spray orifices


60


are arranged to optimize mining debris removal. Specifically, some of the fluid transported through the channel


58


exits the spray orifices


60


in the back walls


54


over the window apertures


50


. This fluid serves to wet debris which has collected within the window openings


48


. Wet debris becomes softer and more pliable, and the wetness thus inhibits the debris from becoming compacted against the window apertures


50


. Debris which becomes so compacted increases the force placed on the window apertures


50


and the underlying transparent material


51


, thereby increasing the likelihood that the transparent material


51


can be broken by material that is driven into the assembly by the rotating picks


13


.




The remainder of the fluid exits the spray orifices


60


which extend to the front surface


36


. This fluid provides a spray over the picks


13


to inhibit dust from remaining borne in the atmosphere. Coal dust is incendiary and can ignite from a spark. Sparks are often created in coal mines through the action of the cutting drum


12


against rock and metal, such as iron sulfide.





FIG. 5

shows another cross-sectional view of the armored detector assembly


30


. This view shows a scintillation element


110


housed in a thin housing


111


. A plurality of springs


118


are positioned between the housing


111


and a rigid enclosure


102


. As shown, there are six springs


118


. An elastomeric sleeve


108


, having a plurality of elastomeric ridges


104


, is exterior to the rigid enclosure


102


. This whole assembly fits within the area for the sensing equipment


100


. The springs


118


are absent directly beneath a transparent material


51


. An O-ring


67


extends around the transparent material


51


to seal the sensing equipment


100


from water and contaminants. A main sprayer


65


is also shown in fluid connection with the fluid channel


58


by way of a spray channel


63


. The main sprayer


65


sprays the coal to lessen the likelihood of a possible ignition of the coal dust.





FIG. 6

is a perspective view of the armored detector assembly


30


providing a different view of the exit of the spray orifices


60


within the: window openings


48


and into the sloping surface


36


, as well as of the side window panes


59


fitting within guards


61


. An alternative embodiment, as illustrated in

FIG. 10

, shows an armored detector assembly


130


having a main assembly


132


and a hatch assembly


174


. The major difference between the assembly


30


and the assembly


130


is the exit location of the spray orifices. In the armored detector assembly


130


, spray orifices


160


exit into the sloping front surface


36


at a position below the window openings


48


. Further, a fluid channel


158


extends through the hatch assembly


174


and is in fluid connection with the spray orifices


160


similar to the fluid channel


58


being in fluid connection with the spray orifices


60


.




Although not shown, it is contemplated that spray orifices could be likewise located adjacent to the window openings


48


and/or the window apertures


50


. For example, spray orifices may be located to either side and between each window opening


48


. Further, spray orifices may be positioned in the window base surface


52


and/or the window guard


56


.





FIG. 7

is a view from the bottom of the main assembly


32


. The window apertures


50


extend through the internal arch surface


66


. The transparent material


51


is positioned directly beneath the internal arch surface


66


at a location covering the window apertures


50


. The interior surface of the main assembly


32


contains a plurality of internal threaded openings


94


located along the back portion undersurface


62


, the front portion shoulder


70


, and the front portion abutment undersurface


72


. There are also a plurality of external threaded openings


96


located along the front portion undersurface


68


and the front surface


42


of the main assembly


32


.





FIG. 8

is a view from the top of the hatch assembly


74


. The hatch top surface


84


of the hatch assembly


74


contains a plurality of external threaded openings


96


located along the flange back surface


78


and hatch front surface


90


. The hatch assembly


74


also contains a plurality of internal threaded openings


94


located along the hatch shoulder


86


. Also shown is the arched surface


82


that supports the sensing equipment


100


. The external threaded openings


96


of the main assembly


32


(

FIG. 7

) match up with the external threaded openings


96


of the hatch assembly


74


(FIG.


8


), and each opening


96


is respectively connected to another opening


96


by way of a threaded connecting structure (not shown), such as, for example, screws, bolts, or the like. Each internal threaded opening


94


of the main assembly


32


(

FIG. 7

) also matches up and is connected to a respective internal threaded opening


94


of the hatch assembly


74


(

FIG. 8

) in a similar manner as the external threaded openings


96


.





FIG. 9

is a view from the bottom of the hatch assembly


74


which has a plurality of internal threaded openings


94


and external threaded openings


96


.




The exact positioning of the armored detector assembly


30


is determined by the physical characteristics of the mining equipment


10


. For example, the armored detector assembly


30


may be positioned along the mining boom


16


so as to optimize the operations of the sensing equipment


100


. One advantage of the illustrated embodiments is the location of the armored detector assembly


30


on the mining boom


16


close to the cutting drum


12


. Such positioning permits more precise determination of the coal-rock interface


206


. The armored detector assembly


30


may be welded to the mining boom


16


in the optimal location. As noted above, the armored detector assembly


30


is extremely rugged to allow closer placement to the cutting drum


12


.




Another advantage is that the channel


58


is connected to the fluid source of the mining equipment


10


, and with the spray orifices


60


minimizes the amount of debris covering the window openings


48


. The presence of the spray orifices


60


internal to the main assembly


32


and adjacent to the window openings


48


allows the debris to be continually removed, thus improving the accuracy of the radiation information obtained by the sensing equipment


100


. The use of a non-metallic low radiation attenuation material


51


beneath the window apertures


50


permits a greater amount of radiation information to reach the sensing equipment


100


.




Because the hatch assembly


74


and main assembly


32


are detachable, any damage that does occur to the sensing equipment


100


and the window openings


48


can be repaired or rectified through replacement easily. The hatch assembly


74


is welded flush with the surface of the mining boom


16


to resist being torn off during mining operations.




Referring to

FIGS. 11-12

and


16


, the sensing equipment


100


includes a scintillation crystal


110


, a photomultiplier tube


114


, and a power supply, a signal conditioner, and logic circuitry and software, all generically denoted as power and logic elements


116


, all being part of a radiation detector


100


. While a radiation detector is described as the sensing equipment


100


, other sensing equipment, such as light, infrared, radio wave, or acoustical sensors may be used to detect the presence of coal. Any sensing equipment capable of detecting signals, from the rock


204


or the coal


200


, which enhance the accuracy of determining the coal-rock interface


206


is suitable for the present invention.




The photomultiplier tube


114


and the power and logic elements


116


are housed within an explosion-proof enclosure


120


which includes an O-ring


122


, a window


124


, and a housing


126


. Other electronics may be included within the enclosure


120


, such as, for example, filtering and amplifier components (not shown). The enclosure


120


is itself within the elastomeric sleeve


108


(FIG.


12


). Power enters, and controls and signals exit, the enclosure


120


through a conduit


137


, which extends through a cap gland


128


(

FIG. 16

) into the enclosure


120


. The window


124


is preferably formed of sapphire; or any other material which is resistant to harsh physical environments and transparent to light impulses. The window


124


, along with a light pipe


135


, serves to optically couple the scintillation element


110


to the photomultiplier tube


114


and to seal the enclosure


120


at one end, while the O-ring serves to seal the enclosure


120


at the other end, thereby meeting the Mine Safety & Health Administration requirements for explosion-proof enclosures. In addition to the single sapphire window


124


, another window formed of a weaker material may be used to optically couple the scintillation element


110


with the enclosure


120


.




The positioning of the enclosure


120


within the elastomeric sleeve


108


provides certain advantages. First, the photomultiplier tube


114


and the power and logic elements


116


are made small to fit within the enclosure


120


so that they are dynamically isolated. Having the photomultiplier tube


114


and power and logic elements


116


all within the enclosure


120


allows these elements to function entirely within an electromagnetic interference-proofed housing which also meets explosion-proof standards. All of the signals from the logic elements


116


and the photomultiplier tube


114


are unaffected by the outside environment and thus free of electromagnetic interference, which is especially important when attempting to detect small levels of gamma radiation.




A critical aspect of designing a gamma detector for use near the cutting drum of a miner is to avoid the generation of noise added to the signal. Noise in the signals coming from a gamma detector in a mining environment originates in two ways. It can be mechanically induced or electrically induced. Mechanically induced noise can result when elements in the scintillation element move relative to each other, producing spontaneous emission of light. Similarly, the coupling mechanism between the scintillation element and the photomultiplier can be caused to move during vibration and produce light flashes. Parts within a photomultiplier tube can be made to vibrate, causing unwanted variations in the output that are also transmitted as signals. The present invention addresses these sources of mechanically induced noise by providing multiple levels of isolation from vibration and shock. Elements chosen for use in the detector


100


include a support system having a high resonant frequency. The current invention, in turn, provides for a significantly lower resonant frequency of the springs


118


that surround the scintillation crystal


110


within the rigid dynamic enclosure


120


. Additional isolation is provided by the elastomeric material


108


that surrounds the rigid dynamic enclosure


120


. The result of using this support system is to ensure that the resonant frequencies of the support elements, that surround the vibration sensitive elements, will not be dynamically coupled with the frequencies that are transmitted through the surrounding springs


118


. By so doing, the sensitive elements will be protected from high, damaging vibrations and shock. Conventional approaches rely on simple mechanical isolators which require a large amount of space that is not available in the most desired locations. Further, without the armor provided in the illustrated embodiments, enclosures designed in a conventional fashion would be quickly destroyed by the direct impact of mining materials.




The illustrated embodiment of the present invention also effectively solves the problem of electrically induced noise produced by electrical motors and other devices on the mining equipment. This is accomplished by placing critical electrical elements such as power supplies, amplifiers, filters, discriminators, gain adjustment circuits, logic circuits and other electronics (i.e., the power source and logic elements


116


) within a sealed enclosure


120


. Electronic elements within the enclosure


120


are shielded from electromagnetic emissions from mining equipment. Amplifiers within the enclosure


120


boost the strength of the signals before they are transmitted from the detector to the control system for the miner. These specially conditioned and stronger signals are then essentially immune to the induced electromagnetic radiation as they pass through ruggedized cables to the miner control systems. Mine safety requirements dictate that electrical and electronic equipment be housed in enclosures that are explosion-proof in order to prevent ignition of dust or gas that may be around the detector. One unique feature of the illustrated embodiment is that the detector


100


is configured so that the explosion-proof requirement is met at the detector. Having the explosion-proof enclosure


120


at the detector allows the electronics to be at the detector so that the sensitive, low level signals do not have to be transmitted outside the protective structures to electronics which have been located at some distance away, often many feet. In addition, the explosion-proof enclosure


120


is protected by the armor detector assembly


30


.




All this has been achieved in such a way so as to not require a large space, the small volume making it possible for the detector to be strategically placed near the target stratum. Explosion-proof boxes typically used to protect electrical systems on miners are so large that they generally do not survive in those locations.




Accuracy of the measurement of the thickness of the coal while it is being cut is dependent upon the speed of the measurement. In turn, the speed of the measurement is dependent upon the size and effectiveness of the scintillation crystal, or element,


110


and the openness of the view of the target material being cut. Conventional collimation techniques typically used to selectively allow radiation from one area to be measured while rejecting radiation from other areas generally are not effective for this application. Since the majority of gamma radiation in rock is of relatively low energy, the surface area of the scintillation element


110


is more critical than its volume because low energy radiation is generally captured near the surface of the element


110


. For a given volume, the ideal proportion of a cylindrical scintillation element


110


is one having a high length to diameter ratio. Since the target area under the long cylindrical cutting drum


12


is a relatively narrow strip along the length of the cutter, the main axis of the scintillation element


110


should be parallel with this strip. Specifically, the dimension of the crystal


110


in the direction perpendicular to the axis of the target strip should be small so as to provide sufficient shielding of the scintillation element


110


from radiation originating from directions other than the target of interest.




The dynamic support system for the scintillation element


110


preferably should be effective for a sodium iodide (NaI) crystal having a high length to diameter ratio since NaI crystals are easily fractured by vibration, shock, shear or bending forces. Radial springs running the length of the element


110


, and the springs


118


running the length of the shield


102


within which the scintillation element


110


is located provide this protection as well as prevent noise from being induced into the signal due to mechanical vibration.




Once the maximum-sized sodium iodide scintillation element


110


having a large length to diameter ratio has been properly supported to survive high vibration, another challenge is to provide mechanical shielding from objects being thrown against the detector


100


by the cutter drum


12


. Such shielding must be accomplished without seriously obstructing the view by any portions of the surface of the scintillation element


110


. This special viewing requirement has been accomplished by the guards


61


over the window area that allow most of the radiation along the length of the strip to reach points along the surface of the scintillation element without being obstructed by the guards. Internally to the detector, the radial springs


118


have been selectively used to minimize the attenuation of low energy radiation.




Collectively, these features, in addition to the special environmental protection afforded the electronics, allow for a highly sensitive detector that is capable of responding to the rapidly changing conditions as the coal is removed by the cutter drum


12


. To further maximize the accuracy of the measurement, however, the movement of the cutter drum


12


is slowed down as it approaches the rock. The time added to the cutting stroke by slowing the movement of the boom


16


near the coal-rock interface


206


may be only three or four seconds, allowing for an accurate, automatic cutting decision which results in an overall saving of time for the total cutting cycle.




The scintillation crystal


110


may be formed of any suitable material which is capable of transforming radiation to light impulses, or signals. Preferably, the scintillation crystal


110


is formed of sodium iodide, the material known to produce the greatest intensity of light output. A typical size for the scintillation element


110


is 1.42 inches in diameter by 10 inches in length. The light impulses are transmitted through the window


124


to the photomultiplier tube, which transforms the light impulses into electrical signals. The electrical signals are analyzed to determine the distance to the coal-rock interface


206


. For example, count rates above a pre-selected energy level are measured and compared with an input or calibrated reference, and the logical commands are issued to slow down the movement of the boom


16


and then to stop the boom


16


.




The elastomeric sleeve


108


is transparent to radiation, and hence, alters only minimally, if at all, the amount of radiation entering the sensing equipment


100


. A plurality of openings


106


extend through the housing


111


and the rigid enclosure


102


to allow radiation to enter into the sensing equipment


100


and be detected by the scintillation crystal


110


. The openings


106


correspond with the apertures


50


in the main assembly


32


of the armored detector assembly


30


.




By placing such electronic components within the enclosure


120


, noise is greatly reduced and transmission of a high voltage from an external source to the photomultiplier tube


114


is avoided.




As noted above, one consideration for the armored detector assembly


30


is lessening the vibration and shock, known to produce noise in the signal within the sensing equipment


100


, and especially within the scintillation crystal


110


. Thus, the scintillation crystal


110


, as well as the photomultiplier tube


114


and the power supply and logic elements


116


are encased within the elastomeric sleeve


108


which can absorb some of the noise producing vibration. The elastomeric sleeve


108


, which may be a silicone rubber, also serves to protect the scintillation crystal


110


from water and/or chemicals used by the miner


10


for controlling dust. Further, the plurality of springs


118


extending around the circumference of the housing


111


provide additional protection.




The springs


118


may be adjusted to achieve a desired resonant frequency within the shield


102


. Specifically, the springs


118


may be adjusted by altering their width, thickness, shape, and material type. By tuning the resonant frequency of the sensing equipment


100


with the springs


118


, either alone or in conjunction with another set of springs (not shown) directly surrounding the scintillation crystal


110


within the elastomeric sleeve


108


, the scintillation crystal


110


can be isolated from higher resonant frequencies and be inhibited from resonating with lower frequencies.




The springs


118


, which are nominally about 0.01 inches thick and about 0.75 inches wide, may be placed so that they extend partially over the openings


106


. The relative thinness of the springs


118


and their being supported by the elastomeric ridges


104


allows the springs


118


to extend over the openings


106


without adversely affecting the pathway of the incoming radiation at energies above approximately 80 kev. As illustrated in

FIGS. 5 and 11

, one of the springs


118


may be omitted over the openings


106


, thereby leaving a gap of about 0.75 inches wide. The springs


118


adjacent the gap will increase attenuation to low energy radiation (30-80 kev), but will have only a minor effect on the higher energy incoming gamma radiation.




The sensing equipment


100


is loaded into and unloaded from the detector assembly


30


by removing the hatch assembly


74


from the main assembly


32


. Alternatively, the sensing equipment


100


may be loaded into and unloaded from the detector assembly


30


through an opening


101


(FIG.


6


).




Referring to

FIG. 15

, the sensing equipment


100


may be fitted within an elastomeric sleeve


150


. The sensing equipment


100


has an end


103


, at which the scintillation crystal


110


is positioned, and a second end


105


, at which the power supply


116


is positioned. The sleeve


150


is placed over the end


103


. The sleeve


150


is formed of an elastomeric material which is transparent to radiation. The sleeve


150


includes a plurality of fins


152


which may taper toward the scintillation crystal


110


from the end


103


. The sensing equipment


100


is loaded within the detector apparatus


30


such that the sleeve


150


provides a wedge fit within the opening


101


.




In another alternative, as shown in

FIG. 14

, the sensing equipment


100


may be loaded into and unloaded from a detector assembly


330


through a front loading plate


331


. The plate


331


is within a main assembly


332


and extends from a front loping surface


336


to a back sloping surface


338


. Further, the plate


331


must extend a length sufficient to allow the sensing equipment


100


to be easily loaded and unloaded therethrough.




Once the mining equipment


10


begins cutting the coal face


202


, the scintillation crystal


110


takes in the radiation emanating from the rock material


204


. Optical pulses from the scintillation element


110


are converted into electrical pulses by the photomultiplier tube


114


. By counting the gross number of pulses (direct as well as scattered pulses), a determination is made as to the type of material that is being cut. Although there is some radiation emanating from the coal


200


, the amount is low in intensity as compared to the radiation coming from the rock


204


. As the boom


16


lowers the drum


12


, allowing the picks


13


to cut into the:coal


200


, the amount of radiation reaching the detector


100


increases due to the coal


200


being removed and reducing the absorption of the radiation emanating from the rock


204


. The radiation being measured will also be affected somewhat by the contour of the rock interface


206


such that an upturn of the interface


206


will increase the radiation being measured and a downturn will reduce the radiation being measure. Once the radiation from the rock


204


increases to a level selected by the operator, the detector logic elements


116


will issue a signal to slow the movement of the boom


16


to a predetermined rate. Such a slower rate provides more time for the detector to make more accurate measurements of the radiation levels. A second level may be selected by the operator that results in the boom


16


movement to be slowed even further, thus allowing even more accurate measurements. Finally, once an accurate measurement is made, the movement of the boom


16


is stopped.




Since the armored detector assembly


30


is welded flush with the mining equipment


10


, rocks and other debris are less likely to rip the armored detector assembly


30


from the mining equipment


10


. Any debris thrown up onto the window apertures


50


may be sprayed off, or at least wetted, with the spray nozzles


60


. While coal is still being detected, the mining equipment


10


continues to advance through the uncut coal


200


. Upon the sensing of a change in the radiation levels consistent with a change from coal to rock found at the coal-rock interface


206


, the mining equipment


10


is halted and a new cutting direction is taken based upon new radiation information being input into and interpreted by the scintillation crystal


110


, the photomultiplier


114


and the logic elements


116


.




Referring to

FIGS. 17-18

, another preferred embodiment is illustrated.

FIG. 17

shows a control panel


350


that is electrically connected to the logic elements


116


within the detector


100


. This control panel


350


allows the operator to input threshold values to the detector logic elements


116


. Once the radiation level reaches these threshold values, the movement of the boom


16


is reduced to increase the accuracy of the measurements. The logic elements


116


then make logical decisions and send control signals to control valves (to be described with reference to FIG.


18


). By use of a menu switch


358


, the operator may select each of the three threshold values, or set points, as indicated on a display


352


. Switches


355


and


356


allow the display to scroll through a range of values until the desired value is reached. The menu switch


358


is then used to select the next set point to be adjusted and the process is repeated until all the set points have been adjusted to the desired values.




A main control valve


362


, which is on a main line


361


and which is electrically controlled by the control panel


350


, leads into three hydraulic control valves


364


,


368


, and


372


in the embodiment illustrated in

FIG. 18. A

first flow adjusting line


363


includes a first control valve


364


and connects the main line


361


to a line


374


leading to a hydraulic cylinder (not shown). A second flow adjusting line


366


, which includes a second control valve


368


, also connects the main line


361


to the line


374


. A third flow adjusting line


370


, which includes a third control valve


372


, also connects the main line


361


to the line


374


.




The cutting drum


12


is set into operation by providing a cutting direction through a switch


357


on the control panel


350


normally used by the operator. The switch


357


may be located on the control panel


350


as shown, on a local control panel for the mining equipment


10


, on a remote control panel for the mining equipment


10


, or any combination of these. For clarity of description, it will be assumed that the main control of the boom


16


is with the switch


357


. At the start of the cutting cycle, all of the control valves


364


,


368


,


372


are open. As the cutting drum


12


nears the coal-rock interface


206


the radiation detector


100


senses an increase in gamma radiation, which translates into an increase in the number of pulses displayed on the display panel


353


of a pulse counter. Once the number of pulses reaches a first threshold set point selected by the operator using the control panel


350


, as previously described, a signal from the logic elements


116


from the detector


100


closes the first control valve


364


. This reduces the flow of hydraulic fluid thus reducing the cutting rate of the cutting drum


12


by slowing the rate at which the boom


16


descends (if cutting on a downstroke) or ascends (if cutting on an upstroke). The rate of descent, or ascent, of the boom


16


is known as the slew rate.




With the first control valve


364


closed, the slew rate is dependent on the control valves


368


,


372


of, respectively, the second and third flow adjusting control lines


366


,


370


. The slew rate with both control valves


368


,


372


open should be about two to three inches per second.




Upon the pulse count reaching a second predetermined set point, the logic elements


116


in the detector


100


send a second signal to close the second flow adjusting control valve


368


. This will drop the slew rate to about one-half an inch per second. Upon the pulse count reaching a third predetermined set point, which should be set to approximate the amount of pulses that are expected to be seen at the coal-rock interface


206


, a third signal from the counter


352


closes the third control valve


372


, stopping movement of the boom


16


.




As noted above, the menu control


358


allows an individual to input the various set points. The stand-by switch


360


allows the operator to take the radiation detector


100


out of the mining equipment


10


control loop.




If the operator chooses to stop the movement of the boom


16


, he releases the engagement of the boom control switch


357


. This closes the main control valve


362


, stopping the movement of the boom


16


. Upon stopping tie movement of the boom


16


, the three control valves


364


,


368


,


372


are returned to the open position. If the boom


16


was stopped prematurely, the operator can “bump” the boom


16


by briefly activating the directional control switch


357


. Further, if the third control valve


372


is closed, stopping the boom


16


, but a determination is made that there remains some distance to the coal-rock interface


206


, the operator can bump the directional control switch


357


. By doing so, the boom


16


will move until the gamma pulse counts are detected, approximately two seconds, at which point the movement of the boom


16


will again by halted by the closing of the third control valve


372


.




Instead of bumping the boom


16


, the operator has the option of activating the stand-by switch


360


, which isolates the pulse control


352


from the boom


16


. This allows a fully operator-controlled movement of the boom


16


, which is advantageous in circumstances where the cutting terrain is discontinuous, or where there are boulders or rocks in the way, or where there has been a roof collapse.




The menu control


358


is used to select and pre-set the various pulse count parameters. One envisioned embodiment provides a scrolling menu including a range of count rates. From this range of count rates are selected the three parameters used to slow and eventually stop the slew rate of the boom


16


.





FIG. 19

illustrates another embodiment of the control valves. Instead of three hydraulic control valves


364


,


368


,


372


, the main control valve


362


includes a single variable control valve


380


which allows for full flow, no flow, and increments of flow in between.




As is sometimes the case, the pulse counts registered from a radiation detector


100


positioned at the top portion


18


of the mining equipment


10


(and hence reading radiation through the roof) are different from the pulse counts from a radiation detector


100


positioned at the lower portion


20


(reading through the floor). Further, sometimes radiation count readings from, for example, the roof are “hot”, or high while the readings from the floor are somewhat indeterminate. Given that coal seams generally travel in a slightly undulating formation having a roughly equivalent thickness throughout, it is further envisioned that one of the radiation detectors


100


, coupled with a selected thickness value, can be utilized to more accurately mine the coal seam than is currently done by conventional methods.




For example, a potentiometer


500


(

FIG. 1

) may be placed at the back of the boom


16


. The potentiometer


500


is an effective instrument for knowing the position of the cutting drum


12


. By knowing where the coal rock interface


206


is from one of the radiation detectors and knowing that the thickness of the coal seam at that general location is an approximate thickness, the potentiometer


500


can be used to determine when the cutting should be halted on any cutting run where the readings from the other radiation detector


100


provide little guidance as to the location of the coal-rock interface


206


. While this embodiment has been described in terms of a pair of radiation detectors


100


, obviously the potentiometer


500


can be coupled with a single radiation detector


100


.




The present invention provides an armored detector assembly for use with mining equipment, such as continuous mining machines, for detecting coal and the boundary between a coal layer and a rock layer. While the invention has been described in detail in connection with the preferred embodiments known at the time, it should be readily understood that the invention is not limited to such disclosed embodiments. Rather, the invention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, while the invention has been described in terms of continuous mining machines, other mining equipment, such as longwall mining machines, may also be equipped with the invention. Additionally, although the present invention has been described in terms of coal mining operations, it is applicable in the mining operations of a variety of ores and minerals. Further, while four window openings


48


are shown, any number of window openings, having one or more window apertures


50


, may be used. Additionally, while various embodiments of the invention have been described, it is to be understood that aspects of the invention may include only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description, but is only limited by the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method for determining a thickness of a target solid mineral stratum, said method comprising:locating a sensing device, which is capable of receiving signals in a mining environment including the target solid mineral stratum, on mining equipment having a cutting element; cutting the target solid mineral stratum with the cutting element; controlling a slew rate of the cutting element along a direction of slew; continually receiving signals from a section of the mining environment directly ahead of the cutting element in the direction of slew and between the cutting element and an interface of the target solid mineral stratum and an adjacent stratum; and wherein said controlling of the slew rate is based upon the received signals and includes altering the slew rate from a first slew rate greater than zero to a second slew rate greater than zero.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said controlling of the slew rate comprises increasing from the first slew rate to the second slew rate.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the sensing device analyzes the received signals to determine a distance between the cutting element and the interface in the direction of cutting.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein said controlling of the slew rate comprises decreasing from the first slew rate to the second slew rate.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the slew rate of the cutting element is decreased based upon the distance between the cutting element and the interface in the direction of cutting.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the slew rate is intermittently halted and initiated based upon the distance between the cutting element and the interface in the direction of cutting.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the mining equipment includes hydraulic control valves, the slew rate being controlled by controlling the hydraulic control valves.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein said receiving signals from a section of the mining environment is accomplished in the direction of cutting of the cutting element.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the target solid mineral stratum includes coal.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the sensing device receives signals related to naturally occurring radiation.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the naturally occurring radiation includes gamma radiation.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the sensing device receives signals related to induced electromagnetic radiation.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein said receiving signals comprises receiving signals from the mining environment that is in the direction of said cutting by the cutting element.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, further comprising attenuating signals from other sections of the mining environment.
  • 15. The method claim of 14, wherein said attenuating of signals is accomplished with steel.
US Referenced Citations (25)
Number Name Date Kind
2752591 Felbeck et al. Jun 1956 A
3015477 Persson et al. Jan 1962 A
3019338 Monaghan et al. Jan 1962 A
3550959 Alford Dec 1970 A
3591235 Addison Jul 1971 A
4155594 Hartley et al. May 1979 A
4157204 Kissell et al. Jun 1979 A
4200335 Moynihan et al. Apr 1980 A
4262964 Ingle et al. Apr 1981 A
4323778 Wykes et al. Apr 1982 A
4367899 Whittaker et al. Jan 1983 A
4632462 Poling Dec 1986 A
4753484 Stolarczyk et al. Jun 1988 A
4968098 Hirsh et al. Nov 1990 A
4981327 Bessinger et al. Jan 1991 A
5072172 Stolarczyk Dec 1991 A
5092657 Bryan, Jr. Mar 1992 A
5121971 Stolarczyk Jun 1992 A
5181934 Stolarczyk Jan 1993 A
5188426 Stolarczyk et al. Feb 1993 A
5334838 Ramsden, Jr. Aug 1994 A
5357413 Mandall Oct 1994 A
5407253 Page et al. Apr 1995 A
5632469 Heun et al. May 1997 A
5769503 Stolarczyk et al. Jun 1998 A
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Larry G. Stolarczyk, Glenn G. Wattley and Andrew P. Schissler, The World of Smart Mining (May 2001).