Roofing systems of buildings with low pitch or flat roofs typically use waterproof membranes to prevent water from entering into the building. Large sheets of such membranes are welded or glued to one another, depending on the material of the membrane, to form continuous sheets that cover the entire surface of the roof.
Membranes require termination of one kind or another at least at a perimeter edge of the roof Because the perimeter edge of the roof is an area that experiences forces that act in different directions as well as being an area where wind vortices create low pressure regions, the roof is prone to expansion and contraction as well as wind failure in this area. Parapet walls and sheet metal gutters, gravel stops and fascia finishes can leak in this area damaging conventional perimeter membrane terminations. Typical edge termination practices such as; nailers, termination bars, reinforced membrane strips and fasteners are prone to failure for mainly two reasons: first, the pulling of the membrane due to high winds eventually tears the membrane at the stress concentration points created by the small discrete or non-uniform areas of membrane retention; and second, moisture finds its way to the boards in which the retaining features are embedded, causing rotting that eventually results in the fasteners coming loose from the boards. Once the membrane is no longer retained at the perimeter of the roof, winds can easily peal it away allowing water from rain and snow to enter the building through the unprotected roof.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for improvements in retention of waterproof roof membranes, particularly at the perimeter of a roof.
Disclosed herein is an assembly that relates to a roof assembly comprising, at least one first waterproof membrane for covering a building roof, a stiff member sealed within at least one second waterproof membrane, the stiff member being substantially aligned with a perimeter of the building roof, and the first waterproof membrane being sealedly attached to the second waterproof membrane. The stiff member being attached to a structure of the building by a plurality of fasteners.
Further disclosed is a system that relates to a hurricane resistant roof perimeter waterproofing system comprising, at least one first waterproofing membrane and at least one second waterproofing membrane being sealed to the at least one first waterproofing membrane. A plurality of stiff members encapsulated by the at least one first waterproofing membrane or the at least one second waterproofing membrane, and a plurality of fasteners that attach the stiff member to a structure of a building.
Further disclosed herein is a method that relates to terminating an edge of a roof waterproofing membrane comprising, covering a building roof with at least one first waterproofing membrane, aligning at least one stiff member along a perimeter of the building roof, and covering the at least one stiff member within a second waterproofing membrane. Further, sealing the second waterproofing membrane to the first waterproofing membrane, and attaching the stiff member to the structure of the building.
The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:
Referring first to
Referring to
A waterproof field membrane 44 is installed onto roof insulation layer 22 by means of adhesive 26. The membrane 44 extends beyond the wall 12 far enough to have a wrap portion 46 of the membrane 44 back wrap around a stiff member 40 and allow an interior edge 48 to lay back upon a membrane portion 41 of the membrane 44. The interior edge 48 is attached to the membrane portion 41 thereby encapsulating the stiff member 40 within the waterproof membrane 44. The membrane 44 can be attached to itself or another membrane in a number of ways such as solvent welding, heat welding, contact adhesive gluing, or double sided adhesive taping, for example, hereafter referred to as welded or glued 49. The method chosen is the one most suitable for the roof waterproofing membrane chosen. The stiff member 40 is attached to the wrap membrane portion 46 with adhesive 26. Fasteners 42 shown here as nails may also be screws or other elongated retention devices that penetrate the building or roof decking structure, thereby providing a more robust anchoring of the membrane perimeter than is achieved by fastening to a nailer 38 alone. The fasteners 42 in this embodiment attach the encapsulated stiff member 40, which lies flush with a surface of the wall 12, to the building structure of the wall 12. The stiff member 40 lies on a side of the wall 12 opposite a side of the wall 12 in which the roof is positioned. Adhesive 26 is applied between the wrap membrane portion 46 and the wall 12 to prevent moisture ingress at that location and to provide added structural retention of the stiff member 40 and membrane portion 46 to the wall 12.
By sandwiching the membrane portion 46 between the stiff member 40 and the wall 12 the membrane portion 46 is retained uniformly along the length of the wall 12. This uniformity prevents the formation of any local stress risers, which could exceed the strength of the membrane material, resulting in tearing when the membrane portion 46 is pulled as occurs when wind blows up the side and over the roof creating a lower pressure on the upper surface of the membrane 44. Additionally, by being sealed in a waterproof envelope created by the encapsulating membrane portion 46 the stiff member 40 will remain dry; preventing it from rotting. Rotting of perimeter nailers 38 is problematic in that it allows fasteners, that are holding a membrane in place, to break free thereby increasing the load on the remaining fasteners, which results in tearing of the membrane, which can then be easily pealed back exposing the non-waterproof roof components to rain and snow.
In some embodiments of the invention the stiff member 40 may be made of any stiff material including plywood, oriented strand board (OSB), treated lumber, synthetic plastic sheeting, and metal, for example, although non-grained materials have an advantage of resisting splitting. Additionally the stiff member 40 has properties of stiffness such that it holds its shape even while being pulled nonuniformly by attachments to roof and building structures and membranes for example. By holding its shape the stiff member 40 distributes any loads applied to it over the entire body of the stiff member 40 thereby minimizing localized stress levels. Dimensions of six to ten inches in a substantially vertical direction and two to four feet in a substantially horizontal direction are therefore in accordance with the invention however the invention is not limited to these dimensions.
Referring to
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a new membrane referred to as a re-roof membrane 64 is applied over the original roof's field membrane 44. A separation member 62 (or matting-fleece 78 as shown in
Sealing the stiff member 40 in an encapsulation of membrane material without protrusions therethrough is desirable to minimize water intrusion. However, certain aspects of a roofing structure may make it difficult or impossible. A comparison of
In
A separate piece of membrane material referred to as flashing 75 is draped over the top of the parapet wall 72 and down over the protruded re-roof membrane portion 73, the stiff member 40 and the re-roof membrane 74. The flashing 75 is attached to the stiff member 40 with adhesive 26 and is either welded or glued 49 to the protruded re-roof membrane portion 73 and the re-roof membrane 74 to encapsulate the stiff member 40 inside a waterproof pocket of membrane material. The portion of the flashing 75, which is draped over the parapet wall 72, is attached to the parapet wall 72 with adhesive 26 forming a continuous watertight seal from the outer surface of the parapet wall 72 to the re-roof membrane 74. Fasteners 42 secure the stiff member 40, the membrane 73 and the insulation 22 to the structural roof deck panels 16.
Durability of the membranes to weather conditions is also an item of concern. In order to make the membrane more durable to such conditions some thermoplastic membrane materials are treated with ultraviolet (UV) stabilizers and anti-fungicides, for example. Due to cost reasons such treatments are commonly performed on only one side of the membrane materials, hereafter referred to as the weatherproof side 76, it is sometimes desirable to install membranes with this weatherproof side 76 on the outside. In embodiments of
Referring to
A seal 85 placed between the membrane 74 encapsulating the stiff member 40 and the lightweight concrete 84 prevents the ingress of air and water at that location. Butyl gum or other air and water sealing methods may be employed as seal 85.
Referring to
An angled cut 142 along an edge of the stiff member creates a channel 144 between the wall 93 and the angled cut 142. The channel 144 retains caulking 146 to seal the reversed membrane 95 to the wall 93. In addition, the corners 148 of the stiff member 140 are rounded-off to reduce stress and the potential for tearing of the membrane 95 that could result from a sharp corner.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
While the description above refers to particular embodiments of the present invention, it will be understood that many modifications may be made without departing from the spirit thereof. The accompanying claims are intended to cover such modifications as would fall within the true scope and spirit of the present invention.
This application is a Divisional application of U.S. Ser. No. 11/433,987, filed May 15, 2006, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1722988 | Waddington | Aug 1928 | A |
2137889 | Gillett | Jun 1936 | A |
2164790 | Smith | Mar 1937 | A |
2857861 | Trostle | May 1955 | A |
3483664 | Funk et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
3533201 | Tyler | Oct 1970 | A |
3585766 | Jamieson | Jun 1971 | A |
3680269 | Fischer, Jr. et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3735538 | Ramins | May 1973 | A |
3735540 | Thaler | May 1973 | A |
3763605 | Freeman | Oct 1973 | A |
4037372 | Patry | Jul 1977 | A |
4112632 | Simpson | Sep 1978 | A |
4155203 | Wolma | May 1979 | A |
4241549 | Hall, III et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4335557 | Morton | Jun 1982 | A |
4389826 | Kelly | Jun 1983 | A |
4403458 | Lolley | Sep 1983 | A |
4419850 | Butzen | Dec 1983 | A |
4439956 | House | Apr 1984 | A |
4445306 | Schauffele | May 1984 | A |
4483112 | Rueblinger | Nov 1984 | A |
4493175 | Coppola, Jr. | Jan 1985 | A |
4530193 | Ochs | Jul 1985 | A |
4557081 | Kelly | Dec 1985 | A |
4598507 | Hickman | Jul 1986 | A |
4641476 | Webb et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4649686 | Backenstow et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4662129 | Hickman | May 1987 | A |
4674253 | Young | Jun 1987 | A |
4712348 | Triplett et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4719723 | Van Wagoner | Jan 1988 | A |
4736561 | Lehr et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4759157 | Webb et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4780995 | Gittins | Nov 1988 | A |
4780999 | Webb et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4870796 | Hart et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
5088259 | Myers | Feb 1992 | A |
5181353 | Harrington, Jr. | Jan 1993 | A |
5212927 | Sheahan | May 1993 | A |
5311716 | Houssin | May 1994 | A |
5319908 | Van Erden et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5349804 | Van Erden et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5406765 | Brown | Apr 1995 | A |
5469671 | Rathgeber et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5584153 | Nunley et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5605020 | Chambers | Feb 1997 | A |
5720147 | Wenrick et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5740647 | Kelly | Apr 1998 | A |
5784845 | Imeokparia et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784846 | Godschalx | Jul 1998 | A |
5884446 | Hageman | Mar 1999 | A |
6006482 | Kelly | Dec 1999 | A |
6021616 | Mayle | Feb 2000 | A |
6092344 | Kelly | Jul 2000 | A |
6108981 | Sama et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108993 | Hageman | Aug 2000 | A |
6167660 | Sama | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6209283 | Folkersen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6401424 | Folkersen | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6427404 | Hageman | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6505455 | Georgeau | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6764260 | Nebesnak et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6845590 | Mills, Jr. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6871472 | Folkersen | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6912813 | Grizenko | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6912814 | Inzeo et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6922951 | Inzeo et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6945005 | Nunley | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7454876 | Kelly | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20010010141 | Folkersen | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020170254 | Ritland et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178671 | Gembala | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20050126099 | Kelly | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060010808 | Kelly | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060053702 | Kelly | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053717 | Kelly | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053718 | Kelly | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
CA OA Application No. 2,560,236 dated Nov. 15, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130174510 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11433987 | May 2006 | US |
Child | 13777703 | US |