This invention pertains to a method and a testing device for testing a container in which a pressure differential is created between a pressure inside the container and a pressure in its environment and from the behavior of one of the pressures, which constitutes a physical entity which is dependent from leakiness of the container, it is established whether the container satisfies predetermined test conditions. The method and testing device are particularly suited to testing the gas tightness of containers.
This invention pertains to a testing device such as is known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,029,464 and EP-A-O 313 678 and EP-A-O 432 143.
From these items a way is known that a pressure differential is to be created between a pressure in the interior of the container and a pressure in said container's environment in order to test the gas tightness of containers and, from the behavior of one of the pressures, it is to be established whether the container under test satisfies the gas-tightness conditions or volume conditions or not.
In this process the container to be tested is placed in a sealing chamber that is connected to a pressure medium source or a suction source; said arrangement is to be used to create the above-mentioned pressure differential. After the pressure differential is created, a pressure value for the environment of the container is stored as a starting condition in a reference pressure chamber, which is placed in front of a pressure differential sensor, and is compared with subsequent pressure values for the environment of the container.
The above-mentioned documents are thus declared to be an integral part of the present description.
A drawback to the known method is the fact that a pressure differential sensor with extremely accurate control valves must be provided to ensure that even very small leaks or slight deviations of the container volume from a nominal volume are detected.
The goal set for the present invention is to simplify this known method significantly. The method of the invention and the corresponding arrangement as described herein are exceptionally well suited for accomplishing this goal. More particularly, according to the method of the invention for testing containers in which a pressure differential is created between a pressure inside the container and a pressure in its environment and from the behavior of one of the pressures, it is established whether the container satisfies predetermined test conditions, after one of the pressures reaches a predetermined test value or after it has reached a maximum value and said value has been stored, subsequently said pressure is compared for a predetermined time to at least one value of one of the two pressures, in which case at least this one pressure value appears as an output signal of a pressure sensor. The method is especially useful for testing the gas tightness of the containers.
A test arrangement according to the invention for testing containers comprises a pressure or suction source, which can be effectively connected to a container to be tested with respect to its interior and exterior pressure, at least one pressure sensor and a pressure storage arrangement, wherein the pressure sensor is a converter that converts an input-side pressure value into an output-side electrical signal and the output of the sensor, on the one hand, and the output of an electronic pressure-value storage arrangement, on the other, are fed to a comparator unit.
Accordingly, a pressure differential sensor is no longer used, nor are pneumatic storage chambers; instead, the pressure that is of interest is determined by means of a relative-pressure sensor and converted into an electrical signal; when checking for leaks, this signal is stored at a predetermined time and compared with at least one subsequent value that is determined by this same sensor. When checking volume, a pressure value is pre-specified and stored as a basis for comparison. This obviates the need for awkward devices of the previously known type, namely the pressure differential sensor and, in particular, the stop valves that are quite difficult as regards control characteristics.
The method of the invention is implemented in a configuration wherein an electrical output signal of the sensor is compared to one or more predetermined values, e.g., on a computer into which the sensor output is entered. A value of the sensor output signal is stored as a pressure value. Either the pressure in the interior of the container or that in the environment of the container is increased or decreased, and a value of the pressure in the container or in the environment of the container is measured.
The preferable procedure is that both the source connection to admit the pressure medium or to ensure suction and the sensor input are hooked up to either the interior of the container or the container's environment.
The creation of the pressure differential can be done in different ways, with which the specialist is well acquainted from the above-mentioned documents. Thus, for example, the pressure differential can be created by carrying out pressurization or suction at a predetermined level for a predetermined time, and then analyzing both a pressure value that is reached and its plot. In addition, pressurization can be done to a predetermined pressure differential, and then the plot of the pressure value that is of interest can be observed.
As is known from the above-mentioned documents, pressurization can also be accomplished by precharging a pre-chamber with a predetermined volume to a predetermined pressure and then discharging said pre-chamber into the container or into an enclosure that is formed by a sealable chamber, thereby establishing equalized pressure in said pre-chamber and the one of said container and enclosure that is formed by a sealable chamber connected with the pre-chamber.
When checking volume, a volume that is dependent on the volume of the container, either the interior volume of said container itself or its volume differential compared to a testing chamber, can be pressurized by a predetermined quantity of pressure medium, or a predetermined amount of gas can be removed from this volume. The volume of the container is then determined from the resulting pressure.
Of course, the values that are measured are compared with nominal values or nominal plots, as in also known from the above-mentioned documents.
Storage, wherein the pressure in the environment of the container is increased or decreased and a value of the pressure of the environment of the container is measured, is preferably undertaken in such a way that, with control at a predetermined time, an analog/digital converter is enabled to convert the sensor output signal, and the then stationary output signal of this analog/digital converter is used as a reference value for the subsequent analysis of the sensor output signal. In this process, either another analog/digital converter can be installed behind the sensor output and the output signal of the latter converter can then be digitally compared to that of the storage unit A/D converter or, preferably, a D/A converter is placed immediately behind the storage A/D converter and thus the stored, re-converted signal is fed as an analog reference signal to an analog comparator unit, to which the output signal of the sensor is also fed directly.
In addition, wherein the pressure in the environment of the container is increased or decreased and a value of the pressure of the environment is measured, a null balance is preferably undertaken by determining, essentially during the value storage process at the comparator, whether an output signal of the device encompasses the null value, at least approximately; if a signal appears that deviates from the null value or from a predetermined minimum value, then said signal is used as a null-balance signal.
Preferred embodiments of the test arrangement of the invention for testing containers comprise a pressure or suction source which can be effectively connected to a container to be tested with respect to its interior and exterior pressure, at least one pressure sensor, an electronic pressure-value storage arrangement and a comparator unit. The pressure sensor is a converter that converts an input-side pressure value into an output-side electrical signal. Means are provided for feeding the output of the sensor, on one hand, and the output of the electronic pressure-value storage arrangement, on the other to the comparator unit to commence a measuring test interval at a point in time immediately after the input-side pressure value of the sensor reaches risingly a predetermined test value and rereaches the predetermined test value diminishingly.
The invention is hereinafter explained by way of examples, using figures.
As mentioned,
At or in chamber 3 is another relative-pressure sensor 11, which converts the input-side pressure value into an electrical output signal. Via a storage control circuit, as indicated in the schematic by S, electrical output signal el from sensor 11 is stored in a storage unit 13 in response to a control signal s that is emitted by a time control unit (not shown). Output signal elo from storage unit 13 is fed to a comparator unit 15 as a pressure reference value. Output signal el of sensor 11 is present directly at said comparator unit's second input. After reference value elo is stored, the plot of the pressure in chamber 3 is monitored at comparator unit 15.
Let us now first consider leakage testing. If container 1 is sealed and storage has been done in storage unit 13, then sensor output signal el will remain at stored value elo once all differential-induced shape changes in container 1 have subsided. On the output side of comparator 15, a comparison result that at least approximately equals zero indicates that container 1 is sealed.
If leaks are present in container 1, after reference value e10 is stored as mentioned, signal value e1 will vary depending on the direction of the pressure gradient across the container wall; the higher the rate of variation, the larger the leak. On the output side of comparator 15 there will be an output signal. The value of this output signal is a function of the change in pressure in chamber 3 from the reference pressure associated with the stored pressure reference value e10.
Comparing the output signal of comparator unit 15 with predetermined nominal values (not shown) provides an indication, on the one hand, as to whether a leak is present as well as, on the other, as to how large said leak is. Depending on the containers to be tested, minor leaks may be tolerated.
If the leak in container 1 is large, then absolutely no pressure differential will develop across the walls of container 1: the pressures between the interior of the container and its environment will quickly equalize via the leak. Then, however, on the output side of comparator 15 a null signal will appear, i.e., just as in the case of a sealed container, and lead to testing errors.
Therefore, as indicated by the dotted lines, preferably after value elo is stored in storage unit 13, this stored value is compared to a reference value ref at another comparator unit 17. The output signal of other comparator unit 17 indicates whether a large leak is present or not. Either when a predetermined amount of pressure medium is allowed to enter chamber 3 or when a predetermined amount of gas is removed from said chamber, in the case of a large leak the pressure value indicated by reference value ref will not be reached; this will cause the test result at container 1 to be indicated by the output signal of other comparator 17.
To test volume, a predetermined amount of pressure medium is fed to chamber 3 or a predetermined amount of gas is removed therefrom. As indicated by dotted lines at ref1, storage unit 13 is used here as a reference-value storage unit in which reference values corresponding to the nominal volumes of containers that are to be tested are prestored. By comparing above-mentioned volume reference values ref, and the pressure value that actually arises corresponding to el in the volume differential in chamber 3 that is dependent on the interior volume of container 1, i.e., from the output signal of comparator unit 15, a determination is made as to whether container 1 has nominal volume or not, or how large the nominal/actual volume differential is.
In the case of the embodiment shown in
As in
In the case of the arrangement shown in
Converter unit 21 and storage unit 27 are controlled via a timing signal generator 29. This arrangement works as follows:
To store value e10 as shown in
As indicated in reference to
Unlike what is indicated in the case of the preferred embodiments mentioned above, it is readily possible to omit the second converter stage, namely digital/analog converter 21b, and instead, as indicated at 22b by dotted lines, to provide an analog/digital converter and then subsequently to process both signals, i.e., elo and el, digitally.
To check volume, either volume reference values are predetermined at converter unit 21, provided, as indicated by dotted lines at ref1, or another digital storage unit is connected to digital/analog converter 21b directly in order to convert input digital volume reference values into the corresponding analog signals and thus to use the arrangement shown to perform volume measurement as well.
The unit that is shown is exceptionally well suited for inline testing of containers such as in a carousel conveyor for, e.g., bottles, plastic bottles, etc.
In principle, it is also possible, after a predetermined test pressure is reached, to compare the electrical output signal of the sensor to this value or to several pre-entered values; this can be done on, e.g., a computer, where the sensor output is read in. The differential with respect to the set test pressure, i.e., the pressure drop, is determined by computer (compared to a boundary value entered into the computer or to a value that is determined from a reference leak).
This application is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 11/032,029 filed Jan. 11, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,013,712 issued Mar. 21, 2006, which is a divisional application of Ser. No. 10/688,990 filed Oct. 21, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,877,356 issued Apr. 12, 2005, which is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 10/246,693, filed Sep. 19, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,662,634 issued Dec. 16, 2003, which is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 09/750,691, filed Jan. 2, 2001, now abandoned, which is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 09/212,596, filed Dec. 16, 1998, and now abandoned, which is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 08/591,731, filed Jan. 25, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,915,270, issued Jun. 22, 1999, which in turn is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 08/232,055, filed Jun. 15, 1994, now abandoned, which in turn is a 371 of PCT/CH92/00173, filed Aug. 27, 1992.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2784373 | Lawrance et al. | Mar 1957 | A |
2804259 | Ralston | Aug 1957 | A |
3593584 | Dudick et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3683676 | Hass | Aug 1972 | A |
3728063 | Langecker | Apr 1973 | A |
3733488 | Chaud et al. | May 1973 | A |
3751973 | Strauss et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3800586 | Delatorre et al | Apr 1974 | A |
3818752 | Lindeberg | Jun 1974 | A |
3837215 | Massage | Sep 1974 | A |
3874226 | Weber | Apr 1975 | A |
3962905 | Jouve | Jun 1976 | A |
3987664 | Hass et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4170130 | Borror et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4204422 | Inoue et al. | May 1980 | A |
4223551 | Greve et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4383431 | Gelernt | May 1983 | A |
4459843 | Durham | Jul 1984 | A |
4542643 | Himmelstein | Sep 1985 | A |
4587619 | Converse, III et al. | May 1986 | A |
4640122 | Heraud et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4667506 | Jenkins et al. | May 1987 | A |
4670847 | Furuse | Jun 1987 | A |
4715214 | Tveter et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4837707 | Giometti et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4896530 | Lehmann | Jan 1990 | A |
4942758 | Cofield | Jul 1990 | A |
5029464 | Lehmann | Jul 1991 | A |
5065350 | Fedder | Nov 1991 | A |
5170660 | Lehann | Dec 1992 | A |
5235845 | Ito et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239859 | Lehmann | Aug 1993 | A |
5412978 | Boone et al. | May 1995 | A |
5760294 | Lehmann | Jun 1998 | A |
5847264 | Martin et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5915270 | Lehmann | Jun 1999 | A |
6720882 | Davey | Apr 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1031030 | May 1958 | DE |
0313678 | May 1989 | EP |
0432143 | Jun 1991 | EP |
0460511 | Dec 1991 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060112759 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11032029 | Jan 2005 | US |
Child | 11326381 | US | |
Parent | 10688990 | Oct 2003 | US |
Child | 11032029 | US | |
Parent | 10246693 | Sep 2002 | US |
Child | 10688990 | US | |
Parent | 09750691 | Jan 2001 | US |
Child | 10246693 | US | |
Parent | 09212596 | Dec 1998 | US |
Child | 09750691 | US | |
Parent | 08591731 | Jan 1996 | US |
Child | 09212596 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08232055 | US | |
Child | 08591731 | US |