METHOD FOR THE DIFFERENTIAL ENUMERATION OF LACTIC ACID BACTERIA IN A MIXTURE IN A FOOD PRODUCT

Abstract
The invention relates to a method for distinguishing between and enumerating strains of lactic acid bacteria or Bifidobacteria present in a food product. This method implements various agar culture media and/or selective culture conditions, combined with various chromogenic substrates.
Description

The present invention relates to the differentiation and counting of bacterial strains of interest present in a mixture in a food product, especially a dairy product.


In the manufacture of fermented products, and especially dairy products, mixtures of bacteria which may comprise bacteria of different genera, and/or bacteria of the same genus and of different species or subspecies, and/or different strains of bacteria of the same species or subspecies, are generally used as ferments. In particular, probiotic products usually comprise, aside from one or more probiotic strains, one or more “technological” strains which do not necessarily have probiotic properties but enable, for example, the growth of the probiotic strains to be improved, and/or make it possible to confer the desired properties (flavor, texture, etc.) on the finished product.


So as to guarantee the quality of the fermented products during their manufacture, at the end of their manufacture and during their storage, it is necessary to be able to specifically differentiate and count the probiotic and technological bacterial strains present in these products, which may be problematic especially in cases in which at least two of the strains used in the product belong to neighboring species of the same genus, or to the same species or even to the same subspecies.


It is therefore desirable to have reliable and rapid analytical techniques which enable the differential counting of these strains.


The inventors have now developed a method based on the use of selective culture media and/or selective culture conditions, combined with the use of different chromogenic substrates.


Consequently, the subject of the present invention is a method for distinguishing from one another, and counting, strains of lactic acid bacteria or Bifidobacteria of a known mixture, which are present in different population amounts in a food product, preferably a dairy product, fermented using said strains, characterized in that it comprises:


a) inoculating aliquots of the optionally diluted food product in a series of culture dishes containing a chemically defined agar M1 medium and at least two chromogenic substrates producing different colorations, each of said substrates being taken up by at least one of said bacterial strains, and not being taken up by at least one other of said strains;


b) optionally, inoculating aliquots of the optionally diluted food product in a series of culture dishes containing a chemically defined agar M2 medium enabling the growth of the lactic acid bacterial strains present in the product to be tested, which strains cannot grow on the M1 medium , and at least one chromogenic substrate taken up by at least one of said bacterial strains;


c) incubating said dishes for the time necessary to form bacterial colonies, and counting the colonies for each of the colorations observed in each culture dish.


Within the meaning of the invention, the expression “lactic acid bacteria or Bifidobacteria” preferably refers to all anaerobic, partially oxygen-tolerant Gram positive bacteria which generally do not produce spores, which bacteria are in rod or coccus form and are capable of fermenting sugars to lactic acid. More preferably, the lactic acid bacteria within the meaning of the invention belong to at least one of the families Aerococcaceae, Carnobacteriaceae, Enterococcaceae, Lactobacillaceae, Leuconostocaceae, Streptococcaceae or Bifidobacteriaceae, and even more preferably to one of the genera Aerococcus, Carnobacterium, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Oenococcus, Pediococcus, Streptococcus, Tetragenococcus, Vagococcus, Weissella or Bifidobacterium. Most particularly preferably, the lactic acid bacteria or Bifidobacteria within the meaning of the invention belong to at least one of the species Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus buchneri, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus curvatus, Lactobacillus delbruckei, in particular L. delbruckei supsb. bulgaricus or lactis, Lactobacillus diolivorans, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus fructivorans, Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus hilgardii, Lactobacillus jensenii, Lactobacillus kunkeei, Lactobacillus mall, Lactobacillus nagelii, Lactobacillus paracasei, in particular L. paracasei subsp. paracasei, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus vini, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Streptococcus lactis, Streptococcus raffinolactis, Streptococcus cremoris, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifidobacterium animalis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium infantis, Bifidobacterium lactis, or Bifidobacterium longum; the Bifidobacteria within the meaning of the invention gather the bacteria belonging to the family Bifidobacteriaceae, especially to the genus Bifidobacterium.


“Known mixture” is intended to mean a mixture of bacterial strains, the qualitative composition of which is known, that is to say the nature and the characteristics of the different strains which constitute it. It relies more specifically to the mixture of strains used for the manufacture of the fermented product on which the analysis is based. Before carrying out the method in accordance with the invention, these strains will have been subjected to a phenotypic analysis with the aim of highlighting their physiological and metabolic characteristics, so as to establish a phenotypic profile specific to each strain. This analysis may especially relate to the use of different types of sources of carbon, nitrogen, phosphate and sulfur, to the use of given nutritional additives, and/or to the resistance to different stressing agents (salts, pH, antimicrobial agents, etc.).


The term “chemically defined medium” is used here in its usual sense, to denote a culture medium, all the components of which are entirely known and defined. The chemically defined agar medium according to the invention is preferably an agar bacterial culture medium, more preferably an agar culture medium for lactic acid bacteria or Bifidobacteria.


As it is intended here, the expression “chromogenic substrate” preferably denotes a substrate, the uptake of which by a bacterium produces a substance that absorbs light at one or more wavelengths, especially a colored substance. As those skilled in the art will well appreciate, the wavelength(s) absorbed by the substance produced are preferably different to that (those) optionally absorbed by the chromogenic substrate, which may especially be colorless. Chromogenic substrates which may be used to carry out the present invention are known per se; they may be, especially, 6-chloro-3-indoxyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (salmon Gal), 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (X-Glu), 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal).


The agar medium of a portion of the culture dishes may also comprise at least one additive selectively promoting the growth of at least one of said bacterial strains, and/or the agar medium of a portion of the culture dishes may also comprise at least one additive selectively inhibiting the growth of at least one of said bacterial strains.


Also, a portion of the culture dishes may be incubated under selective conditions favorable to the growth of at least one of said bacterial strains, and another portion of said culture dishes may be incubated under different selective conditions favorable to the growth of at least one other of said bacterial strains.


The method in accordance with the invention is particularly suited to the analysis of products in which at least two of the present bacterial strains belong to the same species and subspecies.


Preferably, at least one of the bacterial strains present in the product to be tested belongs to the genus Lactobacillus and/or at least one of the bacterial strains present in the product to be tested belongs to the genus Streptococcus.


According to a particular embodiment of the present invention, the product to be tested contains at least one strain of Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, at least one strain of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, and at least one strain of Streptococcus thermophilus. Advantageously, it also contains at least one strain of Lactobacillus rhamnosus.


Within the context of this embodiment, to count the bacteria of the species Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Streptococcus thermophilus, a M1 medium with the following composition is used: agar: 15 g/l; tryptone: 2.5 g/l; pepsin-digested meat peptone: 2.5 g/l; papain-digested soya peptone: 5 g/l; sodium glycerophosphate: 19 g/l; lactose: 5 g/l; yeast extract: 2.5 g/l; meat extract: 5 g/l; magnesium sulfate: 0.25 g/l; ascorbic acid: 0.5 g/l; 6-chloro-3-indoxyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (salmon Gal): 0.2 g/l; 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (X-Glu): 0.1 g/l.


To count the bacteria of the species Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, a M2 medium with the following composition is used: polypeptone: 10 g/l; yeast extract: 5 g/l; meat extract: 10 g/l; dipotassium phosphate: 2 g/l; sodium acetate: 5 g/l; ammonium citrate: 2 g/l; magnesium sulfate: 0.2 g/l; manganese sulfate: 0.05 g/l; agar: 15 g/l; 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (-Gal): 0.15 g/l.


Advantageously, to count the bacteria of the species Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Streptococcus thermophilus:


a first portion of the dishes containing the M1 medium does not comprise any additive, a second portion of said dishes comprises vancomycin as an additive, and a third portion of said dishes comprises rhamnose as an additive; and/or


the inoculated dishes are incubated for approximately 48 hours under a controlled atmosphere containing from 6 to 16% O2 and from 2 to 10% CO2, a portion of said dishes being incubated at approximately 37° C., and another portion at approximately 44° C.


Preferably, to count the bacteria of the species Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus, the inoculated dishes of M2 medium are incubated for approximately 48 hours at approximately 47° C. under a controlled atmosphere containing less than 1% O2 and at least 13% CO2.


The present invention will be better understood by means of the following additional description which makes reference to nonlimiting examples illustrating carrying out a method in accordance with the invention to differentiate different strains of lactic acid bacteria and to count the bacteria of each of these strains in fermented dairy products.







EXAMPLE
Differential Counting of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Fermented Dairy Products
Materials and Methods:
Composition of the Products Tested
Product 1:

Product 1 is a fermented product containing 5 bacterial strains belonging to three species, namely:


1 probiotic strain of L. casei subsp. paracasei (hereinafter referred to as Lactobacillus paracasei strain 1);


3 technological strains of S. thermophilus;


1 technological strain of L. delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus.


The theoretical bacterial loads expected at the start of the self life (D4) and at the end of the, self life (D35) of the product are indicated in table I below.










TABLE I








Theoretical bacterial load



(in bacteria/ml)










D4
D35






Lactobacillus
paracasei strain 1

2 × 108
2 × 108


3 Streptococcusthermophilus
>108
>108



Lactobacillus
bulgaricus

1 × 107
101 to 104









Product 2:

Product 2 is a fermented product containing 7 bacterial strains belonging to three species, namely:


2 probiotic strains of L. casei subsp. paracasei (Lactobacillus paracasei strain 1 and Lactobacillus paracasei strain 2);


1 probiotic strain of L. rhamnosus;


3 technological strains of S. thermophilus;


1 technological strain of L. delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus.


The theoretical bacterial loads expected at the beginning of the shelf life (D4) and at the end of the shelf life (D35) of the product are indicated in table II below.










TABLE II








Theoretical bacterial load



(in bacteria/ml)










D4
D35






Lactobacillus
paracasei

2 to 3 × 108
2 to 3 × 108


strain 1 and strain 2





Lactobacillus
rhamnosus

1 × 108
l × 108


3 Streptococcusthermophilus
1 × 108
l × 108



Lactobacillus
bulgaricus

1 × 107
101 to 104









Enzymatic Activities of the Strains:

The different strains were tested for their β-glucosidase and β-galactosidase activities.


The results are indicated in table III below.













TABLE III







Strain
β-Glucosidase
β-Galactosidase










Lactobacillus
rhamnosus

+
+




Lactobacillus
paracasei 1

+





Lactobacillus
paracasei 2







Streptococcus
thermophilus 1


+




Streptococcus
thermophilus 2


+




Streptococcus
thermophilus 3


+




Lactobacillus
bulgaricus


+










Bacteria Counting in Products 1 and 2:
Culture Conditions and Media:

The culture conditions and media currently used for counting bacterial strains present in products 1 and 2 are summarized in tables IV and V, respectively, below. These reference culture conditions and media were used as controls.













TABLE IV





Strain studied
Medium
Temperature
Duration
Atmosphere








Lactobacillus

MRS +
37° C.
48 hours
CO2



paracasei 1

vancomycin






(1 μg/ml)






Streptococcus
sp.

M17
44° C.
48 hours
Aerobic



Lactobacillus

Acid MRS
50° C.
48 hours
Anaerobic



bulgaricus





















TABLE V





Strain studied
Medium
Temperature
Duration
Atmosphere








Lactobacillus

MRS +
44° C.
48 hours
CO2



rhamnosus

vancomycin






(1 μg/ml)






Lactobacillus

MRS +
37° C.
48 hours
CO2



rhamnosus +

vancomycin






Lactobacillus

(1 μg/ml)






paracasei 1 +








Lactobacillus








paracasei 2








Streptococcus
sp.

M17
44° C.
48 hours
Aerobic



Lactobacillus

Acid MRS
50° C.
48 hours
Anaerobic



bulgaricus










The MRS, acid MRS and M17 media are conventional commercially available media (AES CHEMUNEX).


For the cultures under a controlled atmosphere, GASPAK® gas generating systems were used to obtain the following conditions:


anaerobic conditions: % O2<1%; % CO2≧13%


CO2: % CO2>2.5%


microaerobic conditions: 6% <% O2<16%; 2%<% CO2<10%


aerobic conditions: ambient air


Two chromogenic media, hereinafter referred to as M1 and M2, were prepared: the composition of these media is indicated in tables VI and VII below, respectively:









TABLE VI







M1 Medium











Concentration



Constituent
(in g/l)














Agar
15



Tryptone
2.5



Pepsin-digested meat peptone
2.5



Papain-digested soya peptone
5



Sodium glycerophosphate
19



Lactose
5



Yeast extract
2.5



Meat extract
5



Magnesium sulfate
0.25



Ascorbic acid
0.5



6-Chloro-3-indoxyl-β-D-galactopyranoside
0.2



(salmon Gal)




5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucopyranoside
0.1



(X-Glu)

















TABLE VII







M2 Medium









Concentration


Constituent
(in g/l)











Polypeptone
10


Yeast extract
5


Meat extract
10


Dipotassium phosphate
2


Sodium acetate
5


Ammonium citrate
2


Magnesium sulfate
0.2


Manganese sulfate
0.05


Agar
15


5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside
0.15


(X-Gal)









The tests were carried out with 3 different batches of each of the M1 and M2 media.


The culture conditions used for products 1 and 2 are respectively indicated in tables VIII and IX below:













TABLE VIII





Strain studied
Medium
Temperature
Duration
Atmosphere








Lactobacillus

M1
37° C.
48 hours
Microaerobic



paracasei 1 +








Streptococcus
sp.








Lactobacillus

M2
47° C.
48 hours
Anaerobic



bulgaricus





















TABLE IX





Strain studied
Medium
Temperature
Duration
Atmosphere








Lactobacillus

M1 +
37° C.
48 hours
Microaerobic



paracasei 1

rhamnose






(10 g/l)






Lactobacillus

M1 +
37° C.
48 hours
Microaerobic



paracasei 2

vancomycin






(1 μg/ml)






Lactobacillus

M1
44° C.
48 hours
Microaerobic



rhamnosus +








Streptococcus
sp.








Lactobacillus

M2
47° C.
48 hours
Anaerobic



bulgaricus










Operating Protocol:

Samples were taken at two self life phases of the products: start of life and end of life.


For product 1, start of self life samples were taken at 4, 5 and 6 days after the manufacture of the fermented product, and end of self life samples were taken at 31, 32 and 33 days after the manufacture; for product 2, start of self life samples were taken at 7, 8 and 9 days after the manufacture, and end of self life samples were taken at 28, 29 and 30 days after the manufacture.


For each test specimen, a range of dilutions to 1/10 was carried out in tryptone salt tubes. Three dilutions, chosen as a function of the theoretical populations (cf. Tables I and II), were inoculated on each of the media used. For each dilution, 1 ml of diluted product was inoculated in 1 Petri dish, and 15 ml of the medium used were poured into the dish.


The dishes were incubated under the conditions, and for the durations, indicated in tables IV, V, VIII and IX.


RESULTS
Identification of the Strains:

On M1 medium:


at 44° C., the Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain produces blue-colored colonies, and the Streptococcus thermophilus strains produce magenta-colored colonies; the Lactobacillus paracasei strains 1 and 2 and the Lactobacillus bulgaricus strain do not grow;


at 37° C. with addition of rhamnose, the Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain and the Lactobacillus paracasei strain 2 produce colorless colonies; the Lactobacillus paracasei strain 1 produces turquoise-colored colonies and the Streptococcus thermophilus strains produce magenta-colored colonies. The Lactobacillus bulgaricus strain does not grow;


at 37° C. with addition of vancomycin, the Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain produces blue colonies; the Lactobacillus paracasei strain 1 produces turquoise-colored colonies and the Lactobacillus paracasei strain 2 produces colorless colonies; the Streptococcus thermophilus strains and the Lactobacillus bulgaricus strain do not grow.


On M2 medium:


the Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain produces colorless colonies, and the Lactobacillus bulgaricus strain produces blue colonies. The Streptococcus thermophilus strains and the Lactobacillus paracasei strains 1 and 2 do not grow.


These results are summarized in table X below:











TABLE X








M1 Medium














Addition of






rhamnose and
Addition of




Incubation
incubation
vancomycin and



Name of strain
at 44° C.
at 37° C.
incubation at 37° C.
M2 Medium






Lactobacillus

Blue
Colorless
Blue
Colorless



rhamnosus








Lactobacillus

Absence of
Turquoise
Turquoise
Absence of



paracasei 1

growth


growth



Lactobacillus

Absence of
Colorless
Colorless
Absence of



paracasei 2

growth


growth



Streptococcus

Magenta
Magenta
Absence of
Absence of



thermophilus (strains



growth
growth


1, 2, and 3)







Lactobacillus

Absence of
Absence of
Absence of
Blue



bulgaricus

growth
growth
growth



Strain(s) identified

Lactobacillus


Lactobacillus


Lactobacillus


Lactobacillus





rhamnosus and


paracasei 1


paracasei 2


bulgaricus





Streptococcus








thermophilus










Product 1:

M1 Medium therefore makes it possible to count Lactobacillus paracasei and Streptococcus thermophilus, and M2 medium makes it possible to count Lactobacillus bulgaricus.


Product 2:

M1 Medium therefore makes it possible to count:


at 44° C.: Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Streptococcus thermophilus


with addition of rhamnose at 37° C.: Lactobacillus paracasei strain 1;


with addition of vancomycin at 37° C.: Lactobacillus paracasei strain 2.


M2 Medium makes it possible to count Lactobacillus bulgaricus.


Bacteria Counting Bacteria:
Product 1:
Early in Self Life:

The results are illustrated in table XI.














TABLE XI







Reference







medium





Species

(control)
Batch 1
Batch 2
Batch 3








L.
paracasei 1

Bacterial load
5.4 × 108 
6.1 × 108
5.7 × 108
6.2 × 108



Difference vs. control (log)

+0.06
+0.03
+0.07



S.
thermophilus

Bacterial load
6.4 × 108 
5.3 × 108
6.8 × 108
5.5 × 108



Difference vs. control (log)

−0.08
+0.03
−0.07



L.
bulgaricus

Bacterial load
1.6 × 106*
  3 × 106
  3 × 106
2.8 × 106



Difference vs. control (log)

+0.27
+0.26
  0.23









The variability of the counting method is as follows:

    • On M1 medium: between 5.7×108 CFU/ml and 6.2×108 CFU/ml for L. paracasei 1, between 5.3×108 CFU/ml and 6.8×108 CFU/ml for S. thermophilus,
    • On M2 medium: between 2.8×106 CFU/ml and 3×106 CFU/ml for L. bulgaricus.


Difficulties in counting L. bulgaricus on the reference medium, acid MRS, are to be noted:


day 5: difference of one log versus medium M2 and the count from D4,


day 6: absence of growth.


End of Self Life:

The results are illustrated in table XII.














TABLE XII







Reference







medium





Species

(control)
Batch 1
Batch 2
Batch 3








L.
paracasei 1

Bacterial load
4.5 × 108
4.1 × 108
  4 × 108
4.5 × 108



Difference vs. control (log)

−0.04
−0.05
−0.01



S.
thermophilus

Bacterial load
1.8 × 108
1.9 × 108
1.9 × 108
2.2 × 108



Difference vs. control (log)

+0.02
+0.02
+0.08



L.
bulgaricus

Bacterial load
Absence
Absence
Absence
Absence



Difference vs. control (log)

N.A.
N.A.
N.A.









M1 Medium makes it possible to effectively discriminate between Lactobacillus paracasei and Streptococcus thermophilus present in the product. The counts for L. paracasei vary between 4×108 CFU/ml and 4.5×108 CFU/ml over the three batches and over three days of analysis. The load of S. thermophilus varies between 1.9×108 CFU/ml and 2.2×108 CFU/ml.


These tests also demonstrate the absence of L. bulgaricus in the product at this lifetime stage, whether on the reference medium or on M2 medium.


Product 2:
Early in Self Life:

The results are illustrated in table XIII.













TABLE XIII









Reference
















medium





Species

(control)
Batch 1
Batch 2
Batch 3






L.
paracasei


L.
paracasei 1 bacterial load

  2 × 108
1.6 × 108
1.8 × 108
1.7 × 108


1 and 2

L.
paracasei 2 bacterial load


2.3 × 107
  3 × 107
2.8 × 107



Difference vs. control (log)

−0.02
+0.03
  0.00



S.
thermophilus

Bacterial load
8.9 × 108
8.7 × 108
9.1 × 108
9.8 × 108



Difference vs. control (log)

−0.01
+0.01
+0.04



L.
rhamnosus

Bacterial load
2.3 × 108
2.3 × 108
2.3 × 108
2.3 × 108



Difference vs. control (log)

  0.00
  0.00
  0.00



L.
bulgaricus

Bacterial load
2.5 × 105
4.6 × 105
2.6 × 105
3.1 × 105



Difference vs. control (log)

+0.27
+0.03
  0.10









The variability of the counting method is as follows:

    • On M1 medium: between 1.6×108 CFU/ml and 1.8×108 CFU/ml for L. paracasei 1, between 2.3×107 CFU/ml and 3×107 CFU/ml for L. paracasei 2, between 8.7×108 CFU/ml and 9.8×108 CFU/ml for S. thermophilus, 2.3×108 CFU/ml for the three batches for L. rhamnosus
    • On M2 medium: between 2.6×105 CFU/ml and 5×105 CFU/ml for L. bulgaricus.


End of Self Life:

The results are illustrated in table XIV.














TABLE XIV







Reference







medium





Species

(control)
Batch 1
Batch 2
Batch 3








L.
paracasei


L.
paracasei 1 bacterial load

2.1 × 108
1.6 × 108
1.5 × 108
1.6 × 108


1 and 2

L.
paracasei 2 bacterial load


1.4 × 107
2.2 × 107
2.2 × 107



Difference vs. control (log)

−0.07
−0.08
−0.05



S.
thermophilus

Bacterial load
7.3 × 108
6.8 × 108
6.6 × 108
7.5 × 108



Difference vs. control (log)

−0.03
−0.04
+0.01



L.
rhamnosus

Bacterial load
1.8 × 108
2.0 × 108
2.0 × 108
2.0 × 108



Difference vs. control (log)

+0.03
+0.04
+0.04



L.
bulgaricus

Bacterial load
Absence
Absence
Absence
Absence



Difference vs. control (log)

N.A.
N.A.
N.A.









The counts over the three batches of M1 medium vary between 1.5×108 CFU/ml and 1.6×108 CFU/ml for L. paracasei 1, between 1.4×107 CFU/ml and 2.2×107 CFU/ml for L. paracasei 2, between 6.6×108 CFU/ml and 7.5×108 CFU/ml for S. thermophilus, 2.0×108 CFU/ml for the three batches for L. rhamnosus.


The tests also demonstrate the absence of L. bulgaricus in the product at this lifetime stage, whether on the reference medium or on M2 medium.


Use of the method described above makes it possible to discriminate between the three bacterial species present in product 1 and the four present in product 2.

Claims
  • 1. A method for distinguishing from one another, and counting, strains of lactic acid bacteria or Bifidobacteria in a known mixture, which are present in different population amounts in a dairy product, wherein the method comprises: a) inoculating aliquots of said food product in a series of culture dishes each containing a chemically defined agar M1 medium and at least two chromogenic substrates producing different colorations, each of said substrates being taken up by at least one of said bacterial strains, and not being taken up by at least one other of said strains; andb) optionally, inoculating aliquots of said food product in a series of culture dishes containing a chemically defined agar M2 medium enabling the growth of the lactic acid bacterial strains present in the product to be tested, which strains cannot grow on the M1 medium, and at least one chromogenic substrate taken up by at least one of said bacterial strains; andc) incubating said dishes for the time necessary to form bacterial colonies, and counting the colonies for each of the colorations observed in each culture dish.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the agar medium of a portion of the culture dishes also comprises at least one additive selectively promoting the growth of at least one of said bacterial strains, and/or the agar medium of a portion of the culture dishes also comprises at least one additive selectively inhibiting the growth of at least one of said bacterial strains.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein a portion of said culture dishes is incubated under selective conditions favorable to the growth of at least one of said bacterial strains, and another portion of the culture dishes is incubated under different selective conditions favorable to the growth of at least one other of said bacterial strains.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein at least two of the bacterial strains present in the product to be tested belong to the same species and subspecies.
  • 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the bacterial strains present in the product to be tested belongs to the genus Lactobacillus and/or at least one of the bacterial strains present in the product to be tested belongs to the genus Streptococcus.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the product to be tested contains at least one strain of Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, at least one strain of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, and at least one strain of Streptococcus thermophilus.
  • 7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the product to be tested also contains at least one strain of Lactobacillus rhamnosus.
  • 8. The method according to claim 6, wherein to count the bacteria of the species Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Streptococcus thermophilus, a M1 medium with the following composition is used: agar: 15 g/l; tryptone: 2.5 g/l; pepsin-digested meat peptone: 2.5 g/l; papain-digested soya peptone: 5 g/l; sodium glycerophosphate: 19 g/l; lactose: 5 g/l; yeast extract: 2.5 g/l; meat extract: 5 g/l; magnesium sulfate: 0.25 g/l; ascorbic acid: 0.5 g/l; 6-chloro-3-indoxyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (salmon Gal): 0.2 g/l; 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (X-Glu): 0.1 g/l.
  • 9. The method according to claim 7, wherein to count the bacteria of the species Lactobacillus delbrueckii bulgaricus, a M2 medium with the following composition is used: polypeptone: 10 g/l; yeast extract: 5 g/l; meat extract: 10 g/l; dipotassium phosphate: 2 g/l; sodium acetate: 5 g/l; ammonium citrate: 2 g/l; magnesium sulfate: 0.2 g/l; manganese sulfate: 0.05 g/l; agar: 15 g/l; 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal): 0.15 g/l.
  • 10. The method according to claim 8, wherein to count the bacteria of the species Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Streptococcus thermophilus, a first portion of the dishes containing the M1 medium does not comprise any additive, a second portion of said dishes comprises vancomycin as additive, and a third portion of said dishes comprises rhamnose as additive.
  • 11. The method according to claim 7, wherein to count the bacteria of the species Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Streptococcus thermophilus, the inoculated dishes are incubated for approximately 48 hours under a controlled atmosphere containing from 6 to 16% O2 and from 2 to 10% CO2, a portion of said dishes being incubated at approximately 37° C., and another portion at approximately 44° C.
  • 12. The method according to claim 7, wherein to count the bacteria of the species Lactobacillus delbrueckii bulgaricus, the inoculated dishes are incubated for approximately 48 hours at approximately 47° C. under a controlled atmosphere containing less than 1% O2 and at least 13% CO2.
  • 13. The method according to claim 2, wherein a portion of said culture dishes is incubated under selective conditions favorable to the growth of at least one of said bacterial strains, and another portion of the culture dishes is incubated under different selective conditions favorable to the growth of at least one other of said bacterial strains.
  • 14. The method according to claim 2, wherein at least two of the bacterial strains present in the product to be tested belong to the same species and subspecies.
  • 15. The method according to claim 3, wherein at least two of the bacterial strains present in the product to be tested belong to the same species and subspecies.
  • 16. The method according to claim 2, wherein at least one of the bacterial strains present in the product to be tested belongs to the genus Lactobacillus and/or at least one of the bacterial strains present in the product to be tested belongs to the genus Streptococcus.
  • 17. The method according to claim 3, wherein at least one of the bacterial strains present in the product to be tested belongs to the genus Lactobacillus and/or at least one of the bacterial strains present in the product to be tested belongs to the genus Streptococcus.
  • 18. The method according to claim 4, wherein at least one of the bacterial strains present in the product to be tested belongs to the genus Lactobacillus and/or at least one of the bacterial strains present in the product to be tested belongs to the genus Streptococcus.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
PCT/IB2013/060988 Dec 2013 IB international
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/FR2014/053359 12/16/2014 WO 00