This application is a U.S. national phase application based on International Application No. PCT/SE03/00407, filed 12 Mar. 2003, claiming priority from Swedish Patent Application No. 0200790-4, filed 15 Mar. 2002.
The invention concerns a method for the feed of cellulose chips during the continuous cooking of cellulose.
When cooking cellulose chips in continuous digesters, the chips are transported from a feed system at atmospheric pressure, or a pressure slightly over atmospheric pressure, by what is known as a “transfer flow” to an impregnation vessel or a digester at a considerably higher pressure. Transport in the transfer flow is made possible by the chips being combined with a transport fluid, preferably a process fluid, to form a slurry; the transport fluid being subsequently separated from the chips in separation equipment, normally denoted the “top separator”, when it has reached the impregnation vessel or the digester. The transport fluid is returned to the feed system through a return line. The transfer flow has for many years comprised a special type of sluice feeder, known as a high-pressure feeder, that will hereafter be denoted the “HP feeder”. This feeder has been specially designed such that it can resist the large differences in pressure that are present between the two systems. The HP feeder is provided with a rotor having symmetrical through-pockets that come into contact during rotation, alternately with the low-pressure system and the high-pressure system, without allowing any communication between these two systems. The chips can in this way be taken from a system at zero pressure or at a low pressure, typically 0-4 bar (abs), and they can be fed via the HP feeder into a system at a considerably higher pressure, typically 7-20 bar (abs).
The method currently used for filling the pocket in the HP feeder, used for example in U.S. Pat. No. 6,120,646, is to establish a large flow of fluid through what is known as a “chute flow” such that the transport fluid in this way carries chips with it into the pocket. There is thus a certain amount of the transport fluid in this chute flow that passes directly through the pocket during the filling phase. Chips are expelled from the pocket by the same principle for onwards transport up to the impregnation vessel or the digester in what is known as a transfer flow, something that in principle means that the transfer flow carries with it a larger quantity of transport fluid than is actually desirable. It is therefore necessary to withdraw (as a minimum amount) the excess transport fluid from the chips before they are fed down into the treatment vessel. The transport fluid that is withdrawn is returned to the HP feeder in order to expel chips again from a filled pocket in the HP feeder.
Very high liquid/wood ratios, L/W ratios, are created through both of these flows, and this has long been regarded as necessary in order to transport the chips. It has also been believed that the HP feeder requires these high fluid flows in order to function satisfactorily with respect to, among other aspects, the degree of filling and the expulsion of the chips from the pocket at the high-pressure position, particularly when it is required to increase the production capacity and when the rotation of the HP feeder has consequently been increased. This way of thinking has resulted in it being normal for many years to establish a L/W ratio in the chute flow of between 5-10 tones per tonne, and a ratio as high as 15-25 tones/tonne in the transport flow. Thus, these flows transport very high quantities of fluid, something that has resulted in pumps, pipes, valves and regulators for these flows becoming major expenses with respect to both investment and operation. This means that there are particularly strong reasons for discovering a method for transporting the chips from the input system to the digester system without these fluid flows, and this is the primary aim of the invention.
Surprisingly, it has now become clear that it is possible with a method according to the present invention to fill and empty the HP feeder without the large fluid flows that have previously been considered necessary. Experiments have shown that only a minimum of fluid is required for the purpose, namely: as much fluid that naturally fills the spaces that exist between the chips in the column of chips in the chip chute. In order to reduce the friction between the column of chips and the wall of the chute, however, somewhat more fluid than this minimum is used, typically 10% more that the smallest amount. This corresponds to a L/W ratio in the range 5-10:1.
Most of the cooking methods that have been developed in recent years have been directed towards establishing high L/W ratios both during the impregnation phase and during the cooking phase, typically approaching 5-10, which is to be compared with the ratios of 2.5-4 required according to older cooking methods. When using a method according to the present invention, only a minimum of fluid is used to transport the chips in the transfer line, and thus all the fluid can be allowed to accompany the chips to the subsequent treatment vessel. Thus, a return line for transport fluid is not necessary, nor are the pumps, valves and instruments associated with such a line, something that makes the input system a great deal cheaper. It will be clear to one skilled in the arts that it is possible to avoid the separation equipment at the top of the treatment vessel if this is desirable from the point of view of the process, something that ensures that the investment cost for a digester with an input system according to this invention is even further reduced.
The aim of the invention is to offer a method during the transport of a chips mixture from an input system that works at a first low pressure and that comprises an HP feeder for transfer of the chips mixture through a sluice to a treatment vessel in a digester system for the continuous cooking of chemical cellulose pulp that functions at a second, higher pressure and where the input system does not comprise a chute flow nor does it comprise a return line in the transport flow.
A further aim is to make an input system possible where a top separator at the top of the impregnation vessel or the digester is not necessary.
The method according to the invention can be applied in both single-vessel and in double-vessel digester systems of digesters of both steam-phase and hydraulic type. In one preferred embodiment the method is applied such that the fluid that feeds the chips mixture from the pockets of the HP feeder when these pockets are positioned in the emptying position in a second position is constituted by the fluid that has been expelled from the pockets of the HP feeder when these are positioned in a filling position in a first position. The chips mixture is transported from the HP feeder to a treatment vessel via a transfer line and the method is characterised in that the L/W ratio in the chips mixture is essentially maintained at the same level in this transfer line as the level in the position immediately before the feed into the HP feeder. The method does not require any extra addition of transport fluid to the HP feeder in order to extract the chips, which ensures that the return line for transport fluid from separation equipment at the top of the treatment vessel is not necessary.
According to one alternative embodiment, the method is applied to processes with high L/W ratios during the impregnation or the cooking, also making separation equipment at the top of the treatment vessel unnecessary.
The HP feeder can be located in an input system in order to promote a chips mixture from a chip chute with a preceding steaming vessel, which can be constituted by an impregnation vessel or by a digester. The HP feeder can also be located at a position between two treatment vessels, which can be constituted by a first impregnation vessel, at atmospheric pressure, and a second, pressurised, digester.
Further characteristics and aspects of the invention, together with its advantages, are made clear by the accompanying claims and by the following detailed description of some embodiments.
Description of the drawings:
a, 2b show schematically a feed system according to a technology developed later comprising both a chute flow and a transfer flow with return line (according to U.S. Pat. No. 6,120,646).
Two examples of feed systems are shown in
An arrangement equivalent to
A conventional HP feeder 53′ follows the chip chute equipped with a rotor with symmetrically placed through-pockets (1, 2) that during rotation are alternately placed in contact with the chip chute 52′ and the transfer line 6b′. When one of the pockets of the rotor through rotation gradually opens towards the chip chute 52′, it is filled with the fluid that in the previous position expelled the chips mixture into the circulation line 6b′. At the same time, the pocket facing the equivalent circulation line 54′ opens, and an open channel is created through the HP feeder. The pocket is in its first location when it is located in this filling position. Under the influence of one or more high-pressure pumps 57′, 57″ or one pump with several pumping stages in the circulation line 54′ together with the static pressure that is established by the column 52′ of fluid in the chip chute, the fluid in pocket 1 will be sucked out/expelled while the chips mixture is fed into the pocket at the same time. Since there is no chute flow with forced flow of fluid as there was in earlier methods, the chips and the fluid move down through the chip chute at the same speed. This means that the chips mixture is fed into the pocket 1 with a maintained L/W ratio, in contrast with earlier methods in which the forced flow of fluid carried chips with it into the pocket, causing in this manner a reduction in the L/W ratio. A further reduction in L/W ratio is obtained with the earlier methods of operation at the emptying position when the chips are expelled into the transfer line 6b with the aid of the transport fluid returned from the top separator. This reduction in L/W ratio, when the pocket in its second position is located at the emptying position, can be avoided with a method according to the present invention since it has been shown that expulsion of the chips does not require the addition of extra fluid in the circulation line 54′. Emptying of the pocket occurs according to the same principle as at the filling position in that a pocket 2 filled with chips mixture opens at the same time onto the transfer line 6b′ and the high-pressure side of the circulation line 54′ such that an open channel is formed and fluid from the circulation line 54′ can expel the chips mixture into the transfer line 6b′. Thus, it is possible both to fill and to empty the pockets in the HP feeder without either the chute flow or the transfer flow, and this is the principle aim of the invention.
It can occasionally be desirable from the point of view of the process to add a makeup fluid LIQB to the circulation line 54′ at a point that is located between the hiqh-pressure pump 57 and the first outlet 53′. Exclusively using the makeup fluid LIQE and the expulsion fluid from the first outlet 53′ pumped by the high-pressure pump 57 to the second inlet 53c′ to expel the chips mixture from a pocket of the sluice feeder into the transfer line shown in
Separation equipment 47′ is shown in the drawing at the top of the digester, in which equipment a part of the process fluid in the chips mixture can be withdrawn if this is desirable from the point of view of the process. This withdrawn fluid is made visible by the line LIQC. According to the innovative concept, this withdrawn process fluid LIQC is not returned to the HP feeder as a transport fluid, but there are otherwise no limitations on the use of this fluid. Depending on the cooking method, it can be led back to the input or to the impregnation vessel or in other cases it can be led forwards in the system and added as a cooking fluid in the lower zones of the digester. In cases in which impregnation with black liquor is applied, the withdrawn process fluid LIQC can be partially or fully led away for the recycling of its chemicals.
A certain amount of compression of the chips is obtained as a consequence of the high static pressure that is present at the bottom of the impregnation vessel 3. This compression is not obtained in a chip chute. One measure of the concentration of chips that is present at a certain position is constituted by the degree of filling that is present. A degree of filling of 100% corresponds to the concentration of chips that is obtained when a container is filled with non-deformed pieces of chip without any forced packing, where fluid is subsequently added to the container such that the fluid fills the spaces that are present between the pieces of chip, while the pieces of chip retain the contact with each other in the same manner as if no fluid were present in the container. The degree of filling for stable feed of chips in a chip chute normally lies at approximately 50-85%, while degrees of filling have been measured at the bottom of the impregnation vessel under stable conditions of operation of up to 110% due to the increased degree of packing that is obtained there. This means that an increased capacity of the HP feeder that is directly proportional to the degree of filling is obtained.
With the HP feeder located after a chip chute, it has been traditional to arrange the HP feeder such that filling of the same takes place from above when a pocket in its first position has a vertical axis of symmetry. However, the method according to the invention is not limited to this manner of filling the HP feeder, and filling can also take place when the axis of symmetry of the pocket is in a horizontal position. This may be particularly appropriate when the HP feeder is arranged subsequent to an impregnation vessel. Since impregnation vessels are normally placed on the ground, due to their size, it is not obvious that there is sufficient space available for filling of the HP feeder from above. If the impregnation vessel is provided with a bottom scraper, the motor of this scraper will be located centrally under the bottom of the impregnation vessel, which probably results in it becoming necessary to place the HP feeder to one side of the vertical axis of symmetry of the impregnation vessel, and thus it is no longer obvious that the best manner of filling the HP feeder is from above. Horizontal filling may be appropriate in this case, while it may also be relevant to consider filling from below.
The method may also be applied in a feed system according to the variation shown in
When the chips mixture is fed via the HP feeder and the transfer line to the top of the digester, it may be desirable to exchange process fluid at the top of the digester. However, it should be pointed out that the method according to the invention does not require the exchange of process fluid at this position. The process fluid that is separated from the chips in the top separator can be returned to another position in the process and, depending on how the process is designed, the process fluid can be used in both preceding and in subsequent sections of the process. If the fluid withdrawn from the top separator is impregnation fluid, it may be appropriate to return this fluid to the impregnation vessel. It is also the case that the impregnation fluid is, in general, rich in hemicellulose, and thus it may be desirable to seek to reprecipitate this hemicelulose onto the cellulose fibres in the digester, which means that the impregnation fluid can instead be added at the final phase of the cooking stage. A combination of the two positions at which it is added can also be envisaged. Further, it will be clear to one skilled in the arts that the method according to the invention is not limited to these manners of using the withdrawn process fluid, and that the use of this fluid does not constitute any characteristic of the innovative concept in any way other than that it is not to be returned to the HP feeder in order to be used as transport fluid in the transfer line.
Thus the method can be applied in all types of digester system such as single-vessel and double-vessel digester systems of both steam phase and hydraulic types; digester systems with black liquor impregnation (BLI); modified digester systems (MCC, EMCC, Lo-Solids), and ITC; and it can be used during the manufacture of cellulose pulp according to both the sulphite method and the sulphate method. In the same way, deciduous wood, conifer wood, annuals (such as bagasse, reed canary grass, etc.) can constitute the raw material for cellulose.
While the present invention has been described in accordance with preferred compositions and embodiments, it is to be understood that certain substitutions and alterations may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0200790 | Mar 2002 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE03/00407 | 3/12/2003 | WO | 00 | 8/16/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/078727 | 9/25/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3681192 | Reinhall | Aug 1972 | A |
4284120 | Gloersen | Aug 1981 | A |
4954219 | Gloersen | Sep 1990 | A |
5476572 | Prough | Dec 1995 | A |
5635025 | Bilodeau | Jun 1997 | A |
5968314 | Prough | Oct 1999 | A |
6120646 | Snekkenes et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6280567 | Gustavsson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6332950 | Snekkenes et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6436233 | Barrett et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447645 | Barrett et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
7112256 | Snekkenes et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7279070 | Snekkenes et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20010000588 | Snekkenes | May 2001 | A1 |
20020059991 | Barrett et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030000660 | Gustavsson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040060672 | Snekkenes et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050061464 | Snekkenes | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050279468 | Stromberg | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060037723 | Gustavsson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060070709 | Snekkenes et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070095490 | Snekkenes | May 2007 | A1 |
20070187053 | Snekkenes et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2001329479 | Nov 2001 | JP |
WO9942653 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 3078727 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2005064078 | Jul 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060037723 A1 | Feb 2006 | US |