Patent Application
20070062616
The invention relates to a method for the sinter coating of a workpiece and a device suitable for carrying out the method.
Methods for producing protective coatings on metal surfaces, especially wire goods and small metal parts, by sintering-on plastic powder have been known for a long time and are in use. For carrying out such methods, suitable plastic powders are supplied, for example, by DEGUSSA AG, Marl under the trade name VESTOSINT.
The sinter coating of a workpiece conventionally takes place by first heating the workpiece to a temperature above the fusion temperature of the material to be sintered-on and then bringing the workpiece in contact with the material, general in powder form. Contact takes place at ambient temperatures which must necessarily lie below the fusion temperature of the sinter material so that the workpiece loses heat during contact with the sinter material and finally falls below the fusion temperature of the sinter material whereby the sinter process comes to a standstill. The thickness of the layer deposited up till then on the workpiece is proportional to the time interval between the beginning of contact with the sinter material and the time at which the temperature falls below its fusion temperature. If the workpiece to be coated has a small material thickness, the cooling takes place more rapidly than in the case of a workpiece having a greater material thickness so that in order to achieve uniform layer thicknesses on workpieces having different material thicknesses, the temperatures to which the workpieces are heated before they are brought in contact with the sinter material must be different. In the case of simply shaped workpieces having a homogeneous material composition and uniform wall thickness, sinter coatings having a desired coating thickness can thus be achieved by a suitable choice of temperature at which workpieces are brought in contact with the sinter material.
In the case of workpiece having non-uniform wall thickness or inhomogeneous material composition, in general terms workpieces comprising sections having different surface-related heat capacity, this results in the problem that the sinter layers which are deposited on a section of higher surface-related heat capacity before this is cooled below the fusion temperature of the sinter material, are larger than those in a section having lower surface-related heat capacity. It is therefore difficult to provide such workpieces with a coating of uniform thickness. If a minimum layer thickness must be achieved on the sections having low surface-related heat capacity, it must be accepted that the resulting layer on other sections will be thicker. This not only results in undesirable increased costs because of the unnecessary consumption of sinter material but the different layer thicknesses also increase the probability of defects of the sinter layer which impair their protective effect for the workpiece located thereunder.
Shock heating methods have been proposed to solve this problem wherein the heating of the workpiece is interrupted before this has reached a homogeneous temperature distribution. This has the result that when brought in contact with the sinter material, sections of the workpiece having a low surface-related heat capacity have a higher temperature than those having a low [sic] surface-related heat capacity so that the time intervals before cooling below the fusion temperature and thus the resulting layer thicknesses for both sections become approximately the same. In principle it should be assumed that with such a method, by suitably selecting the heating conditions, i.e. the final temperature which would be established on a workpiece if it were continuously exposed to the shock heating conditions and the time interval in which the workpiece is exposed to the shock heating, temperature differences between sections of different heat capacity can be adjusted within certain upper limits and can be optimised to the same deposition layer thicknesses. However, it has been found in tests that no satisfactory layer qualities could be achieved in this way and that in particular in transition zones between sections having different surface-related heat capacities, there was a strong tendency towards layer defects.
It is thus the object of the invention to provide a method and a device which allow sinter layers of high quality and homogeneous thickness to be produced on workpieces having sections with different surface-related heat capacities.
It has surprisingly been found that this aim can be achieved if the conventional shock heating is preceded by a step of pre-heating the workpiece, wherein the pre-heating conditions are selected so that, with continuing effect on the workpiece, they bring this up to a temperature which lies between the fusion temperature of the coating material and that temperature which the workpiece would reach if it were continuously exposed to the shock heating conditions.
It is postulated that the efficiency of the method is based on the fact that the strong temperature gradient present in conventional shock heating between the surface and the interior of a section having a high surface-related heat capacity is reduced by the pre-heating step and that as a result, the importance of the internal temperature compensation inside the workpiece for the cooling of its surface is reduced. Whereas in simple shock heating without pre-heating, deep surface regions of the workpiece, especially at a boundary between sections of different surface-related heat capacity, absorb comparatively little heat because of their protected position and accordingly cool rapidly during coating, in the method according to the invention these areas retain a temperature suitable for sintering-on for longer as a result of the pre-heating so that a good-quality layer is also formed in these problem zones.
Both the pre-heating and also the shock heating preferably take place by inserting the workpiece into respectively one thermal bath, especially in the form of a furnace. In this case, the residence time of the workpiece in the second thermal bath, i.e., the pre-heating step is preferably longer than the residence in the first thermal bath, i.e. the shock heating. In a coating installation, these different residence times are preferably achieved by the extension of the pre-heating furnace along a conveying section for the workpieces to be coated being greater than that of the furnace for the shock heating.
If the workpiece cools slowly during the sintering, in a final phase a rough surface can form as a result of incomplete fusion of the sinter material. In order to improve the surface quality, after applying the sinter material it is appropriate to after-heat the workpiece at least superficially to the fusion temperature of the coating material in order to thus achieve a smoothing of the surface.
The sinter material is preferably applied to the workpiece by introducing the heated workpiece into the sinter material in the fluidised state.
A polyamide powder such as the VESTOSINT powder already mentioned is suitable as sinter material. This has a melting point of 176° C.; thus a temperature of the second thermal bath between 240 and 340° C. is suitable for pre-heating; a temperature of the first thermal bath between 390 and 420° C. is preferred for shock heating.
The shock heating is appropriately interrupted when the section having the higher surface-related heat capacity has reached an average temperature selected in a range between 300 and 370° C.
The specifically selected temperature depends on the ratio of the surface-related heat capacities; the more different these are, the lower the selected interruption temperature must be in order to ensure the same layer thickness on the different sections of the workpiece.
A preferred application of the method according to the invention is the coating of a heat exchanger, especially a condenser for a refrigerator where the section having high surface-related heat capacity is a pipe for a heat transfer fluid and the section having low surface-related heat capacity is a wire affixed to the pipe.
Further features and advantages of the method according to the invention are obtained from the following description of an exemplary embodiment with reference to the appended figures. In the figures:
The steel pipe 1 typically has an outside diameter of 8 mm and a wall thickness of 1 mm. The wires 2 are solid with a typical diameter of 1.6 mm. The wires 2 are fixed to the steel pipe 1 by spot welding, soldering or other suitable techniques wherein in the contact zone 3 between pipe 1 and wire 2, narrow barely accessible corners 4 are formed.
As can easily be seen, the quantity of material per unit surface area at the pipe 1 is significantly larger than at the wires 2 and specifically with the dimensions selected here a factor of about 2.5 larger. Accordingly, the heat capacity per unit surface area at the wires 2 is significantly lower than that at the pipe 1 so that the former are heated significantly more rapidly than the latter in a thermal bath.
The coating device shown highly schematically in
On their path through the coating device, the heat exchangers 6 initially pass through a pre-heating furnace 7 which is held by a pre-heating burner 8 at a fixed temperature between 200 and 340° C., in this case at 240° C. The length of the pre-heating furnace 7 is selected to that two groups of heat exchangers fit in or two conveying steps are required to convey one group through the pre-heating furnace 7.
Directly adjacent to the pre-heating furnace 7 is a shock heating furnace 9 which is held at a temperature specified between 390 and 420° C. by a further burner 10. The two furnaces 7, 9 can be delimited from one another by a lock 15 indicated by a dashed line in the figure; however, this is not absolutely necessary. The shock heating furnace 9 provides space for a group of heat exchangers 6; their residence time in the furnace 9 thus corresponds to the time interval between two conveying steps of the conveying device 5.
Provided adjacent to the shock heating furnace 9 is a fluidised bed 11 containing fluidised polyamide powder. The conveying device 5 has control elements (not shown) for lowering a group of heat exchangers 6 into the fluidised bed 11 and raising the group again. The fluidised bed 11 provides space for a group of heat exchangers 6 so that the maximum residence time of the heat exchanges therein corresponds to the time interval between two conveying steps of the conveying device 5. However, the actual residence time in the fluidised bed 11 can be arbitrarily shortened in contrast by raising the heat exchangers 6 from the fluidised bed 11 at a time which can be arbitrarily selected in principle between two conveying steps of the conveying device 5.
The heat exchangers 6 provided with a polyamide coating in the fluidised bed 11 finally reach an after-heating furnace 12 wherein they are again heated to a temperature above the fusion temperature of the polyamide powder. For this purpose the after-heating furnace 12 is held at a temperature of 240° C. by a burner 13. This after-heating furnace 12 is used to improve the quality of the polyamide layers deposited on the heat exchangers 6. These can have a certain roughness on leaving the fluidised bed 11 which can be attributed to the fact that towards the end of the deposition of the sinter material on the heat exchangers, their temperature can have dropped to such an extent that this is no longer sufficient for complete fusion of the sinter material grains. The after-heating furnace 12 provides space for two groups of heat exchangers 6 so that two steps of the conveying device 3 are required to convey the heat exchangers 6 through the after-heating furnace 12.
Provided adjacent to the after-heating furnace 12 is a dipping tank 14 wherein the ready-coated heat exchangers 6 are quenched.
At time t=60 s the heat exchanger 6 is brought into the shock heating furnace 9 where it is exposed to a temperature of 420° C. When at time t=90 s the heat exchanger is removed from the shock heating furnace 9 and transported further to the fluidised bed 11, the wires have reached a temperature of just above 40 0° C.; the surface temperature of the pipe is about 330° C. Between the surface of the pipe and its interior there is a temperature difference of 10 to 15° C. This means that surface areas of the pipe which are directly adjacent to a joining point 3 to a wire 2 and which are thus only comparatively less efficiently heated by contact with hot gas in the furnaces 5 and 7, have reached a temperature of the same order of magnitude. Thus, unlike in the conventional case of shock heating, they are not strongly cooled in a single step by heat removal into the interior of the pipe but substantially by the pipe delivering heat to the fluidised bed in which it is immersed. This cooling does not take place more rapidly at the contact points 3 between wire 2 and pipe 1 than at other areas of the pipe. Rather, at problematical points during coating such as the narrow gaps 4 in the contact area between wire and pipe the heat release to the fluidised bed is slower than at the exposed surface areas of the pipe as a result of the protected position of these points so that it can be expected that a temperature sufficient to melt the coating material will persist longer at these points than at other locations whereby the difficult access of the coating material to these points is compensated and a layer having uniform thickness and high quality is also obtained at these problem points.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 103 22 678.8 | May 2003 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP04/05442 | 5/19/2004 | WO | 6/30/2006 |
