The present invention relates to a system and method of starting a water jet propulsion system for a ship, said propulsion system including a stator shell adapted to be mounted to the hull and having a nozzle ending in an outlet with a cross-sectional outlet area, an impeller housing attached to the stator shell and having an upstream inlet, and an impeller rotatably mounted in the impeller housing for receiving water from the inlet and discharging it through the nozzle of the stator shell so as to create a water jet upon rotation of the impeller, said method including reducing the outlet area by partly closing the nozzle during a start up phase of the water jet propulsion system,
To start up a large water jet propulsion unit for a ship, there is a need to have sufficient water in the impeller housing and/or take special measures, to obtain propulsion. This problem does not exist in conjunction with most water jet crafts, but only for ships powered by water jet, where of some reason a substantial portion of the impeller housing at occasion will be positioned above the water line, i.e. the water jet unit is not wholly submerged but is only partly located under the surface. Then it is necessary to carry out what is commonly known as “priming”, meaning that the impeller housing has to be filled with water, in connection with the start up phase, as is known per se.
In JP 7215294, a water jet propulsion unit is primed be means of vacuum from a tank connected to a vacuum pump, and further U.S. Pat. No. 3,970,027 discloses a priming means for a bow steering pump and utilizing a vacuum pump to fill the bow steering pump with water. Accordingly an additional pump has to be used which is costly and is also a risk factor from a view point of reliability.
JP 1262289 discloses a water jet propulsion unit, where quick starting is enabled by spraying a partial water jet pressurized by a pump impeller to the inside of a water duct of a front flow part of the pump impeller at the time of low headway by a water nozzle, and avoiding any cavitation at the pump suction side. Hence, also their solution uses additional machining causing the same disadvantage as mentioned above.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,634,831 discloses another known solution, that is complex and/or costly and that also includes aspects of uncertainty regarding reliability. It depicts a water jet propulsion unit using two counter rotating impellers. The nozzle section includes a throttled outlet to allow for a high mass/low pressure operation while maintaining pump priming. In one embodiment, the throttling device utilizes two spring-loaded flaps mounted inside the nozzle section upstream the ejection opening thereof and moving back into a recess provided in the wall of the nozzle section as the flow rate increases. In another embodiment, the throttling device includes a series of thin flexible strips fixed to a circular rim. A flexible rubber ring or a coil spring is provided at the free ends of the flexible strips to make the form a contracted nozzle opening. A thin rubber sleeve is fitted over the strips to prevent water loss when pressure increases and makes the nozzle opening expand.
JP-06-001288 shows a further known solution to assist in priming. Here a movable cone-shaped part is provided that is intended to be moved to a blocking position during priming, i.e. totally blocking the outlet. It is evident that such a solution is complex and costly. Moreover it requires complex control mechanisms, that are disadvantageous, not at least from the view point of reliability.
Further U.S. Pat. No. 6,422,904 B1 and WO 9821090, present known alternatives for enabling priming of a water jet propulsion unit. Both relate to small vessles using two counter rotating impellers and a spring-loaded flexible skirt, which helps to facilitate priming and control of pressure inside the unit. Also these latter solutions present disadvantages, and especially so in relation to larger water jet units.
The object of the present invention is to eliminate or at least minimize any of the disadvantages mentioned above, which is achieved by a method defined in claim 1. Thanks to the invention, somewhat surprisingly it is possible to accomplish the desired degree of priming without a need to totally physically block the outlet, based on the findings that sufficient priming is achieved by providing air back flowing means, that hinders air to enter into the impeller housing through the outlet during start up. By means of the invention it is possible to achieve successful priming in situations when the inlet of the impeller housing is submerged as little as 15% (of its vertical extension, i.e. diameter of inlet if circular), sometimes even down to or close to 10%.
In the method defined in the first paragraph above, this object is achieved in accordance with the present invention by providing an arrangement that is mounted at the nozzle outlet, which hinders air to back flow through the outlet, into the impeller housing, providing reliable and cost efficient solutions thanks to the finding in accordance with the invention that there is no need of totally physically blocking the outlet to achieve the desired hindering of air back flow, if a synergistic use of the jet stream out of the outlet nozzle is provided for, during the priming stage, to achieve said air back flow hindering. Further, according to a preferred aspect of the invention this in turn facilitates the use of hindering and/or blocking arrangements that are designed to be automatically “in-activated” by the jet stream as soon as its flow has increased sufficiently, i.e. as soon as priming has successfully been accomplished.
According to another aspect of the invention the arrangement comprises at least one blocking member movable between at least two positions, one adapted to block most of the outlet area, and the other adapted to avoid forming unnecessary flow restrictions at the nozzle outlet.
Thanks to the invention priming of a water jet propulsion system is easily and reliably achieved by means of a cost effective solution.
According to a further aspect of the invention, the object is achieved in that the water jet propulsion system comprises at least two pivotal flaps, which are mounted at the nozzle outlet and are movable between two end positions, one adapted to block most of the outlet area, and the other adapted to avoid forming unnecessary flow restrictions at the nozzle outlet.
In the following, the invention will be described in more detail with reference to preferred embodiments and the appended drawings.
a are detailed views of an embodiment of a resilient mechanism according to the invention, and
The water jet propulsion units shown in
It is evident to the skilled person that priming, according to the invention, is merely needed in situations where the impeller housing is only partly submerged below a certain level. Normally there is no need of priming if the impeller housing is submerged to about 50%, i.e. that the vertically extending distance D7 of the impeller inlet 7 is filled with water to at least 50%. Below a level of 50% many water jets, depending on the design of the impeller, will have problems during the start up phase. Indeed all water jets will encounter such problems if the level is very low. Tests have shown that in some installations it may be possible to accomplish a successful start up of the water jet having levels as low as about 10%, by means of the invention.
As shown in
A major advantage of the invention is that there is no need for 100% blocking of the outlet 5, which leads to numerous possibilities to use various designs that may fulfill functionality in accordance with that principle. As a consequence very cost efficient solutions, compared to existing prior art, may be used. However, the basic principle of the invention does not exclude use of 100% blockage.
In the embodiment shown in
The flaps 8 and 9 may be manually controlled or controlled by any conventional control unit, not shown.
In a preferred embodiment, adjacent one of the hinges 11, there is arranged a resilient mechanism 17, 18 (see
As shown in
The function of an arrangement according to the invention, with reference to
Thanks to a preferred aspect of the invention the hindering arrangement is such that the blocking effect thereof will automatically be eliminated by the power of the full jet stream. Accordingly the flaps 7, 8 will be forced out of their closed position into an unobstructing position. Hence, the blocking devices will automatically be moved out of a position where it otherwise could hinder the propulsive flow.
Further it is foreseen that the flaps 8, 9 may be arranged with further means to allow for an adjustability of the degree of blockage that is achieved in their blocking position. This may for instance be achieved by having the flap divided into two slidable units, to allow for the outer portion/edge thereof to be adjusted into different positions, allowing the range of blockage to be adjusted.
Further according to the preferred embodiment the flaps 8, 9 have the hinges 11 arranged on the outside of the outlet 5 and preferably in a plane that is upstream in relation to the plane of the outlet. Thanks to using exterior hinged flaps no influence will be made upon the flow upstream out of the impeller housing.
According to the embodiment shown in
As mentioned above the hinge mechanisms may be provided with some kind of resilient mechanism 17, that will exert a resilient force to pivot the flaps 8, 9, both in the direction of its closing position as well as in the direction of being fully opened. As is generally well known there are several known principles that can be used to achieve this kind of resiliently urging mechanism to that has a kind of instable intermediate position (e.g. halfway open) where it will on one side of it urge the flap 8, 9 into its open position and on the other side of it will urge the flap to its closing position. An advantage is that then there is no need for any control mechanism to maneuver the flaps from its closed position to its opened position, which is especially advantageous regarding big, powerful water jets, since as soon as the impeller is working properly an enormous flow will occur and as a consequence a very high pressure will be exerted. If the flaps would not then be moved out of their closed position (e.g. due to an erroneous maneuver/control system) it is possible that they would be destroyed or removed from their positions. For movement of the flaps 8, 9 from their opened outer position to their closed position there is however a need to attach a pivotal force, which may be achieved in many different ways, e.g. by applying a wire within the tubes 12, 13 and pulling that wire to pivot the flaps 8, 9, inwardly, past the intermediate position.
In
According to a further embodiment indicated in
Somewhat, surprisingly it has been established by testing that also this kind of totally “un-blocking” principle may in some applications be sufficient to enable desired air hindering. As is understood this provides many advantages, e.g. no need to move any obstructing/blocking parts at inactivation, no need of mechanical parts that may wear.
The invention is not limited by what is described above, but may be varied within the scope of the claims. For instance, the skilled person realizes that flaps may be arranged in other ways than pivotal, e.g. sliding and that the size, number and configuration of the flaps may be varied within wide ranges and still fulfilling the function according to the invention. Further it is realized that flaps may be used also during propelling the ship, e.g. to influence the characteristic of the jet flow adjacent the outlet, which may have a beneficial effect, e.g. regarding power out put.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0800687 | Mar 2008 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2009/050318 | 3/26/2009 | WO | 00 | 11/4/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/120143 | 10/1/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3212258 | Gongwer | Oct 1965 | A |
5634831 | Davies et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
6193569 | Davies et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6422904 | Davies et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
06001288 | Nov 1994 | JP |
U-H06-87193 | Dec 1994 | JP |
740606 | Jun 1980 | SU |
WO 9821090 | May 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/SE2009/050318 mailed Jul. 3, 2009. |
Japanese Rejection Notice in corresponding JP Application No. 2011-501749 on Jul. 30, 2013 in English and Japanese, 4 pages. |
Japanese Utility Model Application No. 05-035155 published on Dec. 20, 1994 as Japanese Utility Model Application Publication No. 06-087193, English translation supplied by PAJ, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110045717 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |