The present invention concerns strengthening of structures and more specifically strengthening of structures according, to the additional prestressing method.
Additional prestressing is a known method for strengthening or repairing concrete or masonry structures and has formed the subject of standard NF P95-104 (“Repair and strengthening of concrete and masonry structures”, published in December 1992 by the French standards association (AFNOR)).
It involves generating prestressing forces by putting reinforcing members into tension, for example prestressing cables, external to the structure to be strengthened. The reinforcing members transmit forces to the structure through anchorages bearing on spirally reinforced concrete or metal parts, called bosses, offset from structural components such as existing bracings, beams or walls.
As specified in section 5.2 of standard NF P 95-104, these anchorages are generally fixed by pinning using prestressing bars.
Concrete bosses are voluminous units, which can either be cast in place or precast. However, boss installation proves delicate in either case, especially because of the difficulty in accessing structural components on which bosses must bear. Openings or windows must sometimes be created in the structure to allow bosses to be installed.
Metal bosses are shop-fabricated for adaptation to each structure, which ensures their superior fabrication quality compared with concrete bosses. To allow such bosses to have a surface with a sufficiently high friction coefficient bearing on a concrete structural component, this bearing surface must be serrated by machining it or by welding steel wires to it, leading to high construction cost.
According to the method recommended by standard NF P 95-104, reinforcing members pass through the bosses in which they are anchored. Such an anchorage is always made inside the boss on the side opposite to the reinforcing member regular section. It thereby compresses the boss when the reinforcing members are tensioned.
Moreover, bosses foreseen by the standard are positioned at the ends of the structure to be strengthened, such that the additional prestress is applied over the longest possible distance. They are therefore often placed near to obstructions, such as structural walls, columns or bracings. This arrangement makes it difficult to place the reinforcing-member tensioning jack.
For this reason, it is generally necessary to displace the boss away from the obstruction to ensure enough clearance to position the jack, which effectively limits prestressing to only a subsidiary part of the structure. Alternatively, the boss may be placed near the obstruction on condition, however, that an opening is made in this obstruction to allow the jack to be positioned. Applying the resulting prestress is better than in the former case, but this solution requires concrete break-out or drilling work to be performed.
One object of the present invention is to overcome the drawbacks of the current methods recalled above by allowing prestress to be applied to a major section of the structural component to be strengthened, whilst avoiding implementation of work involving breaking out part of the structure for strengthening purposes.
Another object of the invention is to have an anchorage well suited to the structure to be strengthened, without requiring additional adaptation operations such as machining of an anchorage block surface bearing on a member of the structure to be strengthened.
The invention therefore proposes an anchorage unit for anchoring at least one prestressing member, capable of being tensioned, onto a structural component to be strengthened or repaired by additional prestressing, including means of fixing onto the said structural component and means of anchoring the prestressing member located adjacent to a first side of the anchorage unit oriented towards a regular section of the prestressing member. According to the invention, the fixing means are located adjacent to a second side, opposite the first side, of the anchorage unit, which is so provided that it may be put into traction when the prestressing member is tensioned.
When part of the structure, whose ends are not easily accessible, must be strengthened by additional prestressing, this anchorage unit enables the required compressive stress to be applied to the whole of the considered area. Because the anchorage unit works essentially in tension between the anchoring means adjacent to the first side and the fixing means adjacent to the opposing, second side, compressive stress is applied to the structure right up to the fixing means, in other words almost as far as the second side of the anchorage unit. This second side may be located near to an obstruction that would hamper implementation of conventional anchorages.
Moreover, the invention proposes a method for strengthening or repairing a structure by additional prestressing comprising implementation of such an anchorage unit. This method includes the following steps:
Reinforcing members used for prestressing are conventionally metallic. In particular, they may feature strands 5 capable of being tensioned and forming a cable in their regular section, in other words between anchorage zones. Strands are generally protected from corrosion in their regular section, for example by a high-density polyethylene (HDPE) sheath 4 enclosing the strands and injected with cement grout or a non-adhesive soft material such as grease or wax.
The anchorage unit 6 is integral and compact. It is favourably made of cast iron. At one of its ends (on the right in
Furthermore, in an advantageous embodiment, the cast iron anchorage unit 6 may be cast to feature orifices that permit sealing of prestressing cable sheath 4 connections with the anchorage unit 6. A connection collar 9 and seals may then be inserted into these anchorage unit 6 entry orifices to ensure such a seal.
Moreover, the anchorage unit 6 has means of fixing onto the structural component to be strengthened or repaired, which may be an industrial building floor, for example.
According to the invention, the anchorage unit 6 section opposite the strand 5 anchorage, in other words the anchorage unit 6 section furthest away from the prestressing cable regular section, is fabricated such that it may be fixed onto the structural component to be strengthened. In
As represented in
The combination so formed therefore allows the resultant of the pinning and tensioning forces to be transmitted to the structure to be strengthened.
In an advantageous embodiment, the anchorage unit fixed to the concrete floor slab 12 has a bearing surface featuring cast serrations in contact with the structural component. Such casting of the iron enables effective bonding of the anchorage unit 6 with the concrete to be obtained without having to perform expensive additional operations, for example machining of the anchorage unit 6.
The arrangement foreseen by the invention is particularly advantageous because it allows the strand to be tensioned without having to displace the anchorage away from the wall or obstruction 13, which backs onto the anchorage unit 6. The end of the strand is effectively accessible at the housing 8 of the anchorage unit 6. The housing 8 is located at the distance from the anchorage unit fixing zone (illustrated by the orifices 7). A tensioning jack fitted with a curved tip can easily be installed in the available space beneath the anchorage unit 6. Resorting to breaking out or drilling the wall 13 to tension the strand 5 may therefore be avoided, unlike the common practice with conventional bosses.
Moreover, such an arrangement permits sufficient excess length of cable for retensioning or, on the contrary, relaxing the strand 5 after initial tensioning and trimming of the strand 5.
A protective cap or sleeve 11 can be advantageously installed to protect the end of the strand 5 after it leaves the housing 8, as illustrated in
When prestressing forces to be applied are very high, the prestressing bars “pinning” the anchorage units onto the structure may not be enough to anchor all the cable force exerted on the structure by friction because the friction coefficient of serrated cast iron on concrete (of the order of 0.6) requires a very high pinning force. In this case, it may be advantageous to transfer all forces between the anchorage unit and the structure by combining friction and direct bearing. Direct bearing is obtained, for example, by means of a recess 17 provided in the form of a blind hole in the anchorage unit face intended to be applied against the structure (
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
03 09225 | Jul 2003 | FR | national |
This is a continuation application of Ser. No. 10/901,321 filed Jul. 28, 2004 entitled “Method for Strengthening a Structure and Associated Anchorage Unit” which claims benefit to application No. FR 03 09225 filed Jul. 28, 2003 for which priority is claimed and which applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
742332 | Kunny et al. | Oct 1903 | A |
1107889 | Burns | Aug 1914 | A |
1686424 | Thomson et al. | Oct 1928 | A |
1746879 | Varney | Feb 1930 | A |
1909332 | Blackburn | May 1933 | A |
1958747 | Fiege | May 1934 | A |
2057881 | Creamer | Oct 1936 | A |
2163677 | Goeller | Jun 1939 | A |
2205348 | Del Camp | Jun 1940 | A |
2270240 | Freyssinet | Jan 1942 | A |
2294398 | Ferguson | Sep 1942 | A |
2211615 | Brickman et al. | Aug 1943 | A |
2328033 | Schorer | Aug 1943 | A |
2371882 | Freyssinet | Mar 1945 | A |
2449276 | Chalos | Sep 1948 | A |
2533064 | Streader | Dec 1950 | A |
2614801 | Mazzei | Oct 1952 | A |
2668280 | Dupre | Feb 1954 | A |
3205300 | Becker | Sep 1965 | A |
3255558 | Middendorf | Jun 1966 | A |
3293811 | Rice | Dec 1966 | A |
3399434 | Kelly | Sep 1968 | A |
3462543 | Wahl et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
3524228 | Kelly | Aug 1970 | A |
3551959 | Mastalski | Jan 1971 | A |
3606231 | Kilborn | Sep 1971 | A |
3685934 | Huber et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3703748 | Kelly | Nov 1972 | A |
3705376 | Kinkaid et al. | Dec 1972 | A |
3757390 | Edwards | Sep 1973 | A |
3762027 | Burtelson | Oct 1973 | A |
3795949 | Shorter | Mar 1974 | A |
3801067 | Shorter | Apr 1974 | A |
3877113 | Reyes | Apr 1975 | A |
3895879 | Burtelson | Jul 1975 | A |
3937607 | Rodormer | Feb 1976 | A |
3973297 | Bruinette | Aug 1976 | A |
4053974 | Howlett et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4203267 | Langhorst | May 1980 | A |
4304078 | Meriwether, Jr. | Dec 1981 | A |
4330970 | Bonink | May 1982 | A |
4337923 | Smith | Jul 1982 | A |
4349300 | Kelley | Sep 1982 | A |
4363462 | Wlodkowski et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4395161 | Wilson et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4460420 | Estrada | Jul 1984 | A |
4510723 | Soum | Apr 1985 | A |
4616458 | Davis et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4630974 | Sherman | Dec 1986 | A |
4678360 | Miller | Jul 1987 | A |
4680906 | Prevedini | Jul 1987 | A |
4700828 | Lane, Jr. | Oct 1987 | A |
4724639 | Moser | Feb 1988 | A |
4812096 | Peterson | Mar 1989 | A |
4821474 | Rodriguez | Apr 1989 | A |
4835822 | Savall et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4960348 | Seegmiller | Oct 1990 | A |
5024032 | Rodriguez | Jun 1991 | A |
5058469 | Rodriguez | Oct 1991 | A |
5079879 | Rodriguez | Jan 1992 | A |
5168681 | Ayrapetyan | Dec 1992 | A |
5231752 | Hereford | Aug 1993 | A |
5271199 | Northern | Dec 1993 | A |
5342568 | Yokota | Aug 1994 | A |
5440842 | Sorkin | Aug 1995 | A |
5466095 | Scott | Nov 1995 | A |
5535561 | Schuyler | Jul 1996 | A |
5544982 | Seegmiller | Aug 1996 | A |
5594977 | McCallion | Jan 1997 | A |
5671572 | Siller-Franco | Sep 1997 | A |
5718090 | Wei-Hwang | Feb 1998 | A |
5755535 | Fox | May 1998 | A |
5802788 | Ozawa et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5839235 | Sorkin | Nov 1998 | A |
5897102 | Sorkin | Apr 1999 | A |
5939003 | Crigler et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6145268 | Korzen | Nov 2000 | A |
6195949 | Schuyler | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230448 | Oliver et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234709 | Sorkin | May 2001 | B1 |
6318038 | Park | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6354596 | Rodriguez | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6393781 | Sorkin | May 2002 | B1 |
6625945 | Commins | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6748708 | Fuzier et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6817148 | Sorkin | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7174685 | Hayes | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7261494 | Stankus et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7717650 | Reschke et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
20010002529 | Commins et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20030009962 | Hughes | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20050115188 | Wallstein et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20070264090 | Reschke et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
846346 | Aug 1960 | GB |
9957390 | Nov 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120011788 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10901321 | Jul 2004 | US |
Child | 13243625 | US |