1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a system and method of accounting and reporting network traffic information on mobile nodes within an ad-hoc network. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for implementing continuous accounting of network traffic information on individual mobile nodes and providing a sparse matrix method for compaction of collected data for periodic transmission to the core network when accessible.
2. Description of the Related Art
In recent years, a type of mobile communications network known as an “ad-hoc” network has been developed to address the needs of multiple mobile device communication beyond traditional infrastructure coverage. In this type of network, each user terminal (hereinafter “mobile node”) is capable of operating as a base station or router for other mobile nodes within the network, thus eliminating the need for a fixed infrastructure of base stations. Accordingly, data packets being sent from a source mobile node to a destination mobile node are typically routed through a number of intermediate mobile nodes before reaching the destination node.
More sophisticated ad-hoc networks are also being developed which, in addition to enabling mobile nodes to communicate with each other as in conventional ad-hoc networks, further enable the mobile nodes to access fixed networks and communicate with other types of user terminals, such as those on the public switched telephone network (PSTN) and the Internet. Details of these advanced types of ad-hoc networks are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,072,650 entitled “Ad Hoc Peer-to-Peer Mobile Radio Access System Interfaced to the PSTN and Cellular Networks”, issued on Jul. 4, 2006, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,807,165 entitled “Time Division Protocol for an Ad-Hoc, Peer-to-Peer Radio Network Having Coordinating Channel Access to Shared Parallel Data Channels with Separate Reservation Channel”, issued on Oct. 19, 2004, and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,873,839 entitled “Prioritized-Routing for an Ad-Hoc, Peer-to-Peer, Mobile Radio Access System”, issued on Mar. 29, 2005, the entire content of each being incorporated herein by reference.
Generally, all nodes in a wireless ad-hoc peer-to-peer network provide similar services and functionality. Therefore, peer-to-peer networks distinguish themselves from traditional infrastructure networks, where one or more nodes offer a superset of the functionality of the rest of the network. In traditional networks, nodes seek out infrastructure nodes to provide services individual nodes are unable to perform. These infrastructure nodes are normally discovered by broadcast traffic advertisements from their client nodes in a network. Infrastructure nodes in traditional networks typically perform. Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP), Address Resolution Protocol (ARP), as well as other services that depend on broadcast traffic. Services such as Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol, defined by IETF RFC 2131 and 2132, the entire content of each being incorporated herein by reference, are used by a node to automatically obtain network settings from a central server, including the node's IP address, the address of Domain Name Servers (DNS), the IP address of default gateways, and many other network settings. Additional services, such as Address Resolution Protocol, defined by STD 0037 and RFC 0826, the entire content of each being incorporated herein by reference, are used by network nodes to map IP addresses to MAC addresses so that IP traffic can be delivered to specific hardware.
Peer-to-peer networks typically do not contain specialized infrastructure nodes. Therefore, as a result of the limited infrastructure dependence in an ad-hoc network, each wireless node is tasked with greater individual functions. However, the execution of wider functions at an individual node requires several advancements at the node level. For instance, in a resource-limited mobile ad-hoc network where there are no specialized infrastructure nodes for managing task activity accounting, there may be insufficient means to collect usage data from the mobile nodes in the network. Such data may include the number of data packets sent, packets received or packets routed by a mobile node. This information may be used in network capacity determinations, as well as usage billing reports for individual nodes. As this information is generated by mobile nodes, but processed at core network elements, collecting and transmitting such data in a wireless ad-hoc network requires that the mobility of the nodes be taken into account.
Attempts to direct individual mobile nodes to collect and provide usage information face difficulties resulting from the fact that mobile devices in the ad-hoc network may spend considerable time beyond the communication range of the core network elements where accounting processing functions are performed in typical systems. The intermittent nature of ad-hoc connections resulting from mobile devices creates a need for a method and system to perform accounting of network traffic on individual subscriber nodes during all periods, including periods when the nodes are beyond the range of the core network and the traditional accounting services provided. However, collection and maintenance of usage data at the subscriber node must use minimal overhead resources so as not to burden the network, or the node, with the accounting task.
Accordingly, a need exists for a system and method for continuous accounting on individual mobile nodes, using a method for compaction of the accounting data when forwarding the collected information to the core network, such that impact on overhead resources is minimal.
An object of the present invention is to provide a system and method for performing sparse table accounting and dissemination from a mobile node in a wireless ad-hoc network.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a system and method for collecting and storing node usage information at an individual mobile node in a wireless ad-hoc network.
Still another object of the present invention is to prepare a summary report of collected data for transmission to a core network during periods when the core network is accessible, and maintain data collection during periods when the core network is inaccessible for later transmission.
These and other objects are substantially achieved by providing a system and method for implementing continuous accounting of network traffic on a mobile node within a wireless ad-hoc network, and using a sparse matrix method for compaction of the accounting data when forwarding to core network elements when within communication range. The embodiment of the present invention works for situations when the node has initially been in contact with the core network before periods of connection loss, and when the node has initially come up dark, with no connection to the core network, and then periodically establishes connection with the core network.
These and other objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will be more readily appreciated from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The network 100 may also include a plurality of fixed routers 107-1 through 107-n (referred to generally as nodes 107 or fixed routers 107) for routing data packets between other nodes 102, 106 or 107. It is noted that for purposes of this discussion, the nodes discussed above can be collectively referred to as “nodes 102, 106 and 107”, or simply “nodes”.
As can be appreciated by one skilled in the art, the nodes 102, 106 and 107 are capable of communicating with each other directly, or via one or more other nodes 102, 106 or 107 operating as a router or routers for packets being sent between nodes, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,943,322 to Mayor, which is incorporated herein by reference, and in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/897,790, 09/815,157 and 09/815,164, referenced above.
As shown in
Each node 102, 106 and 107 further includes a memory 114, such as a random access memory (RAM), that is capable of storing, among other things, routing information pertaining to itself and other nodes in the network 100. The nodes 102, 106 and 107 exchange their respective routing information, referred to as routing advertisements or routing table information, with each other via a broadcasting mechanism periodically, for example, when a new node enters the network 100, or when existing nodes in the network 100 move.
As further shown in
In
In
In
In
However, whenever a node 102 loses communication with the core network 104 for any reason, the transceiver of the node 102 disables sending accounting data to the aggregation point, as the data would be lost. During periods where the node 102 is unable to communicate usage data to the core network 104, the node continues collecting usage data, maintained in data registers, until a connection to the core network is re-established. Within each node 102 the accounting software package directs a counting mechanism to continuously count operations executed by the node. Total counts are stored individually in a data register in persistent or non-persistent data storage. Although either storage method may be used, or a combination of both methods, one advantage to the use of persistent storage is that accounting data is generated when the total time the transceiver is in use, from power up to power-off, is less than the accounting reporting cycle. Once the connection to the core network 104 is re-established by the node 102, the accounting data of the data register is prepared and sent as a summary report, containing count totals since the last reporting occurred.
Data at each node 102 in
For example, an accounting cycle of approximately 3 minutes would not overflow a 32-bit counter even at maximum data rates in typical wireless Wide Area Network (WAN) systems. Additionally, the loss of a single 3-minute report is statistically insignificant over a month's billing cycle. Furthermore, the 3-minute cycle would typically be much shorter than most mobile node users' online habits.
If a mobile node user were to attempt to take advantage of this cycle to minimize monthly statistics by limiting all connections to less than the accounting cycle, mechanisms could be included in the system to look for this behavior and provide a means to direct the individual node to implement a shorter accounting cycle. Using system monitoring in the core network and random accounting audits in the nodes, system abusers and fraud can easily be detected.
As stated earlier, the accounting software at nodes 102 directs the counting of specific occurrences at the individual node. Each node 102 counts usage traffic in terms of
Counter values at each node 102 are accumulated and stored in a data register configured as an Accounting Metrics Table (AMT) in this example as shown in
In the AMT 144 of
The current counter value column 134 in
In
Although the transmission of AMT data from each node 102 to the aggregation point 120 occurs at specific intervals, interruptions in transmissions occur when node 102 is beyond communication range of the core network 104. During periods when the core network is inaccessible, node 102 continues data collection, and updates to the AMT 144, but summary report preparation and transmission is stopped until, at some subsequent specific interval, the core network 104 becomes accessible to node 102 once again. Specifically, accounting data is collected at node 102 for the duration of an accounting cycle and maintained as cumulative totals between summary report transmissions. If the core network 104 remains inaccessible for multiple accounting cycles, cumulative totals of each cycle are maintained from the time of the last summary report transmission until the subsequent summary report transmission. Once the core network 104 becomes accessible again, the node 102 will again evaluate the AMT table to determine which counter values are to included in a summary report for transmission to the core network 104, and a summary report is prepared and sent to the core network 104 for processing.
In the embodiment of the present invention described above, each current counter value 134 of the AMT 144 in
The embodiment of the present invention described above further conserves bandwidth on transmission of data to the aggregation point 120 from the node 102 by compressing out null counters, or statistically insignificant counters, in the AMT. The data is sent at Layer 2, using a link-layer transport mechanism as a security enhancement. By keeping the transport mechanism at Layer 2, the node 102 can dump the accounting data to the core network 104 without having to negotiate a Layer 3 connection (i.e. IP address assignment). Sending data at Layer 2 is achieved by piggy-backing data on an existing message transmission, which also conserves bandwidth and minimizes the impact on system capacity. The data transmission can not be corrupted or spoofed using IP protocols, and node 102 may further use encoding, such as Basic Encoding Rules (BER), to encode the counter length, thereby alleviating the need for a′ priori knowledge of lengths by downstream processing elements.
A further embodiment of the present invention may also include a mechanism to alter the accounting reporting cycle depending upon variations at the individual node. For example, if the normal duty cycle for reporting is 3 minutes and the node is currently inactive, or has very slow counter advancement indicating low usage, or uptime is significantly long, the node may begin to lengthen the accounting reporting cycle. Adjustments to the accounting reporting cycle may be implemented by either changing the duty cycle or skipping duty cycles. Such a duty cycle modification would save significant bandwidth and be useful as long as the statistical probability that the node user will remain online and the impact of losing the longer accounting data is acceptable.
Although only a few exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4494192 | Lew et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4617656 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4736371 | Tejima et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4742357 | Rackley | May 1988 | A |
4747130 | Ho | May 1988 | A |
4910521 | Mellon | Mar 1990 | A |
5034961 | Adams | Jul 1991 | A |
5068916 | Harrison et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5231634 | Giles et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5233604 | Ahmadi et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241542 | Natarajan et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5317566 | Joshi | May 1994 | A |
5392450 | Nossen | Feb 1995 | A |
5412654 | Perkins | May 1995 | A |
5424747 | Chazelas | Jun 1995 | A |
5502722 | Fulghum | Mar 1996 | A |
5517491 | Nanni et al. | May 1996 | A |
5555425 | Zeller et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5555540 | Radke | Sep 1996 | A |
5572528 | Shuen | Nov 1996 | A |
5615212 | Ruszczyk et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5618045 | Kagan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5621732 | Osawa | Apr 1997 | A |
5623495 | Eng et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627976 | McFarland et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631897 | Pacheco et al. | May 1997 | A |
5644576 | Bauchot et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652751 | Sharony | Jul 1997 | A |
5680392 | Semaan | Oct 1997 | A |
5684794 | Lopez et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5687194 | Paneth et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696903 | Mahany | Dec 1997 | A |
5701294 | Ward et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706428 | Boer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5717689 | Ayanoglu | Feb 1998 | A |
5745483 | Nakagawa et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5774876 | Wooley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781540 | Malcolm et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787080 | Hulyalkar et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794154 | Bar-On et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796732 | Mazzola et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796741 | Saito et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805593 | Busche | Sep 1998 | A |
5805842 | Nagaraj et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805977 | Hill et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809518 | Lee | Sep 1998 | A |
5822309 | Ayanoglu et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5844905 | McKay et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5845097 | Kang et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857084 | Klein | Jan 1999 | A |
5870350 | Bertin et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877724 | Davis | Mar 1999 | A |
5881095 | Cadd | Mar 1999 | A |
5881372 | Kruys | Mar 1999 | A |
5886992 | Raatikainen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896561 | Schrader et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903559 | Acharya et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909651 | Chander et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5943322 | Mayor et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5987011 | Toh | Nov 1999 | A |
5987033 | Boer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991279 | Haugli et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6028853 | Haartsen | Feb 2000 | A |
6029217 | Arimilli et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034542 | Ridgeway | Mar 2000 | A |
6044062 | Brownrigg et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047330 | Stracke, Jr. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052594 | Chuang et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052752 | Kwon | Apr 2000 | A |
6064626 | Stevens | May 2000 | A |
6067291 | Kamerman et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073005 | Raith et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078566 | Kikinis | Jun 2000 | A |
6104712 | Robert et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108738 | Chambers et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115580 | Chuprun et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122690 | Nannetti et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130881 | Stiller et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132306 | Trompower | Oct 2000 | A |
6147975 | Bowman-Amuah | Nov 2000 | A |
6163699 | Naor et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6178337 | Spartz et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192053 | Angelico et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192230 | Van Bokhorst et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208870 | Lorello et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223240 | Odenwald et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240294 | Hamilton et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246875 | Seazholtz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249516 | Brownrigg et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6275707 | Reed et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285892 | Hulyalkar | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304556 | Haas | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327300 | Souissi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6349091 | Li | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349210 | Li | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6574465 | Marsh et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6853630 | Manning | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6904017 | Meempat et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
20010053699 | McCrady et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030087645 | Kim et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2132180 | Mar 1996 | CA |
0513841 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0627827 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0924890 | Jun 1999 | EP |
2683326 | Jul 1993 | FR |
WO 9608884 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9724005 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9839936 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9912302 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 0034932 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0110154 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0133770 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0135567 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0137481 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0137482 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0137483 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0235253 | May 2002 | WO |