All-wheel drive capable vehicles have many advantages over vehicles having a driveline connected to only a single axle. Specifically, all-wheel drive capable vehicles have increased traction and enhanced drivability over similar vehicles that are driven using only a single axle.
However, traditional all-wheel drive vehicles are disadvantaged by requiring continuous rotation of a second drive axle, and other portions of the driveline, at road speed, even when the all-wheel drive functionality is not beneficial. Consequently, traditional all-wheel drive vehicles tend to have reduced fuel, and overall, efficiency when compared to vehicles having only a single drive axle.
All-wheel drive vehicles are increasingly equipped with a secondary driveline disconnect feature. In such vehicles, when a control system detects that all-wheel drive functionality is not required, the control system disconnects the second drive axle (and other associated driveline components) to place the driveline into a single axle drive mode. Once the second drive axle is disconnected, there is no transfer of torque to the second drive axle. As a result, speed-dependent losses associated with the second drive axle (and other associated driveline components) are eliminated by allowing the second drive axle (and other associated driveline components) to remain in an idle condition. A secondary driveline disconnect feature may also allow a control of the torque delivered by the secondary axle. The former aids in decreasing the vehicle's fuel consumption, and the latter provides a very flexible torque control.
Typically, as part of a AWD system connect event, a secondary driveline disconnect propeller shaft rotational speed measurement is performed by measuring the time between the passing of two teeth of a rotating part such as a gear or tone wheel. In the known method, the rotational distance between two teeth of the rotating part is accurately known. The known method includes measuring two subsequent rising edges or two subsequent falling edges of teeth on the rotating part. Dividing the known position increment by the time provides an estimate of the propeller shaft rotational speed. Alternatively, a pulse counter can be used to account for the number of pulses in a given sampling period.
However, this method results in delayed and inaccurate measurements, especially at low propeller shaft rotational speeds, i.e., a low pulse count. The challenge remains to have an all-wheel drive vehicle which transitions from the disconnected (two-wheel drive) state to the connected (four-wheel drive) state in such a way that the vehicle operator does not feel the transition from two-wheel drive to four-wheel drive.
The disclosure herein describes a method and system for actuating a clutch utilizing an adaptable model and a high resolution measurement of the rotational speed of a propeller shaft.
The accompanying drawings, incorporated herein as part of the specification, illustrate the presently disclosed subject matter, and with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosed subject matter and to enable a person skilled in the pertinent art to make and use the disclosed subject matter.
It is to be understood that the presently disclosed subject matter may assume various alternative orientations and step sequences, except where expressly specified to the contrary. It is also to be understood that the specific devices, assemblies, systems and processes illustrated in the attached drawings, and described in the following specification are simply exemplary embodiments of the inventive concepts defined herein. Hence, specific dimensions, directions or other physical characteristics relating to the embodiments disclosed are not to be considered as limiting, unless expressly stated otherwise. Also, although they may not be, like elements in various embodiments described herein may be commonly referred to with like reference numerals within this section of the application.
In another embodiment, illustrated in
The subject matter disclosed herein is further described in relation to the vehicle layout depicted in
The second phase 302 includes a propeller shaft 120 low rotational speed phase, indicated in
The third phase 303 is a propeller shaft 120 controlled rotational speed phase, indicated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The on-line model adaptation 310 next includes a step 318 which comprises high resolution measuring of the propeller shaft 120 rotational speed. The method of high resolution measurement 318 may be utilized to provide more frequent updates to high-level controls 314—that determine actuation of a clutch in the secondary driveline disconnect system—during the third phase 303. As illustrated in
The frequency 330 between two sensor pulses, the risen and fallen (on and off) states, measures the average propeller shaft 120 rotational speed between the two sensor pulses. However, as illustrated in
To account for the propeller shaft 120 acceleration during data acquisition and processing, the method 318 of measuring the propeller shaft 120 rotational speed includes utilizing a routine 332 to estimate the propeller shaft 120 position increment obtained during a risen and fallen state. The routine 332 includes a step 334 comprising determining the rotational speed of a known speed reference, a step 336 comprising calibrating the point where the propeller shaft 120 sensor reading will rise and fall, and a step 338 comprising calculating where the propeller shaft 120 sensor reading will rise and fall.
The known speed reference may be the vehicle 100 wheel 116, 118 speed when the rear drive unit 112 clutch is engaged. In the step 336, the wheel 116, 118 speed may be utilized to determine the actual propeller shaft 120 rotational speed, which may be compared with the propeller shaft 120 risen and fallen position increment, or input pulse. The traditional rotational speed calculation method described in the Background may also be compared with the propeller shaft 120 rotational speed to perform the calibration step 334. In a step 340, an accurate estimation of the propeller shaft 120 rotational speed profile may then be made.
The routine 332 further includes a step 342 of determining an integral of the propeller shaft 120 rotational speed profile. Utilizing the integral of the propeller shaft 120 rotational speed profile and the sensor risen and fallen state times, the risen and fallen position increment may be estimated. Accuracy checks may be performed, as the sum of the risen and fallen position increment is known in advance, and is not subject to change. Filters may then be utilized to update the values for the risen and fallen position increment in a robust way. The filter utilized may include, but is not limited to, a Kalman filter and/or a (recursive) least square filter.
The on-line model adaptation 310 further includes a step 320 combining the propeller shaft 120 rotational speed sensor information with the model 316 of the clutch torque and clutch-actuation-motor position relationship. The step 320 allows the propeller shaft 120 friction to be determined, among other parameters. A step 322 of the on-line model adaptation 310 includes inputting the propeller shaft 120 friction parameter into the model 316. The friction parameter in the model 316 may be initialized, for example, by measuring the friction parameter of the clutch off-line. As the propeller shaft 120 friction changes during a clutch actuation event (e.g., static versus dynamic friction), the propeller shaft 120 friction is a parameter which is variable over the time of a clutch actuation event (see
The equations above illustrate the relationship between the model of the clutch torque and clutch-actuation-motor position, and the actual propeller shaft 120 rotational speed measurements. In the equations above, θi represents measured/estimated (relative) propeller shaft 120 rotational position, and the right hand side of the equations contains the processing of the model information. Tclutch,model represents modeled clutch torque; posclutch(t) represents measurement of the known position increment of the propeller shaft 120; Tfrict(t) represents propeller shaft 120 friction; and {dot over (ω)}prop represents modeled propeller shaft 120 rotational speed. Integration provides a robust estimation of the propeller shaft 120 rotational position. Several estimation algorithms, including, but not limited to, a Kalman filter and a recursive least square algorithm may be utilized to estimate the friction.
As illustrated in
The second part of the third phase 303 of the clutch actuation includes high-level control 314 of the propeller shaft 120. An embodiment of the high-level control 314 is illustrated in
The high-level control 314 utilizes the on-line 310 and off-line 312 model adaptations to account for the dynamics of the clutch actuation system and minimize any overshoot of the required propeller shaft rotational speed. Acceleration of the propeller shaft 120 is equal to zero when the required rotational speed is achieved. A model predictive control or a multi-loop control architecture can be utilized to minimize the overshoot of the required propeller shaft rotational speed.
An example of the multi-loop control architecture is illustrated in
A step 354 of the multi-loop control architecture also includes an adaptive feedforward. The feedforward ensures the dynamics of the clutch actuation system do not violate the constraint of minimal overshoot of the required propeller shaft 120 rotational speed.
The set-point for the propeller shaft 120 rotational speed may either be pre-determined or calculated while online, such that the propeller shaft 120 rotational speed set-point meets the speed difference criterion for the power transfer unit 114 engagement. The propeller shaft 120 rotational speed set-point may be adjusted on-line, and thereby allows, but is not limited to, a trade-off between the duration of the clutch actuation event and the allowed system noise, vibration, and harshness. The propeller shaft 120 rotational speed set-point is based on the instantaneous value of the driving side of the disconnect system, and, as such, varies during the acceleration of the propeller shaft 120.
Once the targeted propeller shaft 120 rotational speed set-point is reached, the propeller shaft 120 rotational speed control will ensure that the actual rotational speed remains within certain boundaries around the set-point, i.e., the set-point remains updated based on the driving side of the disconnect system speed.
While various embodiments of the presently disclosed subject matter have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example, and not limitation. It will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art(s) that the disclosed subject matter may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The embodiments described above are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative—not restrictive.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/032107 | 5/12/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/183324 | 11/17/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4709775 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4775581 | Siniscalchi | Oct 1988 | A |
5492194 | McGinn et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5605201 | McGinn et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5631829 | Takasaki et al. | May 1997 | A |
5819194 | Hara et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5867021 | Hancock | Feb 1999 | A |
5989146 | Brown et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6232739 | Krefta et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6450921 | Glab et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6714003 | Babin | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6815944 | Vig et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6922623 | Rieger et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6990354 | Kantola et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7026808 | Vig et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7054732 | Rieger et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7101310 | Smith et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7125364 | Cring | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7258648 | Smith et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7491145 | Mizon et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7603219 | Joshi et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611441 | Cring | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7813857 | Mizon et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8042642 | Marsh et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8047323 | Downs et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8050835 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8234050 | Burns et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8401756 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8442793 | Goodwin | May 2013 | B2 |
8584785 | Marsh et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
9272619 | Quehenberger et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9493069 | Marsh et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9638548 | Mialtu et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
20040040759 | Shimizu | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20070294017 | Joshi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080277240 | Kato | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100094519 | Quehenberger et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20120041654 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120247611 | Martin | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20160236568 | Quehenberger et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101084130 | Dec 2007 | CN |
102563034 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102008032476 | Jan 2010 | DE |
2933913 | Jan 2010 | FR |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office, International Search Report with Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2016/032107, dated Aug. 19, 2016, 10 pages, European Patent Office, Rijswijk, Netherlands. |
China National Intellectual Property Administration, Office Action in Application 201680027333.0, dated Oct. 8, 2018, 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180126848 A1 | May 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62160240 | May 2015 | US |