METHOD FOR THE OPEN-LOOP OR CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL OF THE TEMPERATURE OF A STEEL STRIP DURING HOT WORKING IN A HOT STRIP MILL

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20230203612
  • Publication Number
    20230203612
  • Date Filed
    March 25, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Published
    June 29, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
A method for controlling or regulating the temperature of a steel strip in hot forming in a hot strip mill. A superordinate open-loop or closed-loop controller has a process model that predetermines the temperature development of the hot strip. The target values of the individual units are adjusted based on this predetermined temperature development.
Description
FIELD

The invention relates to a method for controlling or regulating the temperature of a steel strip in hot forming in a hot strip mill.


BACKGROUND

Hot forming of a steel strip usually takes place in a hot strip mill. Said hot strip mill consists of different individual units such as, for example, furnaces, roll stands, drives, unwinding and winding systems for the steel strip, or cooling sections. A large number of different devices or methods are known for open-loop or closed-loop control of such units. These open-loop or closed-loop controls are essentially based on a target/actual value comparison and deriving appropriate corrective measures to maintain the target value. Here, the target values to be observed are defined on the basis of empirical knowledge and/or previous process analyses. Furthermore, a relationship between the product properties of the steel strip and the target values of the unit to be set is usually established in advance. In production of the steel strip, there is usually a complex relationship between a wide variety of target values and the desired product properties.


Due to the increasing digitization of plant technology, unit-related process models are used for the development of suitable target values that lead to the desired product properties. Depending on the data available, complexity of the relationships and/or effort, statistical models, analytical models or neural networks are used for these unit-related process models, for example.


The disadvantage of such closed-loop control concepts for hot strip mills having multiple units is that interactions when changing target value specifications or actual values across the various units are not mapped by the unit-related process models and/or open-loop or closed-loop controls of the units. Especially in the production of steel strips with high demands on the material quality, the complex interaction of time, temperature, structure development and by these quasi-static closed-loop controls of individual aggregates can be difficult to optimize.


Furthermore, open-loop or closed-loop controls of individual units of a hot strip mill are disadvantageous in that an optimization of the process control of the individual unit does not always necessarily lead to the optimization of the entire production process. In particular in combined systems with, for example, continuous casting systems, energy and production costs can be saved through more dynamic process controls.


SUMMARY

It is the object of the invention to further develop known open-loop or closed-loop controls of a hot strip mill such that the target value specifications for the individual units are optimized across the plant with regard to the product properties of a steel strip, for example.


The object of the invention is achieved with a method. On a data processing system assigned to the hot strip mill, a superordinate process model exchanges and/or stores online target and/or actual values, including times, speeds, temperature, cooling rates and/or heating rates, with at least two open-loop or closed loop controls of the units. The superordinate process model, based on the exchanged target and/or actual values and/or stored values and using subordinate process models, such as, for example, a temperature model of the furnace, a temperature model of the cooling section or a model of the forming in the hot strip mill, predetermines the temperature of the steel strip online for at least one point before the hot strip is coiled. The superordinate process model determines new target value specifications for the units at this point in case of deviations in the predetermined temperature from a target value specification, transfers the target value specifications to the open-loop controller or closed-loop controller of the unit in order to comply with the target value specification for the temperature of the steel strip. The determination of the new target value specifications is carried out by using an optimization algorithm including at least one subordinate process model.


The superordinate process model maps a current production status of the steel strip based on the target and/or actual values of the units. Through suitable process models, such as, for example, energy and material balances for a homogenization furnace or a statistical model for that microstructural development of a steel strip, the superordinate process model determines the future development of a temperature profile before, for example, coiling. As a result, a difference between the target value specification for this individual unit and a possible deviation can be identified at an early stage. An optimization algorithm running in the superordinate optimization model can optimize target value specifications such that the target value specification for the hot strip before coiling is achieved, taking into account previously specified optimization goals. The optimization goals defined in advance can be, for example, production goals, in particular amounts of energy, production quantities or quality goals.


Preferred embodiments of the method are presented in the features of the disclosure. According to the disclosure, it is preferred that the preliminary product is a slab with a thickness dB ≥ 1 mm to dB ≤ 300 mm, preferably dB ≥ 50 mm to dB ≤ 160 mm from a casting machine and that the superordinate process model takes into account a casting speed, preferably between vG ≥ 4 m/min and vG ≤ 6 m/min, more preferably vG ≥ 5 m/min and vG ≤ 6 m/min, and a casting machine outlet temperature, preferably TGE ≥ 800° C. of the slab when determining the target specifications.


Preferably, according to the disclosure, the optimization target comprises energy consumption, production volume, process reliability, product properties, production costs and/or plant wear, the preferred reference variables in the field of steel production.


Furthermore, according to the disclosure, it is preferred if a subordinate process model determines the structure development of the steel strip in the hot strip mill for at least one point, preferably before the hot strip is coiled. In addition to the optimized temperature control, the resulting structure development is crucial for the further material properties and/or processing of the steel strip. The more precise open-loop or closed-loop control of the structure development in the course of the process makes it possible to react to deviations at an early stage and to reduce the quantities of rejects and/or post-treatments.


According to the disclosure, a roughing stand and a finishing stand are ideally used in hot forming. By dividing hot forming into a roughing stand and a finishing stand, advantageous temperature distributions and sequences can be set and these can also be better mapped by a larger number of measuring and control points. This enables the superordinate process model to react better to deviations. Furthermore, there are more opportunities to intervene in target value specifications of hot rolling.


It is preferred, according to the disclosure, that a temperature target value of TFS ≥ 850° C. to TFS ≤ 1050° C., preferably TFS ≥ 900° C. to TFS ≤ 1000° C., even more preferably TFS ≥ 900° C. to TFS ≤ 950° C. is specified by the superordinate process model for the target value of the inlet temperature into the finishing stand. Furthermore, it is preferred if a temperature target value within TFE ≥750° C. to TFE ≤ 950° C., preferably TFE ≥ 750° C. to TFE ≤ 900° C., more preferably TFE ≥ 800° C. to TFE ≤ 850° C. is specified by the superordinate process model for the target value of the outlet temperature out of the finishing stand.


According to the disclosure, a speed target value of vF ≥ 0.4 m/s to vF ≤ 1 m/s is specified by the superordinate process model for the target value of the inlet speed into the finishing stand.


According to the disclosure, a temperature target value of Tvs ≥ 1000° C. to Tvs ≤ 1150° C. is specified by the superordinate process model for the target value of the inlet temperature into the roughing stand. The target value of the outlet temperature from the roughing stand is specified by the superordinate process model for in a temperature range of TVE ≥ 950° C. to TVE ≤ 1100° C.


Ideally, according to the disclosure, a target value of dFS ≥ 20 mm to dFS ≤ 70 mm is specified by the superordinate process model for the target value of the inlet thickness into the finishing stand. The target value of the coiling temperature is preferably specified by the process model in the range from TH ≥ 30° C. to TVE ≤ 750° C., more preferably TH ≥ 450° C. to TH ≤ 550° C.


According to the disclosure, it is preferred if the alloying element C is limited to a content of 0.03% by weight to 0.15% by weight and/or Mn is limited to a content of 0.50% by weight to 2.00% by weight in the steel strip.


According to the disclosure, it is preferred if the optimized target value specifications are used for the production of a subsequent hot strip with the same production goals, in particular mechanical property. As a result, already existing optimized process sequences, which are described by the corresponding target value specifications, can be related to further production of the same material or steel strip type. This saves optimization time and makes it possible to react to gradual plant changes in advance.


Preferably, according to the disclosure, on a data processing system assigned to the hot strip mill, a superordinate process model can exchange and/or store online target and/or actual values, including times, speeds, temperature, cooling rates and/or heating rates, with at least two open-loop or closed-loop controllers of the units. The superordinate process model, based on the exchanged target and/or actual values and/or stored values and using subordinate process models, predetermines the temperature of the steel strip online for at least one point before the hot strip is coiled, and determines new target value specifications of the respective units at this point in case of deviations in the predetermined temperature from a target value specification. The new target value specifications are transferred to the open-loop or closed-loop controller of the respective unit in order to comply with the target value specification for the temperature of the steel strip. The determination of the new target value specifications is carried out by using an optimization algorithm including at least one subordinate process model.


The method according to the invention is described in detail below with reference to the figures mentioned in the form of exemplary embodiments. In all figures, the same technical elements are denoted by the same reference numerals.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The following three figures are attached to the description:



FIG. 1: Plant diagram of the hot strip mill



FIG. 2: Closed-loop control scheme with superordinate process model



FIG. 3: Comparison of temperature profile target value, actual value





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 shows a possible plant diagram of a hot strip mill for the production of a hot strip in which the method according to the invention is used. The hot strip mill consists of a casting plant 1, two shears 2, 10, two furnaces 3, 6, two roughing stands 4, a transfer bar cooling 5, an inductive heating 7, three finishing stands 8, a cooling section 9 and a coiler 11 for winding up the hot strip. A superordinate data processing system 12 has an integrated temperature and structure model. Target and actual values are exchanged with the different plants or associated closed-loop controls, open-loop controls and/or measuring systems and stored, for example, in the form of a database.



FIG. 2 shows a flowchart with an exemplary networking of two units or closed-loop controls of the two units with the respective process models. The superordinate data processing system I transfers target values to the superordinate process model II of the hot strip mill. From these target values, for example a strength, the superordinate process model II determines a number of target values or target value ranges, for example a temperature profile with minimum and maximum temperatures, which are transferred to the subordinate process models IIIa, b. The subordinate process models III a, b use these values to derive specific target values for the respective unit. For example, a specified temperature profile with assigned points in time becomes a target specification for burner control in a furnace 3 or a target specification for controlling the amount of water in a cooling section 9. These are passed on to the corresponding closed-loop controls of the respective units.


If the values within the unit are not reached, the subordinate process model III a, b can adjust the target specification. Likewise, an automatic optimization of the process model IIIa, b can also take place here by means of a self-learning algorithm. If the actual target value deviates from the target value specification V of the superordinate process model II, the target values are recalculated on the superordinate level II and adjusted if necessary.



FIG. 3 shows a diagram with a target temperature profile B and a measured and precalculated temperature profile A. The target temperature profile B begins at the end of the casting plant 1 and describes the course up to coiler 11. The actual values are plotted from the end of the casting plant 1 to the roughing stand 4. Here, the measured temperature is above the target temperature. From this point onwards, the superordinate process model II precalculates the temperatures at the various points in the hot strip mill. Based on this temperature profile, different target values can be newly specified at different points in order to correct the temperature deviation. Different process models, material or structure models and/or optimization algorithms can be used to determine the best adjustment strategy.





TABLE 1





Reference numerals





1

casting plant



2

shear



3

oven



4

roughing stands



5

transfer bar cooling



6

oven



7

inductive heating



8

finishing stands



9

cooling section



10

shear



11

coiler



12

integrated temperature and structure model


I
data processing system


II
superordinate process model


III a, b
subordinate process model


IV a, b
control of the unit


V
target value specification


A
actual value profile or pre-calculated course


A4
actual temperature of roughing stand


B
target value profile





Claims
  • 1-15. (canceled)
  • 16. A method for open-loop or closed-loop controlling the temperature of a steel strip with the alloying elements in % by weightminmaxC01Mn02.5in hot forming of a preliminary product with a thickness between dv ≥ 1 mm and dv ≤ 300 mm into a hot strip with a hot strip thickness dWB ≤ 25 mm and a hot strip width between bWB ≥ 900 mm and bWB ≤ 2100 mm, a target coiling temperature TH ≥ 30° C. to TH ≤ 750° C. in a hot strip mill, in particular TH ≥ 400° C. to TH ≤ 750° C., having at least one furnace for heating and/or temperature homogenization of the preliminary product, at least one roll stand for hot rolling the preliminary product, a cooling section for targeted cooling of the hot strip after forming, and a coiler for winding the hot strip to form a coil, with each individual unit having its own open-loop or closed-loop controller for the specified target values, wherein on a data processing system assigned to the hot strip mill, a superordinate process model exchanges and/or stores online target and/or actual values, including times, speeds, temperature, cooling rates and/or heating rates, with at least two open-loop or closed-loop controllers of the units;the superordinate process model, based on the exchanged target and/or actual values and/or stored values and using subordinate process models, predetermines the temperature of the steel strip online for at least one point before the hot strip is coiled; and the superordinate process model determines new target value specifications of the units at this point in case of deviations of the predetermined temperature from a target value specification, and transfers them to the open-loop or closed-loop controller of the unit in order to comply with the target value specification for the temperature of the steel strip; andthe determination of the new target value specifications is carried out by using an optimization algorithm including at least one subordinate process model.
  • 17. The method according to claim 16, wherein the preliminary product is a slab with a thickness dB ≥ 50 mm to dB ≤ 160 mm from a casting machine; andthe superordinate process model takes into account a casting speed, preferably between vG ≥ 4 m/min and vG ≤ 6 m/min, more preferably vG ≥ 5 m/min and vG ≤ 6 m/min, and a casting machine outlet temperature, preferably TGE ≥ 800° C., of the slab when determining the target specifications.
  • 18. The method according to claim 16, wherein the optimization goal comprises energy consumption, production volume, process reliability, product properties, production costs and/or plant wear.
  • 19. The method according to claim 16, wherein a subordinate process model determines the structure development of the steel strip in the hot strip mill for at least one point, preferably before the hot strip is coiled.
  • 20. The method according to claim 16, wherein a roughing stand and a finishing stand are used in hot forming.
  • 21. The method according to claim 19, wherein a temperature target value of TFS = 850° C. to TFS = 1050° C., preferably TFS = 900° C. to TFS = 1000° C., even more preferably TFS = 900° C. to TFS = 950° C. is specified by the superordinate process model for the target value of the inlet temperature into the finishing stand.
  • 22. The method according to claim 19, wherein a temperature target value within TFE ≥ 750° C. to TFE ≤ 950° C., preferably TFE ≥ 750° C. to TFE ≤ 900° C., more preferably TFE ≥ 800° C. to TFE ≤ 850° C. is specified by the superordinate process model for the target value of the outlet temperature out of the finishing stand.
  • 23. The method according to claim 19, wherein a speed target value of vF ≥ 0.4 m/s to vF ≤ 1 m/s is specified by the superordinate process model for the target value of the inlet speed into the finishing stand.
  • 24. The method according to claim 19, wherein a temperature target value of TVS ≥ 1000° C. to TVS ≤ 1150° C. is specified by the superordinate process model for the target value of the inlet temperature into the roughing stand.
  • 25. The method according to claim 19, wherein a temperature target value of TVE ≥ 950° C. to TVE ≤ 1100° C. is specified by the superordinate process model for the target value of the outlet temperature from the roughing stand.
  • 26. The method according to claim 19, wherein a target value within dFS ≥ 20 mm to dFS ≤ 70 mm is specified by the superordinate process model for the target value of the entry thickness into the finishing stand.
  • 27. The method according to claim 16, wherein a temperature target value of TH ≧ 30° C. to TVE ≦ 750° C., preferably TH ≧ 450° C. to TH ≦550° C. is specified by the superordinate process model for the target value of the coiling temperature.
  • 28. The method according to claim 16, wherein the alloying element C is limited to a content of 0.03% by weight to 0.15% by weight and/or Mn to a content of 0.50% by weight to 2.00% by weight in the steel strip.
  • 29. The method according to claim 16, wherein the optimized target value specifications are used for the production of a subsequent hot strip with the same production goals, in particular the mechanical properties.
  • 30. A device for open-loop or closed-loop controlling the temperature of a steel strip according to a method according to claim 16, wherein on a data processing system assigned to the hot strip mill, target and/or actual values, including times, speeds, temperature, cooling rates and/or heating rates, can be exchanged and/or stored online with at least two open-loop or closed-loop controllers of the units by a superordinate process model;the superordinate process model, based on the exchanged target and/or actual values and/or stored values and using subordinate process models, can predetermine the temperature of the steel strip online for at least one point before the hot strip is coiled; andthe superordinate process model determines new target value specifications of the respective units at this point in case of deviations of the predetermined temperature from a target value specification, and transfers them to the open-loop or closed-loop controller of the respective unit in order to comply with the target value specification for the temperature of the steel strip; andthe determination of the new target value specifications is carried out by using an optimization algorithm including at least one subordinate process model.
  • 31. The method according to claim 17, wherein the optimization goal comprises energy consumption, production volume, process reliability, product properties, production costs and/or plant wear.
  • 32. The method according to claim 17, wherein a subordinate process model determines the structure development of the steel strip in the hot strip mill for at least one point, preferably before the hot strip is coiled.
  • 33. The method according to claim 18, wherein a subordinate process model determines the structure development of the steel strip in the hot strip mill for at least one point, preferably before the hot strip is coiled.
  • 34. The method according to claim 17, wherein a roughing stand and a finishing stand are used in hot forming.
  • 35. The method according to claim 18, wherein a roughing stand and a finishing stand are used in hot forming.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10 2020 205 655.2 May 2020 DE national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2021/057720 3/25/2021 WO