Variable speed technology using permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs) for compressors is one of the emerging technologies to lead efficiency improvements in today's Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems. Different from induction motors, PMSMs need to know rotor position to be able to control the rotor. Since the motor is normally disposed inside the compressor without any speed sensor, rotor angle and speed estimation is needed to control the PMSM compressors. Most rotor angle and speed estimation techniques operate at relatively low efficiencies at low speeds due to noise and low currents, however, and the general approach in these cases is therefore to start the compressor in an open loop control scheme and then switch to a sensorless vector control scheme.
With this approach, the switch transition may at times cause high spike currents, oscillations and stability issues that tend to reduce the product's lifetime and may increase failure rates. Also, the PMSM compressor has to release its pressure difference, which means the compressor may not be able to immediately restart leading to energy stored in the compressor potentially being lost.
A method of conducting smooth motor startup is provided and includes operating a motor in an open loop control scheme at startup, operating the motor in a closed loop sensorless control scheme at a time after startup and transitioning between the open loop control scheme and the closed loop control scheme by reducing a difference between an estimated rotor angle of the motor and a commanded ramping angle of the motor.
A method of operating a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) compressor for smooth motor startup is provided and includes operating the PMSM in an open loop control scheme at startup, operating the PMSM in a closed loop sensorless control scheme at a time after startup and transitioning between the open loop control scheme and the closed loop control scheme by determining a difference between an estimated rotor angle and a commanded ramping angle and controlling the commanded ramping angle to reduce the difference.
A method of operating a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) compressor for smooth motor startup is provided and includes operating the PMSM in an open loop control scheme at startup with a predefined load condition, operating the PMSM in a closed loop sensorless control scheme at a time after startup and transitioning between the open loop control scheme and the closed loop control scheme by determining a difference between an estimated rotor angle and a commanded ramping angle and controlling the commanded ramping angle to reduce the difference to zero.
The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
A novel method to start a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) for compressor applications is proposed. Using the proposed method, an embodiment permits starting under loaded conditions. As such, the compressor does not need to release its pressure in an otherwise waste of energy. The proposed method provides a smooth transition between an open loop control scheme as illustrated in
With reference to
Current information (i.e., Phase A current and Phase B current) is used as the control signal and employed in a feedback loop 60 by way of, e.g., Clarke and Park transformations 601, 602 to generate the torque and flux current feedback. This torque and flux current feedback is then provided to the first and second current regulators 10 and 20, respectively. As described herein, the Park transformation and the Inverse Park transformation each rely upon an input of a ramping angle, θramping, which is derived from a speed reference desired for the operation of the PMSM 50, as shown in
With reference to
There is frequently if not always an angle difference, Δθ, between the ramping angle, θramping, of the open loop control scheme of
In operation 3, the angle difference between the estimated (or actual) rotor angle, θestimation, and the ramping angle, θramping, is calculated as Δθ during and after ramping is completed. Ramping completion is determined on a case by case basis and is application specific in that ramping can be completed slowly or quickly in accordance with a desired load condition. After the ramping target is reached, in operation 4, the ramping angle, θramping, is replaced using the estimated angle plus the angle difference, θestimation+Δθ, for the Park and Inverse Park transformations and the output of the speed regulator 70 is made the reference signal to the first current regulator 10.
At this point, in operation 5, the angle difference, AO, is gradually reduced to zero until the two angles, θestimation and θtransition, are substantially equal to one another. The transition between the open loop control scheme of
In accordance with embodiments, operations 4 and 5 of
While the invention has been described in detail in connection with only a limited number of embodiments, it should be readily understood that the invention is not limited to such disclosed embodiments. Rather, the invention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, while various embodiments of the invention have been described, it is to be understood that aspects of the invention may include only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description, but is only limited by the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a National Stage Application of PCT/US2012/048284 filed Jul. 26, 2012, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/512,224 filed Jul. 27, 2011, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/048284 | 7/26/2012 | WO | 00 | 1/24/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/016505 | 1/31/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3601678 | Abraham et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
4455513 | Fulton et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4538422 | Mount et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4549404 | Lord | Oct 1985 | A |
4642543 | MacMinn | Feb 1987 | A |
4673849 | Sears et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4743815 | Gee et al. | May 1988 | A |
4912378 | Vukosavic | Mar 1990 | A |
5223772 | Carobolante | Jun 1993 | A |
6894450 | Cheng et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7066034 | Ying Yin Ho | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7221152 | Piippo | May 2007 | B2 |
7638959 | Rozman et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7679307 | Mills, Jr. et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8264192 | Green et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8547051 | Green et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20030214266 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040249596 | Ho | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050052177 | Piippo | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050264366 | Zivanovic et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20080278101 | Shahi et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090153083 | Rozman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100083692 | Todd et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100083693 | Todd et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095691 | Kondou et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100236264 | Lifson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110016893 | Dawes | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110030398 | Marcinkiewicz et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110030419 | Kikuchi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110031914 | Green et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120306414 | Green et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued in PCT/US2012/048284 on Jun. 14, 2013, 3 pages. |
Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2012/048284 mailed Jun. 14, 2013, 6 pages. |
Gao et al., A Novel Drive Strategy ffor PMSM Compressor, Electrical and Control Engineering (ICECE), 2010 International Conference, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, Jun. 25, 2010, pp. 3192-3195. |
Balazovic et al., Sensorless PMSM Control for H-Axis Washing Machine Drive; Powere Electronics Specialists Conference 2008, PESC 2008, IEEE Piscataway, NJ, Jun. 15, 2008, pp. 4237-4242. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140152212 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61512224 | Jul 2011 | US |