This invention relates to a method for the automatic identification of a type of vehicle on a test stand. In this context, “type of vehicle” thereby also means the body of a vehicle, or a car body type for short.
The ability to specify nominal values and tolerances is an important requirement for the automatic servicing of a vehicle. These parameters include, for example, the specified tire pressure and the allowable tolerance. Automatic test stands such as those for tire pressure, for example, are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,396,817 or U.S. Pat. No. 5,445,020.
EP 1 327 872 A2 describes an apparatus for the determination of the internal pressure of a tire, in particular of vehicle tires, whereby this apparatus has a measurement unit, an electronic evaluation system and an optical-acoustic display unit. The invention teaches that the measurement unit is located on each vehicle track and has electro-mechanical means with a downstream signal converter. The internal tire pressure is thereby determined on the basis of the tire contact area by means of mathematical formulas, technical data on tire types and empirical values of physical characteristics, whereby these values are processed in a host computer. Using the formulas stored in the host computer, the tire contact area is calculated by means of the tire width and rolling surface and is then plotted graphically. The result is reliable information on the current internal tire pressure, although the information obtained is not the result of a precise and accurate measurement but only information that is sufficient to inform the vehicle driver of any overpressure, underpressure or normal pressure in the vehicle tires.
The object of the invention is therefore to make available a method for the automatic identification of a type of vehicle on a test stand so that the default settings for nominal values and tolerances can be made automatically.
The method of the invention for the automatic identification of a type of vehicle on a test stand has the following steps:
The characteristics to be determined can be, for example, the tire width and the tire tread, from which the type of tire can be identified. The type of vehicle can also be determined from the track width of each axle, the distance between axles, the axle load and the total weight of the vehicle. Characteristics to be determined can also include the rigidity values of the tire, which are the result of the strength of the sides of the tire, and the transverse forces (contact area effects), as well as tire pressure, tire load, load distribution over the axles etc.
Once the classification has been made, the nominal values and tolerances, which can be stored in a database for example, can be assigned to the variable operating values.
It is also advantageous if a verification is made whether a sensed or measured value lies within a specified range of nominal values or tolerance for the type of vehicle or the type of tire, and if the value lies outside the range of nominal values or tolerance an action is taken that brings the value into the range of nominal values or tolerance. A simple indication of the result of the verification is possible, e.g. yes/no, so that the decision on any action to be taken can be left to the user.
It is advantageous if each parameter is assigned a weighting which is taken into consideration in Step f) of the classification of the type of vehicle or type of tire.
It is also appropriate if an acceptance range is associated with each parameter, whereby the acceptance range is adapted for the parameters of each type of vehicle so that the classification in Step f) is clear and unambiguous.
The last two measures are particularly important if the method is required to “learn” or define a new type of vehicle. In this case, a still unknown type of vehicle is driven over the measurement instrument. The vehicle type data determined are then associated with the vehicle being newly tested. For this purpose, recurring verifications must be made whether a clear and unambiguous distinction between all types of vehicles can be made on the basis of the detailed data determined or whether collisions can occur. In the latter case, appropriate measures such as the reduction of the acceptance ranges or the introduction of new parameters must be considered.
The invention is described in greater detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The characteristics of the invention disclosed in the above description, in the accompanying drawing and in the claims can be considered essential for the realization of the invention both individually as well as in any desired combination.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10-2006 044 587 | Sep 2006 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2007/001624 | 9/12/2007 | WO | 00 | 11/17/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/034410 | 3/27/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4493103 | Yamashita et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
5260520 | Muhs et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5396817 | Rosensweig | Mar 1995 | A |
5445020 | Rosensweig | Aug 1995 | A |
5446291 | Becker et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5574226 | Reuther et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5753810 | Bass | May 1998 | A |
5962779 | Bass | Oct 1999 | A |
6894233 | Dingwall et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6925377 | Peters | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7942048 | Pingel et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20100058852 | Pingel et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100204869 | Hall et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 327 872 | Jul 2003 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100058849 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |