Attorney, Agent or Firm: Submitted by the Inventors
Background. Typically a loss payable provision in an insurance policy specifies that the insurance will authorized payment in the event of loss to a person or entity other than the named insured with an insurable interest in the covered property or, in some cases, jointly to the insured and the other person or entity. Under a typical loss payable clause, the insurer is under no obligation to make payment to the loss payee if payment for a loss can be denied to the insured. If the insurer makes any payments to the loss payee, the insurer obtains the loss payee's (subrogation) rights against any other party. Loss payable clauses are common in commercial auto and personal auto policies in which one or more vehicles are financed through a financial services company.
The coverage afforded to the loss payee under the aforementioned typical provision is “as its interest may appear.” in other words, it will only pay the financial institution's actual loss sustained, even if the value of the vehicle, or asset is greater. Loss payable clauses are also commonly used in commercial property insurance policies to protect the interest of an entity that has extended credit or leased personal property to the insured and typically included in the insurance policy as “additionally insured”.
Lender as a creditor who has loaned money in connection with the insured's property or project, with the same rights and duties that a mortgage clause gives a mortgagee, for example, Section (9) of the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Uniform Instrument for single-family residential mortgage loans in Ohio provides:
“Protection of Lender's Interest in the Property and Rights Under this Security Instrument. If (a) Borrower fails to perform the covenants and agreements contained in this Security instrument, (b) there is a legal proceeding that might significantly affect Lender's interest in the Property and/or rights under this Security Instrument (such as a proceeding in bankruptcy, probate, for condemnation or forfeiture, for enforcement of a lien which may attain priority over this Security instrument or to enforce laws or regulations), or (c) Borrower has abandoned the Property, then Lender may do and pay for whatever is reasonable or appropriate to protect Lender's interest in the Property and rights under this Security Instrument, including protecting and/or assessing the value of the Property, and securing and/or repairing the Property Securing the Property includes, but is not limited to, entering the Property to make repairs, change locks, replace or hoard up doors and windows, drain water from pipes, eliminate building or other code violations or dangerous conditions, and have utilities turned on or off. Although Lender may take action under this Section 9, Lender does not have to do so and is not under any duty or obligation to do so. It is agreed that Lender incurs no liability for not taking any or all actions authorized under this Section 9. (emphasis added)
Description. The business method patent disclosed herein describes a procedure whereby the Lender can also be the insurer, and can thus be enabled by the coverage defined within the policy and appendixes to invoke the Insurer's provision to ensure payment “as its interest may appear” to cover losses by the Lender as a creditor who has loaned money in connection with the insured's property or project, with the same rights and duties that a mortgage clause as described herein, gives to a mortgagee with a proviso of including an addendum of obtaining and maintaining reinsurance to protect the interests of the lender/primary insurance company. The policy will provide coverage for use of contractual obligations such as indemnity and exculpatory agreements, convertible debenture, waivers of recovery rights, insurance premiums, and insurance requirements to pass along to others what would otherwise be at the lender's one's own risks of loss.
In property insurance, additional insured status is most often used in conjunction with a premises lease agreement between the named insured as the lessee and the owner of the leased building, in which the insured tenant is required to purchase insurance on the leased building and name the building owner as an additional insured on the insurance policy with respect to the leased building. It is also typically a requirement for a General Contractor when enlisting the services of a sub-contractor for any type of municipal or construction project.
The method disclosed herein is a novel form of financing of a project because it provides an all risk insurance policy that also covers the interests of an insurance company/lender, including insurance coverage that is similar to that of an ‘additionally insured’ individual or organization however, this proviso for insuring the financial risks of an insurer/lender, did not formerly include certain parties, such as the primary insurance company/lender. This provision by contract and in the appendixes, usually Appendix A, as part of the policy wherein the language within the policy shall also include indemnification of the Lender under the indemnitor's commercial general liability policy, having the rights of an insured under its indemnitor's commercial general liability (CGL) policy as a way of backing up the promise of indemnification. If the indemnity agreement proves unenforceable for some reason, the indemnitee may still be able to obtain coverage for its liability by making a claim directly as an additional insured under the indemnitor's CGL policy.
FIG. 1 describes a flow chart of the method described herein including Identity of Risks, Risk Analysis, Avoidance, Mitigation, Risk Mitigation, Transfer of Risk including Contractual Obligations and Insurance, Acceptance, Risk Financing, and Total Cost of Risk.
Filed USA: Mar. 11, 2016
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2017/021576 | 9/3/2017 | WO | 00 |