The present invention relates to the field of the control of gear shifts in a gearbox.
More specifically, it relates to a method of synchronizing a gear on a parallel-shaft vehicle gearbox comprising at least one primary shaft connected to a power source, a secondary shaft driven by the primary shaft to transmit the motive torque to the wheels over several transmission ratios, and at least one means of coupling a gear to its shaft in order to engage a transmission ratio without mechanical synchronizing members.
This invention applies to any parallel-shaft transmission in which gear shifts with a break in transmission of torque are performed by moving a means of coupling between two transmission-ratio gears that are free to rotate on a shaft connected to the wheels of the vehicle.
It finds a nonlimiting application in a hybrid transmission for a motor vehicle provided with a combustion engine and with an electric drive machine, comprising two concentric primary shafts each one bearing at least one gear transmitting to a secondary shaft connected to the wheels of the vehicle and a first means of coupling between two primary shafts which can occupy three positions, in which positions: the combustion engine is uncoupled from the drive line connecting the electric machine to the wheels, it drives the wheels with or without top-up from the electric machine, or it is coupled to the electric machine so that their torque can be combined.
As mentioned earlier on, the first coupling means 5 can occupy at least three positions, in which positions:
In electric mode (cf.
Publication FR 2 933 247 discloses a method for coupling a shaft of an electric machine with a wheel shaft for an electric or hybrid vehicle. The method described involves the following steps:
With this method, the electric machine is made to operate first of all in order to reach a speed close, but not exactly equal, to that of the shaft connected to the wheels; a synchronizing device then completes the equalizing of the speeds between the two shafts, then final dog-clutch engagement of the transmission ratio is performed.
The present invention seeks to dispense with the mechanical synchronizer.
To this end, it proposes keeping the electric machine operating until the speeds of the shaft of the electric machine and of the shaft connected to the wheels are completely equalized, disregarding the step-down ratio.
To do so, the invention plans for the power source to be made to operate in such a way as to produce a reference torque control signal T1ref, reference torque equal to the minimum transmittable torque to minimize the discrepancy ω2K−ω1 between the primary speed ω1 and the secondary speed ω2 multiplied by the reduction ratio (K) as the relevant gear is being coupled to its shaft.
For preference, the reference torque control signal T1ref is controlled by feeding back a correction term into the discrepancy between the primary and secondary speeds ω2K−ω1.
The present invention will be better understood from reading the following description of one nonlimiting embodiment thereof, with reference to the attached drawings in which:
In
In
As indicated above, the problem encountered with this box is that of synchronizing the speeds of the two shafts 6 and 10 before beginning the phase of coupling the two shafts by dog-clutching the gears. When the coupler 5 is not provided with synchronizing rings. The matter is therefore that of synchronizing, without a mechanical synchronizing member, a gear on a parallel-shaft vehicle gearbox comprising at least one primary shaft connected to a power source, a secondary shaft driven by the primary shaft in order to engage a transmission ratio. This synchronization needs to be completely transparent to the driver, and take place with the torque demand continuing to be met. This problem arises in particular when shifting between the two electric transmission ratios, such shifts taking place with a break in torque through the dog-clutching of the gears 8 and 9 with the secondary shaft 10.
In the gearbox illustrated in
Assuming that, in the initial state, the two shafts are completely uncoupled, and applying the fundamental principle of mechanics, the following dynamic model is obtained:
which equations are fundamental equations of dynamics in which J1 is the inertia with respect to the primary shaft, J2 the inertia with respect to the secondary shaft, and Td1 and Td2 are the resistive torques on these shafts, which are unknown exogenic inputs.
The calculation in
The result of this calculation is a reference torque control signal “T1ref” for the electric machine 7, which allows the speed ω1 of the primary shaft 6 to be synchronized with the speed ω2 of the secondary shaft 10, disregarding the step-down ratio K.
According to the invention, the power source is therefore made to operate in such a way as to produce the reference torque control signal T1ref, which torque is equal to the minimum transmittable torque, in order to minimize the discrepancy ω2K−ω1 between the primary speed ω1 and the secondary speed ω2 multiplied by the reduction ratio K, as the relevant gear is being coupled to its shaft.
In order to produce the reference signal “T1ref”, it is necessary first of all to multiply the speed ω2mes measured on the secondary shaft 10 by a first gain K which is the reduction ratio between the power source and the secondary shaft 10, so that this can be compared against the measured speed ω1mes of the primary shaft 6. Integrating the discrepancy between the speeds ω2K−ω1 twice and multiplying it by a gain Kï, gives an “integral action T1int”. The product ω2mes.Kw provides an anticipation value “T1anti”. The primary speed ω1mes is multiplied by a third gain Ks to provide a state feedback “T1ret”. The signals generated by the integral action “T1int”, the anticipation “T1anti” and the state feedback “T1ret” are summed. One original feature of this device lies in the feeding-back of “KrT1int” into the speeds comparison term. The reference torque control signal (T1ref) is thus controlled by feeding back a corrective term into the discrepancy between the primary and secondary speeds (ω2K−ω1). The corrective term correcting the discrepancy in the speeds ω2K−ω1 is proportional to T1int. This feedback loop guarantees that when the speeds are synchronized, namely when ω2mesK=ω1mes, the torque T1ref is the minimum that can be transmitted in order to achieve that, even when the secondary speed varies, namely when:
The torque control signal “T1ref” for the electric machine, which is the result of the calculation of
and
The constants Kw and Ks are fixed in such a way as to ensure the stability of the reference torque signal T1ref. In order to calculate the gains Kr, Ks, Kw, and Ki, the overall stability conditions required for the control signal and those from the specifications, namely the response time (time needed for the speed ω1 to reach 95% of Kω2) and overshoot (max value in excess of the value Kω2) need to be set.
In conclusion, the strategy implemented by the invention makes it possible to minimize the torque at the coupler during the phase of coupling following synchronization. The speed discrepancy decreases very rapidly to reach a value of around 30 revolutions per minute, which allows coupling to be performed smoothly. The method thus allows the next phase of coupling the two shafts to be made as transparent as possible as far as the user is concerned, despite the resumption of torque, namely as smoothly as possible. It notably allows control over paths of a sloping nature, which correspond to the unfavorable cases of heavy braking. Finally, because there are no longer any abrupt take-ups of torque, wear on the mechanical parts of the coupling system is limited.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
12 53053 | Apr 2012 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2013/050590 | 3/19/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/150205 | 10/10/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5803869 | Jamzadeh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
7373233 | Gianoglio et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
20060287794 | Gianoglio et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080109142 | Endo | May 2008 | A1 |
20090233757 | Soliman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100113219 | Corigliano et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20120259494 | Schaeffer et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10 2006 019 239 | Oct 2007 | DE |
2 138 371 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2 954 441 | Jun 2011 | FR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued Jun. 6, 2013, in PCT/FR2013/050590, filed Mar. 19, 2013. |
French Preliminary Search Report issued Dec. 5, 2012, in Patent Application No. FR 1253053, filed Apr. 3, 2012 (with English Translation of Category of Cited Documents). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150051799 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |