The present invention relates to an apparatus for the sink-and-float separation of mineral raw materials and to a method for the sink-and-float separation of mineral raw materials.
For the processing of mineral raw materials and their separation from undesirable accompanying constituents, for example for the separation of the debris constituents contained in raw coal and the clean coal, various separating methods are known which separate the various constituents of the raw material on the basis of their different specific weights, for example dynamic methods such as cylinders or cyclones, in which dense medium rotates and forms a vortex, or jigs, but also static methods with washing drums (sink-and-float separating apparatuses). For the processing of fine-grained mineral mixtures, in particular raw coal fractions as well, for example smaller than 12 mm, virtually only dynamic separating methods with cylinder or cyclone were suitable hitherto if a high separation grade was required, but said dynamic separating methods have the disadvantage of a low delivery and throughput capacity with high specific consumption of energy and pulp throughput. Although it was possible to achieve higher capacities with jigs and sink-and-float separation apparatuses, the separation grade to be achieved with these apparatuses and corresponding methods was inadequate.
This situation is explained by the table below, in which technical classification figures of some separating methods for coal are compared. In this case, the DWP cylinder represents cylinders and the DSM cyclone represents cyclones, and the washing drum represents a sink-and-float separating apparatus, the values specified applying to the processing of a grain fraction of 3 to 12 mm with cylinder and cyclone and of coarse coal with the washing drum. The values for the processing of the grain fraction of 3 to 12 mm with the washing drum would be considerably poorer. The characteristic figure according to Terra ET, which was determined from the partition curve according to Tromp, was selected as a measure of the separation grade. In this case, the ET values of 0.04 for cylinder and cyclone are nearer to theoretical target values which can scarcely be reached in practice.
Apparatuses and methods described at the beginning have been disclosed by DE 11 93 892 and DE 33 27 040.
Apparatuses and methods described at the beginning have also been disclosed by DE 968 121, the apparatus additionally having a second inlet and outlet pair for the liquid below the liquid level. In the method described therein, the bottom liquid flow is so strong that it drives heavy material into the region of the scoop feeders, arranged laterally on the end face of the drum, for the sink-product/heavy-material discharge and acts as a transport flow for heavy material. In this case, float product adhering to the heavy material may be discharged with the sink product, as a result of which the yield drops.
The present invention is based on the technical problem of developing an apparatus with which mineral raw materials, in particular coal of small-grained fractions, can be separated according to density from undesirable accompanying constituents and with which a high separation grade and capacity can be achieved with a low specific consumption of energy and throughput of operating media, and to propose a method with which this object can be achieved.
With the apparatus proposed, it is possible to build up a dense-medium bath with a steady, uniform flow from the inlet side of the separating vessel to the outlet or overflow side. In order to avoid disturbing effects on the uniform flow, the discharge drum is only rotated slowly. In particular, care is also to be taken to ensure that the same pulp quantities are fed and discharged at the bottom inlet and outlet so that the flow runs horizontally and no vertical flows are superimposed.
With the apparatus proposed, with values which were otherwise the same as with the conventional washing drum for coarse coal, it was possible to process a grain fraction of 3 to 12 mm with an ET of 0.02 and thus a very good separation grade. It was even possible, although with half the feed quantity of 70 m3/h, to separate a coal grain fraction of 1 to 3 mm having a very clean end product, which indicates a high degree of separation.
The deflecting barriers proposed in a special embodiment cause the float product floating at the surface to plunge into the dense-medium bath, as a result of which the grains perform a movement relative to the dense medium and in the process are separated from sink-grain fractions possibly still adhering or from enclosed sink-grain fractions, so that one can subsequently float up again in separated form. The rear deflecting barrier in the direction of flow has the advantage that it divides the float-product layer and reduces the thickness of the float-product layer, as a result of which the heavy material is liberated from the surrounding float product and can sink unhindered. The course of the bottom edge of the deflecting barrier parallel to and just below the liquid level has the advantage that the dense-medium flow is deflected in a way that does not disturb the uniform and essentially laminar flow.
In a preferred embodiment, the plate of the rear deflecting barrier in the direction of flow has corrugations arranged parallel to one another, so that on the bottom of the corrugation profile only relatively small float-product layers form, which with their small surface size, influence and decelerate the flow to only a minimum extent. The corrugations may have both a rounded-off profile and a V-shaped profile. The height of the arrangement of the rear deflecting barrier is advantageously empirically set in such a way that a desired fraction of the float product is caught by the deflecting barrier and forced downward into the bath. An expedient control variable for the fraction to be caught is the separation grade of the separated material, which is expediently to be determined at the overflow.
In a special embodiment, the top inflow line for the dense medium extends over the entire bath width. An essential precondition for the formation of a uniform flow over the entire bath width is thus provided. This can be arranged in an especially advantageous manner if the inlet device permits the control of the flow profile over its width. This is possible, for example, by an inlet device which consists of a vessel extending over the bath width and having at least one inlet opening and, toward the separating vessel, a multiplicity of equispaced openings, the cross section of which can be specifically reduced from inside. This may be effected, for example, by screens which are arranged inside the vessel and can be operated from outside and with which the free cross sections of the individual outlet openings can be specifically covered, as a result of which the discharging liquid flow is reduced. With such an apparatus, discontinuities or disturbances of the flow which are observed during operation can be specifically countered.
In a further special embodiment, the apparatus, for the delivery of the raw material to be separated, has a chute which is inclined towards the separating vessel and which has a plate which is arranged on the base and consists of a profiled material corrugated in the longitudinal direction, the end of this chute being arranged at an adjustable distance above the liquid bath. The inclination of the chute and the arrangement of its end above the liquid bath causes the raw material to be delivered onto the liquid bath, at a speed adjustable by the inclination, and to plunge into said liquid bath. The corrugated design of the chute base leads to a reduction in the frictional resistance and thus in the braking effect of the base layer. The spraying of the feed material with water assists the discharge of the raw material from the chute and dilutes the dense medium in the region of the raw-material delivery, thereby favouring the heavy-material constituents to sink. It is also important that the first deflecting barrier is arranged in such a way that it lies downstream of the trajectory parabola of the feed material, so that the latter does not hit the deflecting barrier, a factor which would lead to a reduction in the feed rate and thus to a reduction in the depth to which the raw material plunges into the dense-medium bath.
The uniform distribution of a large number of sink-product pockets over the circumference of the drum shell causes the sink product to be correspondingly distributed over the various sink-product pockets and ensures that the pockets are not filled unevenly or to an excessive degree. The liquid-permeable design of the walls of the sink-product pockets, together with the small extent the pockets are filled with the sink product, ensures that no liquid is skimmed off when a sink-product pocket is lifted out of the liquid bath and that the liquid level is not greatly affected by the only slight displacement volume of the pocket contents.
The formation of two horizontal liquid flows has the advantage that the float product is conveyed to the overflow with the top liquid flow, and the sink product is caught by the flow at two different bath heights and is moved relative to the dense medium, whereby the separated heavy material can sink and adhering float product can be released and can float up. The extent to which the heavy material is caught by the flow is increased by the flow deflection. The delivery of the raw material at high speed to the liquid bath and the deep plunging of the sink-p product fractions caused thereby favours the separation of the heavy-material fractions from adhering float-product grains, which is also intensified by the spraying of the raw material with water and by the resulting dilution of the dense medium in the region of the raw-material delivery.
The advantages of the invention are explained in the description of an exemplary embodiment, which is shown in the attached drawing, in which:
A partly sectioned sink-and-float separating apparatus is shown in perspective representation in
The front view of a sectioned apparatus during operation is shown in
The bottom pulp inlet 11 and the outlet opening, arranged opposite it at the same height, of the bottom pulp outlet 12 can readily be seen in this representation. The sinking heavy material is caught by the horizontal pulp flow formed between the pulp inlet and the pulp outlet and is moved once again relative to the dense medium, which promotes further separation of the sink-product fractions from adhering float-product fractions. After this second separating stage, the float product rises again in order to be combined with the top pulp flow and discharged toward the overflow weir 13. The cover plates 5 arranged in the top rear region and the pulp-bath boundary plates 14 can also be clearly seen.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
101 16 027 | Mar 2001 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB02/02016 | 3/1/2002 | WO | 00 | 4/5/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/078850 | 10/10/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1392401 | Chance et al. | Oct 1921 | A |
1559938 | Chance | Nov 1925 | A |
2590756 | Colin et al. | Mar 1952 | A |
2760633 | Davis | Aug 1956 | A |
4267980 | LaPoint | May 1981 | A |
5082553 | Tanii | Jan 1992 | A |
5495949 | Olivier | Mar 1996 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
968121 | May 1951 | DE |
1031234 | Jun 1958 | DE |
1053433 | Mar 1959 | DE |
1193892 | Jun 1965 | DE |
3327040 | Feb 1985 | DE |
804616 | Nov 1958 | GB |
1050259 | Dec 1966 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040164002 A1 | Aug 2004 | US |