Patent Grant
7229527
The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for treating pulp. Preferably the method and apparatus according to the invention are applicable for thickening fiber suspensions of the wood processing industry. The method and apparatus according to the invention are especially preferably suited for applications where liquid is to be removed from fiber suspensions with a relatively low energy consumption, whereby the most obvious applications are pre-thickeners or the like used in connection with various known filters. However, the thickener13according to the invention may in some applications be utilized as the actual filter, by means of which consistencies in the range of up to 15 % may be obtained.
Traditionally, fiber suspensions have been screened at a consistency of about 1-2% in connection with chemical and other pulping. Fiber suspensions, i.e. pulp, are easily screened at this consistency, the result being a good purity level of the pulp. After screening the pulp has been thickened normally with suction drum or disc filters to a consistency of about 8-16%. This technology is as such quite serviceable, but low screening consistency increases the costs of pumping and the suction drum and disc filters require a large building volume.
With new technology, screening departments have been introduced in which a screening department feed pump creates a pressure difference, by means of which the pulp is conveyed through the screens and further by means of super-atmospheric pressure in the screens into a closed hydraulic filter. Said technology is described in patent application EP-A-0390403. The advantage of the process described in said publication is that expensive, space-consuming suction drum and disc filters are not needed. A disadvantage of the of the described process is that the screening consistency has had to be raised to a range of 3-5%, which in its turn has caused problems in running and sometimes also pulp impurity problems. The operation of closed hydraulic filters has required a feed consistency of at least 3-5%, which has restricted the possibilities of choosing the screening consistency freely.
An objective of the present invention is to enable the building and running of screening departments so that the consistency in the screening department is arranged to be optimal in view of screening, whereby the consistency of the actual screening is lower than the feeding consistency of the filter whereto the pulp is finally fed. This invention enables the screening to be carried out at a low consistency and still use new efficient closed hydraulic filters. The typical screening consistencies are 2-4% and the typical feeding consistencies of the filter are 3-6%. Thus, the difference in consistency between screening and filter feed is typically 1-3%, mostly 1-2%. Further, it is to be noted that sometimes e.g. the discharge consistency of a process tower and/or apparatus etc. adjacent to it limit the consistency to be too low in view of the subsequent process stage, whereby it is necessary to raise the consistency of the pulp to be appropriate for the subsequent process stage.
The consistency difference between screening and filtering is created using a pre-thickener as shown in
Hydraulic thickeners suitable for increasing the consistency of pulp have been presented earlier. Patent application EP-A-0 298 499 discloses one thickener solution, by means of which the consistency of fiber suspension may be raised from the feeding consistency of 0.3-1.0% to a range of 1.0-5.0% or from the feeding consistency of 3-10% to a range of 10-25%. Thus, it is quite an efficient thickener capable of producing major changes in consistency. This apparatus is, however, too expensive and its operating costs, mainly the energy consumption, make it in practice unpractical e.g. for the present purpose.
Literature discloses simple thickeners consisting of only a perforated tube in which the pulp flows. Such thickeners have been described e.g. in patent publications EP-B-0274690 and SE-C-227590. However, practice has shown that devices as simple as these are not suited for industrial use. Their problem is that although they do operate temporarily, their filter surfaces tend to get clogged periodically and their re-opening or keeping them clean tends to be unsuccessful if they do not have a rotor of some kind. Thus, in connection with the present invention, it has been decided to use an apparatus of another kind, in spite of the fact that, at its lowest, the demand for consistency increase is in the order of one percentage unit, even though in some special circumstances the apparatus may be used to raise the consistency as much as near to 10%. Usually in that case, however, the situation is that the initial consistency of the pulp is already at a relatively high level, at about between 7-10 per cent. To put it more exactly, the apparatus is at its best when the aim is to raise the consistency of the pulp in the apparatus about two-fold. However, it is naturally possible to reach other kinds of changes in the consistency by adjusting the operation of the apparatus. In the present case, the tendency of the filtering surface to get clogged is increased by pressure pulses occurring both in the screening department and its devices, which tend to force fibers into the slots of the filter surface, which in its turn results in the clogging of the filter surface, if a filter surface cleaning means is not used.
Prior art knows also an apparatus according to U.S. patent publication 4,085,050, functioning as a continuously operating filter, which apparatus comprises a vertically arranged cylindrical filter surface, a filtrate chamber arranged outside the filter surface, a centrally open screw thread arranged inside the filter surface and a feed conduit for the material to be filtered and a discharge conduit for the thickened material arranged at the upper and lower ends of the filter surface respectively. The apparatus functions so that a so-called precoat acting as the actual filtering material forms or alternatively is formed on the filter surface. As the material to be filtered is precipitated on this precoat, the screw thread wipes the precipitated layer off letting new material to be precipitated on the precoat layer. Said precoat layer is cleaned by feeding washing liquid through the shaft of the apparatus, which pressurized washing liquid cleans the precoat layer.
U.S. patent publication 4,464,253 describes an apparatus wherein the dry solids content is raised high and the consistent part is discharged via a cone. This kind of procedure is not possible with fiber suspension, because fiber suspension, being consistent, will not flow in a convergent cone. Said patent teaches that the pressure difference required in the filtering process is created by means of the feed pump of the apparatus alone or by means of said feed pump and a vacuum arranged in the filtrate compartments together. The apparatus of this patent is meant to be used so that the material to be filtered is fed into the upper end and the thickened material is discharged from the lower end of the apparatus. The apparatus comprises cylindrical and conical parts and is most obviously meant for high contents of residual dry matter.
Further, U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,128 deals with a similar kind of apparatus for raising the consistency to a range of 5-30 % from a low initial feeding consistency. In this case it is an apparatus, which is specially meant for removing liquid from fiber suspensions of the pulp industry, but the goal is a high increase in consistency and a high final consistency. A characteristic feature of the apparatus is that the screw is closed, i.e. the screw thread is fastened directly to a cylindrical or conical shaft core. The apparatus is further characterized in that the screw thread is arranged so close to the filter surface that it keeps the filter surface clean. In other words, the apparatus functions without a precoat layer. It is our conception, however, that the apparatus cannot function in the way described in the publication, but when pursuing high consistencies, the screw of the apparatus has to be used like a press.
U.S. patent publication 4,582,568 deals with yet another apparatus used in order to thicken fiber suspension by means of a screw press. However, a characteristic feature of this apparatus, unlike a few above-mentioned devices, is that the pressure difference required for the thickening is generated by the screw of the apparatus itself. Said patent publication deals with a combination of a thickener and a screw press, the thickener being meant for raising the consistency of the fiber suspension to correspond to the feeding consistency of the screw press. The function of the thickener is carried out by an apparatus provided with a closed screw surrounded in a small clearance with a filter surface. The fiber suspension is fed into the inlet end of the screw, wherefrom the screw further pushes the suspension against a hydrostatic pressure created by an upward directed discharge conduit arranged at the discharge end of the screw. A problem of the screw thickener described in said patent is that the screw is closed, whereby, as the apparatus stops, the flow of fiber suspension through the apparatus will also stop completely. Another problem is that the operational efficiency of the filter surface is relatively low, because the filter surface functions actively only in the vicinity of the inlet end. This is due to the characteristic feature of the closed screw that it feeds the pulp inside it as an essentially plug-like flow, whereby only the pulp layer facing the filter surface is efficiently thickened, the rest of the pulp passing nearer to the shaft of the screw without being essentially thickened. Liquid is filtrated to the filter surface only through a thickened pulp cake formed on the filter surface and the thickening rate is slow. This results in a highly limited capacity of the device, and raising the capacity is not easy, either, because the problem of the closed screw can only be eliminated by increasing the dimensions of the device.
The prior art apparatuses described above have some disadvantages of which at least the following are worth mentioning:
The apparatus for treating pulp according to the present invention eliminates e.g. said problems of prior art devices. Characteristic features of the apparatus according to the invention are, e.g., that
Other characteristic features of the method and apparatus according to the invention are disclosed in the appended patent claims.
In the following, the method and apparatus for treating pulp according to the invention are explained in more detail with reference to the appended figures, of which
on the shaft 30 so that the thread, according to a preferred embodiment, is positioned centrally inside the filter surface 22 and extends essentially throughout the whole length of the filter surface. In some cases, there may be several screw threads arranged inside each other. The screw thread 32 according to the invention is characterized in that it is positioned via tie rods at a distance from its shaft 30. Valves 40 and 46 are arranged in connection with both the outlet conduit 20 for the thickened pulp and the outlet conduit 26 for the filtrate in order to regulate the functioning of the apparatus.
One reason for arranging the screw to be open is an essential increase in the security of operation of the apparatus. In case of breakdown, the fiber suspension flowing into the apparatus may flow through the hollow center from the inlet opening to the discharge essentially undisturbed. The only disadvantage for the process in that case is that the consistency of the fiber suspension does not decrease in the desired way anymore, but remains essentially the same as the consistency of the pulp being fed into the apparatus. Another reason for arranging the apparatus to be open is that by means of an open screw it is easier to control the formation mechanism of thickened fiber mat than by means of a closed. screw. In a closed screw, in certain circumstances, the fiber suspension having a flow speed above the feeding speed of the screw revolves in a spiral trace along the screw thread of the apparatus, whereby said flow essentially disturbs the formation of the mat. In an open screw, fiber suspension at a low consistency may flow through the open center of the apparatus without disturbing the mat formation. Another remarkable advantage of the open screw may be seen in connection with the actual thickening process. When starting to feed pulp into the apparatus according to the invention, the pulp fills the whole apparatus uniformly. The pulp closest to the filter surface is thickened onto the filter surface, wherefrom the rotating screw thread pushes the pulp further towards the discharge of the apparatus. Friction force between the filter surface and the pulp causes the pulp layer on the filter surface to compress in the axial direction of the apparatus, whereby open filter surface is left behind the screw at the whole length of the screw thread, onto which filter surface fresh fiber suspension is fed. As this thickens, the process described above recurs and new pulp is again delivered to the filter surface.
A so-called scrap trap (not shown) may be arranged at the feeding end of the pre-thickener apparatus 10. In its simplest form, the scrap trap may be a tangential conduit arranged at the end of the apparatus, through which conduit heavy particles collected into the apparatus may be discharged continuously or periodically. The conduit may e.g. be provided with means known per se in order to separate and remove scrap from the apparatus, if desired.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the inner surface of the filter member used in the apparatus is grooved essentially in the axial direction of the apparatus in order to make the thickened fiber mat collected onto to the filter surface to slide along the grooves directly to the discharge of the apparatus. This ensures that the fiber mat cannot cling to the screw and revolve together with it. Naturally, it is also possible to use other guiding means arranged essentially in the axial direction, such as e.g. ledges attached to the filter surface or the like. If the fiber mat would revolve with the screw, the latter would not push the thickened fiber layer to the discharge of the apparatus, but material going to the discharge would be practically non-thickened pulp only.
The apparatus 10 illustrated in
The apparatus according to the invention utilizes a filter surface 22, preferably perforated, the diameter of the holes being 0.1-3 mm, preferably 1.0-2.0 mm, greatly depending on the actual application object of the apparatus. The openings of the filter surface may also be slots, the width of which is a little smaller than the hole diameter of a perforated filter member used for a similar purpose. In addition to that, it has been noticed that in some applications it is preferable to use at the inlet end of the apparatus, i.e. in the vicinity of the end through which the pulp is fed into the apparatus, filter openings smaller than elsewhere in the apparatus, which prevent low-consistency fibers from getting into the filtrate.
A pressure difference less than 1.0 bar, preferably less than 0.5 bar, most preferably about 0.3 bar, is maintained over the filter surface. Bigger pressure differences result in higher risk of clogging of the filter surface, as high pressure tends to press the fibers into the openings of the filter surface. The desired pressure difference may be adjusted e.g. so that when the pressure inside the apparatus 10 is 1-5 bar, the outlet flow of the filtrate is throttled by the valve so that the desired pressure difference over the filter surface 22 is obtained. The pressure difference between the filtrate chamber 24 and the inner space of the apparatus is critical in view of the functioning of the apparatus, that is, for the filter surface 22 staying open. Said pressure difference may be considered as one control parameter for the operation of the apparatus. To put it differently, the attempt is to keep the pressure difference constant during the whole thickening process.
The filter surface 22 is aided to keep open, as mentioned earlier, by means of a shaft 30 having both of its ends mounted on bearings 28 to the end plates 14 and 16 of the apparatus and at least one screw thread 32 fixed to the shaft 30. However, in some applications a construction mounted on bearings at the drive end only may be used. The thread/s 32 of the screw is/are arranged at such a distance from the filter surface 22 that the thread/s wipe/s away the thickened pulp from the filter surface and lead/s the thickened material to the discharge without letting the thickened pulp to rotate with the screw. An appropriate distance is under 5 mm, preferably under 3 mm and suitably 0.2-2 mm from the filter surface. In other words, the screw rotates so that it prevents the formation of a permanent pulp layer, a so-called precoat, on the filter surface 22.
The width of the screw thread is also essential for the optimal operation of the apparatus, which width is to be determined individually for every application, because it is naturally effected by both the production and thickening demands set for the apparatus.
The number of screw threads 32 (except for one thread, there may be two or more threads inside each other) and their pitch as well the rotational speed of the screw are selected so that the desired optimal mat formation, i.e. thickening is obtained for each type of pulp. Practice has shown that when using the apparatus used in our tests, the residence time of the fiber suspension in the apparatus should be less than five seconds, because after that no significant thickening occurred with the apparatus used in our tests. It is possible, however, to achieve even longer residence times by significantly modifying the apparatus used in the test. In that case, the constructional characteristics and/or the rotational speed of the screw are selected so that the feeding speed created by the screw (to put it more exactly, the lift speed, if the apparatus is vertical) is less than 3 m/s, preferably between 0.2-1.0 m/s and most preferably about 0.5 m/s. Nevertheless, this is not the actual pulp feed, because the screw does not feed the pulp totally through the apparatus, but only pushes the part of pulp thickened onto the filter surface to the discharge opening of the apparatus. Factors limiting said feeding speed are, e.g., the filtrating speed of the liquid off the fiber suspension and the generation of turbulence between the fiber mat and the filter surface.
In an apparatus according to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the rotational speed of the screw and the pitch were selected so that with the desired thickening range and output, the flow speeds of both the pulp cake fed by the screw to the discharge end and the non-thickened part of the pulp flown thereto through the center of the apparatus were at the discharge end essentially the same. In other words, in said apparatus and said case, the flow speed of the fiber suspension fed into the apparatus was at the inlet end higher than the feeding speed of the screw. Said difference in speed was further compensated as the liquid was filtered from the fiber suspension through the filter surface.
The filtrate being removed from the apparatus may preferably be used for dilution in some other process stage. Especially preferably the filtrate is suited for dilution in the same process stage, i.e. the screening stage. In other words, the filtrate may be led for dilution either to the knotter, or the discharge tank for bottom dilution. Characteristically, the apparatus according to the invention is not used in attempt of minimizing the fiber content of the filtrate, but the main goal is to maximize the efficiency and service reliability of thickening. Accordingly, the fiber content of the filtrate according to our tests is over 100 mg/l, mostly even in the order of 1000 mg/l. Nevertheless, this has no practical significance when the filtrate is returned to a preceding process stage. The fibers may be removed from the filtrate, if so desired, with a separate fiber separator.
It was already mentioned that regulating the thickness of the pulp received from the apparatus is simple. Due to great feeding consistency demands of washers, that is, because the consistency of the pulp in the washer feed must stay practically constant, also the discharge consistency of the pre-thickener according to the present invention must be kept almost constant, exactly at a level corresponding to the consistency demands of the washer subsequent in the process.
That is why the pre-thickener according to the invention is controlled e.g. by measuring various flows, so that the discharge consistency remains within predetermined limits. One way to do this is that when taking each pre-thickener into operation, the flow amount of incoming pulp is measured as well as the amount of filtrate leaving the pre-thickener and the desired discharge consistency is obtained by changing the amount of filtrate. Having thus adjusted the discharge consistency to be correct, the pre-thickener is further controlled so that the ratio of the incoming flow and the filtrate flow remains constant, whereby the discharge consistency is also constant. Assuming that the consistency of pulp coming from the screening department does not change.
In case it is suspected that the consistency might vary, it is possible to provide the system with a device for measuring the consistency of incoming pulp, by means of which device e.g. the filtrate valve is further controlled. As an example of a controlling method taking into account the consistency of incoming pulp, a ratio adjustment may be mentioned, according to which the consistency of the pulp may be effected by changing the ratio of the thickened material and the filtrate. In one application this kind of system gets additional information e.g. from the consistency regulation of the knotters. The consistency control of the knotters may for example inform that it was not capable of adjusting the consistency of the pulp, and the pulp leaving the knotters towards the pre-thickener is too dilute. In that case, by means of ratio adjustment, it is possible to change the ratio of the thickened material and the filtrate and remove more filtrate, whereby the consistency of the pulp leaving the pre-thickener remains unchanged.
Another possible controlling method is e.g. an adjustment based on the power consumption of the drive motor. This controlling method is based on the fact that according to the tests we carried out, an increase in the consistency of the pulp results in an increase in the power requirement of the drive motor of the apparatus. Thus, e.g. in case of increased power requirement, it is possible to decrease the filtrate flow by e.g. throttling the filtrate valve, which results in the initial consistency. And accordingly, in case of decreased power requirement, the filtrate discharge may be intensified by opening the filtrate valve.
As one embodiment based on measuring the power input or torque of the drive motor, controlling the thickening on the base of rotational speed regulation may be considered. On the other hand, it is previously known, as stated above, that increased discharge consistency of the apparatus results in an increased power input. The consistency may, of course, be determined directly from the pulp discharging from the apparatus. Again, on the other hand, our tests have also shown that a change in the rotational speed of the screw is directly proportional to the change in the consistency, because the faster the thread moves (the higher the rotational speed), the thinner the fiber mat on the filter surface is and the better it filtrates liquids, whereby more liquid is released into the filtrate in a unit of time. On the basis of the aforesaid it is possible to aim at decreasing the rotational speed of the thread as the discharge consistency of the pulp increases, which results in a decreased power requirement of the apparatus and, at the same time, a thicker fiber mat is formed on the filter surface decelerating the filtration of liquid from the fiber suspension. Accordingly, in case of decreased discharge consistency of the pulp it would be possible to increase the rotational speed of the screw. It is, naturally, obvious that in practice the rotational speed of the thread has some threshold limits, above or under which it is no more possible to obtain thickening results applicable for industrial purposes.
A further controlling method is pressure difference adjustment based on the fact that with a constant pressure difference the consistency remains constant. By standardizing the feed-in flow of the apparatus and the pressure difference prevailing over the filter surface, the amount of filtrate discharging from the apparatus is directly proportional to the feed-in consistency. In other words, as the feed-in consistency decreases due to more liquid filtrating from dilute pulp than from pulp of higher consistency, more liquid is filtrated from the pulp, whereby a change in the feeding consistency does not effect the discharge consistency, at least not to such a great extent. Accordingly, as the feeding consistency increases, a constant pressure difference allows for a smaller filtrate flow, which also compensates for fluctuations in the feeding consistency.
All said controlling methods as well as other corresponding methods may be utilized either separately or as a combination of several methods. Utilizing state-of-art adjustment and controlling technique with multivariable adjustment and neural networks it is possible to reach a reliable and exact thickening control with adjustment methods mentioned above. According to our tests, the accuracy of the thickener is in the order of +/−3% of the numerical thickness value. In other words, with the thickness of 10 per cent, the error margin is +/−0.3%.
As noticed from the above, a solution has been developed which is essentially simpler and/or at least operationally more secure than prior art pre-thickener solutions, the service reliability and dependability of the solution being of quite a different order compared to prior art apparatus.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 982043 | Sep 1998 | FI | national |
| 982565 | Nov 1998 | FI | national |
This application is a division of application Ser. No. 09/787,629, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,767,432, filed Mar. 21, 2001, which in turn was the US national phase of international application PCT/FI99/00778 filed Sep. 22, 1999, which designated the U.S., the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in this application.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3076610 | Rosenfeld et al. | Feb 1963 | A |
| 3682444 | Reinhall | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3833465 | Campbell | Sep 1974 | A |
| 4085050 | Gervasi | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4582568 | Iyengar | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4632729 | Laakso | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4954221 | Reinhall et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 5034128 | Hillström | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5147504 | Henricson et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5863389 | White et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040084160 A1 | May 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09787629 | US | |
| Child | 10689665 | US |
