The invention relates to a method for the localization of a fault location within a fuel injection system according to the features of the preamble to main claim 1.
Fuel injection devices for the operation of an internal combustion engine have been widely known for many years. In the case of a so-called common-rail injection system, the feeding of fuel into the respective combustion chamber of the internal combustion engine takes place by means of injectors, in particular by means of piezo injectors. As a rule, injectors are controlled here from within a control unit via an electrical circuit (final stage), and regulated by a software program. The electrical circuit arrangement and the microprocessor on which the software runs, are here as a rule components of the control unit, in particular of an engine control unit. Faults can arise during operation of the internal combustion engine, such as for example a short circuit of a connecting line of an injector to electrical ground or the battery, which call for the fastest possible separation of the electrical circuit arrangement from the injectors, in order to protect these against thermal destruction.
According to the prior art, methods are known, in which by means of additional components on the control unit it is attempted to determine the fault location within the fuel injection system with the maximum possible precision.
The object of the present invention now consists of the provision of a method which enables a simple and secure detection of the fault location without additional components for the control unit.
According to the invention, this object is achieved by means of the features of claim 1. Advantageous embodiments of the invention are characterized in the subclaims.
The advantages achieved with the invention consist in particular in that a method for localization of a fault location within an injection system is provided. This is in particular advantageous since by means of a precise identification of the fault location, the smallest replaceable unit is detected in the event of a fault, and workshop costs can thus be saved. Furthermore, vehicle availability is improved through identification of the fault location. Upon identification of an electrical fault by a diagnostic unit, the internal combustion engine is regulated to ensure it is in safe operating mode by means of suitable measures. An attempt is further made to identify whether just one injector or a bank of injectors is defective. Should identification of the defective injector not be possible here, the entire internal combustion engine must be switched off.
Details of the invention are explained in greater detail with reference to the drawings, wherein
A critical fault within the fuel injection system is identified by means of a diagnostic function in the control unit 3. It has proved particularly advantageous here to employ a software diagnostic function. Identification of the critical fault can for example take place in that a multiply recurrent activation of the protection device 2 is detected by the control unit 3. Based on the identification of the critical fault, separation of the control unit 3 from the injectors 5′ and 5″ takes place. The protection device 2 triggers a signal both to the electrical circuit of the separation unit 4 and to the selection unit 1, which effects a separation of the control unit 3 from the injectors 5′ and 5″ such that the circuit arrangement of the electrical circuit in the separation unit 4 is interrupted. However as a result of rapid separation of the control unit 3 from the injectors 5′ and 5″ by means of the separation unit 4, voltage peaks can occur within the fuel injection system as the coil in the circuit arrangement of the electrical circuit arrangement still carries current, which makes it almost impossible for the software to localize the fault occurring. It is thus only possible to establish that a serious fault has arisen, but not which fault symptom is present, e.g. short circuit to ground or battery or on the shared injector connecting line or on the selection line.
The control unit 3 then in each case transmits a pulse and/or a series of pulses to the particular injector 5′ or 5″ to be observed. The energy level and duration of this pulse must be selected such that the possibility of destruction of components in the control unit 3 is excluded, and/or no injection is effected by the injectors 5′ and 5″, and/or the separation unit 4 is not activated. As a result of the non-activation of the separation unit 4 it is ensured that the voltage and/or charge values measured at the injectors 5′ and 5″ can be used for fault location. Activation of the separation unit 4 takes place in the case of excessively high energy content of the pulse and/or an excessively high current gradient upon energization of the injector as a result of the pulse. The voltage values and/or charge values at the injectors 5′ and 5″ selected via the selection unit 1 are determined by means of a measuring device in the control unit 3.
A fault in the plug connector and/or in the cable loom within a fuel injection system can be identified when the measuring device in the control unit 3 detects a voltage value and/or charge value at the injector 5′ or 5″ which lies below a prescribed limit value. A fault in the injector 5′ and/or in the injector 5″ can then be identified, if the voltage value and/or charge value determined lies outside a predefined range. In order to identify a fault within the control unit 3, the control unit 3 must be separated from the injectors 5′ and 5″ via the separation unit 4. The control unit 3 likewise triggers a pulse and/or a series of several pulses with a defined energy content and of a defined duration, and transmits this to a load provided in the control unit 3, and not shown in the drawing. A fault within the control unit 3 is then identified if the measuring unit of the control unit 3 determines no voltage value and/or charge value on the load.
Upon charging of the injector 60, the separation unit 40 and the switch 30 of the selection unit are closed. Actuation of the switches 20, 30 and 40 is effected here by the control unit, which is not shown in the drawing.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 055 341.1 | Nov 2006 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/062596 | 11/20/2007 | WO | 00 | 5/20/2009 |