The invention described and claimed hereinbelow is also described in German Patent Application DE 19914600.4 filed on Mar. 3, 1999. This German Patent Application, whose subject matter is incorporated here by reference, provides the basis for a claim of priority of invention under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)–(d).
The invention is based on a method for synchronizing one or more receivers to a transmitter within a transmission system, using a data stream with guard intervals, in particular for compensating for multi-path propagation, and on a transmitter for preparing a synchronization train and a receiver for evaluating this synchronization train, and on a communications system.
It is assumed for instance that one transmitter serves one or more receivers. The transmitters sends one or more packets to the receivers at the same instant.
In a transmission system, which in particular uses OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing), the problem of synchronization arises. In OFDM transmission, the transmission symbols are modulated over a plurality of subcarriers in the frequency range by a generally digital type of modulation [1]. The subcarriers are then transformed into the time range together by an IFFT (Inverse Fast Fourier Transformation) and then transmitted.
In the receiver, it is necessary to reconstruct some information by way of the signal transmitted, especially to reconstruct the beginning of the block and the center frequency error.
To ascertain the beginning of the block, the chronological position of the signal to be received must be known. For this purpose, a two-stage method is usually used, according to which first a coarse and then a fine detection of the beginning of the block are performed in succession.
In the normal situation, the receiver has a center frequency error compared to the sensor. In the case of OFDM, this error is especially critical, because it can cause a disruption of orthogonality, which leads to increased bit errors. The frequency synchronization serves to correct this frequency difference.
In a communications system with transmission of relatively short data packets, to achieve a synchronization, two identical synchronization symbols, especially OFDM symbols, are made to precede a transmission burst in accordance with [2], [3] and [4], and these are transmitted twice with a predetermined spacing. The position of these signals can be determined by evaluation of the metrics.
To avoid intersymbol interferences (ISI), a guard interval is often inserted into the transmitter in conjunction with the OFDM transmission technique, the length of which guard interval is adapted to the duration of the channel pulse response. In order for there not to be any actual disruption in the receiver from chronologically adjacent symbols, the instant of synchronization, that is, the onset of the ISI-free signal portion, is ascertained before the data evaluation in the receiver. The ascertainment of this instant is called block or symbol synchronization. When the pulse response of the present channel is shorter than the guard interval, the block synchronization need not ascertain the beginning of the ON state precisely; instead, the result is an allowable synchronization interval.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method for synchronization, in which the precision of synchronization can be improved considerably over known methods. While the known methods can actually be used only for coarse block synchronization, the method according to the invention offers quite precise results both in terms of fine block estimation and frequency estimation. The embodiment according to the invention is advantageously suitable as a transmission method for OFDM. If a coherent demodulation is provided, then the synchronization train can be used for block synchronization, and estimating the center frequency error can also be used to estimate the channel pulse response.
The effort and expense for implementing the method of the invention is hardly higher than in known methods but provides increased accuracy of the estimate, especially of the center frequency error.
The method according to the invention, and a corresponding transmitter and receiver, are advantageously suitable for use in radio systems, specifically in normal bidirectional communications systems with variable distribution of the roles if transmitter and receiver and in broadcasting systems, in which the roles of transmitter and receiver are static over time.
As a transmission medium, not only radio but also a line connected transmission can be provided, for instance via coaxial cable or a shielded or unshielded pair of conductors in a line network. In hybrid communications systems as well, that is, systems with radio components, line-connected components, and/or light source conductor components, the invention can advantageously be used.
OFDM is especially suitable as the type of modulation. But even in systems without OFDM, where transmission methods are used in which a guard interval is provided to compensate for multi-path propagation, the invention can advantageously be employed.
In conjunction with the drawings, exemplary embodiments will be explained in further detail. Shown are:
Before the actual embodiment according to the invention will be addressed, for the sake of better comprehension synchronization according to the prior art will be explained. For the following observations, it will be assumed that in
The transmitter S of a subscriber sends one or more data packets to the receivers E1, E2, E3 at one instant; the duration of the packets can be either constant or variable. The situation can generally also change in such a way that one of the subscribers later switches over dynamically from the reception mode to the transmission mode, and a transmitting subscriber and/or the other receiving subscribers then operate in the reception mode.
It is also assumed that OFDM is used as the transmission method; see [1], [3], [4]. To that end, the transmission symbols over a plurality of subcarriers are modulated in the frequency range by a generally digital type of modulation. The subcarriers are then transformed into the time range together by an IFFT (Inverse Fast Fourier Transformation) and then transmitted.
Since in a communication system only short data packets are transmitted, fast synchronization is urgently needed. This can be achieved only with the aid of a special synchronization symbol, which is made to precede the data packet in the transmitter.
One known method of block synchronization, found in sources [2] and [3], is to evaluate a signal A={ri} of length N, which is transmitted twice at the spacing P; see
The criterion for the beginning of the block is indicated by the index i, at which the metrics have their minimal phase:
The block synchronization in the OFDM should, on the basis of the periodic preamble, indicate the interference-free range of the subsequent data blocks. To that end, the correlation window is shortened relative to the sequence length by the length of the guard interval.
This method described above is actually used for coarse block synchronization. In principle, it therefore offers only quite imprecise results, in terms of both fine block estimation and frequency estimation.
The transmitter S of
two different symbol sequences A and B of the same length L1 with ideally favorable autocorrelation properties are selected. In the case of OFDM, these can be OFDM symbols, which have the same length as or a different length from a normal data symbol;
the two symbol sequences A and B are always transmitted in such a way that in alternation, A is transmitted twice and B is transmitted twice, as in
The chronological position of the signal to be received between the transmitter S and receiver E is ascertained from a composite term, in particular the total metrics, of the various symbol sequences, in this case the pairs of symbol sequences, within a predetermined interval.
Then in the receiver the total metrics λ2, from the sum of individual metrics λ over all the identical sequence pairs (AI, Am) and (BI, Bm), where 1≦1, m≦M and m>, become the following:
In this equation, s (X,Y) designates the relative starting index for the signal interval X, and Δ (X,Y) designates the spacing between the two pairs of signals X,Y.
Whichever index Istart that minimizes the metrics λS within an interval IRS predetermined by the frame synchronization is selected as the beginning of the block:
In the frequency estimation, the problem arises that the phase rotation between two identical symbols (A1, Am) and (B1, Bm) can exceed 360°, so that the resultant multivalence must first be solved. As the reference frequency fref for this, the estimated frequency position fo from the phase rotation Φ01
of two adjacent periodic segments each must be used, since here the capture range, where |fo||<fa/(n L1) is greatest:
where
To achieve the most secure possible frequency estimation, once again the phase rotations for all the other pairs of intervals (A1, Am) and (B1, Bm) must be taken into account. Let MAδ<MA be the set of all the pairs (A1, Am) and (B1, Bm) with the same spacing Δ(A1, Am) and Δ(B1, Bm) and let δmax be the number of different sets MA/Bδ1, then the overall result for the estimated value of the center frequency error fo is:
where
The coefficients c5 are weighting factors, with which the different noise, levels, which are superimposed on the estimated phase values, are taken into account. They result on the one hand from the number of sequence pairs that are taken into account and on the other from the spacing (X,Y) of the frequency pairs. The function [paste in, page 9, line 4] solves the multivalence of the phase [ditto, line 5] on the basis of the estimated phase value [ditto, line 6] ascertained beforehand.
According to the invention, the symbols indicated can also be used for channel estimation, if they are known in the transmitter and the receiver. To that end, the synchronization symbols, once the frequency correction has been done, are FFT-processed in the receiver, and the amplitude weights and phase weights of the individual subcarriers are determined. If the synchronizing signals (A and B) are shorter than a normal OFDM symbol, then the phase weights and amplitude weights of the subcarriers not transmitted must be ascertained by interpolation. The fact that a plurality of known synchronizing symbols are used can be exploited for the sake of averaging the channel parameters over the known symbols, so as to increase the accuracy of the channel estimation.
It should now be assumed that the transmitter places a preamble in accordance with
The metrics for the block synchronization in this case are calculated as follows:
λS(i)=λ(i,L1,L1)+λ(i, L1,4L1)+λ(i+L1L1,3L1, 3L1)
+λ(i+L1,L1,4L1)+λ(i+4L1,L1,L1)+λ(i+2L1,L1,L1)
The individual metrics corresponds to the pairs (A1, A2), (A1, A3), (A1, A4), (A2, A3), (A2, A4), (B1, B2). The starting value for the block is:
Istart=arg miniλS(i)
For the frequency synchronization, the center frequency error fo is calculated as follows:
φu1=arg{w(istart,L1,L1)+w(istart+2L1,L1,L1)+W(istart+4L1,L1,L1)},
φu2=arg{w(istart,L1,4L1)+w(istart+l1,L1,4L1)}
One possible realization of the transmitter is shown in
One possible version of the receiver is shown in
Next, alternatives for realizing the method of the invention will be presented:
in the method for calculating the total metrics, it is also possible not to take all the possible pairs into account. In the exemplary embodiment, the calculation prescription for the block synchronization would for instance change as follows:
λS(i)=λ(i,L1,L1)+λ(i,L1,4L1)+λ(i+L1,L1,4L1)+λ(i+L1,L1,2L1,L1,L1)
The individual metrics would in this case correspond to the pairs (A1, A2), (A1, A3), (A2, A4), (A3, A4), (B1, B2).
It is equally possible in the method for calculating the center frequency error to use only some of the possible angle errors in calculating the equation for Φoδ.
Under some circumstances, it is favorable to insert guard intervals before the individual frequency pairs. If S is a guard interval of arbitrary length (in general, the periodic continuation of a symbol), the result is thus for example the trains SAASBBSAA. The calculation prescriptions described above logically apply, and the guard intervals are not evaluated.
By the method described above, the signal trains A and B are each transmitted in pairs a plurality of times in succession. The method for block and frequency synchronization can be analogously used if the signal trains occur individually one after the other, such as the train ABAB. It is equally possible for the trains A and B not be inserted in pairs but each more than twice. One example of a train for a triple occurrence each time would be AAABBBAAA. The calculation prescriptions given above logically apply.
It is furthermore possible to use more than two different signal trains, such as three different signal trains A, B and C. The rule in this case would be that at least one signal train is put together as a pair, with a spacing of more than one further pair of other signal trains, to make a synchronizing symbol.
It is also possible to transmit the various signal trains not directly in succession but rather with a certain spacing from one another.
The method presented is based on the fact that the various signal trains each have the same length. It is also possible to use different signal trains A and B that have different lengths. The calculation prescriptions logically apply and must be adapted in detail for this purpose.
Literature:
[1] W. Zou, Y, Wu, “COFDM: an Overview”, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Vol. 41, No. 1, March 1995
[2] Chevillat, P. R., Mainwald, D., Ungerboeck, G. (1987), Rapid Training of a Voiceband Data-Modem Receiver Employing an Equalizer with Fractional-T Spaced Coefficients, IEEE Transactions on Communications 35(9), 869–876
[3] Müller-Weinfurtner, S. H. (1998), On the Optimality of Metrics for Coarse Frame Synchronization in OFDM: a Comparison, 9th IEEE PIMRC '98
[4] Müller-Weinfurtner, S. H. Rüβler, J. F., Huber, J. B. (1998), Analysis of a Frame- and Frequency Synchronizer for Bursty OFDM, Proceedings of the 7th CTMC at IEEE Globecom '98, pp.201–206.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
199 14 600 | Mar 1999 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE00/00915 | 3/28/2000 | WO | 00 | 3/1/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO00/60805 | 10/12/2000 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5372113 | Smith | Dec 1994 | A |
5532585 | Oudet et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5732113 | Schmidl et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5809083 | Wright | Sep 1998 | A |
6654429 | Li | Nov 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29 23 644 | Dec 1979 | DE |
44 46 639 | Jul 1996 | DE |
197 38 316 | Mar 1999 | DE |
0 529 421 | Mar 1993 | EP |
96 02990 | Feb 1996 | WO |