This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(b) to European Patent Application EP 11166865.3, filed on May 20, 2011, the contents of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.
The present disclosure is related to microprobe devices, in particular to single shaft or arrays of neural probes containing embedded micro-electronic structures, such as CMOS structures.
Using thinner substrates or etching the probe tips to reduce the thickness leads to probes with insufficient mechanical properties to perform the required functions. Other techniques are known, such as anisotropic etching techniques which etch certain Si-planes faster than others. However, this is still a technically complex and time-consuming approach.
Overview
The disclosure is related to a method and probe arrays as described in the appended claims. The disclosure is thus related to a method for sharpening the tip of a microprobe, comprising, for example, the steps of:
According to an embodiment of the method, an array of said probes is provided, said array comprising a common base portion, and parallel probes extending outward from said base portion, at least the elongate shaft portions and chisel shaped tip portions of said probes having an essentially constant thickness extending between a first and second surface of the probe array, and the first surface of said array is attached to said second surface of the carrier, with the base portion and the majority of each shaft portion attached to the second surface, and the triangular chisel shaped tip portions being in close proximity to the edge, and wherein material is removed from the triangular tip portions of all of said probes.
According to an embodiment, at least part of said triangular, chisel shaped tip portion(s) is (are) extending outward from said edge, so that said part of the triangular tip portion(s) extend(s) below the first surface of the carrier when said first surface is held horizontally, and wherein substantially no material of the carrier is removed during said grinding step.
According to another embodiment, the probe(s) do(es) not extend outward from the edge, and wherein the carrier material and the probe tip material are removed simultaneously during said grinding step.
Said edge may be shaped as a straight line. Said probe(s) may be placed perpendicularly to said edge.
The location on the carrier block onto which the probe(s) is (are) attached may be provided with an alignment structure. Said alignment structure may comprise one or more grooves into which said probe or probes may be placed. Said alignment structure may be a negative imprint of the probe or probe array.
According to an embodiment, the grinding step is done by placing the carrier on a rotating grinding disc and applying pressure on the carrier. The grinding step may be followed by a polishing step.
According to an embodiment, the grinding step is continued so as to obtain a sharp pointed tip, lying in the plane defined by the second surface of the probe or probe array.
According to another embodiment, the grinding step is followed by the steps of:
According to an embodiment, the grinding step is done with a grinding surface having an average grain size between 5 μm and 20 μm.
These as well as other aspects, advantages, and alternatives, will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art by reading the following detailed description, with reference where appropriate to the accompanying drawings.
Various exemplary embodiments are described herein with reference to the following drawings, wherein like numerals denote like entities. The drawings described are schematic and are non-limiting.
Example embodiments of the method of producing such a probe array are illustrated in
As seen in
Then the carrier block/probe array combination may be subjected to a grinding step as illustrated in
Another example embodiment is illustrated in
Variants of the above-described embodiments are included in the scope of the appended claims. The edge 13 may be curved instead of straight. This allows the formation of probe tips of different shape and size in one grinding step. Likewise, instead of placing the probes of an array at the same distance to a straight edge 13, it is possible to place the array at an angle to the edge. Instead of an array of probes, a single probe may be sharpened by the method of the disclosure. The angle θ is a sharp angle, i.e. lower than 90°, and for example lower than 45°.
The carrier 10 may be but is not necessarily a solid block. The grinding step can be followed by a polishing step, which may release the stresses induced by the grinding process. The polishing step can be performed in the same tool as the grinding step, e.g. by applying another polishing disk onto the rotating table of a rotatable grinding tool.
Instead of grinding only from the backside of the probe or probe array, resulting in a pointed tip in the second surface 8 of the probe or probe array, it is also possible to grind from both sides resulting in a pointed tip located in between the first and second surface 7/8, and may be at the centre of the shaft's thickness. This can be done by grinding the probe in two steps: in the first step, the probe is attached by its first flat side 7 to the carrier block 10 as described above and a portion of the tip is removed by grinding and possibly polishing, for example until at least about half of the straight edge 100 is removed. Then the probe is removed, reversed and re-attached by its second side 8, and a second grinding and possibly polishing step is done until a sharp tip is obtained, said tip lying in between the first and second surface 7/8 of the probe. Both steps can be done by the method of the disclosure according to the embodiment of
The sharpness of the carrier's edge 13 may not be a crucial parameter. For example, it is possible to grind the tip of the probe while the carrier contains a blunt edge 13. Since the angle of the carrier 10 and the thickness of the tip are known one can calculate how far the chisel shaped tip 5 should extend from the edge 13.
It is pointed out that the method of the disclosure must be viewed with regard to methods in the same technical domain, i.e. the domain of microprobes. More specifically, this concerns probes that may have a thickness between about 30 μm and 100 μm and lengths ranging from 1 mm to a few centimeters, with micro-electronic structures mounted on one side of the probe. Even though the principle of sharpening a knife edge with the help of a wedge-shaped tool may be known, as for example illustrated by document U.S. Pat. No. 5,199,225, the effectiveness of such a method could not have been predicted in the field of microprobes. For instance, the fact that it is possible to sharpen probes of such microscopic dimensions without damaging the probes and/or the micro-electronic components could not have been expected. The following example proves the feasibility of the disclosed method, illustrating also that the coarseness of the grinding paper must be chosen carefully in order to avoid damage to the probes.
A test was performed with the following materials and steps:
An example method 900 in accordance with the present disclosure is depicted in
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, such illustration and description are to be considered illustrative or exemplary and not restrictive. Other variations to the disclosed embodiments can be understood and effected by those skilled in the art in practicing the claimed invention, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure and the appended claims. In the claims, the word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage. Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope.
The foregoing description details certain embodiments of the invention. It will be appreciated, however, that no matter how detailed the foregoing appears in text, the invention may be practiced in many ways, and is therefore not limited to the embodiments disclosed. It should be noted that the use of particular terminology when describing certain features or aspects of the invention should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being re-defined herein to be restricted to include any specific characteristics of the features or aspects of the invention with which that terminology is associated.
While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed herein, other aspects and embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The various aspects and embodiments disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting, with the true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11166865 | May 2011 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
165540 | Cashin | Jul 1875 | A |
2205964 | Taylor | Jun 1940 | A |
2389069 | Mascarenhas | Nov 1945 | A |
2443937 | Torteson | Jun 1948 | A |
2740240 | Rugels | Apr 1956 | A |
3910677 | Becker et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4430358 | Wada | Feb 1984 | A |
5155943 | Matsutani et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5199225 | Esposito | Apr 1993 | A |
5270543 | Visser et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5944592 | Hall et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6024629 | Takekoshi | Feb 2000 | A |
7412767 | Kim et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7462800 | Tunaboylu et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7959494 | Pietrzak | Jun 2011 | B1 |
20030064662 | Minami | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030090280 | Maekawa et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20050253606 | Kim et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070178814 | Sato et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080106292 | Chui et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080108221 | Kim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080220556 | Ko et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100155253 | Kim et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110217665 | Walsh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120083680 | Carr | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120196513 | Bagley et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130029564 | Yoshimura | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130072808 | Neves et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4107871 | Sep 1992 | DE |
0619983 | Oct 1994 | EP |
1884192 | Feb 2008 | EP |
2002341173 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003315563 | Nov 2003 | JP |
WO2010005479 | Jan 2010 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120295520 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |