The invention is explained in greater detail below based on an exemplary embodiment shown in two figures.
While this invention may be embodied in many different forms, there are described in detail herein a specific preferred embodiment of the invention. This description is an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the particular embodiment illustrated.
The effective power P is shown on the abscissa. The shown effective power range begins at zero and extends up to a maximum effective power, which may exceed the nominal power of the wind power plant by a certain amount. On the ordinate, a maximum idle power Q (curve 2) and a minimum idle power Q (curve 4) are assigned to each effective power P. The amounts of the minimum and maximum idle powers assigned to a certain effective power value in curves 2 and 4 correspond with a specified or registered idle power, which corresponds with a capacitive or inductive idle power. The amounts must not be equal.
The curves 2 and 4 are identified taking into consideration the permissible current carrying capacity of all relevant components of the wind power plant. The current carrying capacities and the thermal capacities of the rotor and stator coils as well as the converter are incorporated in particular. As a result, the curves 2 and 4 show a progression that approximates a root function. One would obtain a progression that is exactly equal to a root function if one would only include a constant apparent power when calculating the permissible idle powers.
The dashed curve 10 shows a maximum effective power Pmax resulting from the amount of wind power. In the time segment shown in the diagram, this theoretically possible maximum effective power includes, beginning from relatively low values, a maximum around point t2 and then drops again.
In line with the correlation between the effective power and the maximum or minimum idle power shown in
Furthermore, a specified target idle power Qtarget (curve 16) is shown as a thin solid line 16 in the diagram. This target idle power corresponds with an external specification. The shown target idle power proceeded up to time t2 at a first constant level, then increases up to time t3 and subsequently proceeds at a second constant level.
The mode of operation of the controller according to the invention is now on the bold curves 18 and 20, which show the actual released idle power Qactual (solid curve 18) and effective power P (dashed curve 20).
The release idle power Qactual corresponds with the specified idle power Qtarget during the entire time progression. A regulation of the released idle power to the specified target value Qtarget takes place. The insignificant displacement of the two curves 16 and 18 only serves to improve recognizability.
The released effective power P only partially corresponds with the maximum possible effective power Pmax. In the time interval between t1 and t4, the released effective power P is lower than the theoretically possible effective power Pmax. The deviation begins at point in time t1. At this time, the upper limit of the attainable idle power interval shown by curve 14 for the maximum possible effective power Pmax drops below the specified idle power Qtarget (curve 16). Thus, the effective power Pmax is reduced with respect to the maximum possible effective power Pmax. It runs up to time t2 at a constant value. This value corresponds with that of the effective power value, in which the upper limit of the idle power interval corresponds with the target idle power, i.e. with the value shown at time t1. The target idle power is increased beginning with time t2. This required target idle power cannot be achieved with the effective power P released at time t2, because it lies outside of the idle power interval assigned to this effective power. Thus, the released effective power P by time t3 is further reduced. The released idle power Qactual can thus be increased according to the target value Qtarget.
At time t3, the specified target idle power assumes a constant value again. Accordingly, the effective power P also remains at a constant level, which is compatible with the required target idle power. At time t4, the maximum creatable effective power Pmax drops to the current value P at time 4 as a result of a reduced amount of wind. The maximum possible effective power Pmax is subsequently reduced as a result of the decreasing amount of wind. In this case, the actual effective power P provided follows the maximum possible level Pmax. The released idle power Qactual thereby remains at the level of the target idle power value, which as of time t4 again lies within the idle power interval assigned to the maximum possible effective power Pmax.
The above disclosure is intended to be illustrative and not exhaustive. This description will suggest many variations and alternatives to one of ordinary skill in this art. All these alternatives and variations are intended to be included within the scope of the claims where the term “comprising” means “including, but not limited to”. Those familiar with the art may recognize other equivalents to the specific embodiments described herein which equivalents are also intended to be encompassed by the claims.
Further, the particular features presented in the dependent claims can be combined with each other in other manners within the scope of the invention such that the invention should be recognized as also specifically directed to other embodiments having any other possible combination of the features of the dependent claims. For instance, for purposes of claim publication, any dependent claim which follows should be taken as alternatively written in a multiple dependent form from all prior claims which possess all antecedents referenced in such dependent claim if such multiple dependent format is an accepted format within the jurisdiction (e.g. each claim depending directly from claim 1 should be alternatively taken as depending from all previous claims). In jurisdictions where multiple dependent claim formats are restricted, the following dependent claims should each be also taken as alternatively written in each singly dependent claim format which creates a dependency from a prior antecedent-possessing claim other than the specific claim listed in such dependent claim below.
This completes the description of the preferred and alternate embodiments of the invention. Those skilled in the art may recognize other equivalents to the specific embodiment described herein which equivalents are intended to be encompassed by the claims attached hereto.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102006 039 693.6 | Aug 2006 | DE | national |