Method for simultaneously recovering cobalt and manganese from lithium based battery

Abstract
The present invention relates to a method of simultaneously recovering cobalt (Co) and manganese (Mn) from lithium-based BATTERY, and more particularly, to a method that is capable of simultaneously recovering cobalt and manganese from lithium-based BATTERY, i.e., recycled resources that contain large amounts of cobalt and manganese, with high purities using multistage leaching and electrowinning methods. According to the method of the present invention, cobalt and manganese can be simultaneously recovered from lithium-based BATTERY as recycled resources, and a recovery method that is cost-effective compared to conventional methods can be provided.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a method of simultaneously recovering cobalt (Co) and manganese (Mn) from lithium-based BATTERY, and more particularly to a method that is capable of simultaneously recovering cobalt and manganese from lithium-based BATTERY, i.e., recycled resources that contain large amounts of cobalt and manganese, with high purities using multistage leaching and electrowinning methods.


BACKGROUND ART

Co and Mn have very similar physicochemical behaviors, and thus it is very difficult to separate and recover Co and Mn. Methods of separating Co and Mn include precipitation methods in which only Mn is selectively precipitated using an oxidizing agent or Co is selectively precipitated using Na2S, and solvent extraction methods in which Mn is recovered using di-(2-ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid (DEHPA) or Co is recovered using Cyanex 301.


However, all the above-described recovery methods have problems in that the use of an expensive oxidant is required to separately recover Co and Mn and in that the use of Cyanex 301 that is a very expensive solvent is required.


Therefore, the present invention is intended to overcome the above-described problems resulting from the use of expensive oxidants and extractants in the processes for separating and purifying Co and Mn from recycled resources containing Co and Mn, and is also intended to produce high-purity products by simultaneously recovering Co as Co metal and Mn as electrolytic manganese dioxide (EMD).


DISCLOSURE
Technical Problem

The present invention has been contrived to overcome the above-described problems of the conventional art, and an object of the present invention is to provide a method that is capable of simultaneously recovering cobalt and manganese, which are contained in lithium-based BATTERY, i.e., recycled resources, in large quantities, with high yields in a cost-effective manner.


Technical Solution

To order to overcome the above technical problem, the present invention provides a method of simultaneously recovering cobalt and manganese from lithium-based BATTERY, the method including:


(1) heat-treating the lithium-based BATTERY;


(2) grinding the heat-treated BATTERY to obtain ground particles, and separating particles having a particle size of 12 mesh or less from the ground particles;


(3) subjecting the separated particles to multistage leaching;


(4) adding 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester (PC88A) to a product of the multistage leaching to obtain an electrowinning solution;


(5) subjecting the electrowinning solution to electrowinning using circulation-type electrodes, the electrodes including a cathode made of stainless steel and an anode made of a 93% Pb-7% Sn alloy; and


(6) washing.


The lithium-based BATTERY is preferably a mixture of lithium-ion BATTERY and lithium primary BATTERY.


The electrowinning is preferably performed in an electrolytic cell at a pH of 2 or more.


The electrowinning is preferably performed in an electrolytic cell at a current density of 0.025-0.065 A/cm2.


The electrowinning is preferably performed in an electrolytic cell at a temperature of 30-60° C.


The concentration of cobalt ions in the electrowinning is preferably 15-20 g/L or higher.


The washing is preferably performed using sulfuric acid.


Advantageous Effects

According to the method of the present invention, cobalt and manganese can be simultaneously recovered from lithium-based BATTERY, i.e., recycled resources, and a recovery method that is cost-effective compared to conventional methods can be provided.







MODE FOR INVENTION

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail.


The present inventors have conducted extensive studies to solve the problems of the conventional methods of recovering cobalt and manganese from lithium-based BATTERY using expensive oxidizing agents and, as a result, have developed a method that is capable of simultaneously recovering cobalt and manganese with high efficiency by multistage leaching and electrowinning at a specific pH, temperature and current density, thereby completing the present invention.


Accordingly, the present invention provides a method of simultaneously recovering cobalt and manganese from lithium-based BATTERY, the method including:


(1) heat-treating the lithium-based BATTERY;


(2) grinding the heat-treated BATTERY to obtain ground particles, and separating particles having a particle size of 12 mesh or less from the ground particles;


(3) subjecting the separated particles to multistage leaching;


(4) adding 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester (PC88A) to a product of the multistage leaching to obtain an electrowinning solution;


(5) subjecting the electrowinning solution to electrowinning using circulation-type electrodes, the electrodes including a cathode made of stainless steel and an anode being made of a 93% Pb-7% Sn alloy; and


(6) washing.


It is preferred that the lithium-based BATTERY be lithium-ion BATTERY or a mixture of lithium-ion BATTERY and lithium primary BATTERY.


In a preferred embodiment, the lithium-based BATTERY may be a mixture of lithium-ion BATTERY and lithium primary BATTERY mixed at a mass ratio of 4:1.


In a preferred embodiment, the heat treatment of the lithium-based BATTERY may be performed in a heat-treatment furnace at 500° C., after lithium-ion BATTERY and lithium primary BATTERY are mixed at a ratio of 4:1 and inert gas is injected into the heat-treatment furnace at a rate of 1 L/min.


In a preferred embodiment, the multistage leaching may be performed by referring to the conventional art, for example, a method of producing cobalt-manganese-bromine (CMB) from a ternary cathode active material, or a method of producing CMB from waste CMB catalysts. More specifically, in first-stage leaching, powder having a particle size of 12 mesh or less may be subjected to sulfuric acid reductive leaching using 5-10% hydrogen peroxide at a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:1, a sulfuric acid concentration of 0.5-2 M, a temperature of 50-80° C., and a stirring speed of 150-400 rpm. After the first-stage leaching, using a filtrate obtained by solid-liquid separation as a leaching agent, the powder having a particle size of 12 mesh or less may be subjected to second-stage leaching using 5-10% hydrogen peroxide at a temperature of 50-80° C. and a stirring speed of 150-400 rpm.


The electrowinning is preferably performed in an electrolytic cell at a pH of 2 or more. If the pH is less than 2, problems occur in that the yield of cobalt is low and it is difficult to maintain a current efficiency of 90% or more. The electrowinning is preferably performed at a current density of 0.025-0.065 A/cm2, most preferably 0.05 A/cm2. The reason for this is that at this current density, the yield is high and the cobalt sheet can be very smooth.


In the electrowinning process, the temperature of the electrolytic cell is preferably 30 to 60° C., and most preferably 50 to 60° C. in terms of the yield and the current efficiency.


If the electrowinning process is performed in a single electrolytic cell, the concentration of Co ions in the electrolytic cell during the electrowinning process will be reduced, and thus a problem arises in that the current efficiency for production of Co metal decreases with an increase in the current density. In addition, hydrogen ions will be generated in the cathode to cause a reaction that competes with the reaction for production of Co metal, thus reducing the current efficiency for production of Co metal. Accordingly, to solve such problems, a circulation-type electrolytic cell is used in the present invention. A solution feed tank functions to prevent the concentration of Co ions from decreasing, and a pH adjustment tank functions to increase the pH of the reduced solution from the electrolyte by adding a Na2CO3 solution thereto. The reactions in the cathode and anode of the electrolytic cell of the present invention are as follows:


Reaction in Cathode:

Co2++2e→Co  (1)
2H++2e→H2↑  (2)


Reaction in Anode:

Mn2++2H2O→MnO2+4H++2e  (3)


The washing is preferably performed using sulfuric acid. In a preferred embodiment, the washing using sulfuric acid includes washing the obtained electrolytic manganese dioxide (EMD) using sulfuric acid at a certain concentration, for example, a concentration of 1M, 2M or 3M. More specifically, the washing may be performed at a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:10, at room temperature and at a stirring speed of 150-250 rpm.


Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail via examples.


EXAMPLES

1: Simultaneous Recovery of Co Metal and Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide (EMD)


1-1: Preparation of Electrowinning Solution


Lithium-based BATTERY obtained by mixing lithium primary BATTERY and lithium-ion BATTERY at a mass ratio of 1:4 were heat-treated. The heat-treated BATTERY were crushed and ground with Shredder and pin mills, and separated into powder having a particle size under 12 mesh and powder having a particle size over 12 mesh. The separated battery powder having a particle size under 12 mesh was subjected to multistage leaching. With respect to the solution resulting from the multistage leaching, Co and Mn were separated and concentrated from Ni using PC88A.


A coconut tree-derived activated carbon for liquids was used to remove organic materials from the solution shown in Table 3 below, thereby obtaining a solution for electrowinning. The composition of the solution is shown in Table 3 below.









TABLE 1







Contents of valuable metals in lithium-based battery particles


separated into under and over 12 mesh (wt %)















Co
Mn
Ni
Li
Cu
Fe
Al


















Under 12 mesh
16.24
0.28
2.38
3.18
4.83
2.70
9.07


Over 12 mesh
0.54
0.16
0.58
0.009
0.59
4.25
24.91
















TABLE 2







Results of multistage leaching of powder having


particle size under 12 mesh (mg/L)















Co
Mn
Ni
Li
Cu
Fe
Al


















First-stage leaching
18700
270
880
5340
5310
3100
7840


Second-stage
23010
690
1300
6200
200




leaching
















TABLE 3







Composition of electrowinning solution (recovery and concentration of


Co and Mn by solvent extraction and removal of organic materials by activated carbon)





















Co
Mn
Ni
Li
Cu
Fe
Pb
Cd
Zn
Ca
Mg
Al
pH
























Stripped
72 g/L
1.7 g/L
12
1.3
175
0
0
0
0
0
0
6.7
2.47


solution


Stripped
72 g/L
1.7 g/L
12
1.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.47


solution after


removal with


activated


carbon









1-2: Electrowinning


As the electrodes used in an electrowinning experiment, the cathode was made of stainless steel (SS), and the anode was made of a 93% Pb-7% Sn alloy. An electrolytic cell having one cathode and one anode was used, and a heater was also provided in order to prevent the temperatures of the electrolytic cell and a solution feed tank from being lowered. In addition, a pH meter was disposed in each of the electrolytic cell, the solution feed tank and a pH adjustment tank. Furthermore, in order to adjust the fed solution and the solution in the electrolytic cell to a desired pH, a pH sensor was disposed in the pH adjustment tank so that the pH would be automatically adjusted and a Na2CO3 solution would be automatically fed from a Na2CO3 storage tank to the pH adjustment tank. The electrowinning experiment was performed at varying current densities, temperatures and pHs.


1-3: Washing


Electrolytic manganese dioxide (EMD) resulting from Example 1-2 was washed with sulfuric acid. In this case, sulfuric acid used in the washing was used at a concentration of 1-3 M.


2: Results of Simultaneous Recovery of Co Metal and EMD


2-1: Recovery of Co Metal and EMD at Varying pHs


Table 4 shows the current efficiencies and yields of Co metals at varying pHs. The experiment was performed for 12 hours while the current density and the temperature were maintained at 0.025 A/cm2 and 60° C., respectively. As a result, it was determined that it was most preferable to maintain the pH in the electrolytic cell at 2 or more in order for a current efficiency of 90% or more to appear. At pHs below 2, current efficiencies of 69%, 77.2%, 80.8% and 88.3% appeared at pHs of 0.8, 1, 1.5 and 1.8, respectively. The reason for this is that the generation of hydrogen gas in the cathode was competitive with the reaction for production of Co metal, and thus the decrease in the pH in the electrolytic cell resulted in the decrease in the current efficiency. Therefore, it was determined that at a pH of 2 in the electrolytic cell, hydrogen ions in the solution can be reduced and the current efficiency can be maximized.


In the case of EMD, since the content of Mn in the solution was lower than the content of Co, all Mn was recovered as EMD, and the concentration of Mn in the solution after electrowinning was shown to be 1 mg/L or less.









TABLE 4







Results of experiment on current efficiencies of Co metal and EMD


at varying pHs (12 hours, 0.025 A/cm2, and 60° C.)









pH














0.8
1
1.5
1.8
2
3.5


















Co
Yield (g)
16.931
18.943
19.827
21.667
23.016
22.760



Current
69
77.2
80.8
88.3
93.8
92.9



efficiency



(%)









2-2: Recovery Efficiencies of Co Metal and EMD at Varying Current Densities


Tables 5 and 6 show current efficiencies and Co purities at varying current densities and a fixed temperature and pH. The current efficiency was 90% or more at all the current densities, and the loss of Co electrodeposited on the anode was about 1.2 g. In addition, the purity of Co was 99.8% or more. Accordingly, it appeared that the electrowinning of Co had no connection with current density. However, it could be seen that the surface of the produced Co sheet was very smooth at a current density of up to 0.05 A/cm2 when the produced Co sheet was examined but slight irregularities were formed on the produced Co sheet when a current density of 0.065 A/cm2 was applied. This is a phenomenon that occurred because the applied current was localized to the cathode. Accordingly, a current density of 0.05 A/cm2 could give the most satisfactory results.









TABLE 5







Results of experiment on Co metal and EMD at varying


current densities (12 hours, 60° C., and pH 2)









Current density













0.025
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.065



A/cm2
A/cm2
A/cm2
A/cm2
A/cm2
















Yield
18.07 g
 21.5 g
28.09 g
34.30 g
44.07 g


Current
98.2
97.4
95.4
93.2
92.1


efficiency


Co loss
1.212 g
1.181 g
1.231 g
1.220 g
1.231 g
















TABLE 6







Co purities at varying current densities in electrowinning (%)




















Co
Mn
Ni
Li
Cu
Fe
Pb
Cd
Zn
Ca
Mg
Al























0.025 A/cm2
99.93
0.005



0.031
0.026







 0.03 A/cm2
99.96
0.004
0.001


0.001
0.03







 0.04 A/cm2
99.95
0.007



0.0026
0.031







 0.05 A/cm2
99.92
0.008
0.018


0.0045
0.043







0.065 A/cm2
99.86
0.07
0.012

0.001
0.0038
0.053














2-3: Recovery Efficiencies of Co Metal and EMD at Varying Temperatures


Tables 7 and 8 show experimental results at varying temperatures at a fixed current density of 0.05 A/cm2 and a fixed pH of 2 in the electrolytic cell. In the experiment performed at a temperature ranging from 30° C. to 60° C., Co metal was sufficiently electrodeposited on the cathode, and thus all the produced Co metal showed a purity of 99.9% or more.









TABLE 7







Electrowinning experiment at varying temperatures













Temperature (° C.)
30
40
50
60

















Yield (g)
2.898
10.73
35.15
35.04



Current efficiency
94.5
94.8
95.5
95.2



(%)



Co loss (g)

0.2
1.271
1.230

















TABLE 8







Co purities at varying temperatures in electrowinning (%)



















Temperature














(° C.)
Co
Mn
Ni
Li
Cu
Fe
Pb
Cd
Zn
Ca
Mg
Al





30
99.99
0.003












40
99.95
0.002
0.014


0.0036
0.024







50
99.93
0.007
0.012


0.0088
0.043







60
99.94
0.004
0.018



0.037














2-4: Results of Washing of Recovered EMD


In all the experiments, the concentration of Mn in the solution was significantly lower than that of Co, and thus Mn in all the experiments was could be recovered as EMD after 12 hours. Accordingly, the current efficiency for Mn could not be determined. EMDs obtained in the experiments were mixed, and the components of the EMD mixture were analyzed. As a result, the EMD mixture showed an EMD purity of 95.24%, and contained 3.3% Co as the largest impurity and 1.21% Pb. To wash out such impurities, an EMD washing experiment was performed using varying concentrations of sulfuric acid. The results of the experiment are shown in Table 9. It can be seen that Co could be removed in small amounts as the concentration of sulfuric acid increased, but Pb was scarcely removed. However, the purity of the recovered EMD increased to 97% or more after washing.









TABLE 9







Purity of Recovered EMD (%)




















EMD
Co
Ni
Li
Cu
Fe
Pb
Cd
Zn
Ca
Mg
Al























Anode
95.24
3.3



0.25
1.21







(%)


1M
97.16
1.7




1.14







sulfuric


acid


2M
97.22
1.6




1.18







sulfuric


acid


3M
97.64
1.2




1.16







sulfuric


acid









3. Conclusion

Co metal and EMD could be simultaneously recovered from a single energy source without separating Co and Mn.


Furthermore, to increase the recovery rate of CO and current efficiency, studies regarding varying pHs in the electrolytic cell, varying temperatures and current densities were conducted. As a result, it was necessary to maintain the pH in the electrolytic cell at 2 or more in order to increase the current density, in which case a current efficiency of about 93% or more appeared. In order to increase the generation rate of Co metal, it was most preferable to apply a current density of 0.05 A/cm2.


In all the cases, the purity of Co was 99% or higher, and Mn in the solution could be recovered as EMD after 12 hours.


The purity of the recovered EMD was 95.24%, but a small amount of the impurity Co was washed out in the experiment of washing with sulfuric acid, and thus the purity of EMD slightly increased to 97% or higher. Pb was rarely removed.

Claims
  • 1. A method of simultaneously recovering cobalt and manganese from a lithium-based battery, the method comprising: (1) heat-treating the lithium-based battery;(2) grinding the heat-treated battery to obtain ground particles, and separating particles having a particle size of 12 mesh or less from the ground particles;(3) subjecting the separated particles to multistage leaching;(4) adding 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester (PC88A) to a product of the multistage leaching to obtain an electrowinning solution;(5) subjecting the electrowinning solution to electrowinning using circulation-type electrodes, the electrodes including a cathode made of stainless steel and an anode made of a 93% Pb-7% Sn alloy, wherein the electrowinning is performed in an electrolytic cell at a pH of 2 or more, a current density of 0.025-0.065 A/cm2 and temperature of 30-60° C.; and(6) washing and simultaneously recovering cobalt metal and electrolytic manganese dioxide (EMD).
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the lithium-based battery comprises a lithium-ion battery and a lithium primary battery.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein a concentration of cobalt ions in the electrowinning is 15-20 g/L or higher.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the washing is performed using sulfuric acid.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10-2015-0006457 Jan 2015 KR national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/KR2015/000757 1/23/2015 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2016/114439 7/21/2016 WO A
US Referenced Citations (1)
Number Name Date Kind
6086691 Lehockey Jul 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (19)
Number Date Country
101270415 Sep 2008 CN
102665912 Sep 2012 CN
102694163 Sep 2012 CN
102828206 Dec 2012 CN
103168107 Jun 2013 CN
104037468 Sep 2014 CN
104264184 Jan 2015 CN
0409792 Jan 1991 EP
2450991 May 2012 EP
04-099293 Mar 1992 JP
2000-036304 Feb 2000 JP
2005-149889 Jun 2005 JP
2008-007801 Jan 2008 JP
2012-092447 May 2012 JP
2012-204343 Oct 2012 JP
2013-199692 Oct 2013 JP
2013-538936 Oct 2013 JP
10-2003-0073820 Sep 2003 KR
10-2011-0062307 Jun 2011 KR
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
Wankat, Philip, “Equilibrium Staged Separations”, Section 18.11 Leaching, Prentice Hall, 1988, pp. 619-623 (Year: 1988).
Kumar et al, Prospects for solvent extraction processes in the Indian context for the recovery of base metals. A review, Hydrometallurgy, vol. 103, No. 1-4, Jun. 2010, pp. 45-53 (Year: 2010).
Devi et al, Separation of divalent manganese and cobalt ions from sulphate solutions using sodium salts of D2EHPA, PC 88A and Cyanex 272, Hydrometallurgy, vol. 54, No. 2-3, Jan. 2000, pp. 117-131 (Year: 2000).
Tripathy et al, Effect of manganese(II) and boric acid on the electrowinning of cobalt from acidic sulfate solutions, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, vol. 32, No. 3, Jun. 2001, pp. 395-399 (Year: 2001).
Mulaudzi et al, Direct cobalt electrowinning as an alternative to intermediate cobalt mixed hydroxide product, The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Seventh Southern African Base Metals Conference, Sep. 2-6, 2013, White River, Mpumalanga, South Africa (Year: 2013).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170009358 A1 Jan 2017 US