Patent Grant
8915013
This is a U.S. national stage of application No. PCT/EP2009/065025, filed on Nov. 12, 2009. Priority is claimed on the following application: German Application No.: 102008043715.8 filed on Nov. 13, 2008, the content of which is incorporated here by reference.
The invention relates to a method for the control and destruction of pathogenic microorganisms, in particular insects and worms, in an aquatic system, preferably for monitoring and controlling larvae. In a preferred fashion the invention relates to a method for controlling gnat/mosquito larvae in water bodies. Sustained reduction of microorganisms or destruction of their larvae is achieved by a two-step process in which chemical agents, such as insecticides, and biological agents are used in combination. Chemical agents specifically kill the larvae (e.g. mosquitoes) present in the aquatic system. Recolonization is prevented by zooplankton communities as biological agents which, according to the invention, preferably comprise food competitors of the microorganisms and larvae thereof. The combined use of chemical (insecticidal) and biological treatment in aquatic systems allows efficient and lasting control of insects and worms.
Numerous pathogenic microorganisms from the families of insects and worms are doing damage to humans, animals and plants. More specifically, the threat of insects, preferably mosquitoes, as carriers of disease (vectors) is increasing worldwide. This applies to tropical regions (Epstein, 1998), but also increasingly to temperate climates, for instance, the spread of Aedes albopictus in Italy since 1990 and its recent spread towards Germany (Knudsen et al., 1996). The out-breaks of Chikungunya fever in North-East Italy (Enserink, 2008) and the number of West Nile virus cases reported recently in USA and Europe (Balenghien, 2007) demonstrate the increasing relevance of vector-borne diseases to humans. As climate change and associated changes in weather (e.g., warming, rainfall patterns and resulting floods) are expected to continue, the problems associated with insects such as mosquitoes—and the diseases they transmit—are likely to increase in the future. Apart from mosquitoes, the schistosomiasis-causing larvae of schistosomes (trematodes), for example, likewise represent a major problem. There is thus an urgent need to develop effective methods of controlling such populations.
Thus, for example, mosquitoes live in two highly different habitats:
Mosquitoes are typical pioneer species (first species to colonize newly formed water bodies). For this reason, mosquitoes are frequently found in new or periodically drying water bodies, i.e., waters wherein few other species (e.g. those acting as competitors) are encountered.
As a rule, insecticides (chemical toxins) destroying the larvae are used in water bodies to reduce the larvae. The associated problems are well-known:
The invention was therefore based on the object of developing a method for the control and destruction of pathogenic and/or troublesome insects and worms, which method no longer has the disadvantages of agents previously used, or only to a minor extent.
Said object is accomplished by means of a two-step method for the control and destruction of human, animal and plant pathogenic microorganisms from the families of insects and worms and larvae thereof in an aquatic system. The method is used in aquatic systems which contain said insects and worms and/or larvae thereof or tend to allow their growth therein, i.e., in water bodies wherein mosquito eggs may already be present. According to the invention, effective amounts of at least one insecticide and, at the same time, a zooplankton community as biological agent are added to the aquatic system. The insecticide(s) and biological agents are used in a harmonized manner, so that the development of the biological agent would not be impaired or only to a minor extent.
It is preferred to use an effective amount of a chemical and/or bacterial insecticide that has a specific (selective) effect. According to the invention, food competitors of the insects, worms and larvae are preferably used as biological agents. According to the invention, said food competitors are zooplankton communities. In a preferred fashion the agents are placed on the surface of the aquatic system and/or incorporated in the aquatic system at the same time. The inventive combination allows effective and lasting reduction of larvae by using toxins with a specific effect and the above-described process of biological competition in close temporal proximity.
The invention makes use of the finding that the abundance of pioneer species such as mosquitoes decreases in water bodies bearing water for a prolonged period of time, while other species such as daphnia and copepods (zooplankton communities) become more abundant. Most of the species gradually replacing the insects are competitors for food, thereby reducing the food resources of these insects. However, the process of reducing larvae cannot be applied in practice because technical operation is ineffective. One major drawback is that displacement of the larvae by competitors is exceedingly slow, so that displacement takes several months.
More specifically, the human, animal and plant pathogenic insects to be controlled are mosquitoes or gnats. Control is understood to be reduction of a population. The method according to the invention is specifically directed to the control of pathogenic insects by destroying the larvae thereof in their preferred habitat, i.e. an aquatic system. Aquatic systems are understood to be water bodies in general, i.e. usually shallow waters, such as banks of lakes, ponds, rice fields, marshes and the like.
Apart from mosquitoes, insects to be controlled according to the invention are flies and bugs that transmit protozoa, nematodes and viruses upon bite or contact and thereby may cause serious diseases.
Pathogenic worms of particular interest in association with disease transmission and thus requiring control include schistosomiasis-causing schistosomes (trematodes, leeches), the larvae of which are present in brackish and fresh water, or fish pathogenic tapeworms and nematodes living in water.
The method of the invention combines the chemical method of control and an ecological component for long-term control of larvae by promoting or incorporating natural competitors.
As mentioned above, the preferred insecticides are used in combination with biological agents representing natural competitors of the insects. Preferred zooplankton communities are mixed or single-species zooplankton communities likewise utilizing the food resources in the area, so that recovery of the larvae is suppressed and prevented. In general, zooplankton is understood to represent animal microorganisms freely floating in sea or fresh water, usually microscopically small animal organisms, including e.g. species such as crustaceans and other invertebrates.
By using insecticides and food competitors in close temporal proximity, the inventive combination results in nearly complete suppression of new larval development.
The applied insecticides reduce the abundance of larvae towards zero. When selecting the insecticide, care should be taken that damage to competitors is as low as possible. According to the invention, it is preferred to select substances having a selective effect which, on the one hand, rapidly destroy in particular the larvae and, on the other hand, do not damage the zooplankton communities and allow rapid growth thereof. Owing to the use of insecticides, larvae and thus rivals for food are barely present anymore. In this way, resurgence of the population after the use of insecticides is prevented as a result of the presence of natural competitors. Application of the insecticide can be as a single use, and additional use is usually not necessary. In this way, the disadvantages of the prior art in using insecticides can be reduced, and the additional use of food competitors for the larvae makes treatment with further toxic substances unnecessary. The success of the method is based on the fact that two components responsible for the development of larvae are affected: short-term reduction of larvae by the insecticides (preferably so-called larvicides) and long-term prevention of recolonization by incorporating zooplankton communities (food competitors).
The inventive method for the control of larvae is far superior to previous methods merely comprising the chemical component, i.e. insecticide treatment, which results in a short-term reduction of larvae. The present method achieves long-lasting suppression of larvae development, which has not been possible with well-known agents and methods. Being a combination of chemical and biological components, the method according to the invention is perfectly suited to effect long-term destruction and/or control of larvae.
The insecticides used as part of the invention for the initial reduction of larvae have a specific effect against the respective population and have no or barely any adverse effects on other species, such as potential competitors and enemies of the larvae. The concentration of the insecticide to be used is selected such that it kills a major proportion of the larvae. That is, more than 70% must be destroyed within the first 4 days following application, and adverse effects on other species should be very small.
In a preferred fashion, chemical and/or bacterial insecticides are used, and single addition thereof should normally be sufficient to destroy the larvae. If necessary, however, application of the insecticide can be repeated. To this end, the insecticide can be placed, preferably sprayed, on the surface of the aquatic system containing the larvae or can be incorporated in the aquatic system and preferably sprayed near the surface. The insecticide can be used in various formulations, e.g. in liquid form, as a floating powder, a floating oil, in the form of solids or emulsions. The insecticides are used at any dosage that allows destruction of a major part (at least 70%) of the human, animal and plant pathogenic microorganisms. In a preferred fashion they are effectively employed at a dosage of about 0.5 to 1.5 l/ha or 0.5 to 1.5 g/m3.
Insecticides having a specific effect are well-known to those skilled in the art. Some agents used according to the invention will be mentioned as representatives herein.
For example, a bacterial insecticide for mosquito larvae that is preferably used is Bacillus thuringienis israelensis. Bacillus thuringienis israelensis (Bti) is a bacterium, i.e. a microorganism, ingested in particular by mosquito larvae during feeding. For use, Bti in the form of e.g. a powder, a liquid or a tablet simply must be placed in the breeding waters. Bti bacteria contain a special protein crystal that is extremely toxic to larvae. However, this applies to mosquito larvae only. The protein crystal is completely harmless and ultimately ineffective for humans, fish, or even other insects. The first larvae die as early as 15-20 minutes after ingesting the bacteria. The bacterial insecticide for the control of mosquito larvae is preferably used at a dosage of about 0.5 to 1.5 l/ha, preferably 0.8 l/ha.
Other insecticides having a specific effect are e.g. substances from the class of neonicotinoids, all of which are synthetic nicotine compounds, including chloronicotinyl compounds such as imidacloprid, thiacloprid, which have a chloropyridyl heterocycle, or thianicotinyl compounds such as thiamethoxam, clothianidin, which have a chlorothiazol heterocycle.
Treatment with the insecticides produces a system substantially free of larvae. The ecological treatment prevents larvae from recolonizing the habitat. For ecological treatment, a potentially natural community is added to the aquatic system at the same time, i.e. in close temporal proximity. Surprisingly, such addition significantly accelerates the natural succession (development) of the biotic community in the system towards a community including a large number of food competitors and predators of larvae.
A suitable zooplankton community (competitors and predators of the respective larvae to be controlled) can be collected in nearby, long-standing water bodies, i.e. bearing water for a prolonged period of time. In such water bodies the succession has usually progressed to such an extent that competitors and predators of larvae are naturally present. The initial density of the community in the original water is about 10 to 100 individuals per liter. It is also possible to breed competitors and predators of larvae. Following transfer of the organisms into the aquatic system to be treated, the communities of competitors and predators of larvae develop up to high densities within a few days up to two weeks. The rate of development depends on the initial density of organisms employed and the physical and chemical conditions in the water. According to the invention, it is preferred to use a mixed community usually comprising the following species: Daphnia, Ceriodaphnia, Simocephalus, Scapheloberis, Ostracoda and/or Cyclopoida. A single-species community is understood to represent communities consisting of one single kind of a suitable competitor. Suitable competitors that can be used as single species are, for example, Daphnia species that are food competitors of mosquitoes. If necessary, the zooplankton communities can be accumulated by means of water filtration, using e.g. suitable nets, preferably with a mesh size of about 180 μm.
Advantageously, the zooplankton community is incorporated in the water at a dosage that exceeds the amount of human, animal and plant pathogenic microorganisms after pesticide treatment and is e.g. 10 to 200 individuals/liter.
Such ecological treatment, i.e. addition of a community existing in a natural context as well, reduces (i) recolonization of mosquito larvae following chemical insecticide treatment, and (ii) development and survival rate of possibly existing larvae. The mechanisms of this negative influence are, firstly, competition for food and, secondly, the impact of natural enemies of the mosquito larvae.
Particularly successful control of mosquito larvae is achieved by combined treatment of the larvae using Bti and a zooplankton community. The preferred community has the following taxa: Daphnia, Ceriodaphnia, Simocephalus, Scapheloberis, Ostracoda and Cyclopoida, preferably in proportions of 4, 74, 7, 3, 10 and 1%. Following single application of the insecticide in combination with the zooplankton community, a few mosquito larvae are observed only in some cases even after 3 weeks.
As a result of the development of competitors and predators, the method according to the invention allows successful prevention of recolonization following treatment with insecticides having a specific effect. Lasting suppression of the larvae is achieved unless the water body dries up or some other interference significantly impairs the community of competitors and predators. In addition to studies in Germany (see examples below), the results of investigations in e.g. Cameroon, Africa, demonstrate that the method according to the invention can also be used successfully in other climatic regions (e.g. tropical and subtropical areas).
The method was examined in its effectiveness using artificial outdoor water bodies (60 liters). The water bodies were colonized by a natural population of Culex pipiens. Initial chemical treatment was carried out using the Bacillus thuringienis israelensis insecticide (Bti, Vectobac 12S) at 1 g/m3.
If insecticide was used (“A”, “C”), the mosquito larvae population decreased from about 200 larvae/liter to 0 larvae per liter within the first two days. If chemical treatment was carried out alone (“A”), the water bodies were recolonized by mosquito larvae within the next 20 days (about 150 larvae/liter). This amount was comparable to the number of larvae in procedure “D” (no treatment). If a combined chemical and biological treatment was used (“C”), no mosquito larvae were present in the water bodies until the end of the test after 20 days. In the purely biological procedure (“B”) there was only a gradual reduction in the density of mosquito larvae from 280 individuals/liter down to 50 individuals/liter during the 20 days of testing.
The method was applied in natural, newly formed small water bodies in riparian forests in the region of Leipzig, Germany, in summer 2008. The water bodies were colonized by a natural population of Culex pipiens. Initial chemical treatment was carried out using the Bacillus thuringienis israelensis insecticide (Bti, Vectobac 12S) at 1 g/m3.
The results demonstrated that the mosquito larvae decreased within the first three days from about 200 larvae/liter down to 0 larvae/liter in both procedures. In procedure “A” (no community) the water bodies were recolonized by mosquito larvae from day 4 on. About 250 larvae per liter were present after 20 days. In procedure “B” (including community) a few mosquito larvae were observed only in some cases after 20 days.
Both examples show that sustainable and thus effective control of mosquito larvae is only possible by the combined effect of insecticides and competitors and predators of the mosquito larvae.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2008 043 715 | Nov 2008 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2009/065025 | 11/12/2009 | WO | 00 | 9/7/2011 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2010/055080 | 5/20/2010 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1831476 | Bennett | Nov 1931 | A |
| 2109642 | Hunt | Mar 1938 | A |
| 3234083 | Hardy et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
| 3501472 | Horne et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3590119 | Cardarelli | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3855313 | Metcalf et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3906103 | Kushlefsky et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3939277 | Metcalf et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3997999 | Evans | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4009259 | Ament et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4112946 | Herschler | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4166112 | Goldberg | Aug 1979 | A |
| 4206281 | Goldberg | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4218843 | Clarke, Jr. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4228614 | Cardarelli | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4328636 | Johnson | May 1982 | A |
| 4333922 | Herschler | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4631857 | Kase et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| RE32356 | Cardarelli | Feb 1987 | E |
| 4732762 | Sjogren | Mar 1988 | A |
| 5194264 | Van Tonder | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5273967 | Pittendrigh | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5389257 | Todd et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5484600 | Sjogren | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5665555 | Sweeney et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5720329 | Clarke, Jr. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5792750 | Borovsky et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5983557 | Perich et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6185861 | Perich et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6303364 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6335027 | Levy | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6337078 | Levy | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6346262 | Levy | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6389740 | Perich et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6391201 | Pelz | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6603063 | Feitelson et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6662491 | Flinn et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6708443 | Hall | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6772694 | Pearce et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6898898 | Cohen et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 7094592 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7361268 | Ogden | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7434351 | Bette | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7563453 | Dupree et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7694455 | Bowden et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7837988 | Sjogren et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7892571 | Sjogren et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7946077 | Fukuhara | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8109035 | Bowden et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8187618 | Sjogren et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8216825 | Yuan | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 20030056427 | Daffunchio et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20060239977 | Sjogren et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20080254000 | Drahos et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20110151508 | Lopez-Cervantes et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110158946 | Durvasula et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110268780 | Markus et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120064180 | Bossier et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284165 | Morgenthaler et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120315668 | Lopez-Cervantes et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130276355 | Koehler et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130296370 | Di Martino et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 4313109 | Oct 1994 | DE |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110308138 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
