The invention relates to a method for the noise-reduced operation of a switched reluctance motor.
Switched reluctance motors are known from the state of the art. Furthermore, control methods are known which modulate the phase current in order to achieve a reduction in running noise. Here, the disadvantage is that either the system must be adjusted to the respective motor with much effort or the running noise reduction is not optimized.
The task of the invention is to provide a method which can be applied with little effort to different variants of reluctance motors and which effectively reduces the noise level.
The task is solved by the features specified in claim 1. Preferred further embodiments result from the subclaims.
The method for the noise-reduced operation of a switched reluctance motor is adopted by means of a reluctance motor assembly having the features described below.
According to the invention, the reluctance motor assembly comprises the switched reluctance motor, a control and evaluation unit, a data memory, a current regulator, a rotor angle sensor and a torque evaluator.
The data memory, the current regulator, the rotor angle sensor and the torque evaluator are each data-connected to the control and evaluation unit.
The control and evaluation unit is configured to receive data from the rotor angle sensor and torque evaluator and to process them. Furthermore, the control and evaluation unit is configured to control the current regulator and to read data from and write data in the data memory. The control and evaluation unit is preferably an electronic circuit such as a computer or a controller. In particular, the data memory, the torque evaluator and the current regulator can form an integrated structural unit together with the control and evaluation unit.
According to the invention, the switched reluctance motor comprises a stator, a rotor and motor coils. The rotor is preferably located inside a rotation-symmetric stator and is pivoted around a rotation axis. The stator and the rotor comprise soft magnetic material in tooth structure. Hereinafter, the teeth are also referred to as stator teeth and rotor teeth. Partly, the rotor teeth are also referred to as rotor arms hereinafter. Preferably, the motor coils are arranged at the stator symmetrically about the rotation axis of the rotor at the stator teeth. The reluctance motor is designed such that a magnetic flux is generated through the rotor by applying an electric current to the motor coils. The reluctance force aligns the rotor teeth with the stator teeth in such a way that the magnetic resistance is reduced. Thus, the geometric arrangement of the rotor teeth and stator teeth relative to each other causes the rotor to rotate. By switching on and off the motor coils at different stator teeth, such a magnetic flux is generated again and again, which causes the rotor to align itself to minimize the magnetic resistance. Hereinafter, the switched reluctance motor is also referred to sometimes in a shortened form merely as a reluctance motor or a motor.
The method according to the invention is based on the finding that the rotor teeth and the stator teeth deform as a result of the reluctance force, in particular transversely to their longitudinal axes. This deformation leads to vibrations of the rotor teeth and the stator teeth as well as, in part, also of other mechanically connected components of the reluctance motor or a driven unit, which are perceived as noise. To reduce the vibration and consequently the noise, the method provides a solution according to which the force on the rotor teeth and stator teeth is controlled such that their vibration is reduced. For this purpose, the torque is kept as constant as possible in all angular positions of the rotor. Consequently, substantially constant forces also act on the rotor teeth and stator teeth transversely to their longitudinal axes. The method provides a solution which is not bound to a specific geometry and other structural designs of the rotor teeth and stator teeth.
According to the invention, the method includes the following steps:
In the following, the method is described in detail with reference to the procedural steps:
An example of a corresponding value table is shown in Table 1.
Setpoint currents are assigned to each a rotor angle (Θist (actual)) and the setpoint torque for the respective motor coil to be energized. A table point forms a value tuple which comprises the rotor angle (Θist), the setpoint torque (MSoll (setpoint)) and at least one setpoint current, or preferably two setpoint currents, in particular one setpoint current for each of the two adjacent motor coils (I1, I2).
Table 1 shows a value table for a reluctance motor with two coils. For a reluctance motor with more coils, the value tuples contain additional setpoint current values for each additional coil.
This value table is stored in the data memory. The control and evaluation unit is configured to access the data memory and the value table.
The specification of a setpoint torque is determined by the load to be provided by the motor. The setpoint torque is specified by the control and evaluation unit during the starting process of the switched reluctance motor.
The rotor angle sensor measures the mechanical angular position of the rotor. In this way, it is known how the rotor teeth and the stator teeth are positioned relative to each other. Thus, the rotor angle sensor also determines the position of the rotor within a motor state.
The control and evaluation unit reads out the setpoint currents to the closest rotor angles and the setpoint torque from the value table of the data memory. The values of the four nearby table points which have been read out are set off against the real values, and the distance of the real values of the setpoint torque and the first actual rotor angle to the table points is determined. An example of four determined points is highlighted by a frame in the value table.
Bilinear interpolation is used to calculate the setpoint currents from the respective setpoint currents of the four table points.
The current regulator sets the calculated setpoint currents for the respective motor coils. It can be any type of current regulator known from prior art which has sufficiently fast switching times. Preferably, it is a digital current regulator.
The current regulator leads the setpoint current to the corresponding motor coil so that a magnetic flux is generated and consequently a force is applied to the rotor.
The torque evaluator evaluates the actual torque. Preferably, the actual torque is determined from the available parameters such as the actual currents and the rotor angle.
The control and evaluation unit determines a torque deviation by comparing the setpoint torque with the actual torque.
A detected torque deviation results in the finding that the level of the setpoint current was not completely suitable for setting the specified setpoint torque. Simultaneously, the size of the detected torque deviation provides a statement as to the extent to which a changed setpoint current would probably cause the actual torque corresponding to the setpoint torque.
According to the invention, the calculation is carried out for all four table points most recently used. The calculation is carried out as a function of the interpolation distance (h, l) used and the torque deviation (Msoll-Mist). Furthermore, a learning constant (KLern (Learn)) is included in the calculation.
The control and evaluation unit writes the values determined for the corrected setpoint currents in the value tuples of the four table points.
The operating phase of the motor from one commutation to the next commutation is referred to as a motor state. In this process, the rotor runs through all angular positions, starting from the angular position of one commutation to the next commutation. The angular position of the rotor at the end of a motor state equals the angular position at the start of the next motor state.
The partial cycle is repeated until the rotor of the reluctance motor has reached a rotation angle that corresponds to a congruent position to the rotation angle at the start of the next motor state. Depending on the number of arms of the rotor, it always reaches a congruent position for such a motor state after an angle that corresponds to 360° divided by the number of motor states. Here, the rotor is assumed to be a rotation-symmetric one.
In the case of a three-arm rotor, a motor state is terminated every 120°. A complete cycle is thus achieved. Thus, a complete cycle is the sum of all partial cycles performed from the start of a motor state to the termination of a motor state.
After reaching the first motor state, the partial cycle is also performed for the next motor state and repeated until a complete cycle is reached again.
The procedure is repeated for all subsequent complete cycles.
For a complete rotation of the rotor by 360°, three motor states and thus three complete cycles are performed for a three-arm rotor. For each motor state, a partial cycle is performed again and again until a complete cycle is reached again.
In the example according to Table 1, a first motor state is completed after a rotation of the rotor by 60°. For a complete rotor rotation of 360°, six motor states and thus six complete cycles are run through.
This is repeated continuously to achieve a permanent rotation of the rotor.
The method according to the invention offers in particular the following special advantages.
The method is iteratively self-learning. With each run of a partial cycle, the table points are optimized in relation to the value of the setpoint current. With continued execution of the method, all table points are covered by the optimization. By means of repeated execution, the setpoint current more and more approximates to the optimum value so that the torque deviation is asymptotically set to zero.
Due to the continuously improving torque setting, a particularly smooth running and noise reduction is achieved as an advantage.
Furthermore, it is advantageous that the method can be used for different motors without requiring adjustment or with only little adjustment effort. It is only necessary to initially set the value table with roughly determined values, which only have to ii enable the motor to run. When applying the method, each run of the partial cycles and the complete cycle leads to an automatic optimization of the values of the setpoint current in adjustment to the respective motor.
It is also advantageous that the method automatically compensates for any manufacturing tolerances.
Another advantage is given by the fact that the method provides automatic adjustment to changes that may only occur successively in the course of operation of the motor, such as imbalances or irregular running due to the wear of the bearings. The method has the effect that the setpoint currents are adjusted to the respective physical condition of the motor.
According to an advantageous further development, the value table is designed for a complete rotor rotation.
If the value table is designed for a complete rotor rotation, i.e., for a rotation of 360°, table points are assigned to each physical positional relation of a rotor tooth to a stator tooth in a reversibly clear manner. In this way, the method can compensate for even the finest manufacturing differences in the individual rotor or stator teeth, imbalances or signs of wear of the rotor. As a result, the running smoothness of the reluctance motor can be additionally increased and guaranteed even after long running times.
The invention is explained in more detail by way of example with reference to
The reluctance motor assembly comprises a control and evaluation unit 2, a data memory 3, a current regulator 4, a rotor angle sensor 5, a torque evaluator 6 and a switched reluctance motor 1.
The current regulator 4, the rotor angle sensor 5 and the torque evaluator 6 are each connected to the reluctance motor 1 and the control and evaluation unit 2.
In this embodiment, the data memory 3 with the value table is integrated into the control and evaluation unit 2.
The switched reluctance motor 1 has a stator 7, a rotor 8 and several motor coils 9.
The current regulator regulates the setpoint currents for the motor coils to the values transmitted by the control and evaluation unit 2.
The rotor angle sensor 5 determines the position of the rotor 8 and transmits it to the control and evaluation unit 2 and to the torque evaluator 6.
The torque evaluator 6 evaluates the actual torque from the parameters applied to the reluctance motor 1, in the embodiment in particular from the actual current, in relation to a specific rotor angle, and also transmits this actual torque to the control and evaluation unit 2. From this value, the control and evaluation unit 2 calculates a torque deviation and, on this basis, optimized setpoint current values and enters them into the value table of the data memory 3 thus deleting the previous setpoint current values.
The complete cycle is repeated for all motor states until a complete 360° rotation of the rotor is achieved (procedural step d)). Once a complete rotation of the rotor has been terminated, the entire sequence can be repeated as often as required to effect a continuous rotation.
The value table is continuously updated in step b)9.
The value interpolation according to procedural step b)3 is represented graphically in the coordinate system a). The control and evaluation unit is given the setpoint torque and the rotor angle sensor provides the actual rotor angle (Θist). The control and evaluation unit determines the four closest table points (P11, P12, P21, P22) and interpolates a setpoint current (Isoll) by bilinear interpolation. The value for a setpoint current (Isoll) obtained in this way by interpolation is set by the current regulator in procedural steps b)4 and b)5 and transmitted to the motor coils.
In procedural step b)6, the torque evaluator evaluates the actual torque (Mist) applied and, in procedural step b)7, the control and evaluation unit sets it off against the setpoint torque (Msoll) to obtain a torque deviation (Msoll-Mist).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2019 001 462.6 | Mar 2019 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2020/000038 | 2/27/2020 | WO | 00 |