The present invention concerns a method for calculating the boundary layer level between fluids, in particular the boundary layer level between oil and water in connection with the use of a segment-based boundary layer meter.
In many different contexts, such as a separator in a process system or production installation for oil and gas, in which water is an undesired component, it may be desirable to determine the level of the respective fluids (oil, water and gas) in the separator. The purpose of such a measurement may, for example, be to control the level in the separator. To achieve good level control, the level measurement must be “robust” and consistent. For level measurement of the water level in separators, however, this may be a challenge on account of an emulsion of oil and water.
In connection with the measurement of the level of fluids, it is possible to use a so-called profile meter that is designed to detect the boundary between the various phases (each fluid or the mixture of fluids). The profile meter consists of a large number of segments arranged in a vertical row above/below each other. Each segment is designed to detect a state or property in connection with the fluid to be detected, and emits a signal to a registration/calculation unit. Such meters may, for example, be based on inductive measurement, capacitive measurement or radioactive sources.
For most prior art profile meters, it is difficult to detect changes in density for the respective fluid(s) or fluid mixture(s), which means that the measurements may contain a lot of “noise”. Furthermore, the measurements are not very continuous, as a standard algorithm used for the prior art solutions selects the “correct” segment for the phase change, based on the use of the registrations from 2 segments, for the level calculation by means of linear interpolation.
The present invention concerns a method for calculating the level or boundary layer between the different phases in a fluid based on the use of signals from several segments, thus producing much more reliable, more consistent calculations over time.
The present invention is characterized by the features described below.
The present invention will be described in further detail in the following by means of examples and with reference to the figures, wherein:
As stated above, level control requires robust, continuous measurement with minimum noise. This can be achieved using measurement signals from several segments in a profile meter.
A selection of these segments in the relevant area, for example for the water level, is selected.
In order for the calculation to be correct, there may be no more than two components, oil and water (or a mixture of these components, an emulsion). This means that the correct measurement is not achieved if gas is registered in the highest segments and/or sand in the lowest segments. This problem can be avoided by defining “legal” values for the density of the segments. For instance, it is possible to set the following:
If density<oil (i.e. gas)→density=density of oil.
If density>water (i.e. sand)→density=density of water.
Density “corrected for gas and sand” is then:
{circumflex over (ρ)}n=max(min(ρn;ρv);ρo) (1)
Mean density is then calculated as follows:
and the boundary layer level is calculated as follows:
Where:
L Calculated water level
Lu Upper water range area (*)
Ll Lower water range area (*)
ρn Density of segment no. n from the profile meter
{circumflex over (ρ)}n Corrected density for segment no. n
ρv Mean density of water from the profile meter
ρo Mean density of oil from the profile meter
N Total number of segments included
The method in accordance with the present invention may easily be implemented in a suitable computer program and adapted to the registration equipment for the relevant segment profile meter in each individual measurement situation. The implementation may also easily take place directly in the automation system if the value of relevant segments is or can be made available. These ranges indicated by * are defined within the segments on the profile meter.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20063815 | Aug 2006 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2007/000302 | 8/27/2007 | WO | 00 | 5/18/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/026934 | 3/6/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3721121 | Fierfort | Mar 1973 | A |
4471656 | Sanders et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
6104033 | Graeme | Aug 2000 | A |
6345683 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6548814 | Gronli | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6633625 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 060 630 | Sep 1982 | EP |
2 326 232 | Dec 1998 | GB |
2 188 396 | Aug 2002 | RU |
9917085 | Apr 1999 | WO |
03012379 | Feb 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100186498 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |