Information
-
Patent Application
-
20020197280
-
Publication Number
20020197280
-
Date Filed
May 01, 200222 years ago
-
Date Published
December 26, 200221 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
-
International Classifications
- A61K039/085
- G01N033/554
- G01N033/569
- C07H003/00
Abstract
A method for the laboratory determination of prosthetic infections is described. This method, performed on biological fluids isolated from patients, is based on the detection of antibodies specific for the polysaccharides produced by bacteria colonizing prosthetic devices.
Description
[0001] The present invention refers to a method for the determination of prosthetic infections in which at least one Staphylococcus strain is involved. The method is based on the detection of antibodies reacting with a slime polysaccharide produced by virulent staphylococcal strains, from blood samples or other biological fluid samples.
[0002] The invention also provides a process for preparing a polysaccharide to use in the above method, starting from cultures of virulent staphylococcal strains, as well as the polysaccharide itself which is obtained by the cited process.
[0003] Prosthetic infections represent a severe problem in general surgery, cardiovascular surgery, orthopedics, ophtalmology and odontology, all sectors in which the introduction of biomaterials has become routinary. Prosthetic devices are also widely used in oncology for artificial nutrition and chemotherapy.
[0004] The most significant aspects of prosthetic infections are the following:
[0005] their incidence is generally reported to be 2 to 6% of the cases, following the first introduction of the biomaterial;
[0006] when a biomaterial is substituted by a new one, as a consequence of an infection, the incidence of re-infections is about 60%;
[0007] infections may cause functional loss of organs or their parts or even death of the patient in 25 to 45% of the cases, although in some particular cases, as for cardiac surgery, mortality is much higher and in some fields of medicine, as for example odontology, no mortality is usually associated with prosthetic infections;
[0008] hospitalization of patients is frequently very long and expensive;
[0009] diagnosis of these infections is difficult for the almost complete absence of specific clinical signs;
[0010] the greatest part of these infections (over 85%) is caused by coagulase negative staphylococci (and to a lesser extent by coagulase positive staphylococci), although other microorganisms, as enteric bacteria, pseudomonads and enterococci, can also be isolated in various cases (frequently in association with at least one staphylococcal strain).
[0011] While causing these infections bacteria are strongly glued to the surface of biomaterials, forming colonies that evolve with time in biofilms that may almost entirely cover the surface of the biomaterial, biasing its tissue integration.
[0012] Following adhesion bacteria undergo important metabolic modifications, reducing their replicative rate, though maintaining a high biosynthetic activity. The main products of this activity are extracellular polysaccharides (generally indicated as slime) that form a thick and dense fibrous layer protecting bacterial cells from chemicals, radiations, phagocytes, and antibodies.
[0013] Slime-embedded bacteria, growing on biomaterials, when exposed to antibiotics, exhibit minimal inhibitory and minimal bactericidal concentrations that can be even hundreds of times higher than the corresponding values obtained when bacteria are grown in the absence of the biomaterial.
[0014] When a biofilm reaches a determined critical mass, it releases in the surrounding liquid environment little aggregates of bacterial cells that may move to colonize new surfaces of the biomaterial.
[0015] Prosthetic infections are frequently characterized by scarce and non specific clinical signs, that are most often confused with minor viral episodes, and that disappear following common antibiotic therapy to manifest again after some time. These episodes are generally due to the release of small bacterial aggregates from the biofilm, that while circulating in blood are easily recognized by the immune defenses of the host, causing fever, and that, being in the planktonic form, are easily killed by common antibiotics, thus mimicking the eradication of the infection. Clinical signs become evident in the advanced phases of the infection, with formation of large tumefactions of the soft tissues surrounding the graft, or fistulas, or evident signs of general compromission.
[0016] Due to this peculiar characteristics early diagnosis is extremely difficult, even as a consequence of the high incidence of false negatives following cultural microbiological analyses, depending on the fact that sessile bacteria are not able to rapidly adapt to in vitro cultural conditions.
[0017] Till now diagnosis of vascular graft infections has been based on the analysis of objective clinical parameters, blood parameters, and instrumental data obtained by ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy, and scintigraphy following injection with radio-labelled leukocytes. This way it is in most cases not possible to reveal the early phases of infection for the insufficient sensitivity or for the lack of well defined criteria of interpretation of data and images.
[0018] Overall the actual diagnostic possibilities are absolutely inadequate, particularly in the early phases of the disease that are more favourable for a successful therapy.
[0019] It has now been found, and this is the object of the present invention, a reliable and unexpensive method, that can be easily applied to serum samples or other biological fluids, able to reveal the presence of infections involving prosthetic devices even in the early phases of development. This method can be routinely performed for the constant monitoring of patients that were treated with the introduction of any kind of prosthetic device and are at risk for infection, especially caused by staphylococci.
[0020] This method consists in the quantitative determination of the presence of antibodies, specifically directed against extracellular polysaccharides, extracted from virulent strains of staphylococci.
[0021] Furthermore, the present invention provides a method for preparing and purifying these extracellular polysaccharides from adequately grown staphylococcal cells.
[0022] Staphylococcal strains that may be used for this method are both coagulase-negative and positive, either virulent ones or anyway able to produce slime. In particular, virulent Staphylococcus epidermidis or Staphylococcus aureus strains are preferred.
[0023] These strains can be obtained either directly from patients suffering from a prosthetic infection or from standard culture collections of reference strains. The characteristics of such a typical strain are reported in the following Example 1. Experiments were also indicative when performed using the Staphylococcus aureus strain deposited by the applicant at DSMZ No. 11942.
[0024] Bacteria are grown in the liquid medium described in Hussain et al., J. Med. Microbiol. 34:143-147, 1991 (HHW medium), with some modifications as reported in the following Example 2.
[0025] The procedure to prepare the polysaccharides according to the invention essentially involves the following steps:
[0026] a) culturing the staphylococcal strains in the modified HHW medium for a period of 4-6 days;
[0027] b) homogenizing the bacterial cells in a physiological buffer
[0028] c) centrifugating at 13,000× g for 15 minutes and separating the surnatant;
[0029] d) desalting by dyalisis the surnatant using membranes with a cut-off of 12 kDa;
[0030] e) freezing and lyophilizing the solution obtained in (d);
[0031] f) suspending the lyophilized material in a deproteinizing solution, for example tricloroacetic acid;
[0032] centrifugating at 30,000× g the solution obtained (f) and separating the surnatant with addition of ethanol;
[0033] h) centrifugating the surnatant of step (g) at 20,000× g to obtain the polysaccharide;
[0034] i) washing the precipitated polysaccharide with absolute ethanol, dehydrating in vacuo and suspending it in sterile H2O.
[0035] Quantification of the purified polysaccharide could for example be performed according to the method described by Pelkonen et al., Journal of Bacteriology 170, 2646, 1988.
[0036] The polysaccharide obtained according to the above described method is used in the assay for the determination of antibodies in serum or other biological fluids from patients having a prosthetic device inserted.
[0037] Preferably the assay determines the presence of antibodies of the class IgG and/or IgM, following conventional immunochemical procedures, as for example enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), gel immuno-precipitation, immuno-diffusion or counter-immuno-electrophoresis, radioimmunoassay, complement fixation, and passive haemoagglutination.
[0038] A solid phase method is preferred in which the polysaccharide is immobilized to a solid surface, as for example microtiter wells and then allowed to react with the sample, in conditions appropriate for the formation of the immune complex. Once the immune complex has formed it can be revealed by reaction with appropriate molecules, as for example antibodies or their immunocompetent fragments, labelled with radioactive isotopes, chemioluminescent or fluorogenic substances, or coupled to enzymes catalizing colorimetric reactions and other similar substances.
[0039] The efficiency of the method disclosed by the invention was confirmed by the following experiments.
[0040] In a first set of experiments sera from 15 patients with a vascular graft infection were analyzed. The presence of a prosthetic infection in these patients was confirmed by microbiological analyses of both samples taken from the periprotesic tissues and of the grafts themselves after their surgical substitution. At least one staphylococcal strain was isolated from each sample.
[0041] Of these fifteen patients 11 showed overt clinical signs of infection while 4 had only non specific clinical signs of infection but were positive at scintigraphy after injection of 99mTc-labelled leukocytes.
[0042] Sera from 10 adult, healthy subjects of both sex were used as negative controls.
[0043] Reactivity of the sera was assayed in an ELISA format, against:
[0044] a-monospecific biofilms formed by different staphylococcal strains (both clinical isolates and reference strains) formed on small polypropilene cylinders (0.5×1 mm);
[0045] b-polispecific biofilms formed by different staphylococcal strains (both clinical isolates and reference strains) formed on small polypropilene cylinders (0.5×1 mm);
[0046] c-surface proteins extracted from cultures of different staphylococcal strains.
[0047] d-the polysaccharides described in the present invention, extracted from cultures of Staphylococcus aureus DSM 11942 and of Staphylococcus epidermidis SA 1545 (see example 1 for characterization of this strain).
[0048] Experiments yielded the following results:
[0049] a-both IgG and IgM antibody titers against monospecific or polispecific staphylococcal biofilms or staphylococcal surface and secretory proteins were not significantly different in either infected and non infected patients;
[0050] b-both IgG and IgM antibody titers of against the staphylococcal polysaccharide of the invention were significantly different in infected and non infected patients; they moreover allowed to differentiate between overtly symptomatic infected patients and pauci-symptomatic, scintigraphy positive patients.
[0051] Table 1. Range, Mean and standard deviation of both IgG and IgM titers obtained in ELISA assays performed on serum samples of 11 patients with a symptomatic vascular graft infection, 4 patients with a pauci-symptomatic vascular graft infection but positive for scintigraphy after injection of 99mTC labelled leukocytes, and 10 healthy control subjects, using the polysaccharide extracted from cultures of S. aureus DSM 11942 to sensitize microtiter wells.
1TABLE 1
|
|
DSM 11942
PatientIgG 1/160IgG 1/160IgG 1/160IgM 1/160IgM 1/160IgM 1/160
Category (n.)RangeMeanSD*RangeMeanSD*
|
Infected0.262-1.06 0.660.25 0.32-1.0320.660.27
Symtomatic
(11)
Non Infected0.177-0.2660.170.030.101-0.1950.140.04
(10)
Infected pauci-0.251-0.4570.320.090.332-0.56 0.470.09
symptomatic
scintigraphy +
(4)
|
*Standard deviation
[0052] Table 2. Range, Mean and standard deviation of both IgG and IgM titers obtained in ELISA assays performed on serum samples of 11 patients with a symptomatic vascular graft infection, 4 patients with a pauci-symptomatic vascular graft infection but positive for scintigraphy after injection of 99mTC labelled leukocytes, and 10 healthy control subjects, using the polysaccharide extracted from cultures of S. epidermidis SA 1545 to sensitize microtiter wells.
2TABLE 2
|
|
SA 1545
PatientIgG 1/160IgG 1/160IgG 1/160IgM 1/160IgM 1/160IgM 1/160
Category (n.)RangeMeanSD*RangeMeanSD*
|
Infected0.173-0.9710.470.21 0.31-1.0710.560.2
symptomatic (11)
Non Infected 0.11-0.2650.150.050.126-0.2430.160.03
(10)
Infected pauci-0.202-0.4450.290.110.287-0.4830.370.06
symptomatic
scintigraphy + (4)
|
*Standard deviation
[0053] In a second set of experiments a larger number of sera was assayed to determine both IgG and IgM titers in ELISA tests performed using only the polysaccharide of the invention to sensitize microtiter wells. All throughout these experiments the polysaccharide extracted from strain SA1545 (described in example 1) was used.
[0054] A total of 97 sera were tested in these experiments. Of these 97 sera, 19 were obtained from control patients not infected and not carrying a vascular graft, 3 were obtained from control patients not infected but carrying a vascular graft, 5 were obtained from patients carrying a vascular graft infected by Gram-negative bacteria, 13 were obtained from patients not infected but carrying a vascular graft and with a previous history of vascular graft infection caused by Staphylococcus spp., and 57 were obtained from patients carrying a vascular graft infected by Staphylococcus Spp.
[0055] Both IgG and IgM titers were determined in all these sera using {fraction (1/160)} and {fraction (1/320)} dilutions of the sera; two sets of duplicate determinations were performed to assess intra-experiment and inter-experiment reproducibility of the assay. ELISA assays were performed as described in example 4.
[0056] Results obtained in this second set of experiments are summarized in table 3.
[0057] Table 3. Results of Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISA) perfomed using the polysaccharide preparation of S. epidermidis SA1545 on 97 serum samples.
[0058] The IgM titres of each serum sample used for the statistical evaluation were mean values of four different determinations obtained in two different experiments. The IgG titres of each serum sample used for the statistical evaluation were mean values of two different determinations obtained in one experiment.
3TABLE 3
|
|
Mean IgM titre
(1:160)Mean IgM titre (1:320)Mean IgG titre (1:160)Mean IgG titre (1:320)
Patient category(range)(range)(range)(range)
|
A1) Control patients0.189 ± 0.0370.136 ± 0.0240,923 ± 0.18 0.692 ± 0.21
not infected and not(0.148 − 0.250)(0.116 − 0.155)(0.744 − 1.469)(0.293 − 1.198)
carrying a vascular
graft (n = 19)
A2) Control patients0.153 ± 0.0180.111 ± 0.0061.083 ± 0.4100.823 ± 0.356
not infected but(0.134 − 0.167)(0.105 − 0.116)(0.706 − 1.585)(0.476 − 1.243)
carrying a vascular
graft (n = 3)
A) Total control0.184 ± 0.0370.133 ± 0.0240,945 ± 0.22 0.709 ± 0.23
patients not infected(0.134 − 0.250)(0.0.105 − 0.155)(0.706 − 1.585)(0.293 − 1.243)
(n = 7)
B) Patients carrying a0.227 ± 0.0630.142 ± 0.0381.041 ± 0.2650.700 ± 0.259
vascular graft infected(0.128 − 0.291)(0.084 − 0.174)(0.763 − 1.480)(0.420 − 1.117)
by Gram-negative
bacteria (n = 5)
C) Patients not0.254 ± 0.0760.169 ± 0.0551.152 ± 0.4240.894 ± 0.527
infected but carrying a(0.185 − 0.379)(0.107 − 0.325)(0.513 − 1.689)(0.317 − 1.652)
vascular graft and with
a previous history of
vascular graft infection
caused by
Staphylococcus spp. (n =
13)
D) Patients carrying a0.642 ± 0.5160.377 ± 0.3961.532 ± 0.2781.303 ± 0.332
vascular graft infected(0.258 − >2.5)(0.127 − 2.448)(0.765 − 1.976)(0.522 − 2.013)
by Staphylococcus spp.
(n = 57)
|
[0059] Results of Student T test for comparison of IgM titres measured at serum dilution=1:160:
A
(A1+A2) vs. D: p=1.7×10−15.
B vs. D: p=
2.0×10−4.
C vs. D: p=
7.2×10−8.
A+B+C vs. D: p=
5.3×10−23.
A+C vs. B: p=
0.142.
A vs. C: p=
2.07×10−11.
[0060] Results of Student T test for comparison of IgG titres measured at serum dilution 1:320:
A
(A1+A2)vs. D: p=4,5×10−21.
B vs. D: p=
7.5×10−8.
C vs. D: p=
8.0×10−7.
A+B+C vs. D: p=
3.1×10−21.
A+C vs. B: p=
0.265.
A vs. C: p=
0.024.
[0061] Comments:
[0062] The antibody titres detectable against the slime polysaccahride (SP) of S. epidermidis SA1545 showed significant differences in groups of different subjects, according to their clinical history.
[0063] Significantly higher antibody titres against the SA1545-SP were found in patients carrying vascular grafts infected by Staphylococcus spp., as compared to: i) control subjects with no history of such infection, either carrying a vascular graft or not; ii) patients carrying a vascular graft infected by Gram-negative bacteria; iii) subjects carrying a vascular graft not infected, but reporting a previous history of vascular graft infection by Staphylococcus spp. These data overall indicate that vascular graft infection caused by Staphylococcus spp. elicit a specific humoral immune response against the SP, and that this response can be detected by enzyme immunoassays using a solid phase sensitized with the SA1545 SP preparation, as described in the patent application.
[0064] Analysis of the isotypic response anti-SA1545 SP in the above groups of subjects showed significant differences of both IgM and IgG antibody titres. The IgM titres were most closely related with the state of active infection caused by Staphylococcus spp.
[0065] The existence of a statistically significant difference between titers of infected and non infected patients allows to establish a break point value over which it is possible to define a high probability of the existence of an infective process. It is moreover possible to use this method to monitor the patient after insertion of the graft, using the antibody titer measured at the time of implantation as a specific reference value in the follow up.
[0066] It appears clear that the above described method has several advantages, as compared to conventional diagnostic methods in this field, since it is easy to perform, inexpensive and allows to obtain reliable results (with no need of invasive procedures) even in the early phases of infection, when all the other available methods frequently fail to give clear diagnostic informations; this method moreover allows a periodic monitoring of patients for the occurrence of latent infections and could give reliable informations on therapeutic outcomes.
[0067] The invention finally provides a kit to perform the assay, which includes the polysaccharide preparation, standard antibodies and reagents for detection in adequate containers together with vehicles, excipients and additives like preservatives and stabilizers.
[0068] Preferably the kit will contain microtiter strips pre-sensitized with the antigen together with positive and negative control sera (with their original titres).
[0069] The following examples are intended to better clarify the invention.
EXAMPLE 1
[0070] Characterization of a Bacterial Strain Adequate for the Assay.
[0071] A Staphylococcus epidermidis strain, indicated as SA1545—yielding the numeric code 6704773 when tested for identification with the API 20 STAPH identification system, was isolated from an aorto-bifemoral graft explanted from an adult male.
[0072] The isolate showed an evident dimorphism of colonies when grown on Columbia Agar plates supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood. It was negative for mannitol fermentation when crown on mannitol salt agar, with colonies showing a 1 mm or less of diameter after 18 h of incubation at 37° C.
[0073] The isolate was sensitive to the following antibiotics, as assessed using the Kirby Bauer assay: Gentamycin, Vancomycin, Ofloxacin, Erytromycin, Imipenem, Cephalotin, Amoxicillin+clavulanic acid, cefoperazone.
[0074] The biochemical pattern of the isolate is as follows:
4|
|
FermentationGlucose+
FermentationFructose+
FermentationMaltose+
FermentationLactose+
FermentationTrealose−
FermentationMannitol−
FermentationXylitol−
FermentationMelibiose−
FermentationRaffinose−
FermentationXylose−
FermentationSaccharose+
ProductionNitrates−
ProductionAlkaline phospatase−
ProductionAcetoine−
ProductionN-acetyl-glucosaminidase−
ProductionArginine hydrolase+
ProductionUrease+
|
[0075] In many other cases strains showing similar characteristics and adequate to be used for the assay of the invention have been isolated.
EXAMPLE 2
[0076] Preparation of the Culture Medium
[0077] The culture medium contains the following compounds per 1 liter:
5|
|
Na2HPO4(2H2O)10g
KH2PO43g
L-aspartic Acid150mg
L-alanine100mg
L-arginine100mg
L-cystine50mg
Glycine100mg
L-glutammic Acid150mg
L-hystidine100mg
L-isoleucine150mg
L-lysine100mg
L-leucine150mg
L-metionine100mg
L-phenylalanine100mg
L-proline150mg
L-serine100mg
L-threonine150mg
L-triptophane100mg
L-tyrosine100mg
L-valine150mg
Glucose10g
MgSO4(7H2O)500mg
Biotine0,1mg
nicotinic Acid2mg
D-pantotenic Acid2mg
Pyridoxal4mg
Pyridoxamine4mg
Riboflavin2mg
Tiamine2mg
Adenine20mg
Guanine20mg
CaCl2(6H2O)10mg
MnSO45mg
(NH4)2SO4FeSO4(6H2O)6mg
|
[0078] The formulation of the medium corresponds to the one described in Hussain, Hastings, White, J. Med. Microbiol. 34:143-147, 1991, with the following modifications, pertaining to the preparation: after all components of the medium are weighed, MgSO4(7H2O) is dissolved in distilled water, then all remaining components are added singularly, under continuos shaking. L-cystine prior to addition to the medium must be dissolved in 2-3 drops of 5N NaOH.
[0079] Once all components are dissolved (though a small amount of precipitate can persist) the volume is adjusted to 11 with distilled water and sterilized by filtration through 0,2 μm porous membranes.
EXAMPLE 3
[0080] Preparation of the Polysaccharide.
[0081] Strains are grown in 1000 ml of modified HHW medium for 6 days at 37° C. with shaking.
[0082] The bacterial pellet is collected by centrifugation at 13,000× g for 15 minutes at 4° C., suspended in 20 ml of sterile ice-cold physiological saline (NaCl 0.9%), and freezed at −20° C. for 2 h. The bacterial suspension is then thawed at room temperature and homogenized 10 times for 30 seconds with 30 seconds intervals.
[0083] The homogenate is then centrifuged at 13,000× g for 15 minutes at 4° C.; the resulting surnatant is stored at 4° C., while the resulting pellet is again suspended in 20 ml of sterile ice-cold saline and homogenized as above described. The surnatant resulting from the second homogenization step is added to the previously obtained one and desalted by dyalisis against 1,000 volumes of distilled water at 4° C. for 2 h, using diylisis membranes with a cut-off of 12 kDa. The sample is then freezed at −80° C., lyophilized, suspended in 5% (W/V) tricloroacetic acid and incubated 15 minutes at 4° C.
[0084] The sample is then centrifuged at 30,000× g for 30 minutes at 4° C.; 4 volumes of ice-cold absolute ethanol are then added to the surnatant, that is further incubated at 4° C. for 48 h. The bulk polysaccharide is then collected by centrifugation at 20,000× g for 30 minutes at 4° C., washed with 0.5 volumes of ice-cold absolute ethanol, dehydrated under vacuum and finally suspended in 2 ml of sterile distilled water. The polysaccharide obtained as above described is used to sensitize microtiter wells after adequate dilution (typically in 50 μl aliquots).
EXAMPLE 4
[0085] Execution of the ELISA Assay.
[0086] The wells of a microtiter plate are sensitized with 50 μl of the polysaccharide prepared according to example 3 and diluted {fraction (1/80)} in sterile distilled water, adequately sealed and incubated 18-24 hours at 4° C. After incubation the wells are emptied and washed 5 times with 100 μl of 0,05% tween 20 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS).
[0087] Wells are then emptied, saturated with 200 μl of 10% soy milk in PBS, adequately sealed and incubated at 37° C. for 1 hour. Wells are then emptied, washed as above described, and 50 μl aliquots of the diluted sera are added. Sera, including one positive control and one negative control, are typically diluted {fraction (1/160)} and {fraction (1/320)} in PBS. After addition of the sera the wells are adequately sealed and incubated at 37° C. for 1 hour. Wells are then emptied, washed as above described, and 50 μl of either “Peroxidase-Conjugated Rabbit Anti-human IgG” (for example DAKO cod. P0214) (diluted {fraction (1/15,000)} in 10% soy milk in PBS) or “Peroxidase Conjugated Rabbit anti-Human IgM” (for example DAKO cod. P0215) (diluted {fraction (1/1,500)} in 10% soy milk in PBS) are added. Wells are then adequately sealed, incubated at 37° C. for 1 hour, emptied and washed as above described.
[0088] Following last washing 50 μl of the chromogenic substrate for peroxidase (for example BM Blue POD Substrate Boehringer Mannheim, cod 1484281) are added to each well.
[0089] The wells are then incubated 10 minutes at 37° C. and the reaction is then stopped by adding 50 μl of 0.5N H2SO4. The OD450 nm of each well is then evaluated using a microtiter plate reader using one untreated well containing 100 μl of 0.5N H2SO4 as the blank.
[0090] As a general rule OD450 nm for positive control should not be over the value 1.5.
[0091] Should this happen the assay must be repeated, reducing the time of incubation of the peroxidase substrate.
Claims
- 1. A method for the determination of prosthetic infections in which at least one Staphylococcus strain is involved, which comprises detecting from blood samples or other biological fluid samples antibodies reacting with a polysaccharide produced by a virulent staphylococcal strain.
- 2. A method according to claim 1, in which the antibodies are IgG and IgM.
- 3. A method according to claims 1-2, in which the virulent staphylococcal strain is a strain of coagulase negative or positive species.
- 4. A method according to claim 3, in which said species is Staphylococcus epidermidis or Staphylococcus aureus.
- 5. A method according to claim 3, in which the virulent staphylococcal strain is DSMZ No. 11942.
- 6. A method according to claims 1-5, in which the polysaccharide is obtained by the following steps:
a) culturing the staphylococcal strains in modified HHW medium for a period of 4-6 days; b) homogenizing the bacterial cells in a physiological buffer; c) centrifugating at 13,000× g for 15 minutes and separating the surnatants; d) desalting by dyalisis the surnatant using membranes with a cut-off of 12 kDa; e) freezing and lyophilizing the solution obtained in (d); f) suspending the lyophilized material in a deproteinizing solution; g) centrifugating at 30,000× g the solution obtained in (f) and separating the surnatant with addition of ethanol; h) centrifugating the surnarant of step (g) at 20.000× g to obtain the polysaccharide; i) washing the precipitated polysaccharide with absolute ethanol, dehydrating in vacuo and suspending it in sterile H2O.
- 7. A method according to claims 1-6, which is in form of ELISA, gel immuno-precipitation, immuno-diffusion, contro-immunoelectrophoresis, radioimmunologic assay, complement fixation.
- 8. A process for preparing a polysaccharide from Staphylococcus cultures which comprises:
a) culturing the staphylococcal strains in modified HHW medium for a period of 4-6 days; b) homogenizing the bacterial cells in a physiological buffer; c) centrifugating at 13,000× g for 15 minutes and separating the surnatants; d) desalting by dyalisis the surnatant using membranes with a cut-off of 12 kDa; e) freezing and lyophilizing the solution obtained in (d); f) suspending the lyophilized material in a deproteinizing solution; g) centrifugating at 30,000× g the solution obtained in (f) and separating the surnatant with addition of ethanol; h) centrifugating the surnatant of step (g) at 20,000× g to obtain the polysaccharide; i) washing the precipitated polysaccharide with absolute ethanol, dehydrating in vacuo and suspending it in sterile H2O.
- 9. A polysaccharide obtainable by the process of claim 6.
- 10. A kit for use in a method according to claims 1-5, containing the polysaccharide, the antibodies and the detection reagents in suitable containers in combination with vehicles, excipients, additives, preservatives or stabilizers.
- 11. A kit according to claim 8, containing microtiter strips pre-sensitized with the antigen together with positive and negative control sera.
- 12. Use of a polysaccharide produced by virulent staphylococcal strains in an immunochemical assay for the determination of prosthetic infections.
- 13. Use according to claim 12, wherein the polysaccharide is that of claim 9.
- 14. Staphylococcal strain deposited at DSMZ under deposit No. 11942.
Priority Claims (2)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
MI98A000197 |
Feb 1998 |
IT |
|
PCT/EP99/00618 |
Feb 1999 |
EP |
|
Continuations (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
09601513 |
Sep 2000 |
US |
Child |
10135827 |
May 2002 |
US |