Related teachings in the state of the art as U.S. Patent Application 20030081607 by Kavanagh, entitled general packet radio service tunneling protocol (GTP) packet filter, discloses a method of filtering data packets in General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) Tunneling Protocol (GTP) signaling messages, whereby selected messages from GTP Path Management, GTP Tunnel Management, GTP Mobility Management, and GTP Location Management messages are analyzed against a plurality of filtering criteria, and data packets that do not meet such filtering criteria are dropped while data packets that meet the criteria are passed. However, the application by Kavanagh speaks to a module for selective filtering of GTP Data packets, whereas our invention of present seeking the protection of Letters Patent, is largely directed at proxying and filtering GTP Control packet(s), which are on a separate User Datagram Protocol (UDP) port number and perform a different set of business operations.
WIPO Patent Application (WO) 03067830 by Camunas et al., entitled a system to obtain value-added services in real-time, based on the General Packet Radio Service (GPRS)-network, discloses a system to obtain value-added services in real-time based on the General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) network, which comprises Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSN) and Gateway GPRS Support Node (GGSN) nodes to enable the access from a mobile station to different data networks, using the radio access of a Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) or Universal Mobile Telecommunications Service (UMTS) network; wherein between the SGSN and GGSN nodes the invention comprises means to handle GTP protocol data packets, and wherein the GTP messages traffic, which would have otherwise flowed directly between the SGSN and the GGSN nodes, is diverted through said means. When said means detect a GTP message from an SGSN asking a GGSN for the establishment of a GTP tunnel for a Packet Data Protocol (PDP) context, said means establish instead two GTP tunnels: one between the Camunas et al.'s invention and the SGSN and the other between Camunas et al.'s invention and the GGSN (once established, the user data packets will arrive through one of the two tunnels associated to their PDP Context and will be transferred to the other tunnel). However, Camunas et al.'s invention requires all GTP packets to be intercepted, whereas the invention disclosed herewith only requires and speaks to the intermediation of GTP-C (GPRS Tunneling Protocol-Control plane) (the control) packets which remains a more resourceful approach to advancing the practice of the art. Furthermore, our invention may monitor the GTP-U (GPRS Tunneling Protocol-User plane) packets or alternatively rely on the packet intermediations of the method for implementing an Internet Protocol (IP) charging and rating middleware platform and gateway system as detailed in patent application Ser. No. 10/348,972, for the purpose of providing the data intermediation and intercept functionality on the data plane. (Technicians skilled in the art will recognize that the invention of present need not be limited to the aforementioned method for implementing an Internet Protocol (IP) charging and rating middleware platform and gateway system and other similar network implementations may be employed without diluting the intent and scope as such).
U.S. Patent Application 20030081607 dated May, 2003, to Kavanagh, A. in class 370/392.
Foreign Patent Document WO 03067830 dated August, 2003.
The present invention relates generally to wireless telecommunications and gateway/intercept services; and more specifically, to a method for the interception of GTP messages.
Disclosed is a species of control-message intercept method which includes a passive monitoring approach whereby the relevant control packets are inspected for the purpose of providing additional information for the further additional purpose of facilitating the operation of some primary or ‘master’ Internet Protocol (IP) charging/rating middleware platform/gateway system (intended to equip network operators with the ability to rate and bill IP traffic), and secondly, an invasive technique whereby control (GTP-C) messages are injected for the purpose of altering the state of a given data session in an more aggressive fashion (e.g. to drop a data session when the subscriber runs out of money in his/her prepaid account).
An aspect of the specification provides a method for the interception of general packet radio service tunneling protocol control (GTP-C) messages.
The method can be part of a computer program product (GTP-C Control Module), comprising:
a) a computer readable memory medium; and
b) a computer program.
The computer program product can intermediates said telecommunications traffic between the Gateway GPRS Serving/Support Node (GGSN) and the Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSN).
The computer program product can be articulated to intercept GTP-C messages with given fields, states, addresses, contexts and so forth.
The computer program product can be articulated to ignore and/or simply not process GTP-C messages (generally) or those with given fields, states, addresses, contexts and so forth.
The computer program product can interface with additional network components to provide further functionality as packet/date rating and classification, balance query and so forth.
Another aspect of the specification provides a control-message intercept method which exists, and is implemented as part of a computer program product, whereby control packets are passively monitored for the purpose of providing additional information for the further additional purpose of facilitating the operation of some primary or master Internet Protocol (IP) charging/rating middleware platform/gateway system (intended to equip network operators with the ability to rate, charge, and intermediate IP traffic), and secondly, an invasive technique whereby control (GTP-C) messages are modified, injected, or deleted for the purpose of altering the state of a given data session in an more aggressive fashion (including, where for instance, a data session need be dropped when the subscriber runs out of money in his/her prepaid account).
Members skilled in the art will recognize that the ensuing represents an illustrative recital of the preferred embodiments of the invention of present and other embodiments may be articulated, gleaned and articulated from such while still remaining within its spirit and scope. Indeed equivalents found within the state of the art, and those which may reasonably and effectively be deemed equivalent in the future should also be understood as being incorporated by reference hereto and such. Furthermore, much of the language has been illustrative and is to be construed as expressly for pedagogical purposes in helping elucidate the art as concisely and beneficially as practical.
The method for the interception of GTP messages disclosed herewith is implemented as part of a computer program product, hereinafter, the GTP-C Control Module.
In alternative embodiments, only a partial GTP-C stack need be articulated and developed when only handling a fraction of the totality of the messages. (These operations are CreateContextRequest/Response, UpdateContextRequest/Response and DeleteContextRequest/Response, although practitioners may well realize that other iterations and operations may be articulated). In this alternative embodiment, for the remainder of the messages, we need only be able to identify them as GTP-C messages and forward them on. (Indeed, this art is not intended to represent a proxy design. The GTP-C connection is generally not terminated at the GTP-C Control Module 30A 30B).
The method for the interception of GTP messages, in the preferred embodiment (though of course not necessarily), may also be co-articulated and implemented with the method for implementing an Internet Protocol (IP) charging and rating middleware platform and gateway system as detailed in patent application Ser. No. 10/348,972, to enhance the packet/data rating and classification mechanisms inherent in the invention disclosed hereto. Technicians skilled in the art will recognize that the invention of present need not be limited to the aforementioned method for implementing an Internet Protocol (IP) charging and rating middleware platform and gateway system and other similar network implementations may be employed without diluting the intent and scope as such.
Now, in continuing with reference to
In alternative embodiments, said deletePDPContext message can also initiate by the SGSN 10 or GGSN 50 where the GTP-C Control Module 30A 30B intercepts the message, and further triggers the session deletion to IP charging and rating middleware platform and gateway system 40A 40B. The deletePDPContext may then be simply forwarded by the GTP-C Control Module 30A 30B to the GGSN 50 or SGSN 10 depending on the initiator of the deletePDPContext message.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2005/001346 | 9/6/2005 | WO | 00 | 8/4/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/028225 | 3/15/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5650994 | Daley | Jul 1997 | A |
6031904 | An et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6067347 | Farris et al. | May 2000 | A |
6133912 | Montero | Oct 2000 | A |
6584312 | Morin et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6603969 | Vuoristo et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6628954 | McGowan et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6731932 | Rune et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6781972 | Anderlind et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6804716 | Koch et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7110749 | Zellner et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7116985 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7181441 | Mandato et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7203752 | Rice et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215754 | Woodson et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7493125 | Nagesh et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
20020115453 | Poulin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030063730 | Woodring | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081607 | Kavanagh | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115203 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040068502 | Vogedes et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040105424 | Skoczkowski et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148384 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050030920 | Garcia Cadarso et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20080119203 | Shalmon et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
03067830 | Aug 2003 | WO |
03067830 | Aug 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090168697 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |