The invention relates to a method for the cylindrical grinding of a one-piece workpiece, the contour of which is defined by a continuous longitudinal axis and, in addition to a first longitudinal region, which is cylindrical with respect to said longitudinal axis, also has a second longitudinal region, in which the radial distribution of mass in relation to the longitudinal axis is non-uniform.
Workpieces of this kind are known. They are contoured in accordance with a continuous longitudinal axis, this longitudinal axis simultaneously being a center line and an axis of rotation during subsequent operation. However, only some of them have one or more longitudinal portions of cylindrical cross section which are rotationally symmetrical in relation to the longitudinal axis. In another longitudinal region, the radial distribution of mass is non-uniform because the radial circumferential contour is eccentric or not rotationally symmetrical in some other way with respect to the longitudinal axis. The best-known example of such workpieces are the balancer shafts in modern engines, especially those for motor vehicles. The increasing use of such balancer shafts is the product of the mutually contradictory demands for smoothness from these engines, for low fuel consumption data and for lightweight construction in general. However, the use of balancer shafts is not restricted only to motor vehicle engines but also extends to compressors and other technical areas.
In the specialist jargon of those in the industry, such workpieces are referred to as “unbalanced”. This means that a workpiece of this kind rotating alone is associated with problems of unbalance since the rotary motion is non-uniform and is disturbed by vibrations or wobbling movements. With the increasing use of balancer shafts and similar workpieces, there arose the demand for high-precision grinding of said workpieces, at least in the cylindrical and rotationally symmetrical longitudinal regions thereof, in an economical production process, despite the unbalance behavior thereof.
There have already been various reflections on how this demand could be met with the known means of grinding technology. The knowledge of the applicant on the subject is made up of its own operational practice, from analyses of in-house tests and from discussions among professionals of the kind which customarily take place at specialist conferences, exhibitions and similar occasions. There is no known documentation or publication relating thereto, however.
Thus, consideration was given to producing said workpieces selectively with a considerable allowance in the second longitudinal region thereof in such a way that an approximation to rotational symmetry and hence smooth concentric running would be expected. After grinding, the excess allowance would have had to be removed. However, such a grinding method would be not only very involved and expensive but would also entail a reduction in quality. This is because removal of material by turning or milling after grinding, the latter being a fine machining process, would lead to distortion of the workpiece, making it impossible to comply with the required dimensional and shape tolerances.
The idea of grinding these difficult workpieces by mounting between centers had to be abandoned. It would be expected that grinding said workpieces between centers would be possible only with considerable outlay owing to their instability and the workpiece geometry. For example, an axial contact pressure of the kind which generally arises when grinding between centers would have led to deformation precisely of the weak, eccentric second longitudinal region.
Finally, the tried and tested method for centerless cylindrical grinding was also considered. In this case, however, the experience hitherto has been almost exclusively with completely rotationally symmetrical workpieces. It was therefore known that a relatively severe unbalance of the workpieces made this grinding process very difficult or even impracticable. During centerless cylindrical grinding, an “unbalanced” workpiece will rotate nonuniformly, that is to say will not allow a uniform rotary motion to take place. This means, first of all, an inaccurate grinding result. It was even necessary to accept that the nonuniform rotary motion would even hinder the driving of the workpiece by the regulating wheel, not even allowing the rotary driving of the workpiece to come about. As is known, conditions in the grinding gap are so difficult that the regulating wheel can only transmit a sufficient torque to the workpiece if the latter is by and large also rotationally symmetrical with respect to the distribution of mass. However, if the drive is not reliable for the process from the outset, centerless cylindrical grinding cannot even be considered for these workpieces.
It is therefore the underlying object of the invention to provide a method for cylindrical grinding by means of which the cylindrical and rotationally symmetrical first longitudinal region of said “unbalanced” workpieces can be ground with high accuracy in a manner suitable for economical mass production.
This object is achieved by a method in which a balancing mass is first of all attached to said workpiece and then the cylindrical first longitudinal region is ground by centerless cylindrical grinding, at least in a first longitudinal portion.
The method according to the invention has the advantage that the conventional and known machines for centerless cylindrical grinding can be used, cf. in this connection, for example, Dubbel, Taschenbuch für den Maschinenbau [Mechanical Engineering Handbook], 18th edition, pages T89/T90. In the present case, centerless cylindrical grinding is also of advantage because, for example, the balancer shafts mentioned can be produced in large numbers and are already in the form of forged or cast blanks and of very uniform quality after machining. Hence, the unbalance of the individual balancer shafts is therefore also within a relatively narrow range. It is thus possible with just a single type of balancing weight to achieve an economical process which allows a high degree of automation.
If the individual workpieces differ to a relatively great extent from one another, it is also possible to measure the residual unbalance thereof before grinding and to mount different balancing masses on the workpieces depending on requirements. In this way, the quality of the grinding process can be optimized even further. In general, the balancing masses are attached releasably to the workpieces. However, they do not have to be removed again immediately on completion of cylindrical grinding but can also be of advantage for additional production processes. For example, an appropriately dimensioned and shaped balancing mass can also be used as a grip for an automatic production linkage device or an assembly process. Moreover, the balancing mass may be useful for stabilizing the workpiece in additional transfer and processing operations.
It is self-evident that complete balancing in the precise physical sense does not always occur in series production when using a single type of balancing mass. However, it is sufficient for practical purposes if the remaining unbalance is reduced to a very low level.
For ease of explanation, the following terminological definitions. The first or second “longitudinal region” is the sum of the individual first and second longitudinal portions on the workpiece. For example, the balancer shaft illustrated by way of example in
In a case where the balancing mass is suitable only for the grinding process itself, the balancing mass is attached to the workpiece releasably and is removed as soon as the first longitudinal region thereof has been ground to the extent necessary by centerless cylindrical grinding.
In many cases, it will be advantageous that the balancing mass be attached in the second longitudinal region of the workplace. The cylindrical portions of the first longitudinal region are then all free for cylindrical grinding.
Another advantageous embodiment relates to the case where the first and second longitudinal portions alternate with one another on the workpiece and where a second longitudinal portion is formed by a bridge portion which extends between two first longitudinal portions and at a radial distance from the longitudinal axis. In this case, there is the possibility of mounting the balancing mass in a balancing body, which has a recess extending radially with respect to the longitudinal axis thereof. By means of this recess, the balancing body is mounted on the bridge portion and secured in the mounted position.
The means of securing the balancing weight can consist in a spring-loaded pressure pin but can also be formed by one or more screwed joints, by spring action latching members, a device for snap-on mounting, a magnetic joint or a multi-part embodiment of the balancing weight in which laterally applied clamping rings hold the individual parts together in the mounted state.
If two or more rotationally symmetrical first longitudinal portions are to be ground on the workpiece to be ground, grinding can be performed with a centerless cylindrical grinding machine which has a dedicated grinding set for each individual longitudinal portion, said set comprising a regulating wheel, a grinding wheel and a support rail. In this way, all the first longitudinal portions can be ground simultaneously.
For the combination of a particular workpiece of the type under discussion here with its associated balancing mass, there are a large number of different ways of assembling the balancing mass in the form of an appropriate balancing body with the workpiece, at least for the duration of the grinding process. Since this assembled subassembly is then fed to the grinding machine, the unit comprising the workpiece and the balancing body is referred to as a system, which is adapted to the nature of the workpiece and the particular grinding task. This system forms an important subassembly which passes as a joint unit at least through the grinding machine and, in many cases can also remain as such at subsequent stages.
An advantageous characteristic of this system can consist in that the balancing body is mounted releasably on the workpiece.
It is furthermore an advantageous characteristic of the system if the workpiece and the balancing body are assembled by means of a recess extending radially in the balancing body, wherein the balancing body is mounted by means of the recess on an eccentrically arranged longitudinal web of the workpiece.
If the preconditions for an automated method of working are met, a dedicated apparatus for cylindrical grinding of the system may be effected. This expresses the fact that the system can be machined as a whole in the centerless cylindrical grinding machine. In this case, one specific adaptation can consist in that there must be sufficient space for the rotation of the balancing weight.
In simple cases and at low production numbers, the balancing weight will be mounted individually and by had on the workpiece. If, however, the preconditions for mass production are met, it makes more sense for the assembly and, if appropriate, disassembly of the system to be performed automatically within the apparatus or in direct functional association therewith. In this way, a combined processing station can be effected, to which the workpieces are brought in a preprocessed state on a conveyor belt and are transferred from the conveyor belt into an assembly station and, from there, transferred again to the machine for centerless cylindrical grinding by loading gantries. The fully ground workpieces are also transferred back to the conveyor belt by loading gantries, and a station for removal of the balancing weights may also be provided, if appropriate.
The invention is explained in greater detail below in the illustrative embodiments with reference to drawings.
According to the definitions hereinabove, the first longitudinal portions 2a, 2b, 2c together form the rotationally symmetrical first longitudinal region of the workpiece, while the second longitudinal portion 3 forms the second longitudinal region. In the latter, the radial distribution of mass in relation to the longitudinal axis 5 is nonuniform, giving rise to unbalance in the case of rotation.
By means of its recess 7, the balancing body 6 is mounted in the mounting direction 9 on the second longitudinal portion 3, which is designed as a flat longitudinal web and has the basic shape of a rounded rectangle. The narrow side of the recess 7 forms an abutment shoulder 10, against which the balancing body 6 abuts and is secured in this position by the pressure pin 11. It is readily apparent from
Together with the balancing body 6, the workpiece 1 forms a common subassembly or system which, as a whole, has a balanced distribution of mass in the radial direction. The system is thus radially balanced in the conventional sense when it rotates about the continuous longitudinal axis 5.
It should furthermore be noted that the figures for the illustrative embodiment are intended merely to illustrate the principle of the invention. Thus, for example, the balancing body 6 need not necessarily have the shape of a circular disk; a roller shape, an elliptical cross-sectional shape or some other shape may also be expedient. The figures primarily illustrate a centerless cylindrical grinding process based on the principle of perpendicular plunge-cut grinding. However, the invention is not restricted thereto, it is likewise possible to consider the other methods for centerless cylindrical grinding, such as longitudinal or throughfeed grinding or plunge-cut angle grinding.
The securing of the balancing weight 6 by a spring-loaded pressure pin 11 as illustrated in
The balancing body 6 can be mounted manually on the second longitudinal portion 3a, in which case a fork-type pulling tool 14 (
According to
The invention brings the advantage that the customary and existing machines for centerless cylindrical grinding can be used unmodified. If, namely, the balancing weight 6 is correctly dimensioned and arranged, the workpiece 1 will rotate smoothly and concentrically in the machine, making it possible to achieve a good grinding result without further ado.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2010 036 065 | Sep 2010 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/064879 | 8/30/2011 | WO | 00 | 3/18/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/028604 | 3/8/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3358310 | Wrobbel | Dec 1967 | A |
4578906 | Appleton | Apr 1986 | A |
7258594 | Junker | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20040248502 | Junker | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201283519 | Aug 2009 | CN |
2 206 299 | Jan 1989 | GB |
56-56373 | May 1981 | JP |
9-314447 | Dec 1997 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130210322 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |