EXAMPLE 1
A closed reaction cell for oxidative conditions has been prepared by setting the velocity of flow to about 56.66 liter per minute at a given vacuum target of about 0.061 MPa (face velocity created by a vacuum pressure of 0.061 MPa), once set; the cell has been reopened. The valve configuration to collect the liquid nitrogen dioxide from the lecture bottle to the graduated glass tube has been set. The valve configuration has been reset back to reactor for nitrogen dioxide gas delivery. In a glass beaker 200.0 grams of the formulated oil as mentioned in the following tables with 15 ppm iron catalyst (Iron ferrocene) based on oil weight has been weighted and mixed in beaker. The mix of oil and catalyst has been charged to the reaction cell, agitation has been started and the reaction cell has been closed. The cell has been brought to reduced pressure (already set), the air flow has been adjusted to about 185 milliliters per minute and timer has been set to the specified reaction time of about 40 hours. The temperature controller has been set to heat the reaction to 170° Celsius and the nitrogen dioxide feed has been adjusted to deliver gas over 12 hours at a flow rate of about 0.16 milliliters per hour. The total weight of nitrogen dioxide delivered to the cell was 2.886 grams (1.443% by weight).
The test results of ASTM Reference Oils 438, 435 and 434 are mentioned in the following tables I, II and III,
TABLE I
|
|
Comparison of MRV TP-1 viscosity and Kinematic viscosity increase @
|
40° Celsius from the Sequence IIIG and Laboratory Reactor Aged Oils
|
% Viscosity Increase @
MRV TP-1 Ys, Pa/Viscosity,
|
Sample
40° Celsius
cP
|
|
ASTM Oil 438 Sequence IIIG Engine
|
1
88.0
No/16,700
|
2
90.0
No/18,000
|
3
91.0
No/19,000
|
4
94.8
No/19,300
|
5
99.4
No/20,500
|
6
104.7
No/20,500
|
7
109.5
No/23,700
|
8
115.1
No/30,400
|
ASTM Oil 438 Laboratory Reactor
|
1
74.0
No/16,570
|
2
101.0
No/14,100
|
3
109.0
No/21,120
|
4
113.0
No/26,400
|
5
127.0
No/30,000
|
6
133.0
No/29,800
|
7
152.0
No/27,300
|
|
TABLE II
|
|
Comparison of MRV TP-1 viscosity and Kinematic viscosity increase @
|
40° Celsius from the Sequence IIIG and Laboratory Reactor Aged Oils
|
% Viscosity Increase @
MRV TP-1 Ys, Pa/
|
Sample
40° Celsius
Viscosity, cP
|
|
ASTM Oil 435 Sequence IIIG Engine
|
1
163.0
Yes/84,800
|
2
168.0
Yes/110,100
|
3
172.0
Yes/84,500
|
4
176.0
Yes/91,900
|
5
222.0
Yes/300,200
|
6
230.0
Yes/294,000
|
7
279.0
Yes/210,700
|
8
305.0
Yes/400,000
|
ASTM Oil 435 Laboratory Reactor
|
1
185.0
Yes/99,300
|
2
226.0
Yes/83,500
|
3
256.0
Yes/182,800
|
4
310.0
Yes/85,400
|
|
TABLE III
|
|
Comparison of MRV TP-1 viscosity and Kinematic viscosity increase @
|
40° Celsius from the Sequence IIIG and Laboratory Reactor Aged Oils
|
% Viscosity Increase @
MRV TP-1 Ys, Pa/Viscosity,
|
Sample
40° Celsius
cP
|
|
ASTM Oil 434 Sequence IIIG Engine
|
1
63.0
No/29,000
|
2
87.0
No/34,200
|
3
90.0
No/31,900
|
4
99.0
No/45,600
|
5
127.0
No/49,200
|
6
133.0
No/48,900
|
7
250.0
No/86,400
|
ASTM Oil 434 Laboratory Reactor
|
1
57.0
No/30,000
|
2
59.0
No/32,500
|
3
94.0
No/43,300
|
4
118.0
No/48,000
|
5
122.0
No/57,600
|
|